6 December 2006
Dear Councillor,
In pursuance of the provisions of the Local Government
Act, 1993 and the Regulations thereunder, notice is hereby given that an ORDINARY MEETING of Penrith City
Council is to be held in the Council Chambers, Civic Centre,
Attention is directed to the statement accompanying
this notice of the business proposed to be transacted at the meeting.
Yours
Faithfully
Alan Travers
General Manager
BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
2. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Leave of absence has been
granted to:
Councillor Karen McKeown - 9 December
2006 to 18 December 2006 inclusive.
3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Ordinary Meeting - 4
December 2006.
4. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Pecuniary Interest (The Act requires Councillors who
declare a pecuniary interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion
of that item)
Non-Pecuniary Interest
5. ADDRESSING THE MEETING
6. MAYORAL MINUTES
7. NOTICES OF MOTION
8. ADOPTION OF REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEES
Local Traffic Committee
Meeting - 4 December 2006.
9. MASTER PROGRAM REPORTS
10. URGENT REPORTS (to be dealt with in the master program to which the
item relates)
11. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
12. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Monday 11 December 2006
table of contents
seating arrangements
meeting calendar
confirmation of minutes
report and recommendations of committees
master program reports
PRAYER
“Sovereign God, tonight as we gather together as a Council we affirm
that you are the giver and sustainer of life.
We come together as representatives of our community to make decisions
that will benefit this city and the people within it.
We come not in a spirit of competition, not as adversaries, but as
colleagues. Help us to treat each other
with respect, with dignity, with interest and with honesty. Help us not just to hear the words we say,
but also to hear each others hearts. We
seek to be wise in all that we say and do.
As we meet, our concern is for this city. Grant us wisdom, courage and strength.
Lord, help us. We pray this in
the name of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Amen.”
Statement of Recognition of
Aboriginal and
Cultural Heritage
Council values the unique status of
Aboriginal people as the original owners and custodians of lands and waters,
including the land and waters of
Council values the unique status of Torres
Strait Islander people as the original owners and custodians of the
We work together for a united
Council
Chambers Seating Arrangements
Managers
MEETING CALENDAR
MEETING CALENDAR
February 2007 - December
2007
|
TIME |
FEB |
MAR |
APRIL |
MAY |
JUNE |
JULY |
AUG |
SEPT |
OCT |
NOV |
DEC |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
||
Ordinary
Meetings |
7.30 pm |
12 |
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
3ü |
|
|
|
|
26 |
23 |
14v |
18* |
23 |
13 |
24^ |
29 |
19 |
10 |
||
Policy
Review Committee |
7.30 pm |
|
12@ |
2 |
|
4 |
9 |
|
10 |
|
|
3 |
19#+ |
|
30 |
21# |
|
30 |
20#+ |
|
8@ |
5# |
|
# Meetings
at which the Management Plan Ľly
reviews are presented. |
^ Election
of Mayor/Deputy Mayor [only business] |
#+ General
Manager’s presentation – half year and end of year review |
@ Strategic
Program progress reports [only business] |
v Meeting at which the Draft Management Plan
is adopted for exhibition |
ü Meeting at which the 2006/2007 Annual
Statements are presented |
* Meeting
at which the Management Plan for 2007/2008 is adopted |
|
Council’s Ordinary
Meetings are held on a three-week cycle where practicable.
-
Extraordinary Meetings are held as required.
-
Policy Review Meetings are held on a three-week cycle
where practicable.
-
Members of the public are invited to observe meetings of
the Council. All meetings start at
7:30pm.
Should you wish to
address Council, please contact the Public Officer, Glenn McCarthy on 47327649
OF
THE ORDINARY MEETING OF
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ON MONDAY 4 DECEMBER 2006 AT 7:06PM
NATIONAL ANTHEM
The meeting opened with the National Anthem.
STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, read a
statement of recognition of
PRAYER
The Council Prayer was read by the Rev Neil Checkley.
PRESENT
His Worship the Mayor Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, David Bradbury, Lexie Cettolin, Kevin Crameri OAM (arrived at 7:08 pm), Greg Davies (arrived at 7:08 pm), Mark Davies, Ross Fowler, Jackie Greenow, Karen McKeown, Susan Page, Garry Rumble, Steve Simat, and John Thain.
APOLOGIES |
There were no apologies. |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Ordinary Meeting - 20 November 2006 |
1192 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Karen McKeown that the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of 20 November 2006 be confirmed. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor Jackie Greenow declared a potential pecuniary
interest in Item 14 - Proposed
Amendment to Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1991 (Environmental Heritage
Conservation), as she is the
owner of property subject to the LEP, and announced that she would vacate the
Chamber during the debate and voting on this matter.
Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM declared a potential pecuniary interest in Item 8 - St Marys Release Area - Nomination of Former ADI Site and King
Family Farm Site and Trees on the National Heritage List, as he owns land
in the vicinity of this site. Councillor
Crameri announced that he would not vacate the Chamber and would reserve the
right to take part in the debate and voting.
Councillor John
Thain declared a pecuniary interest in Committee
of the Whole Item 3 - Commercial Matter
- Penrith Football Stadium Future Management, as his employer is a sponsor of an entity
mentioned in the report.
Councillor Thain
announced that he would vacate the Chamber during consideration of this matter
and would not take part in the debate and voting.
Councillor Steve
Simat declared a pecuniary interest in Item
8 - St Marys Release Area - Nomination of Former ADI Site and King Family Farm
Site and Trees on the National Heritage List, as his employer has provided
consulting services to the applicant, Delfin Lend Lease. Councillor Simat announced that he would
vacate the Chamber during consideration of this matter and would not take part
in the debate and voting.
Councillor Jim
Aitken OAM, declared a pecuniary interest in Item 11 - Development Application 06/1247 for the Proposed Operation of
a Community Market at Lot 2 and 3 DP 546822, Lot 101 DP 572474 Allen Place and
Edward Place Car Park, Woodriff Street, Penrith. Applicant: Cityscape Planning
+ Projects; Owner: Penrith City Council,
as he owns land adjoining this site.
Councillor Aitken announced that he would vacate the Chamber during
consideration of this matter and would not take part in the debate and voting.
Councillor Ross
Fowler declared a pecuniary interest in Item
8 - St Marys Release Area - Nomination of Former ADI Site and King Family Farm
Site and Trees on the National Heritage List, as he is either a Director of, or auditor to,
or accountant for clients who own properties in the area. Councillor Fowler announced that he would
vacate the Chamber during consideration of this matter and would not take part
in the debate and voting.
SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS |
1193 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Susan Page that Standing Orders be suspended to allow members of the public to address the meeting, the time being 7:10 pm. |
Mr Paul Crewe
Item 5 – Cemetery Matters -
Commemorative Walls - Emu Plains and
Speaking FOR the Recommendation
Mr Crewe was speaking on behalf of Ms Jennifer Hogan, who
has requested a Commemorative wall in memory of her father who was buried in
Mr Crewe spoke in support of the report’s recommendation to
erect commemorative walls at both Penrith and
Mr Darryl White and Mr Robert Turner
Item 11 - Development Application 06/1247 for
the Proposed Operation of a Community Market at Lot 2 and 3 DP 546822, Lot 101
DP 572474 Allen Place and Edward Place Car Park, Woodriff Street, Penrith.
Applicant: Cityscape Planning + Projects;
Owner: Penrith City Council
Speaking AGAINST the Recommendation
Mr White and Mr Turner represented the
Mr Bob Meyer
Item 17 - Employment
Planning Discussion Paper and draft Employment Planning Strategy
Speaking FOR
the Recommendation
(in relation to the former CSIRO
site at Badgery’s Creek)
Mr Meyer spoke as a consultant to the proponent in this
matter, supporting the use of this land for ‘employment land’ and
Mr Bob Meyer
Item 17 - Employment
Planning Discussion Paper and draft Employment Planning Strategy
Speaking AGAINST the Recommendation
(in relation to the Capitol Hill
site, Kemps Creek)
Mr Meyer spoke as a consultant to the proponent, Pazit Pty Limited and noted that this company has development consent for 110 one-hectare rural residential lots on the site at Kemps Creek.
Mr Meyer objected to the Department of Planning’s view that the proposal did not meet the access criterion, describing it as being ‘out of centre’.
Mr Meyer also requested that Council support a submission to the Department of Planning to include the 160 ha at Capitol Hill in its current infrastructure servicing exercise, to help distribute costs of servicing to the whole area.
The Hon Ron Mulock AO
Item 17 - Employment
Planning Discussion Paper and draft Employment Planning Strategy
Speaking AGAINST the Recommendation
(in relation to the Capitol Hill
site, Kemps Creek)
Mr Mulock spoke as a representative of the project team at Pazit Pty Limited.
Mr Mulock stressed the need for executive housing in the Capitol Hill area, and sought Council’s support for a golf course estate on the site currently approved for 110 one-hectare rural residential lots.
Mr Mulock stated that the matter is now in the hands of the
Department of Planning, but he did not agree with their view that the estate
would be ‘out of centre’ or that it ‘would prematurely push the
Mr Mulock requested that a full briefing be given to Councillors on this matter, giving other applicants the opportunity to express their views, and stating that Council should not rush into adopting this strategy, but should instead give his client the opportunity to brief Council on this matter.
Mr Mark Tooker
Item 17 - Employment
Planning Discussion Paper and draft Employment Planning Strategy
Speaking AGAINST the Recommendation
Mr Tooker spoke as a Principal of the consulting engineering
firm, Patterson Britten & Partners, on behalf of owners of Nos
Mr Tooker requested that this site be included within the
Mr Vittorino Robino
Item 23 - Clothing Collection Bins
Speaking AGAINST the Recommendation
Mr Robino spoke on behalf of The Smith Family, in objection to Council’s decision to remove all clothing collection bins from Council land.
Mr Robino noted that, as well as clothing, a lot of waste was removed from the bins, by The Smith Family, which would otherwise need to be removed by Council from various public areas, and also advised that the removal of all Smith Family clothing bins would result in loss of employment for staff involved in the collection of clothing from bins in the Penrith area.
Mr Robino requested Council to reconsider its decision, and advised that The Smith Family would remove any problem bins from the Penrith area.
Mr Frank Gorrel
Item 23 - Clothing Collection Bins
Speaking AGAINST the Recommendation
Mr Gorrel spoke on behalf of the Aboriginal Children’s Advancement Society (ACAS), of which he is General Secretary.
Mr Gorrel thanked Council for only allowing registered charities to locate bins in the Penrith area.
Mr Gorrel stated that, if the clothing bins operated by the ACAS were to be removed, the Society would suffer a severe loss of income which would affect its operations.
Mr Gorrel asked that Council amend its recommendation to allow the Aboriginal Children’s Advancement Society to continue their work in the Penrith area.
RESUMPTION OF STANDING ORDERS |
1194 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Susan Page that Standing Orders be resumed, the time being 7:45 pm. |
MAYORAL MINUTES
1 Penrith Attraction Wins NSW Tourism
Award
Councillor Mark Davies left the meeting, the time being 7:46 pm.
1195
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Pat Sheehy AM seconded Councillor
Karen McKeown
That:
1. The Mayoral Minute on Penrith Attraction Wins NSW Tourism Award be received.
2. A letter be forwarded to Muru Mittigar congratulating them on their success.
Councillor Mark Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 7:47 pm.
2 Gift Received from Xicheng District,
1196
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Pat Sheehy AM seconded Councillor
Garry Rumble
That:
1. The
Mayoral Minute on the visit by Nepean Riverlands Probus Club to Xicheng
District of Beijing be received.
2. The
gift from Governor Lin Duo of Xicheng District be received and put on display.
3 Council Receives
1197
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Pat Sheehy AM seconded Councillor
Jim Aitken OAM
That:
1. The Mayoral Minute on Council Receives National Recognition for Sustainability be received.
2. All staff involved in the Water Campaign and Greenhouse Purchasing programs be congratulated on their achievements.
4 National Awards for Local Government
1198
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Pat Sheehy AM seconded Councillor
Jim Aitken OAM
That:
1. The Mayoral Minute on National Awards for Local Government be received.
2. All staff involved in the commended projects be congratulated on their success.
MASTER PROGRAM REPORTS
The City in its
Broader Context
1 State Plan
|
1199 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg
Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown That: 1. The information contained in the report
on State Plan be received. 2. Council welcome the State Plan and convey its support to local Members and the Premier. 3. Correspondence
be sent to the Minister for Transport expressing concern at the omission of
the proposed UWS/TAFE railway station at Werrington in the Urban Transport
Statement and seek from the Minister a detailed description of the proposed
transport infrastructure items in the Penrith LGA, the proposed timeframe for
their delivery and the opportunity for discussion of the project details. |
2 Alterations & Additions to St
Marys CWA Building, |
1200 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg
Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Alterations & Additions
to St Marys CWA Building, 2. Council accept
the tender of Bilas Knight Pty Ltd in the amount of $193,807.90 for
alterations and additions to the 3. The Building Services Manager be authorised to execute any necessary documentation. 4. Council
officers be authorised to negotiate the changes in the design of the entry
canopy. |
3 Update on the |
1201 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown that
the information contained in the report on Update on the Penrith City Centre Plan Launch and Exhibition be received. |
The
4 Community Assistance Program - Planned
Component 2006 |
1202 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Susan Page That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Community Assistance
Program - Planned Component 2006 /07 be received. 2. Council endorse funding the recommended projects totalling $19,019.55 from the Planned Component of the Community Assistance Program. 3. $19.55 be re-allocated from the Rolling Component of the Community Assistance Program to the Planned Component to cover the shortfall between the total value of recommended projects detailed in this report and the $19,000 currently allocated to the Planned Component. |
6 Tender number 12-06/07 Public Domain
Cleaning Service
|
1203 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Susan Page That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Tender number 12-06/07
Public Domain Cleaning Service be received. 2. Council accept the tender from ACS Cleaning and Security Services Pty Ltd and a contract be awarded to them for Penrith and St Marys CBD Cleaning services for an initial period of 12 months with an option to extend the arrangements for a further 12 months subject to satisfactory performance. 3. The Cleaning
of St Marys and Penrith Bus/Rail interchanges (provisional items) are also
awarded to ACS Cleaning and Security Services Pty Ltd subject to satisfactory
agreement being reached with Railcorp regarding their contribution towards
cost. |
7 The Community Partnership Program of
the NSW Cancer Council
|
1204 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Susan Page That: 1. The information contained in the report
on The Community Partnership
Program of the NSW Cancer Council be received. 2. Penrith City Council join the Community Partnership Program of the NSW Cancer Council and affirm its commitment to reduce the impact of cancer in the local community by participating in the events and program detailed in this report. 3. The Environmental Health Manager and the Community Development Manager be nominated as the dedicated Relationship Managers for this community partnership. |
10 Update of activities undertaken by the
Development Services Department - First Quarter 2006/2007
|
1205 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Susan Page
that the information contained
in the report on Update of
activities undertaken by the Development Services Department - First Quarter
2006/2007 be received. |
5 Cemetery Matters - Commemorative Walls
- Emu Plains and |
1206 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor David
Bradbury seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Cemetery Matters -
Commemorative Walls - Emu Plains and 2. Memorial walls be erected at Emu Plains
and St Marys Cemeteries to recognise persons buried in unmarked graves within
those two cemeteries and that these walls be funded from the Cemetery
Reserve. 3. Pre-purchase of burial sites at 4. All new burial
sections at 5. Councillors be
provided with a memo, advising of the feasibility of ensuring that other
people, having relatives buried as paupers in these cemeteries, are notified
of the proposal to erect the commemorative walls. |
Having previously declared a pecuniary interest in Item 8, Councillors
Ross Fowler and Steve Simat left the meeting, the time being 8:04 pm.
8 St Marys Release Area - Nomination of
Former ADI Site and King Family Farm Site and Trees on the National Heritage
List
|
1207 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Garry Rumble That: 1. The information contained in the report
on St Marys Release Area -
Nomination of Former ADI Site and King Family Farm Site and Trees on the
National Heritage List be received. 2. Council advise the Australian Heritage Council in terms of the history
of the planning decisions taken for the St Marys Release and the observations
outlined in the commentary in the report.
|
Councillors Ross
Fowler and Steve Simat returned to the meeting, the time being 8:03 pm.
9 Public Exhibition of draft Amendment
to Penrith Development Control Plan 2006 (Section 6.3 |
1208 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Lexie Cettolin That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Public Exhibition of draft
Amendment to Penrith Development Control Plan 2006 (Section 6.3 Claremont
Meadows Stage 2) be received. 2. Council adopt the draft amendment to Claremont Meadows Stage 2 as attached to this report, pursuant to the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and Regulations as amended. 3. The amended Claremont Meadows Stage 2 DCP be included in the Penrith DCP 2006, adopted by Council on 21 August 2006, when it comes into force. 4. All those who made submissions on the draft plan be notified of Council’s decision. 5. A further
report be presented to Council, explaining DCP provisions for bushfire hazard
reduction in conservation zones adjoining residential land. |
Having previously declared a pecuniary interest in Item 11, Councillor
Jim Aitken OAM left the meeting, the time being 8:20 pm.
11 Development Application 06/1247 for the
Proposed Operation of a Community Market at Lot 2 and 3 DP 546822, Lot 101 DP
572474 Allen Place and Edward Place Car Park, Woodriff Street, Penrith.
Applicant: Cityscape Planning + Projects;
Owner: |
1209 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler that consideration of this matter
be deferred for a |
Councillor Jim
Aitken OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 8:36 pm.
