29 August 2007
Dear Councillor,
In pursuance of the provisions of the Local
Government Act, 1993 and the Regulations thereunder, notice is hereby given
that an ORDINARY MEETING of Penrith
City Council is to be held in the Council Chambers, Civic Centre,
Attention is directed to the statement
accompanying this notice of the business proposed to be transacted at the
meeting.
Yours Faithfully
Barry Husking
Acting General Manager
BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
2. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Ordinary Meeting
- 13 August 2007.
4. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Pecuniary Interest (The
Act requires Councillors who declare a pecuniary interest in an item to leave
the meeting during discussion of that item)
Non-Pecuniary Interest
5. ADDRESSING THE MEETING
6. MAYORAL MINUTES
7. NOTICES OF MOTION
8. ADOPTION OF REPORTS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEES
Policy Review
Committee Meeting - 20 August 2007.
9. MASTER PROGRAM REPORTS
10. URGENT REPORTS (to
be dealt with in the master program to which the item relates)
11. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
12. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Monday 3 September 2007
table of contents
seating arrangements
meeting calendar
confirmation of minutes
report and recommendations of committees
master program reports
Statement of Recognition of
Aboriginal
and
Cultural Heritage
Council values the unique
status of Aboriginal people as the original owners and custodians of lands and
waters, including the land and waters of
Council values the unique
status of Torres Strait Islander people as the original owners and custodians
of the
We work together for a
united
PRAYER
“Sovereign
God, tonight as we gather together as a Council we affirm that you are the
giver and sustainer of life. We come
together as representatives of our community to make decisions that will
benefit this city and the people within it.
We
come not in a spirit of competition, not as adversaries, but as
colleagues. Help us to treat each other
with respect, with dignity, with interest and with honesty. Help us not just to hear the words we say,
but also to hear each others hearts. We
seek to be wise in all that we say and do.
As
we meet, our concern is for this city.
Grant us wisdom, courage and strength.
Lord,
help us. We pray this in the name of
Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.”
Council Chambers Seating Arrangements
Managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEETING CALENDAR
February 2007 - December 2007
|
TIME |
FEB |
MAR |
APRIL |
MAY |
JUNE |
JULY |
AUG |
SEPT |
OCT |
NOV |
DEC |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
||
Ordinary Meetings |
7.30 pm |
12 |
5 |
|
7v |
25* |
2 |
|
3ü |
15 |
5 |
3 |
|
26 |
23 |
28 |
|
23 |
13 |
24^ |
|
|
17 |
||
Policy Review Committee |
7.30 pm |
|
12 |
2@ |
|
4 |
9 |
|
10 |
8 |
19# |
10 |
19#+ |
|
30 |
21# |
|
30 |
20#+ |
|
29@ |
|
|
# Meetings at
which the Management Plan ¼ly reviews
are presented. |
^ Election
of Mayor/Deputy Mayor [only business] |
#+ General
Manager’s presentation – half year and end of year review |
@ Strategic
Program progress reports [only business] |
v Meeting
at which the Draft Management Plan is adopted for exhibition |
ü Meeting
at which the 2006/2007 Annual Statements are presented |
* Meeting at which the Management Plan for
2007/2008 is adopted |
|
-
Council’s
Ordinary Meetings are held on a three-week cycle where practicable.
-
Extraordinary
Meetings are held as required.
-
Policy
Review Meetings are held on a three-week cycle where practicable.
-
Members
of the public are invited to observe meetings of the Council (Ordinary and
Policy Review Committee). All meetings
start at 7:30pm.
-
Should
you wish to address Council, please contact the Public Officer, Glenn McCarthy
on 47327649
OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ON MONDAY 13 AUGUST 2007
AT 7:32PM
NATIONAL ANTHEM
The meeting opened with the National Anthem.
STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Pat
Sheehy AM read a statement of recognition of
PRAYER
The
Council Prayer was read by the Rev Neil Checkley.
PRESENT
His Worship the Mayor Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, David Bradbury, Lexie Cettolin, Kevin Crameri OAM, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Ross Fowler, Jackie Greenow, Karen McKeown, Susan Page, Garry Rumble, Steve Simat and John Thain.
APOLOGIES |
There were no apologies. |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Ordinary Meeting - 23 July 2007 |
286 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler seconded Councillor Garry Rumble that the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of 23 July 2007 be confirmed. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Nil.
MAYORAL
MINUTE
Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM left the meeting, the time being 7:36 pm.
Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 7:37 pm.
1 25 Years Business Recognition Awards
287 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Pat
Sheehy AM and Councillor Jim Aitken OAM
That:
1. The Mayoral Minute on 25 Years Business Recognition Awards be received.
2. Letters of congratulations be sent to the award recipients and the Penrith Valley Economic Development Corporation.
Reports of
Committees
1 Report and Recommendations of the |
288 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Garry Rumble seconded Councillor Ross Fowler that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Penrith Valley Community Safety Partnership meeting held on 27 June, 2007 be adopted. |
2 Report and Recommendations of the
Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 30 July 2007 |
289 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Susan Page seconded Councillor John Thain that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 30 July, 2007 be adopted. |
3 Report and Recommendations of the
Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 6 August 2007 |
290 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Karen McKeown seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 6 August, 2007 be adopted. |
MASTER PROGRAM REPORTS
The City in its
Broader Context
1 Request for sponsorship assistance for
High Octane and Airbrush Expo on Sunday 9 September 2007 |
291 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Request for
sponsorship assistance for High Octane and Airbrush Expo on Sunday 9
September 2007 be received. 2. Sponsorship of the event to the value of $6,000 from the City Marketing budget be approved. |
The
3 |
292 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Greg Davies
that the information contained in the report on North St Marys Neighbourhood Centre be
received. |
2 Council Property - Expressions of
Interest for Community Sunday Markets at Penrith and St Marys |
293 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the
information contained in the report on Council Property - Expressions of Interest
for Community Sunday Markets at Penrith and St Marys be received. |
4 Young People with a Disability in
Nursing |
294 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor David Bradbury seconded Councillor John Thain that the
information contained in the report on Young People with a Disability in Nursing |
5 Request for increased Subsidy - Nepean
District Cricket Association (NDCA) |
295 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Karen McKeown seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri
OAM That: 1. The information contained in the
report on Request for increased Subsidy – Nepean District Cricket Association
(NDCA) be received. 2. An |
The City In Its
Environment
7 |
296 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Karen McKeown seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Claremont
Meadows Works in Kind Agreement for Embellishment of Eastern Precinct Park:
Developer - UPL (No. 9) Pty Ltd be received. 2. Council
enter into a Works in Kind Agreement with UPL (No. 9) for the embellishment
of the |
6 Domestic and Non-Domestic Waste
Contracts |
297 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Garry Rumble seconded Councillor Susan Page That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Domestic and
Non-Domestic Waste Contracts be received. 2. Council approve Visy’s proposal to change the Scania trucks nominated in its tender to Volvo trucks of Euro 5 compliance, with delivery anticipated in March 2008. In the interim Visy will provide and maintain suitable used trucks to perform the recycling collection service as from 7 October 2007. 3. A further report be presented to Council detailing the outcome of SITA’s negotiations with Remondis employees. |
8 Request for Additional Motion - 2007
Local Government Association Conference |
298 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Lexie
Cettolin That: 1. The information contained in the
report regarding the Request for Additional Motion - 2007 Local Government Association
Conference concerning Fireweed be received. 2. A motion be submitted to the 2007 Local
Government Association Conference, as follows: “That the Local Government Association
request the State Government to assist in the control and eradication of
Fireweed.” |
The City Supported
by Infrastructure
9 Federal Government Auslink Black Spot
Program |
299 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Garry
Rumble That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Federal
Government Auslink Black Spot Program be received. 2. Council make further representations to
both State and Federal Governments, regarding the high accident history on 3. Investigations
be undertaken into the possibility of banning the right turning movement
during peak times out of |
10 Federal Government 2008/2009
"Auslink Black Spot Program" submissions |
300 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Federal
Government 2008/2009 "Auslink Black Spot Program" submissions be
received. 2. Council endorse the 7 projects listed under ‘Table A’ of the present report for submission to the Roads and Traffic Authority for funding under the Federal Government 2008/2009 “Auslink Black Spot Program”. 3. The Roads and Traffic Authority be requested to investigate traffic safety on roads under its jurisdiction at locations indicated in ‘Table B’ of this report. |
Leadership and
Organisation
11 Amendment to the 2007 Meeting Calendar |
301 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Amendment to the
2007 Meeting Calendar be received. 2. The 2007 Council Meeting Calendar be amended so that: · the Ordinary Council Meetings scheduled for 29 October 2007 and 19 November 2007 be held on 15 October 2007 and 5 November 2007 respectively; · the Policy Review Committee Meeting scheduled for 5 November 2007 be held on 19 November 2007; · an additional Policy Review Committee meeting be held on 29 October 2007; · the Ordinary Meeting scheduled for 10 December 2007 be held on 3 December 2007; · the Policy Review Committee meeting scheduled for 3 December 2007 be held on 10 December 2007; and · an additional Ordinary Meeting be held on 17 December 2007. |
12 Communities in Control Conference 2007 -
From Advocacy to Policy - Communities Driving Change |
302 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler that the
information contained in the report on Communities in Control Conference 2007 -
From Advocacy to Policy - Communities Driving Change be received. |
13 The |
303 A MOTION
was MOVED by Councillor John Thain seconded Greg Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report
on The UK Economic Development Conference be received. 2. A memo be provided to the Mayor detailing
opportunities for funding attendance at the conference and an official visit
to 3. The Mayor or Mayor’s
representative attend the conference and visit An
AMENDMENT was MOVED by Councillor Ross Fowler seconded Councillor Mark Davies
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on The UK Economic Development Conference be received. 2. A memo be provided to the Mayor detailing
opportunities for funding attendance at the conference and an official visit
to 3. The Mayor attend the conference and visit
On being PUT to the meeting, the AMENDMENT was
LOST. On being PUT to the meeting, the MOTION was
CARRIED. |
14 Draft 2007-08 Management Plan Submission |
304 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Garry
Rumble That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Draft 2007-08
Management Plan Submission be received. 2. Mr Oliver be advised of the outcome of his submission in terms of this report. |
15 Summary of Investments &
Banking for the period 1 July 2007 to
31 July 2007 |
305 RESOLVED
on the MOTION of Councillor David Bradbury seconded Councillor Mark Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Summary of
Investments & Banking for the
period 1 July 2007 to 31 July 2007 be received. 2. The
Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer and Summaries of
Investments and Performance for the period 1 July 2007 to 31 July 2007 be
noted and accepted. 3. The graphical investment analysis as at
31 July 2007 be noted. 4. An urgent briefing be arranged on
Council’s investment strategy. |
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
QWN 1 |
Councillor Lexie Cettolin
requested that $465 from North Ward voted works be allocated to the |
306 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Lexie Cettolin seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as a matter of urgency. His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting. 307
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Lexie Cettolin seconded
Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM that $465 from North Ward voted works be
allocated to the |
QWN 2 International
Friendships |
Councillor Jackie Greenow
congratulated Council officers, in particular Jo Ryan, for their efforts in
hosting the recent visit by the |
QWN 3 Drainage
Issues - Showground Creek, Penrith |
Councillor Garry Rumble
requested a memo reply to South Ward Councillors, including copies of
correspondence to the affected resident of |
QWN 4 Weir
Reserve |
Councillor Garry Rumble
requested that, as a result of recent representations from visitors to the
Great River Walk and the garden at Weir Reserve, plaques be provided
identifying the types of trees planted in the garden. |
QWN 5 Removal
of Olive Trees - Soling Crescent, Cranebrook |
Councillor Garry Rumble
requested a report to Council regarding the removal of the olive trees in |
QWN 6 Electronic
Signs on |
Councillor Mark Davies requested
a memo reply on the current status regarding permissibility of the use of
large electronic signs along |
QWN 7 Peppermint
Reserve - Dumping of Green Waste |
Councillor Mark Davies requested
a memo reply addressing the dumping of green waste in Peppermint Reserve, |
Councillor Mark Davies left the meeting, the time being 8:30 pm.
