3 September 2010

 

Dear Councillor,

In pursuance of the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 and the Regulations thereunder, notice is hereby given that an ORDINARY MEETING of Penrith City Council is to be held in the Council Chambers, Civic Centre, 601 High Street, Penrith on Monday 6 September 2010 at 7:30PM.

Attention is directed to the statement accompanying this notice of the business proposed to be transacted at the meeting.

Yours faithfully

 

Alan Stoneham

General Manager

BUSINESS

 

1.           LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Leave of absence has been granted to:

Councillor Karen McKeown - 17 August 2010 to 20 September 2010 inclusive.

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM - 3 September 2010 to 21 September 2010 inclusive.

 

2.           APOLOGIES

 

3.           CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

Ordinary Meeting - 16 August 2010.

 

4.           DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Pecuniary Interest (The Act requires Councillors who declare a pecuniary interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)

Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Significant and Less than Significant (The Code of Conduct requires Councillors who declare a significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)

 

5.           ADDRESSING COUNCIL

6.           MAYORAL MINUTES

7.           NOTICES OF MOTION TO RESCIND A RESOLUTION

8.           NOTICES OF MOTION AND QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

9.           ADOPTION OF REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEES

Waste Services Committee Meeting - 15 July 2010.

Access Committee Meeting - 4 August 2010.

Policy Review Committee Meeting - 30 August 2010.

 

10.         DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

11.         REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS

12.         URGENT BUSINESS

13.         COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE


ORDINARY MEETING

 

Monday 6 September 2010

 

table of contents

 

 

 

 

ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR

 

 

STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION OF PENRITH CITY’S ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CULTURAL HERITAGE

 

 

PRAYER

 

 

COUNCIL CHAMBER seating arrangements

 

 

meeting calendar

 

 

confirmation of minutes

 

 

PROCEDURE FOR ADDRESSING COUNCIL MEETING

 

 

MAYORAL MINUTES

 

 

report and recommendations of committees

 

 

DELIVERY program reports


 

ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR

 

 

 

Australians all let us rejoice,

For we are young and free;

We’ve golden soil and wealth for toil;

Our home is girt by sea;

Our land abounds in nature’s gifts

Of beauty rich and rare;

In history’s page, let every stage

Advance Australia Fair.

 

In joyful strains then let us sing,

Advance Australia Fair.

 

Beneath our radiant Southern Cross

We’ll toil with hearts and hands;

To make this Commonwealth of ours

Renowned of all the lands;

For those who’ve come across the seas

We’ve boundless plains to share;

With courage let us all combine

To Advance Australia Fair.

 

In joyful strains then let us sing,

Advance Australia Fair.

 



Statement of Recognition of Penrith City’s

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Cultural Heritage

 

 

Council values the unique status of Aboriginal people as the original owners and custodians of lands and waters, including the land and waters of Penrith City.

 

Council values the unique status of Torres Strait Islander people as the original owners and custodians of the Torres Strait Islands and surrounding waters.

 

We work together for a united Australia and City that respects this land of ours, that values the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage, and provides justice and equity for all.

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

PRAYER

 

 

 

“Sovereign God, tonight as we gather together as a Council we affirm that you are the giver and sustainer of life.  We come together as representatives of our community to make decisions that will benefit this city and the people within it. 

 

We come not in a spirit of competition, not as adversaries, but as colleagues.  Help us to treat each other with respect, with dignity, with interest and with honesty.  Help us not just to hear the words we say, but also to hear each others hearts.  We seek to be wise in all that we say and do.

 

As we meet, our concern is for this city.  Grant us wisdom, courage and strength.

 

Lord, help us.  We pray this in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord.  Amen.”

 

 

 

 

 


For members of the public addressing the meeting

 
Council Chambers

Text Box: Lectern

Group Managers                          

                
          

 
Seating Arrangements

 

 

 

Director
Craig Butler

 

 

Director
Barry Husking

 

 

 

General Manager
Alan Stoneham

His Worship the Mayor
Councillor
Kevin Crameri OAM
North Ward

 

Acting Executive Officer
Glenn Schuil

 

 

Minute Clerk

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


                                                        

 

 

Text Box: Public Gallery
Text Box: Managers
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Group Managers                          

                
          

 
   


2010 MEETING CALENDAR

February 2010 - December 2010

(adopted by Council on 9/11/09 and amended by Council on 19/4/10)

 

 

 

TIME

FEB

MAR

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUG

SEPT

OCT

NOV

DEC

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

 

Ordinary Council Meeting

7.30pm

1

 

 

3v

 

19

16#

6ü

11¨

8#

13

(7.00pm)

22#

22

19

24#

21*

 

 

27^

(7.00pm)

 

29

 

Policy Review Committee

7.30pm

15

8

 

10

 

 

9

13@

 

15

 

 

29@

 

 

28

12

30

 

18

 

 

Operational Plan Public Forum

 

6.00pm

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v

Meeting at which the Draft Operational Plan for 2010/2011 is adopted for exhibition

*

Meeting at which the Operational Plan for 2010/2011 is adopted

#

Meetings at which the Operational Plan quarterly reviews are presented

@

Delivery Program progress reports

^

Election of Mayor/Deputy Mayor

ü

Meeting at which the 2009/2010 Annual Statements are presented

¨

Meeting at which any comments on the 2009/2010 Annual Statements are presented

-                 Extraordinary Meetings are held as required.

-                 Members of the public are invited to observe meetings of the Council (Ordinary and Policy Review Committee).

Should you wish to address Council, please contact the Acting Executive Officer, Glenn Schuil.

 



UNCONFIRMED MINUTES

 OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF PENRITH CITY COUNCIL HELD IN THE

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

ON MONDAY 16 AUGUST 2010 AT 7:34PM

NATIONAL ANTHEM 

The meeting opened with the National Anthem.

STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM read a statement of recognition of Penrith City’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage.

PRAYER

The Council Prayer was read by the Rev Neil Checkley.

PRESENT

His Worship the Mayor Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM, Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Tanya Davies, Ross Fowler OAM, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow, Prue Guillaume, Karen McKeown, Kath Presdee and John Thain.

 

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Leave of Absence was previously granted to Councillor Robert Ardill for the period 26 July 2010 to 20 August 2010 inclusive.

 

APOLOGIES

257  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow that the apology from Councillor Marko Malkoc be accepted.

 

Councillor Mark Davies left the meeting, the time being 7:37 pm.

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Ordinary Meeting - 19 July 2010

258  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of 19 July 2010 be confirmed.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Councillor Kaylene Allison declared a Pecuniary Interest in Item 12 – Ninth Avenue, Llandilo - Xavier College Walkathon - Friday 3 September, 2010 as she is employed by the Catholic Education Office.  Councillor Allison stated that she would leave the Chamber during consideration of this item and would not take part in the debate.

 

 

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest - Significant in Item 4 – Development Application DA09/0525 - Three (3) Lot Torrens Title Subdivision - Lot 98 DP 238269, Lot 100 DP 591759, Nos. 27 & 45 Greenhaven Drive, Emu Heights. Applicant: Werrington Trust Pty Ltd;  Owner: Tresaire Pty Ltd as he has had business dealings with the developer.

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Significant in Item 15 – Development Application No. DA09/0810 Alterations and Additions and adaptive re-use of Heritage building for commercial purposes at Lot 11 DP 1056135 (No. 113) Great Western Highway, Emu Plains. Applicant: Hubert Architects Pty Ltd;  Owner: Penrith City Council as he has had business dealings with the developer.

 

Councillor Mark Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 7:38 pm.

 

Councillor Tanya Davies declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 17 - Section 96 Application DA09/0221.01 for Modifications to a Proposed Community Facility at Lots 7, 8 and 9 DP 247158 (No. 46) Bringelly Road and Lots 5 and 6 DP 250412 (No. 49) First Street, Kingswood. Applicant: Mission Australia;  Owner: Mission Australia as her mother-in-law is employed by Mission Australia.

 

Councillor Mark Davies declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 17 - Section 96 Application DA09/0221.01 for Modifications to a Proposed Community Facility at Lots 7, 8 and 9 DP 247158 (No. 46) Bringelly Road and Lots 5 and 6 DP 250412 (No. 49) First Street, Kingswood. Applicant: Mission Australia;  Owner: Mission Australia as his mother is employed by Mission Australia.

 

 

SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS

259  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Tanya Davies that Standing Orders be suspended to allow members of the public to address the meeting, the time being 7:39 pm.

 

Ms Kristina McColl

 

Item 4  - Development Application DA09/0525 - Three (3) Lot Torrens Title Subdivision - Lot 98 DP 238269, Lot 100 DP 591759, Nos.27 & 45 Greenhaven Drive, Emu Heights. Applicant: Werrington Trust Pty Ltd;  Owner: Tresaire Pty Ltd.

 

Ms McColl, an affected person and member of Emu Heights Escarpment Group, spoke in support of the recommendation to refuse the proposed development.  Ms McColl thanked the committee members of Emu Heights Escarpment Group and residents of the area for their ongoing support in protecting the escarpment.  Ms McColl went on to provide a brief summary of the aims of the Group and how the report by Council officers has reflected their concerns.

 

 

 

 

 

Mr Trevor Robey

 

Item 4  - Development Application DA09/0525 - Three (3) Lot Torrens Title Subdivision - Lot 98 DP 238269, Lot 100 DP 591759, Nos.27 & 45 Greenhaven Drive, Emu Heights. Applicant: Werrington Trust Pty Ltd;  Owner: Tresaire Pty Ltd.

 

Mr Robey, and interested citizen, spoke in support of the recommendation to refuse the proposed development and highlighted several points made in the report and recommendations and stated the importance of preserving the City’s amenity of bushland backdrop in this area.  Mr Robey expressed the view that it was gratifying to residents that the report covered issues of concern to them in this report, in particular the protection of natural heritage.

 

Mr David Haskew

 

Item 4  - Development Application DA09/0525 - Three (3) Lot Torrens Title Subdivision - Lot 98 DP 238269, Lot 100 DP 591759, Nos.27 & 45 Greenhaven Drive, Emu Heights. Applicant: Werrington Trust Pty Ltd;  Owner: Tresaire Pty Ltd.

 

Mr Haskew, the consulting town planner on behalf of the applicant, spoke in support of the proposed development.  Mr Haskew provided a brief background to the application and detailed the steps that have been taken by the applicant to mitigate any environmental impacts.  Mr Haskew requested that Council defer consideration of the application so that areas of concern could be further addressed by the applicant in consultation with Council officers.

 

Councillor Mark Davies left the meeting, the time being 7:58 pm.

 

Mr Vasilios Gouriotis

 

Item 16 - Development Application DA08/1327 - Proposed erection of a Shopping Centre comprising of a Supermarket and Speciality Shops at Lots 1, 2 & 3 DP 504928, Lot E, F & G DP 390228 and Lot 3 DP 214333 (No. 1) Park Road, Wallacia. Applicant: Vasilios Gouriotis;  Owner: Effie Gouriotis &  Andrew Gouriotis.

 

Mr Gouriotis, the applicant, spoke in support of the proposed development.  Mr Gouriotis stated that his family has lived and worked in the area for over 30 years and that the proposal would be run by the family, providing a great benefit to the local community and will create employment opportunities for the local area. 

