30 November 2005
Dear Councillor,
In pursuance of the provisions of the Local
Government Act, 1993 and the Regulations thereunder, notice is hereby given
that an ORDINARY MEETING of Penrith
City Council is to be held in the Council Chambers, Civic Centre, 601 High
Street, Penrith on Monday 5 December 2005 at 07:00PM.
Attention is directed to the statement
accompanying this notice of the business proposed to be transacted at the
meeting.
Yours Faithfully
Alan Travers
General Manager
BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
2. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Ordinary Meeting - 21 November 2005.
4. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Pecuniary Interest (The
Act requires Councillors who declare a pecuniary interest in an item to leave
the meeting during discussion of that item)
Non-Pecuniary Interest
5. ADDRESSING THE MEETING
6. MAYORAL MINUTES
7. NOTICES OF MOTION
8. ADOPTION OF REPORTS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEES
9. MASTER PROGRAM REPORTS
10. URGENT REPORTS (to
be dealt with in the master program to which the item relates)
11. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
12. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Monday 5 December 2005
table of contents
seating arrangements
meeting calendar
confirmation of minutes
report and recommendations of committees
master program reports
PRAYER
“Sovereign
God, tonight as we gather together as a Council we affirm that you are the
giver and sustainer of life. We come
together as representatives of our community to make decisions that will
benefit this city and the people within it.
We
come not in a spirit of competition, not as adversaries, but as
colleagues. Help us to treat each other
with respect, with dignity, with interest and with honesty. Help us not just to hear the words we say,
but also to hear each others hearts. We
seek to be wise in all that we say and do.
As
we meet, our concern is for this city.
Grant us wisdom, courage and strength.
Lord,
help us. We pray this in the name of
Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.”
Statement of Recognition of Penrith City’s
Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander
Cultural Heritage
Council values the unique
status of Aboriginal people as the original owners and custodians of lands and
waters, including the land and waters of Penrith City.
Council values the unique
status of Torres Strait Islander people as the original owners and custodians
of the Torres Strait Islands and surrounding waters.
We work together for a
united Australia and City that respects this land of ours, that values the
diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage, and
provides justice and equity for all.
Council Chambers Seating
Arrangements
Managers
Chief Financial Officer
Barry Husking
MEETING CALENDAR
December 2005
|
TIME |
DEC |
Mon |
||
Ordinary Meetings |
7.00 pm |
5 |
12 |
||
Policy Review Committee |
7.00 pm |
|
-
Council has two Ordinary
Meetings per month where practicable.
-
Extraordinary Meetings are held
as required.
-
Policy Review Meetings are held
monthly where practicable.
-
Members of the public are
invited to observe meetings of the Council. Should you wish to address Council,
please contact the Executive Officer, Glenn McCarthy on 47327649.
OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF PENRITH CITY COUNCIL HELD IN THE
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ON MONDAY 21 NOVEMBER 2005
AT 7:04pm
NATIONAL
ANTHEM AND PRAYER
The meeting opened with the National Anthem and Prayer read by Reverend Neil Checkley.
STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor John Thain read a statement of recognition of Penrith City’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage.
PRESENT
His Worship the Mayor Councillor John Thain, Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, Lexie Cettolin, Kevin Crameri OAM, Jackie Greenow, Karen McKeown, Susan Page (arrived 7.16pm), Garry Rumble, Pat Sheehy AM, and Steve Simat.
546 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Pat Sheehy seconded Councillor Garry Rumble apologies be received from Councillor Mark Davies and Councillor Susan Page. |
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Leave of Absence was previously granted to Councillor David Bradbury for the period 31 October 2005 to 4 December 2005 inclusive.
Leave of Absence was previously granted to Councillor Ross Fowler for the period 19 November 2005 to 24 November 2005 inclusive.
Leave of Absence was previously granted to Councillor Greg Davies for the period 19 November to 26 November 2005 inclusive.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor Garry Rumble declared a non-pecuniary interest in Item 4 as he is a member of Apex 40 and he reserved his right to speak and vote.
MASTER PROGRAM REPORTS
LEADERSHIP AND ORGANISATION
552 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor
Pat Sheehy seconded Councillor Jim Aitken that Item 18 – 2005-2006 Management
Plan – September Quarter Review be dealt with first. |
The
City in its Broader Context
563
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded
Councillor Garry Rumble that the information contained in the report on International Links Program -
Update Report be received. |
The
City Supported by Infrastructure
565
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken seconded Councillor
Pat Sheehy that the information contained in the report on 2005 Local Government
Association Conference be received. |
567
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken seconded Councillor
Pat Sheehy that the information contained in the report on Financial Assistance Grant be
received. |
569
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken seconded Councillor
Pat Sheehy that the information contained in the report on Salary Administration System be
received. |
Councillor
Kevin Crameri requested a report on the trapping of Myna birds and the
implications of their disposal. |
Councillor Steve Simat requested a report on how Council is
going to clean up Grafitti in and around Queen St, St Marys. |
|
Councillor Jackie
Greenow requested a memo reply to all Councillors as to why land has been
cleared along the Great Western Highway
(Southside of Highway) from Burns Creek to near Four Winds. |
|
Councillor Jim
Aitken requested a report to Council on the plans and costings of maintaining
the landscaping and parks in Glenmore
Park. |
|
Councillor Jim Aitken requested that street
lighting be provided on River Road, Leonay right near house 165. |
|
Councillor Jim
Aitken requested an update on the repairs to the draining system under the
railway bridge at Emu Plains that is
covered with the large steel plate. |
|
Councillor John
Thain requested a report to Council on holding an Annual Mayoral Ball. The report is to include possible venues
and how best to allocate any proceeds to
selected charities. |
|
579 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Pat Sheehy seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri the meeting adjorn to the Committee of the Whole to deal with the
following matters, the time being 8.11pm. |
1 Presence
of the Public
CW1 RESOLVED on the motion of Councillor Pat Sheehy seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri that the press and public be excluded from Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters:
Leadership and
Organisation
2 Commercial Matter - Council Property -
Lease to W & L Pty Ltd of part of 114-116 Henry Street, Penrith 319943
LE1 Pt.3
3 Commercial Matter - Council Property -
Lease of Suite 1, Gaymark Lane, 134-138 Henry Street, Penrith 319961
LE6
4 Senior Staff Matter 909/91
Pt8
The meeting resumed at 8.35pm and the Executive Officer reported that the Committee of the Whole met at 8.11pm on 21 November 2005, the following being present
His Worship the Mayor Councillor John Thain, Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, Kevin Crameri OAM, Jackie Greenow, Karen McKeown, Susan Page, Garry Rumble, Pat Sheehy AM, and Steve Simat.
and the Committee of the Whole excluded the press and public from the meeting for the reasons set out in CW1 and that the Committee of the Whole submitted the following recommendations to Council.
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
CW4 That 1. The information
contained in the report on Senior Staff Matter be received 2. The processes outlined in the report be adopted. |
ADOPTION
OF Committee of the Whole
580 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Pat
Sheehy seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow that the
recommendation contained in the Committee of the Whole and shown as CW1 to
CW5 be adopted. |
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Councillor
Garry Rumble requested an urgent report on Councils Parking Policy |
|
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 8.41pm.
Procedure
for Addressing Meetings
Anyone can request permission to address a meeting, providing that the
number of speakers is limited to three in support of any proposal and three
against.
Any request about an issue or matter on the Agenda for the meeting can
be lodged with the General Manager or Public Officer up until 12 noon on the
day of the meeting.
Prior to the meeting the person who has requested permission to address
the meeting will need to provide the Public Officer with a written statement of
the points to be covered during the address in sufficient detail so as to
inform the Councillors of the substance of the address and a written copy of
any questions to be asked of the Council in order that responses to those
questions can be provided in due course.
In addition, prior to addressing the meeting a person addressing Council
or Committee will be informed that they do not enjoy any privilege and that
permission to speak may be withdrawn should they make inappropriate comments.
It should be noted that speakers at meetings of the Council or Committee
do not have absolute privilege (parliamentary privilege). A speaker who makes any potentially
offensive or defamatory remarks about any other person may render themselves
open to legal action.
Prior to addressing the meeting the person will be required to sign the
following statement:
“I (name) understand that the meeting I intend to
address on (date) is a public meeting.
I also understand that should I say or present any material that is
inappropriate, I may be subject to legal action. I also acknowledge that I have been informed to obtain my own
legal advice about the appropriateness of the material that I intend to present
at the above mentioned meeting”.
Should a person fail to sign the above statement then permission to
address either the Council or Committee will not be granted.
The Public Officer or Minute Clerk will speak to those people who have
requested permission to address the meeting, prior to the meeting at 6.45pm.
It is up to the Council or Committee to decide if the request to address
the meeting will be granted.
Where permission is to be granted the Council or Committee, at the
appropriate time, will suspend only so much of the Standing Orders to allow the
address to occur.
The Chairperson will then call the person up to the lectern or speaking
area.
The person addressing the meeting needs to clearly indicate:
· Their
name;
· Organisation
or group they are representing (if applicable);
· Details
of the issue to be addressed and the item number of the report in the Business Paper;
· Whether
they are opposing or supporting the issue or matter (if applicable) and the action they would like the
meeting to take;
·
The interest of the speaker (e.g. affected person,
neighbour, applicant, applicants
spokesperson, interested citizen etc).
Each person then has five minutes to make their address. Those addressing Council will be required to
speak to the written statement they have submitted. Permission to address Council is not to be taken as an
opportunity to refute or otherwise the points made by previous speakers on the
same issue.
The Council or Committee can extend this time if they consider if
appropriate, however, everyone needs to work on the basis that the address will
be for five minutes only.
Councillors may have questions about the address so people are asked to
remain at the lectern or in the speaking area until the Chairperson has thanked
them.
When this occurs, they should then return to their seat.
Steve Hackett
Public Officer
02 4732 7637 August
2003
Item Page
The
City as a Social Place
1 ICF
Canoe Slalom World Championships 2005 2071/10 1
2 Community
Assistance Program - Planned Component 2005 6016/51 10
3 Australasian
Cemeteries and Crematoria Association Conference 16-20 October 2005 1004/24 15
4 Draft
Open Space Action Plan and draft Open Space Section 94 Development
Contributions Plan 1980/10PT8 17
5 Development
Application 05/0229 proposal for a detached dual occupancy at Lot 268 DP 204977
(No. 51) Westbank Avenue, Emu Plains. Applicant: Mr S & Mrs K Harris; Owner: Mr S & Mrs K Harris 05/0229 21
6 Development
Application 05/1320 proposal to use Shop No. 2 at Lot 16 DP 583184 (No. 91)
Great Western Highway, Emu Plains. Applicant: Jim Aitken; Owner: Jim Aitken DA05/1320 33
URGENT REPORTS
16 ADI
Site, St Marys - Public Exhibition of Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 30
- St Marys - Draft Amendment No. 1 4130/2 101
17 Application
to rezone Lot 1 DP 542395 and Lot 740 DP 810111 Elizabeth Drive, Luddenham, to
allow an Advanced Waste Treatment Facility in conjunction with the existing
quarry and landfill operation. Applicant: Mullane Planning Consultants Pty
Limited; Owner: SITA Australia Pty
Limited RZ04/0035 123
The
City In Its Environment
7 Greenhouse
Gas Reduction Plan 2005 and Water Management Plan 2005 7018/14 and 4109/36 45
8 Indian
Myna Birds 7028/4 53
The
City Supported by Infrastructure
9 David
Road, Emu Plains DA/19 59
10 Road
Infrastructure Priority List (9011/55;
MA/02 Pt7; 34/12) 62
11 Rural
Fire Brigades Grant Funding 1033/4 69
12 Penrith
VRA Rescue Squad 1101/1 Pt 4 71
Leadership
and Organisation
13 City
Operations Directorate Report to mid November 2005 153/2 77
14 Liquor
Licence 20/14 93
15 Hydrotherapy
Centre Operation 2986/8 95
The
City as a Social Place
Item Page
1 ICF
Canoe Slalom World Championships 2005 2071/10 1
2 Community
Assistance Program - Planned Component 2005 6016/51 10
3 Australasian
Cemeteries and Crematoria Association Conference 16-20 October 2005 1004/24 15
4 Draft
Open Space Action Plan and draft Open Space Section 94 Development
Contributions Plan 1980/10PT8 17
5 Development
Application 05/0229 proposal for a detached dual occupancy at Lot 268 DP 204977
(No. 51) Westbank Avenue, Emu Plains. Applicant: Mr S & Mrs K Harris; Owner: Mr S & Mrs K Harris 05/0229 21
6 Development
Application 05/1320 proposal to use Shop No. 2 at Lot 16 DP 583184 (No. 91)
Great Western Highway, Emu Plains. Applicant: Jim Aitken; Owner: Jim Aitken DA05/1320 33
URGENT REPORTS
16 ADI
Site, St Marys - Public Exhibition of Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 30
- St Marys - Draft Amendment No. 1 4130/2 101
17 Application
to rezone Lot 1 DP 542395 and Lot 740 DP 810111 Elizabeth Drive, Luddenham, to
allow an Advanced Waste Treatment Facility in conjunction with the existing
quarry and landfill operation. Applicant: Mullane Planning Consultants Pty
Limited; Owner: SITA Australia Pty
Limited RZ04/0035 123
5 December
2005 |
|
The City as a Social
Place |
|
The City as a Social Place
1 |
2071/10 |
Compiled by: Andrew
Robinson - Recreation and Cultural Facilities Coordinator
Authorised by: Gary Dean - Facilities Operations
Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: The City’s recreation and leisure
facilities and services meet its needs and are optimally used.
Critical Action: Facilitate joint use of the City’s recreation and leisure facilities,
including co-location of programs.
Purpose:
To advise Council
of the outcome of the World Canoe Slalom Championships 2005, 29th September -
3rd October. The report recommends that
the information be received.
Background
In the
previous report, Council was advised of the history of the World Canoe Slalom
Championships, why Penrith Whitewater Stadium (PWS) was selected for the 2005
event, Australian Canoeing’s expectations of the event, the structure of the
event organisation and Council’s involvement. In summary:
· The first World Championships under the patronage of the International Canoe Federation (ICF) in Canoe Slalom were organized in 1949 in Geneva / Switzerland. The World Championships take place every year, except for the year of the Olympic Games. As a legacy of the 2000 Sydney Olympics, the Championships were awarded to Australia (for the first time) and which were to be held at PWS.
· Australian Canoeing, aimed to attract 400 athletes from 80 nations to participate in the event. Through the event the ICF aimed to develop the future of the sport and the profile of canoeing within the Olympic Games movement.
· Australian Canoeing estimated that up to 15,000 people, including spectators, VIP’s, sponsors, team members and support staff, media, would visit PWS for the competition and that, through the television agreement with SBS, the event would have the potential of being broadcast to 98 million households world-wide.
· Australian Canoeing, the national organisation for the management, coordination, development and promotion of paddle sports in Australia was to have the overall responsibility for managing and coordinating the successful implementation of the event through an Event Director. The Event Director would report to funding partners and key agency stakeholders. Council was represented on the Organising Committee by former Mayor, Councillor Jackie Greenow, and the General Manager. The Facilities Operations Manager, Recreation and Cultural Facilities Coordinator, and a City Marketing Officer provided a support role to the Committee. Other representatives were: the CEO Australian Canoeing, the Chairman Councillor Ross Fowler and the Venue Manager of the Penrith Whitewater Stadium, the Project Director Major Events and Venues (NSW Department of Tourism Sport and Recreation), and Karen Paluzzano MP, Member for Penrith. This Committee was to act as an approvals and discussion forum regarding all event related issues and, where appropriate, facilitate actions arising out of the meeting.