12 Development Application 06/1251 for
Community Markets at Lot 8 DP 23593, Part Lot C DP 38743, |
1210 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie
Greenow seconded Councillor McKeown that consideration of this matter be
deferred for a |
Councillor John Thain left the meeting, the time being 8:48 pm.
27 Development Application 06/1287 for
proposed Government Office Building at |
1211 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Karen
McKeown seconded Councillor Susan Page That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Development Application
06/1287 for proposed 2. Development Application 06/1287 be granted consent subject to agreed conditions, in accordance with Section 116C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as shown attached, and with the addition of the following condition: The applicant
shall provide to |
Councillor John
Thain returned to the meeting, the time being 8:51 pm.
The City In Its
Environment
13 Grass Roots Sustainability -
International Lessons, Urban Solutions for Local Government Conference
|
1212 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Grass Roots Sustainability
- International Lessons, Urban Solutions for Local Government Conference be
received. 2. Council write to both CLAIR and Townsville City Council congratulating them on an outstanding Conference. 3. Council invite
CLAIR to consider holding a future Conference in Penrith. |
Councillor Jackie Greenow left the meeting, the time being 8:58 pm.
14 Proposed Amendment to Penrith Local
Environmental Plan 1991 (Environmental Heritage Conservation)
|
1213 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Karen
McKeown seconded Councillor Kaylene Allison That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Proposed Amendment to
Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1991 (Environmental Heritage Conservation)
be received 2. Pursuant to Section 54 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and Regulation, Council prepare and exhibit an amendment to the Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1991 (Environmental Heritage Conservation). 3. Council seek a ‘Written Authorisation to Exercise Delegation’ from the Director-General of the Department of Planning to exhibit the draft amendment pursuant to Section 65 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Regulation. 4. Council resolve to exhibit the draft Local Environmental
Plan in accordance with the Department of Planning document entitled “LEPs
and 5. Council resolve to amend the Exempt and Complying provisions of the Penrith Development Control Plan to require development approval for the demolition of places identified for listing as heritage items or as part of heritage conservation areas in a draft planning instrument. |
Councillor Jackie
Greenow returned to the meeting, the time being 9:00 pm.
15 Update on the implementation of the
Wallacia and Mulgoa Sewerage Scheme
|
1214 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross
Fowler seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on
Update on the implementation of the Wallacia and Mulgoa Sewerage Scheme be
received. 2.
A
further report be submitted to the next Council meeting, regarding the
provision of financial assistance by Council to owners of properties affected
by the ‘1 in 100 year’ flood level, to offset the additional cost of
connection to the Scheme. |
16 Western |
1215 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie
Greenow seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM That: 1. The
information contained in the report on Western Sydney Recycled Water Initiative - Replacement Flows Project be
received. 2. The
proposed submission outlined in the report be submitted to the Department of
Planning. |
The City as an
Economy
Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM left the meeting, the time being 9:21 pm.
18 International Links Program 2007
|
1216 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim
Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler That: 1. The information contained in the report
on International Links Program
2007 be received. 2. There be Councillor representation, along with staff of Council, nominated by the General Manager, to represent Council at the official launch of the exhibition and musical performance in Hakusan, Japan in March 2007, and that a courtesy visit also be paid to Fujieda, Japan, Penrith’s sister city and Gangseo-gu, South Korea. 3. There
be Councillor representation, accompanied by appropriate staff of Council,
nominated by the General Manager, to represent Council at the Trade and
Investment Promotion Fair in Kunshan, People’s Republic of |
19 Sponsorship of Australian Pro Tour of
Wakeboarding in |
1217 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim
Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Sponsorship of Australian
Pro Tour of Wakeboarding in 2. Council approve the sponsorship of the
Australian Pro Tour of Wakeboarding in |
21 Construction of a |
1218 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim
Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Construction of a 2. Gledhill
Constructions Pty Ltd be accepted as the preferred tenderer subject to final
costs being determined with respect to keeping 3. Council officers be authorised to enter into contractual documentation with Gledhill Constructions Pty Ltd to the satisfaction of the Legal Officer and Building Services Manager consistent with the terms of this report and subject to resolution of the matters raised in item 2 above. 4. The programme
budget as set out in the report be adopted. |
22 Council Property - Proposed subdivision
corner of Belmore and Station Streets Penrith
|
1219 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim
Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Council Property - Proposed
subdivision corner of Belmore and Station Streets Penrith be received. 2. Council enter into a Bond Agreement with Sydney Water concerning the
three (3) sewerage connection points required to the subdivision of Council’s
former Council Chambers site. 3. Council agree to the unconditional Bank Guarantee being issued to Sydney Water in the amount of $160,500 that forms part of the Bond Agreement. 4. The Common
Seal of the Council of the City of |
17 Employment Planning Discussion Paper and
draft Employment Planning Strategy |
1220 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg
Davies seconded Councillor John Thain That: 1. The information contained in the report
on the Employment Planning
Discussion Paper and draft Employment Planning Strategy be received. 2. Those persons who made submissions regarding the Employment Planning Discussion Paper and draft Employment Planning Strategy be invited to a briefing, to be held at the earliest opportunity, in the New Year. |
Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 9:27 pm.
20 Urban Development Institute of |
1221 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John
Thain seconded Councillor Kaylene Allison That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Urban Development Institute
of Australia National Congress 2007 be received. 2. Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Steve Simat,
Mark Davies, Lexie Cettolin, Jackie Greenow, |
The City Supported
by Infrastructure
23 Clothing Collection Bins
|
1222 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg
Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Clothing Collection Bins be
received. 2. The owners of clothing bins in the
Penrith area be directed to remove those bins with the highest recorded
levels of dumping and vandalism, and continue to monitor the remaining bins. |
Leadership and
Organisation
24 Preparations and Financial Settings for
the 2007-08 Management Plan
|
1223 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross
Fowler seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Preparations and Financial
Settings for the 2007-08 Management Plan be received. 2. Council make initial identification of particular matters to be considered in the preparation of the Draft 2007-08 Management Plan. 3. Preparation of
the Draft 2007-08 Management Plan continue in the terms discussed in this
report. |
26 Strategic Plan Sustainability Framework |
1224 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross
Fowler seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report
on the Strategic Plan
Sustainability Framework be received. 2. The trial of the proposed sustainability framework, leading to the
development of the new Strategic Plan, be endorsed. 3. Further information on the proposed implementation of the trial be
brought to Council in the development of the next Management Plan. |
25 Biodiversity Conservation Management
Plan - |
1225 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin
Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Biodiversity Conservation
Management Plan - Erskine Park Employment Area be received. 2. Council endorse the principle of an EPEA Biodiversity Corridor System
as the centrepiece of a regional biodiversity corridor linking the Orchard
Hills Defence site, the South Creek riparian corridor, the EPEA biodiversity
corridor and the Ropes Creek riparian corridor, as outlined in the report. 3. Council endorse the Memorandum of Understanding relating to the biodiversity conservation proposal for Erskine Park Employment Area. 4. Council agree
to the covenant being placed on the title of Lot 201 DP 1094523 Erskine Park
Road, 5. The Common
Seal of the Council of the City of |
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
QWN 1 Nordoff-Robbins Music
Therapy |
Councillor Jackie Greenow requested that a
total of $10,000, equally from North, South and East Ward voted works be
allocated to gold sponsorship of Nordoff-Robbins Music Therapy |
1226 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Susan Page that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as a matter of urgency.
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
1227 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie
Greenow seconded Councillor Susan Page that a total of $10,000, equally from
North, South and East Ward voted works be allocated to gold sponsorship of
Nordoff-Robbins Music Therapy
QWN 2 Kingsway Touch
Football Complex |
Councillor Lexie Cettolin requested that
$1,300 each from North, South and East Ward voted works (total $3,900) be
allocated to carry out widening works at the driveway of Kingsway Touch
Football Complex. |
1228 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Lexie Cettolin seconded Councillor Susan Page that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as a matter of urgency.
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
1229 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Lexie
Cettolin seconded Councillor Susan Page that $1,300 each from North, South and
East Ward voted works (total $3,900) be allocated to carry out widening works
at the driveway of Kingsway Touch Football Complex.
Councillor John Thain left the meeting, the time being 9:33 pm.
QWN 3 Petition from |
Councillor Garry Rumble requested that the
development application concerning the proposed caravan park in this area (DA
06/1733) be reported to Council for its consideration, having particular
regard to matters such as noise impact, increase in traffic, security risks,
effect on property values, and location of the caravan park. |
QWN 4 Mosquito Collection
Program |
Councillor Garry Rumble requested a report
to Council concerning the possible continuation of the mosquito collection
program for the period November to May. |
QWN 5 DA Tracking Program -
"i Determine" |
Councillor Garry Rumble requested
information on the present position with regard to the operations and
redevelopment of the DA tracking program – “i Determine”, as at present this
program is not available. |
Councillor Greg Davies left the meeting, the time being 9:35 pm.
QWN 6 Spotted Gums - |
Councillor Mark Davies requested the
removal of a Spotted Gum tree, from Council land in the vicinity of |
Councillor Lexie Cettolin left the meeting, the time being 9:36 pm.
Councillor Lexie Cettolin returned to the meeting, the time being 9:37 pm.
Councillor Steve Simat left the meeting, the time being 9:39 pm.
QWN 7 |
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM presented Council
with a plaque for Gold Sponsorship of the Western Sydney Industry Awards. |
Councillor Greg Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 9:40 pm.
QWN 8 Proposed Waste Facility – |
Councillor Karen McKeown requested a report
to Council on the development application for a waste facility in |
QWN 9 Leave of Absence |
Councillor Karen McKeown requested leave of
absence from 9 December 2006 to 18 December 2006 inclusive. |
1230 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as a matter of urgency.
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, ruled that the
matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
1231 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie
Greenow seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that Leave of Absence be granted to
Councillor Karen McKeown from 9 December 2006 to 18 December 2006 inclusive.
Having previously declared a pecuniary interest in Committee of the Whole Item 3, Councillor John Thain left the meeting, the time being 9:41 pm.
Councillor Steve Simat returned to the meeting, the time being 9:41 pm.
Committee
of the Whole
1232 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Greg Davies that the meeting adjourn to the Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters, the time being 9:42 pm.
1 Presence of the Public
CW1 RESOLVED on the motion of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Greg Davies that the press and public be excluded from Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters:
City as a
2 Legal Matter - Status of Appeal against
deemed refusal of Development Application 06/0662 for the Construction of New
Shopping Centre at Part Lot 671 DP 739138 & Lot 672 DP 739138 & Part
Lot 671 DP 739138 (No. 37) Cook Parade, St Clair. Applicant: Sam Management Service
(Aust) Pty Limited; Owner: Sam
Management Service (Aust) Pty Limited DA06/0662
This item has been referred to Committee of
the Whole as the report refers to advice concerning litigation, or advice that
would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the
ground of legal professional privilege and discussion of the matter in open
meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
3 Commercial Matter - Penrith Football
Stadium Future Management
This
item is being referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to
commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the
commercial position of a person who supplied it, or (ii) confer a commercial
advantage on a competitor of the Council and discussion of the matter in open
meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
City
as an Economy
4 Commercial Matter - Council Property -
This item has been referred to Committee of
the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer
a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or
proposes to conduct) business and discussion of the matter in open meeting
would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Leadership
and Organisation
5 Commercial Matter - Acquisition of Road
Widening,
This item has been referred to Committee of
the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer
a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or
proposes to conduct) business and discussion of the matter in open meeting
would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Leadership
and Organisation
6 Commercial Matter - Council Property -
Lease of ATM Space within
This item has been referred to Committee of
the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer
a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or
proposes to conduct) business and discussion of the matter in open meeting
would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Leadership
and Organisation
7 Commercial Matter - Council Property -
This item has been referred to Committee of
the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer
a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or
proposes to conduct) business and discussion of the matter in open meeting
would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
The
meeting resumed at 10:15 pm and the General Manager reported that the Committee
of the Whole met at 9:42 pm on 4 December 2006, the following being present
His Worship the Mayor Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, David Bradbury, Lexie Cettolin, Kevin Crameri OAM, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Ross Fowler, Jackie Greenow, Karen McKeown, Susan Page, Garry Rumble, Steve Simat, and John Thain (from 10:08 pm).
and
the Committee of the Whole excluded the press and public from the meeting for
the reasons set out in CW1 and that the Committee of the Whole submitted the
following recommendations to Council.
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
2 Legal Matter - Status of Appeal against deemed refusal of Development Application 06/0662 for the Construction of New Shopping Centre at Part Lot 671 DP 739138 & Lot 672 DP 739138 & Part Lot 671 DP 739138 (No. 37) Cook Parade, St Clair. Applicant: Sam Management Service (Aust) Pty Limited; Owner: Sam Management Service (Aust) Pty Limited DA06/0662 |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor
Greg Davies seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow CW2 That the information contained in the report on Legal Matter - Status of Appeal against
deemed refusal of Development Application 06/0662 for the Construction of New
Shopping Centre at Part Lot 671 DP 739138 & Lot 672 DP 739138 & Part
Lot 671 DP 739138 (No. 37) Cook Parade, St Clair be received. |
3 Commercial Matter - Penrith Football Stadium Future Management |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of CW3 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Commercial Matter - Penrith
Football Stadium Future Management be received. 2. Council endorse the program of activities outlined in the report. 3. Subject to confirmation of the actual costs, an amount of $70,000 be provided to Panthers as Council’s contribution to the redevelopment project to meet funding shortfall in the project, and those funds be drawn from the relevant Reserve to meet the costs of the new electronic evacuation systems in the redeveloped Penrith Football Stadium. |
Councillor John Thain returned to the meeting, the time being 10:08 pm.
4 Commercial Matter - Council Property -
|
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor
Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler CW4 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Commercial Matter - Council
Property - 2. A further report be presented to Council on the progress of the development. 3. The Common Seal of the Council of the
City of |
5 Commercial Matter - Acquisition of Road
Widening, |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor
Greg Davies seconded Councillor Kaylene Allison CW5 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Commercial Matter -
Acquisition of Road Widening, 2. Council compensate the owners for the dedication of the land in accordance with conditions 1 to 4, as outlined in the summary of the report. |
6 Commercial Matter - Council Property -
Lease of ATM Space within |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor
Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler CW6 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Commercial Matter - Council
Property - Lease of ATM Space within Queen Street Centre at 2. Council grant a new 3-year Lease with a 3-year option to the existing tenant in accordance with the terms and conditions as outlined in the report. 3. The Common
Seal of the Council of the City of |
7 Commercial Matter - Council Property -
|
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor
Ross Fowler seconded Councillor Greg Davies CW7 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Commercial Matter - Council
Property - Sale of No 8 Coallee Place 2. Council adopt
the reserve price for the sale of Lot 24, DP 249672 at No 8 Coallee Place 3. Council issue Delegated Authority to the Property Development Manager indicated at Item 2 in the separate annexure report issued to Council. 4. The Property
Development Manager be authorised to sign the Contract for |
ADOPTION
OF Committee of the Whole
1233 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Susan Page that the recommendations contained in the Committee of the Whole, and shown as CW1, CW2, CW3, CW4, CW5, CW6 and CW7, be adopted.
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 10:18 pm.
PENRITH
CITY COUNCIL
Procedure
for Addressing Meetings
Anyone can request permission to address a meeting,
providing that the number of speakers is limited to three in support of any
proposal and three against.
Any request about an issue or matter on the Agenda for
the meeting can be lodged with the General Manager or Public Officer up until
12 noon on the day of the meeting.
Prior to the meeting the person who has requested
permission to address the meeting will need to provide the Public Officer with
a written statement of the points to be covered during the address in
sufficient detail so as to inform the Councillors of the substance of the
address and a written copy of any questions to be asked of the Council in order
that responses to those questions can be provided in due course.
In addition, prior to addressing the meeting a person
addressing Council or Committee will be informed that they do not enjoy any
privilege and that permission to speak may be withdrawn should they make
inappropriate comments.
It should be noted that speakers at meetings of the
Council or Committee do not have absolute privilege (parliamentary
privilege). A speaker who makes any
potentially offensive or defamatory remarks about any other person may render
themselves open to legal action.
Prior to addressing the meeting the person will be
required to sign the following statement:
“I (name) understand that the meeting I intend
to address on (date) is a public meeting.
I also understand that should I say or present any material that is
inappropriate, I may be subject to legal action. I also acknowledge that I have been informed
to obtain my own legal advice about the appropriateness of the material that I
intend to present at the above mentioned meeting”.
Should a person fail to sign the above statement then
permission to address either the Council or Committee will not be granted.
The Public Officer or Minute Clerk will speak to those
people who have requested permission to address the meeting, prior to the
meeting at 6.45pm.
It is up to the Council or Committee to decide if the
request to address the meeting will be granted.
Where permission is to be granted the Council or
Committee, at the appropriate time, will suspend only so much of the Standing
Orders to allow the address to occur.
The Chairperson will then call the person up to the
lectern or speaking area.
The person addressing the meeting needs to clearly
indicate:
·
Their name;
·
Organisation or group they are representing (if applicable);
·
Details of the issue to be addressed and the item number of the
report in the Business Paper;
·
Whether they are opposing or supporting the issue or matter (if
applicable) and the action they would like the meeting to take;
·
The interest of the speaker
(e.g. affected person, neighbour, applicant, applicants
spokesperson, interested citizen etc).
Each person then has five minutes to make their
address. Those addressing Council will
be required to speak to the written statement they have submitted. Permission to address Council is not to be
taken as an opportunity to refute or otherwise the points made by previous
speakers on the same issue.