 

Councillor Mark Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 8:00 pm.

 

Mr Gouriotis concluded by saying that the proposed development would provide a revitalised shopping centre and that it would be of significant importance to the Wallacia area.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr Simon Coffey

 

Item 18 - Development Application DA10/0667 - Proposed Music Event to be held 18 September 2010 and annually for a five (5) year period - Sydney International Regatta Centre - Lot 21 DP 1092147 (No. 152-233) Old Castlereagh Road, Castlereagh. Applicant: Q-Dance Australia;  Owner: Department of Planning.

 

Mr Coffey, the organiser of the Defqon music event, spoke in support of the application to hold the event at the Regatta Centre.  Mr Coffey stated that the applicant wanted a unique venue in which to hold this event and to provide an exciting music event for 18-30 year olds.   Mr Coffey outlined the economic benefits for the Penrith area and also detailed the measures which have been put in place to address noise issues.

 

RESUMPTION OF STANDING ORDERS

260  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor John Thain that Standing Orders be resumed, the time being 8:10 pm.

 

Councillor Greg Davies left the meeting, the time being 8:11 pm.

 

Mayoral Minutes

 

1        Visitor Centre wins gold in Greater Sydney Tourism Awards

 

Councillor Greg Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 8:15 pm.

         

261  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the Mayoral Minute on Visitor Centre wins gold in Greater Sydney Tourism Awards be received.

Councillor Jim Aitken congratulated the team for winning the Award and suggested that the Mayor held an afternoon tea for all the staff and volunteers involved with the Visitor Information Centre.

 

 

2        Local doctor retires after 43 years outstanding service to our community                     

262  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the Mayoral Minute on Local doctor retires after 43 years outstanding service to our community be received.

 

 

3        Helen Brownlee OAM honoured                                                                                       

263  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the Mayoral Minute on Helen Brownlee OAM honoured be received.

 

 

4        The Passing of the Hon. Roy Smith MLC                                                                        

264  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the Mayoral Minute on The Passing of the Hon. Roy Smith MLC be received.

 

 

Reports of Committees

 

1        Report and Recommendations of the Penrith Valley Community Safety Partnership Meeting held on 30 June 2010                                                                                                          

265  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kaylene Allison seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Penrith Valley Community Safety Partnership meeting held on 30 June, 2010 be adopted.

 

 

2        Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 2 August 2010                                                                                                                                     

266  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor John Thain that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 2 August, 2010 be adopted.

 

 

3        Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 9 August 2010                                                                                                                                     

267  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 9 August, 2010 be adopted.

 

In respect to Item 1 of the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 9 August 2010, Councillor John Thain requested clarification on the Biodiversity Conservation Corridor connecting the Wianamatta Regional Park to the former Air Services Australia site.  The Manager – Sustainability & Planning advised as follows:

 

“Mr Mayor, I refer Councillors to a memo that I circulated today which acknowledged an error in a report to the Policy Review Committee of 9 August. The report related to an opportunity to secure a biodiversity conservation corridor between the Wianamatta Regional Park and the former Air Services site.

One of the maps provided in that report identified a possible location for a biodiversity corridor and it separately labelled the lands over which a corridor might be provided as “Deerubbin Land” and “Private Land”. Now the labelling of the land in this way could be interpreted as drawing a distinction between the tenure of the land in each case.

However, as I reinforced in the memo, land that has been the subject of a successful land rights claim under State legislation is “private land”. As such, the Deerubbin land is, clearly, also “private land and it attracts all the same rights, entitlements and responsibilities as any other land in private ownership.

Any unintended suggestion or implication drawn to the contrary is regretted and I will ensure that any future reference to land that has been subject to a successful land rights claim is clear regarding its status as private land.”

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

A CITY OF OPPORTUNITIES

 

Procedural Motion

268  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the order of business be altered to allow consideration of  Item 4 before any other debate.

 

Having previously declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Significant in this matter, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM left the meeting, the time being 8:30 pm.

 

 

4        Development Application DA09/0525 - Three (3) Lot Torrens Title Subdivision - Lot 98 DP 238269, Lot 100 DP 591759, Nos. 27 & 45 Greenhaven Drive, Emu Heights. Applicant: Werrington Trust Pty Ltd;  Owner: Tresaire Pty Ltd                                     DA09/0525

269  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Kath Presdee

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Development Application DA09/0525 - Three (3) Lot Torrens Title Subdivision - Lot 98 DP 238269, Lot 100 DP 591759, Nos.27 & 45 Greenhaven Drive, Emu Heights be received.

 

2.     Development Application DA09/0525 - Three (3) Lot Torrens Title Subdivision - Lot 98 DP 238269, Lot 100 DP 591759, Nos.27 & 45 Greenhaven Drive, Emu Heights be refused for the following reasons:

 

2.1     The proposed development is inconsistent with the objectives of the 7(e) Environmental Protection zone under the Penrith Local Environmental Plan No.226 in that the proposed development would cause a significant detriment to the visual character and scenic value of the Blue Mountains Escarpment, lack of consideration of drainage and poor urban design outcomes from the proposed dwelling (Section 79C(1)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

2.2     The proposed development does not meet the provisions outlined in Clause 12 - Subdivision within Zone No. 7(e) of the Penrith Local Environmental Plan No.226 as it is considered that subdivision was not contemplated for the site (Section 79C(1)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

2.3     The proposed development is inconsistent with Clause 6 - Specific planning policies and recommended strategies of the Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 - Hawkesbury-Nepean River (No.2 - 1997) in respect to consideration relating to: 

 

·  Insufficient information to conduct a detail and accurate assessment of water quality and water quantity, impacts;

·  Deficient information relating to impacts of flora and fauna;

·  Significant impact to the riverine scenic quality as a result of vegetation removal;

·  Inconsistency with the prescribed subdivision pattern outlined in the applicable planning instruments.

 

(Section 79C(1)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

2.4     The proposed development is inconsistent with the objectives of the E2 Environmental Conservation Zone of the Draft Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2008 in respect of the consideration of the existing vegetation and scenic value of the area (Section 79C(1)(ii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

2.5     The proposed development is inconsistent with Clause 4.1 – Minimum Subdivision Lot Size of the Draft Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2008 in that the proposed development would not achieve the Development Standard (Section 79C(1)(ii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

2.6     The proposed development does not meet the provisions outlined in Section 6.8 – Blue Mountains Eastern Escarpment Siting Design and Management of the Penrith Development Control Plan 2006 as it is considered that subdivision was not contemplated for the site and the proposal would result in poor urban design outcomes to adjoining development (Section 79C(1)(iii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

2.7     The proposed development has not provided sufficient information to conduct a detailed and accurate assessment of the impacts to flora and fauna associated with the site (Section 79C(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

2.8     The proposed development would add pressure to the bushland areas to the west as a consequence of clearing and encroachment of urban development and would provide adequate amenity to existing development to the east of the site (Section 79C(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

2.9     The proposed development would cause a significant impact to the Blue Mountains Escarpment as the removal of trees to accommodate development would diminish the visual and environmental buffer established at the site (Section 79C(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979)..

 

2.10   The site is unsuitable for the proposed development having regard to the substantial constraints that apply to the site that results poor urban design, visual amenity and ecological outcomes (Section 79C(1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

2.11   The proposed development would be inappropriate having regard to the submissions received in response to the proposed development (Section 79C(1)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

 2.12  The proposal would create an undesirable precedent for inappropriate subdivision and development which is not in the public interest (Section 79C(1)(e) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

3.     Those making a submission be notified of Council’s recommendation.

 

4.     A further report come to Council regarding a request to the NSW Government and Opposition to support incorporation of all the forested land on the Eastern Escarpment into the World Heritage listed Blue Mountains National Park.

 

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

 

For

Against

 

Councillor Kaylene Allison

 

Councillor Prue Guillaume

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Kath Presdee

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Tanya Davies

 

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Leading City

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 8:32 pm.

 

1        2009-2010 Operational Plan - June Quarter and Year End Review                                

270  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on 2009-2010 Operational Plan - June Quarter and Year End Review be received.

2.     The 2009-10 Operational Plan Review as at 30 June 2010 be adopted, subject to adjustment of the Employee Leave Entitlements Reserve to 20%, in accordance with Council’s policy  by 30 June 2011.

3.     The voting of funds and estimates of income for 2009-10 be amended to reflect the revised estimates, expenditures and revotes as detailed in the Operational Plan Review

4.       Council revote the works as detailed in the Recommended Revoted Works Lists for inclusion in the 2010-11 Operational Plan.

 

 

 

2        Council Property - Easement to Drain Water over Lot 25 DP 31478, Nos. 16-18 Collins Street, St Marys                                                                                                                 

271  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Karen McKeown

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Council Property - Easement to Drain Water over Lot 25 DP 31478, Nos. 16-18 Collins Street, St Marys be received.

2.     Council grant an easement to drain water over Open Space land on Lot 25 DP 31478, Nos. 16-18 Collins Street, St Marys to benefit proposed Lot 11 in the subdivision of Lot 1 DP1031030 at No. 27 Monfarville Street, St Marys.

 

3.     Payment of compensation by the applicant to Council in the amount of $20,000 be required for the grant of the easement over Lot 25 DP 31478, Nos. 16-18 Collins Street, St Marys.

 

4.     The applicant be responsible for all drainage costs, survey, legal and registration costs associated with the creation of the easement.

 

5.     The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all necessary documentation to effect registration of the easement.

 

 

 

3        Summary of Investments & Banking for the Period 1 July to 31 July 2010                   

272  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Mark Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Summary of Investments & Banking for the Period 1 July to 31 July 2010 be received.

 

2.     The Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer and Summaries of Investments and Performance for the period 1 July 2010 to 31 July 2010 be noted and accepted.

 

3.     The graphical investment analysis as at 31 July 2010 be noted.

 

 

A Liveable City

 

7        RTA 2010/2011 Road Funding Grants                                                                              

273  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on RTA 2010/2011 Road Funding Grants be received.

2.    The RTA 2010/11 Program Funding Block Grant in the amount of $986,000 be accepted.

3.     Council accept the grant of $250,000, offered under the 2010/2011 Roads and Traffic Authority REPAIR Program, for the reconstruction of Forrester Road, North St Marys, between 200m north of Commonwealth Crescent and Christie Street.

4.    The Supplementary Road Component in the amount of $156,000 be allocated to the resurfacing of Second Ave, Llandilo (between Third Ave and Mayo Road).

5.     The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be affixed to the “Agreement for Block Grant Assistance to Council for Regional Roads 2010/2011”.

 

 

10      Urban Sustainability Project Grant Report                                                                       

274  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that the information contained in the report on Urban Sustainability Project Grant Report be received.

 

 

 

 

5        NSW Communities - Sport and Recreation Facilities Grant Program Results               

275  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on NSW Communities - Sport and Recreation Facilities Grant Program Results be received.

2.     Council accept the grant from NSW Communities - Sport and Recreation Facilities Grant Program Results Program of $100,000 to develop a playing field at Roper Road.

3.     Council thank the Member for Mulgoa, the Hon. D Beamer MP, for her support for the grant funds received for the development of a playing field at Roper Road.