QWN 8 Garbage
Services |
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM
requested a report to Council regarding the possible privatisation of garbage
services, the report to detail costs to Council and ratepayers, and the
possibility of excessive rubbish being stored on residential sites or dumped
in public places. |
QWN 9 Visit
to |
Councillor Ross Fowler requested
that, as he is now unable to attend the visit to |
308 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler seconded Councillor Greg Davies that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as a matter of urgency. His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting. |
309
RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler seconded Councillor
Greg Davies that Councillor Jim Aitken OAM replace Councillor Ross Fowler as
Council’s representative on the visit to |
QWN 10 Policy
on Political Advertising |
Councillor Ross Fowler requested
a report to Council on the formulation of a policy covering political, and
other, advertising on Council premises. |
QWN 11 |
Councillor John Thain requested
a memo reply providing an update on when Council will be presented with a report
regarding the use of Brookfield Oval as a training ground for the Brothers
Juniors Football Club. |
QWN 12 Parklawn
Place, St Marys - Provision of 'No Skateboarding' signs |
Councillor John Thain requested
a memo reply concerning the replacement of ‘No Skateboarding’ signs at |
Councillor Mark Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 8:34 pm.
QWN 13 Intersection
of Mamre and |
Councillor John Thain requested
a memo reply regarding the possibility of installing lights at the
intersection of Mamre and Erskine Park Roads, and requested that the matter
be referred to the Local Traffic Committee, with a report to be submitted to
Council, after consideration of the matter. |
QWN 14 Biodiversity
Corridors |
Councillor David Bradbury
requested a report to Council detailing the following:
|
QWN 15 Establishment
of Communal Noticeboard Facilities |
Councillor David Bradbury
requested a report to Council considering the merits of the establishment of
communal noticeboard facilities. |
QWN
16 Numbering
of Properties in |
Councillor David Bradbury
requested a report to Council outlining the current situation regarding ‘double
numbering’ on |
QWN 17 Allen
Place Toilets - Penrith |
Councillor David Bradbury
requested a report to Council detailing the status of the |
QWN |
Councillor John Thain requested
a memo reply concerning telecommunications works that have been carried out
to various sections of |
Committee
of the Whole
310 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Susan Page seconded Councillor John Thain that the meeting adjourn to the Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters, the time being 8:41 pm.
1 Presence of the Public
CW1 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Susan Page seconded Councillor John Thain that the press and public be excluded from Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters:
City as an Economy
2 Council Property - Station and Belmore
Streets, Penrith
This item has been referred
to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to commercial information of a
confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial
position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage
on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion
of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
City as a
3
This item has been referred
to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to personnel matters concerning
particular individuals and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be,
on balance, contrary to the public interest.
4 Review and Appeal of Determination of a
Development Application for erection of a single storey dwelling at
This item has been referred
to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to advice concerning litigation,
or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal
proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege and discussion of the
matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
The meeting resumed at 9:09 pm and the General Manager reported that
the Committee of the Whole met at 8:41 pm on 13 August 2007, the following
being present
His Worship the Mayor Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, David Bradbury, Lexie Cettolin, Kevin Crameri OAM, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Ross Fowler, Jackie Greenow, Karen McKeown, Susan Page, Garry Rumble, Steve Simat, and John Thain
and
the Committee of the Whole excluded the press and public from the meeting for
the reasons set out in CW1 and that the Committee of the Whole submitted the
following recommendations to Council.
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
2 Council Property - Station and Belmore Streets, Penrith |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of
Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler CW2 That: 1.
The information contained in the report on Council Property - Station and Belmore
Streets, Penrith be received. 2.
The four tenders for the sewerage connection to the State Government’s
land and Council’s land as submitted be rejected. 3. Council enter into negotiations for a construction agreement with CLM Excavations Pty Ltd for the sewerage reticulation connection for Lot 1121 and Lot 1122, corner of Station and Belmore Streets, Penrith for Line 1 and Line 2 as outlined in the report and in accordance with Section 178 3(e) of the Local Government (General) Regulations 2005. 4. The reason for not calling fresh tenders is the urgency with regard to connection of the sewer to the State Government’s land and Council’s land at the corner of Station and Belmore Streets, Penrith. 5. A further report be submitted to Council at the next available meeting setting out the terms of the tender process and the outcome of negotiations. 6. The Property Development Manager and Chief Financial Officer be authorised to reach and execute agreements with CLM Excavations Pty Ltd in accordance with this report. |
3 |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Susan Page CW3 That: 1. The information contained in the
report on Samuel
Marsden Road Riding Facility Committee be received. 2. The proposed actions outlined in the report be endorsed by Council. 3.
A |
4 Review and Appeal of Determination of
a Development Application for erection of a single storey dwelling at |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of
Councillor Ross Fowler seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM CW4 That: 1. The information contained in the report on Review and Appeal of Determination of a Development Application for erection of a single storey dwelling at Lot 25 DP 2417 (No. 24) Fourth Avenue, Llandilo be received. 2. That the Section 82A Review of Determination of Development Application for erection of a single storey dwelling at Lot 25 DP 2417 (No. 24) Fourth Avenue, Llandilo be determined by the Manager of Development Services. 3. The matter of unlawful building works be referred to Council’s Compliance Unit for appropriate action. 4. Council reconsider the relevance of the Clause 12 Development Standard in the preparation of the Rural Lands component of the new LEP and whether the property is identified as a “land locked” parcel. |
ADOPTION
OF Committee of the Whole
311 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Steve Simat seconded Councillor John Thain that the recommendations contained in the Committee of the Whole and shown as CW1, CW2, CW3 and CW4 be adopted.
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9:12 pm.
Procedure
for Addressing Meetings
Anyone can request permission to address a meeting, providing that the
number of speakers is limited to three in support of any proposal and three
against.
Any request about an issue or matter on the Agenda for the meeting can
be lodged with the General Manager or Public Officer up until 12 noon on the
day of the meeting.
Prior to the meeting the person who has requested permission to address
the meeting will need to provide the Public Officer with a written statement of
the points to be covered during the address in sufficient detail so as to
inform the Councillors of the substance of the address and a written copy of
any questions to be asked of the Council in order that responses to those
questions can be provided in due course.
In addition, prior to addressing the meeting a person addressing Council
or Committee will be informed that they do not enjoy any privilege and that
permission to speak may be withdrawn should they make inappropriate comments.
It should be noted that speakers at meetings of the Council or Committee
do not have absolute privilege (parliamentary privilege). A speaker who makes any potentially offensive
or defamatory remarks about any other person may render themselves open to
legal action.
Prior to addressing the meeting the person will be required to sign the
following statement:
“I (name) understand that the meeting I intend to
address on (date) is a public meeting. I
also understand that should I say or present any material that is
inappropriate, I may be subject to legal action. I also acknowledge that I have been informed
to obtain my own legal advice about the appropriateness of the material that I
intend to present at the above mentioned meeting”.
Should a person fail to sign the above statement then permission to
address either the Council or Committee will not be granted.
The Public Officer or Minute Clerk will speak to those people who have
requested permission to address the meeting, prior to the meeting at 7.15pm.
It is up to the Council or Committee to decide if the request to address
the meeting will be granted.
Where permission is to be granted the Council or Committee, at the
appropriate time, will suspend only so much of the Standing Orders to allow the
address to occur.
The Chairperson will then call the person up to the lectern or speaking
area.
The person addressing the meeting needs to clearly indicate:
·
Their
name;
·
Organisation
or group they are representing (if applicable);
·
Details
of the issue to be addressed and the item number of the report in the Business
Paper;
·
Whether
they are opposing or supporting the issue or matter (if applicable) and the
action they would like the meeting to take;
·
The interest of the speaker (e.g. affected
person, neighbour, applicant, applicants
spokesperson, interested citizen etc).
Each person then has five minutes to make their address. Those addressing Council will be required to
speak to the written statement they have submitted. Permission to address Council is not to be
taken as an opportunity to refute or otherwise the points made by previous
speakers on the same issue.
The Council or Committee can extend this time if they consider if
appropriate, however, everyone needs to work on the basis that the address will
be for five minutes only.
Councillors may have questions about the address so people are asked to
remain at the lectern or in the speaking area until the Chairperson has thanked
them.
When this occurs, they should then return to their seat.
Glenn McCarthy
Public Officer
02 4732 7649
3 September 2007 |
|
Leadership and
Organisation |
|
Mayoral Minute
2007 Mayoral Charity Ball
Strategic Program Term Achievement:
The organisation is managing its statutory
requirements and the needs of a participatory community in a transparent and
balanced way.
It is with great pleasure that I advise Council that on Saturday 25 August 2007 the Penrith Mayoral Charity Ball raised $33,000 for the Nepean Medical Research Foundation.
The evening’s great success can be attributed to the generosity of its sponsors and the hard work of the organising team comprising of Council staff and staff of the Nepean Medical Research Foundation.
The night consisted of high quality entertainment from the Time Capsules and in fitting with the evening’s “Hollywood” theme, four Marilyn Monroe look-alikes made their way through the crowd selling raffle tickets and keeping them entertained.
The
Chairperson of the Nepean Medical Research Foundation, Gwen McMaster-Fay was
delighted to be presented with a ceremonial cheque and thanked Council for
hosting the evening and all those present for their wonderful generosity. The $33,000 raised will help benefit the
health care of our community by providing much needed support to researchers at
This event would not have been possible without the generosity of our sponsors Penrith Lakes Development Corporation, SITA Environmental Solutions, Visy Recycling and Delfin.
I would personally and publicly like to thank the sponsors and supporters involved in the event, some of whom participated last year as well.
In addition to the sponsors, Panthers, Leonard Holt Robb, Pioneer Road Services, Hix Group, Jorga James Giftware, The Good Guys Penrith and Pioneer Tavern also supported the Ball.
Special thanks also to Evantz Management who once again worked tirelessly to ensure the success of the evening. And finally, I would like to thank all those who contributed to the success of this second Mayoral Charity Ball through their attendance on the evening.
Pat Sheehy AM
Mayor
That the Mayoral Minute on the 2007 Mayoral Charity Ball be received. |
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Reports of
Committees
Item Page
1 Report
and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 20 August
2007
3 September 2007 |
|
Leadership and
Organisation |
|
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
Policy
Review Committee MEETING
HELD ON 20 August, 2007
PRESENT
His Worship the Mayor Councillor Pat Sheehy AM, Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, David Bradbury, Lexie Cettolin, Greg Davies (arrived 7:40pm), Mark Davies, Ross Fowler, Jackie Greenow, Karen McKeown, Garry Rumble, and John Thain.