The Council or Committee can extend this time if they
consider if appropriate, however, everyone needs to work on the basis that the
address will be for five minutes only.
Councillors may have questions about the address so
people are asked to remain at the lectern or in the speaking area until the
Chairperson has thanked them.
When this occurs, they should then return to their
seat.
Glenn McCarthy
Public
Officer
02 4732 7649
11
December 2006 |
|
The City as a Social Place |
|
Mayoral Minute
Strategic Program Term Achievement: The
City is widely recognised as a centre of cultural diversity, excellence and
access.
Penrith was recently the venue for the Metropolitan
Public Libraries Association’s 2006 conference. It was a dual honour as during
the conference our own library was recognised for one of its exceptional
initiatives to encourage parents and children to use the Library.
Penrith City
Library was Highly Commended in the 2006 Marketing Awards for Public
Libraries in the 100,000 + population
section for its Harry Potter Extravaganza Party. The event was held in
conjunction with the launch of Harry Potter & the Half- Blood Prince
by J. K. Rowling in July 2005.
The Harry
Potter Extravaganza Party saw Library staff volunteering their time to convert
part of the library into a miniature version of the Great Hall, which was
extensively decorated for the occasion. Two competitions were held in the lead
up to the event and 100 winners were ‘enrolled’ at Hogwart’s Academy for an
evening of feasting and training in the finer arts of magic under the eagle eye
of Professor Goode and other Hogwart’s faculty members (library staff dressed
in costume). The evening was launched by the then Mayor, Councillor Jackie
Greenow.
As a result of the event and the increased awareness of the library's junior
collections, statistics for the month of July
2005 peaked at almost 18,000 - the highest monthly junior fiction loan
statistics on record. This
growth trend has continued with total junior loans reaching 149,490 in
2004/2005 and 181,691 in 2005/2006, an increase of 32,201 or 21.54%.
The Harry Potter Extravaganza raised the profile of Penrith City Library
within the community, reinforcing the relevance of libraries as a fun,
recreational and social place. The
support from library staff, council departments, local businesses and media
outlets, ensured the success of the event. Most importantly of all, it has had
a significant and lasting impact on junior loan statistics, which continue to
grow beyond all expectations.
The culmination of the Harry Potter
Extravaganza is an excellent example of team building and motivation of staff,
the appreciation of the local community and the sustained interaction between
the community, local organisations and Penrith City Library.
Pat Sheehy AM
Mayor
That: 1. The Mayoral Minute on Penrith City Library recognised in Marketing Awards be received. 2. All staff involved in the Harry Potter Extravaganza Party be congratulated on their success in the 2006 Marketing Awards for Public Libraries. |
Reports of
Committees
Item Page
1 Report
and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 4 December,
2006
11
December 2006 |
|
Leadership and Organisation |
|
REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
Local
Traffic Committee MEETING
HELD ON 4
December, 2006
PRESENT
Michael Alderton – Road Network Services Engineer (Chairperson), Mayor Councillor Sheehy – Representative for the Member for Londonderry (part-time), Deputy Mayor Councillor McKeown – Representative for the Member for Mulgoa, Sergeant Scott Smith – Penrith Police, Senior Constable Mark Elliott – St Marys/Regentville Police, Richard McHenery – Roads and Traffic Authority
IN ATTENDANCE
Michael Pruss – Westbus, Stephen Barnes – Senior Traffic Engineer, Sharon Maddox – Road Safety Co-ordinator, David Drozd – Consulting Traffic Engineer, Noel Fuller – Co-ordinator, Ranger Services, Mary Jaser – Trainee Engineer
APOLOGIES |
LTC 150 Councillor Greenow, Tim Horan – Representative for the Member for Penrith, David Burns – Asset Manager |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Local Traffic Committee Meeting – 6 November 2006 |
LTC 151 That the minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting of 6 November 2006 be confirmed. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no declarations of interest.
MASTER PROGRAM REPORTS
The City Supported
by Infrastructure
1 Local Traffic Committee - Meeting
Dates for 2007
|
RECOMMENDATION LTC 152 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Local Traffic Committee -
Meeting Dates for 2007 be received. 2. The above dates be confirmed for 2007. |
2 |
RECOMMENDATION LTC 153 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on 2. The design plans for a slow-point device
(tadpole island) to be located between Werrington Creek and Malcolm Avenue
and a Watts Profile speed hump, installed on both sides of the road (full
width) at a distance of approximately 5.15m to the west of house number 63
John Oxley Avenue be finalised and endorsed for construction. 3. Additional advance warning “Slow Point”
signs to be provided beyond the crest near Werrington Creek. |
|
RECOMMENDATION LTC 154 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on 2. The design plan for the provision of a
Wombat Crossing plan number AB161 be finalised and endorsed for construction. |
4 Ripples Leisure Centre, St Marys -
Request for Provision of Staff Permit Parking
|
RECOMMENDATION LTC 155 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Ripples Leisure Centre, St
Marys - Request for Provision of Staff Permit Parking be received 2. All existing
3-Hour time restricted parking spaces in the Ripples Carpark on the western
side of 3. The General Manager of Ripples be responsible for the administration of 20 authorised parking permits for the full-time staff members of Ripples Leisure Centre. 4. Council’s
Co-ordinator, Ranger Services liaise with the General Manager of Ripples to
determine an appropriate design for the 20 authorised parking permits. |
5 |
LTC Comment The
Penrith Police representative raised concerns regarding parking on § reductions in available sight distance when exiting driveways and at intersections § accessibility for all heavy vehicles including B-Doubles would be reduced § opportunities for passing turning vehicles would be reduced § increased risk of heavy vehicle collisions due to reduction in travelling/manoeuvring space § increased pedestrian activity from on-street parking. RECOMMENDATION LTC 156 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on 2. Council’s
Compliance Officers be requested to enforce the Conditions of Consent
regarding on-site staff parking and vehicle service parking, and the
implementation of timed No Parking signage on 3. Investigation
be undertaken to provide staggered 1-Hour Parking (8:30am-6:00pm Mon-Fri
& 8:30am-12:30pm Sat) restrictions on the northern and southern sides of 4. Councillor
Greg Davies be advised. |
|
RECOMMENDATION LTC 157 That: 1. The information contained in the report
on 2. The provision of additional traffic and pedestrian facilities in 3. Councillor Lexie Cettolin and the
resident be advised of the decision of the Committee. |
GENERAL BUSINESS
GB |
Council previously received concerns from
Councillor Cettolin regarding speeding vehicles in Three reports have been presented to the
Local Traffic Committee in response to these concerns, ie, 6 December 2004, 6
June 2005, and 3 April 2006. At its
meeting on 1 May 2006, Council resolved, on the recommendation of the Committee
that: 1. The information contained in the report “ 2. Councils’ Design Co-ordinator be requested
to review the proposed traffic calming devices and a further report be
submitted to the Committee for consideration. 3. The 4. The problem of speeding vehicles in A traffic speed
and volume classification was carried out mid-way along Grays Lane outside
house number 47 in late October 2004, confirming that approximately 1,200
vehicles use Grays Lane on a daily basis, travelling at an 85th
percentile speed of 65kph in the existing 50kph zone. Further speed
and volume classifications were carried out in May 2005 at the three sites
proposed for “Watts Profile Humps”, as follows: · Site 1 – Between
house numbers 1 and · Site 2 – Between
house numbers 46-54 and 56-60. · Approximately 1,100 vehicles per day,
travelling at an 85th percentile speed of 66kph. · Site 3- Between house numbers 28-30 and 32-34, north of the existing
40kph School Zone yellow patch and south of · Approximately 1,000 vehicles per day,
travelling at an 85th percentile speed of 64kph. The options of
providing tadpole islands or modified speed humps that will allow fire trucks
to straddle the hump in Consultation In accordance with
Recommendation 3 from the Local Traffic Committee Meeting on 6 June 2005, a
letter was sent to the NSW Fire Brigades advising them of the proposal to
construct three “Watts Profile” speed humps in A response was
received from the NSW Fire Brigades Superintendent, not supporting the
installation of additional traffic calming devices in The NSW Fire
Brigades’ primary concern is that lives may be lost by delayed arrival times
at incidents by emergency services.
The NSW Fire Brigades stated that “speed cushions situated in A separate
consultation process is currently under way between Council and NSW Fire Brigades
with regard to the reconstruction of the median island at the intersection of
The Northern Road and Enforcement In accordance with
Recommendation 4 from the Local Traffic Committee Meeting on 3 April 2006, a
letter was sent to Penrith Police requesting enforcement on Conclusion Site investigations recognise that there is a speeding
issue in To date, consultation with NSW Fire Brigades has been
through written correspondence. It
would be beneficial to meet NSW Fire Brigades representatives on site to
discuss issues and determine if there is a solution that will reduce traffic
speeds in RECOMMENDATION LTC 158 That: 1. The Committee note the information. 2. Councillor Cettolin be advised of the status of the
investigations. |
|
Council’s Road Network Services Engineer advised the
Committee that confirmation has been received from the Roads and Traffic
Authority that funding for the amended proposal involving the installation of
kerb blister islands and improved signposting at RECOMMENDATION LTC 159 That the Committee note the information. |
GB 3 Child
Care Centres, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Council has received a request from Councillor Garry
Rumble on behalf of the Glenmore Park Action Group to investigate the
feasibility of providing traffic calming devices fronting all child care
centres in There are
currently eight child care centres of various sizes operating on various
roads throughout the
It is evident from
the above table that the basic traffic related parameters nominated above
would appear to be within acceptable limits.
This is generally the case with the majority of roads within the
Glenmore Park area, as one of the primary design philosophies during the
initial planning of the estate was to reduce the potential for accidents to
occur by encouraging lower vehicle speeds through the implementation of sound
traffic engineering principles at the outset rather than relying on retro
fitting traffic calming devices at a later date. It would appear
that based on the above data, the provision of any new or additional traffic
calming devices in the vicinity of the existing child care centres within
Glenmore Park would be difficult to justify and accordingly is not warranted. RECOMMENDATION LTC 160 That: 1. The provision of any new or
additional traffic calming devices in the vicinity of the existing childcare
centres within 2. Councillor Rumble and Glenmore Park Action Group be advised of the Committee’s recommendation. |
GB 4 Town Terrace (formerly |
At Council’s meeting of 19 June 2006 Councillor David Bradbury raised a Question Without Notice concerning potential traffic safety issues in the vicinity of Glenmore Park Shopping Centre, in particular fronting the youth centre. The Glenmore Park
Youth Centre operates out of the Glenmore Park Community Centre located on
the corner of In response to
previous requests concerning the speed of vehicles using Speed
classification surveys were conducted on 16 October 2003 following
construction of the northern Watts Profile device, and determined that
approximately 4,205 vehicles per day (vpd) where using the northern end of
Luttrell Street at an 85th percentile speed of 34.7kph, and 3,702 vpd where using Town
Terrace at an 85th percentile speed of 45.7kph. The speed of
vehicles using Town Terrace and the potential conflicts with vehicles
negotiating out of parking spaces prompted the construction of another Watts
Profile device on the southern end of Town Terrace. A recent survey
conducted at the junction of · 111 vehicles proceeding southbound turned right from on · 77 vehicles proceeded southbound through from on · 100 vehicles turned left from the spine road into · 50 vehicles turned left from Town Terrace into the spine road with a
destination at the shopping centre. · 20 vehicles proceeded northbound from Town Terrace into It is clearly
evident from the above data that of the 308 vehicles which passed the
frontage of the youth centre, a substantial number of the vehicles (ie, 211
or approximately 70%) within the surveyed period had a legitimate destination
within the Glenmore Park Shopping Centre and that the introduction of traffic
management measures such as the closure of the southern end of Luttrell
Street would have a substantial impact on the accessibility of legitimate
users of the shopping centre. In
addition, the redirection of this traffic to Having regard to
the larger impacts any traffic management measures may have on the wider
precinct, further investigation, including extensive consultation with all
affected stakeholders (which includes the shopping centre management,
McDonalds and residents), will be required to determine the appropriate direction
on any future traffic management measures. RECOMMENDATION LTC 161 That: 1. The Committee note the information. 2. The existing ball and tube fencing at the
rear of the western kerb fronting the youth centre in Town Terrace (formerly 3. The youth centre be requested to erect a chainwire fence 2.4m on the open end of the basketball court. 4. Councillor
Bradbury be advised. |
GB
|
The
St Marys/Regentville Police representative advised that drivers are cutting
the corner on the bend at RECOMMENDATION LTC
162 That Council investigate provision
of double-barrier linemarking at the bend in |
GB 6 Bus
Stop Signage – Request to Paint Signage on Kerbs (Raised Westbus) |
The Westbus representative advised that bus
stop signs in certain locations are regularly removed by persons unknown, and
requested the Committee’s approval to paint “Bus Stop” on the kerb at these
locations in an attempt to discourage removal of the signs. RECOMMENDATION LTC
163 That Council investigate this
matter and advise Westbus of the outcome. |
GB
7 ANZAC Day March on Sunday, 22
April 2007 and ANZAC Day Dawn Procession & Service on Wednesday, 25 April
2007 (Raised Penrith Police) |
The Penrith
Police representative advised that an application has been received from the
Penrith RSL Sub-branch for approval to hold the ANZAC Day March between
2.30pm and 4.00pm on Sunday, 22 April 2007, and the ANZAC Day Dawn Procession
& Service between 4.30am
and 5.15am on Wednesday, 25 April 2007. Police advise that this is a Class 4 Event, and the route will be the same as in previous years. RECOMMENDATION LTC 164 That the Committee note the information. |
GB
8 Fatal Incident Response
Strategy Team (FIRST) Report (Raised
Penrith Police) |
The
Penrith Police representative tabled a report regarding the recent fatal
accident at the following location: The RECOMMENDATION LTC
165 That the Committee note the
information. |
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 11:05am.
That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 4 December, 2006 be adopted. |
Item Page
The
1 St
Marys Release Area - Adoption of draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and endorsement
of St Marys Penrith Planning Agreement for the South Dunheved Precinct. Applicant:
Maryland Development Company Pty Ltd.
Owner: St Marys Land Limited
2 Lease
of Arthur Neave Tennis Complex
3 Penrith
Whitewater Stadium Ltd - Board of Directors
The
City In Its Environment
4 Floodplain
Management Program 2006/2007 - Grant Offer
5
URGENT
9 Update
on the implementation of the Wallacia and Mulgoa Sewerage Scheme
Leadership
and Organisation
6 Decision
Making Arrangements During the Council Recess
7 Summary
of Investments & Banking for the period of 31 October 2006 to 27 November
2006
8 2006
National General Assembly of Local Government
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
The City in its Broader Context
There were no reports under this Master
Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
The
Item Page
1 St
Marys Release Area - Adoption of draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and endorsement
of St Marys Penrith Planning Agreement for the South Dunheved Precinct. Applicant:
Maryland Development Company Pty Ltd.
Owner: St Marys Land Limited
2 Lease
of Arthur Neave Tennis Complex
3 Penrith
Whitewater Stadium Ltd - Board of Directors
11
December 2006 |
|
The City as a Social Place |
|
The City as a
1 |
St
Marys Release Area - Adoption of draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and endorsement
of St Marys Penrith Planning Agreement for the |
|
Compiled by: Tony Crichton, Senior Environmental Planner
Authorised by: Roger Nethercote,
Environmental Planning Manager
Strategic Program Term Achievement: Strategies
are in place for new release areas to deliver jobs that match incoming
workforce participant numbers.
Critical Action: Work in partnership with the development
sector to formulate and implement tailored employment strategies that are
commensurate with the rate of housing development in new release areas.
Purpose:
To advise Council of the
completion of the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and related Planning Agreement
for the St Marys Release Area. The
report recommends adoption of the Dunheved Precinct Plan and Planning Agreement
subject to the inclusion of all agreed and negotiated amendments with the
proponent Lend Lease.
Background
On 16 June 2003, the
Minister for
The draft Dunheved Precinct Plan, which is a consolidated plan comprising both the North and South Dunheved Precincts, was jointly lodged with Penrith and Blacktown City Councils on 30 April 2005. The Precinct comprises a total area of 30.3 hectares of which 11.9 hectares forms the South Dunheved Precinct within Penrith LGA.
The Precinct Plan outlines provisions relating to the development of a precinct released by the Minister and includes elements such as phasing and distribution of land uses, public transport and road networks, indicative subdivision patterns, design, siting and construction guidelines, management of contamination risk, infrastructure requirements and public facilities requirements.
Council at its meeting on 27 June 2005 resolved to publicly exhibit the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan concurrently with Blacktown City Council. That exhibition occurred from 7 September to 5 October 2005.
A report was presented to the Policy Review Committee meeting on 22 May 2006, providing Council with an assessment of the submissions made during the public exhibition of the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan, which included an examination of the key issues and the amendments made to the draft Plan since its submission. The report also advised on the status of the draft Planning Agreement for the Dunheved Precinct. The report recommended support, in principle, for the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan, with amendments as agreed by the proponent and for a further report to be presented to Council following the exhibition of the draft Planning Agreement for Council’s consideration of the formal adoption of the two documents.
The report also
recommended that Council enter into a Heads of Agreement with Lend Lease
(formerly referred to as Delfin Lend Lease), regarding the proposed
Council resolved at its Policy Review Committee meeting on 22 May 2006 that:
1. The information contained in the report on St
Marys Release Area – Draft Dunheved Precinct Plan & Draft Planning Agreement
be received.
2. The proposed works schedules included in the
Attachments to this report be included in the draft Planning Agreement.