 

 

6        Federal Government 2011/2012 "Auslink Black Spot Program" Submissions              

276  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Tanya Davies seconded Councillor Prue Guillaume

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Federal Government 2011/2012 "Auslink Black Spot Program" Submissions be received.

2.     Council endorse the six projects listed under Table 1 of this report for submission to the Roads and Traffic Authority for funding under the Federal Government 2011/2012 “Auslink Black Spot Program”.

3.     The Roads and Traffic Authority be requested to investigate traffic safety on roads under its jurisdiction at locations indicated in Table 2 of this report.

 

 

8        Desborough Road, St Marys - Review of Pedestrian Safety near St Marys South Public School                                                                                                                                  

277  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor John Thain

That:

1.   The information contained in the report on Desborough Road, St Marys - Review of Pedestrian Safety near St Marys South Public School be received.

2.   Council write to St Marys South Public School Principal providing copies of this report together with the two previous Local Traffic Committee reports (3 August 2009 and 1 February 2010).

3.   This matter be further investigated by the Local Traffic Committee including direct consultation with the local community.

 

Councillor Mark Davies left the meeting, the time being 9:06 pm.

 

9        New cricket practice nets, Jamison Park

 

Councillor Mark Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 9:10 pm.

         

278  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

That:

1.  The information contained in the report on New cricket practice nets, Jamison Park be received.

2.   The $10,000 shortfall be met equally from each Ward’s voted works.

 

 

11      Parks and Leisure Association 2010 National Conference                                              

279  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Mark Davies

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Parks and Leisure Association 2010 National Conference be received.

2.     Council nominate Councillor Ben Goldfinch and any other interested and available Councillors to attend the Parks and Leisure Association Annual National Conference.

 

 

Having previously declared a Pecuniary Interest in Item 12, Councillor Kaylene Allison left the meeting, the time being 9:15 pm.

 

 

12      Ninth Avenue, Llandilo - Xavier College Walkathon - Friday 3 September, 2010         

280  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

That:

1.       The information contained in the report on Ninth Avenue, Llandilo - Xavier College Walkathon - Friday 3 September, 2010 be received.

             2.       The Class 3 Special Event for the Xavier College Walkathon on Friday, 3                      September 2010 be endorsed subject to the following conditions:

(a)      All emergency service authorities and Westbus be advised by the       organiser prior to the event.

(b)     The organiser ensure that participants obey all Police directions and    road rules during the event.

(c)      The organiser indemnify Council against all claims for damage or        injury which may result from conducting the event.

(d)     A copy of the Public Liability Insurance of $10 million be forwarded to Council’s Risk Management Co-ordinator.

 

             3.       The applicant be advised of Council’s resolution.

 

 

Councillor Kaylene Allison returned to the meeting, the time being 9:17 pm.

 

Councillor Kath Presdee left the meeting, the time being 9:18 pm.

 

 

A Vibrant City

 

13      Request for Sponsorship of the 2010 NSWRL U16 Youth Development Cup               

281  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Request for Sponsorship of the 2010 NSWRL U16 Youth Development Cup be received

2.     Sponsorship assistance of $3,000 be provided from the City Marketing Budget.

 

14      Request for sponsorship of Formula One boat race series in Penrith Valley                 

282  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Request for sponsorship of Formula One boat race series in Penrith Valley be received.

2.     Sponsorship funding of $10,000 be approved from the City Marketing Budget.

 

Having previously declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest - Significant in Item 15, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM left the meeting, the time being 9:18 pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15      Development Application No. DA09/0810 Alterations and Additions and adaptive re-use of Heritage building for commercial purposes at Lot 11 DP 1056135 (No. 113) Great Western Highway, Emu Plains. Applicant: Hubert Architects Pty Ltd;  Owner: Penrith City Council                                                                                                                           DA09/0810

 

Councillor Karen McKeown returned to the meeting, the time being 9:19 pm.

 

283  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Greg Davies

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Development Application No. DA09/0810 Alterations and Additions and adaptive re-use of Heritage building for commercial purposes at Lot 11 DP 1056135 (No. 113) Great Western Highway, Emu Plains be received.

2.     Development Application No. DA09/0810 Alterations and Additions and adaptive re-use of Heritage building for commercial purposes at Lot 11 DP 1056135 (No. 113) Great Western Highway, Emu Plains be approved subject to the following conditions:

          Standard Conditions

2.1   A001 – Approved Plans

A011 – DCP Construction

A026 – Advertising Sign

A039 - Graffiti

A046 – Construction Certificate

B002 – As for demolition and disposal to approved landfill site

B003 – Asbestos

C003 – Uncovering relics

D001 – Erosion and Sediment Control

D002 – Spray Grass

D009 – Covering of waste storage area

E01A – BCA Compliance (class 2-9)

E006 – Disabled access and facilities

E009 – Annual fire safety statement – essential fire safety (class 2 -9)

H001 – Stamped plans and erection of site notice

H002 (a)&(b) – All forms of construction

H003 – Traffic Safety during construction

H041 – Hours of work (other development)

H036 – Rainwater tank

H037 – Safe supply of water from catchment areas

H038 – Connection of rainwater tank supply

H039 – Rainwater tank pumps

I003 – Roads Act Approval 1

(b)     Provision of a heavy-duty gutter crossing 7.4m wide.

(e)    Provision of a heavy-duty vehicular footway crossing 6.0m wide.

(f)     Reinstatement of concrete footpath 1.2m wide in the Great Western Highway for the full property frontage.

(g)     Reinstatement of redundant gutter and vehicular crossings.

(h)    Opening of the road reserve for the provision of services including stormwater.

(i)     Placing of hoardings, containers, waste skips, etc. in the road reserve.

K002 - WAE

K009 – On Site Detention

K014 – Flood Proofing RL26.5 AHD

K019 – Connection to Council’s System

K025 – All land required for vehicular access and parking is to be concreted or sealed with a bituminous pavement.

K027 – Car Parking

L002 – Landscape Construction

L005 – Planting of plant material

L008 – Tree preservation order

L010 – Retain existing trees

P001 – Applicants Cost

P002 – Council Fees – Amended

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, all fees associated with Penrith City Council-owned land and infrastructure shall be paid to Council.  These fees include Road Opening fees and Infrastructure Restoration fees.

 

Q01F – Certification

Special Conditions

2.2     All car parking and manoeuvring must be in accordance with AS 2890 and Council’s requirements. Accessible spaces are to be located closet to the entrance to the building. Full details demonstrating compliance must be submitted with the Construction Certificate.

2.3     The proposed future use is not to attract a parking rate higher than 1 space per 40m2 floor area, unless additional on-site parking spaces are provided.

2.4     All vehicles are to enter and exit the development in a forward direction.

2.5     Subject to consultation with Blue Mountains Bus Company, arrangements are to be made with Council’s Building Projects Coordinator to relocate the existing bus shelter further to the south, in an appropriate position that does not hinder sight distances from the new driveway. A plan showing the new location shall be submitted to Council’s Traffic Section.

2.6     The required sight lines to pedestrians and vehicles around the driveway entrance are not to be comprised by landscaping, signage, fencing or display materials, or the relocated bus shelter.

2.7     A separate development application shall be submitted to, and approved by Council for uses of the building other than professional offices. Details of any proposed professional office use are to be submitted to Council prior to commencement of the use. Council may require a separate development application depending on the nature and scale of use.

2.8     A detailed structural engineer’s report on the structural adequacy of the buildings shall be submitted with the Construction Certificate application. The report shall specify all the works required to make the building structural adequate and to enable the issue of a certificate of structural adequacy for the buildings on completion of the works. A copy of the structural engineer’s certificate of adequacy for the building shall be submitted to Council.

2.9     The first floor of the main building shall only be used for storage purposes and shall not be used as a habitable room.

2.10   The existing well shall remain sealed to prevent access by any persons.

2.11   The design and construction of the proposed new driveway on Great Western Highway shall be in accordance with AS2890.1 – 2004 and the RTA’s requirement (6m wide at the kerbline).

  The redundant driveway along the Great Western Highway frontage of the site shall be removed with kerb and gutter reinstated to the RTA’s requirements.

Details of further requirements of the proposed driveway and kerb & gutter can be obtained from the RTA’s Project Services Manager, Traffic Projects Section, Parramatta (ph: 02 8849 2144).

A certified copy of the design plans (driveway, kerb & gutter) shall be submitted to the RTA for consideration and approval prior to the release by Council of construction certificate(s) for the development or commencement of any works.

2.12   The No Stopping restrictions on the south western side of the Great Western Highway at the traffic signals at Old Bathurst Road are to be extended to the end of the existing kerb and gutter to allow traffic to pass vehicles that are stopped waiting to turn right into the driveway. The restriction should be implemented prior to the commencement of any works relating to the proposed development. Prior to the installation of the parking restrictions the applicant is to contact the RTA’s Traffic Management Services on phone 8849 2294 for a works instruction.

2.13   The bus shelter and bus zone signage are to be relocated in consultation with the bus company and Council’s Local Traffic Committee.

2.14   The bus shelter is to be located/designed so as to not restrict sight distance for vehicles leaving the proposed driveway.

2.15   All vehicles are to be clear from the edge of carriageway and footpath before being required to stop.

2.16   The vehicle and pedestrian sightlines on the Great Western Highway shall be maintained for vehicles exiting the driveway and conform to the requirements of AS2890.1 – 2004.

2.17   Council shall ensure that post development storm water discharge from the subject site into the RTA drainage system does not exceed the pre-development application discharge.

Should there be changes to the RTA’s drainage system then detailed plans and hydraulic calculations of the stormwater drainage system are to be submitted to the RTA for approval, prior to the commencement of any works.

Details should be forwarded to:

The Sydney Asset Management

Roads and Traffic Authority

PO Box 973

Parramatta CBD 2124

A plan checking fee will be payable and a performance band may be required before the RTA’s approval is issued. With regard to the Civil Works requirement please contact the RTA’s Project Engineer, External Works Ph: 8849 2114 or Fax: 8849 2766.

2.18   All works/regulatory signage associated with the proposed development are to be at no cost to the RTA.

2.19   All demolition and construction vehicles and activities are to be contained wholly within the site as a work permit will not be approved along the Great Western Highway.

2.20   A construction certificate for the provision of engineer works (on-site detention system and car park) is to be approved by the certifying authority. Engineering design drawings are to be prepared strictly in accordance with Penrith Development Control Plan Part 2.3 Engineering Works and the Guidelines for Engineering Works for Subdivisions and Developments Part 1 – Design.

2.21   You are advised that Council’s adopted flood level for this location is RL 26.0 AHD. Use of this building should reflect the flood risk.

2.22   A landscape plan prepared by a qualified landscaping consultant reflecting the conservation management plan is to be submitted to and approved by Council with the Construction Certificate.

2.23   All recommendations in the arborists report by Australian Tree Consultants Pty Ltd dated 18 December 2009 are to be adopted with details included with the Construction Certificate application.

2.24   The protection of trees is to be undertaken in accordance with AS4970-2009 and must be erected prior to any site works.

2.25   Within the Tree Protection Zone prior to construction certificate, the area is to be treated with osmocote and 10kg of composted/pelletised chicken manure spread evenly over the area. The area must then be mulched to a depth of between 50-75mm with ‘no fines’ leaf mulch. The area is to be maintained until completion of works and issue of occupation certificate.