· Australian Canoeing made an initial request for sponsorship support from Council for the event to the value of $80,000. At the time of the request it was difficult to identify an appropriate source of Council funding to sponsor the event. Therefore, it was suggested that Council would be committed to working in partnership with Australian Canoeing, within available resources, to assist in the creation of a successful Canoe Slalom World Championships and a warm welcome to the City for visitors to the event. To this extent both the Facilities Operations and the Economic Development and City Marketing Departments were to identify a range of projects to enable Australian Canoeing to achieve these goals.
The Championships
The World Championships consisted
of the best athletes from 50 nations competing over four days between 29th
September – 3rd October 2005. Five days of competition were
scheduled but high winds on day one forced the competition to be cancelled and
rescheduled.
i) Participation
Australian Canoeing report that a
total number of 15,000 people attended the event throughout the course of the
Championships including 37 technical officials from 18 countries, 47 media from
7 countries and 200 volunteers from both Penrith and the wider region.
22 schools signed up to the ‘One
School – One Nation’ programme which consisted of a ‘come and try’ component
aimed at raising the profile of the sport and the facilities at the Penrith
Whitewater Stadium as well as awareness of the Championship itself. Seven schools
signed up to the ‘come and try’ sessions involving 230 children.
Approximately 2200 people attended
the Opening Ceremony organised by Penrith City Council. The Ceremony included
over 200 children from local schools and performing groups.
ii) Promotion
The event was broadcast to 60
nations with more international coverage than previous championships. Results
from SBS research shows that almost 400,000 people, in total, across Australia
watched the Championships which were broadcast between 1st and 3rd
October. International viewing figures
have yet to be received from SBS although it is estimated that the
Championships were broadcast to 100 million households. Tourism footage provided by NSW State
Government and Penrith City Council was inserted into the broadcasts.
Australian Canoeing had limited
resources to undertake a wide ranging marketing campaign and substantial
support was provided in this area by the Economic Development and City
Marketing Department (EDCM) of Council.
The Department organised and implemented an extensive marketing campaign
to support and promote the event as well as Penrith Valley as a visitor
destination. This involved:
· Distribution of Penrith Valley Information Packs to the International Federations of all competing nations.
· Developing and producing the content, and distribution of 800 ‘Welcome Gift Packs’ from Penrith City Council to all athletes, officials and overseas media.
· Development of and inclusion of event promotional editorial in the Council newsletter distributed to all households in the Penrith LGA.
· Design and production of 4 A-Frame trailer signs displayed at selected venues across the City.
· Production and arrangement of the installation of, two motorway advertising banners.
· Production and arrangement of the installation of, two High Street and Queen Street advertising banners.
· Coordination, production and installation of a city wide street banner program.
· Coordination and implementation of a three-week newspaper advertising campaign undertaken in September which included full page adverts in the Western Weekender, Penrith City Star, Penrith Press, as well as the Complete Pub and Club Guide produced by Fairfax newspapers. These adverts were also supported by editorial.
· Development and implementation of front-page coverage and editorial in the Penrith Panthers magazine.
· Collaboration with ‘Smart Saver Money Coupons’ with a circulation of 62,400 copies featured a full page story and coupon giveaway promoting the event to homes and businesses in the Penrith LGA.
· Editorial and ticket giveaways included in the Penrith City Council Newsletter, Network (staff newsletter), Penrith Valley Views and the Penrith Chamber of Commerce newsletter.
· The inclusion of Championship details on the Penrith Valley website.
· A cooperative poster/flyer campaign with Australian Canoeing to produce and distribute 15,000 A5 flyers and 2,000 A3 posters. These were distributed via promotional events including; Council Open Day, the Penrith Show, St. Marys Spring Festival and Penrith Valley Festival, as well as via the Penrith Valley Visitor Information Centre. 800 local businesses also received posters for display mainly in the CBD’s of Penrith and St. Marys.
· Facilitation of an Event Promotional activity at Council’s Open Day and St Marys Spring Festival where Australian Canoeing were provided with a designated promotional area.
· Joint participation in promotions at Penrith Plaza and Centro Nepean
· Implementation of a VIP day hosted by the Mayor on Saturday 1 October 2005 where a group of local businesses and key stakeholders were invited to a function also attended by an international delegation from Xi Cheng.
· A collaborative effort with Australian Canoeing produced a promotional pack containing details about the event and Penrith Valley to the NSW State Cabinet when they held their meeting in Council on 22nd June 2005.
· Penrith Valley Information Centre had a ‘mobile’ promotional stand at the World Championships for all four days of competition.
In addition to the Department’s efforts, Australian Canoeing generated
38 media stories about the event. In addition relationships were established
with the local media resulting in:
· Advertisements in the Penrith Press.
· Cumberland News Group organising a ticket giveaway competition for its 1.8 million readers, with 600 tickets given away as well as a whitewater rafting trip with an athlete from the Australian Canoe Slalom Team.
· An eight page wrap feature in the Western Weekender
The
Event Director (Australian Canoeing) also made presentations to the Chamber of
Commerce and met with representatives of the Penrith Valley Economic
Development Corporation to investigate how local businesses could be involved
in the event and to promote the event to them.
Australian
Canoeing also developed a website for the event which achieved 119,106 ‘hits’
in the lead up to and during the event. In addition, 289 messages were posted
on the message board.
The
Penrith Valley Economic Development Corporation developed a creative concept
and coordinated the implementation for the production of the “World’s Biggest
Kayak/Canoe Cake”. The display was
hosted by Council in the foyer of the Civic Centre.
Overall
the marketing campaign did heighten awareness of both the Championships and the
Stadium and comprehensive coverage was achieved within the resources available.
iii) Operation
In
addition to the significant contribution made by EDCM to the development and
implementation of the marketing campaign for the event, Council contributed ‘in
kind’ to the event through providing considerable operational and logistical
support to Australian Canoeing. The
Facilities Operations Department, supported by other departments such as Asset
Management and Executive Services, undertook the following range of projects:
· Event Logistic and Operational Planning
- Sourcing
equipment and suppliers, establishing and attending meetings with contractors
e.g. site infrastructure such as marquees, catering, big screen video display
board, sound and technical production.
- Providing
traffic management plan details, contacts and protocols for local services such
as the police, contacts for the RTA etc.
- Providing
event operational advice and support.
· Volunteer
Recruitment
- Dedicated
a Penrith City Council student placement to establishing and initially
implementing volunteer recruitment process.
The student subsequently became a ‘full time’ paid event employee of
Australian Canoeing.
- Provided
contact details of potential volunteer partners e.g. TAFE and coordinated
initial meetings to establish the network.
· Opening
Ceremony Development and Implementation (27 September 2005)
- Sourced
Creative Director and facilitated ongoing liaison between the Creative Director
and Australian Canoeing.
- Developed,
implemented and stage managed the Opening Ceremony.
· Sponsorship
- Coordinated
and organised ‘potential sponsors’ lunch hosted by the Mayor in the Nepean
Room.
- Arranged
and attended meetings with local businessmen in Penrith and the CEO of
Australian Canoeing which resulted in $70,000 of sponsorship being achieved.
- Provided
letters of support for funding submissions to the Government.
· Administration
- Arranging and providing meeting rooms for
Organising Committee Meetings
- General administrative support.
· Site
Infrastructure
- Arranging the provision, delivery and
‘set-up’ of Council event infrastructure equipment such as the stage from St.
Clair Recreation Centre for the Opening and Medal Ceremonies, ‘parra webbing’
fencing and crowd control barriers.
This
support from Council resulted in Australian Canoeing being; able to proceed
with operational planning more efficiently in the limited timescales that were
available to produce the event; to instigate a consolidated volunteer
recruitment process; produce a highly acclaimed opening ceremony enjoyed by all
attending; and access sponsorship not previously made available.
iv) Finance
Penrith
City Council’s contribution, financially and ‘in kind’ to the Canoe Slalom
World Championships exceeded the initial level of contribution sought ($80,000
sponsorship) by the event organisers and has been accommodated within existing
programmes and resources available.
Council
also agreed to assist Australian Canoeing with additional funding arrangements
to cover a potential shortfall in the event budget.
Recognition
Achieved
Both
Council and the Local Government Area benefited substantially from the event
through:
- Recognition
of Council’s commitment to the sport of Canoeing; support for the City’s
premier sporting venues; ability to host and facilitate world class sporting
events by the partners including NSW Major Events Board and Australian Canoeing,
as well as local organisations such as Penrith Valley Canoeing (refer to
attachments).
- International
coverage of the event and the opportunity to promote the area to overseas
visitors as well as the domestic market.
- Athletes,
officials, dignitaries and visitors staying in the local area and contributing
to the local economy.
- Providing the opportunity to the local
community to participate in the event (schools programme and opening ceremony)
thus creating greater awareness of PWS and the opportunities the facility has
to offer.
- Robin Bell, representing
Australia successfully winning a Gold Medal in the C1 Men’s event attracted
local and national media attention which focussed on the facilities at the
Penrith Whitewater Stadium, promoting the venue as one which: is unique in the
Southern Hemisphere for its international course and, has been instrumental in
the development and ultimate success of Australian paddlers.
Organising
Committee’s Post Championship Review
A
post-Championship review meeting has been held at which it was recognised by
all members of the Organising Committee attending that the event provided a
fantastic competition and was excellently organised within the resources
available.
The
Consulate General of Switzerland wrote to Australian Canoeing:
“I wish to forward the best thanks on
behalf of the Consul General, Mr Juerg Casserini and his wife, who attended the official opening ceremony on Tuesday,
27th September 2005 and on
behalf of the Deputy Consul General, Mr Roger Krull and his family, who
attended the championships on Sun, 2
October 2005. The weather was wonderful, the venue beautiful, the organisation perfect…………I had a terrific
time and wish to thank you for your generosity. I remain with my very best wishes and congratulations on this
most successful event.”
Council was commended by the Organising
Committee for the successful contribution
that it made achieving the delivery of a number of its event
objectives. Australian Canoeing have
subsequently requested that a partnership be formed whereby a ‘Festival of
Canoeing’ is developed with Penrith City Council at a future date. This will be
considered as part of Council’s Strategic Program which includes the following
Critical Action:
“Assess the
types of institutions and events that would bring Penrith Valley world
recognition and select the most appropriate”.
Furthermore early discussions have commenced
with the NSW Major Events Board regarding opportunities to integrate with their
overall strategy for events in the next few years and the possibilities to
develop other major events in our City.
Conclusion
Overall the
event was a success, there were areas identified at the review where
recommendations were made for improvement at future World Championships, in
particular the length of time prior to an event that operational and financial
planning commences. However, through the Organising Committee and the
development of good partnerships and networks, these issues were managed for
the 2005 Championships leaving Australian Canoeing and the City in a strong
position to plan future events that continue to promote the Local Government
Area and the sport of canoeing.
That the information contained in the report on ICF Canoe Slalom World Championships
2005 be received. |
1. View |
ICF
Canoe Slalom |
2 Pages |
Appendix |
5 December
2005 |
|
The City as a Social
Place |
|
The City as a Social Place
2 |
Community
Assistance Program - Planned Component 2005 |
6016/51 |
Compiled by: Joe
Ibbitson, Community Programme Coordinator
Authorised by: Erich Weller, Community Development
Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: Strategies are in place to
respond to the social and health needs of the community.
Critical Action: Support community organisations and programs to meet identified
community needs.
Purpose:
To inform Council
about applications received in the 2005 Planned Component of the Community
Assistance Program (CAP). The report
recommends that Council endorse the applications recommended for funding.
Background
Council has a Community Assistance Program through which it makes small
grants to non–profit organisations and community based groups to meet local
community needs. The maximum grant is
$1,000.
There are three eligibility criteria for applications under the
Community Assistance Program. These
are:
· Community based non–profit organisations
providing one off activities
· Direct benefit to and participation by
Penrith City residents
· Project and project management in line with
Council’s Access and Equity Policy
Fundraising programs or organisations whose
main job it is to fundraise are not eligible.
The total annual budget for the planned and rolling components of the
program is $26,000. The budget for the
planned component is $19,000.
Planned
Component ($19,000)
The funding round for the 2005 Planned Component opened on 10th October and closed on 4th November. The funding round was advertised in local papers and on Council’s web page. The funding round was also promoted through a range of local interagencies and networks.
Applicants were required to complete a simple application form
identifying their project objectives, population target groups, budget,
accessibility and benefits to the local community.
The promotion of the 2005 Planned Component followed the Community
Development Support Expenditure Scheme (CDSE) funding round in April, and the
Western Sydney Area Assistance Scheme funding round in August.
Budget
Allocation and Expenditure to Date
|
Allocated |
Expenditure to Date |
Committed |
Available |
Total annual funds |
$26,000 |
$1,930 |
0 |
$24,070 |
Planned Component |
$19,000 |
0 |
0 |
$19,000 |
Rolling Component |
$7,000 |
$1,930 |
0 |
$5,070 |
Assessment
of 2005 Planned Component Applications
All applications were assessed against the Community Assistance Program
assessment criteria for eligibility, and recommendations to fund or not fund
made accordingly.
To determine rankings consideration was given to:
· whether the applicant for community
assistance already receives significant Government funding, and whether the CAP
request is more properly seen as a core responsibility of that Government
funded program
· the size of the organisation or group, and
its capacity to access alternative resources
· the possibility of access to other sources of
funding for the request
· the willingness of the applicant to work
collaboratively with residents and other community groups
· the level of participation and direct benefit
for residents of Penrith LGA
· whether the proposal addresses the priority
needs and issues of Penrith LGA residents, as identified through social
planning processes
· whether the proposal is realistic
· the cost effectiveness of the proposal
· the beneficiaries of the project, ensuring
that funds are distributed to diverse groups right across Penrith LGA.
A total of 61 applications were received, requesting a total of
$56,258.98. Of the 61 applications
received 23 have been recommended for funding for either all of the requested
amount or an adjusted amount in light of the merit of the project. In 2004/05 Council received 47 applications
totalling $40,426.00. In this 2005/06
round the additional funding requests have required a very careful assessment
of the applications against the criteria and related considerations.
Attachment A to this report provides the list of 23 applications
recommended for funding as well as giving the rationale. Where there is a recommendation for funding
that is not the full amount requested the reason is also given in the
information for each project in Attachment A. The amount of expenditure
recommended is slightly higher than the budget of $19,000, totalling $19,060.
There are 38 applications that are not recommended for funding through
the Community Assistance Programme Planned Component, or for any other action
by Council. Details of these 38
applications are provided at Attachment B.
The following table is a summary of all projects recommended for
funding. Note that in the table
recommended applications have also been allocated to their particular
population target groups.
A list providing further details about each of the projects recommended
for funding is attached to this report (Attachment A).