3. Council publicly exhibit the draft Planning
Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning &
Assessment Act, 1979 and Regulations and authorise the Legal Officer and
Environmental Planning Manager to finalise the content of the draft Planning
Agreement prior to the formal public exhibition process.
4. Further consideration of the draft Dunheved
Precinct Plan be deferred until the further report requested in the
confidential session of tonight’s Policy Review committee is submitted.
5. Lend Lease be advised of Council’s decision.
The draft Planning Agreement referred to in Item 3 has been negotiated with Lend Lease and was recently the subject of a public notice in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. A copy of the draft Agreement has been separately provided to Councillors.
The further report requested in Item 4 was considered in Committee of the Whole at Council’s Ordinary Meeting on 9 October 2006. Council resolved that:
1. The information contained in the report on St
Marys Release Area be received;
2. The recommendations made in the report of the
Committee of the Whole be adopted; and
3. A further report be brought back to Council
on the opportunities available to Council to seek indemnity in relation to
future property transfers.
Council was satisfied that appropriate mechanisms are in place for dealing with the level of risk associated with the previous contamination of the site and indicated it was appropriate to move forward with consideration of the adoption of the Dunheved Precinct Plan.
The opportunities to seek additional indemnity in relation to future property transfers are continuing to be examined and a further report will be brought back to Council on these matters.
Draft Dunheved Precinct Plan
In the report to Council’s Policy Review Committee on 22 May 2006, it was advised that a number of minor issues relating to some of the management plans and strategies which support the Dunheved Precinct Plan, although agreed to with the proponent, were yet to be included in the documents. We have now received a completed copy of the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and supporting documents. A copy of the latest amended version of the draft Precinct Plan has been provided separately to Councillors.
The previous report to Council also identified a number of other
matters which required further clarification.
These related to use of recycled effluent, ongoing maintenance
of drainage/riparian corridors and other future Council-owned assets and minor
proposed changes to the St Marys Contamination Management Plan. There were also issues raised by the Ministry
of Transport associated with the provision of bus services to the estate given
that the other precincts that would provide the necessary bus connections have
not yet developed. The status of these
matters is outlined below:
1.
Use of Recycled Effluent
During discussions over the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan, Lend Lease
was asked to negotiate the delivery of a recycled effluent scheme for the
Dunheved Precinct, given that it is advancing the installation of the
infrastructure required to reticulate recycled effluent to the Eastern (Ropes
Crossing) Precinct.
Lend Lease has introduced a recycled
effluent scheme into the Ropes Crossing (Eastern Precinct) residential
development and signalled its desire to extend that system to the Dunheved
Precinct. They have also advised that
negotiations have commenced and are continuing with Sydney Water in relation to
the delivery of treated effluent from the St Marys STP to the Dunheved
Precinct. Those commercial
considerations are yet to be finalised, however, Lend Lease has agreed to
include in the draft Precinct Plan the following intentions to provide recycled
effluent: (i) where feasible, the
development allotments are to be provided with a separate, piped supply of
treated effluent from the St Marys STP; (ii) rainwater tanks are to be provided
in accordance with the requirements of the Plan; and (iii) developments that
consume high volumes of water in their operation should incorporate recycling
initiatives in the plant’s operation to reduce the demand on water.
Given that effluent reuse and rainwater
capture and reuse are important sustainability elements, we will continue to
negotiation with Lend Lease and if required,
2.
Ongoing Maintenance of Drainage, Riparian Corridors, Roads and Asset
Protection Zone
During preparation of the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan, officers have carried out an investigation of the likely ongoing maintenance costs to Council of these assets, and have requested that a Maintenance Management Plan and schedule of estimates of costings be submitted to Council. This is currently being prepared by Lend Lease. Subsequent approval processes, particularly in relation to development applications, provide the opportunity to consider detailed costings of maintenance requirements once construction designs are completed.
We have requested that
the pre-handover periods for drainage basins, riparian corridors and
bioretention swales be set at 3 years, and the pre-handover times for bushland
and woodland be set at 12 months instead of 6 months. Lend Lease has agreed to our request for the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan to be approved
subject to the inclusion of these amendments.
3.
Contamination Management Plan
The St Marys Release Area has been the subject of extensive investigation and remediation through the 1990s. The work was undertaken with the full involvement of the EPA and subsequently authorised by an independent NSW EPA accredited Site Auditor who produced and issued the Site Audit Statements for the site. The site has been remediated to a level where it is considered to pose a negligible risk to the public or the environment.
The report considered at Council’s 9 October 2006 meeting outlined in some detail the St Marys Release site audit process and the investigations relating to the contamination and remediation investigations. One of the requirements of the Site Audit Statement was that an appropriate Contamination Management Plan (CMP) be developed and implemented which includes procedures for the safe handling and disposal of contamination that may be found during earthworks.
A CMP was prepared and submitted in support of the Dunheved Precinct Plan and presents information from the remediation and validation reports for the area which covers the Dunheved Precinct. The CMP provides a framework for identifying and addressing any unexpected discovery of chemical contamination or potentially explosive ordnance and addresses requirements to ensure a safe working environment.
Our assessment of the CMP lodged is that it accords with the conditions set down in the Site Audit Statement prepared for the site and provides an appropriate set of procedures to deal with any residual contamination risk. Notwithstanding, we also have sought advice from the independent accredited auditor who issued the principal Site Audit Statement for the St Marys Release as to whether, in his opinion, the submitted Contamination Management Plan for the Dunheved Precinct met the intent of the requirements outlined in the Site Audit Statement. We were advised that the Plan does meet the intent of the requirements outlined but that it would be beneficial for a minor amendment to be made which includes reference to the potential for asbestos cement fragments to be found on site. We have discussed this minor change with Lend Lease and they have agreed to make the necessary amendments to the Dunheved Contamination Management Plan.
4. Bus Services
The Ministry of Transport (MOT), in its recent comments, raised the need for bus connectivity to be provided from the Dunheved Precinct to adjacent industrial areas and the residential precincts to be located in the St Marys Release Area.
A series of public transport improvements were identified in the Transport Management Study undertaken in 2005, including promotion of public transport use and subsidisation of the cost of an interim bus service. Monetary contributions towards these initiatives are included in the Deed entered into between Lend Lease and the State Government.
The initial planning for
the St Marys Release made provision for loop bus services to run through the
existing
The provision of effective
bus services is fundamental to achieving the mode shift to greater use of
public transport for the estate, and the MOT has raised concerns regarding the
service levels that could be provided given the constraints on the road
network. MOT has also advised that this
development should also connect with the strategic bus corridor that is
proposed to run along
In our opinion, the
proposed link road connecting
Planning Agreement
A draft outline Development Agreement was lodged with Council in August 2005, and was subsequently considered by Council as part of the suite of documents placed on exhibition with the Draft Precinct Plan. The outline Development Agreement identified the basic infrastructure requirements needed to support the Dunheved Precinct which would be delivered by the developer.
The Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (EP&A Act) has been recently amended to provide alternative developer contribution mechanisms to the traditional Section 94 Plan approach. The legislation, amongst other things, introduced the concept of voluntary Planning Agreements which can be entered into by Council and a development proponent to establish a mechanism for the identification and funding of public facilities and infrastructure to support development.
Given this, we have taken the view that Council should utilise the new legislation. This resulted in the preparation of a draft Planning Agreement which follows the statutory requirements and can also be included under Part 3 of the existing St Marys Development Agreement that Lend Lease has entered into with the State Government. Council’s solicitors have provided legal opinion on this approach and advise there is no disadvantage to Council.
The Council report on 22 May 2006 outlined the proposed content of the draft Planning Agreement and included the schedules of the proposed local transport, open space and stormwater infrastructure works required to be delivered to support the development of the Dunheved Precinct. Council resolved to authorise the Legal Officer and Environmental Planning Manager to finalise the content of the Agreement prior to any formal public notification process.
The draft Planning Agreement for the Dunheved Precinct has been finalised with extensive input from Council’s lawyers, Phillips Fox and agreement reached with Lend Lease on its provisions. Under the provisions of the EP&A Act, public notice of the proposed Planning Agreement, together with the required Explanatory Note, was given from 3 November until 4 December 2006.
Relevant material including the proposed Planning Agreement, Explanatory Note, a Structure Plan map of the St Marys Release Area and a colour aerial photo of the South Dunheved Precinct was displayed at the following venues: Penrith City Council foyer, Penrith Library, Penrith City Council’s St Marys office and the St Marys Library. Public notice of the proposed Planning Agreement was also displayed in local newspapers.
A copy of the proposed St Marys Penrith Planning Agreement was provided to all Councillors in November 2006. Also, a copy is available at the Council meeting if required.
No submissions have been received in relation to the proposed Planning Agreement.
We are satisfied that the nominated work negotiated in the proposed Planning Agreement represents a substantial contribution to the infrastructure required to support the development of the Dunheved Precinct within Penrith.
As all negotiations have been completed for both the required physical works and also the detailed legal requirements, it is considered that Council can now endorse the proposed St Marys Penrith Planning Agreement, including the proposed works schedules.
Proposed
Lend Lease has submitted
to Council a draft Concept Plan for a link road between the Christie Street/Lee
Holm Road intersection to a point adjacent to the Dunheved Golf Course. The
Concept Plan nominates a proposed route and an initial estimate of costings.
This proposal was presented to the Councillor Workshop held on 8 May and has
been referred to the RTA who have been requested to confirm a preferred
intersection geometry with
Council in its last consideration of the Dunheved Precinct Plan sought that further discussions be held with Lend Lease and the RTA concerning the most appropriate means to achieve the new link road. Since that time, we have had extensive discussions with these two stakeholders, as well as the convener of the Dunheved Industrial Development Committee.
We have negotiated with
the RTA for the dedication of part of the RTA’s land in
Given that pursuing the delivery of the link road and resolving all relevant issues will take some time, we have discussed with Lend Lease the most appropriate mechanism for moving forward to determine the final design, funding arrangements and delivery mechanism for the link road. To facilitate this process, a draft Heads of Agreement between Council and Lend Lease has been drawn up which contemplates the establishment of a Project Control Group to advance the design, funding and construction of the link road and to determine options for the best manner in which adjoining lands could assist in facilitating this process.
The proposed Heads of Agreement will be the subject of a separate report to tonight’s Council meeting.
Conclusion
The Dunheved Precinct will make a notable contribution to delivering
new employment opportunities, not only in relation to the St Marys Release Area
development, but also in relation to Council’s aspirations for creating new
jobs across the City.
The public submissions made to the exhibition of the draft Dunheved
Precinct Plan reported to Council’s meeting of 22 May 2006 have been carefully
assessed and it is considered that the issues raised have been effectively
dealt with in relation to the proposals advanced by Lend Lease and the
amendments made to the draft Precinct Plan.
The submissions received from the State Government authorities have
been appropriately addressed and the relevant aspects identified incorporated
in the amended draft Precinct Plan. As
discussed earlier in this report, further discussions need to occur with the
Ministry of Transport to ascertain the most appropriate approach to the
provision of bus services to this estate.
The contamination management of the site has been the subject of recent
detailed consideration by Council and an effective approach resolved.
All matters relating to the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and
related St Marys Penrith Planning Agreement have now been completed and as
such, these are now recommended to be adopted by Council.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on St Marys Release Area -
Adoption of draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and endorsement of St Marys Penrith
Planning Agreement for the South Dunheved Precinct be received. 2. Council adopt the Dunheved Precinct Plan submitted by Lend Lease, with the amendments agreed to by the proponents outlined in the report. 3. The St Marys Penrith Planning Agreement for the South Dunheved Precinct including the proposed works schedules be endorsed. 4. The Common
Seal of the Council of the City of 5. Council write
to the Ministry of Transport to confirm the appropriate approach and timing
for the delivery of bus services in the Dunheved Precinct and the 6. Council provide written responses to all public authorities or persons who made submissions to the public exhibition for the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan. 7. Blacktown City Council be advised of Council’s decision and that joint arrangements be put in place to ensure the orderly and timely development of the two Precincts. 8. Lend Lease be advised of Council’s decision. |
1. View |
St Marys Development Precinct Plan |
1 Page |
Appendix |
2. View |
Dunheved Precinct Framework Plan |
1 Page |
Appendix |
Policy Review Committee meeting report of
22 May 2006 |
37 Pages |
Attachment |
11
December 2006 |
|
The City as a Social Place |
|
The City as a
2 |
Lease
of Arthur Neave Tennis Complex |
|
Compiled by: Erik Henricksen, Pools Superintendent
Authorised by: Gary Dean,
Facilities Operations Manager
Requested
By: Councillor Garry Rumble
Strategic Program Term Achievement: The
City’s recreation and leisure facilities and services meet its needs and are
optimally used.
Critical Action: Facilitate joint use of the City’s
recreation and leisure facilities, including co-location of programs.
Purpose:
To advise Council of the
Expressions of Interest received for a 5-year lease of the Arthur Neave Tennis
Complex located in Werrington. The
report recommends that the 5-year lease to Mr David Deep of Indeep Tennis &
Fitness be endorsed.
Background
The Arthur Neave Tennis
Complex is currently managed by Penrith City Council’s Facilities Operations
Department. Council officers oversee
the maintenance, presentation and general upkeep of the complex and its equipment. Arrangements are in place whereby a local
business within the
Council was approached approximately three years ago to lease the complex. In accordance with the appropriate procedures pertaining to the leasing of community land, an Expression of Interest document was prepared and advertised.
Unfortunately, the original interested party was unable to commit to their initial request. There were no other submissions at that time.
In recent years, some
informal discussions were held with the Nepean District Tennis Association,
with a view to extending their lease of the
Facility
Description
The Arthur Neave Tennis Complex comprises:
· 4
full-size plexi-pave tennis courts with court lighting, fencing, nets and
umpire chairs. All 4 courts were
re-surfaced in 2005;
· a small amenities block to serve the
courts, including change rooms, toilets and storage rooms;
· a landscaped and paved area overlooking the courts, which presently accommodates tables and chairs and forms an attractive relaxation area. There are also 4 undercover observation areas;
Current Situation
Council was approached, in September this year, by Mr David Deep of Indeep International Tennis and Fitness Pty Ltd, seeking opportunities to lease a tennis complex in Penrith. Mr Deep indicated that the four-court Arthur Neave Complex at Werrington would suit his purpose. Mr Deep was advised of the process required and was encouraged to provide a submission on that basis.
In accordance with those procedures for the lease of community land an Expression of Interest document was prepared and advertised for the appropriate period.
Two submissions were received, Indeep Tennis and Fitness Pty Ltd and Mr Kenneth Gates. A copy of each submission is included in the attachments.
Submission Review
Kenneth S Gates
Mr Gates has been involved with tennis in Penrith for approximately 21 years, originally associated with the Panthers Tennis Complex in 1985, and for the ensuing 11 years. Mr Gates sold the lease to the Penrith Rugby League Club in 1996, and has since conducted his coaching business at Arthur Neave Complex at Werrington, in conjunction with the use of Blue Mountains Council’s Lapstone facility.
Mr Gates’ association
with the Werrington Complex is on a court hire basis, this usage consisting of
coaching
9-10 hours hire of one court per week.
Mr Gates has indicated a desire to promote tennis, maximise court usage and expand his existing operations by introducing:
· Ladies social competitions
· Night social tennis
· Beginners tennis coaching
· Mixed and Men’s competitions
Mr Gates requested a 5 year lease and has tendered a price of $15,000 per annum for the first year increasing by the CPI for each of the subsequent 4 years.
Indeep Tennis and
Fitness Pty Ltd
David Deep (founding Director of Indeep Tennis and Fitness Pty Ltd) provides endorsements from Mr Anthony Richardson, National High Performance Academy Manager of Tennis NSW and Mr Craig Watson, CEO of Tennis NSW in his submission.
Mr Deep’s submission indicates extensive experience in the tennis industry over 15 years as a player, manager, coach and marketer. Mr Deep’s qualifications include:
· Tennis
· Tennis Coaches
· ASCA (
· Diploma in Sports Marketing
Mr Deep’s coaching team also includes a Head Coach, Mr David Hall, a Paralympic Gold Medallist, World No. 2 Singles Wheelchair Tennis Player and winner of 8 US Open Titles.
Indeep Tennis and Fitness proposed programming for Arthur Neave Tennis Complex includes:
· Social
1. Ladies Clinics (coach to player ratio – 1:4)
2. Tennis Fit Class (coach to player ratio – 1:6)
3. Social Night
4. Family Days
5. Tournament Travel
· Participation
1. Pee Wee Children’s Tennis (Ages 3-5. Coach to player ratio – 1:4)
2. Group Coaching (coach to player ratio – 1:6)
3. Private Lessons
4. Wheelchair Squads (coach to player ratio – 1:4)
5. Tournament Travel
· Development and Elite
1. Development Squad (coach to player ratio – 1:4)
2. Elite Squad (coach to player ratio – 1:3)
3. Wheelies (coach to player ratio – 1:4)
4. Full Time Program (coach to player ratio – 1:4)
5. National and International Tournament Travel
Mr Deep has requested a 5 year lease and has tendered an amount of $16,000 per annum which will be subject to annual CPI increases.
Summary
Of the two proposals received Indeep International Tennis and Fitness Pty Ltd provided a more comprehensive insight into their commitment to provide and promote tennis in Penrith. They offer a broader range of programs which includes elite level and disabled coaching opportunities in conjunction with an administrative / marketing mix which is considered an advantage in promoting tennis in the area.