APOLOGIES |
RECOMMENDED that apologies be received and accepted from Councillors Kevin Crameri OAM, Greg Davies, Susan Page and Steve Simat. |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Policy Review Committee Meeting - 30 July 2007 |
RECOMMENDED that the minutes of the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 30 July 2007 be confirmed. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no declarations of interest.
MASTER PROGRAM REPORTS
Leadership and
Organisation
Councillor Greg Davies arrived, the time being 7:40pm.
1 2006-2007 Management Plan - June
Quarter and End of Year Review |
RECOMMENDED
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on 2006-2007
Management Plan - June Quarter and End of Year Review be received 2. The 2006-2007 Management Plan Review as at 30 June 2007 be adopted 3. The voting of funds and estimates of income for 2006-2007 be amended to reflect the revised estimates, expenditures and revotes as detailed in the Management Plan Review 4. Council revote the works as detailed in the Recommended Revoted Works Lists for inclusion in the 2007-2008 Management Plan. |
THE CITY AS AN
ECONOMY
Councillor Lexie Cettolin left the meeting, the time being 8:15pm, and did not return.
3 City and Town Centre Associations -
Business Plans and funding request for the 2007-08 financial year |
RECOMMENDED
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on City and Town
Centre Associations - Business Plans and funding request for the 2007-08
financial year be received 2. That funding for the Penrith City Centre Association and the St Marys Town Centre Association in the amounts of $277,844 and $208,439 respectively be endorsed 3. An
|
4 |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Penrith Valley
Economic Development Corporation 2007-08 Business Plan be received. 2. Council endorse funding in the amount of
$361,056 for the activities of the Corporation for the 2007-08 financial year
to be paid in two equal six-monthly instalments. |
The
2 St Marys Release Area - Public
Exhibition of draft Ropes Creek Precinct Plan and Development Control
Strategy |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report
on St Marys Release
Area - Public Exhibition of draft Ropes Creek Precinct Plan and Development
Control Strategy be received 2. Council advise Blacktown City Council that no objections are raised to the draft Ropes Creek Precinct Plan and Development Control Strategy. |
5 Rezoning Application - Penrith |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Rezoning
Application - Penrith 2. Pursuant to Section 68 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Regulation , the draft amendment to Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1996 (Industrial Land), as may be amended by Parliamentary Counsel, be forwarded to the Director –General of the Department of Planning, for the plan to be made. |
Leadership and
Organisation
6 Draft Policy on the Payment of
Expenses and Provision of Facilities to the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and
Councillors |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Draft Policy on
the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to the Mayor, Deputy
Mayor and Councillors be received 2. The Draft Policy on the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Councillors be placed on public exhibition for 28 days as required by Section 253 of the Local Government Act 1993. |
7 ALGA Infrastructure Ideas Register |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report
on ALGA
Infrastructure Ideas Register be received 2. The three
examples highlighted in this report are posted to the ALGA Website in response
to ALGA’s request 3. A copy of the schedule of outstanding infrastructure renewal included in the table in this report be forwarded to ALGA for its information and to Senator Kate Lundy in response to the Senator’s request. |
8 Service Specification Program |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report
on the Service
Specification Program be received 2. The Service Specification for Corporate Governance be adopted 3. The Service Specification for Neighbourhood Renewal be adopted 4. The Service Specification for Project Management be adopted 5. The Service Specification for Catchment Management be adopted. |
CONFIDENTIAL
BUSINESS
The meeting closed to consider Confidential Business, the time being 9:07pm.
1 Presence of the Public
RECOMMENDED that the press and public be excluded from the meeting to deal with the following matters:
Leadership and
Organisation
2 Personnel Matter - Workforce Issue
This item has been referred
to Confidential Business as the report refers to personnel matters concerning
particular individuals and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be,
on balance, contrary to the public interest.
3 Personnel Matter - Workforce Issue
This item has been referred
to Confidential Business as the report refers to personnel matters concerning
particular individuals and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be,
on balance, contrary to the public interest.
RESUMPTION
OF BUSINESS IN OPEN COMMITTEE
The meeting moved out of confidential session at 9:23pm and the General
Manager reported that after excluding the press and public from the meeting,
the
The General Manager reported that while in confidential session, the
Committee resolved the confidential business as follows:
2 Personnel Matter - Workforce Issue |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The
information contained in the report on Personnel
Matter – Workforce Issue be received 2. The approach to providing for a future pay increase for 2007 be endorsed. |
3 Personnel Matter - Workforce Issue |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The
information contained in the report on Personnel
Matter – Workforce Issue be received 2. The increase proposed in conjunction with a new Council Agreement be endorsed. |
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9:24pm.
That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 20 August, 2007 be adopted. |
Item Page
The
1 Penrith
Performing and Visual Arts Board - Advisory Committees
2
3 Increased
Subsidy - Nepean District Cricket Association (NDCA)
4 Update
of activities undertaken by the Development Services Department - Final Quarter
2006/2007
5 Development
Application 07/0530 proposal for Boarding Kennels and Cattery at Lot 1 DP 29321
(No.388-396) The Driftway,
6 Community
Assistance Program
The
City In Its Environment
7 Processing
and Disposal of Garbage and Residual Waste
8 Purchase
of a spreader for Recycled Organics Topdressing
9 Update
on the Campaign of the Western Sydney
10 Proposed
variation of a restriction on the use of Lot 12 DP1087962, Nos.
11 Draft
Plan of Management for
The
City Supported by Infrastructure
12 Tender
23-06/07 Construction of Skate Parks for
14 Luddenham
Road, Luddenham pavement rehabilitation and road shoulder sealing
Leadership
and Organisation
15 Pecuniary
Interest Returns
16 Review
of Ward Boundaries
17 Constitutional
Referendum - Election of Mayor
18 House
Numbering -
19 Penrith
Performing and Visual Arts Limited and Railway Street Theatre Company
20 2007-08
Financial Assistance Grant
21 2006-2007
Annual Financial Statements
The City in its Broader Context
There were no reports under this
Master Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS
PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
The
Item Page
1 Penrith
Performing and Visual Arts Board - Advisory Committees
2
3 Increased
Subsidy - Nepean District Cricket Association (NDCA)
4 Update
of activities undertaken by the Development Services Department - Final Quarter
2006/2007
5 Development
Application 07/0530 proposal for Boarding Kennels and Cattery at Lot 1 DP 29321
(No.388-396) The Driftway,
6 Community
Assistance Program
3 September 2007 |
|
The City as a
Social Place |
|
The City as a
1 |
Penrith Performing and Visual Arts Board - Advisory Committees |
|
Compiled by: Tony Jarrett, Acting Facilities Operations Manager
Authorised by: Steve Hackett, Director - City Services
Requested By: Councillor
Garry Rumble
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: The cultural assets of the City have been
integrated to establish its reputation as a creative place.
Critical Action: Further integrate the City’s principal cultural facilities to maximise
community benefit.
Purpose:
To inform Council
about the establishment, by the Penrith Performing and Visual Arts Board, of a
number of Advisory Committees, and the appointment of community members to
those Advisory Committees. The report
recommends that the information be noted.
Background
In July 2006,Council endorsed the new company structure for the Penrith Performing and Visual Arts (PPVA) Board, including the establishment of Advisory Committees, and endorsed Councillor and community representatives to that Board.
Since
that time, the PPVA Board has created sub-committees covering finance,
performing arts, visual arts and the conservatorium of music. The
sub-committees comprise Board members and relevant professional officers from
the Joan Sutherland Performing Arts Centre and
The process of establishing Community Advisory Committees has now been completed. It is envisaged that these Committees would meet 3 times per year with the respective PPVA sub-committees.
Current
situation
Council has been informed that in July 2007, the PPVA Board appointed members to the Conservatorium, Performing Arts and Visual Arts Community Advisory Committees. This followed advertising of Expressions of Interest in all local and regional newspapers for membership of those Community Advisory Committees.
At the time of integration of the former Joan Sutherland Performing Arts Centre Board and the Penrith Regional Galley Board into the PPVA, some existing board members were not appointed to the new Board. Those former members were invited to submit an expression of interest.
Additionally, those people who had unsuccessfully applied for appointment to the PPVA Board were invited to submit an expression of interest along with the wider community.
25 Expressions of Interest in total were received.
Criteria for selection to one of the Community Advisory Committees included living in the Penrith LGA (or surrounding LGAs), and the capacity to contribute across a number of disciplines. The PPVA Board endorsed a Selection Sub-Committee recommendation that the following people be appointed to the Community Advisory Committees. The Selection Sub-Committee comprised The Hon Peter Anderson AM, Councillor Jackie Greenow, John Mullane, Cathy Jarman, and John Kirkman.
Conservatorium
Community Advisory Committee
Ms
Dominique Anderson,
Performing Arts Community Advisory Committee
Mr Leo Bahlman, Ms Anne-Marie Clarence, Ms Linda Stainton, Ms Danielle Mead, Mrs Gabrielle Moran.
Visual Arts Community Advisory Committee
Mrs Jan Cannon, Mr Charles Glanville, Mrs Lynda Henderson, Mr Tony Lennon, Ms Ana Sastrias.
The Chief Executive Officer has indicated that the inaugural meetings of the Community Advisory Committees will be held in late September.
The Community Advisory Committees will work with the Board’s Sub-Committees to provide community input and advice across a range of art-form and education programs. Importantly, the Community Advisory Committees will provide direct advice from our local and regional community.
That the information contained in the report on Penrith Performing and Visual Arts Board - Advisory Committees be received. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
3 September 2007 |
|
The City as a
Social Place |
|
The City as a
2 |
|
|
Compiled by:
Authorised by: Tony Jarrett, Acting Facilities Operations Manager
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: A program of renewal for selected
neighbourhoods that contributes to a sense of community identity and
cohesiveness is being implemented.
Critical Action: Implement agreed strategies for the delivery of facilities, services and
infrastructure.
Purpose:
To consider a
request from the Management Committee of the
Background
The
name
The Kingswood Park Community Centre originally operated from a Council cottage from 1989 until the official opening of the current facility in 1997.
Kingswood
Neighbourhood Centre is located in
Current Situation
Council considered a report on 12 February 2007, outlining a request from the Kingswood Park Community Centre Management Committee that the name of the facility be changed to Illawong Community Centre.
The Committee argued that since the Kingswood Neighbourhood Centre was opened, there has been considerable confusion differentiating between the two buildings. This confusion extends to customer enquiries and bookings, tradespersons, security call outs and the general community.
The name “Illawong Community Centre” was not supported by Council, as there may be some confusion with the suburb Illawong, and the Committee was asked to consider other options.
The Management Committee has subsequently requested that the facility be re launched under the name “North Penrith Community Centre”.
Community Development
Manager’s Comment
It is
acknowledged that some confusion exists between the Kingswood and
Conclusion
Neighbourhood Facilities are currently
identified with a mix of geographic names (such as Berkshire Park Hall, Kingswood
Neighbourhood Centre and South Penrith Neighbourhood Centre), people (such as Arthur
Neave Memorial Hall and Harold Corr Hall), general names (such as Autumnleaf
Neighbourhood Centre), and street identities (such as Andromeda Community
Centre).
Renaming of the Kingswood Park Community
Centre to the North Penrith Community Centre is regarded as the most suitable
alternative.