Table 1 - Recommended List
No |
Target group |
Organisation |
Project Name |
Amount Requested |
Recommended Amount |
1 |
CALD |
Nepean Migrant Access Inc |
Refugee Week Celebration 2005 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
2 |
ATSI |
Penrith Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander Project (PATSI) |
Koori Cuppa Time (PATSI) |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
3 |
Disability |
Australian Foundation for
Disability |
People with Disability – Drama Classes and Performance |
$550 |
$550 |
4 |
General |
St Marys Area Community Development Project Inc. |
St Marys Creative Writing Group |
$1,000 |
$500 |
5 |
General |
St Marys Area Community Development Project Inc. |
Lets Talk Skills: how your
experiences count |
$947.85 |
$947.85 |
6 |
Children |
North St Marys Neighbourhood Centre Inc. |
Multicultural Resource – North St Marys Community Pre-School |
$966.47 |
$966.47 |
7 |
Youth |
The Richmond Fellowship of NSW – Young People’s Program |
Young People and Dual Diagnosis Resource Library |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
8 |
General |
Cranebrook Development Project (Barnardos Australia) |
Cranebrook Metropolitan Technology Centre Strategic Plan |
$966.25 |
$966.25 |
9 |
Disability |
Penrith Disabilities Resource Centre |
Fun, Food and Celebration |
$950 |
$950 |
10 |
General |
Anglicare Community Care Services Nepean |
Nepean Community Development Forum 2006 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
11 |
Disability |
Lifestart |
Literacy and Lifeskills (Equipment) |
$996.30 |
$996.30 |
12 |
Seniors |
Kingswood Neighbourhood Centre |
Games and Trivia Social Group |
$1,000 |
$583 |
13 |
General (Rural) |
Wallacia Progress Association |
N.O.W. Festival 2006 – Naming of Wallacia 100 Years Celebration |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
14 |
Disability |
Nepean Area Disabilities Organisation (NADO) |
Music Appreciation Post School Options Program |
$730 |
$730 |
15 |
Seniors |
Werrington Elderly Care |
Traymobile |
$325 |
$325 |
16 |
General |
Werrington Community Project Inc. |
Werrington Occasional Child Care Integrated Service – Family Open Day |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
17 |
Women |
Penrith Older Women’s Network |
Celebrating Six Years – Community Drop-in Centre |
$500 |
$500 |
18 |
Youth |
St Clair Youth and Neighbourhood Project Inc. |
St Clair Youth Project |
$800 |
$800 |
19 |
General |
Autumnleaf Neighbourhood Centre (SCYNT) |
“The Quiet Space” |
$849 |
$849 |
20 |
CALD |
Werrington Area Community Development Project |
Community Language Classes (Spanish and Arabic) for Children and
Young People |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
21 |
Youth |
North St Marys Neighbourhood Centre |
Southcreek Mobile Youthlinx |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
22 |
Seniors |
Nepean Food Services |
First Aid Kits for Volunteer Meal Runs |
$396 |
$396 |
23 |
Women |
Penrith Women’s Health Centre |
Video Equipment |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$19,060 |
Applications not Recommended for
Funding
Attachment B provides details of those projects not recommended for
funding.
Target Group Analysis
It is useful to summarise the recommended allocation of Community
Assistance Programme Planned Component funds and the principal beneficiary
target group for funding (see Table 2 below).
The target groups correspond to the seven mandatory target groups as
listed in the Department of Local Government Social and Community Planning and
Reporting Guidelines.
These are the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) community,
the culturally and linguistically diverse background (CALD) community, young
people, older people, people with a disability, children and women. An eighth category “general community” has
also been included in the table below.
Some of the projects could fit into more than one target group, e.g. a
project targeting women from CALD backgrounds.
Table 2 – CAP Planned Allocation
by Target Group
General Community |
32.9 |
People with a Disability |
16.9 |
Young People |
14.7 |
People from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds |
10.5 |
Women |
7.9 |
Older People |
6.8 |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People |
5.2 |
Children |
5.1 |
Total |
100% |
Summary
Council has received 61 applications requesting a total of $56,258.98 for Community Assistance Program funding in the 2005/06 Planned Funding Round. This is a high number of applications and a significant increase in the total amount requested compared to 2004/05. After careful consideration against the identified criteria, 23 projects totaling $19,060 have been recommended for funding. Projects cover a range of target groups and suburbs across the city and address priority social needs as well as including a number of city-wide initiatives.
That: 1. The
information contained in the report on Community Assistance Program - Planned
Component 2005 be received 2. Council endorse funding the recommended projects totalling $19,060
from the Planned Component of the Community Assistance Program 3. That $60.00 be re-allocated from the Rolling Component of the Community Assistance Program to the Planned Component to cover the shortfall between the total value of recommended projects detailed in this report and the $19,000.00 currently allocated to the Planned Component. |
Recommended
Applications |
7 Pages |
Attachment |
|
Applications
not Recommended for Funding |
8 Pages |
Attachment |
5 December
2005 |
|
The City as a Social
Place |
|
The City as a Social Place
3 |
Australasian
Cemeteries and Crematoria Association Conference 16-20 October 2005 |
1004/24 |
Compiled by: Mary
Thorne - Cemeteries Officer
Authorised by: Gary Dean - Facilities Operations
Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: Effective responses are made to
the social impacts of growth, redevelopment and change.
Critical Action: Assess the social impacts of urban change in both new release and
established areas and develop planned responses.
Purpose:
To report to
Council the outcome of attendance at the Australasian Cemeteries and Crematoria
Association Conference 16-20 October 2005.
The report recommends that the information be received.
Background
Council has been a member of the Australasian Cemeteries & Crematoria Association (ACCA) since 1997. Council is also a member of the Cemeteries & Crematoria Association of NSW (CCANSW). Council’s Cemeteries Officer, Mary Thorne is the current President of this organisation.
Membership of the two organisations has proven extremely beneficial. Often information of current practices, trends and legislation is not available through local government channels. Membership of ACCA extends our network across Australia, New Zealand, Asia and to its connections in Europe, Canada and the United States.
National
Conference
The National Conference was held in Brisbane in October and was attended by Mary Thorne as Council’s representative. Approximately 300 persons attended from around Australia, as well as oversees.
Held concurrently with the Conference was an exhibition of industry related products including plaques, urns, lowering devices, crematorium equipment, computer software and mapping systems. Also on display was the new stainless steel monument as shown on the ABC’s ‘New Inventors’ programme.
The conference programme had an extensive educational component with sessions on Water Management in Cemeteries, How to Use the Bookings to Backfill Manual and ‘Lift and Deepen’ practice.
The presentation on Lift and Deepen was particularly relevant. An interdepartmental Committee of NSW State Government recently produced a discussion paper ‘Burial Space in the Sydney Greater Metropolitan Area’ for comment.
Responses were sought on the problem of diminishing land available for burial and how this problem could be solved. The practice of ‘Lift and Deepen’, as currently carried out in South Australia and Western Australia enables a more intensive use of family graves and if limited tenure is introduced in NSW, the re-use of graves. The outcome of this discussion paper is still to be received. Council officers made a submission to that enquiry.
Included in the programme was an excellent workshop on scenario planning. The focus was on a hypothetical pandemic and how the cemetery and crematoria industry would respond and cope.
Conclusion
With Council on the threshold of its new and exciting endeavour at Castlereagh, membership of ACCA and NSWCCA is definitely a conduit to the latest technology and trends in the cemetery and crematoria industry.
That the information contained in the report on Australasian Cemeteries and Crematoria
Association Conference 16-20 October 2005 be received. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
5 December
2005 |
|
The City as a Social
Place |
|
The City as a Social Place
4 |
Draft Open Space
Action Plan and draft Open Space Section 94 Development Contributions Plan |
1980/10PT8 |
Compiled by: Grant
Collins - Recreational and Cultural Facilities Planner
Authorised by: Ruth Goldsmith - Local Planning
Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: The City’s recreation and leisure
facilities and services meet its needs and are optimally used.
Critical Action: Ensure facilities and services reflect the City’s diverse current and
future recreation and leisure needs.
Purpose:
To seek Council's
endorsement for the public exhibition of the draft Open Space Section 94
Development Contributions Plan, accompanied by the draft Open Space Action
Plan.
Background
The PLANS project commenced in July 2002. The project involved strategic research, City wide demographic and socio economic analysis, an audit of existing facilities and services, assessment of recreation and cultural needs, assessment of established residential areas’ infrastructure, facilities and services needs, and City wide community consultation.
From this work, two Strategies were developed – a Citywide Recreation and Cultural Facilities Strategy, and an Infrastructure, Facilities and Services Strategy for the Established Residential Areas. A Section 94 Strategy and Framework provided the basis for future funding directions.
Council adopted the final PLANS Report and Strategies on 15 March 2004. A number of Strategy recommendations have been recognised in Council’s 2005-2009 Strategic Program, and others are being delivered through Council’s existing services.
The Recreation and Open Space Working Party, on 20 April 2005, considered a report and presentation that outlined the draft Open Space Action Plan, draft Schedule of Works to be included in the Development Contributions Plan, maps by clusters of suburbs detailing the City’s Open Space network, and the Audit of the City’s Parks and Reserves. Councillors endorsed the draft work completed to date.
On 19 October 2005, the Recreation and Open Space Working Party considered and supported the policy directions and recommendations of the revised draft Open Space Action Plan and draft Section 94 Development Contributions Plan. Since that time, minor changes have recognised works that have been completed since the initial draft Plan, and cost reviews. The draft Open Space Action Plan and the draft Open Space Section 94 Development Contributions Plan are included in the Attachments to this report.
Open
Space Action Plan
A key priority of the PLANS Report and Strategies was the development of a City-wide Open Space Action Plan, based on the endorsed principle of improving the overall quality and sustainability of the City’s open space. The PLANS Report also highlighted the need to particularly improve the passive recreation opportunities in the City, and to ensure future development of more accessible infrastructure, facilities and services, to meet the growing demands of an ageing population.
The draft Open Space Action Plan incorporates the strategic directions from the PLANS Report, and provides an outline of the open space network within each of the City’s 12 ‘cluster’ areas. Development of the Open Space Action Plan involved categorising and mapping the City’s open space assets, conducting site visits and detailed investigations to establish priorities, and identifying opportunities for open space rationalisation.
The Action Plan also recognises the Regional Parklands proposed at Penrith Lakes and the ADI site, and in the Ropes and South Creek Corridors. They will provide important recreation and leisure resources in the future for both the City’s communities and its visitors, and will provide spaces and facilities that support local and broader recreation needs. Strategic directions for future recreational opportunities on these key sites were developed through PLANS consultations, and are outlined in the Open Space Action Plan.
The draft Open Space Action Plan also identifies the responsibility of developers to properly provide for their communities, in terms of active open space and local sports facilities training needs, in each release area. There are clear guidelines for developers, in the draft Open Space Action Plan, regarding the open space areas and facilities that are required, and also the quality of land that will be accepted. This will support future negotiations regarding open space provision.
Draft
Open Space Section 94 Development Contributions Plan
The PLANS Strategic Research Report identified the aspirations of the City’s communities, and responses to enhance their quality of life. One of the key responses to the survey included the importance of quality and ease of access to natural and open space areas[1]. Community perceptions strongly link the quality of, and access to, open space and natural areas to the future quality of life in the City, which highlights that this should be protected and maintained for future generations.
The Section 94 legislation requires demonstration of a ‘nexus’ between the monies being collected, and where and how they are to be spent. The basis on which contributions are collected in the current Open Space Plan is that the existing communities have contributed the majority of the land, and existing facilities and enhancements, and that the further embellishments needed are directly attributable to the new, incoming populations. It is important, in this regard, to particularly recognise the changing social profile in some of the City’s redeveloping suburbs, and this principle underpins the proposed works.
The draft Open Space Development Contributions Plan outlines the provision of, and improvements to, active and passive recreation facilities and infrastructure within the City to 2020, based on the PLANS recommendations. District facilities that are required to satisfy the needs of the City’s incoming population, including some that may be located in the City’s major new release areas, are also identified in the draft Open Space Development Contributions Plan.
In evaluating the ‘nexus’ for District Facilities, the potential for use of the City’s parks, facilities and open space by visitors and residents from neighbouring Council areas was considered. It was determined that, overall, the use of the City’s facilities by others was likely to be balanced by the use of adjoining Council area facilities by Penrith residents. An apportionment of 100% of the cost of proposed District facilities has therefore been applied to future residential development across the City.
The draft Plan identifies works and improvements at a total cost of $63,913,705 (plus 16% for design, supervision and administration) across the Open Space Network. Priorities for the works can be identified, and determined through the annual Management Plan process. The attached draft Open Space Section 94 Contributions Plan has two parts –
1. ‘District’ open space area embellishments, works and facilities, for which it is intended to collect contributions from all residential development in the City, and
2. ‘Neighbourhood’, ‘Local’, ‘Pocket’ and ‘Linear Parks / Drainage Reserves’ open space area embellishments, works and facilities, for which it is intended to collect contributions from residential development in the established, rural, and older urban areas.
Should other sources of funds towards the development of these facilities become available, amendments to the Plan can be made. This could include potential grant funding, or income from the sale of open space assets identified through the review process.
Future
Steps
Subject to Council’s endorsement, the draft Open Space Section 94 Development Contributions Plan will be exhibited, together with the Open Space Action Plan (which provides supporting information, and outlines Council’s principles for open space areas in the City) for community consultation and exhibition. It is proposed to exhibit the draft Plans for a minimum of 6 weeks from mid January 2006 to the end of February 2006. Submissions will be reviewed, changes made where required, and the finalised Open Space Action Plan and Section 94 Development Contributions Plan will then be reported to Council for consideration and adoption.
In implementing the proposed Schedule of Works, it is recommended that an initial focus should be on developing the Plans of Management for, and implementing key works (eg Universal Design Playgrounds) in, the City’s District Parks.
Conclusion
The recommendations from the PLANS research have formed the basis of the draft Open Space Action Plan and the draft Open Space Section 94 Development Contributions Plan. Following the public exhibition, the final Open Space Action Plan and Open Space Section 94 Development Contributions Plan will be presented to Council for consideration and adoption.
That: 1. The
information contained in the report on Draft Open Space Action Plan and draft Open
Space Section 94 Development Contributions Plan be received 2. That Council endorse the public exhibition of the draft Open Space Section 94 Development Contributions Plan, accompanied by the draft Open Space Action Plan 3. A further report be presented to Council following the exhibition of the draft Plan. |
Draft
Open Space Action Plan |
29
Pages |
Attachment |
|
Draft
Open Space S94 Plan |
31
Pages |
Attachment |
5 December
2005 |
|
The City as a Social
Place |
|
The City as a Social Place
5 |
Development
Application 05/0229 proposal for a detached dual occupancy at Lot 268 DP
204977 (No. 51) Westbank Avenue, Emu Plains
Applicant: Mr S & Mrs K
Harris; Owner: Mr S & Mrs K Harris |
05/0229 |
Compiled by: Karen
Kirk - Environmental Planner
Authorised by: Paul Lemm - Development Assessment
Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: Redevelopment of existing areas
contributes to safe, sustainable, affordable and satisfying living environments
and cohesive communities.
Critical Action: Work in partnership with the local community to foster understanding of
the reasons why established areas are redeveloping.