Mr Gates’ submission outlines a 21 year history of tennis involvement in the Penrith District. He currently uses the Arthur Neave facility (in conjunction with other venues) to conduct his coaching activities on a “court hire basis”. His utilisation of this facility equates to approximately one court for 9 hours per week. Mr Gates also indicates that he would seek to increase participation levels at this complex by introducing additional coaching opportunities and competitions.
Council needs to consider that, should the proposal of Indeep International Tennis and Fitness Pty Ltd be successful the business activities of Mr Gates at Arthur Neave will be displaced. It would be inappropriate to expect any new lessee to accommodate competing coaching services at the venue. Should this scenario eventuate, Council officers would assist to relocate Mr Gates to another tennis venue. It is understood that the St Marys complex may be able to assist in this matter as well as other tennis venues nearby.
The monetary difference between the two proposals is insignificant ($1,000 per annum).
Over the last decade or
so there has been a steady decline in the popularity of tennis across
The proposal from Indeep International Tennis and Fitness Pty Ltd to promote tennis in the Penrith LGA will support those initiatives and offer opportunity to “grow” the sport in the local area. As such Indeep International Tennis and Fitness Pty Ltd is the preferred tenderer.
Procedures
Community land such as Arthur Neave is required to be used and managed in accordance with the Plans of Management applying to the land.
The leasing of the land for tennis court operations, to an interested operator, can be granted for a purpose consistent with the core objectives of the Community Plans of Management.
The maximum number of years relating to any Lease is five (5) years. If the proposed lessee require any more years, then Council may only grant such a Lease by tender (unless it is granted to a non-profit organisation) and Ministerial approval.
Property Development Manager’s comment
The amount tendered by both Mr Gates ($15,000 per annum) and Indeep Tennis and Fitness Pty Ltd ($16,000 per annum) is consistent with rent attributed to Council’s other tennis court complex (St Clair), leased in a similar manner.
The St Clair Tennis Complex is a 6 court complex, leased over 5 years, and attracts a rental that is equivalent to approx $3,700 per annum per court.
The submissions received from the interested parties, in response to Council’s advertised “Expressions of Interest”, are considered to be fair and reasonable.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Lease of Arthur Neave
Tennis Complex be received. 2. Council agree to enter into a 5-year lease with Indeep International
Tennis and Fitness Pty Ltd in accordance with the arrangements as outlined in
this report. 3. Council agree with the rental payment in the amount of $16,000 per
annum (plus GST) and subject to CPI increases on each anniversary over the
term of the lease. 4. Mr Gates be advised that his submission was unsuccessful. 5. Mr Gates be thanked for his involvement in providing tennis coaching at Arthur Neave Tennis Complex and that Council officers will assist as far as practicable in relocating his activities to another tennis venue. |
Indeep International EOI for Arthur Neave
Tennis |
12 Pages |
Attachment |
|
Ken Gates EOI for Arthur Neave Tennis |
2 Pages |
Attachment |
11
December 2006 |
|
The City as a Social Place |
|
The City as a
3 |
Penrith
Whitewater Stadium Ltd - Board of Directors
|
|
Compiled by: Gary Dean, Facilities Operations Manager
Authorised by: Steve Hackett,
Director - City Services
Strategic Program Term Achievement: The
City’s recreation and leisure facilities and services meet its needs and are
optimally used.
Critical Action: Facilitate joint use of the City’s
recreation and leisure facilities, including co-location of programs.
Purpose:
To advise Council of the nomination
received from Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd for the appointment of a new Board
member to fill the vacancy recently created at the Annual General Meeting. The Board seeks Council endorsement of its
nomination. The report recommends that
Council endorse the appointment of Mr George Dodds to the Board of Penrith
Whitewater Stadium Ltd.
Background
Council, at its Policy Review Committee Meeting on 13 November 2006, received a report following the Eighth Annual General Meeting of Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd held on 28 September 2006.
That report advised that one of the Directors, Mr Conrad Ozog, had resigned in accordance with the Articles of Association of the Company and did not seek re-appointment. Council was advised that a replacement Director was being pursued by the Board.
Current Situation
The Board of Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd met on 23 November 2006. One of the matters considered by the Board at that meeting was the nomination of Mr George Dodds to fill the vacancy on the Board.
Mr Dodds has extensive experience at a senior management level, both in NSW and Victoria. He has qualifications in engineering and environmental management. He has completed appointments at a senior level in the Sydney Catchment Authority, NSW Fisheries and the Environmental Protection Authority. Full details of Mr Dodds’ qualifications and experience are included in the attachments.
The Board felt that Mr Dodds would be a most suitable replacement for the Director’s position on the Board. As such, the Board has resolved to seek Council’s endorsement of the appointment of Mr Dodds.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Penrith Whitewater Stadium
Ltd - Board of Directors be received. 2. Council endorse the appointment of Mr George Dodds as a Director on the Board of Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd. |
1. View |
Biographical Information - George Dodds |
1 Page |
Appendix |
The City In Its Environment
Item Page
4 Floodplain
Management Program 2006/2007 - Grant Offer
5
URGENT
9 Update
on the implementation of the Wallacia and Mulgoa Sewerage Scheme
11
December 2006 |
|
The City in its Environment |
|
The City in its Environment
4 |
Floodplain
Management Program 2006/2007 - Grant Offer
|
|
Compiled by: Maruf Hossain, Engineering Stormwater Supervisor
Authorised by: Craig Ross, Design
and Technical Advice Manager
Strategic Program Term Achievement: A
floodplain management policy to protect the built environment is being
implemented by Council consistent with Government guidelines.
Critical Action: Council’s Floodplain Management Policy is
contemporary and is being implemented.
Purpose:
To notify Council of a grant
offer under the New South Wales Government Financial Assistance Program for the
Penrith Overland Flow Flood Study under the Floodplain Management Program 2006/2007. The report recommends that the offer be
accepted.
Background
The NSW Government’s
Flood Policy is directed at providing solutions to existing flooding problems
in developed areas, and ensuring that new developments are compatible with the
flood hazard and do not create additional flooding problems in other
areas. Under the Policy, the management
of flood prone land remains the responsibility of local government. To facilitate this, the Government has
published the NSW Floodplain Development Manual, to provide guidance to
councils in the implementation of the Policy, and provides funding in support
of floodplain management programs.
Council is currently
undertaking major flood studies under the “Penrith Overland Flow Flood
Study”. The studies include:
·
· Review of South Creek Flood Study
· Penrith Overland Flow ‘Overview’ Study.
These studies, together with the aerial photographs and contour information for the whole LGA, have been funded through an initial grant offer under the Flood Management Program.
Under this program, these studies, and any subsequent studies for the Overland Flow sub catchments, are classed as “continuing projects”, giving them funding priority.
The initial project cost was estimated to be in the order of $600,000, and the Department of Natural Resources made a notional allocation of $400,000, which was complemented by a Council allocation of $200,000 for the project. Funding was being made available on a 2:1 (Government : Council) basis. The department has made payments based on actual expenditure for the studies, allocated in each financial year, though separate grant allocations.
Current Situation
The Minister for Natural
Resources, Primary Industries and Mineral Resources, the Hon Ian MacDonald MLC,
has offered Council funding for the Floodplain Management Program 2006-07. This is to cover the costs of the current
round of studies under this year’s program.
The amount of the grant offer is $50,000 with a funding ratio of 2:1 (State:Council). Council’s contribution for the amount of
$25,000 can be made from the funds remaining in Council’s initial project
allocation.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Floodplain Management
Program 2006/2007 - Grant Offer be received. 2. The State Assisted Floodplain
Management Grant offer of $50,000 from the Minister for Natural Resources for
the Floodplain Management Program be accepted. 3. The Minister be thanked for the grant offer. |
There are no attachments for this report.
11
December 2006 |
|
The City in its Environment |
|
The City in its Environment
5 |
|
|
Compiled by: Craig Ross, Design and Technical Advice Manager
Authorised by: Craig Ross, Design
and Technical Advice Manager
Strategic Program Term Achievement: Development
is designed, constructed and maintained to deliver improved sustainability
outcomes.
Critical Action: Develop and implement sustainability
criteria for the planning, design, construction and maintenance of new
development.
Purpose:
To seek Council's endorsement
to enter into a Works in Kind Agreement for the construction of a detention
basin in the
Background
The planning for the
Claremont Meadows Estate has made provision for a regional detention basin to
mitigate the increased runoff from the estate.
This drainage basin is proposed to be located north of
A plan of the basin location is attached.
Current Situation
Under Council’s Section 94 protocols, Council’s approval is required to enter into a Works in Kind Agreement for such works. The protocols also require the works to be subjected to a tender process and be scrutinised by a Council engaged Quantity Surveyor to ensure that the proposed works are assigned a true monetary value. The Works in Kind credits are also limited to the S94 Plan’s budget amount for the works.
The developer has called tenders for the drainage basin construction, and has received six tenders, and indicated the lowest as their preferred tenderer. The tenders have been assessed by Council’s Quantity Surveyor, who has indicated that the construction costs are fair and reasonable. The preferred tenderer is J K Williams for the tender amount of $581,083.50. The design and supervision costs for the basin construction amount to $48,210.24, giving a total project cost of $629,293.74.
The S94 Plan budget amount, after indexation to September 2006, comes to $578,248, leaving a shortfall of $51,045.74.
This matter has been discussed with the developer, who has indicated that he is prepared to carry out the works and bear the shortfall in costs. On satisfactory completion of the works, the developer will receive a total credit $578,248 against their S94 obligations for their development.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Claremont Meadows Drainage
Works in Kind Agreement: Developer - UPL (No. 9) Pty Ltd be received. 2. Council enter into a Works in Kind Agreement with UPL (No. 9) for the drainage basin construction as outlined in this report. |
1. View |
|
1 Page |
Appendix |
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
The City as an Economy
There were no reports under this Master
Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
The City Supported by Infrastructure
There were no reports under this Master
Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Leadership and Organisation
Item Page
6 Decision
Making Arrangements During the Council Recess
7 Summary
of Investments & Banking for the period of 31 October 2006 to 27 November
2006
8 2006
National General Assembly of Local Government
11
December 2006 |
|
Leadership and Organisation |
|
Leadership and Organisation
6 |
Decision
Making Arrangements During the Council Recess |
|
Compiled by: Cristy Stevens, Administration Officer - Policy and
Council Support
Authorised by: Glenn McCarthy,
Executive Officer
Strategic Program Term Achievement: Council
has implemented leading practice ethical and corporate governance standards.
Critical Action: Review and apply leading practice ethical
and corporate governance standards.
Purpose:
To inform Councillors of the
decision-making arrangements during the Council Recess. The report recommends that the information be
received and that the General Manager, in consultation with the Mayor, be
delegated authority to determine Development Application No. 06/1766, lodged by
Councillor Cettolin.
Background
Tonight’s meeting is the last Ordinary Meeting for 2006 and the first Ordinary Meeting in 2007 will be on 12 February.
During Council’s recess, the General Manager, in consultation with the Mayor, has extensive delegations to deal with issues, other than policy and those matters that cannot be delegated under the Local Government Act, that come before Council during the break. The role of the Mayor is, among other things, to exercise, in cases of necessity, the policy-making functions of the governing body of the Council between meetings of the Council.
At its Ordinary Meeting of 6 December 2004, Council adopted a policy on the decision-making arrangements in relation to development applications during Council’s Christmas recess. A copy of the policy is appended to this report for Councillors’ reference.
Councillors who have matters to raise during the break can contact the General Manager, or Directors and Managers, to have them dealt with as quickly as possible. Councillors will be provided with a contact list for Directors and Managers and the people who will be acting for them in cases of leave.
Development
Services Manager’s Comments
Council is currently in receipt of Development
Application No.06/1766 lodged on 17 November 2006 by Councillor Cettolin. The
application proposes the fit-out and use of a new shop unit at
Item 4 of Council’s adopted policy excludes the General Manager from having delegation to determine development applications where the applicant is a Councillor. It is recommended that this policy be varied in this instance given:
· the minor nature of the proposal
· That the application does not require notification under Council’s Notification and Advertising DCP
· That the application would not otherwise be determined until February at the earliest
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Decision Making Arrangements During the
Council Recess be received. 2. The General Manager, in consultation with the Mayor, be delegated authority to determine Development Application No. 06/1766. |
1. View |
ES 002 Policy on Decision Making
Arrangements |
2 Pages |
Appendix |
11 December 2006 |
|
Appendix
1 - Summary of Investments |
|
|
|
Leadership and Organisation
7 |
Summary
of Investments & Banking for the period of 31 October 2006 to 27 November
2006 |
|
Compiled by: Pauline Johnston, Expenditure Accountant
Authorised by: Vicki O’Kelly,
Acting Chief Financial Officer
Strategic Program Term Achievement: Council
provides adequate resources to deliver its program and has introduced measures
to increase its capacity.
Critical Action: Maximise funding opportunities to deliver
Council’s program.
Purpose:
To provide summary of
investments for the period 31 October 2006 to 27 November 2006, and a
Reconciliation of Invested Funds at 27 November 2006. The report recommends the information be
received.
Background
CERTIFICATE OF
RESPONSIBLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER
I hereby certify the following:
1. All investments have been
made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1999, relevant
regulations and Council’s Investment Policy.
2. Council’s Cash Book and Bank Statements have
been reconciled as at 27 November 2006.
Barry Husking
Responsible
Accounting Officer
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Summary of Investments
& Banking for the period of 31 October 2006 to 27 November 2006 be
received. 2. The Certificate of the Responsible
Accounting Officer and Summaries of Investments and Performance for the
period 31 October 2006 to 27 November 2006 be noted and accepted. 3. The graphical
investment analysis as at 27 November 2006 be noted. |
1. View |
Summary of Investments |
3 Pages |
Appendix |
11
December 2006 |
|
Leadership and Organisation |
|
Leadership and Organisation
8 |
2006
National General Assembly of Local Government |
|
Compiled by: Glenn McCarthy, Executive Officer
Authorised by: Alan Stoneham,
Director - City Strategy
Strategic Program Term Achievement: Council
has reviewed its own role and operations and has adopted contemporary practices
to best discharge its charter.
Critical Action: Review current structures and procedures
supporting Council and Councillors responsibilities.
Purpose:
To provide details of the
outcomes of the National General Assembly of Local Government held in Canberra
from 27 to 30 November 2006. The report recommends that the information be
received.
Background
The Australian Local Government Association’s (ALGA) policies are
determined at its Annual General Meeting and by a National General Assembly of
Local Government. The General Assembly has a wide brief to consider policy
directions and convey the views of Councils to the Annual General Meeting and
National Executive.
This year’s General Assembly was held in
Council’s delegates to the National General Assembly were Councillors
Susan Page and Jim Aitken OAM, supported by the General Manager, Alan Travers
and Director – City Strategy, Alan Stoneham.
National General Assembly Program
In his opening address, Councillor Paul Bell AM, ALGA President, said that local government has had a watershed year in terms of the '3Fs' campaign. In relation to two of the 'F's' - Fair Treatment and Formal Recognition, Cr Bell said that milestones included strengthened partnerships, the signing of the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) to stop cost shifting, and the historic parliamentary resolution on recognition of local government passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate recently.
Keynote speakers included:
The Hon Jim Lloyd MP, Minister for Local Government, Territories and Roads
Mr Grahame Morris - Chairman of Federal Government Services for
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Emeritus Mayor Peter
Woods OAM,
Secretary General, United Cities and Local Governments (
Senator The Hon Santo Santoro, Minister for Ageing
Senator Kim Carr, Shadow Minister for Housing, Urban
Development, Local Government and Territories
Mayor Barry Easther –
Councillor, West Tamar Council (
Ms Jenny Macklin MP, Deputy Leader of the Opposition
Outcome of Motions Submitted by Council
Council has a very successful track record in past years at influencing
the development of national local government policy.
All motions adopted
by the General Assembly were put forward to the ALGA Annual General Meeting for
further consideration. A full copy of the resolutions of the National General
Assembly will be forwarded to Councillors when available from the ALGA.
As a result of the
motions submitted by Penrith City Council, the National General Assembly passed
the following resolutions:
· That this National General Assembly make
representations to the Prime Minister, the Hon. John Howard MP, the Minister
for Health and Ageing, the Hon. Tony Abbott MP, and the Minister for Families,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, the Hon. Mal Brough MP to address
the issue of the Commonwealth government financially contributing to the
accommodation costs of social and community services that are funded by the
Commonwealth, and housed in council facilities and buildings.
· That delegates of this National General
Assembly make submissions to the Draft Report on Waste Management, reinforcing
local government’s positive role in waste management.
2007 National General Assembly – Advanced Notice
The 2007 National
General Assembly of Local Government will be held in
In the past, in addition to selecting its voting delegate, Council has elected to send additional Councillors as observers.
Submitting Motions
Submission of motions is not required at this stage. A further report detailing suggested motions will be submitted to Council at a later date.
Conclusion
The National General
Assembly of Local Government provided delegates with the opportunity to
identify and share information on key issues facing local government in
That: 1. The information contained in the report on 2006 National General Assembly of Local Government be received. 2. Council nominate its voting delegate for the 2007 National General Assembly of Local Government. 3. Council nominate those Councillors that will attend as observers at the 2007 National General Assembly of Local Government. 4. Leave of
Absence be granted to all Councillors attending the 2007 National General
Assembly of Local Government to be held in |
There are no attachments for this report.