2.26   No incursions into the Tree Protection Zone are permitted without consultation from the Council Tree Management Officer.

2.27   Four suitable replacement trees as approved by Councils Tree Management Officer are to be planted on property prior to issue of Occupation Certificate.

2.28   An excavation permit is to be sought from the NSW Heritage Council under section 140 of the Heritage Act 1977 prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

2.29   Prior to issue of Construction Certificate the following items are to be provided to Council for approval:

(i)       Strategy for pest/termite control for underfloor inspections.

(ii)      Boundary fencing, including front fence 1:20 details to be provided.

(iii)       Front Verandah to be split sandstone in lieu of brick paving. Details at 1:20 scale to be provided.

2.30   All conservation and restoration works shall be undertaken in   accordance with the following guidelines and reports:

·        Australian ICOMOS Charter for the conservation of Places of Cultural Significance – The Burra Charter.

·        Otto Cserhalmi & Partners Pty Ltd – Specification of material and workmanship for the restoration of an adaption of Former Post Office, Emu Plains, July 1984.

·        Otto Cserhalmi & Partners Pty Ltd – Specification of material and workmanship for the restoration of an adaption of Former Post Office, Emu Plains, July 1986.

·        Otto Cserhalmi & Partners Pty Ltd – Specification of material and workmanship for the restoration of an adaption of Former Post Office, Emu Plains, July 1987.

·        Hubert Architects Pty Ltd – Former Emu Plains Post Office Conservation Management Plan, 25 October 2002.

·        Hubert Architects Pty Ltd – Former Emu Plains Post Office Schedule and Specification of Works for DA, 18 August 2009.

·        Hubert Architects Pty Ltd – Former Emu Plains Post Office Schedule of Finishes, 20 August 2010.

 

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

 

For

Against

 

Councillor Kaylene Allison

 

Councillor Prue Guillaume

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Kath Presdee

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Tanya Davies

 

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM

 

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 9:20 pm.

 

16      Development Application DA08/1327 - Proposed erection of a Shopping Centre comprising of a Supermarket and Speciality Shops at Lots 1, 2 & 3 DP 504928, Lot E, F & G DP 390228 and Lot 3 DP 214333 (No. 1) Park Road, Wallacia. Applicant: Vasilios Gouriotis;  Owner: Effie Gouriotis &  Andrew Gouriotis                                                               DA08/1327

284  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Tanya Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Development Application DA08/1327 - Proposed erection of a Shopping Centre comprising of a Supermarket and Speciality Shops at Lots 1, 2 & 3 DP 504928, Lot E, F & G DP 390228 and Lot 3 DP 214333 (No. 1) Park Road, Wallacia be received.

 

2.     DA08/1327 be granted a Deferred Commencement Consent with the following conditions:

Schedule A – Deferred Commencement

 

A.        A Section 140 permit under the NSW Heritage Act 1977 is to be obtained prior to any excavation of the site. A copy of this permit shall be submitted to Council including relevant documentation which supports this permit.

 

B.        The recommendations outlined in the Historical Archaeological and Impact Assessment prepared by Archaeological & Heritage Management Solutions Pty Ltd dated December 2008 shall be completed and details of provision within the development for interpretation of the site’s heritage values are to be submitted to Council for consideration and approval.

 

                          Schedule B – Conditions of Consent

 

2.1     A003       Approved plans that are architecturally drawn as amended by Schedule 1

2.2     A014       Lot consolidation

2.3     A017       DA for use

2.4     A019       Occupation Certificate

2.5     A026       Advertising sign (not for residential)

2.6     A032       Goods in buildings

2.7     A038       Lighting locations

2.8     A039       Graffiti

2.9     A046       Construction Certificate

2.10   B001       Demolition of existing structures

2.11   B002       AS for demolition and disposal to approved landfill site

2.12   B003       Asbestos

2.13   B004       Dust

2.14   B005       Mud/Soil

2.15   B006       Hours of work

2.16   C001       Employment of conservation architect

2.17   C002       Archival recording

2.18   C003       Uncovering relics

2.19   D001       Implement approved sediment & erosion control measures

2.20   D005       Approval required prior to any filling

2.21   D006       No filling without prior approval

2.22   D009       Covering of waste storage area (Applies to building works/demolition)

2.23   D010       Appropriate disposal of excavated or other waste

2.24   D013       Noise (Environmental Noise Impact Assessment prepared by Renzo Tonin and Associates dated 19 December 2008),

2.25   D014       Plant and equipment noise

2.26   E01A      BCA compliance for Class 2-9

2.27   E006       Disabled access and facilities 

2.28   G003       Section 73 Certificate

2.29   G004       Integral Energy

2.30   H001       Stamped plans & erection of site notice 1 (Class 2-9)

2.31   H002       All forms of construction

2.32   H041       Hours of work

2.33   H011       Engineering plans & specifications

2.34   H022       Survey

2.35   H025       Construction of garbage rooms

2.36   L001       General landscaping (Applies to most building works, not fitouts)

2.37   L002       Landscape construction        

2.38   L003       Report requirement

2.39   L005       Planting of plant material

2.40   L006       AS requirements

2.41   L008       Tree Preservation Order

2.42   Q01F      Notice of Commencement & Appointment

2.43   Q006      Occupation Certificate for Class 2-9

 

2.44   Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) shall be addressed by incorporating the following elements and details submitted to Council prior to issue of a Construction Certificate: -

 

Outdoor plaza area

·    Suitable gates/grills shall be installed to restrict public access to the area after hours. The type of fencing used should be open in style to enable passive surveillance of these areas.

 

Lighting

·    Outdoor lighting in the public domain shall be installed in accordance with CPTED principles.

 

Car parking

·    The basement car park shall be fitted with lockable security gates to restrict access to vehicles/persons outside of operational hours.

·    Signs shall be installed to clearly state the opening/closing times for the car park.

·    All surfaces of the basement car park shall be painted in light coloured paint or finished in light grey concrete to reflect light.

·    Adequate lighting and mirrors shall be installed near potential blind areas including under stair cases, wide columns and blind corners.

·    The plant room/storage area and waste bin/recycling areas of the basement car park shall be restricted from public access.

·    Emergency phone/help points shall be provided in the basement car park.

·    The lift doors shall be transparent and fitted with appropriate safety features, including emergency stop buttons, alarms and telephones, in accordance with Australian Standards.

·    Signage advising customers to lock their vehicles and remove valuables shall be installed in the car parks

 

Security

·    High quality CCTV shall be installed in conjunction with quality lighting to cover all areas accessible by the public including shop entrances and both car parks.

·    Each store shall be fitted with security fittings and alarm system.

·    Rear entry points to shops shall be locked at all times and access restricted to staff only.

 

Toilets

·    Entrances to toilets shall be clear of any screening to allow sufficient passive surveillance.

·    Toilet cubicle doors should open outward to allow access in an emergency. Doors should also have spring-opening hinges to allow doors to remain open when not in use.

·    Rear of toilet doors should have hooks located half way down to ensure handbags cannot be accessed over the top of the door.

·    Doors shall be installed to a sufficient gap between the floor and ceiling.

·    Avoid creating areas where items such as drug paraphernalia can be hidden (e.g. suspended ceilings)

·    Toilet fittings shall be installed flush to walls to avoid tampering or stashing of items.

 

Graffiti

·    Graffiti resistant paints/surfaces shall be used on the external surfaces to minimise opportunities for graffiti vandalism.

·    Any graffiti to the building should be reported to Police and removed rapidly to discourage repeat incidents.

 

Landscaping

·    Dense vegetation and shrubs with top to bottom foliage shall be avoided with low ground cover or high canopied vegetation being preferred to enable clear sightlines and maintain visibility.

·    Public seating shall be of a sturdy material and shall be treated with anti-graffiti coatings to deter graffiti and vandalism.

 

Waste

·    All bins shall be well secured with lockable lids.

 

Building Identification & Signage

·    All shops shall be clearly identified by signage that is large and clearly visible.

 

2.45   All civil works shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works and applicable Australian Standards.

 

2.46   All road works, drainage works utility adjustments, regulatory signage and dedications, required to effect the consented development shall be undertaken at no cost to Penrith City Council or the Road & Traffic Authority (RTA).

 

2.47   Any Construction Certificate issued by the Principal Certifying Authority or Certifying Authority shall incorporate plans and details for erosion and sediment control in accordance with the Department of Housing’s “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004.

 

2.48   Stormwater runoff from parking, uncovered paved areas shall be directed to stormwater pre-treatment systems.  The treatment devices shall be designed to remove the following pollutant loadings:

 

·    90% Litter

·    85% Suspended Solids

·    65% Phosphorous

·    45% Nitrogen

·    90% Oil & grease

 

Any Construction Certificate issued by the Principal Certifying Authority or Certifying Authority shall incorporate:

 

(a)   Specifications & installation details of the stormwater pre-treatment systems.

(b)   The approval of an operation and maintenance manuals/ programmes for the proposed devices.

 

A copy of the approved operation and maintenance manuals/ programmes shall be submitted to Penrith City Council with notification of the Construction Certificate issue.

 

2.49   The swept path of the longest vehicle (including semi-trailers) entering and exiting the subject site, as well as manoeuvrability through the site, shall be in accordance with the requirements of Austroads. In this regard, a plan shall be submitted to Council for approval, which demonstrates that the proposed development complies with this requirement.

 

2.50   Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate for building works the Principal Certifying Authority and/or Certifying Authority shall ensure that a Roads Act application, including the payment of appropriate fees for the following works, has been lodged with, and approved by Penrith City Council.

 

·    Provision of a new kerb inlet pit and piped drainage under the kerb and gutter in Park Road, connecting to the existing kerb inlet pit outside the golf club. The new kerb inlet pit shall be constructed clear of the golf club’s driveway.

·    Provision of road pavement construction in the form of a deceleration / left turn lane on the approach to the Park Road access driveway in accordance with Australian Standards and the RTA Road Design Guide including kerb and gutter, drainage and pedestrian ramps both sides of the vehicular access.

·    Provision of a double width access driveway in Park Road in accordance with the requirements of AS2890

·    Provision of a new pedestrian refuge island and line marking in Park Road. Pedestrian and vehicle sight distance (in particular sight distance to the new pedestrian refuge) shall be maximised in accordance with the Australian Standard. The pedestrian refuge island and pram ramps shall be relocated to a position mid way between the pathway from the New Speciality Shop 1 and the pathway from Car Parking Area 2 the footway shall be fenced with an appropriate style of fence to direct pedestrians to the pedestrian refuge.

·    Provision of a new pram ramp on the southern side of Park Road to line up with the new pedestrian refuge island.

·    Removal of the refuge islands, pram ramps and connecting pathways in Park Road at the eastern and western ends of the site and on both sides of Park Road.

·    Line marking and signage

·    Provision of new path paving for the full property frontage.

·    Provision of private drainage connection to Council’s road drainage system.

·    Removal of redundant vehicular crossings and reinstatement of kerb and gutter.

·    Opening the road reserve for the provision of services including stormwater.

·    Placing of hoardings, containers, waste skips, etc. in the road reserve.

·    Replacement of damaged kerb and gutter for the full property frontage.