Purpose:
To enable Council
to determine a development application for construction of a detached dual
occupancy development. The application is reported to Council, as it is the
subject of a number of objections from adjoining and nearby residents. The
report recommends that the application be approved.
Background
The application
was reported to Council’s meeting of 5 September 2005, where Council resolved
to defer the matter to allow Councillors to inspect the site and meet with
concerned residents. An onsite meeting was held on Monday 14 November
2005 with Councillors, Council Officers and concerned residents to discuss the
proposed development and issues raised during the consultation phase of the
application.
Privacy to
adjoining properties was a key issue raised by concerned residents. It was
suggested by Council Officers on site that one way to address the residents
concerns, might be to mirror reverse the upper floor of the proposed dwelling.
This would reposition the bedroom dormer window. Although, it was Council
Officers view, that this bedroom would not introduce privacy issues due to its
passive use. The suggestion was made in an effort to progress the application.
The applicant was
approached with the suggestion and was unprepared to make the changes to the
proposal. The applicant was of the opinion that adjoining properties would not
be unnecessarily impacted by the location of this bedroom dormer. In an effort
to further address the residents concerns the applicant offered to treat the
window with opaque glass. Council Officers considered this a reasonable
outcome.
The application
was again reported to Council’s meeting of 21 November 2005 where Council
deferred the matter and requested a further report be brought back to Council
outlining new conditions regarding the location of the attic window and the
requirement for a 1.8m high fence.
This report
addresses the results of further discussions with the applicant.
The
Site
The subject site measures 771m² in area, and is rectangular in shape. The site is bounded with frontages to Westbank Avenue of 13.11m and to Warring Avenue of 43.92m, and is generally level. Six exotic mature trees and shrubs exist on the site. The locality is characterised by a mixture of single and two storey residences, primarily consisting of single dwellings.
The
Proposal
The proposal involves the retention of the existing two-storey dwelling and the erection of one detached attic style unit. The proposed dwelling provides two on-site parking spaces and a separate vehicular access off Warring Avenue. The proposed building is to be constructed of brick veneer walls with a tile roof.
The applicant proposes to remove one existing non-native Chinese Tallowtree (Sapium sebiferum) that is located towards the rear of the site, as part of this development. All other existing trees on the site are to be retained.
Plans of the development are included as an attachment to the report.
Community
Consultation
In accordance with Council’s Notification and Advertising DCP the application was advertised and notified from 1st March 2005 to 15th March 2005. One petition from twenty-six persons and three submissions in total were received during the period of notification. The following concerns were raised in submission and by residents attending the site meeting:
· Increased traffic in street
· Dangerous location of driveway
● Inability of existing infrastructure to cope with additional dwellings
● Bulk and scale of development in not in-keeping with surrounding area
· Frontage of proposed dwelling is not in line with other properties in Warring Avenue
· Interference with natural light into other surrounding properties yards
● Loss of privacy
● Proposal does not provide sufficient landscaping
The matters raised will be discussed in detail below.
Planning
Assessment
The application has been assessed against relevant heads of consideration pursuant to Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and the following key issues have emerged:
Sydney
Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury – Nepean River (SREP 20)
SREP 20 provides an overall direction for planning to protect the environment of the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment within which the proposed development is located. The proposal is within an established urban area to redevelop an existing residential lot. This lot is not located within a scenic corridor of the river. It is considered that the proposal would not compromise the water or scenic qualities of the river environment.
Penrith
Local Environment Plan 1998 (Urban Land) (LEP 1998)
The site is zoned Residential 2 (b) Low Density under the above instrument. The objectives of the zone are:
· ²to reinforce the importance
of the natural landscape settings and areas with heritage conservation value,
and
· to promote the
established urban and landscape character of traditional residential
subdivisions by limiting the range of permissible uses, and
· to allow a limited
range of compatible non-residential uses²
The site is located in an area of Emu Plains that is characterised by single dwellings that typically provide generous landscaped areas. Although the locality may hold considerable residential value to residents, the site has been identified as being suitable for this type of residential infill.
The development consisting of two detached dwellings located on a corner block each having a street frontage. The form of development is compatible with the existing single and two-storey dwellings within the streetscape.
On the above basis, the proposal meets the objectives of the zone by providing a variety of housing and form while complementing the traditional character of the area of the locality.
The following table summarises the proposal’s compliance with the relevant numerical standards of LEP 1998.
Criteria |
LEP Requirement |
The Proposal |
Complies |
Site Area |
750m² |
771m² |
Yes |
Building Envelope |
45º at 1.8m above boundary |
All buildings within the height plane. |
Yes |
External Wall Height |
3.5m |
3.5m |
Yes |
Landscape Area (min) |
50% |
51.1% |
Yes |
Rear Setback (min) |
6.0m |
4.0m |
No, SEPP1 submission received and discussed below. |
Solar Access |
3 hours direct sun to the windows of the living areas and neighbouring
living areas. |
The living area windows within the development receive at least 3
hours of direct solar access on 21 June. The living area windows of
neighbouring development are not adversely affected by the proposed
development. |
Yes |
Rear Setback
Clause 12.4 of the Penrith Local Environment
Plan 1998 (Urban Land) states that ‘Council must not grant consent to
development that involves the erection of a building unless:
a) ‘that building is setback
at least 6.0m from the rear boundary of the site or, in the case of a single
storey building in Zone No. 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d or 2e, at least 4.0m from the rear
boundary of the site
b) the land within the rear
boundary setback is used for the purposes of landscaped area only’
The application is accompanied by a SEPP1
objection in relation to the rear setback distances. State Environmental
Planning Policy 1 (SEPP1) – Development Standards, allows flexibility in the application of planning controls. Clause 12.4 of LEP 1998 requires a 6.0m rear setback for two storey dwellings.
In this case, the proposed attic style dwelling proposes a ground floor setback
ranging from 4.0m to 5.0m and a first floor setback ranging from 6.5m to 7.5m.
Variations to a rear setback have been supported when the first floor attic is
setback in excess of 6.0m. At the first floor level there is satisfactory
separation from adjoining sites and at the ground floor a 4.0m setback enables
provision of a turfed courtyard area of 48m². In conclusion, the proposed
variation to the setback enables satisfactory separation and landscaping within
the site, and therefore the SEPP1 request is considered to be worthy of
support.
Draft
Penrith LEP 1998 (Urban Lands) Amendment No. 17
The Environmental Planning and Assessment
Act 1979 requires Council to consider the provisions of any draft LEP in
assessing this application.
Council has prepared a draft amendment to the Local Environment Plan 1998 (Urban Lands) and Residential DCP 2000 – Volume 3. The amendments were exhibited between 11 August to 1 October 2004.
With regards to this development proposal,
the draft amendments propose to:
· Limit the external wall height of
the second dwelling on an allotment within a Residential 2 (b) Zone to 3.5m
This development application is compliant
with the requirements of the Draft LEP.
Penrith Residential Development Control Plan (DCP)
2000 Residential Land – Volume 2 Dual Occupancy Development
The following table summarises the
proposal’s compliance with the relevant provisions of the current DCP:
Criteria |
DCP requirement |
The proposal |
Complies |
Urban form |
Entrances to face the street, 4.0m wide open space corridor and
articulation of all building forms and facades. |
The entrance of the proposed dwelling faces Warring Avenue, and a
4.0m open space corridor separates the proposed and existing dwellings. Good articulation of all building forms and facades is evident. |
Yes |
Front building line (Corner site) |
5.5m for primary street frontage, 3.5m for secondary street frontage |
The site is a corner allotment, the primary street frontage has a
setback of 7.5m and the secondary street frontage meets the required 3.5m. |
Yes |
Private Open Space (min) |
30m² |
Both courtyards exceed 60m² in area |
Yes |
Car parking |
2 spaces per dwelling |
2 spaces per dwelling |
Yes |
Fencing |
1.8m (max) |
1.8m |
Yes |
Privacy
The development comprises one additional attic style dwelling, providing three bedrooms in the upper floor. Council’s DCP requirements are that the majority of the dormer windows be designed to face the internal driveway to ensure the privacy of adjoining properties is maintained.
The proposed attic style dormer windows on the northeast elevation face the street (Warring Avenue), whilst the dormer on the northwest elevation faces the side boundary. The window located on the northwest elevation of the proposed dwelling provides limited viewing to the rear courtyard, and a distance exceeding 6.0m exists between the window and the adjoining property.
Concern was raised about the location of the dormer window on the northwest elevation of the first floor. Councillors suggested at the 21 November 2005 meeting that further consideration be given to the location of the northwest elevation first floor window. The applicant is reluctant to mirror-reverse the first floor, and now proposes a “vilux” window to replace the dormer window on the northwest elevation of the first floor. This change removes the dormer window from the first floor bedroom while maintaining the original design. The applicant has agreed to make the design changes to the development, which is reflected in Special Condition 3.2.
Adjoining residents have raised concerns about privacy regarding the position of the ground floor kitchen window. Ground floor windows located on side boundaries typically do not impact on the privacy of the surrounding amenity due to common fencing between properties. In this instance it is considered as a added safeguard to address perceived privacy issues, the applicant should provide advanced screening along this boundary (special condition 3.3) and provide 1.8m fencing along all boundaries on the site (special condition 3.4).
Traffic and Parking
The proposal includes the provision of two (2) garaged car spaces for each dwelling in accordance with the DCP requirement. Additionally, the driveway of the existing and proposed dwelling would each provide at least one uncovered car space, resulting in a minimum of six car park spaces for the two dwellings, a number that clearly exceeds the minimum parking requirements of the DCP.
Council’s Senior Development Engineer has assessed the proposed car parking and the locality of the proposed driveway, to be satisfactory. The increase in traffic from this development would not have a significant impact on the surrounding road network nor the performance of the nearby intersection from which driveways are adequately setback.
The development complies with the relevant traffic and parking provisions and hence is unlikely to have significant adverse impact on the existing street network.
Drainage
A drainage plan was submitted with the application. The proposed system of stormwater disposal from this development is considered to be satisfactory by Council’s Senior Development Engineer. It should be noted that the site is not subject to Council’s Interim Policy for the development of flood liable land.
Concern was raised about the ability of the site and nearby streets to handle increased overland flow. Council’s Senior Development Engineer has reviewed this issue in more detail, and confirms that the additional dwelling will not impact on the existing drainage system or its ability to disperse excess water.
Front Setback
Concerns were raised from residents that the proposal is an over development of the site, and that the front setback of the development changes the character of the street.
The DCP establishes guidelines in relation to the minimum requirements for landscape areas, parking, courtyard areas, building envelopes, driveway widths and turning circles. The proposal complies with these standards.
With regard to the impact of the proposed front setback on the existing streetscape:
1. the proposed front setback of 3.5m for the secondary street frontage is compliant with Council’s Residential DCP
2. the proposed garage is located 5.5m from the street front as required by the DCP
The proposed dual occupancy development is compliant with the current LEP and DCP. It is also considered that the actual design and articulation of the proposed dwelling has design merit and attempts to integrate with the existing streetscape.
Residential Character
Residents have raised concern that the proposed dual occupancy would change the character of the street. It is recognised that the development will result in some change to the immediate area, however, corner allotments provide more potential for this form of development than other residential allotments. The development has two street frontages and proposes a detached single storey dwelling with varying setbacks from the street and building articulation.
It should be noted that over the past eight years the character of the immediate residential area has undergone some changes. During this time, an integrated housing development consisting of 6 x 3 bedroom units and 1 x 4 bedroom unit was approved at 64-68 Westbank Avenue (five allotments north-west of the site) and a number of two storey single dwellings and first floor additions have been approved in the surrounding streetscape.
The underlying objective of any new development is to maintain residential character. It is considered that this development does not compromise this development outcome and although it may seem a development at odds with the generic character of the immediate area, it will result in a low scale, low density form of development that utilises existing infrastructure in an effective way.
The previous report dated 5 September 2005 cited a development application at 5 Warring Avenue Emu Plains seeking approval for an integrated housing development. This development application was refused, not approved as originally reported.
Solar Access
and Overshadowing
Clause 5.7 of Council’s Residential Lands Dual Occupancy DCP requires a minimum of three hours of solar access be provided between the hours of 9am and 3pm on the 21st June to the living zones of the proposed dwellings and adjoining dwellings. In addition, 40% of the main areas of private open space must also achieve a minimum of three hours solar access between 9am and 3pm.
As part of the application the applicant submitted shadow diagrams which indicated that as a consequence of the development adjoining properties will receive at least the minimum amount of solar access required by Council’s Residential DCP.
Landscaping
During the onsite meeting, it was noted that two existing trees (Leptospermum species) located either side of the proposed driveway on Warring Avenue are of average to poor condition. It is recommended that the two existing street trees be removed as part of this development application, and be replaced with two mature plantings (see special condition 3.3).
A landscape concept plan prepared by a qualified Landscape Architect has been submitted with the development application. The plan indicates a number of proposed plantings consisting of trees and shrubs to be positioned along the northwest elevation (boundary adjoining No. 8 Warring Avenue) and along the northeast elevation (the front setback).
Section 94
Contributions
Since the application was reported to Council in September there has been a quarterly increase in Section 94 contributions. The following figures are as at 1 October 2005:
CALCULATION
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMOUNT
|
Conclusion
The proposed dual occupancy is permissible with Council’s consent and meets the aims and objectives for the 2 (b) Low Density Zone under LEP 1998.
The site, being a corner allotment is considered to be suitable for dual occupancy development, particularly in its ability to address to both street frontages and provide landscaped separation between built forms. The applicant has been prepared to amend the application in an attempt to address the concerns of residents. The issue of privacy from the upper floor dormer has seen the development change markedly. Although it is generally accepted that bedrooms do not result in substantial loss of privacy, the applicant has been willing to amend the development in order to gain approval from Council. The development will be compatible with existing development in the area and maintains the residential amenity for.