Urgent Reports
MASTER
PROGRAM REPORTS
CONTENTS
Item Page
9 Update
on the implementation of the Wallacia and Mulgoa Sewerage Scheme
11
December 2006 |
|
The City in its Environment |
|
The City in its Environment
9 |
Update
on the implementation of the Wallacia and Mulgoa Sewerage Scheme |
|
Compiled by: Graham Pares, Environmental Health Coordinator
Authorised by: Wayne Mitchell,
Environmental Health Manager
Requested
By: Councillor Ross Fowler
Strategic Program Term Achievement: The
health of the river system is being improved through the implementation of a
comprehensive catchment management strategy.
Critical Action: Effectively manage sewerage impacts
including the sewering of the rural villages.
Purpose:
To provide options for
consideration to support residents in the flood affected portion of the Mulgoa
Wallacia Sewer Scheme Catchment. The
report recommends that interest free loans be made available, upon application,
to the owners of flood affected properties in Wallacia, to a maximum value of
$4,000, to assist with the costs associated with connection to the sewerage
scheme.
Background
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 4 December 2006, a report was considered providing information on the progress of connection to the Mulgoa/Wallacia Sewer Scheme. The report identified an issue in the increased costs of connection for residents whose properties lie within the 1 in 100 year flood zone in Wallacia. The increased costs are associated with the additional tank, pump and electrical works needed to comply with Plumbing Code requirements to prevent entry of floodwater into the main sewer system.
Council resolved to seek a further report for its next meeting, regarding potential financial assistance for owners of properties affected by the ‘1 in 100 year’ flood level, to offset the additional cost of connection to the Scheme.
Support for
Connection
The affected area within the ‘1 in 100 year’ flood zone in Wallacia involves 49 residential properties. Figures provided by Sydney Water indicate that five properties in the flood-affected area have already connected to the sewer and a further six are about to connect. This represents a 22% connection rate, which is not far behind the 31% overall connection rate.
The owners of the 49 flood affected properties were approached to determine what costs they are facing to connect to the sewer. Advice from residents during that process indicated that the quoted costs were consistently $6,000 to $8,000 higher than neighbours who were not flood affected. Subsequent to this advice, Council officers undertook some preliminary research into the costs of these pump units. Some suppliers indicated prices in the $2,000 to $3,000 range, which was significantly lower than those being quoted by some plumbers. Sydney Water has been advised of this issue, and they have started providing more details to plumbers working in the area. Some of the plumbing supply companies are now also attempting to promote their products better in the Wallacia area. This information should enable residents to reduce connection costs significantly. Sydney Water has also agreed to write to the 49 property owners and explain the reason for the pump station and to also provide details of known suppliers.
A
petition has also been received from 23 people representing 15 of the flood
affected properties. This petition
requests “that
A number of residents also suggested that they were disadvantaged as a result of Council amending the flood zone after they had built or purchased their properties.
Options for consideration in providing support for the identified affected residents could include:
· Continuation of negotiations with pump manufacturers, Sydney Water and plumbers working in the area, to minimise the price associated with installing the pump station. This information will be made available to all residents within the affected area
· Consideration of the exceptional circumstances for these properties when orders are served to require connection. Such consideration would include an extension on the time permitted for connection beyond the preferred twelve-month period
· Provision of interest free loans up to a value of $4,000. This should cover any additional costs as a result of the flood affectation.
Financial
Services Manager’s comment
The charge to residents that use Council’s sullage removal service is subsidised by a special rate variation approved in 2004-05. Council has also previously endorsed a proposal to pay for the removal of solid waste from tanks, following connection to the sewerage scheme, to enable the tanks to be used as rainwater tanks. Sufficient funds remain in the Reserve, after allowing for this service, to allow some level of assistance to the flood affected properties, if Council desires.
Council could advance an interest free loan of up to $4,000 to assist the flood affected properties with their specific connection costs (collection tank, pump and associated electrical work). A loan agreement would be put in place between the property owner and Council, stipulating the terms of the agreement. The proposed terms of the interest free loan would include the requirement for a direct debit arrangement to be set up to ensure payment of the loan within an agreed period. It is suggested that the term of the loan should be one that sees the debt repaid at approximately the same rate as the sullage pump-out fee currently being paid by property owners (3 years).
Consideration has been given to securing the loan as a caveat against the property, however the costs of placing such a caveat (including Council’s internal costs) are disproportionate to the amount of the debt, however the debt can be noted on the s603 certificate in the event the property is sold. If there are defaults, then the debts will be pursued through the normal debt recovery mechanisms against the property owners.
These loans can be advanced from the Reserve established for the management of the monies raised through the special rate variation. Procedures for such loans would need to be established first and then residents would be notified of their availability.
Conclusion
Investigations have identified an issue of hardship in terms of the cost of connection to the new sewerage scheme for flood affected properties in Wallacia. It seems that some initial quotations may have been too high, but inquiries have determined that additional costs above other residents should be no more than $4,000. If an interest free loan was offered by Council, to a maximum value of $4,000, it will help to ensure that these residents are able to quickly connect to the sewer. The full benefits of the new sewerage scheme will only be realised when the majority of premises are connected.
Residents in these flood affected properties will also now be much better informed about the options and costs associated with the additional pump stations that are required. This will ensure that they are better able to negotiate on the connection costs.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Update on the
implementation of the Wallacia and Mulgoa Sewerage Scheme be received. 2. Interest free loans be made available upon application to the owners of flood affected properties in Wallacia to a maximum value of $4,000 to assist with costs associated with connection to the sewerage scheme. |
There are no attachments for this report.
MASTER PROGRAM REPORTS
CONTENTS
Pecuniary Interests
Other Interests
Monday December 11 2006
Item Page
1 Presence
of the Public 1
2 Commercial
Matter -
3 Commercial
Matter - Council Property - Dunheved Circuit &
4 Commercial
Matter - Council property, temporary License Agreement over the former
Cranebrook Hardware Store at 52-54 Laycock Street Cranebrook to the Christian
Outreach Centre.
5 Personnel
Matter - Industrial Relations Matters
Ordinary Meeting |
11 December 2006 |
Leadership and Organisation |
|
|
|
1 Presence of the Public
Everyone is entitled to attend a meeting of the Council and those of its Committees of which all members are Councillors, except as provided by Section 10 of the Local Government Act, 1993.
A Council, or a Committee of the Council of which all the members are Councillors, may close to the public so much of its meeting as comprises:
(a)
the discussion of any of the matters listed below; or
(b)
the receipt or discussion of any of the information so
listed.
The matters and information are the following:
(a)
personnel matters concerning particular individuals;
(b)
the personal hardship of any resident or ratepayers;
(c)
information that would, if disclosed, confer a
commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or
proposes to conduct) business;
(d)
commercial information of a confidential nature that
would, if disclosed:
·
prejudice the commercial position of the person who
supplied it; or
·
confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the
Council; or
·
reveal a trade secret.
(e)
information that would, if disclosed, prejudice the
maintenance of the law;
(f)
matters affecting the security of the Council,
Councillors, Council staff or Council property;
(g) advice concerning litigation, or advice
that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the
ground of legal professional privilege.
The grounds on which part of a meeting is closed must be stated in the decision to close that part of the meeting and must be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.
The grounds must specify the following:
(a)
the relevant provision of section 10A(2);
(b)
the matter that is to be discussed during the closed
part of the meeting;
(c)
the reasons why the part of the meeting is being
closed, including (if the matter concerned is a matter other than a personnel
matter concerning particular individuals, the personal hardship of a resident
or ratepayer or a trade secret) an explanation of the way in which discussion
of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public
interest.
Members of the public may make representations at a Council or Committee Meeting as to whether a part of a meeting should be closed to the public
The process which should be followed is:
·
a motion, based on the recommendation below, is moved
and seconded
·
the Chairperson then asks if any member/s of the
public would like to make representations as to whether a part of the meeting
is closed to the public
·
if a member/s of the public wish to make
representations, the Chairperson invites them to speak before the Committee
makes its decision on whether to close the part of the meeting or not to the
public.
·
if no member/s of the public wish to make
representations the Chairperson can then put the motion to close the meeting to
the public.
The first action is for a motion to be moved and seconded based on the recommendation below.
RECOMMENDATION
That:
City
in its Broader Context
2 Commercial Matter -
This item has been referred to Committee of
the Whole as the report refers to commercial information of a confidential
nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the
person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor
of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in
open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
City as an Economy
3 Commercial Matter - Council Property -
Dunheved Circuit &
This item has been referred to Committee of
the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer
a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or
proposes to conduct) business and discussion of the matter in open meeting
would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Leadership and Organisation
4 Commercial Matter - Council property,
temporary License Agreement over the former Cranebrook Hardware Store at 52-54
Laycock Street Cranebrook to the Christian Outreach Centre.
This item has been referred to Committee of
the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer
a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or
proposes to conduct) business and discussion of the matter in open meeting
would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Leadership and Organisation
5 Personnel Matter - Industrial Relations
Matters
This item has been referred to Committee of
the Whole as the report refers to personnel matters concerning particular
individuals and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance,
contrary to the public interest.
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
ATTACHMENTS
Date of Meeting: Monday 11 December 2006
Master Program: The City as a
Issue: New
Report Title: St Marys Release Area - Adoption
of draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and endorsement of St Marys Penrith Planning
Agreement for the South Dunheved Precinct.
Applicant: Maryland Development
Company Pty Ltd. Owner: St Marys Land Limited
Attachments: Policy Review Committee meeting
report of 22 May 2006
11 December 2006 |
|
Attachment
1 - Policy Review Committee meeting report of 22 May 2006 |
|
|
|
The City as a
7 |
ADI Site - Draft Dunheved Precinct Plan
& Draft Planning Agreement |
|
Compiled by: Tony Crichton, Senior
Environmental Planner
Authorised by: Roger Nethercote, Environmental Planning Manager
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: Cohesive communities are formed based on
sustainable, safe and satisfying living and working environments.
Critical Action: Prepare
and implement plans for each new release area that deliver quality, sustainable
living and working environments.
Purpose:
To provide Council with an assessment of the
draft Dunheved Precinct Plan including an examination of the key issues that
have been resolved and the main amendments made to the draft Plan. The report also advises of the status of the
draft Planning Agreement for the Dunheved Precinct. The report recommends support in principle
for the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan
with amendments as agreed by the proponent. The report also recommends the
public exhibition of the draft Planning Agreement and other procedural steps to
be taken.
Background
On 16 June 2003, Diane Beamer, who was then the Minister for
The LGA boundary between Penrith and Blacktown Council areas traverses the middle of the Dunheved Precinct. The draft Dunheved Precinct Plan was jointly lodged with Penrith City Council and Blacktown City Council on 30 April 2005. It is a consolidated plan that applies to both the North Dunheved Precinct and the South Dunheved Precinct.
The Dunheved Precinct has a total area of 30.3 ha, which technically comprises a North Dunheved Precinct (18.4 ha) within the jurisdiction of Blacktown City Council and a South Dunheved Precinct (11.9 ha) within the jurisdiction of Penrith City Council. A copy of the ADI Site Precinct Plan is attached as Appendix 1. The Dunheved Precinct Framework Plan is attached as Appendix 2.
Although the Minister has formally declared two separate precincts, DoP, Delfin Lend Lease and both Councils have agreed on the lodgement of a single Plan to be determined by resolutions from the two separate Council meetings.
A joint planning process was held with Blacktown Council regarding the exhibition process, submissions from public authorities and assessment of key issues. Officers from both Councils and Delfin Lend Lease have held a number of joint workshops which have resulted in the determination of an agreed set of standards for the two precincts on issues such as road reservations, building setbacks, building heights and subdivision layout.
The Employment Development Strategy (EDS) for the full ADI site was completed in June 2003 and endorsed by the Minister for Planning a few months ago. The Dunheved Precinct represents approximately half of the total land area zoned Employment within the site and is proposed to contribute 600 direct on-site jobs.
On 10 June 2005 Delfin Lend Lease submitted a draft Outline Development Agreement (draft ODA) which was very limited in scope and proposed a small park facilities and bicycle network.
At Council’s Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 27 June 2005, a presentation was provided to Councillors by Delfin Lend Lease on the Precinct Plan. Council considered a report recommending that it publicly exhibit the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan in accordance with the provisions of Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 30 – St Marys and concurrently with Blacktown City Council. Council resolved that:-
1. The
information contained in this report on the submission of the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan be received
2. Council publicly exhibit the draft
Dunheved Precinct Plan in accordance with the provisions
of Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 30 – St Marys, and concurrently with Blacktown City
Council
3. Landowners in the vicinity of the Dunheved
Precinct be advised of the exhibition details
and Council’s resolution
4. Penrith City Council continue discussions
with
5. A funding report be prepared on the
funding of the ongoing maintenance of the issues detailed in the submission attached to the report
6. Council pursue the development of the
Christie Street linkage in conjunction with Delfin
Lend Lease (DLL) and the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA), funding contributions from realization of surplus
Council/DLL/RTA land.
The submitted draft Outline Development Agreement (draft
ODA) was considered inadequate due to the absence in the draft ODA of
contributions for
Copies of the draft Precinct Plan as submitted to Council on 30 April 2005 were distributed to Councillors in September 2005 prior to the public exhibition process. A copy of the draft Plan incorporating a number of amendments negotiated with Delfin Lend Lease since that time has been recently distributed to Councillors.
Statutory planning requirements for adoption of draft
Dunheved Precinct Plan
Clause 15 of SREP 30 permits Council to adopt a draft Precinct Plan either -
(i) in the form in which it was publicly exhibited;
(ii) with amendments as agreed to by the proponent, or as proposed by the proponent in response to submissions; or
(iii) with amendments not agreed to by the proponent, but only with the consent of the Minister.
Council cannot refuse to
adopt a draft Precinct Plan unless it has obtained the agreement of the
Minister to the refusal. Although a
Council technically has 6 months in which to adopt a precinct plan, Delfin Lend
Lease and the two Councils agreed to extend the assessment period so that
additional work could be carried out by consultants and submitted to Council
for assessment.
Submission of revised
draft Outlined Development Agreement
Following further negotiations with Delfin Lend Lease, a revised draft ODA was subsequently submitted to both Councils which incorporates revised schedules for Transport, Open Space and Recreation and Drainage. The revised draft ODA included the following works:
Transport Study Works
·
·
·
Additional Works
· New
·
·
Open Space and
Recreation
· Open
Space Area associated with convenience and retail food outlets (paved, shaded
outdoor seating area approximately 100 -150 m2
);
· 5
m wide shared pedestrian and cycle path.
Drainage
· Combined
detention/infiltration basins
Exhibition of draft
Dunheved Precinct Plan and draft Outline Development Agreement
Following the submission of the revised draft ODA, Penrith and Blacktown Councils publicly exhibited the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and draft Outline Development Agreement for the required statutory period of 28 days from 7 September to 5 October 2005. Relevant exhibition material, including maps, the draft Plan and the draft ODA was displayed at the following venues:
Penrith City Council Foyer, Penrith Library, Penrith Council’s St Marys Office, St. Marys Library, Blacktown City Council and Mt Druitt Library.
The exhibition of the draft Plan was also advertised in
local newspapers covering relevant areas in Penrith and
Notification letters were sent to landowners in residential areas surrounding the North and South Dunheved Precincts. A comprehensive range of public authorities, Local Members, local community and business groups, including Dunheved Industrial Development Committee and ADIRAG, were notified in writing of the exhibition and invited to comment.
Assessment of
Submissions
Council has received a total of 30 submissions to the exhibition comprising a petition with 89 signatures, two individual letters, seven form letters and 20 submissions from Public Authorities, Service Authorities and Emergency Services organizations.
A summary of the submissions made and a brief assessment of those submissions is provided below. A detailed listing of the issues raised in submissions and a full assessment is provided in Attachment 1.
1. Individual submissions
Two individual
submissions have been received. Both
submissions object to the draft Plan.
The issues raised related to potential flooding and the biodiversity
assessment.
· The
filling of the floodplain will impede creek flows and result in upstream
flooding.
Comments:
The flood modelling carried out has
demonstrated that if all proposed ameliorative measures are implemented, there
will only be ‘minimal’ increases in flood level upstream of the site of 37mm
and downstream of the site of 11 mm.
Council staff are satisfied with the methodology undertaken in
determining the flood level and with the negligible affect that the filling of
this part of the flood plain would have.
This matter is addressed in more detail later in this report.
· The
Biodiversity Assessment Report is grossly inadequate. The site has a high representation
floristically of species for a remnant on the Cumberland Plain. The submission also opposes the filling of
the floodplain as it will potentially cause problems for the downstream
property owners.
Comments:
The biodiversity value of the Dunheved
Precinct needs to be viewed in the context of the wider biodiversity
conservation outcome for the whole of the ADI Site, including the preservation
of a substantial
2. Form letters and petition
Seven form letters
and a petition raising the same issues as the form letters and containing 89
signatures have been submitted. The
issues and our commentary is included in Attachment 1. A summary of the points raised is outlined
below.
· Object
to the development of the floodplain, seek the collection of new floodplain
data prior to the approval of the Precinct Plan and ask where is the equivalent
area of compensatory floodplain storage situated?
· Seeks information on number of truckloads
required to fill the site and opposes any increased traffic on
· Opposes Development Agreements and seeks assurance that Council can act in public interest;
· Opposes
any increased traffic on
Comments:
Council’s flood policy generally does not
support filling of the flood plain (1% AEP flood level) unless it can be
demonstrated that no detrimental effects will occur as a result of the filling
and any associated mitigation works. The proponent carried out a modeling
exercise that used the most contemporary flood model that was available (the
1991 Flood Study). The approach which was undertaken in the use of this
modeling, looked at the differences in the flood levels upstream, downstream
and across the site as a result of the proposed filling and mitigation
measures. The model that was used for this is considered to be adequate for
this exercise. The modeling was also scrutinized by Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) and subjected to a peer
review by an independent consultant. Both DNR and the consultant arrived at the
same conclusions and have endorsed the study outcomes. This approach is also consistent with State Government’s
Floodplain Management Manual .