·    Landscaping in the road reserve.

 

Pedestrian and vehicle sight distance (in particular sight distance to the new pedestrian refuge in Park Road) shall be maximised and in accordance with Australian Standards and the RTA Road Design Guide.

 

Penrith City Council shall approve all works completed on the footway area.  Contact Council’s City Works Department on (02) 4732 7777 to arrange an inspection of the works (and payment of inspection fees, if required).

 

2.51   Certified copies of the civil design plans of the proposed deceleration/left turn lane, new pedestrian refuge/median island, pram ramps and access driveways off Mulgoa Road and Park Road shall be submitted to the RTA for consideration and approval prior to the release of the construction certificate (Roads Act Approval) by Council and any commencement of road works.

 

The design plans shall be in accordance with the RTA’s Road Design Guide and other Australian Codes of Practice and shall be endorsed by a suitably qualified and chartered Engineer (i.e. who is registered with the Institute of Engineers Australia)

 

2.52   A Construction Certificate shall be issued by a Certifying Authority to include the following civil works.

 

(a)     Stormwater drainage

(b)     Stormwater pre-treatment system

(c)     Earthworks

(d)     Car park

(e)     Retaining walls

(f)      Sealed pavement for all areas of vehicular access.

(g)     Line marking and signage

 

Civil design drawings shall be prepared strictly in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works and applicable Australian Standards.

 

2.53   Stormwater drainage from the site shall be discharged to the street drainage systems in Mulgoa Road and Park Road.

 

The proposed stormwater drainage system shall be designed to ensure no adverse impact on adjoining properties by the diversion or concentration of stormwater flows.

 

The drainage design shall ensure that post development stormwater discharge from the subject site draining into the RTA drainage system does not exceed the pre-development discharge.

 

Investigation shall be undertaken to ensure that the existing street drainage has the capacity to accept the discharges from the subject site in the one in five year storm event.

 

Detailed design plans and hydraulic calculations of the stormwater drainage system shall be submitted to the RTA and Council for approval prior to the commencement of any works.

 

The proposed method of stormwater discharge shall be detailed in the Construction Certificate issued by the Certifying Authority.

 

2.54   Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority shall ensure that vehicular access, pedestrian access, car parking and manoeuvring areas associated with the subject development are in accordance with AS 2890.1, AS2890.2 and Penrith City Council’s Development Control Plan.

 

2.55   All vehicles shall enter and leave the site in a forward direction.

 

2.56   The vehicle manoeuvring design shall ensure that all vehicles, including semi-trailers, are able to be wholly contained within the site before being required to stop.

 

2.57   Prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate a performance bond is to be lodged with Penrith City Council for civil works in Mulgoa Road and Park Road.

 

The value of the bond shall be determined in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Bond Policy.  The bond will be administered in accordance with this policy. 

 

Note:

Contact Council’s Development Engineering Unit on 4732 7777 for further information relating to bond requirements.

 

2.58   A Road Safety Audit (RSA) shall be undertaken on the proposed road works by an accredited auditor who is independent of the design consultant. A copy of the RSA shall accompany the design plans submitted with the Construction Certificate application.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall ensure that the recommendations of the RSA have been addressed in any plans approved with the Construction Certificate.

 

2.59   Prior to the commencement of works on site, including approved clearing of site vegetation, erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed. The erosion and sediment control measures are to be installed in accordance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan(s) for the development and the Department of Housing’s “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004.

 

2.60   Prior to commencement of works a Traffic Control Plan including details for pedestrian management,  shall be prepared in accordance with AS1742.3 “Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads” and the Roads and Traffic Authority’s publication “Traffic Control at Worksites” and certified by an appropriately accredited Roads and Traffic Authority Traffic Controller.

 

Traffic control measures shall be implemented during the construction phase of the development in accordance with the certified plan.  A copy of the plan shall be available on site at all times.

 

Note: 

A copy of the Traffic Control Plan shall accompany the Notice of Commencement to Penrith City Council.

 

2.61   Prior to the Commencement of Works a dilapidation report of all Council owned infrastructure fronting the development in Park Road and Mulgoa Road is to be submitted to Penrith City Council.  The report is to include, but not limited to, footpaths, kerb and gutter, pavement and street trees and is to extend 10m either side of the development.

 

2.62   Work on the site shall not commence until:

 

·    a Construction Certificate has been issued,

·    a Principal Certifying Authority has been appointed for the project, and

·    any other matters prescribed in the development consent have been complied with.

 

A Notice of Commencement is to be submitted to Penrith City Council two (2) days prior to commencement of engineering works or clearing associated with the subdivision.

 

2.63   Erosion and sediment control measures shall remain in place and be maintained until all disturbed areas have been rehabilitated and stabilised.

 

2.64   All existing (aerial) and proposed services for the development are to be located or relocated underground in accordance with relevant authority’s regulations and standards.

 

2.65   Prior to the connection of private drainage to the street drainage system, an inspection is to be carried out by Penrith City Council’s Development Engineering Unit. A fee will be charged in accordance with Council’s adopted Fees and Charges, and is to be paid prior to the inspection.

 

2.66   All filling shall be undertaken in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works and AS 3798.

 

2.67   Prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate Lot/s 1, 2 & 3 in Deposit Plan 504928, Lots E, F & G in Deposited Plan 390228 and Lot 3 in Deposited Plan 213444 are to be consolidated as one lot via registration of a plan with the Land and Property Information division of the Department of Lands.

 

2.68   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall ensure that all works within the road reserve have been inspected and approved by Penrith City Council and RTA.

 

2.69   After completion of all civil works, works-as-executed drawings and compliance documentation shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.

 

An original set of works-as-executed drawings marked in red on a copy of the stamped Construction Certificate drawings, signed, certified and dated by a registered surveyor or the design engineer together with copies of compliance documentation shall be submitted to Penrith City Council with notification of the issue of the Occupation Certificate where Council is not the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

2.70   Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate the Principal Certifying Authority shall ensure that all civil works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the Construction Certificate, Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works, and relevant conditions of the development consent.

 

2.71   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate a restriction as to user and positive covenant relating to the stormwater pre-treatment systems, shall be registered on the title of the property.  The restriction as to user and positive covenant shall be in Penrith City Council’s standard wording as detailed in Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.

 

2.72   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate any damage to Council infrastructure not identified in the dilapidation report, as a result of the development shall be restored under the supervision of Penrith City Council.  Any rectification works within Mulgoa Road and Park Road will require a Roads Act application.  The application is to be submitted and approved by Penrith City Council prior to such works commencing.

 

2.73   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate and installation of regulatory / advisory line marking and signage, plans are to be lodged with Penrith City Council and approved by the Local Traffic Committee.

 

Notes:

1.     Contact Penrith City Council’s Development Engineering Unit on (02) 4732 7777 for further information on this process.

 

2.     Allow eight (8) weeks for approval by the Local Traffic Committee.

 

2.74   Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, marked pedestrian crossings shall be provided on the site having regard to pedestrian desire lines.

   

2.75   Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, convex mirrors shall be installed in locations where sight distance is restricted particularly for :

 

1.    Vehicle movements from the basement car park area into the basement ramp from Park Road.

2.    Vehicle movements from the ground level car park to the basement ramp from park Road.

 

2.76   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, signage which is clearly visible from the public road shall be placed within the development site.

 

The signage shall indicate that the exit ramp from the underground loading dock into Mulgoa Road be signposted "No Entry Exit Only”.

 

2.77   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate directional signage and line marking shall be installed on the site indicating directional movements and the location of customer parking to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

2.78   Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate a maintenance bond is to be lodged with Penrith City Council for footpaving.

 

The value of the bond shall be determined in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Bond Policy.  The bond will be administered in accordance with this policy. 

 

Note:

 

Contact Council’s Development Engineering Unit on 4732 7777 for further information relating to bond requirements.

 

2.79   Prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate an 88B instrument shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority with the subdivision plan.  The 88B instrument shall incorporate but not be limited to the following:

 

a) Positive covenant for water quality control systems

 

Details of non standard wording can be obtained from Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.

 

Council shall be nominated as the only authority permitted to modify, vary or rescind the above restrictions, covenants and easements.

 

2.80   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate a checklist and supporting documentation shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority demonstrating that each condition of the development consent has been satisfactorily addressed.

 

The Occupation Certificate shall not be issued until all conditions of consent except those relating to ongoing operational matters, have been completed.

 

2.81   All plant and equipment associated with the development shall not be in view from the public domain. Should any additional plant and equipment is to be installed, all steps shall be taken to ensure it is visually and acoustically screened.

 

2.82   Conditions outlined in correspondence issued from the Sydney Regional Development Advisory Committee dated 23 December 2009 shall be adhered to at the relevant stages of the development.

 

2.83   Prior to issuing of the construction certificate an acoustic compliance report is to be provided and approved by Council addressing the noise associated with the chosen mechanical plant and equipment associated with the development. The mechanical plant and equipment is to be designed and installed so that it complies with the noise criteria’s set out in the Environmental Noise Impact Assessment prepared by Renzo Tonin and Associates dated 19 December 2008. Should any noise mitigation measures be required to ensure compliance with the relevant noise criteria, these measures are to be approved by Council before implementation.

 

2.84   The loading dock shall be restricted to the following hours only: -

           

            7:00am to 10:00pm -  Monday to Saturday and

            8:00am to 8:00pm   -  Public Holidays and Sunday

           

            Any alterations to the above hours will require further consent from Penrith City Council.

 

3.     Delegated authority be provided to Council’s Development Services Manager to enable the issue of an operative Development Consent on receipt of satisfactory information as outlined in Schedule A of the Deferred Commencement Consent. 

4.     Persons who have made a submission be notified of Council’s decision.

 

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

 

For

Against

 

Councillor Kaylene Allison

 

Councillor Prue Guillaume

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Kath Presdee

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Tanya Davies

 

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM

 

 

17      Section 96 Application DA09/0221.01 for Modifications to a Proposed Community Facility at Lots 7, 8 and 9 DP 247158 (No. 46) Bringelly Road and Lots 5 and 6 DP 250412 (No. 49) First Street, Kingswood. Applicant: Mission Australia;  Owner: Mission Australia                                                                                                                      DA09/0221.01

285  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Section 96 Application DA09/0221.01 for Modifications to a Proposed Community Facility at Lots 7, 8 and 9 DP 247158 (No. 46) Bringelly Road and Lots 5 and 6 DP 250412 (No. 49) First Street, Kingswood be received.

2.     Section 96 Application DA09/0221.01 for Modifications to a Proposed Community Facility at Lots 7, 8 and 9 DP 247158 (No. 46) Bringelly Road and Lots 5 and 6 DP 250412 (No. 49) First Street, Kingswood be approved subject to the following amended and additional conditions:

Amend Condition 1 to read as follows:

2.1     The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the following plans stamped approved by Council, the application form, the BASIX Certificate and any supporting information received with the application, except as may be amended in red on the attached plans and by the following conditions.

Drawing Title

Drawing No.