That: 1. The information
contained in the report on Development Application 05/0229 proposal for a detached dual occupancy
at Lot 268 DP 204977 (No. 51) Westbank Avenue, Emu Plains be received 2. The SEPP1 submission received by Council in
relation to the rear setback be
supported 3. The Development Application 05/0229 for a detached dual occupancy at Lot 268 DP 204977 (No. 51) Westbank Avenue, Emu Plains, be approved, subject to the following conditions Standard Conditions 3.1 A001, A008, A009, A010, A011, A039,
A042, D001, D007, D009, D010, E001, E005, G003, G004, H014, H015, H016, H041,
H022-slab level, H026, H033, H036, H037, H038, H039, I003, K001, K003, K025,
L001, L008, P002, Q001, Q005, Q010 Special Conditions 3.2 Amended plans are to be submitted to
and approved by Penrith Council prior to the issue of a Construction
Certificate that illustrates the dormer window on the north-western elevation
being replaced with a "vilux" window. 3.3 Prior to the issue of a Construction
Certificate, an amended landscape plan is to be received and approved by
Council that indicates the species type and maturity of replacement trees to
be planted along the southwest boundary of the site to ensure privacy between
adjoining dwellings, and the front setback to ensure that the site is
sufficiently landscaped with suitable plantings. 3.4 All boundary fencing of the proposed
dwelling shall be 1.8m high colourbond. 3.5 This condition is imposed in
accordance with Penrith City Council’s Section 94 Contributions Plan(s) for
Footpaths. Based on the current rates detailed in the accompanying schedule
attached to this Notice, $198.00 is to be paid to Council prior to a
Construction Certificate being issued for this development (the rates are
subject to quarterly reviews). If not paid within the current quarterly
period, this contribution will be reviewed at the time of payment in
accordance with the adopted Section 94 plan. The projected rates of this contribution
amount are listed in Council’s Fees and Charges Schedule 3.6 This condition is imposed in
accordance with Penrith City Council’s Section 94 Contributions Plan(s) for
Cultural Facilities. Based on the current rates detailed in the accompanying schedule
attached to this Notice, $261.00 is to be paid to Council prior to a
Construction Certificate being issued for this development (the rates are
subject to quarterly reviews). If not paid within the current quarterly
period, this contribution will be reviewed at the time of payment in
accordance with the adopted Section 94 plan. The projected rates of this
contribution amount are listed in Council’s Fees and Charges Schedule 3.7 This condition is imposed in
accordance with Penrith City Council’s Section 94 Contributions Plan(s) for
Open Space. Based on the current rates detailed in the accompanying schedule
attached to this Notice, $2124.00 is to be paid to Council prior to a
Construction Certificate being issued for this development (the rates are subject
to quarterly reviews). If not paid within the current quarterly period, this
contribution will be reviewed at the time of payment in accordance with the
adopted Section 94 plan. The projected rates of this contribution amount are
listed in Council’s Fees and Charges Schedule 3.8 This condition is imposed in
accordance with Penrith City Council’s Section 94 Contributions Plan(s) for
Library facilities. Based on the current rates detailed in the accompanying
schedule attached to this Notice, $720.00 is to be paid to Council prior to a
Construction Certificate being issued for this development (the rates are
subject to quarterly reviews). If not paid within the current quarterly
period, this contribution will be reviewed at the time of payment in accordance
with the adopted Section 94 plan. The projected rates of this contribution
amount are listed in Council’s Fees and Charges Schedule 3.9 All car parking and manoeuvring must
be in accordance with AS 2890 and Council’s requirements. Full details must be
submitted with the Construction Certificate. The double garage must be 5.8m
minimum internal full details must be shown with the Construction Certificate
drawings 4. Those persons who made submissions be informed of Council’s decision. |
1. View |
51
Westbank |
2 Pages |
Appendix |
5 December
2005 |
|
The City as a Social
Place |
|
The City as a Social Place
6 |
Development
Application 05/1320 proposal to use Shop No. 2 at Lot 16 DP 583184 (No. 91)
Great Western Highway, Emu Plains
Applicant: Jim Aitken; Owner:
Jim Aitken |
DA05/1320 |
Compiled by: Deepa
Randhawa - Environmental Planner, Amanda Seymour - Environmental Planner
Authorised by: Paul Lemm - Development Assessment
Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: Redevelopment of existing areas
contributes to safe, sustainable, affordable and satisfying living environments
and cohesive communities.
Critical Action: Work in partnership with the local community to foster understanding of
the reasons why established areas are redeveloping.
Purpose:
To enable Council
to consider a development application for the use of a newly built premises as
a steakhouse restaurant. In accordance
with Council's Policy where the applicant is a representative of Council the
matter is reported to Council for determination. The report recommends that the Development Application be
approved subject to the conditions of consent.
Background
Council granted development consent on 6 September 2004 for the demolition of an existing building and construction of two shops at Lot 16 DP 583184 (No. 91) Great Western Highway, Emu Plains.
On 30 June 2005, Council received DA05/1065 for the use of shop one as a real estate agent, approval was granted on 17 August 2005. The current development application proposes use of shop two as a restaurant.
The Site
The site is a long narrow block 720m² in area. It comprises two newly constructed single storey shops, one being used as a real estate office with the provision of a new formal car park area for 8 vehicles at the rear of the site. The building is located amongst a small commercial/retail strip on Great Western Highway. The shopping centre strip is a combination of restaurants, hotel, take a way food shops, commercial and retail uses.
Emu Plains Railway Station is located to the northwest of the site. A public car parking area is located to the northeast of the site. Dwellings are located to the south of the subject site.
Vehicle access to the site is thorough the adjoining public car park. Shop 2 has a floor area of 273.86m². Pedestrian access to each of the shops will be provided from the rear car park and is also available from the Great Western Highway frontage.
A location map is appended.
The Proposal
This application seeks consent for the internal fit-out to Shop No. 2 for use as a restaurant. The proposal involves:
· Seating area of 72 m² with a maximum capacity for 92 patrons
· Greeting area at the front entrance
· Fifteen booths each accommodating for four persons
· A large party area
· A kitchen and separate gas grill area
· A store room and cold storage areas
· Three toilets; all suitable for access for people with disabilities
· The hours of operation from 11am to 10pm 7 days a week
· Total seven number of employees
· Deliveries four times per week by small vans
Planning Assessment
Statutory Considerations
Interim
Development Order (IDO) 2-City of Penrith
The site is zoned 3(a) General Business under IDO 2. Restaurants are permissible use in the zone only with consent of Council.
Development
Control Plan for Emu Plains Commercial Area 1993
This Development Control Plan (DCP) applies to land at Emu Plains bounded by Old Bathurst Road, the Great Western Highway, Lamrock Street and the Western Railway line. The aims of this DCP are to provide:
· Urban design guidelines for commercial and residential developments within the areas
· Guide future traffic management and parking within the area
· Ensure the enhancement of pedestrian access within the area and ensure the physical enhancement of the area through the provision of landscaping
The majority of these aims have been address as part of the original development application for the construction of the building on the subject site. The commercial development controls under this DCP relate to the provision of street trees and places restriction of the heights of commercial developments, as such these controls are not relevant to this application. Pedestrian movements through the subject site were established under the commercial building application. The pedestrian routes established have been maintained by this application and conditions have been included to ensure that adequate security and safety measures are provided for pedestrian access.
The relevant aims for this application are traffic management and parking. These matters are discussed below.
Traffic
Management
The Development Control Plan requires that vehicular access to the precinct is provided via Billington Place and that:
· All new development within the
precinct shall be designed to provide satisfactory service vehicle access in
accordance with the Plan
· All new development within the precinct shall contribute towards the
cost of traffic management and pedestrian facilities identified within the Plan
The development application for the building (DA04/0357) included provision for all vehicular access to the site is through Council’s car park off Billington Place in accordance with the Development Control Plan. Council’s Property Development Manager has also been consulted in regards to access to the site through the public parking area at the rear of the site. No objection was raised to giving approval for unrestricted vehicular access to the property from Council’s car park.
Council’s Senior Traffic Engineer has also advised that based the RTA’s Traffic Generating Guidelines the traffic generated by the restaurant will not have any adverse impacts on the local road network or nearby intersections.
Vehicle access and pedestrian foot paving along Great Western Highway frontage are already constructed on site.
Parking
8 car parking spaces were required under this original development consent (DA04/0357) based on a Council’s parking code, for commercial premises, at a rate of 1 space per 40sqm. The two commercial premises have a combined floor space of 395.7m² and required 10 onsite parking spaces. Concession for the deficiency of 2 parking spaces was given on DA04/0357 based on the availability of parking in the surrounding public parking areas.
The Development Control Plan requires that development within the precinct shall provide on-site car parking in accordance with Council’s adopted Car Parking Code. The proposed use of Shop 2 requires 1 car parking space per 5.5m² of the seating area or 1 per 4 seats whichever is greater and then the parking rates for commercial premises under Council Parking Code. Based on the maximum capacity of 92 patrons for the restaurant, 23 on site car paces are required.
Shop 1 has a floor area of 121.88m² and requires 3 car spaces for a commercial use, which leaves 5 on-site parking spaces for the use of Shop 2 creating a deficiency of 18 on-site parking spaces.
The applicant undertook a parking survey of the surrounding parking areas during standard business hours and on a Friday, Saturday and Sunday evening between 6:00pm and 12 midnight to determine the amount of unused parking in the vicinity of the subject site. The applicant calculated that there was approximately 160 car parking spaces available for use. The results of this survey concluded that these car parking areas surveyed are used to approximately 25% of their capacity. This observation would suggest that based on the applicant’s survey results there is capacity for approximately 120 spaces within the existing car parking area.
The parking survey concluded that extra capacity was available in the surrounding parking areas including Council’s parking area at Billington Place located at the rear of the site. The applicant contends that existing car parking areas in proximity to the site are under utilised and have suitable capacity to accommodate the additional car parking generated by this development.
The parking areas surveyed included:
1) Billington
Place Council Car Park – West - This is a large car park located
immediately behind the retail outlets fronting the Great Western Highway, to
the west of Billington Place.
2) Billington
Place Council Car Park – East - This is a continuation of the western
side car park, located immediately behind the retail outlets fronting the Great
Western Highway, to the east of Billington Place.
3) Billington
Place Street Parking - Street
parking is permitted on the eastern side of Billington Place.
4) Great
Western Highway Off-street Parking - A small off-street car parking area
is located at the front of Lots 1, 2 and 3 DP 125676; 85 Great Western Highway
(the retail outlets from immediately east of the proposed restaurant site to
Billington Place), facing the Great Western Highway.
5) Great Western Highway Street Parking - Street parking is permitted on the
northern side of the Great Western Highway, from O’Donoghues Irish Pub to the
Real Estate office.
Council’s Senior Traffic Engineers confirmed that the car parking survey demonstrates that both the carparks and surrounding streets are under utilised and have more than sufficient spare capacity during the peak operating hours of the restaurant to cater for the 18 additional parked vehicles generated by the proposed development.
As there is no Section 94 Plan for the area, monetary contributions are unable to be made for the shortfall in car parking. The shortfall in car parking is unlikely to cause any adverse impacts on the immediate area due in part because there is ability for the area to absorb the additional car parking generated by the development and because of the nature of surrounding uses. The development is also unlikely to consume the entire capacity of the carpark or the car parking potential available in the area. It is therefore considered suitable for this development.
Whilst the applicant has provided a statement concerning security within the Billington Place carpark any lighting for and to the carpark should be provided in accordance with Council specifications. The applicant will need to consult with Council’s Asset Manager in relation this matter. See Special Condition 2.3.
Other Issues of the Proposal
Parent
Consent
The applicant seeks approval to occupy Shop 2, which was approved as part of DA04/0357. Recent site inspections revealed that this development is nearing completion and all conditions of consent are being satisfied. Condition 2.1 is recommended to ensure that the parent consent is fully compliant before the use commences.
It is also recommended that details of lighting, alarms and cameras are required to enable clear and direct movement through the building, and monitor unauthorized access to non-public spaces (Special Condition 2.2).
Hours of operation
The proposed is seeking to operation from 11am to 10pm, 7 days a week. There are a number of existing restaurants in this area, which have similar operating to the hours proposed in this application. The proposed hours of operation are considered to be appropriate for the locality and consistent with other businesses in the area and will allow adequate peak trading hours for this commercial site.
Signage
The applicant proposes a 1.6m x 1m external sign to be located on a post at the front of the site. Specific details of the proposed signage have not been provided. A standard condition is that recommends a separate development application be lodged with Council for the erection of a sign or advertising structure, other than an advertisement listed as exempt development.
Conclusion
The proposal for the use of Shop No 2 as a restaurant is permissible under IDO No. 2 and is considered to be consistent with the objectives of zone 3(a) General Business and the Development Control Plan for the Emu Plains Commercial Area.
The key issue associated with the use of the site as a restaurant is the shortfall in onsite parking to cater for the use. The proposed car parking for the development is considered to be adequate to cater for commercial or retail uses however does not provide sufficient onsite parking for a restaurant.
The sites location near and adjoining public parking areas give scope for the parking, which cannot be provided on the subject site, to be provided in the surrounding public parking areas. Justification for the shortfall in car spaces is considered to be acceptable given that the adjoining public car parking areas are not fully utilised. The use of the building as a restaurant will introduce a new dining outlet for residents and customers to meet at and relax. People will be drawn to the restaurant and area. This will create a sense of vitality for the commercial area that extends into the evening.
It is considered that the site is suitable for the proposed use and will not have any adverse impacts on parking or traffic in the area. It is recommended that application be approved subject to conditions.
That: 1. The
information contained in the report on Development Application 05/1320 proposal to
use Shop No. 2 at Lot 16 DP 583184 (No. 91) Great Western Highway, Emu Plains
be received 2. The Development Application 05/1320 proposal to
use Shop No. 2 at Lot 16 DP 583184 (No. 91) Great Western Highway, Emu Plains
be approved subject to the following conditions of consent: 2.1 A02f, A008 (first sentence only), A012, A021, A026 (application for adverting signs), A029 (Monday to Sunday 11am to 10 pm), A032, A039, D014, D031, E01a, E006, E008, E009, F002, H01f, H041, H006, H029, Q01F, Q006 (delete from in addition to) Special Conditions 2.2 The building shall not be occupied until all the conditions of consent DA04/0357 dated 6 September 2004 and all conditions of this consent are satisfied 2.3 Details of lights, alarms and cameras to enable clear and direct movement through the building and monitor unauthorised access to non-public spaces are required to be submitted prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate 2.4 The applicant shall consult with Council to determine the type of lighting required to illuminate the public car parking area to the rear of the site. All lighting shall be installed at the applicants cost prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate. |
1. View |
BAEP -
91 GWH |
3 Pages |
Appendix |
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
The City In Its Environment
Item Page
7 Greenhouse
Gas Reduction Plan 2005 and Water Management Plan 2005 7018/14 and 4109/36 45
8 Indian
Myna Birds 7028/4 53
5 December
2005 |
|
The City in its
Environment |
|
The City in its Environment
7 |
Greenhouse Gas Reduction
Plan 2005 and Water Management Plan 2005
|
7018/14 and
4109/36 |
Compiled by: Louise
Petchell, Sustainability Unit Co-ordinator; Krystie Race, Sustainability
Research Planner
Authorised by: Ruth Goldsmith, Local Planning
Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: Water and energy conservation
strategies are being implemented.
Critical Action: Develop and implement strategies that encourage water and energy
conservation.
Purpose:
To seek Council's
endorsement for the actions in the draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 2005 and
the draft Water Management Plan 2005, and the associated Reduction Goals.
Background
In 1999, Penrith City Council adopted the Sustainable Penrith program. In doing so, it acknowledged the emerging international view that a healthy future for our environment, our economy and our society, can only be achieved by balancing the pressures and demands of these three elements.
The NSW State Government has also shown its commitment to sustainable development by progressively enshrining the principles of sustainability into its legislation. There are now a number of Acts, some of which are critical to the operations of local government, which have introduced Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) principles. ESD is a term which generally means:
using, conserving
and enhancing the community’s resources so that ecological processes, on which
life depends, are maintained, and the total quality of life, now and in the
future, can be improved.
Council has legislative responsibilities
to consider those principles. For example, the Local Government Act now
requires that:
§ Councils,
Councillors and employees must implement sustainable development principles in
carrying out all of their responsibilities
§ Sustainable development
is part of a council’s charter, therefore its implementation is a fundamental
role of local government
§ Councils must
have regard to the principles of sustainable development when determining
applications for approval
§ A draft
management plan must consider “activities to properly manage, protect, restore,
enhance and conserve the environment in a manner that is consistent with and
promotes the principles of ecologically sustainable development”
§ Prepare an annual State of the Environment Report to monitor the condition of the environment and measures aimed at its management and repair. Recommendations arising from Councils SoE report are required to feed back into management processes to ensure that affirmative actions are taken in response to them.