If Council supports the name change, the
Neighbourhood Facilities Section would assist the Management Committee in
developing a re launch strategy.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Kingswood Park
Community Centre - Request for Change of Name be received. 2. The name Kingswood Park Community Centre be changed to North Penrith Community Centre. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
3 September 2007 |
|
The City as a
Social Place |
|
The City as a
3 |
Increased Subsidy - Nepean District Cricket Association (NDCA) |
|
Compiled by: Lindsay Clarke, Parks Coordinator
Authorised by: Raphael Collins, Parks Construction & Maintenance Manager
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: The City’s recreation and leisure facilities
and services meet its needs and are optimally used.
Critical Action: Ensure facilities and services reflect the City's diverse current and
future recreation and leisure needs.
Purpose:
To advise Council
of funding options available to increase the subsidy to Nepean District Cricket
Association for the maintenance and preparation of turf wickets. The report
recommends that the funds be made available from the Parks Operational Budget
in 2007/08.
Background
At the ordinary meeting of Council on 13 August 2007, Council asked for an urgent report, addressing funding options available to increase the subsidy to Nepean District Cricket Association for the maintenance and preparation of turf wickets. The increase in the subsidy is $15,000, which will take their subsidy up to $47,100.
Discussions with the Financial Services Manager have indicated that there were no available surplus funds in the 2007-08 budget to increase the subsidy to NDCA. Therefore, the only option to fund the increased subsidy is to reduce the parks operational budget by $15,000.
The parks operational budget comprises labour, plant and materials. The labour and plant components of the budget are fixed and cannot be reduced. The materials component however can be reduced, but the impact of this will be that some work through the year cannot be undertaken.
Financial
Services Manager’s Comments
The increased subsidy can be sourced initially from within the existing Parks Construction and Maintenance budget, however the full impact of the additional costs to the budget will need to be reviewed later in the year, and it may be necessary to source additional funding from any identified savings within other areas of the budget, to ensure that there is no adverse effect on any of the required maintenance works. For the next and subsequent years, an increase in the base budget for Parks could be considered for this subsidy.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Increased
Subsidy - Nepean District Cricket Association (NDCA) be received. 2. Funds be made available from the 2007/08 Parks operational budget to increase the subsidy to the NDCA to $47,100. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
3 September 2007 |
|
The City as a
Social Place |
|
The City as a
4 |
Update of activities undertaken by the Development Services Department
- Final Quarter 2006/2007 |
|
Compiled by: Steve Barratt, Building Approvals Unit Co-ordinator
Shari Hussein,
Development Enquiry Co-ordinator
Warwick Stimson,
Development Assessment Co-ordinator - South
Peter Wood,
Development Assessment Co-ordinator - North
Authorised by: Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: Redevelopment of existing areas contributes
to safe, sustainable, affordable and satisfying living environments and
cohesive communities.
Critical Action: Formulate and implement social
and cultural strategies for redeveloping established areas that support
cohesive communities.
Purpose:
To provide Council
with information relating to the Department's performance and compliance
activities. The report recommends that the information be received.
Background
Introduction
This report is for the period January – March 2007, and the report format is as follows:
1. Key Development Services
2. Other Development Services
3. Service Improvement
The highlights of the Development Services Department during this quarter included:
· Hosting of the inaugural Penrith Excellence in Design Awards on 1 June 2007. The awards were judged by professional representatives from the Government Architect's Office – NSW Department of Commerce, and presented to winners in five categories. Over 80 people attended the event.
· Development Consent
issued for $8.5million alterations to
· Development Consent
issued for $600,000 commercial premises in the
· Implementation of a program targeting soil and erosion controls on building sites.
1. Key Development Services
The 2006/2007 Management Plan provides Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the provision of key development services (eg development assessment and issuing of construction certificates). The performance achieved in this quarter is reported below. Other development services (eg fire safety and building audits) are detailed later in this report.
1.1 Comparison of applications received 06/07
Figure 1 details the applications that were received in the March quarter, compared to the same quarter last year. This graph reveals that there was an 11% (38) reduction in minor development applications and a 30% (97) reduction in construction certificates. There has been a 22% (29) increase in major Development Applications received in the corresponding period. The blend of development applications received has maintained a bias on commercial/industrial land rather than residential.
Figure 1
1.2 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Figure 2 below illustrates the Department’s service, in relation to measurable KPIs for major Development Applications for the quarter, and provides a comparison with previous years. The table below outlines the composition of major development applications determined in the quarter.
Application Type |
No. Determined |
No. & % within
target |
Target |
Multi Unit Housing |
4 |
4 (100%) |
60% |
Dual Occupancy |
10 |
6 (60%) |
60% |
Commercial |
58 |
44 (76%) |
70% |
Industrial |
10 |
8 (80%) |
75% |
TOTAL |
82 |
62 |
|
Figure 2
Figure 2 demonstrates significant improvements in determination timeframes for all KPI categories, in particular the residential categories. Whilst “industrial” was the only category to not achieve the yearly KPI, it exceeded its monthly KPI target by 5%. Across the board, there was a substantial improvement over previous years, and this is a reflection of the improvements made to the Department's structure and work practices over the past 12 – 18 months. It should also be noted that due to the decline in residential type development applications, there has been a reduction in the level of community consultation which influences the passage of a development application.
The following table provides details of KPIs for Council’s Building Approvals services for the quarter only.
Application
Type |
No.
Received |
No.
Determined |
No.
& % within target |
Target |
DAs for 2 Storey Dwellings |
26 |
16 |
(13) 81% |
70% within 40 days |
DAs for additions & Single Storey Dwellings |
275 |
252 |
(225) 89% |
85% within 40 days |
Building Certificates |
39 |
38 |
(37) 97% |
90% within 21 days |
Construction Certificates |
227 |
213 |
(200) 94% |
85% within 28 days |
Complying Development Certificates |
3 |
3 |
(3) 100% |
100% within 7 days |
Compliance Certificate Inspection |
734 |
734 |
(734) 100% |
100% within 24 hours of booking |
Occupation Certificates |
309 |
319 |
96% |
100% within 7 days of satisfactory final inspection |
TOTAL |
1613 |
1575 |
|
|
The KPIs in this quarter were met except those for the determination of Building Certificates. The actual performance for Building Certificates was only 1% less than the KPI.
1.3 Development Applications in Progress
1.3.1 Major Development
Applications
Figure
3 demonstrates that the levels in major applications received by
Council are steadily increasing. The number of determinations being produced by
the Development Assessment Unit is increasing comparably. Individual planning
officer workloads are still high due to existing vacancies although recruitment
has commenced to fill these positions.
It is expected that the existing performance will prove a challenge
while DA numbers continue to increase and vacancies exist. Where possible and
if needed, outsourcing of some work will be considered.
Figure 3
1.3.2 Minor Development
Applications
Figure 4 demonstrates that the number of applications received by Council has increased marginally in the latter part of the Management Plan year. The number of DAs determined has kept pace with the DAs received and, in fact, over the year the backlog of applications has reduced by 20.
Figure 4
2. Other Development Services
2.1 Pre-Lodgement Panel
Previous
Qtr |
Multi-unit
Housing |
Dual
Occupancy |
Commercial Industrial
|
Other |
Cancelled |
TOTAL |
Jan – Mar 2007 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
12 |
2 |
31 |
Percentage |
6% |
10% |
39% |
39% |
6% |
100% |
Current Qtr |
Multi-unit Housing |
Dual Occupancy |
Commercial Industrial |
Other |
Cancelled |
TOTAL |
Apr
– Jun 2007 |
9 |
11 |
12 |
14 |
0 |
46 |
Percentage |
20% |
24% |
26% |
30% |
0% |
100% |
The percentage figures for the April to June 2007 period show a significant rise in pre-lodgements for residential type developments compared to the January to March Quarter. The residential figures are encouraging, indicating that the market may be improving. The commercial/industrial figures remain strong and reflect a continuation of enquiries about large scale development. The total number of meetings is higher overall compared to previous quarters. This can be partially attributed to the promotion of the pre-lodgement service with customers via our duty planner service.
We are currently exploring ways to improve the pre-DA service, and in July we will start introducing some changes. For example:
· Commencing a trial of lodgement of pre-DA concept plans via email;
· Introducing a pre-DA request form (that will soon be available on our website);
· Providing for credit card payment in advance of the panel meeting;
· Introducing pre-lodgement discussions for construction certificates.
2.2 Building Audits
This program involves the review of development application files to ensure compliance with conditions of consent. It is an important activity as it confirms that Council’s legislative responsibilities are met, reduces the likelihood of future litigation, and reduces the risk to the lives of occupants of premises under review.
During the quarter, 478 files for residential developments were audited. The residential applications audited included individual dwellings (229), residential additions (43) and swimming pools (206). The majority of outstanding issues identified were minor and are being resolved by negotiation. Enforcement action was instigated for 19 of the files reviewed.
Any audit that reveals non-compliance with the conditions of consent that is not resolved by negotiation is pursued with future enforcement action. The enforcement action involves:
· The issue of notices and orders;
· Issuing Penalty Infringement Notices;
· Placing notations on Council’s Property Information System;
·
The enforcement action is continued until the compliance is achieved.
2.3 Fire Safety
This program comprises the approval and annual inspections of Places of Public Entertainment and the registration of Annual Fire Safety Statements on Council’s database. The Environmental Planning and Assessment Act require Council to assess and determine applications for entertainment venues. Annual inspections and review of approvals is a vital activity to ensure that safety levels are maintained.
Currently, there are 50 premises on the database that have annual entertainment approvals. During the quarter, 7 entertainment approvals were renewed for a further 12 months and one approval was issued for a new venue.
Owners of commercial and industrial premises are required by legislation to annually forward certification to Council, demonstrating that required fire services installed in their buildings are being maintained to an appropriate level. As part of the Fire Safety Program, these certificates are reviewed to ensure that all fire services have been checked, and that the certificates have been completed in accordance with the requirements of the legislation. The certificates are also registered on a database. Owners are reminded of their responsibilities, and appropriate enforcement action is taken if they do not comply with these responsibilities.
This program has been implemented to reduce risks to life by encouraging building owners to maintain fire services so that in an emergency they are likely to operate effectively. This equipment is designed to either warn building occupants of hazardous conditions and/or suppresses those conditions.
During the quarter, 205 properties were added to the database, increasing the total premises to 1,000. Additionally, 98 Annual Fire Safety Statements were received from existing properties previously registered on the database.
2.4 Enforcement Matters
The following table
details the complaints received and actioned during the quarter.
Complaint Type |
Received |
Outstanding No. |
Unauthorised / Non-compliant development |
25 |
0 |
Construction Sites |
5 |
1 |
Dangerous Structures |
5 |
0 |
Stormwater Flooding - Urban |
13 |
2 |
Swimming Pool Fencing |
6 |
3 |
Waste Management |
4 |
0 |
Fire Safety |
3 |
0 |
Conditions of Approval |
1 |
0 |
During the quarter, a total of 62 complaints relating to building matters were received, with 56 (90%) being resolved. The unresolved complaints are subject to ongoing action and will be pursued until they are satisfactorily finalised.