Issue

Prepared By

Dated

Cover Sheet/Location Plan

2007-01-C001

C

4d Arch. & Design

12/02/10

Site/Roof Plan

2007-01-A001

D

4d Arch. & Design

12/02/10

Ground Floor Plan

2007-01-A002

D

4d Arch. & Design

12/02/10

First Floor Plan

2007-01-A003

D

4d Arch. & Design

12/02/10

Elevations

2007-01-A010

D

4d Arch. & Design

12/02/10

Sections

2007-01-A020

D

4d Arch. & Design

12/02/10

Site Analysis Plan

2007-01-A100

A

4d Arch. & Design

13/03/09

Shadow Diagrams

2007-01-A200

A

4d Arch. & Design

13/03/09

Shadow Diagrams

2007-01-A201

A

4d Arch. & Design

13/03/09

South-West Perspective (Photomontage)

2007-01-A300

A

4d Arch. & Design

13/03/09

External Play & Store Structures

2007-01-A400

A

4d Arch. & Design

24/04/09

Finishes Schedule

-

-

4d Arch. & Design

13/03/09

Landscape Site Plan

08/1373/DA1

A

Paul Scrivener

12/03/09

Landscape Elevations

08/1373/DA2

A

Paul Scrivener

12/03/09

Detail Planting Plan A

08/1373/DA3

A

Paul Scrivener

12/03/09

Detail Planting Plan B

08/1373/DA4

A

Paul Scrivener

12/03/09

Landscape Details & Notes

08/1373/DA5

A

Paul Scrivener

12/03/09

Stormwater Drainage Cover Sheet & Legend

0708-0040-C00

B

LHO Group

12/03/09

Stormwater Drainage Site Plan

0708-0040-C01

B

LHO Group

12/03/09

Stormwater Drainage Roof Plan

0708-0040-C02

B

LHO Group

12/03/09

Stormwater Drainage Details

0708-0040-C03

B

LHO Group

12/03/09

Sediment & Erosion Control Plan

0708-0040-C04

B

LHO Group

12/03/09

Waste Management Plan

-

-

4d Arch. & Design

12/03/09

Subdivision Plan 1

2007-01-SD001

A

4d Arch. & Design

12/02/10

Subdivision Plan 2

2007-01-SD002

A

4d Arch. & Design

12/02/10

                                      NOTE: The landscape plans and stormwater drainage plans shall be                      amended to reflect the site layout on the approved site plan.

Amend Condition 28 to read as follows:

2.2     The residential units in the Family Accommodation Centre shall only be used for short to medium-term accommodation of families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. Should it be intended to use or sell the residential units as private long-term tenancies as part of a future Development Application, Council will at this time levy for the payment of any applicable Section 94 contributions. Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, a positive covenant in these terms shall be registered on the land title of proposed Lot 2 in accordance with Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919.

 

Amend Condition 68 to read as follows:

2.3     An Engineering Construction Certificate for the provision of engineering works for the on-site detention systems is to be approved by the Certifying Authority. Engineering design drawings are to be prepared strictly in accordance with Penrith Development Control Plan 2006, Part 2.3 Engineering Works, and the Guidelines for Engineering Works for Subdivisions and Developments, Part 1 - Design.

Add new Condition 70A as follows:

2.4     Where the disposal of drainage involves the provision of drains across lot boundaries, drainage easements shall be provided. The width of the drainage easement is to be in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Engineering Works Development Control Plan and Guidelines for Engineering Works for Subdivisions and Developments, Part 1 – Design and Part 2 – Construction.

                   The easement shall be registered with the Land and Property                       Information Division of the Department of Lands prior to the issue of                    an Occupation Certificate. A copy of the registered easement for              drainage is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority and Penrith                  City Council, if Council is not the Certifying Authority.

Amend Condition 71 to read as follows:

2.5     On-site detention systems shall be provided on each lot to restrict stormwater discharges from each site to pre-development flows. The systems are to provide for all storms up to and including the 1% AEP event. In addition, positive covenants shall be registered on each lot for the on-site detention systems before an Occupation Certificate is issued for the development.

                   Engineering details and supporting calculations for the on-site                       detention systems are to be prepared by a qualified                                           Hydrologic/Hydraulic Engineer and are to accompany the                                     Construction Certificate application for the development in the form            of an Engineering Construction Certificate.

                                      {Note: If Penrith City Council is the Certifying Authority for the                                       Construction Certificate for the entire development on the site, the                                  Construction Certificate application fee shall include the fee for the                                 On-Site Detention System.}

                                      On-site detention system levels are critical and should be carefully                                   checked prior to construction to ensure they are built in accordance                                with approved plans and will have the required volume of storage.

                                      Submission of WAE plans

                                      On completion of the on-site detention systems, Works-As-Executed                                       (WAE) plans, prepared by a registered surveyor or the design                                        engineer, are to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. If                                Penrith City Council is not the Principal Certifying Authority, a copy                               of the WAE plans is to be submitted to Council prior to occupation.                                The WAE plans are to be certified by the designer of the system and                              are to clearly make reference to:

§ the works having been constructed in accordance with the approved plans, and

§ the actual storage volumes and orifice sizes provided, and

§ any variation to the approved design and required remedial works, and

§ the anticipated performance of the system with regard to the design intent.

                                      Registration of Positive Covenant

                          Before an Occupation Certificate is issued for the development,                                      positive covenants shall be registered on each property for the on-site                             detention systems in the following terms…

Amend Condition 79 to read as follows:

2.6     The blind aisle for the residential garages shall be amended to include a 1m extension for turning manoeuvres in accordance with the requirements of AS 2890.1. Single garages within each lot shall comply with Penrith Development Control Plan 2006 for full door opening (i.e. 3.2m x 5.4m).

Add new Condition 89A as follows:

2.7     Prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate, the original linen plan of subdivision and ten (10) copies shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

                   All necessary easements, restrictions and covenants shall be included           on the linen plan and accompanying 88B Instrument.

                   All dedications of roads/drainage are to be undertaken at no cost to             Penrith City Council.

                   The following information is to be shown on one (1) copy of the plan.

·      The location of all buildings and/or other permanent improvements shall comply with any statutory boundary clearances or setbacks as defined by the Building Code of Australia and Council’s resolutions.

·      All existing services are wholly contained within the lot served and/or covered by an appropriate easement.

Add new Condition 89B as follows:

2.8     Prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate, an 88B Instrument in accordance with Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority with the linen plan of subdivision. The 88B Instrument shall address all necessary easements, restrictions and covenants.

                   Where appropriate, Council shall be nominated as the only authority            permitted to modify, vary or rescind relevant easements, restrictions             and covenants.

Add new Condition 89C as follows:

2.9     Prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate, the following service authority clearances shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority:

·      A Section 73 Compliance Certificate from Sydney Water under the Sydney Water Act 1994;

·      A letter from Integral Energy stating that satisfactory arrangements have been made for electricity supply to all proposed allotments in the subdivision, including any necessary easements; and

·      A letter from an approved telecommunications service provider that satisfactory arrangements have been made for underground telephone services to all proposed allotments in the subdivision, including any necessary easements.

Add new Condition 89D as follows:

2.10   A Subdivision Certificate is to be obtained prior to the release of the linen plan of subdivision. The Subdivision Certificate will not be issued if any relevant conditions in this consent are outstanding.

Amend Condition 93 to read as follows:

2.11   The commitments listed in the BASIX Certificate for the dwellings (Certificate No. 236929M_02, dated 24/3/10), and forming part of the development consent, are to be implemented and maintained during the life of the dwellings. Where the commitments require replacement, the replacement must be identical to or at a higher star rating to that listed in the BASIX Certificate.

3.     The individual who made a submission be advised of Council’s decision and of the consideration given to their concerns.

 

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

 

For

Against

 

Councillor Kaylene Allison

 

Councillor Prue Guillaume

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Kath Presdee

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM

 

 

Councillors Tanya Davies and Mark Davies abstained from voting on this matter.

 

 

 

 

18      Development Application DA10/0667 - Proposed Music Event to be held 18 September 2010 and annually for a five (5) year period - Sydney International Regatta Centre - Lot 21 DP 1092147 (No. 152-233) Old Castlereagh Road, Castlereagh. Applicant: Q-Dance Australia;  Owner: Department of Planning                                                                      DA10/0667

286  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ben Goldfinch seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

    That:

1.   The information contained in the report on Development Application DA10/0667 - Proposed Music Event to be held 18 September 2010 and annually for a five (5) year period - Sydney International Regatta Centre - Lot 21 DP 1092147 (No. 152-233) Old Castlereagh Road, Castlereagh is received.

2.   Development Application 10/0667 seeking consent for a Music Event to be held on 18 September 2010 and annually for a five (5) year period at Development Application DA10/0667 - Proposed Music Event to be held 18 September 2010 and annually for a five (5) year period - Sydney International Regatta Centre - Lot 21 DP 1092147 (No. 152-233) Old Castlereagh Road, Castlereagh be approved subject to the following conditions:

2.1       The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the stamped-approved plans issued by Penrith City Council, the application form  and any supporting information received with the application, except as may be amended in red on the attached plans and by the following conditions.

2.2       This consent permits the running of a one day annual music event to be held in September for a period of five (5) years. This consent is limited to a period of 5 years from the date to which the consent operates.  Should the applicant wish to continue beyond this number, a separate application for development approval, demonstrating compliance with all conditions of this consent, must be lodged, and approval obtained, prior to operation.

2.3       At least sixty (60) days prior to the event occurring on an annual basis updated and site plans, management plans, structural certificates and other supporting documentation are to be submitted for Council’s consideration.

2.4       All entertainment and trading including the operation of a PA and speaker system is to cease at 11:00pm on the day of the event (to allow background noise levels to be achieved prior to midnight).

2.5       The development shall comply with the provisions of the Building Code of Australia at all times, with respect to smoke and flame index of materials, emergency lighting, exit signs and fire fighting facilities.

2.6        The development shall comply with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 at all times.

2.7        The event shall comply with all the requirements and undertakings given to and approved by the NSW Police.

2.8        Dust suppression and minimisation strategies must be employed to manage potential dust nuisances within the sites. This is to apply to parking areas, access roads and within the event site.

2.9       Event organisers will be available at a mutually convenient time, at the invitation of Penrith City Council and/or Penrith Police, to discuss and action agreed Community Safety or Security issues in conjunction with other local Penrith stakeholders should the need arise.

2.10     All emergency services and key agencies involved in providing services for this event should also be provided with a copy of the site plan at least two (2) weeks prior to the event. This includes local Police, Fire, Ambulance, Hospital and transport providers.

2.11     Access and sanitary facilities for persons with disabilities are to be provided and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia and AS 1428 “Design for Access and Mobility”.

2.12     The temporary tent structures and stages, when erected, are to fully comply with Part B1 and NSW Part H102 of Volume One of the Building Code of Australia. A Structural Engineer’s Certificate is to be submitted to Council prior to the event, certifying the structural adequacy of the structures.

2.13     Emergency lighting and illuminated exit signs shall be provided in the tent in accordance with Australian Standard AS 2293.1–2005, with certification submitted to Council prior to the event.

2.14     All electrical services shall comply with Clause NSWH102.14 of the Building Code of Australia with certification submitted to Council prior to the event.

2.15     The event structures are to be inspected by Penrith City Council at least 48 hours before the event operates for the public. Fees for the inspection are to be paid, as detailed in Penrith City Council’s Fees and Charges, and will be invoiced accordingly.