Penrith Council has also adopted the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Principles for Sustainable Cities for its Sustainable Penrith Action Plan. These internationally recognised set of principles are being used to guide thinking and provide a strategy framework for action for the development of sustainable solutions.
The Sustainable Penrith Action Plan adopted in December 2003 is Penrith City Council’s plan of action towards a sustainable future for our City. It builds on Penrith City Council’s commitment to sustainability in 1999 and complements Council’s strategic planning framework. The adopted Strategic Plan 2005-2009 continues to acknowledge that the City, and the Council as a maturing organisation, can continue to move forward with the process of achieving more sustainable outcomes for our City.
Penrith City Council has been an active member of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), through its involvement in the Cities for Climate Protection™ Program (CCP), Water Campaign, Sustainability Reporting Alliance, and various pilot programs for issues, including Transport. These programs provide information, guidance and systems to assist Council and the City’s communities work towards a more sustainable future.
Penrith City Council joined the CCP program in February 2000. The program involved five Milestones to
reduce emissions at a local level. It
began with an inventory of the City’s emissions, based on 1995 figures, and
continued with the adoption of a reduction goal and an action plan to achieve
the goal. Milestones Four and Five
involved implementing the action plan and a re-inventory to evaluate
progress. We achieved Milestone Five in
July 2004.
The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Local Action Plan 2001 targeted Council’s
own emissions and prioritised energy reductions in its main office buildings,
residential greenhouse emissions, emissions from vehicles and waste reduction.
Following the completion of Milestone Five, at its Ordinary Meeting of
18 October 2004, Council resolved to participate in the CCP Plus program, a
requirement of which is to review our Greenhouse Gas Reduction Local Action
Plan 2001 and prepare a new plan.
With the ongoing pressures of drought, population growth and increased development, the need to conserve water and manage its use has been well recognized by all sectors of the community. Recent reports such as ‘The Metropolitan Water Plan – Meeting The Challenges Securing Sydney’s Water Future’ and ‘Water and Sydney’s Future – Balancing the Values of our Rivers and our Communities’ highlight the pressures being faced by both our water supplies and our waterways.
Water consumption and storage capacities are at present a critical
issue for the Sydney Region. Recent figures show that Sydney is using 106
percent of the annual sustainable yield of its water supplies, yet at the same time, our
population is growing by more than 40,000 people each year.
The environmental effects of drought, population growth and increased
development are also apparent in our waterways. The signs of this are evident
in the increased frequency of algal blooms and weed infestations, eroded
riverbanks, dry creek beds, reduced fish stock, and increased siltation.
The efforts of Penrith City Council to address these issues over the
years have been significant. Yet, recognising the need to co-ordinate these
efforts and develop a strategic approach to managing this resource, Council
resolved to join the ICLEI Water CampaignTM in December 2003.
The Water Campaign is an international freshwater management program
which aims to build the capacity of local government to reduce water
consumption and improve local water quality. It recognises that local
governments through planning powers, spending policies and community and
business links can influence households and businesses.
The Water Campaign is a program of the International Council for Local
Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), which was launched at Global Cities 21™
ICLEI World Congress in June 2000 as a strategic approach to water management
in the Local Government sector.
This report outlines the processes in preparing both the draft
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 2005 and the draft Water Management Plan 2005,
and seeks support for the recommended actions.
The report also addresses the implementation of the Plans.
1. Preparation of the draft Plans
The draft Plans have been developed with the assistance of key players in water and energy management, and sustainability both within and external to Penrith City Council. This has involved consultation with representatives from ICLEI, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the Sydney Water Corporation, and staff from Council Departments including Environmental Planning, Building Approvals and Environment Protection, Waste and Community Protection, Asset Management, Design and Technical Advice, Financial Services, and Parks Construction and Maintenance.
It has
required the investigation of current water and energy usage by both Council
and the City’s communities, analysis of the policies and programs currently in
place to manage energy consumption, water use and water quality, the
identification of opportunities for improvement, and the setting of goals for
energy and water conservation and water management that are both relevant and
achievable.
The Plans consolidate much of the work already undertaken by Council regarding energy and water management, and the integration of sustainability principles. They assist in delivering key objectives in Council’s Strategic and Management Plans, including –
~ Documenting
Council’s commitment to the principles of sustainability and the protection of
the City’s environment
~ Demonstrating
Council’s leadership in addressing the need for proper management of
non-renewable resources, and
~ Recognising the
links between Council, the City’s communities, and other stakeholders through
shared environmental, social and economic systems and structures, and providing
opportunities for the development of partnerships to deliver sustainable
outcomes.
The Plans are consistent with, and support, a range of other State
Government and Council plans and policies, including –
~ The Metropolitan
Strategy
~ The Metropolitan
Water Plan 2004
~ The
Hawkesbury-Lower Nepean Catchment Blueprint
~ BASIX
~ Stormwater
Management Plans
~ Water
Conservation and Re-Use Programs
~ On-Site Sewage
Management Strategy
~ Enhanced
Environmental Program (EEP)
~ Sustainable
Penrith Education Policy, and
~ Relevant
Development Control Plans.
The State Government, under the Energy Administration Amendment (Water
and Energy Savings) Act 2005, is also requiring all councils to develop a Water
Savings Action Plan by 31 March 2006, and an Energy Savings Action Plan by 30
September 2006. These Plans are
required to identify actions to reduce water and energy consumption at each of
council’s ten major sites, which will be monitored.
Whilst both Plans were initially prepared to fulfil the requirements of
ICLEI’s CCP Plus Program and Water Campaign, the significant analysis and
research that underpins the current process means that Council can build on
that information and understanding in developing the State Plans, which may be
developed as supplements to the draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 2005
and the draft Water Management Plan 2005. This ensures consistency and a level of integration with the
Plans, and also places Council in a good position to seek funding opportunities
earlier than other councils.
2. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 2001
Council joined the CCP program in February 2000. That program involved five Milestones to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions at a local level. It began with an inventory of the City’s emissions, based on 1995
figures, and continued with the adoption of a reduction goal and an Action Plan
to achieve the goal. Milestones Four
and Five involved implementing the Action Plan, and a re-inventory to evaluate
progress. Council achieved Milestone
Five in July 2004.
Following the completion of Milestone Five, at its Ordinary Meeting of
18 October 2004, Council resolved to participate in the CCP Plus program. One requirement of CCP Plus was a review of
Council’s existing Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan, to ensure it continued to
appropriately target areas where emissions, or emissions growth, were most
significant. This has resulted in the
new draft ‘Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 2005’.
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 2005
Milestone Five provided Council with the opportunity to
assess progress towards its reduction goal, and to reassess the strategic
direction of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. It also provided a valuable opportunity to highlight Council’s
achievements, and to evaluate key learning areas. Although a large increase from the 1995 base year emissions was
recorded, Council has the opportunity to use this result as a positive change
agent within its operations. By
recognising potential future energy spends and emissions, Council can set in
place future policies and actions, in the short to long term, that will not
only stabilise and then reduce emissions, but also provide significant
financial savings.
The draft Greenhouse
Gas Reduction Plan 2005 (attached) sets out Council’s progress to date in
reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and indicates where improvements are needed
to ensure the continued success of our greenhouse programs. This Plan documents a range of measures to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions, targeting areas where emissions or emissions
growth are most significant, as well as areas where abatement potential is
greatest.
The Action Plan
sets seven specific objectives to assist Council and the City’s communities to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and specifies the actions needed to reach
these objectives. The objectives and
associated actions focus on fostering knowledge and understanding of greenhouse
issues, and limiting greenhouse gas emissions, and include –
~ Profiling
Penrith’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions
~ Understanding
and Communicating Climate Change and Its Impacts
~ Partnerships for
Greenhouse Action
~ Efficient and
Sustainable Energy Use and Supply
~ Efficient
Transport and Sustainable Urban Planning
~ Greenhouse Sinks
and Sustainable Land Management
~ Greenhouse Best Practice in Industrial Processes and Waste Management.
The Plan establishes a reduction goal, which is a
quantitative objective that demonstrates a strong commitment from Council, and
raises community awareness about greenhouse issues. Council’s existing reduction goal (to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions 25% on 1995 levels by 2010) was adopted in 2001, and is known as a
flat rate goal. A flat rate goal gives
Council certainty regarding the specific amount of greenhouse abatement that it
is aiming to achieve. It also provides
recognition that an overall decrease in greenhouse emissions is necessary to
curb the effects of global climate change.
However, this does not take into consideration the City’s projected
population growth and the increase in the number of assets and buildings, in
response to the growing demand for services.
The review of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan provided
Council with an opportunity to re-commit to a goal to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. To better reflect emission
data in light of this projected growth, a revised per capita bridge goal is
proposed. The new goal is proposed as –
Stabilisation of per capita greenhouse gas
emissions by 2010, with a 25% reduction by 2015, based on 1995 levels.
This approach reaffirms Council’s strong commitment to emission reduction, while ensuring the approach is practical and the goal is attainable, through the quantification of the implemented actions. This approach recognises Council’s challenge of managing the pressures of population growth, and allows time for the implementation of sufficient projects to stabilise, and then reduce, greenhouse emissions. It is important to note that Council’s commitment to a 25% reduction will still lead to an overall decrease in emissions from the base year.
3. Water Management Plan 2005
In December 2003, Council joined the ICLEI Water Campaign, which is an international freshwater management program that aims to build the capacity of local government to reduce water consumption and improve local water quality. Similar to the CCP program, the Water Campaign is based on the achievement of a series of Milestones that identify, evaluate and respond to water management challenges. These Milestones include –
Milestone 1. Assessment of current consumption patterns and water quality
Milestone 2. Establishing goals to reduce consumption and improve water quality
Milestone 3. Adoption of a Local Action Plan to achieve the set goals
Milestone 4. Implementation and measurement of the Local Action Plan
Milestone 5. Monitoring and evaluation of the actions implemented.
Council completed Milestone 1 in September 2004.
Since that time, Council has been working to develop its Water
Management Plan to provide a strategic direction for improved water management
practices, both within Council’s own operations and throughout the community as
a whole. Adoption of this Plan, and the
water management goals contained within it, will enable Council to satisfy the
requirements of Milestones 2 and 3.
The Water Management Plan 2005 (attached) details a range of actions to reduce water consumption and improve water quality. The basic goal of the Plan is to focus efforts on reducing water consumption and improving water quality, whilst also demonstrating the commitment of Council to address these issues.
Recent water conservation initiatives both
within Council (Every Drop Counts) and external to Council (eg mandatory water
restrictions and BASIX) have highlighted both the need and potential for water
conservation measures to reduce potable water use. The water management goals outlined below are quantitative objectives
for the local Action Plan.
To reduce Council’s corporate water
consumption by 15% by 2011, based on 2001/2002 levels.
To reduce Penrith’s residential water
consumption by 20% per capita by 2011, based on 2001/2002 levels.
To reduce Penrith’s non-residential water
consumption by 15% per property by 2011, based on 2001/2002 levels.
The purpose of these
goals is to focus Council’s efforts on reducing water consumption and improving
water quality, whilst also demonstrating the commitment of Council to address
these issues.
These goals are
considered both reasonable and achievable, and they support the State
Government’s ‘Water and Sydney’s Future’ strategic directions of a 15%
reduction in water usage by government.
The goals are also consistent with our participation in the ‘Every Drop
Counts’ program, in which Council chose to adopt a goal of 10%. That was easily achieved, and subsequent
monitoring and water efficiency audits of the relevant sites indicated
reductions in consumption of between 15% and 56%.
The ICLEI Water
CampaignTM also seeks the adoption of a water quality improvement goal,
which is –
To implement actions to the value of 60
points from both the ICLEI Corporate and Community Water Quality action cards
by 2011.
In accordance with the
ICLEI Water Campaign framework, Council is required to achieve a minimum of 50
points from the Water Campaign Action Card by a set year. The Action Card lists
a variety of actions that Council can choose from in order to improve water
quality within the catchment area. Council may choose to set a higher bar for
itself by achieving above 50 points. A goal of 60 points has been set, as of
the many actions within the Action Card have recently been initiated by
Council. The actions have been recognised as valuable to the overall aim of
improving local water quality and are consistent with Council’s current focus
on achieving improvements to water quality.
Budget
and Staffing Implications
Coordination and implementation of the Plans will
continue to be the overall responsibility of Council’s Sustainability Unit,
with Department Managers taking individual responsibility for the delivery of
actions relating to their areas of operation.
The Plans have been discussed with Managers, and agreement reached
regarding the inclusion of identified actions in existing services and programs
and, where necessary, the introduction of specific projects or tasks for
recognition in future Management Plans.
Funding for the implementation of individual
actions will either be managed through existing services, or sourced from a
range of budgets, including the Enhanced Environmental Program, Sustainability
Revolving Fund, and grant funding, depending on the nature of the works
involved, the responsible parties and the expected outcome. Some existing budgets may need to be revised
(through the Project Evaluation process) to include specific initiatives,
following the adoption of the Plans.
Many of the actions contained in the Plans are expected
to result in financial savings, by means of reduced consumption and maintenance
costs, as well as enabling access to significant grant funds and
sponsorship. In 2004/2005 these have
included –
ü $8,800 grant through Australian Greenhouse Office (2004)
ü $20,000 grant through Department of Environment and Conservation (2004)
ü $8,800 grant through Australian Greenhouse Office (2005)
ü $5,000 sponsorship from Integral Energy (2005)
ü $708,000 Hot Water System retrofit program
through the Local Government and Shires Association, Country Energy, and
Quantum Pty Ltd (2005), which will also save up to 90% in running costs.
Conclusion
Climate change already touches every corner of the
planet and every aspect of people’s lives.
As our global temperature increases, its impacts will become even more
extreme. The United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change, agreed by 180 nations, makes it clear that every
country must take action to prevent global warming. Its first legal step towards this aim (the Kyoto Protocol) is now
in force, although it is generally accepted that this is not enough. Much more needs to be done to cut greenhouse
gas emissions and reduce water consumption.
The initiatives of Council to reduce energy consumption
and greenhouse gas emissions, and to reduce water use and protect local water
quality, have been significant over the past few years. This demonstrates Council’s commitment to environmental
management and taking action on climate change.
The draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 2005 and the draft Water Management Plan 2005 will provide an important opportunity for Council and the City’s communities to significantly reduce energy and water consumption, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve water quality, and tackle climate change. The severity of the current drought, recent concerns relating to the continued health of the Hawkesbury – Nepean River and the potential for these conditions to persist only highlights the need for Council to continue to pursue further initiatives to manage precious water resources.
These Plans are another step forward in formalising Council’s position, and highlights the tremendous opportunities to improve people’s lives while tackling major issues. There are social, environmental and economic advantages in the recommended actions, which would be worth pursuing even if global warming and water conservation were not major issues. In every case the costs of action are minimal compared to the costs of inaction.