2.5 Customer Service
The Administration Unit of the Development Services Department handles all Customer Service functions, and in this quarter achieved the following results:
· answered approximately 7,513 incoming phone calls;
· produced 254 Outstanding Notice Certificates;
· acknowledged 153 complaints;
· answered 175 requests made under Section 12 of the Local Government Act;
· acknowledged over 95 submissions made in relation to development applications;
· scanned and converted over 400 consents into the new development application system;
· attended 47 panel meetings;
· prepared over 388 Development Application consents, 213 Construction Certificates and 319 Occupation Certificates.
3. Service Improvement
3.1 On-line Planning
Services
A separate report has been presented to the Procedures and Systems Team Meeting, providing a status of the investigations for the on-line planning services project. The goal is to ultimately deliver an online planning service that can allow users to make a zoning enquiry, fill out a form and lodge development application plans via the internet, to track the progress of their application, and to communicate electronically with other stakeholders including applicants, assessment officers, the community and referral agencies – all through a single, secure online portal.
Whilst the primary focus is on development applications, there are a number of other Council processes/transactions that could be delivered on-line. The task of managing information systems relating to the development industry is vast and also includes construction certificates, licences, planning certificates (s149s), developer contributions (under S94), rates notices (s.603 certificates) and so on. There are other components of these systems that also need standardisation such as application forms, statistical reporting, fees and charges, estimations of value of work, and access to documents lodged with Council for information requests (under FOI and s12).
A study has been conducted of what services are offered by other councils in NSW. Many councils are either building, or have built, online planning services, often as part of a partnership with other government agencies and federal funds. Key software providers gave demonstrations of the available products to Council officers in July and early August. The overall online planning services project is likely to take 2-3 years to complete (based on discussion with other councils) and needs to be adequately resourced by a project team across the organisation.
Conclusion
It is apparent that the level of development
activity is starting to slowly increase. Although there have been some
challenges experienced throughout this quarter, in terms of vacancy rates, the
department has maintained its ability to achieve the KPI targets. When compared to previous years, the
Department's performance, when assessed against the KPI's, has improved. This
is a reflection of the improvements made to the Department's structure and work
practices over the last 12 – 18 months and a substantial decline in ‘in-fill’
residential development applications which are subject to more community
involvement, negotiation and refinement through the course of the assessment
process.
That the information contained in the report on Update of activities undertaken by the Development Services Department - Final Quarter 2006/2007 be received. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
3 September 2007 |
|
The City as a
Social Place |
|
The City as a
5 |
Development Application 07/0530 proposal for Boarding Kennels and
Cattery at Lot 1 DP 29321 (No.388-396) The Driftway, |
DA07/0530 |
Compiled by: Allison Cattell, Environmental Planner
Authorised by: Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager
Requested By: Councillor
Kevin Crameri OAM
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: Redevelopment of existing areas contributes
to safe, sustainable, affordable and satisfying living environments and
cohesive communities.
Critical Action: Formulate and implement social
and cultural strategies for redeveloping established areas that support
cohesive communities.
Purpose:
To enable Council
to determine a proposal for Boarding Kennels and a Cattery at 388-396 The
Driftway,
Background
An existing approval remains over the site
for the training, trialling and breeding of greyhounds (DA183/85). The
operation resulting from this use was the subject of complaints, and subsequent
court proceedings pertaining to noise emissions from the use of a greyhound
training track, the source of particular concern being a mechanical lure used
for the track along the western boundary. On
To the south and directly adjoining the
property is Richmond Racecourse. There is an existing approval for a greyhound
trial track extending over both sites (DA211/91). The consent was subject to
conditions including:
– The creation of a right-of-way over Lot 1 DP 29321 in favour of Richmond
Racecourse to allow access to the trial track encompassing the existing toilet
facilities and parking area;
– The maintenance of site facilities for parking sufficient to serve the
business conducted;
– The use to operate so as not to cause injury to the amenity of persons
residing in the vicinity;
– The access road within Lot 1 DP 29321 to be maintained;
– Noise generation to be maintained within the limits of the Noise Control
Act 1970;
– Hours of operation being limited to daylight hours only and between the
hours of 7:30am and 9:30 and 4:00pm and 7:00pm Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday
and between 7:30am and 9:30am Saturday and Sunday.
As a result, the
Currently, the property owners have
considerably reduced the breeding, training and trialling of greyhounds on the
site and are currently operating boarding kennels for all breeds of dogs and
cats without approval. This was brought
to Council’s attention as signage on the site had changed to “All Breeds
Boarding Kennels and Cattery”. Subsequently, the owners of the site were
advised to either comply with the current approval or lodge an application for
the changed use. The owners have stated that they do not wish to proceed with
the current approval (DA183/85) should the current proposal be approved.
Prior to lodging the current application,
preliminary advice from Council’s Environmental Compliance Coordinator was
sought from the applicant relating to the existing consent and the current use.
Council officers met with the applicant
Site and surrounds
The
site is 4.203 hectares in area and is oriented in a north-south direction. The
site is located approximately 500 metres west of
The area is predominately characterised by long narrow lots used for rural purposes including boarding kennels and stables.
The proposed development
The application proposes the following:
– Surrender of DA183/85 for
training, trialling and breeding of greyhounds;
– Honouring a lease agreement
between Richmond Racecourse for use of right-of-carriageway, amenities block
and car parking on the proposed site until 9 March 2012;
– Boarding of a maximum of 60 dogs
and 20 cats;
– Operating hours of 7am to 5pm
Monday to Sunday;
– One advertising sign 1.8 metres by
1.2 metres at a height of 1.2 metres off the ground;
– Use and conversion for cattery purposes
of existing kennel buildings;
– Use of straight trial track as an
exercise area (not for trialling or training purposes); and
– Use of swimming pool for dog
exercise.
The application was accompanied by the following:
– Site plans (Appendix 2);
– A Statement of Environmental Effects;
– An Acoustic Report prepared by Camets Acoustics.
Planning Assessment
The development has been assessed in
accordance with the matters for consideration under Section 79C of the
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and having regard to those
matters, the following issues have been identified for further consideration.
1. Section 79C(1)(a)(i) – Any Environmental
Planning Instrument
Penrith Local
Environmental Plan 201 (Rural Lands)
Permissibility
The subject site is zoned 1(b) – Rural smallholdings under Penrith Local Environmental Plan 201 (Rural Lands). The proposed development falls within the definition of an “animal boarding, breeding, training or treating establishment” which is permissible with the consent of Council.
Zone Objectives
The proposed development is consistent with the objectives of the 1 (b) – Rural zone, including:
a) to assist in
meeting the demand for hobby farms and rural/residential development in Penrith
where it is consistent with the conservation of the rural, agricultural,
heritage and natural landscape qualities; and
b) to ensure that
development does not create unreasonable demands, now or in the future, for
provision or extension of public amenities or services; and
c) to ensure that
the form, siting and colours of buildings, building materials and landscaping
complement the natural scenic quality of these localities; and
d) to ensure that
views from main roads and the rural character of the area will not be adversely
affected; and
e) to ensure that
development will not lead to excessive soil erosion or run-off.
Tree Preservation (Clause 17)
No additional
development is required. Therefore, no trees are required to be removed as part
of this application.
2. Section 79C(1)(a)(ii) – Any Draft
Environmental Planning Instruments
The Draft Penrith Local
Environmental Plan (DLEP) 1999 (Flora and Fauna Conservation) applies to the
site. The built form will not be changing, no additional buildings are
required, and no tree removal is proposed. As there will be no additional
impact upon native vegetation or fauna, the DLEP does not apply to this
proposal.
3. Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) – Any Development
Control Plan
Penrith
Development Control Plan 2006 (DCP) – Chapter 4.9 (Rural Development)
The following
provisions are relevant to the proposal.
Services
Utility services are already established on
the site and will continue to service the proposed use.
Access
The existing driveway will be
utilised for access to the site. This driveway is also currently providing
access to Richmond Racecourse via a right-of-carriageway. It is recommended
that the use of the right-of-carriageway cease on 9 March 2012 and be
extinguished (Special Condition 2.2). The driveway will remain to provide
access to the dwelling, dog kennels and cattery.
Advertising
The applicant is proposing one
sign at the entrance of the property for identification from the street
frontage of the use operating within the site. The sign is 1.8 metres by 1.2
metres and stands 1.2 metres off the ground. It is recommended as a condition
of consent that the sign not be illuminated (Special Condition 2.3).
Car Parking
There is no defined car parking
rate for animal kennels within the DCP or the Road and Traffic Authority’s
(RTA) Guide to Traffic Generating Development. As such, a site-specific
analysis is required.
There are currently eight (8) car
spaces available on site, directly outside the kennels. There are also
approximately five (5) car spaces available to the south of the property that
are located behind a padlocked gate. This car park is within the
right-of-carriageway and is made available for the use of Richmond Racecourse
until 9 March 2012. The car parking area
will be removed as of 9 March 2012. It is recommended as a condition that the
gate remain to accord with the acoustic report (Special Condition 2.4).
The applicant has stated that
only the occupier of the site is to be the operator of the proposed dog and cat
kennel. As there are no employees or non-resident staff, the car parking
available will service those utilising the facility exclusively.
The applicant has indicated that
the time to drop off or collect a pet is between three (3) and five (5)
minutes. It is expected that there will be between five (5) and ten (10)
vehicle movements per day. Given the scale of the kennels indicated,
satisfactory car parking facilities for eight vehicles have been provided to
cater for the projected demand (Standard Condition K027).
Noise Generation and Control
The kennels are enclosed and are
designed to prevent cross viewing. The roller doors are closed of an evening
and music is played as background noise to prevent reaction by dogs to other
noises occurring outside the kennels.
The acoustic report prepared by
Camets Acoustics was based on noise monitoring in the afternoon of 16 March
2007 before peak traffic. Two noise monitors were used. One was positioned two
metres west of the kennels (monitor 1), and the other halfway down the length
of the straight track facing the kennels (monitor 2). The distance between the
monitors was over 200 metres. Noise was measured at each location for over an
hour and compared. During the monitoring, dogs within the kennels barked as did
dogs in adjoining properties. Noises from horses were also observed.
The results of the noise
monitoring demonstrated monitors were independent of each other with no pattern
emerging. The noise emitted from Monitor
1 was not greater than Monitor 2. Noise
levels emitted from the boarding kennels and cattery are within acceptable
noise criteria and this is credited to existing noise barriers such as fencing,
brick walls, roof treatments and the design of the kennels facing inward.
A total of 32 dogs and 9 cats were kennelled
at the time of monitoring. The result of modelling the data on twice the amount
of dogs and cats was an increase of three (3) dBA. With the 3 dBA adjustment to
the acoustic information, the noise from the kennels/cattery was found to be
below the background level during both day and night.
The acoustic report relies on the
following operations, measures and management practices being employed to
reduce noise emissions. It is recommended that this be conditioned such that:
– Training, trialling and breeding will not occur (Special Condition 2.5);
– No more than 60 dogs and 20 cats are kept on site at any one time and no
other animals are kept on the site (Special Condition 2.6);
– Animals are fed inside the kennels/cattery and during the day only
(Special Condition 2.7);
– Distressed dogs are treated immediately to reduce the impact of barking
(Special Condition 2.8);
– The five (5) metre high fence and other fencing will remain as a noise
attenuator (Special Condition 2.9);
– One owner and one dog will use the pool at any one time (special
condition 2.10);
– Vehicles using the right-of-carriageway to access Richmond Racecourse do
so between the hours of 7am and 7pm only (condition of consent for DA211/91);
– One dog at a time is exercised along the straight track (Special
Condition 2.11); and
– A lure/winch is not operated on the site (Special Condition 2.12);
– An Operational Management Plan be submitted that provides for additional noise mitigation measures such as dog calming techniques, actions taken against troublesome boarders, lock-up procedures and vehicle movement on the site (Special Condition 2.13).