Details relating to the
method of filling the land are more appropriately dealt with at the DA stage
once the sources of fill material are known.
A
Development Agreement, which is now known as a Planning Agreement, under the
new legislation, should not be confused with a Public Private Partnership
(PPP). A PPP is an altogether different
process where Government may elect to enter into a contract with a private
organisation for the carrying out of works in return for that organization
receiving a share of the revenue so generated, such as a tollway. A Planning Agreement is a contractual
agreement between the planning authority and the developer. On 8 July 2005, the Environmental Planning
& Assessment Act, 1979 (EP&A Act), was amended to allow planning authorities
to use planning agreements as a means to obtain contributions for a public
purpose. The purpose of a Planning
Agreement is to ensure that developers put in place infrastructure in a timely
manner using a process that is more suitable or flexible than the traditional
Section 94 process. The signing of a
Planning Agreement by a Council does not bind or fetter that Council in the
carrying out of its statutory planning obligations under the EP& A Act.
3.Public
Authorities
A total of 20 submissions have been received
from public authorities, which are listed in Attachment 1.
Although no public authorities objected to
the draft Plan, a total of 5 public authorities have raised issues that need to
be addressed. These authorities are DNR,
DoP (Metro Planning & Transport Strategy), MoT, Sydney Water and the RTA.
(i) DNR
The draft Plan has been amended to meet
various minor changes requested by DNR.
Key issues resolved include the use of a 20m wide riparian corridor in
lieu of a proposed 20m wide drainage and use of combined water quality basins
rather than detention/infiltration basins.
(ii) Department of Planning (DoP)
A number of issues raised by DoP have been
resolved including phasing of development, flood evacuation, journey to work
modal split, retention of trees and impact of development upon flood
levels. DoP also sought more detail on
future bus services and the form and management of public transport promotion,
including timeframes for implementation of public transport improvements. These are valid queries, however the
responsibility for the location of bus routes, frequency of service and
provision of public transport improvements rests with the Ministry of Transport
(MoT). This issue is further discussed
in the following item.
(iii) Ministry of Transport (MoT)
The approach being pursued by the MoT in
relation to bus services is based on the 43 Strategic Bus Corridors nominated
in the Unsworth Report. MoT have
indicated that they are not yet in a position to engage Council in a detailed
bus services review given priorities being pursued elsewhere in Sydney. The key issues raised by the MoT included:
· Bus priority access should be provided into
the adjacent residential subdivisions and to rail connections at St Marys and
Penrith. Objects to the piecemeal approach to the development of this site;
· Bus connectivity should be provided from
Dunheved Precinct to the adjacent industrial subdivisions;
· The design of the bus network for the site
should integrate with the strategic bus corridor – a central spine route
through AD I site is favoured;
· Unless funds are provided for start-up bus
services, it is difficult to see how the stated reduction in vehicle kilometers
travelled (VKT) could be achieved;
Comments:
The
St Marys Development Agreement (The Deed) and the 2005 Transport Management
Study (2005 TMS) (currently being updated) provide the planning and legal
framework for the provision of the scheduled regional and local road and
intersection upgrades. A series of
public transport improvements will be carried out following the finalisation of
the 2005 TMS. The Deed does provide for public transport promotion and for the
subsidization for the cost of an interim bus service. Although the ADI site is currently being
developed in a staged fashion, transport planning for the site is being
delivered on a whole of site basis. The
future declaration of additional precincts by the Minister will assist in the
delivery of an integrated approach to provision of bus services across the ADI
site. It is considered that the draft
Dunheved Precinct Plan demonstrates good bus connectivity, recognizing that the
internal road connectors that will ultimately link Dunheved Precinct to the
Western, Central and Eastern Precincts are yet to be planned in detail and
delivered. Council should strongly
support the use of available funds within the Deed for transport promotion.
(iv) Sydney Water
Issues raised:
· Sydney Water
requests that both flushing of toilets and all irrigation needs be met from use
of recycled effluent. They have also
requested that use of recycled effluent for industrial operations be actively
pursued.
· Sydney Water
argues that recycled effluent should be used at all times for both flushing of
toilets and irrigation use. It is argued
that the use for toilets only would have implications for pipe size, costs and
system design and would lead to a deterioration in water quality when recycled
water is held in pipes for long periods.
Comments:
Delfin Lend Lease argues that use of recycled effluent at all times for
irrigation could potentially generate higher salinity levels and consider that
they should not be forced to use recycled effluent when rainwater is available
in tanks. It is considered that, where
available, rainwater should be utilized for irrigation in order to reduce
salinity, reduce costs and for sustainability reasons. Delfin Lend Lease was asked to negotiate the
delivery of a recycled effluent scheme for the Dunheved Precinct, given that it
is advancing the installation of the infrastructure required to reticulate
recycled effluent to the Eastern (Ropes Crossing) Precinct. In our view, the use of recycled effluent
should be pursued for the Dunheved Precinct, particularly given the St Marys
STP location adjoining the site. In
discussion with
(i)
the developer to provide all allotments with a separate piped supply of treated
effluent from the St Marys STP, subject to continuing negotiations with Sydney
Water, and other appropriate measures such as rainwater tanks;
(ii) developments that consume high volumes
of water in their operation shall incorporate recycling initiatives in the
plant’s operation.
(v) RTA
Issues raised:
· The RTA considers that the following works will be required to meet the demands of this development;
·
·
·
RTA suggest that consideration
be given to the provision of Traffic Control Signal (TCS) at the intersections
of Forrester Road/Christie Street/Boronia Road and Forrester Road/Links Road
instead of the proposed short term intersection treatments. The replacement of
the roundabouts with the TCS is required by 2012 as part of the proposed strategic
bus corridors work along
· The
latest proposal of the creation of a four-way intersection at
· Regarding Council’s request for the dedication of part of the RTA owned land related to establishing the new Link Road to Christie Street, the RTA has not been able to consider the request in the absence of detailed information regarding the extent of land needed and the specific purpose it is required for.
Comments:
Council agrees with the RTA’s suggestions for
road improvements to
Assessment of
draft Precinct Plan
The draft Dunheved
Precinct Plan consists of two volumes containing the following documents:
· Volume
1 comprising draft Precinct Plan and draft Development Control Strategy; and
· Volume 2
comprising the following supplementary reports:
· Employment Implementation Strategy
· Water Soils & Infrastructure Report
· Biodiversity Assessment Report
· Tree Survey
· Weed Management Plan
· Bushfire Management Plan
· Feral & Domestic Animal Strategy
· Traffic and Transport Report
· Contamination Management Plan
· Human Services and Community Facilities Report
· European Heritage Report
· Aboriginal Archaeology Report
· Landscape and Open Space Masterplan
· Landscape and Open Space Handover & Maintenance Plan
The draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and draft Development Control Strategy has been assessed under an existing statutory planning framework comprising the following key documents:
· Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 30 (SREP 30);
· The St Marys Environmental Planning Strategy (EPS);
· The St Marys Development Agreement (The Deed).
The draft Plan and draft Development Control Strategy has included the required matters listed under SREP30. The draft Plan is also considered to have met the required performance objectives listed in the Environmental Planning Strategy (EPS).
Clause 11 of SREP 30 provides amongst other things, that a Precinct Plan must not be approved unless Council is satisfied that the Plan is consistent with the performance objectives, zone objectives and requirements prescribed by the SREP and the proposed development controls proposed in the St. Marys Environmental Planning Strategy 2000 (EPS 2000). Council must also ensure that the Precinct Plan is substantially in accordance with the Structure Plan under SREP 30.
The draft Precinct Plan and draft Development Control Strategy together address the full range of issues required under the above provisions of SREP 30. The draft Plan is also consistent with the Structure Plan under SREP 30.
Assessment of Key Issues
A number of issues have emerged from both
consideration of the submissions raised during the public exhibition as well as
from our own assessment and the discussions we have held with officers of
Blacktown Council. The key matters are
outlined below together with relevant commentary. It will be noted that in a number of
instances, we have reached agreement with Delfin Lend Lease to amend the draft
Precinct Plan. A detailed list of these
amendments are provided at Attachment 2 to this report.
The following section also includes commentary
on a number of queries raised by Councillors at the presentation provided on
the Dunheved Precinct Plan at the Policy Review Committee meeting 27 June 2005.
A copy of the Draft Dunheved Precinct Plan
with the amendments outlined below, as agreed by Delfin Lend Lease and
Blacktown Council, has been separately distributed to Councillors. However, a number of the Management Plans and
Strategies, which are the supporting documents for the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan, are currently still being revised by Delfin
Lend Lease. The details of these amendments are outlined in Attachment 4.
1.
Filling of Land and Flood Management
The
Dunheved Precinct is floodprone and requires filling of land to a depth of
1.0-1.5m. It is acknowledged that the
extent of fill proposed on the Dunheved Precinct is significantly less than the
volumes that would be required for the Central Precinct, if that precinct were
to be declared as a release area by the Minister. As a result, the proponent
was requested to model filling of the Dunheved Precinct as well as the Central
Precinct to determine the net affects on the floodplain. The relevant performance standard within SREP
30 states that “there is to be only minimal
impact upon flood levels upstream or downstream of the land to which this plan
applies as a consequence of its development.”
At
the request of the two Councils, a Peer Review was carried out by Bewsher
Consulting “to study and access the technical veracity of
the modelling undertaken by SKM.”
The two Councils chose Bewshers as this organization is considered to be
well equipped to access the modelling methodology employed. Bewshers concluded that “the methodology used by SKM to model the proposed fill areas and flood
storage areas within the site follows normal and accepted modelling
practice. There is documentation
available to substantiate much of the methodology and results. We have not found any information which
raises significant concerns about the modelling work undertaken by SKM.” This outcome has also been endorsed by the
Department of Natural Resources.
The flood modelling consultants SKM were also asked by the two Councils to provide additional information on flood impact. The work carried out has provided the following results:
· When pre and post development conditions for the South Creek floodplain are compared for 1:100 year flood on large scale maps the maximum vertical increment in flood level upstream of the site is 37 mm (golf course only) and downstream is 11 mm;
· There are no discernable horizontal impacts on the 1:100 year flood extent due to the proposed development;
· Alternative modelling scenarios based on a reduced development have delivered no significant reduction in flood levels.
This additional work has further demonstrated the original modelling results that minimal increases in flood level can be expected to occur as a result of the proposed development.
.
Council, in the implementation of its flood policy, has not favoured substantial filling of flood plains. In cases where small scale filling of flood liable areas has been agreed to, Council has insisted upon compensatory flood storage being provided. Council’s “Interim Policy for Development of Flood Liable Land” employs a “merits based” approach for assessment.
At
Council’s request, the applicant has provided clarification on the rationale of
their flood modelling approach. Given
the proximity of the
The submitted information from SKM indicates that minimal increases to both upstream and downstream flood levels will be achieved by the development of the Dunheved Precinct if certain flood mitigation measures are implemented. This approach is to raise the level of two bridges which span both Ropes and South Creeks and to remove the approach embankment for the old munitions bridge in order to increase the cross-sectional channel volume for Ropes and South Creeks. This allows the required performance standards in SREP 30 and the EPS to be met.
The means of importing the fill material, including ensuring that the source of fill for the Dunheved Precinct is free from any form of contamination and is validated as safe for filling purposes are detailed matters that will be canvassed in subsequent development applications.
We are satisfied that the issues raised in the 27 June 2005 report to Council concerning the flooding implications of filling the Dunheved Precinct have been satisfactorily addressed.
2.
Biodiversity
The majority of the Dunheved Precinct has
been cleared however areas of vegetation remain in the north, southwest and
southeast of the site.
The
development of the Dunheved Precinct will result in the removal of areas of
three endangered ecological communities, two threatened flora species and a
number of Blue Box trees that are regionally significant. The retention of significant trees will be possible within
the riparian and drainage corridors in the southwest of the site, however the
proposal for filling of the site to a depth of 1.0-1.5 m will generally prevent
the retention of existing vegetation within the precinct.
The proponents have undertaken a
comprehensive 8 Part Test for the endangered and threatened species consistent
with the provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, which
indicates that the loss of the vegetation is not of significant impact. DEC has indicated in its submission that
provided that plantings and weed management policies within the Dunheved
Precinct are sympathetic to the management of the biodiversity within the
Despite the loss of vegetation (approx 3 ha)
on the Dunheved Precinct, it is reasonable to conclude that this is more than
balanced by the protection of significant areas (900 ha) of endangered woodland
within the adjoining
3.
Riparian Corridor
Following the request of DNR, Delfin Lend Lease has agreed to Council’s request to replace the proposed 20m wide drainage corridor in the upper reaches of the creek in the south-west of the site with a 20m wide riparian corridor. DNR has also requested that there be no development lots backing onto any riparian corridor and Delfin Lend Lease has agreed that, where practical, perimeter road or track will be provided adjacent to any riparian or drainage corridor within the precinct.
4.
Drainage Basins
DNR raised concerns that the concept of using infiltration basins to treat water quality may have implications for salinity on the site. Delfin Lend Lease, in reconsidering this aspect, has agreed to replace the infiltration basins with combined detention and water quality basins.
5.
Bioretention Swales
Bioretention swales convey and filter stormwater run-off through the use of vegetation as a filter medium. Delfin Lend Lease originally proposed to locate bioretention swales along both sides of all roads within the precinct as an integral part of the stormwater quality management and trunk drainage system. We have however, expressed concern in this application at the ongoing costs to Council of maintaining such infrastructure and queried the practicality of locating swales in an industrial area which is subject to heavy traffic movements. We requested that bioretention swales be limited to the western side of the main collector road only. Delfin Lend Lease has accordingly amended the draft Precinct Plan.
6.
Recreation Space for Employees
At the request of both Councils, the two proposed Local Parks have been removed from the original draft Dunheved Precinct Plan as it was considered to be a maintenance liability and unlikely to be regularly used, given its location in an industrial area.
As an alternative, the draft Planning Agreement which has recently been submitted to Council includes as a proposed scope of works a paved, shaded outdoor eating area, approximately 100-150 square metres, incorporating seating, shade structures and tree planting. This is proposed to be established prior to 75% of industrial establishments being established within the North and South Dunheved Precincts. Delfin Lend Lease will also use reasonable endeavours to ensure that a convenience and retail foods outlet is established in either of the Dunheved Precincts.
The
draft Precinct Plan also requires that a passive recreation area be provided on
each allotment for use by employees.
7. Public
Transport Infrastructure
The
draft Precinct Plan has been amended to include two bus stops and two bus
shelters at both the northern and southern ends of the main
8.
Road Network Infrastructure
Officers from both Councils devised a consistent set of standards for
both road carriageway widths and road reservation widths for both the main
9. Use of Recycled Water
In
its submission to Council, Sydney Water requests that both flushing of toilets
and all irrigation needs be met at all times from the use of recycled effluent,
rather than from a combination of recycled effluent and stored water from
rainwater tanks. It is argued that the
use of recycled effluent for toilets only would have implications for pipe
size, costs and system design and would
lead to a deterioration in water quality when recycled water is held in pipes
for long periods. They have also
requested that the use of recycled effluent for industrial operations be
actively pursued.
Delfin
Lend Lease argues that use of recycled effluent at all times for irrigation
could potentially generate higher salinity levels and consider that they should
not be forced to use recycled effluent when rainwater is available in
tanks. It is considered that, where
available, rainwater should be utilized for irrigation in order to reduce
salinity, reduce costs and for sustainability reasons. Delfin Lend Lease was asked to negotiate the
matter with Sydney Water and have commenced discussions with that authority.
The
two Councils and Delfin Lend Lease have agreed to amend the draft Plan to
include development controls to require:
(i) the developer to provide all allotments with a separate piped supply
of treated effluent from the St Marys STP, subject to continuing negotiations
with Sydney Water, and other appropriate measures such as rainwater tanks; (ii)
developments that consume high volumes of water in their operation shall
incorporate recycling initiatives in the plant’s operation.
10. Telecommunications Infrastructure
Council’s ‘Sustainability Blueprint for Urban Release Areas’
encourages the provision of ‘advanced
telecommunication infrastructure in new release areas which should provide
multiple telecom services including high speed internet (including broadband),
voice and data systems.’
Although Council cannot enforce the signing of commercial contracts by
developers, we are nevertheless keen to ensure that modern telecommunication infrastructure
and services are provided to the Dunheved Precincts. The draft Precinct Plan has therefore been
amended to require the provision of modern telecommunication infrastructure and
services subject to continuing negotiations with service providers.
11.
Subdivision and Built Form Controls
In our assessment of the proposed development controls contained within the Precinct Plan, we have discussed a number of appropriate changes with Blacktown Council officers to ensure that both Councils’ existing controls for employment precincts can be consistently meshed into the requirements for Dunheved Precinct. The key amendments made to Part 4 of the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan (draft Development Control Strategy) are summarized below.
· Minimum
The
minimum lot width at the primary street frontage has been increased to 50m on
the
· Salinity Controls
Specific salinity objectives and controls have been added to the draft Plan in order to manage and mitigate the impacts of, and on, salinity.