That: 1. The
information contained in the report on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 2005 and
Water Management Plan 2005 be received 2. Council endorse the attached draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 2005 3. Council endorse the attached draft Water Management Plan 2005 4. Council endorse the Reduction Goals outlined in this report, being a. Stabilisation of per capita greenhouse gas emissions by 2010, with a 25% reduction by 2015, based on 1995 levels b. To reduce Council’s corporate water consumption by 15% by 2011, based on 2001/2002 levels. c. To reduce Penrith’s residential water consumption by 20% per capita by 2011, based on 2001/2002 levels. d. To reduce Penrith’s non-residential water consumption by 15% per property by 2011, based on 2001/2002 levels. e. To implement actions to the value of 60 points from both the ICLEI Corporate and Community Water Quality action cards by 2011 |
Greenhouse
Gas Reduction Plan 2005 |
40
Pages |
Attachment |
|
Water
Management Plan 2005 |
25
Pages |
Attachment |
5 December
2005 |
|
The City in its
Environment |
|
The City in its Environment
8 |
Indian Myna
Birds |
7028/4 |
Compiled by: Barry
Ryan, Waste and Community Protection Manager
Authorised by: Barry Ryan, Waste and Community
Protection Manager
Requested By: Councillor Kevin Crameri
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: The City’s biological diversity
is being protected and conserved through the implementation of a biodiversity
conservation and bushland management strategy.
Critical Action: Undertake biodiversity conservation and protection and pursue the
effective management of natural areas.
Purpose:
To provide further
information to Council on the trapping of Indian Myna Birds. The report
recommends that the information be received.
Background
Indian Myna birds are recognised as a common pest that is causing considerable damage to the environment, in addition to concern being raised as to their nesting habits in roofs of houses and other structures.
The NSW Department of Primary Industries confirm that Mynas cause damage to fruit and grain crops and create aesthetic and possible human health concerns.
The Australian National University confirms that Indian Mynas are a serious ecological problem and are endangering native birds in many urban and urban-rural fringe areas in Eastern Australia.
During Autumn 2004, Environment ACT collaborated with a researcher from the Australian National University in a trial to determine whether these birds could be successfully removed from the urban area using a humane trapping technique. Whilst a number of birds were trapped it does not appear that the technique used was capable of achieving a sustained reduction in numbers. Therefore, trapping has been discontinued.
Current Situation
Discussions have been held with staff from the ACT Government involved in trials utilising Myna bird traps, in conjunction with the Australian National University. The trial involved 10 urban properties setting up traps in their backyard with trapping occurring once a week.
This trial revealed that the traps were effective in trapping Indian Mynas (~6 birds per week, per trap). However, they were extremely labour intensive requiring one full day of labour per week, and there were problems with the cost of humane extermination of large quantities of birds. It was concluded that this system was not a feasible control method due to the large populations and the migratory nature of the pest. Using small traps on a local level without co-operative action on a regional level is largely ineffective.
The ACT Government is now focussing efforts on behaviour change in the local community, educating residents to encourage native vegetation and feed pets inside.
Dr Chris Tidemann of the ANU is continuing research in this field and is currently working on a larger scale-trapping program in Cairns.
If Penrith Council provided traps to individual premises, there are a number of issues to consider:
· A significant numbers of traps would be required to provide an effective service (traps are approximately $400 each)
· From the advice received, handing out traps on an individual basis (i.e., to individual properties) would be relatively ineffective
· An operational program to collect, humanely destroy and dispose of the trapped birds would be required at significant cost.
· Unless a regionally co-ordinated approach was taken, such a local program would be largely ineffective at reducing the population of Indian Myna birds
· It is unlikely that residents will be willing to humanly euthanaise the trapped birds and Council will be expected to provide this service.
The Department of Primary Industries identifies the methods of humanly euthanaising the trapped birds, however their guidelines warn that, as traps are not target specific other species of birds may be caught. Any birds that are caught may be injured and must be treated appropriately; therefore constant monitoring of the traps is required.
The Department of Primary Industries also advise that care must be taken when handling bird species (especially pest species) as they may carry diseases such as psittacosis, salmonellosis and other diseases that can affect humans and other animals. The Department of Primary Industry also recommends that operators of bird traps are immunised against tetanus in the event of a scratch or bite, and wear suitable protective equipment.
The migratory nature of the birds makes the issue a regional if not State-wide problem. Unfortunately there is no co-ordinated program being conducted by the NSW Government to address the problem.
Council recently presented the following motion for consideration at the Local Government and Shires Association conference –
That the Local Government Association requests action by the State
Government to reduce the impact of Common Indian Myna birds by eradicating the
species along the east coast of Australia where they currently
proliferate. It is the Local Government
Association’s view that a State Management Plan be designed, implemented,
monitored and funded by the State Government to control the species.
The motion was overwhelmingly supported by the conference, and the Association will now action this motion.
Meanwhile, Council is undertaking or planning a number of activities, which will favour native fauna in preference to introduced species such as the Indian Myna including:
· Biodiversity conservation and protection on public lands
· Encouraging the conservation of native vegetation through conservation agreements on private properties
· Identifying and protecting a Citywide system of Natural Area Reserves
· Bush regeneration and rehabilitation activities
· Protection of native vegetation in rural areas through compliance programs and action to prevent illegal land clearing.
· Council’s Landscaping DCP for new development encourages the use of
native species.
· Educational material and information about Bushcare and the importance of native vegetation
Conclusion
The migratory nature of the birds makes the issue a regional if not State-wide problem. Unfortunately there is no co-ordinated program being conducted by the NSW Government to address the problem.
It is considered that the motion recently supported at the Local Government and Shires Association, that seeks the design, implementation, monitoring and funding of a State Management Plan by the State Government to control the species, provides a more comprehensive approach to the potential solution.
That the information contained in the report on Indian Myna Birds be received. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
The City Supported by Infrastructure
Item Page
9 David
Road, Emu Plains DA/19 59
10 Road
Infrastructure Priority List (9011/55;
MA/02 Pt7; 34/12) 62
11 Rural
Fire Brigades Grant Funding 1033/4 69
12 Penrith
VRA Rescue Squad 1101/1 Pt 4 71
5 December
2005 |
|
The City Supported by
Infrastructure |
|
The City Supported by Infrastructure
9 |
David Road, Emu
Plains |
DA/19 |
Compiled by: Hans
Meijer - Asset Systems Engineer
Authorised by: David Burns - Asset Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: An asset management strategy is
in operation for civil infrastructure that optimises its use and maintains it
to agreed standards fit for its contemporary purpose.
Critical Action: An Asset Management Strategy for Civil Assets is developed, maintained
and implemented.
Purpose:
To recommend the
partial closure of David Road Emu Plains, and seek authorisation for the
Property Development Manager to arrange the legal closure and disposal of the
section of David Road to be closed.
Background
McPhee Kelshaw, Solicitors and Conveyancers, on behalf of Decorative Technologies Group Pty Ltd, the previous owners of Lot 113 DP1028283 (No 64) David Road, Emu Plains have approached Council with a request that part of David Road be closed (refer to attached plan) and that negotiations commence for the sale of that portion of David Road to be incorporated into Lot 113 DP1028283 (No 64). The ownership of the adjoining properties is also shown on the attached plan.
The eastern side of David Road, Emu Plains is currently constructed from Old Bathurst Road to a cul-de-sac 420m from Old Bathurst Road. The western side of David Road is not constructed and the adjacent land is undeveloped. The land on the western side of David Road (Lot 2 DP534504) is currently undeveloped.
The Development Services Unit have advised that a Development Application (DA05/0375) has recently been lodged by PacLib Industrial and approved by Council for the subdivision of Lot 2 DP534504. Works conditioned to be included are the construction of the western side of David Road and kerb and gutter works along the frontage on Old Bathurst Road. The section of David Road proposed to be closed is not required for access as part of the subdivision of Lot 2 DP534504.
Current
Situation
In a letter received by Council on 9 November 2005, Sydney Caravan and Camping Centre have informed Council that they are the new owners of Lot 113 DP1028283 (No 64) David Road, Emu Plains. The letter states that “we have no objections to the closure and would be interested in purchasing this land if it becomes available”.
The proposed partial closure of David Road, as shown on the attached map A, was advertised in September 2005. No responses were received showing interest in the end usage of the land. Integral Energy, Agility, Telstra and Sydney Water have advised that they have no objections to the closure.
This section of David Road recommended for closure is not required for road purposes and can be closed.
That: 1. The
information contained in the report on David Road, Emu Plains be received 2. The section of David Road, shown on the attached plan, be legally closed 3. The property owner of Lot 113 (64) be advised of Council’s resolution on the proposal to close this section of David Road 4. A further report be submitted to Council on the future use of this section of David Road, if Council resolves to agree with the proposed closure. |
1. View |
Plan
for David Rd, Emu Plains |
1 Page |
Appendix |
5 December
2005 |
|
The City Supported by
Infrastructure |
|
The City Supported by Infrastructure
10 |
Road
Infrastructure Priority List |
(9011/55; MA/02 Pt7; 34/12) |
Compiled by: Walter
Sinnadurai, Transportation Planner
Authorised by: Craig Ross, Design and Technical
Advice Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: A program of prioritised works
has been developed and is being implemented in partnership with the State
Government to maintain the efficiency of major roads as demand grows.
Critical Action: Press the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources
and the Roads Traffic Authority to implement the findings of the Penrith
Arterial Roads Study, in particular the inclusion of the existing deficiencies
in the RTA program and the future upgrades in developer agreements with the
release area proponents.
Purpose:
To seek Council's
endorsement to the road infrastructure prioritised list based upon the Penrith
Arterial Roads Study. The report
recommends that Council endorse the prioritised list and forward it to the
Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) for their consideration.
Background
Council, in conjunction with the Roads and
Traffic Authority, has developed the Penrith Arterial Roads Study (PARS). This study is a component of the broader Integrated Transport and Land Use Study that
Council has been pressing government and the agencies to advance for some
time. The PARS addresses the road
network capacity and deficiencies; the transport elements are to be dealt with
in the broader study.
Council
received a report on the status of the PARS at its Ordinary Meeting on 4 April
2005, and had a presentation of the study at a Councillor Workshop on 20 April
2005.
The study
identifies the improvements required to bring the existing network up to a
satisfactory level of service (Existing Deficiencies). The study also identifies the network
improvements required to satisfy the additional traffic demands from the
projected growth in the LGA (to 2016) to maintain the same level of service. An apportionment methodology has also been
developed to identify the percentage that each release area is contributing to
the need for the future upgrades.
The study
has made some assumptions regarding the future network. The modelling allows for the Erskine Park/M7
link road and Stage 1 of the Werrington Arterial, even though there are no firm
commitments to advance these projects.
The study has been used in the formulation of Developer Agreements for the ADI, Lakes Environs and Penrith Lakes developments.
Issues that have been identified in the progress of the study and the advancement of the Developer Agreements include:
· The lack of a firm commitment from government to fund the existing deficiencies in the network. These upgrades may be a prerequisite to the network capacity to accommodate future upgrades required by the growth in the area.
· The lack of a funding strategy to delivery the future upgrades to meet the demands being placed on the network by the future growth. The Developer Agreements secure the developer’s share of funding for these upgrades, however, this will only part fund the works. Additionally there will be instances where full development has not occurred creating a cash flow problem that will require a “banker” to fund any shortfalls.
· The government’s current constraints in providing commitments for future year’s budgets.
On 28 June 2005, Council hosted the NSW Cabinet Meeting at the Penrith Civic Centre. This visit provided an opportunity for the above issues to be raised with the Minister for Roads (then the Hon Michael Costa).
The Minister acknowledged the work done in the PARS and the input provided by the RTA in the study. To enable further consideration of Council’s request for the network upgrades to be advanced, the Minister requested that a prioritised list of projects be provided by Council to the RTA. The Authority would then prepare cost estimates for the works and provide further advice to the Minister.
This position has also been confirmed in correspondence from the current Minister for Roads, the Hon Joe Tripodi. This correspondence mentioned that the RTA would investigate the costing for the top three projects in Council’s list.
Current Situation
As indicated above the PARS identified both the existing deficiencies in the network and the upgrades required for future growth. The timing and the priority of the latter will, to a large extent, be driven by the development of the release areas in the LGA, ie the growth will determine the demand.
The requirement for the upgrading of the existing deficiencies is not dependent on the release area program.
The existing deficiencies and the future upgrades identified in the study are listed as follows:
Existing Network Deficiencies &
Proposed Improvements
Location |
Network Improvement |
|
|
2004 - Existing Deficiencies |
|
Great Western Hwy / Parker St |
Installation of dual right turn bays will increase the intersection
capacity and improve operation.. |
Great Western Hwy / Castlereagh Rd / Jane St |
2004: Do nothing. The existing intersections of Castlereagh
Rd with GWH and Jane St operate satisfactory excepting for the movement of
vehicles between GWH and Jane. It is
considered the intersection will show no further deterioration till
developments north of the town centre are released. |
Leonay Pde / M4 WB Off Ramp |
Reconstruction of traffic signals and the introduction of a dual right
turn from the M4 offload ramp at the site (no bridge duplication) |
Great Western Highway and Bennett Road |
Provision of a 60 m dual right turn bay is recommended |
Mamre Road and M4 WB Offload Ramp |
Provision of a dual right turn bay and exclusive left turn lane from
the offload ramp onto Mamre Road |
Great Western Highway and Old Bathurst Road |
Provision of dual left turn lanes from Bathurst Street. Introduction
of a dual 120 metre long right turn bays from Great Western Highway, WB, into
Bathurst Street |
Mulgoa Road and Glenmore Parkway |
Reconstruction of the existing roundabout to facilitate a northbound
slip lane in Mulgoa Road for through traffic |
Future Network Upgrades
|
|
2004 - 2006 |
|
The Northern Road and
Glenmore Parkway |
Removal of existing roundabout and installation of traffic signals |
Cranebrook Road, Andrews
Road and Castlereagh Road |
Removal of existing roundabout, civil reconstruction and installation
of traffic signals |
Palmyra Avenue and St Marys
Eastern Village Northern Access |
Construction of traffic signals at the St Marys Eastern Village,
northern access |
Forrester Road and Palmyra
Avenue |
Removal of existing roundabout and installation of traffic signals |
Forrester Road and Links
Road |
Removal of existing roundabout and installation of traffic signals
with right turn bays |
Forrester Road and Christie
Street |
Removal of existing roundabout and installation of traffic signals
with right turn bays |
Cranebrook Road –
Cranebrook Road Deviation to Andrews Road |
Widen to 6 lanes |
Castlereagh Road – Andrews
Road to Jane Street |
Widen to 6 lanes |
Castlereagh Road and Jane
Street |
Jane Street extension from Castlereagh Road, westbound, to Great
Western Highway at Neale Drive with right turn from Castlereagh Road,
southbound, to Jane Street extension, westbound |
Castlereagh Road, Mulgoa
Road and High Street |
Banning of right turn from Castlereagh Road, southbound, to Great
Western Highway, westbound, in conjunction with the construction of the Jane
Street extension |
Great Western Highway and
Mamre Road |
Reconstruction of traffic signals at the intersection of Mamre Road
and Great Western Highway |
Werrington Road and
Dunheved Road |
Removal of roundabout and installation of traffic signals |
2006 - 2011 |
|
Werrington Arterial (Stage
1 - RTA Funded) |
Construction of a four lane arterial road between M4 Motorway and
existing Werrington Road and Great Western Highway traffic signals |
Werrington Road |
Construction of localised widening to four lanes between Dunheved Road
and Parkes Ave |
The Northern Road and
Bradley Street |
Installation of a 2 lane circulating roundabout |
The Northern Road –
Glenmore Parkway to Bradley Street |
Widen to 4 lanes |
The Northern Road, north of
Andrews Road |
Installation of traffic signals at the southern access to the St
Marys, Western Village |
The Northern Road and Borrowdale
Road |
Installation of traffic signals at the northern access to the St
Marys, Western Village |
The Northern Road –
Borrowdale Way to Andrews Road |
Widen to 4 lanes |
The Northern Road – Andrews
Road to Coreen Avenue |
Localised intersection widening |
Parker Street and Coreen
Avenue |
Installation of a dual right turn bay, southbound in Parker Street, at
Coreen Avenue |
Christie Street – Forrester
Road to South Creek |
Widen to 4 lanes |
Andrews Road – Castlereagh
Road to The Northern Road |
Widen to 4 lanes |
2011 - 2016 |
|
Great Western Highway and
Parker Street |
Duplication of the rail overbridge to permit a 7 lane southbound
approach in Parker Street. Land
acquisition on Parker Street is required between Great Western Highway and
Cox Avenue to enable lane transition |
Mulgoa Road and Jamison
Road |
Removal of existing roundabout and installation of traffic signals |
Coreen Avenue – Castlereagh
Road to Richmond Road |
Widen to 4 lanes |
Of the above list the following additional comments are made:
Werrington Arterial
The PARS has identified that the southern section of the Werrington Arterial will provide relief for the current congestion that is occurring on the Mamre Road/M4 interchange by diverting a significant amount of traffic with its origin/destination to the north of the Motorway.