2.16     Further details of the Emergency Management Plan shall be submitted to Council prior to the event. The details are to include a list of the Wardens for the event, the chain of command and interaction with the emergency services who will be present for the event, and a sequence of events to detail the actions that would be taken in the event of an emergency.

2.17     The event shall be managed in accordance with the requirements of Schedule 3A - Places of Public Entertainment of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

2.18     Portable fire extinguishers shall be provided in all areas in accordance with Australian Standard AS 2444–2001, with certification submitted to Council prior to the event.

2.19     Two NSW Rural Fire Service Category 1 fire trucks are to be provided on the site, one at the eastern end and the other at the western end.

2.20     Access to the site for the NSW Fire Brigades is to be made available from the eastern end and from the western end of the site, to the satisfaction of the Brigades.

2.21     A sign is to be displayed in a prominent position in the tent that specifies the following:

            -     The maximum number of persons, as specified in the development consent, that are permitted in any part of the building used as a place of public entertainment;

            -     The name, address and telephone number of the council of the area in which the building is located.

Penrith City Council

Civic Centre

601 High Street

Penrith NSW 2750

PO Box 60

Penrith NSW 2751

(02) 4732 7777

2.22     Emergency vehicle access to the site through McCarthys Lane is maintained at all times.

2.23     Notification to the relevant bodies of any changes in current planned usage of pyrotechnics.

2.24     Notification to the relevant bodies of any changes to planned sphere of operations of the helicopter, including refuelling.

2.25     Bins are to be provided at Penrith Station and removed at the conclusion of the event. The area utilized by the event at Penrith Station is to be satisfactorily cleaned to that of pre-event conditions.

2.26     Appropriately places barriers are to be used to direct the pedestrians towards the bus entry point at Penrith Station.   

Transport Management

2.27     The Transport Management Plan for the class 2 event be endorsed subject to the event obtaining appropriate Roads and Traffic Authority and Police Approval, with subsequent Traffic Management Plans being resubmitted to the Local Traffic Committee a minimum of three months ahead of each annual event.

2.28     Sydney International Regatta Centre submit the Transport Management Plan for the event to the Roads and Traffic Authority for approval prior to the event.

2.29     The organisers submit a final Traffic Management Plan to Council, the Roads and Traffic Authority and Police for information purposes a minimum of six weeks prior to the event being held.

2.30     The organisers obtain separate Roads and Traffic Authority approval.

 

Infrastructure

2.31     Prior to the event commencing a performance bond is to be lodged with Penrith City Council annually for the existing pavement and associated civil infrastructure along the access road from the roundabout at Coreen Avenue to the development site.

2.32      The value of the bond is to be $5000 and will be administered in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Bond Policy.

2.33      Note:

2.34      Contact Council’s Development Engineering Unit on 4732 7777 for further information relating to bond requirements.

2.35     Prior to the event commencing a dilapidation report of all Council owned infrastructure along the access road from the roundabout at Coreen Avenue to the development site is to be submitted to Penrith City Council annually.  The report is to include, but not limited to, kerb and gutter, pavement, street trees, sign posts and any civil infrastructure associated with the access road.  The dilapidation report is to be undertaken in consultation with Penrith City Council.  Please telephone Council’s City Works Department on 4732 7777 to arrange an inspection prior to compilation of the dilapidation report.

2.36     Prior to the refund of the performance bond, any damage to Council infrastructure not identified in the dilapidation report, as a result of the development shall be restored under the supervision of Penrith City Council.  An inspection is to be undertaken by Penrith City Council’s City Works Department prior to commencement of restoration works.  Please telephone Council’s City Works Department on 4732 7777 to arrange an inspection.

Toilets

2.37     Temporary sanitary facilities shall be provided for the event, with the number of facilities in addition to the permanent facilities available in the buildings, determined in accordance with Table F2.3 of the Building Code of Australia.

2.38     The provisions of toilets to the event are to comply with Supplementary information from Anna Christie dated 9th August 2010.

2.39     An adequate supply of potable water must be supplied with respect to toilet, shower and refreshment facilities (non-potable water should not be used without prior approval).

2.40     Entrances to toilets should be well lit and clear of all screening to allow surveillance by the public, staff and security. This increases patrons’ sense of safety and decreases the likelihood of inappropriate activities occurring in the toilets (e.g. drug trafficking and use).

2.41     All toilets including portable toilets are required to be cleaned as appropriate.

2.42     Ensure that the effluent from the portable toilets is removed off the site to an appropriate facility to accept such waste. The waste shall be transported and disposed of by appropriately licensed facilities.

2.43     Portable toilets are to be provided at Penrith Station.

Noise

2.44     Noise levels from the premises shall not exceed the relevant noise criteria detailed Sound Management Investigation and Sound Management Plan 2010 Defqon 1 Festival – Issue E - prepared by Auditoria dated 06 August 2010. The recommendations provided in the above-mentioned acoustic report shall be implemented and incorporated into the design, construction and the conducting of the event. Prior to the event, a certificate is to be obtained from a qualified acoustic consultant certifying that the event has been designed and constructed to meet the noise criteria in accordance with the approved acoustic report. This certificate is to be submitted and approved by Council three (3) days prior to the event.

2.45     In addition to the noise monitoring positions outlined in section B.9.1 of the and Sound Management Plan 2010 Defqon 1 Festival – Issue E - prepared by Auditoria dated 06 August 2010, an additional noise monitoring position is to be located to the east of the site.

2.46     Sound limiter equipment is to be used for all sound amplification systems used as part of the event. The sound limiter equipment is to be set and locked by a qualified acoustic consultant at a level which ensures that the compliance criteria set in the Sound Management Plan 2010 Defqon 1 Festival – Issue E - prepared by Auditoria dated 06 August 2010 are met at all times.

2.47     Noise monitoring is not to cease until the end of the soft close period at 11pm.

2.48     Noise generated by the activity after 10pm is not to exceed the Sleep Disturbance Criteria provided in the Environmental Protection Authorities Industrial Noise Policy. In the event that the continuous noise monitoring detects any exceedance, the noise levels are to be reduced immediately.

2.49     A noise complaint hotline by the event organisers is to be made available to the surrounding area in case noise nuisance occurs. Any complaints are to be reported to the event manager and where necessary action is to be taken to resolve the noise nuisance. The event manager if so required by an authorised officer, the acoustic consultant or the NSW Police Force, must have the authority to order the reduction of noise level produced.

2.50     The services of a suitably qualified consultant is to be engaged to conduct noise testing during the event and provide an Event Acoustic Report to be submitted to Penrith City Council within sixty (60) days of the event.

2.51     The Event Acoustic Report is to comply with Australian Standard AS1055 Acoustics - Description of measurement of environmental noise, New South Wales Environment Protection Authority Industrial Noise Source Policy 2000 and the Sound Management Investigation and Provisional Sound Management Plan – prepared by Auditoria dated 11 August 2009.

2.52     Noise testing is to be conducted and included in the Event Acoustic Report provided to Penrith City Council at specified testing locations as outlined in Sound Management Plan 2010 Defqon 1 Festival – Issue E - prepared by Auditoria dated 06 August 2010.

2.53     Noise testing is to be conducted during the event at the receiver locations used to determine the Rating Background Levels for Mt Riverview, Yellow Rock, Cranebrook – Residential, Cranebrook – Rural, Waterside Estate, Emu Heights.

2.54     This monitoring is to be undertaken a minimum of twice during the daytime period and twice during the evening period at each of those locations. Daytime and Evening are periods as defined by the NSW Industrial Noise Policy. In addition the noise testing is to have consideration to Amenity and Intrusive Noise as defined in the Industrial Noise Policy.

2.55     Should the noise testing identify any amenity and/or intrusive noise related concerns, then these are to be communicated to the event organiser as soon as possible and immediate action must be taken to resolve these concerns. Details of this compliance noise testing and any concerns raised and action taken are to be included in the Event Acoustic Report.

2.56     The noise readings are to be measured at all points in accordance with the New South Wales Environment Protection Authority Industrial Noise Source Policy 2000 and Sound Management Investigation and Provisional Sound Management Plan – prepared by Auditoria dated 11 August 2009. The readings are to additionally comply with Australian Standard AS1055.2 Acoustics- Description of measurement of environmental noise.

Helicopter Flights

2.57     The Helicopter Flights are to be conducted over a period of no longer than specified hours of operation being within 10am and 5pm on the day of the event.

2.58     The Helicopter Flights are to undertaken in accordance in the letter from recommendations from HeliAust reference (Defqon1 18/9/10) received 6/9/10 and must comply with all the relevant Legislation and Australian Standards. Any changes to the approved flights are to be provided to Council for consideration.

Food Safety

2.59     To comply with Clause 4 of Food Safety Standards 3.2.2 each temporary food business is to notify food business details to the NSW Food Authority prior to the commencing any food handling operations.  This may be completed on the Food Authority website (www.foodauthority.nsw.gov.au)

2.60     To ensure that the temporary food business meet with the requirements of Food Safety Standards 3.2.2 and 3.2.3, the food stall operators are to comply with the requirements of the NSW Food Authority’s guidelines “Food Handling Guidelines for Temporary Events.”

2.61     All temporary food outlets must complete and return Council’s “Application to Sell Food” form at least 48 hours prior to operating.

2.62     Solid and liquid waste storage and disposal must be carried out in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.

2.63     Food premises, stalls or food vending vehicles must have hand washing facilities supplied with warm water, with liquid soap and paper towel.  Potable water must be used for hand washing.

2.64     Food premises, stalls or food vending vehicles must have a temperature measuring device onsite that is capable of measuring to +/-1°C.

2.65     Food products are required to be stored in vermin and insect proof storage areas. All foods are to be protected and covered.

Safety and Security

2.66     The final Crowd Management Plan is to be provided to Council prior to the event.

2.67     During bump in and bump out periods that occur prior to and following the event, the applicant should ensure all equipment and staging materials are appropriately secured to reduce opportunities for malicious damage and theft.

2.68     The applicant must provide a combination of security personnel and paid Policing for the duration of the event. This includes 365 security guards on the island, in addition to the development of a security and crowd management plan for the Penrith Bus Interchanges and adjoining precincts.

Drug and Alcohol Management

2.69     ‘Sniffer dogs’ should be provided as proposed to assist in drug detection at the event. Training should also be provided for security and event staff to assist in the detection of drug-induced intoxication.

2.70     The guidelines contained in the Alcohol Management Plan must be adhered to by security and event staff to promote responsible consumption of alcohol and minimise opportunities for alcohol-related antisocial behaviour to occur.

2.71     Security personnel must be provided at each bar area for crowd control and to monitor intoxicated persons and minimise alcohol-related antisocial behaviour.

2.72     Glass containers must not be permitted, with plastic containers or cans to be used instead. All cans must be opened at the bar.

2.73     Eskies shall not be permitted into the event.

2.74     Bags shall be searched upon entry in accordance with the ‘Entry Patron Search’ procedures provided by the applicant.

2.75     Alcohol must not be brought in to the event, but must only be purchased on site from the licensed vendors.

2.76     Bar areas must comply with all RSA and legislative requirements concerning the sale and service of alcohol.

2.77     Free water must be provided at all bar areas and bottle refilling stations.

2.78     All staff must be RSA trained and all appropriate lighting signage must be displayed at all bar areas.

Crowd Management

2.79     The Crowd Control procedures provided in the Security Management Plan must be adhered to by security and event staff throughout the event.