Council’s Environmental Health Officer has
reviewed the acoustic report and has raised no objection to the proposal,
subject to recommended conditions of consent that:
§ Adopt the recommendations of the acoustic report, provide for limits on
noise emissions and certification that the building has been constructed to
meet the noise criteria specified in the acoustic report (Special Condition
2.14);
§ Provide for set operating hours, feeding and exercise times, and
appropriate treatment of distressed or injured animals (Special Condition 2.15,
2.7, 2.16 and 2.8 respectively);
§ Surrender the existing consent (DA183/85) for the training, trialling
and breeding of greyhounds (Special Condition 2.17);
§ Provide for satisfactory waste storage, disposal and management (Special
Condition 2.18); and
§ Provide for satisfactory kennel and landscape maintenance (Special
Condition 2.19 and 2.20).
Boarding, breeding, training/treating
establishments
The applicant has stated that the
current operational use on the site for the trialling, training and breeding of
greyhounds will cease should approval for the proposed dog and cat kennel be
granted. That is, trialling and breeding of dogs or cats will no longer occur
on the site.
Given the applicant currently has
approval for trialling, training and breeding greyhounds, the proposed boarding
kennels for cats and dogs can utilise existing car parking, stabilised driveway
access, waste services and established clientele. It is also acknowledged that
the adjoining property to the east has approval for dog kennelling. With the
property to the south being Richmond Racecourse, the proposed use is consistent
with other land immediately surrounding the proposed site.
Should approval be granted, the
breeding of animals will no longer occur. It is recommended as a condition that
animals are not to be sold on the premises (Special Condition 2.21).
In assessing the proposal against
the ‘Code to Control the Establishment of Boarding and Breeding Kennels’ (the
Code), the following is confirmed:
§ The allotment of the site has a site frontage greater than 90 metres;
§ The kennels are closer than 150 metres from residential dwellings and
cater for more than ten (10) dogs contrary to the requirements of the Code.
However the kennels already exist. Further, the only residence that is within
150 metres of the subject kennels has approval for dog kennels. The acoustic
report does not raise objection on noise grounds to warrant a relocation of the
kennels. In accordance with the aims of the code, potential impact upon
adjoining properties has been minimised, given the existing noise attenuation
measures including vegetation, fencing and directional and speed control signage
on the site;
§ All kennels proposed for use are screened from view from the street. A
site inspection revealed residue dog holding cages/kennels, light posts, a lure
track and associated tower along the straight exercise area. The light posts
and lure rail are not associated with the proposed use. It is recommended as a
condition that these structures be removed from the site (Special Condition
2.22) and the besser block watch tower be used for storage purposes only
(Special Condition 2.23);
§ All kennels are currently concreted to facilitate cleaning;
§ Sound-proof sheds for distressed or injured dogs are required and it is
recommended that this be conditioned accordingly. It is recommended that dog kennels are to be sound-proofed and maintained accordingly
(Special Condition 2.24);
§ Satisfactory car parking is provided, no trees will be removed and no
breeding will occur on site;
§ Dogs and cats are to be confined to their kennels at all times, except
during permitted exercise times (Special Condition 2.25);
§ The acoustic report submitted with the application demonstrates that the
proposal can operate with minimal impact on adjoining and nearby properties;
§ Services are utilised for the adequate removal of waste from the site.
4. Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of
the Development
Many of the likely impacts have been discussed
previously with reference to the DCP 2006. The following are additional
considerations:
Built and Natural Environment
The immediate area surrounding the proposed site includes Richmond Racecourse and other training, trialling and boarding uses for dogs and horses. Given this, the use is likely to support the character and possibly provide a service to surrounding properties.
There are gates at ‘The Driftway’ entry of the site where access to the kennels is gained. A condition is recommended that these be closed outside approved business hours to prevent entry to the site (Special Condition 2.26).
The proposed activity has the potential to emit odours. A condition is recommended for waste to be managed and the premises cleaned and maintained to prevent the generation of odours (Special Condition 2.27).
The lighting along the track and the lure rail are recommended to be removed, as they are associated with the previous use which is to cease as part of this application. The removal of this will improve the rural character of the site.
Sediment and erosion control measures are to be installed for the life of the development. Accordingly, no fill is to be introduced to the site and grass cover is to be established where dogs are exercised. It is recommended that this be conditioned (Standard Condition D005 and Special Condition 2.20).
Social and Economic
Submissions received during the notification period raised issues with the proposal, however, subject to recommended conditions of consent, they do not object to the proposal. The issues revolve primarily around the use of the straight exercise area along the western boundary. However, given the fencing along this boundary, and the recommendation to restrict the times this area can be used for exercise, it is unlikely that any further conflict will arise. The acoustic report concurs that the fencing will be a satisfactory noise attenuator for the use proposed within this area.
Given the current use of the site has greater potential for impact upon adjoining properties by way of noise emissions, the proposed use is likely to benefit the surrounding community. Further, the proposed use is likely to improve the functionality of the site. On 9 March 2012, the use of the right-of-carriageway, amenities block and car parking by third parties will cease and the extinguishment of the right-of-carriageway will commence. This will render the circular track on Richmond Racecourse invalid, as compliance with the conditions pertaining to access will no longer be possible. As such, it is recommended that DA211/91 be surrendered as of 9 March 2012 (Special Condition 2.28).
Site management
requirements
The
site is to be managed to minimise potential impact upon the amenity of the
area. It is
recommended that the applicant provide an Operational Management Plan (Special
Condition 2.13) that includes:
– Contact details of the operators of the kennels and cattery;
– A contingency plan aimed at addressing any concerns raised by Council or nearby residents, including action to be taken against troublesome boarders;
– Supervision of the cattery and kennels;
– Monitoring the health of dogs and cats and an emergency response plan in the event of an injury, illness or outbreak;
– Storage location of cleaning products in a weatherproof and lockable room;
– Dog calming techniques that are employed continuously on site and in the event that a dog or cat becomes aggressive,
– Lock-up procedures; and
– Vehicle movement on the site.
It is further recommended as a condition that a register of complaints, and the response taken, is kept by the operator (Special Condition 2.29). In the event of noise complaint, the applicant is to provide an acoustic report addressing the performance criteria achieved by the approved development. This report is to be prepared by a suitably qualified consultant and is to recommend additional mitigation measures that are to be employed.
Where the site is managed in
accordance with the recommended conditions, the impact of the proposed
development is likely to be positive.
5. Section 79C(1)(c) – The
Suitability of the Site for the Development
The proposed use is permissible in this zone and is of a scale that is sympathetic to the surrounding land uses. This use will improve the future character of the area, subject to the surrender of DA183/85. The site is suitable for the proposed development, as all services and structures required already exist as a result of the use of the site for trialling, training and breeding greyhounds. As such, dog exercise areas, kennels, stabilised access to the site and a car park are all established. The site is surrounded by other dog related activities, making it ideal for services providing kennelling for cats and dogs to be located in close proximity.
The proposed kennels and cattery are positioned to maximise their function and reduce visibility from the street. The cattery is located away from the dog kennels and a condition is recommended that dogs and cats board separately (Special Condition 2.30). The exercise area is well fenced on both boundaries, and the dog pool is positioned to allow for casual visits accessed from the car park area. The use-related, directional and speed signage on the site, barricades, stabilised car park area and waste storage area ensure a workable site.
It is
unlikely that the proposed use will impact negatively upon the road network as
the applicant has indicated that visits to the site will generally not exceed
ten (10) a day. There is additional patronage to the site via the
right-of-carriageway which allows visitors to the Richmond Racecourse access
through the applicant’s property. Whilst this varies, the applicant has
indicated that over the past twenty years this has averaged fifteen (15) visits
per session. However, it is recommended that this cease
6. Section 79C(1)(d) – Any Submissions made
in relation to the Development
Referrals
The application was referred to the following
and their comments have formed part of the assessment:
Referral Body |
Comments Received |
Environmental Health Unit |
No objection, subject to
conditions |
Community Consultation
In accordance with Chapter 2.7 (Notification
and Advertising) of Council’s DCP, the proposed development was notified to
nearby and adjoining residents. Council notified four (4) residences in the
area and received two (2) submissions from different occupiers of the same
residence in response.
The following issues were raised in the
submissions received and have formed part of the assessment.