·
A
specific control has been inserted into the draft Plan in order to ensure that
loading docks, loading areas and external storage areas shall be appropriately
located and/or screened so as to not be visible from the
· Front Setback Controls
The
draft Plan has been amended to reflect increased front building line
setbacks. The front setback for the
A specific control has been added to the draft Plan to prevent the location of water tanks within the front setback and to require screening. Minimum landscape requirements for front setback areas have also been added.
· Carparking
The
draft Plan has been amended to specifically require carparking to be located
behind the required minimum front landscaped setback area. The draft Plan has also been amended to
remove the specific controls that previously permitted carparking to be shared
between neighbouring lots and which also permitted shared access and turning
areas between neighbouring sites. These
two latter controls have been deleted as officers considered that they would
create on-site problems.
· Employee Recreation Area
A requirement for a minimum passive recreation area on each lot for use by employees has been added to the draft Plan.
· Maximum
Fence Height
The draft Plan has included a maximum fence height of 1.8m in order to screen the rear of the lots from adjacent sites.
· Specific Urban Design Controls
Specific Controls relating to building design and building materials have been added to strengthen the draft Plan.
12.
Ongoing Maintenance of Drainage, Riparian Corridors, Roads and Asset
Protection Zone
At Council’s Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 27 June 2005, Council resolved, in part, that a report be prepared on the funding that may be required for the ongoing maintenance of drainage basins, riparian corridors, bioretention swales and the Asset Protection Zone.
Following
discussions with officers from both Councils, Delfin Lend Lease has agreed to
the removal of the proposed Local Parks in both North and South Dunheved
Precincts. Penrith Council officers and
Delfin Lend Lease have reached agreement that the bioretention swales should be
retained on the western side of the
Delfin Lend Lease submitted a “Landscape and Open Space Handover & Maintenance Plan” with the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan. This Plan outlines an 8 stage process which includes separate phases for approval, construction, practical completion, contract maintenance, handover and ongoing maintenance by Council.
It
is also proposed that a ‘Landscape and
Urban Design Strategy’ be
prepared as a supporting document to the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan, should
it be adopted. This strategy will
include, amongst other things, relationship to the site open space hierarchy,
standards for public domain character and presentation, design and materials
treatments and principles for landscape implementation and maintenance.
Officers have carried out an investigation of the likely ongoing maintenance costs to Council of these assets and have requested that a Maintenance Management Plan and schedule of estimates of costings be submitted to Council. This is currently being prepared by Delfin Lend Lease.
We
have requested that the pre-handover periods for drainage basins, riparian
corridors and bioretention swales be set at 3 years and the pre-handover times
for bushland and woodland be set at 12 months instead of 6 months. Delfin Lend Lease as agreed to those
arrangements.
13.
Contamination Management Plan
The ADI site has been the subject of
extensive investigation and remediation through the 1990’s. The work was undertaken with the full
involvement of the EPA and subsequently by an independent NSW EPA accredited
Site Auditor who produced and issued the Site Audit Statements for the whole of
the ADI site (Stage 2 Decontamination Audit of ADI St Marys Munitions Factory,
dated 7 June 1999). The site has been remediated to a level where it is
considered to pose a negligible risk to the public or the environment with
regard to chemical contamination or explosive ordnance.
The submitted ‘Contamination
Management Plan’ presents information
from the remediation and validation reports for the Southern Sector East (which
covers the Dunheved Precinct) and other pertinent information from the whole of
the site. The objective of the Plan is to provide a framework for identifying
and addressing any unexpected discovery of chemical contamination or
potentially explosive ordnance and to ensure a safe working environment.
Deed
of Indemnity
Council has been attempting to obtain a signed Deed of Indemnity for the former ADI site from the Commonwealth Government since May 2004. The intention of the Deed is to seek the Commonwealth Government to indemnify Council against all actions, claims and damages arising from any claim by the future land owners of the ADI Site from any currently unforeseen source of contamination.
Notwithstanding that Blacktown City Council received a signed Deed of Indemnity from the Commonwealth Government in the late 1990s, the Commonwealth Government has advised that it cannot now provide an indemnity out of a purported obligation arising from a similar indemnity provided to Blacktown City Council. We have been advised that Council has no legal entitlement to an indemnity from the Commonwealth Government.
We have sought from Council’s solicitors, Phillips Fox, advice whether Council has an argument that the Commonwealth Government should execute the draft Deed of Indemnity. We are advised that the Commonwealth Government has implemented a policy which states that a set of guidelines should be satisfied before the Commonwealth provides an indemnity. In August 2005, Council wrote to the Commonwealth Department of Finance and Administration and addressed the specific criteria listed in the guidelines provided by the Commonwealth Government.
The Commonwealth Government advised that the Council’s submissions have not identified any clear risk to Council, or basis for the Commonwealth to issue an indemnity. The Commonwealth Government has advised that it is of the view that the draft indemnity provides no further protection to Council than that afforded by section 145B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (EP&A) Act. This Section provides that if the Council acts in good faith with respect to issues of contamination in planning for future development of the area, that the Council will not be liable to any party at law.
Council’s solicitor has advised that it would appear that the Commonwealth Government accepts that the land is contaminated, but asserts that the question as to whether the Commonwealth should take responsibility for that contamination depends upon the Council identifying a particular risk to it, in relation to which it is not afforded protection under Section 145B of the EP&A Act.
Council’s solicitors have advised that the draft indemnity is of limited scope and operation and consider that there are very few circumstances where the draft indemnity would act in favour of the Council. The solicitors have advised that the draft indemnity would not apply to the Council where the good faith defence is available under section 145B of the EP&A Act.
Notwithstanding that the Commonwealth Government has so far refused to sign the Deed of Indemnity, our solicitors advise that a considerable degree of protection is available to Council under section 145B of the EP&A Act and it is reasonably considered that this should not otherwise prevent Council from adopting the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan.
Draft Planning Agreement
The gazettal on 8 July 2005 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Development Contributions) Regulation 2005 has extended the means by which planning authorities may obtain development contributions to be applied for the provision of public amenities and services and for other purposes. Local government now has the capacity to negotiate with developers in order to seek the provision of contributions towards facilities and services within Planning Agreements. This level of legal certainty was not previously available to Councils when negotiating developer agreements.
A draft Outline Development Agreement was lodged with Council in August 2005. However, based on the legal advice we have received, we have considered that the Councils should utilize the new Planning Agreement legislation as the appropriate legal mechanism for the delivery of contributions and services for the Dunheved Precinct.
Council
has been specifically requested by Delfin Lend Lease to permit a draft Planning
Agreement to be created under Part 3 of the St. Marys Development Agreement
that it has entered into with the State Government. Council’s solicitors have provided legal
opinion to Council on this matter and have indicated that there would be no
disadvantage to Council in following this approach.
A draft St Marys Penrith Planning Agreement has been prepared by the proponent and was submitted to Council in April 2006 following extensive negotiations with Delfin Lend Lease. This draft Planning Agreement supersedes the former draft Outline Development Agreement that was formerly exhibited alongside the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan. A copy of the submitted Schedules to the draft Planning Agreement, as currently amended, appears as Attachment 3.
Council officers and Delfin Lend Lease have negotiated a revised Schedule of Works, the notional value of those works and their timing. In our view, the proposed works now reflects an appropriate level of infrastructure delivery to effectively support the development of the Dunheved Precinct. The summary of the proposed works is as follows:
Schedule 1 – Local Transport Works
(i)
Transport Management Study Works
·
· Forrester Road & Links Road intersection;
· Forrester Road & Christie Street intersection;
· Werrington Road & Dunheved Road intersection;
·
(ii)
Accelerated Transport Management
Works
·
· Werrington Road & Dunheved Road intersection;
·
(iii) Additional Joint Venture Funded Transport
Works
· New Road Connection –
·
·
· New Footpath along
· Plan Administration
Charge for Planning Agreement.
Schedule
2 – Local Open Space Works
· Open space area associated with convenience & retail food outlets;
· Convenience & retail food outlet;
· Bicycle Path.
Schedule 3 – Stormwater
Drainage Infrastructure
· Combined water quality basins
Given the expanded content of the negotiated infrastructure now agreed to be delivered, it is considered that Council can endorse the proposed works schedules for inclusion into the draft Planning Agreement. If Council is of a mind to agree to the proposed works, once a response has been received from our solicitors and any necessary amendments made to the provisions within the Agreement, it would then be appropriate for the draft Planning Agreement to proceed to public exhibition. It would be appropriate for Council’s Legal Officer and Environmental Planning Manager to be given delegated authority for finalizing the Planning Agreement for public exhibition.
It is relevant to note that once Council
adopts a Precinct Plan, development proposals can be submitted to Council, with
the expectation that they will be determined. The legal advice received from
Council’s solicitors has recommended that the draft Planning Agreement be
finalised, publicly exhibited and duly executed prior to formal adoption by
Council of the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan and supporting documentation. This
will ensure there is a clear infrastructure delivery mechanism endorsed by
Council before Development Applications are required to be determined.
Proposed
Council in its last consideration of the Dunheved
Precinct Plan urged that further discussions be held with Delfin Lend Lease and
the RTA concerning the most appropriate means to achieve a new link road
between the existing Dunheved Estate and
Delfin Lend Lease has submitted to Council a draft
Concept Plan for a link road between the
The proposal which we see value in moving forward
would consider the future development opportunities for in the order of 20
hectares of currently undeveloped land, held in private and public ownership,
in the vicinity of
· Freeing up existing industrial zoned land for economic development;
· Providing a source of funding the proposed link road construction;
· Creating new jobs in addition to those which will emerge in the new Dunheved Precinct on the ADI site;
· Providing a means to enhance the visual appearance and address of the existing Dunheved Industrial Estate and its presentation to the future Werrington Arterial;
· Providing a catalyst for development renewal in the adjoining industrial areas.
The
RTA in discussions has indicated support in principle for the proposed
Given
that taking the approach outlined above will take some time to advance, we have
discussed with Delfin Lend Lease the most appropriate mechanism for moving
forward to determine the final design, cost, funding arrangements and delivery
mechanism for the
The
Heads of Agreement is intended to establish a framework for the
development of the land and the further assessment, design, approval, funding
and construction of the
In
our view, this is an appropriate course of action particularly and would
effectively delineate responsibilities for a joint approach to delivering the
Management Plans and Strategies
A series of Management Plans and Strategies
has been prepared to sit alongside the draft Precinct Plan and draft
Development Control Strategy to provide more detailed information and
guidelines concerning specific management responses that will be required over
time to support the development. Those
are outlined in the earlier section titled ‘Assessment of Draft Precinct
Plan’.
In discussions with Delfin Lend Lease and
Blacktown Council, a number of mostly minor amendments have been agreed to
advance to the supporting documents, and are outlined in Attachment 4. These however are yet to be completed.
Council’s
solicitors, Phillips Fox, have advised that given there are a number of Management Plans and Strategies which
form part of the draft Dunheved
Precinct Plan and which are yet to be amended by Delfin Lend Lease, it is not considered prudent for Council to
formally adopt the draft
Dunheved Precinct Plan at this stage.
Council could however, based on the level of agreement reached with
Delfin Lend Lease and the amendments now made to the draft Precinct Plan, give
consideration to endorsing the draft Precinct Plan in principle, and with a
formal approval being subject to the satisfactory execution of the Planning
Agreement and the receipt of all necessary amended documents.
Conclusion
The Dunheved Precinct will
make a notable contribution to delivering new employment opportunities, not
only in relation to the ADI Site development, but also in relation to Council’s
aspirations to creating new jobs across the City. It also represents the first phase of
implementation of the ADI Employment Strategy within Penrith, which is the
vehicle to ensure that Council’s policy of creating new jobs in association
with this new urban release area development materialises.
The public submissions made to
the exhibition of the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan have been carefully assessed
and it is considered that the issues raised have been effectively dealt with in
relation to the proposals advanced by Delfin Lend Lease and the amendments made
to the draft Precinct Plan.
The submissions received from the State Government authorities have been appropriately addressed and the relevant aspects identified in the report incorporated in the amended draft Precinct Plan. As indicated in the report, issues raised concerning the early provision of bus services will require further addressment by the MoT and it is recommended that we write to that agency to seek their advice as to the appropriate timing for this consideration to occur.
Engineering consultants
carried out a detailed flood modelling exercise, and a separate engineering
consultant also conducted a peer review process. In our view, the studies carried out
demonstrate that the proposed development will have minimal impact on flood
levels.
In relation to the funding of
management arrangements previously raised by Council, Delfin Lend Lease has
agreed to pre-handover periods of 3 years for drainage basins and increased
pre-handover periods of 3 years for riparian corridors and bioretention swales
for this site. Delfin Lend Lease has
also agreed to increase the proposed contract maintenance period for bushland
and woodland from 6-12 months. In our
view, this is an appropriate outcome.
Despite our endeavours to
obtain a signed Deed of Indemnity from the Commonwealth Government in relation
to the past contamination of parts of the ADI site, Council’s solicitors have
advised that the draft Indemnity is of limited scope and may not provide for
any substantial protection in addition to that now provided by the changes to
the Environmental Planning and Assessment legislation. Both Council’s solicitors and the Legal
Officer have advised that it is reasonable to consider Council should not be
prevented from adopting the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan in the absence of obtaining
the Indemnity.
Extensive negotiations have
been held with Delfin Lend Lease to arrive at an agreed schedule of
infrastructure works required to support the development of the Dunheved
Precinct. Those works include measures
which would be immediately required as a result of development occurring in
this Precinct, as well as the implications created from Blacktown Council
endorsing the development of the Eastern (Ropes Crossing) Precinct. In addition, Delfin Lend Lease has agreed to
accelerate a number of road works that would be more relevant to support the
development of the Western and Central Precincts yet to be released, but for
which there is advantage in bringing forward in order to support the
development of the Dunheved Precinct. Accordingly, it is recommended that
Council endorse the works schedules attached to the report as the basis of the
draft Planning Agreement to be publicly exhibited in accordance with the
provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.
In relation to advancing the
establishment of a new Link Road between the existing Dunheved Industrial
Estate and Christie Street, a mechanism to move forward has been negotiated
with Delfin Lend Lease and it is recommended that Council enter into a suitable
Heads of Agreement to provide the means for a collaborative approach to be
pursued to the design and delivery of the new Link Road.
Given the current status of
the advancement of the proposed Planning Agreement and the need to have
revisions of all documents supporting the draft Precinct Plan finalised, it is
not considered appropriate for Council to formally adopt the Precinct Plan at
this stage. However, in order to provide some clarity for the proponent so that
they may commence consideration of the next development phase for the Dunheved
Precinct, it is relevant for Council to indicate that it is fundamentally
satisfied with the outcomes reached to-date. Accordingly, it is recommended
Council provide in principle support for the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan.
A further report will be
presented to Council following the exhibition of the draft Planning Agreement
and receipt of the revised draft Precinct Plan and supporting documentation.
This would allow consideration by Council of the formal adoption of the
Dunheved Precinct Plan and the related Planning Agreement to be executed
concurrently.
That: 1. The
information contained in the report on ADI Site - Draft Dunheved Precinct Plan & Draft Planning Agreement
be received. 2. Council endorse in principle the draft Dunheved Precinct Plan submitted by Delfin Lend Lease, with the amendments as agreed to by the proponent outlined in the report and in the attachments. 3. A further report be presented to Council following the exhibition of the draft Planning Agreement and receipt of the revised draft Precinct Plan and supporting documentation for consideration of the formal adoption of the two documents. 4. Council endorse the proposed works schedules included in the Attachments to this report for their inclusion in the draft Planning Agreement. 5. Council publicly exhibit the draft Planning Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979 and Regulations and authorise the Legal Officer and Environmental Planning Manager to finalise the content of the draft Planning Agreement prior to the formal public exhibition process. 6. Council enter into a Heads of Agreement
with Delfin Lend Lease regarding the advancement of the proposed 7. Council write to the Ministry of
Transport to confirm the appropriate approach and timing for the delivery of
bus services in the Dunheved
Precinct and the 8. Delfin Lend Lease be advised of Council’s decision. |
ADI
Precinct Map |
1
Page |
Appendix |
|
Dunheved
Precinct Framework Plan |
1
Page |
Appendix |
|
Assessment
of Submissions |
7
Pages |
Attachment |
|
Key
Amendments to Draft Dunheved Precinct Plan |
2
Pages |
Attachment |
|
Schedules
for Draft Planning Agreement |
4
Pages |
Attachment |
|
Amendments
to Management Plans and Strategies |
3
Pages |
Attachment |
Attachment 1
Assessment of Submissions – ADI Dunheved Precinct Plan
Council has received a total of 30 submissions to the exhibition comprising a petition with 89 signatures, two individual letters, seven form letters and 20 submissions from Public Authorities, Service Authorities and Emergency Services organizations.
Individual submissions
Two individual submissions have been received. Both submissions object to the draft Plan.
Issues
raised – Submission 1:-
· The filling of land will present a threat to upstream localities. South Creek and Ropes Creek have always flowed through the site unimpeded. The filling of the floodplain will impede the flow and the result will be massive upstream flooding.
Comments:-
· Flood modelling has been carried out
to investigate the impact of filling of part of the floodplain and to determine
what flood mitigation measures should be introduced to ensure that the proposed
development only results in ‘minimal’ flood impact. The flood modelling has demonstrated that if
all proposed ameliorative measures are implemented, there will only be
‘minimal’ increases in flood level upstream of the site of 37mm and downstream
of the site 11 mm. Council staff are
satisfied with these results. This
matter will be assessed in more detail later in this report.
Issues
raised – Submission 2:-
· The Biodiversity Assessment Report is grossly inadequate. The site has a high representation floristically of species for a remnant on the Cumberland Plain.