A concern has been raised that the upgrade of the Mamre Road/M4 interchange, as a short-term solution, might well advance at the expense of Stage 1 of the Werrington Arterial. Council has previously submitted to the Minister that this short-term solution would very quickly require further network upgrades such as the Mamre Road/Great Western Highway intersection. This upgrade would be extremely costly, potentially requiring property acquisition and building removal, and would not provide the same strategic benefits as the development of the Werrington Arterial.
The Stage 1 construction of the Werrington Arterial from M4 to just north of Great Western Highway, would improve access from the M4 to the University/TAFE, the proposed WELL development and the industrial developments in the Dunheved Business Park. In addition, it would improve the existing delays at the Mamre Road/Great Western Highway intersection, as well as reducing the need to duplicate the Mamre Road/M4 bridge to address congestion at that location.
Council, at its meeting on 4 April, 2005 resolved to support both the Werrington Arterial and the Mamre Road/ M4 interchange projects.
Erskine Park Arterial
The Journey to Work issue that faces Penrith residents has been a longstanding concern for Council. To address this problem Council has been seeking, amongst other initiatives, provision of local employment opportunities that would reduce the need for the Penrith workforce to commute long distances for employment.
The Erskine Park Employment Area is one such area that will offer significant benefits to the residents of the LGA. The viability of this estate can be enhanced with the provision of a link road connecting Mamre Road and the proposed M7. Such a connection would also benefit the SEPP59 Lands, which are also employment-generating developments in the Blacktown LGA.
Planning of the Erskine Park Employment Area has made provision for the link road through that estate and its funding has been included in the S 94 plan for the estate. Council has made submissions to the relevant State Agencies and to Blacktown City Council to accommodate the arterial link through the SEPP59 Lands. There has also been deputations to Minister Knowles and Minister Sartor on this project.
The proposals put to the Minister have been structured around a funding solution involving developer contributions. Minister Costa, at the cabinet visit, gave a commitment that the RTA would be the construction authority for the road (in Blacktown LGA).
Notwithstanding that the link road has been announced by the Premier, there is still no formal acceptance of the route alignment nor commitment to its construction.
This matter is being considered by the Minister for Planning and a high priority from Council on this project to the Minister for Roads might expedite Minister Sartor’s decision.
Jane Street Extension - Castlereagh Road/Great
Western Highway/Jane Street
The close proximity of the Great Western Highway/Jane Street intersection and Mulgoa Road/Castlereagh Road leads to mutual queuing interferences and both intersections are operating at capacity. This over-saturation is caused through high vehicle volumes and poor alignment with Jane Street. Further major urban development in the local area would put further pressure on theses intersections and would also require further improvements, to meet future population growth demands.
The RTA has developed a concept plan for the construction of a new road link between the Great Western Highway, near Bruce Neale Drive, and the Jane Street/Castlereagh Road intersection.
There are no effective short-term upgrades that would address the problems generated by the existing traffic at these intersections. The solution rests with the ultimate upgrade to accommodate the growth in the area. Notwithstanding this there is a need to address this problem now.
Mamre Road
Bridge Over the M4
Mamre Road currently forms an important link between the St Marys area and residential areas to the south of the M4 and linkage to the M4. The existing traffic congestion could be addressed, in part, by the duplication of the bridge, as recommended in the REF for the M4/Mamre Road east-facing ramps.
Currently, public buses and school
buses are experiencing considerable delays over the M4 bridge due to the heavy
traffic volumes accessing the right turn to travel west on the M4, and the even
larger quantities of vehicles queuing to move across the bridge and make the
left turn onto the M4 ramp to travel east.
These problems will increase with
the development of the Erskine Park Employment Area.
Great
Western Highway/Parker Street Intersection
The resolution of the existing deficiencies at this intersection will be redundant with the construction of the upgrade to accommodate the future developments in the area (ADI, Penrith Lakes and Glenmore Park Expansion). Developer Agreements will contribute to the ultimate upgrade of this intersection and, as such, it is suggested that a low priority be given for the interim solution and the ultimate solution be pursued.
Conclusion
As a result of the visit to Penrith by State Cabinet and the subsequent correspondence from the Hon Joe Tripodi, Minster for Roads, Council has been requested to provide a prioritised list for further consideration for road network upgrades. The RTA will develop cost estimates for the top three priorities and advise the Minister. The PARS has formed the basis for the development of this list.
The following projects are recommended for submission to the Minister, through the RTA. The projects provide a strategic benefit to the City as well as addressing existing problems at key locations in the City.
ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITISED
LIST
Road Infrastructure |
Priority |
Werrington Arterial Stage 1 |
1 |
Erskine
Park Arterial – Erskine Park Employment Area/M7 Link Road |
2 |
Jane
Street Extension |
3 |
Mamre Road/M4 Interchange |
4 |
Great Western Highway/Parker Street |
5 |
That: 1. The
information contained in the report on Road Infrastructure Priority List be
received 2. The road infrastructure prioritised list be forwarded to the Roads and Traffic Authority for their consideration. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
5 December
2005 |
|
The City Supported by
Infrastructure |
|
The City Supported by Infrastructure
11 |
Rural Fire
Brigades Grant Funding |
1033/4 |
Compiled by: Laurie
Cafarella, Coordinator Community Protection
Authorised by: Barry Ryan, Waste and Community
Protection Manager
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: Plans are developed and
implemented in partnership with emergency service agencies to provide emergency
services and facilities to the City.
Critical Action: Protocols for the City’s response to fire, flood and other emergency
conditions are established in partnership with the relevant agencies.
Purpose:
To inform Council
of the status of grant applications made by the Castlereagh, Londonderry and
Berkshire Park Volunteer Rural Fire Brigades to the Department of Environment
and Conservation under the Castlereagh Grants Scheme. The report recommends that Council agrees to auspice the Grant
Funds on behalf of the Rural Fire Brigades and that the Waste and Community
Protection Manager be authorised to complete the Grant Agreements nominating
Penrith Council as the administrator of the grant funds.
Background
Applications for grant funding were recently made by the Castlereagh, Londonderry and Berkshire Park Rural Fire Brigades under the Castlereagh Grants Scheme, which is administered by the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC).
Current Situation
Advice has been received from DEC that the applications have been successful. The grant details for each Brigade are as follows:
1. Castlereagh
Rural Fire Brigade
Funding in the order
of $8,819 (ex GST) has been approved by DEC for the construction of a 6.6m x
8.3m under cover area between the Brigade Station and their Training Room. The
Brigade is aware that a Development Application and Construction Certificate
are required for the under cover area.
2. Londonderry
Rural Fire Brigade
Funding in the order
of $22,693 (ex GST) has been approved by DEC for the purchase of equipment to
enhance the Brigade’s ability to protect the local community and environment
during bushfire emergencies.
3. Berkshire
Park Rural Fire Brigade
Funding in the order
of $22,273 (ex GST) has been approved by DEC to assist the Brigade in the
timely completion of the Brigade Station extensions currently under
construction. (Development Application and Construction Certificate approved.)
In total, grants of $53,785 have been
approved for the Brigade Stations.
However, as the Brigades are not incorporated bodies, Council has been
requested to administer the grant funds as an auspicing agency.
This will require Council to receive the
grant funding from DEC, authorise payment of grant funds for their intended
purpose and a certified financial report prepared by Council’s Chief Financial
Officer will need to be prepared for each of the Brigades to include in their
final project report to DEC.
The financial report must:
1. accurately
reflect income and expenditure for the project;
2. reflect that all payments were supported
by adequate documentation to show that expenditure was for bona fide goods and
services related to the project; and,
3. indicate that competitive pricing was
obtained for all individual items of expenditure of $5,000 and over.
Financial Services Manager’s Comment
Council has on a number of occasions acted as
the auspicing authority to facilitate the acceptance of grants by local
bodies. It is a reasonable request and
mechanisms exist that allow for easy tracking of the grants money and a
certified financial report to DEC can be readily provided.
Given that the Brigades are not incorporated,
the request by DEC for Council to administer the Grant Funds on the
Department’s behalf is considered reasonable.
That: 1. The
information contained in the report on Rural Fire Brigades Grant Funding be
received 2. Council agrees to auspice the
Grant Funds identified in this report 3. The Waste and Community Protection Manager be authorised to complete the Grant Agreements nominating Penrith Council as the administrator of the grant funds. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
5 December
2005 |
|
The City Supported by
Infrastructure |
|
The City Supported by Infrastructure
12 |
Penrith VRA
Rescue Squad |
1101/1 Pt 4 |
Compiled by: Barry
Ryan, Waste and Community Protection Manager
Authorised by: Barry Ryan, Waste and Community
Protection Manager
Requested By: Councillor John Thain
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: Plans are developed and
implemented in partnership with emergency service agencies to provide emergency
services and facilities to the City.
Critical Action: Protocols for the City’s response to fire, flood and other emergency
conditions are established in partnership with the relevant agencies.
Purpose:
To inform Council
of a request by Penrith VRA Rescue Squad for a short-term loan. The report recommends that the information
be received.
Background
Council has made several representations to the Minister for Emergency Services to provide direct funding assistance to the Penrith VRA Rescue Squad (VRA).
The Penrith VRA is the primary response agency for rescue tasks in the Penrith LGA as determined by the State Rescue Board. The Penrith VRA is also required to assist, at their request, NSW Police, NSW Fire Brigades, NSW Ambulance, NSW Rural Fire Service and NSW State Emergency Service, in dealing with any incident or emergency.
Penrith is the only Council in the Sydney Metropolitan Area where this is the case. The NSW Fire Brigades, Police or Ambulance Service are the primary response agencies in all other Sydney Metropolitan Council Areas.
The Penrith VRA must compete for funding against all other Volunteer Rescue Associations, including Surf Lifesaving, for the limited funds made available by the State Government. Council has already made representations to the Minister for Emergency Services, The Hon. Tony Kelly, highlighting the inequity in the amount of funding provided by the State Government to the primary rescue agency in Penrith (Penrith VRA) in comparison to other Sydney Metropolitan Council areas.
Current Situation
The Penrith VRA receives financial support from the NSW Government through the Executive of the NSW VRA.
Penrith Council provided a financial contribution of $31,000 to the Penrith VRA in 2004/2005 to assist in offsetting operational expenditure.
Penrith Council has written to the Minister for Emergency Services on numerous occasions to seek additional financial support to the Penrith VRA. Council has suggested that the operations of the Penrith VRA provide savings to NSW State Emergency Services who would otherwise be required to provide a primary rescue function in the Penrith Local Government Area.
Penrith Council provides financial support to the NSW Fire Brigades ($973,491 in 2005/2006) as a contribution to their overall budget, as do all local councils in the Sydney Fire District.
The NSW Fire Brigades provide primary rescue tasks in a significant number of Local Government Areas. Penrith Council, therefore, supports the primary rescue agency in the Local Government Areas where the NSW Fire Brigades provide the primary rescue function. The converse does not apply with other councils and State Government supporting the primary rescue agency in Penrith on an annual basis.
Whilst the Minister has not agreed to the annual funding of the Penrith VRA on this basis, it is felt that Council should pursue this line of thought to address the inequity of funding to the primary rescue agency in the Penrith Local Government Area.
At the request of Cr Greg Davies, a further meeting is being arranged between the Minister for Emergency Services, Cr Davies and senior Council officers in an attempt to address this matter.
The Penrith VRA has acknowledged Council’s position and, whilst agreeing with the direction that Council is taking to achieve long-term funding for their organisation, has advised that in the interim period their organisation has a need for direct financial support to assist in offsetting operational expenditure.
Penrith VRA representatives have advised that they have recently incurred considerable unexpected costs to repair several of their vehicles.
The Penrith VRA have requested Council consider direct financial support to the Penrith VRA by way of a $20,000 short-term loan to assist their organisation until the long-term funding issues can be resolved.
The Penrith VRA requested Council to consider a short term interest free loan of 3-5 years. The Penrith VRA advised that they will be able to repay the loan following the resolution of long term funding of the squad (with the NSW Government) and completion of the new building in Simeon Road.
Council has provided an interest free loan of $40,000 to the Penrith VRA in 1986, which was repaid in 1999.
Immediately following the State Cabinet Meeting in June 2005, the Minister for Emergency Services, The Hon Tony Kelly presented the Penrith VRA with a cheque for $10,000 to support the organisation. The Penrith VRA has confirmed that this funding has been used to fund building works on the VRA’s new Headquarters in Simeon Road, Orchard Hills.
Financial Services Manager’s Comment
Council has a number of occasions provided short-term loans to assist other local organisations. The most recent was to the Penrith Basketball Stadium to assist in making repairs to the floor. The request from the VRA appears reasonable however a duration for the loan will need to be established and a repayment schedule agreed. The level of and the equity of funding from the State Government is an issue that merits ongoing advocacy.
That the information contained in the report on Penrith VRA Rescue Squad be received. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Leadership and Organisation
Item Page
13 City
Operations Directorate Report to mid November 2005 153/2 77
14 Liquor
Licence 20/14 93
15 Hydrotherapy
Centre Operation 2986/8 95
5 December
2005 |
|
Leadership and
Organisation |
|
Leadership and Organisation
13 |
City Operations
Directorate Report to mid November 2005
|
153/2 |
Compiled by: Joanne
Robertson - AM Secretary
Authorised by: Ray Moore - Director City
Operations
Strategic Program
Term Achievement: Services and programs that
Council provides are determined based on equity, customer requirements,
community benefits and best value.
Critical Action: Deliver quality customer services, responsive to contemporary community
expectations within available resources.
Purpose:
To inform Council
on the progress of works of the City Operations Directorate. The report recommends that the information
be received.
ASSET
MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
Civil
Operations Section