Submission: "I have no objection
to the establishment of an animal boarding facility provided that Council's
strict dog control regulations and conditions are applied to ensure the
business does not have a negative impact... Acoustic disturbances are
most offensive during the night and it is paramount that noise attenuation is
addressed in the form of acoustic insulation and not left to ineffective
barriers such as wooden fences" Response: Refer to Section 3 (DCP 2006 - Noise Generation and Control) and
Section 4 (Likely Impacts) of this report for discussion. |
Submission: "I am concerned that the proposed All Breeds
Boarding Kennels and Cattery will become an addition to the present Greyhound
Training, Trialling, Kennelling and Breeding business". Response: As discussed in Section 4 of this report (Likely Impacts – Social and Economic), the existing greyhound training, trialling, boarding and breeding approval will be surrendered. |
Submission: "I am concerned about increasing the maximum
number of dogs on the site from thirty (30) to sixty (60)". Response: No
additional development is proposed as the existing kennels will accommodate
the proposed 60 dogs and 20 cats. Refer to Section 4 (Likely Impacts) and
Section 5 (Suitability of the Site) for discussion. |
Submission: "I am concerned with the proposal to use the
420 metre long straight track as an exercise area for dogs". Response: Conditions are recommended that provide for appropriate use of the track, specifically Special Conditions 2.5, 2.12, 2.16 and 2.22. |
Submission: “I am concerned with the excessive commercialisation
of the property”. Response: ‘Animal boarding, breeding, training or treating establishments’ are permissible in the 1(b) - Rural smallholdings zone. This includes commercial boarding activities. The
surrender of other use-related approvals and the operation of the proposed
boarding kennels and cattery by only the occupiers of the site will mitigate
the commercial scale of proposed use. |
Submission: “I am concerned with the accuracy of the acoustic
report”. Response: Refer to Section 3 of this report (DCP 2006 - Noise Generation and Control). |
Conclusion
In assessing the use against the
current relevant instruments, the proposal is permissible and satisfies the
requirements, subject to conditions. It is unlikely that the proposal will have
a negative impact on the surrounding environment, subject to the recommended
conditions. The site is suitable for the development proposed and is in the
interest of the public, and is thus worthy of support.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Development
Application 07/0530 proposal for Boarding Kennels and Cattery at Lot 1 DP
29321 (No.388-396) The Driftway, 2. Development Application 07/0530 proposal
for Boarding Kennels and Cattery at Lot 1 DP 29321 (No.388-396) The Driftway,
Standard
conditions 2.1 A001 (Plans) A019 (Occupation Certificate) A021 (Business registration) A030 (No retail sales) B001 (Demolition of lights and lure rail) B002 (AS for demolition) B003 (Asbestos) B004 (Dust) B005 (Mud/Soil) B006 (Hours of work) D001 (Sediment and erosion control measures) D002 (Spray grass) D005 (No fill) D010 (Waste disposal) K027 (Car parking – 8 spaces in total) L008 (Tree preservation order) L012 (Retain existing) Q006 (Occupation Certificate) Special conditions 2.2 The use of the right-of-carriageway over the property leading to Richmond Racecourse land is to cease as of 9 March 2012 and it is to be extinguished within six (6) months of this date. Written evidence that the extinguishment of right-of-carriageway has been lodged with Land and Property Information division of the Department of Lands is to be submitted by 9 March 2012. 2.3 The sign is to be fixed, not flashing. The sign is not to be illuminated 2.4 The gate restricting access to the rear of the site is not to be removed. 2.5 The trialling, training and breeding of animals is not permitted and is not to occur on the site. 2.6 No more than 60 dogs and 20 cats (regardless of age) are to be kept on the premises at any time. No other animals are permitted to be boarded on the site. 2.7 Dog and cat feeding is to be restricted to the hours between 9am to 9.30am and 4pm to 4.30pm. Dogs and cats are to be fed within the kennels and cattery respectively. 2.8 Distressed or injured dogs and cats are to be housed in an isolated sound proofed kennel/room while in recovery in accordance with the Statement of Environmental Effects. 2.9 The noise barrier located along the western boundary is not to be removed and is to be maintained and any damage to the noise barrier is to be repaired immediately. 2.10 One owner and one dog are to use the pool at any one time. 2.11 One dog at any one time is to be exercised in the straight exercise area. 2.12 The use of any lure being mechanical, motorised or otherwise is not permitted on the site. 2.13 An Operational Management Plan is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate that includes, but is not limited to: – Contact details of the operators of the kennels and cattery; – A contingency plan aimed at addressing any concerns raised by Council or nearby residents including action to be taken against troublesome boarders; – Supervision of the cattery and kennels; – Monitoring the health of dogs and cats and an emergency response plan in the event of an injury, illness or outbreak; – Storage location of cleaning products in a weatherproof and lockable room; – Dog calming techniques that are employed continuously on site and in the event that a dog or cat becomes aggressive; – Procedures and instances where dogs and cats may board with another; – Lock-up procedures; and – Vehicle movement on the site. 2.14 Noise levels from the premises shall not exceed the relevant noise criteria detailed in report number ARH72D11 (inclusive of amendments submitted 3 May 2007), prepared by Camets Acoustics Pty Ltd, dated 3 May 2007. The recommendations provided in the above mentioned acoustic report shall be implemented and incorporated into the design and construction of the development, and shall be shown on plans accompanying the Occupation Certificate application. A certificate is to be obtained from a qualified acoustic consultant certifying that the building has been constructed to meet the noise criteria in accordance with the approved acoustic report. This certificate is to be submitted to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate and three (3) months and twelve (12) months after the Occupation Certificate is issued. The provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 apply to the development, in terms of regulating offensive noise. 2.15 The operating hours are from 7am to 6pm Monday to Sunday. Delivery and service vehicles generated by the use are also limited to between these hours. 2.16 The dog exercise areas including the pool and straight track shall not be used between the hours of 6pm and 8am. 2.17 Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, development consent number 183/85 for the training, trialling and breeding of greyhounds is to be surrendered to Penrith City Council in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. 2.18 Solid waste is to be disposed of at a lawful waste facility, or, if suitable recycled. Solid waste is to be stored in a designated area prior to removal for disposal or recycling. Where possible, the waste storage area is to be located so that it is not visible to adjoining land owner/occupiers. The waste storage area is to be provided with a weatherproof cover when it is unattended or not in use. 2.19 Hosing out kennels with water is not permitted. Kennels are to be cleaned using predominantly dry methods that limit the use of water. Acceptable methods would include sweeping, mopping and manual collection and disposal of dog waste. 2.20 Grass cover is to be established and maintained in outdoor kennel runs and dog exercise yards. 2.21 The sale of animals is not permitted on the site. 2.22 The light posts and lure rail located along the straight track on the western boundary are to be removed prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate. 2.23 The besser block driving tower (BA 2645/85) is to be used for storage purposes only. 2.24 Dog kennels are to be sound-proofed and maintained accordingly. 2.25 Dogs and cats shall be confined to their kennels at all times, except during permitted exercise times. 2.26 The gates at ‘The Driftway’ entrance of the site are to be closed outside the approved hours of operation. 2.27 Waste is to be managed and the premises cleaned and maintained to prevent the generation of offensive odours. 2.28 Development consent number 211/91 for a Greyhound Trial Track is to be surrendered on 9 March 2012 to Penrith City Council in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. 2.29 A register of complaints and the response taken is to be kept by the operator. Upon request, this is to be supplied to Council. In the event of noise complaint, the applicant is to provide an acoustic report addressing the performance criteria achieved by the approved development. This report is to be prepared by a suitably qualified consultant and is to recommend additional mitigation measures that are to be employed. 2.30 Dogs and cats are to be boarded separately. 3. Those making submissions be notified of the decision. |
ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES
1. View |
Locality map for 388 The Driftway |
1 Page |
Appendix |
2. View |
Site plan for Dog Kennels and Cattery at
388 The Driftway |
1 Page |
Appendix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 September 2007 |
Appendix 2 -
Site plan for Dog Kennels and Cattery at 388 The Driftway Londonderry |
|
|
|
3 September 2007 |
|
The City as a
Social Place |
|
The City as a
6 |
Community Assistance Program |
|
Compiled by: Joanne Tran, Community Development Officer - Generalist
Joe Ibbitson,
Community Program Coordinator
Authorised by: Erich Weller, Community Development Manager
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: Strategies are in place to respond to the
social and health needs of the community.
Critical Action: Support community organisations to address the differing needs and
issues of the various age groups through Council's policy responses, program
initiatives and advocacy.
Purpose:
To advise Council
of a request for 2007-08 Community Assistance Program funding. The report recommends that Council approve an
allocation of $800, under the Rolling Component of the 2007-08 Community
Assistance Program, to assist the Warehouse Youth Health Centre in organising a
Young Men's Health Education Forum. The forum will be held on 13 September 2007
at the Warehouse Youth Health Centre in Penrith.
Background
Through the Community Assistance Program,
Council makes small grants to non-profit organisations and community-based
groups to help meet local community needs.
The maximum grant is $1,000.
There are three eligibility criteria endorsed
by Council, which are:
· Non-profit organisations providing one-off activities;
· Direct benefit to, and
participation from, Penrith residents;
· Projects and project management in
line with Council’s Access and Equity Policy.
Fundraising
programs or organisations whose main role is to fundraise are not eligible.
Rolling Component
There
are two components of the Community Assistance Program - the Planned Component
and the Rolling Component. The Planned Component of the
program is undertaken once a year in October/November. Recognising that not all needs for funding
can be foreseen, the Rolling Component allows for one-off requests to be
brought before Council at any time during the year. This provides a flexible supplement to the
Planned Component of the program.
Council
has received a request from the Warehouse Youth Centre for CAP funding to
assist with organising a Health Education Forum for young men aged between 12 –
24 years who are local residents of the Penrith Local Government Area.
2007-08
Community Assistance Program Budget
The total budget for the 2007-08 combined Rolling and Planned Components of the Community Assistance Program is $46,000. There has been no expenditure yet from the current budget. The CAP Planned Component funding round will open in late September/October 2007. This project will be undertaken prior to the Planned Component funding round as the proposed event will be held on 13 September 2007.
Young
Men’s Health Education Forum
The
Warehouse Youth Health Centre has requested CAP Rolling Component funding to
provide a health education forum for school leavers and young men aged 16 years
and over who are local residents of the Penrith Local Government Areas. The objective of this forum is to provide education to local young male
residents and youth workers on the topics of health issues and health needs of
young men.
The Forum will host guest speakers from the
South West Area Health Service (Sexual Health Unit and also the Aboriginal
Sexual Health Unit), the Nepean Division of General Practice, the
Approximately 50 participants will be
attending the forum. There will be no cost to the young participants, and
educational folders will be provided to those attending the forum. The event
will be held on 13 September 2007 at the Warehouse Youth Health Centre located
in Penrith.
The CAP funding will contribute towards the cost of hiring PA equipment, additional chairs, the preparation of educational materials/folders and, the provision of catering requirements for the forum.
After further budget negotiations with the sponsoring organisation, it is proposed that $800 be allocated from the 2007-08 CAP Rolling Component funds to assist them in organising a Young Men’s Health Education Forum.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Community
Assistance Program be received. 2. Council approve a grant of $800 to the Warehouse Youth Health Centre, under the Rolling Component of the 2007-08 Community Assistance Program, to organise a Young Men’s Health Education Forum. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
The City In Its Environment
Item Page
7 Processing
and Disposal of Garbage and Residual Waste
8 Purchase
of a spreader for Recycled Organics Topdressing
9 Update
on the Campaign of the Western Sydney
10 Proposed
variation of a restriction on the use of Lot 12 DP1087962, Nos.
11 Draft
Plan of Management for
3 September 2007 |
|
The City in
its Environment |
|
The City in its
Environment
7 |
Processing and Disposal of Garbage and Residual Waste |
|
Compiled by: Barry Ryan, Waste and Community Protection Manager
Authorised by: Barry Ryan, Waste and Community Protection Manager
Requested By: Councillor
Jim Aitken OAM
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: Waste to landfill and indiscriminate dumping
are significantly reduced and resource recovery is optimised.
Critical Action: Develop and implement service systems to complement waste reduction
strategies and satisfy community needs.
Previous Items: Domestic
Waste Contract Tenders - Ordinary Meeting - 5 March 2007
Domestic
and Non-Domestic Waste Contracts - Ordinary Meeting - 13 August 2007
Purpose:
To provide
information on the impacts on Council should the privatisation of WSN
Environmental Solutions occur as recently suggested in the media. The report recommends that the information be
received.
Background
On 5 March 2007, Council was provided with a report detailing the outcome of tender assessments for both the collection and processing of garbage, recycling and organics.
It was resolved at the meeting that WSN Environmental Solutions (WSN) be appointed as the preferred tenderer for the treatment and processing of garbage and residual waste. The resolution was based on WSN’s proposal to initially accept Council’s waste at the Eastern Creek landfill facility and then process the waste through the Arrow-Bio facility, which is expected to be constructed in Seven Hills. The use of this facility will be dependant upon the outcome of trials to determine the actual make up of residual waste, following the introduction of the organics waste services.
At the Ordinary Meeting of 13 August 2007, Council was provided with an update of the progression of waste contracts for domestic waste collection and disposal services, including the processing and disposal of garbage and residual waste. The report identified that contract negotiations with WSN are continuing.
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM, requested further information on this issue, following media reports suggesting that WSN may be privatised.
Current Situation
A recent article (8 August 2007) in the Daily Telegraph indicated that the State Government is considering the sale of WSN, although no time frame was indicated.
Recent advice from WSN is that the privatisation decision is a matter for the State Government, and the Board of WSN has made no resolution in respect to privatisation. However, should the privatisation of WSN occur, the current contract negotiations hold Council in good stead in regard to the cost of disposal and treatment of garbage and residual waste.
Council staff are negotiating a long term (15 year) contract with WSN to process waste to reduce waste to landfill. The cost of processing this waste is determined by the tender price and the make up of the residual waste following the implementation of the organics collection service.
This contract will provide Council with the assurance of long term disposal of waste at a price that has been fixed in accordance with the tender, regardless of whether WSN is privatised.
The contract will also provide for assignment of the contract in the event of privatisation, by specifying ‘the contractor will be able to assign whole or any part of its rights and obligations under the contract only with the written consent of the council’. Therefore Council will be in a position to be fully informed on new ownership of WSN if it should occur, and be able to negotiate with the owner if necessary.
Notwithstanding this, the introduction of SITA into the processing treatment market provides some competition, which should assist in holding prices at a competitive rate.
Conclusion
The
recent tendering process for the processing, treatment and disposal of garbage
and residual waste has placed Council in a good position should the sale of WSN
proceed as suggested in the Daily
Telegraph.
That the information contained in the report on Processing and Disposal of Garbage and Residual Waste be received. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
3 September 2007 |
|
The City in
its Environment |
|
The City in its
Environment
8 |
Purchase of a spreader for Recycled Organics Topdressing |
|
Compiled by: Lindsay Clarke, Parks Coordinator
Authorised by: Raphael Collins, Parks Construction & Maintenance Manager
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: Council leads our City by example and
through advocacy by implementing sustainability initiatives.
Critical Action: Promote sustainable production and consumption and sustainable procurement.
Purpose:
To seek Council's
approval to purchase a spreader to apply Recycled Organics to Council's
sporting fields. The report recommends
that the spreader be purchased as soon as possible with funds advanced from the
Waste Performance Incentive Payments.
Background
At the Policy Review Committee Meeting on 30 April 2007, Council considered a report on the Waste Performance Incentive Payments to Council. In this report by the Waste and Community Protection Manager it was proposed that the Waste Performance Incentive Payments be used to establish a reserve for:
· playing field improvements using recycled organics;
· resource recovery from street litter bins;
· resource recovery from parks litter bins.
The Waste and Community Protection Manager proposed the following expenditure from the
Waste Performance Incentive Payments:
|
Recycled Organics $ |
Parks litter bin $ |
Street litter bin $ |
Total $ |
2007/2008 |
40,000 |
45,000 |
35,000 |
120,000 |
2008/2009 |
40,000 |
45,000 |
35,000 |
120,000 |
2009/2010 |
300,000 |
45,000 |
35,000 |
380,000 |
2010/2011 |
300,000 |
47,000 |
36,000 |
383,000 |
2011/2012 |
300,000 |
47,000 |
36,000 |
383,000 |
2012/2013 |
300,000 |
47,000 |
36,000 |
383,000 |
2013/2014 |
250,000 |
47,000 |
37,000 |
334,000 |
2014/2015 |
200,000 |
47,000 |
37,000 |
284,000 |
2015/2016 |
200,000 |
47,000 |
37,000 |
284,000 |
2016/2017 |
200,000 |
47,000 |
37,000 |
284,000 |
He also proposed in the report that the Waste Performance Incentive Payments be used to establish a reserve to fund this expenditure. Details of the proposed reserve are as follows:
Year |
Projected income from Waste incentive $ |
Expenditure $ |
Reserve $ |
2006/2007 |
50,000 |
0 |
50,000 |
2007/2008 |
280,000 |
120,000 |
210,000 |
2008/2009 |
420,000 |
120,000 |
510,000 |
2009/2010 |
560,000 |
380,000 |
690,000 |
2010/2011 |
700,000 |
383,000 |
1,007,000 |
2011/2012 |
0 |
383,000 |
624,000 |
2012/2013 |
0 |
383,000 |
241,000 |
2013/2014 |
0 |
334,000 |
(93,000) |
2014/2015 |
0 |
284,000 |
(377,000) |
2015/2016 |
0 |
284,000 |
(661,000) |
2016/2017 |
0 |
284,000 |
(945,000) |
This proposal was included in the 2007/08 Management Plan and was subsequently adopted by Council.
Current
Situation
The abovementioned funding provides for the purchase and spreading of composted organics on sporting fields. In 2007/08 and 2008/09, 1,500 tonnes of organic topdressing will be utilised on sporting fields. In 2009/10 to 2012/13, 7,000 tonnes of organic topdressing will be used on Council’s playing fields per year.
The expenditure proposed is based on the organic topdressing being spread by a contractor. The current rate to spread topdressing by contract is $5 per tonne. For the years 2009/10 to 2012/13 this will total $35,000 per year
An alternative to spreading by contractor, is for Council to purchase a suitable mechanised spreader and utilise existing staff to topdress the fields. The cost of the spreader could be funded from the reserve and would then require less money to be drawn from the reserve over subsequent years. Staff costs would be funded from existing operational budgets.
The spreader required is the type used for large scale agriculture applications and the estimated cost of an Australian made machine is $42,000.
The preferred spreader is a trailer (8 tonne capacity) which can be drawn by an existing Council tractor. With the feed conveyor and spinners hydraulically driven from the tractor, these spreaders have a long life expectancy with minimal maintenance costs.
Revised tables of expenditure and proposed reserve movements follow to show how a spreader can be purchased and funded from the Waste Performance Incentive Payments.
Proposed Expenditure
|
Recycled Organics $ |
Parks litter bin $ |
Street litter bin $ |
Total $ |
2007/2008 |
80,000* |
45,000 |
35,000 |
160,000 |
2008/2009 |
38,000 |
45,000 |
35,000 |
118,000 |
2009/2010 |
275,000 |
45,000 |
35,000 |
355,000 |
2010/2011 |
275,000 |
47,000 |
36,000 |
358,000 |
2011/2012 |
275,000 |
47,000 |
36,000 |
358,000 |
2012/2013 |
275,000 |
47,000 |
36,000 |
358,000 |
2013/2014 |
225,000 |
47,000 |
37,000 |
309,000 |
2014/2015 |
180,000 |
47,000 |
37,000 |
264,000 |
2015/2016 |
180,000 |
47,000 |
37,000 |
264,000 |
2016/2017 |
180,000 |
47,000 |
37,000 |
264,000 |
* Includes purchase of spreader for $42,000
Proposed Reserve Movements
Year |
Projected income from Waste incentive $ |
Expenditure $ |
Reserve $ |
2006/2007 |
50,000 |
0 |
50,000 |
2007/2008 |
280,000 |
160,000 |
170,000 |
2008/2009 |
420,000 |
118,000 |
472,000 |
2009/2010 |
560,000 |
355,000 |
677,000 |
2010/2011 |
700,000 |
358,000 |
1,109,000 |
2011/2012 |
0 |
358,000 |
661,000 |
2012/2013 |
0 |
358,000 |
303,000 |
2013/2014 |
0 |
309,000 |
(6,000) |
2014/2015 |
0 |
264,000 |
(270,000) |
2015/2016 |
0 |
264,000 |
(534,000) |
2016/2017 |
0 |
264,000 |
(798,000) |
The reduced expenditure on recycled organics from 2008/09 to 2012/13 is made up of two components:
· payment for spreader purchased in 2007/08
· spreading by Council not contractor
From 2013/14 onward, the reduced expenditure is due to the spreading being carried out by Council.
The table shows the long term benefit to Council by extending the reserve from the Waste Performance Incentive Payments without decreasing the quantity of recycled organic topdressing used on playing fields.
There is a real advantage in purchasing the spreader as soon as possible. Council staff can use it for the smaller quantities of topdressing programmed for 2007/08 and 2008/09. Using the spreader now will help Council staff prepare for the much larger quantities programmed for delivery from 2009/10 onwards.
Waste and Community
Protection Manager’s Comments
The use of composted organics on sporting fields has been demonstrated to have significant beneficial effects including reduced hardness of the fields and increased turf cover.
The use of composted organics on our sporting fields is a key issue in ‘closing the loop’ on a significant amount of organic material that will be collected from residential premises in Penrith.
The purchase of a spreader is seen as a logical step in ensuring that the resource is available to Council at any time and reducing costs in the long term.
Financial Services
Manager’s Comments
The purchase of a spreader early in the program is a logical step that will deliver cost savings and efficiencies. It will ensure that Council staff have access to a spreader at times that suit the parks teams’ schedules and priorities. The $5 per tonne cost saving to Council will allow the program to extend to 2013-14 before the reserve will be exhausted. There will be minimal additional maintenance costs for the spreader and these can be accommodated within the existing parks maintenance budget.
That: 1. The information contained in the report
on Purchase of a
spreader for Recycled Organics Topdressing be received. 2. A spreader be purchased for Recycled Organics topdressing in the current financial year with funds advanced from the Waste Performance Incentive Payments reserve as detailed in the report. |
There are no attachments for
this report.
3 September 2007 |
|
The City in
its Environment |
|
The City in its
Environment
9 |
Update on the Campaign of the Western Sydney |
|
Compiled by: Wayne Mitchell, Environmental Health Manager
Authorised by: Wayne Mitchell, Environmental Health Manager
Requested By: Councillor
David Bradbury
Strategic Program Term
Achievement: Effective land use management policies, regulatory
practices and controls are being implemented to protect the environment.
Critical Action: In partnership with others, develop and implement strategies to improve
regional air quality.
Purpose:
To provide an
update on the campaign by the Western Sydney
Background
The
Western Sydney Alliance was formed almost a decade ago to oppose the proposed
second
The
The
most recent advice from the Minister for Transport and Regional Services, Mark
Vaile MP, is that the Government has no plans to build a second
The
Australian Government previously committed to a review of
As it
currently stands, the Badgerys Creek site (approximately 1800ha) remains
reserved by the Airports Act for a future airport, should it become
necessary. Without long-term plans for
integrated transport systems, and the consideration of an alternative site
outside the
The
privatisation of
While
the Badgerys Creek site maintains its reserved status, the only factor that will
prevent its development is the continuing and long-term ability of
In any
case, it appears almost inevitable that growth and expansion at
The
· NSW Legislative Council Inquiry into the relationship between air quality and health in the Sydney Basin – a detailed submission was made, which emphasised the existing air quality challenges confronting Western Sydney, and the additional and unacceptable risks to air quality that would result from a major airport at Badgerys Creek, and associated road based ground transport.
· Presentation to
Western Sydney Federal Government MPs – the Alliance Executive met with the
Member for
· Presentation to the
Minister for
· Badgerys Creek
Roundtable – The Alliance, in partnership with WSROC, held a forum to canvas
community, business and political views on the
· Delegations to
o Undertake its promised
review of
o Resolve the
o Work actively and
urgently with State and Local Governments to develop an integrated and prioritised
transport strategy for
Both delegations were well received.
· NSW State Election – the Alliance distributed flyers to remind residents of Western Sydney that the Badgerys Creek site is still reserved for an airport.
The
· Writing to all candidates in seats in Western Sydney seeking firm commitments of opposition to the Badgerys Creek airport proposal;
· Preparation of
campaign material for
· Preparation of a
joint transport paper in conjunction with WSROC. This paper will investigate the need for
integrated ground transport options associated with alternatives to a second
airport in the
· Organisation of a
Transport and Airport Forum in conjunction with WSROC. This forum will be the venue to discuss the
transport paper and facilitate debate about
· Possible delegations
to
Conclusion
The
Western Sydney Alliance still maintains an important role in opposing the
proposed second
The
uncertainty of the reservation of the Badgerys Creek site continues to cause
concern for residents of
That the information contained in the
report on Update on
the Campaign of the Western Sydney Alliance be received. |
1. View |
Badgerys Creek |
3 Pages |
Appendix |