2.80     Event organisers must be able to communicate with the crowd both for public announcements and in emergencies.

Major and Medical Incidents

2.81     The ‘Medical Major Incident Plan’ and ‘Medical Plan’ provided by the applicant must be followed by all event staff. Training should be provided to staff to ensure they are familiar with the plans and steps that should be followed in the event of an incident or emergency. 

2.82     Records should be kept of all incidents at the event, and should include details such as the date, location and time of incident, description of incident, contact details of person involved, and action taken. 

Emergency Response Plan

2.83     The ‘Emergency Response Plan’ provided by the applicant must be followed by all event staff and as indicated, circulated to key emergency services for comment. In addition to the plan, a scenario planning workshop has been scheduled and should be conducted annually prior to the event. It will provide an opportunity to consider logistics and the interplay of various operational teams – security, medical, event management, traffic and the police.

Temporary Fencing

2.84     Temporary fencing around the perimeter of the lake edge should be staffed by security personnel, as proposed by the applicant, to minimise the risk of people entering or throwing objects into the water.

2.85     If security gates are proposed to control access, emergency service providers such as Police, Fire Brigade and Ambulance will need to be liaised with to ensure they can gain access.

2.86     Fencing design should maximise natural surveillance to reduce the likelihood of crime being committed.

Lighting and Power

2.87     Lighting is to be provided within the car park at Penrith Station for the duration of the event.

2.88     Lighting should be provided to clearly illuminate entry and exit points, food stalls, toilets, first aid areas and stages.

2.89     Generators should be installed to provide light in a power outage and to power the public address system. The latter may permit directions to be given to spectators in a power failure, thereby alleviating panic.

2.90     Access to the main lighting or house lights is essential in case of an emergency. The location of the controls for these lights, and the operation of the controls, must be known to those on-site responsible for emergencies.

2.91     A team of certified electricians must be available on-site for the event.

2.92     Adequate lighting is provided so as to enable Police, Security and

2.93     Medical staff to monitor activities and respond where required during the event.

Signage

2.94     Clear signage should be displayed throughout the event to clearly indicate entry/exit points, public transport locations, emergency help points, toilets, first aid, stage locations, telephones, vendors and licensed/non-licensed areas.

2.95     All signage associated with the event shall be removed upon completion of the event.

3.     Those persons who have made a submission be advised of the determination.

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

 

For

Against

 

Councillor Kaylene Allison

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM

Councillor Prue Guillaume

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Kath Presdee

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Tanya Davies

 

 

 

 

 

REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch left the meeting, the time being 9:32 pm.

 

RR 1          Bus Shelter - Mulgoa Road & Fairlight Road, Mulgoa                                         

Councillor Tanya Davies requested a report to the Local Traffic Committee investigating the location of a bus shelter at the corner of Mulgoa and Fairlight Roads, Mulgoa, as there are concerns about the shelter being situated in a less than safe location.  Councillor Davies also requested that an onsite meeting be held with Council officers, residents and herself at approximately 8.20 am to view the situation.

 

RR 2          Access to Penrith Mazda site from Mulgoa Road, Penrith                                    

Councillor Greg Davies requested an update on a previously requested report on reasons for allowing access to the Penrith Mazda site on Mulgoa Road, Penrith.

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch returned to the meeting, the time being 9:34 pm.

 

RR 3          Wireless Towers – Internet Broadband Access                                                      

Councillor Prue Guillaume requested a report to Council investigating how many wireless towers may have to be built in the Penrith LGA, to accommodate internet broadband access, if the Coalition wins the Federal Election on 21 August 2010, and who would act as the consent authority for such development.

 

 

URGENT BUSINESS

 

UB 1           Leave of Absence                                                                                                     

Councillor Karen McKeown requested Leave of Absence for the period 17 August 2010 to 21 September 2010 inclusive.

 

287  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as an urgent matter.

 

The Mayor, Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.

 

 

288  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that Leave of Absence be granted to Councillor Karen McKeown for the period 17 August 2010 to 21 September 2010 inclusive.

 

 

 

 

 

 

UB 2           Leave of Absence                                                                                                     

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM requested Leave of Absence for the period 3 September 2010 to 21 September 2010 inclusive.

 

289  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor John Thain that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as an urgent matter.

 

The Mayor, Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.

 

 

290  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor John Thain that Leave of Absence be granted to Councillor Ross Fowler OAM for the period 3 September 2010 to 21 September 2010 inclusive.

 

 

UB 3           Passing of Ruth Hutchens and Sister Mary Louise’s mother                                

Councillor Jackie Greenow advised the meeting of the passing of Ruth Hutchens and Sister Mary Louise’s mother and requested that letters of condolence from the Mayor be sent to their families.

 

UB 4           Fundraising Event for Guide Dogs Society                                                             

Councillor Jackie Greenow requested that an amount of $550  be allocated, in equal amounts from each Ward’s voted works to cover the cost of hiring the St Marys Memorial Hall for the fundraising dance for the Guide Dogs Society to be held on 10 September 2010.

 

291  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as an urgent matter.

 

The Mayor, Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.

 

292  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that an amount of $550 be allocated, in equal amounts from each Ward’s voted works to cover the cost of hiring the St Marys Memorial Hall for the fundraising dance for the Guide Dogs Society to be held on 10 September 2010.

 

 

UB 5           Fundraising Event - Penrith Carer Car                                                                    

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM requested that an amount of $1,000 be allocated, in equal amounts from each Ward’s voted works to cover the cost of a table of 8 at the Rotary Club of Nepean’s fundraising event for the Penrith Carer Car, to be held at Penrith Paceway on 28 October 2010.

 

293  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as an urgent matter.

 

The Mayor, Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.

 

294  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that an amount of $1,000 be allocated, in equal amounts from each Ward’s voted works to cover the cost of a table of 8 at the Rotary Club of Nepean’s fundraising event for the Penrith Carer Car, o be held at Penrith Paceway on 28 October 2010.

 

 

UB 6           Letter of Condolence – Bill Ball                                                                               

Councillor Greg Davies advised the meeting of the passing of Bill Ball and requested that a letter of condolence from the Mayor be sent to his family.

 

 

Committee of the Whole

 

295  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Mark Davies seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the meeting adjourn to the Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters, the time being 9:42 pm

 

Councillor Prue Guillaume left the meeting, the time being 9:42 pm and did not return.

 

1        Presence of the Public

 

CW1 RESOLVED on the motion of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM  that the press and public be excluded from Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters:

 

 

A Leading City

 

2        Commercial Matter - Sale of Lemongrove Gardens Hostel and Lemongrove Retirement Village                                                                                                                                 

 

This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

 

 

 

 

 

 

3        Legal Matter - Permanent Road Closures of Malabine, Nardu & Baronesa Lanes, South Penrith to Adjoining Owners                                                                                              

 

This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, prejudice the maintenance of law and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

 

 

The meeting resumed at 9:54 pm and the General Manager reported that the Committee of the Whole met at 9:42 pm on 16 August 2010, the following being present

 

His Worship the Mayor Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM, Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Tanya Davies, Ross Fowler OAM, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow, Karen McKeown, Kath Presdee and John Thain

 

and the Committee of the Whole excluded the press and public from the meeting for the reasons set out in CW1 and that the Committee of the Whole submitted the following recommendations to Council.

 

 

 

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS

 

2        Commercial Matter - Sale of Lemongrove Gardens Hostel and Lemongrove Retirement Village                                                                                                                                 

RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

CW2 That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Commercial Matter - Sale of Lemongrove Gardens Hostel and Lemongrove Retirement Village be received.

2.     Council agree to the sale in accordance with the figures and conditions as outlined in the report.

3.     The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all the necessary documentation.

 

 

3        Legal Matter - Permanent Road Closures of Malabine, Nardu & Baronesa Lanes, South Penrith to Adjoining Owners                                                                                              

RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Kath Presdee

CW3 That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Legal Matter - Permanent Road Closures of Malabine, Nardu & Baronesa Lanes, South Penrith to Adjoining Owners be received.

2.     Council approve the sale of land to the adjoining owners of Malabine, Nardu & Baronesa Lanes South Penrith as outlined in the table contained within the report.

3.     Council finalise the permanent road closures of Malabine, Nardu & Baronesa Lanes, South Penrith.

4.     The Common Seal of the City of Penrith be placed on all necessary documentation.

 

 

ADOPTION OF Committee of the Whole

 

296  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Tanya Davies that the recommendation contained in the Committee of the Whole and shown as CW1, CW2 and CW3 be adopted.

 

 

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9:54 pm.

 

 

 

 

 



PENRITH CITY COUNCIL

 

Procedure for Addressing Meetings

 

Anyone can request permission to address a meeting, providing that the number of speakers is limited to three in support of any proposal and three against.

 

Any request about an issue or matter on the Agenda for the meeting can be lodged with the General Manager or Public Officer up until 12 noon on the day of the meeting.

 

Prior to the meeting the person who has requested permission to address the meeting will need to provide the Public Officer with a written statement of the points to be covered during the address in sufficient detail so as to inform the Councillors of the substance of the address and a written copy of any questions to be asked of the Council in order that responses to those questions can be provided in due course.

 

In addition, prior to addressing the meeting a person addressing Council or Committee will be informed that they do not enjoy any privilege and that permission to speak may be withdrawn should they make inappropriate comments.

 

It should be noted that persons who wish to address the Council are addressing a formal part of the Council Meeting. All persons addressing the Meeting should give consideration to their dress attire. Smart casual is a minimum that is thought to be appropriate when addressing such a forum.

 

It should be noted that speakers at meetings of the Council or Committee do not have absolute privilege (parliamentary privilege).  A speaker who makes any potentially offensive or defamatory remarks about any other person may render themselves open to legal action.

 

Prior to addressing the meeting the person will be required to sign the following statement:

 

“I (name) understand that the meeting I intend to address on (date) is a public meeting.  I also understand that should I say or present any material that is inappropriate, I may be subject to legal action.  I also acknowledge that I have been informed to obtain my own legal advice about the appropriateness of the material that I intend to present at the above mentioned meeting”.

 

Should a person fail to sign the above statement then permission to address either the Council or Committee will not be granted.

 

The Public Officer or Minute Clerk will speak to those people who have requested permission to address the meeting, prior to the meeting at 7.15pm.

 

It is up to the Council or Committee to decide if the request to address the meeting will be granted.

 

Where permission is to be granted the Council or Committee, at the appropriate time, will suspend only so much of the Standing Orders to allow the address to occur.

 

The Chairperson will then call the person up to the lectern or speaking area.

 

The person addressing the meeting needs to clearly indicate:

 

·     Their name;

 

·     Organisation or group they are representing (if applicable);

 

·     Details of the issue to be addressed and the item number of the report in the Business Paper;

 

·     Whether they are opposing or supporting the issue or matter (if applicable) and the action they would like the meeting to take;

 

·           The interest of the speaker (e.g. affected person, neighbour, applicant,        applicants spokesperson, interested citizen etc).

 

Each person then has five minutes to make their address.  Those addressing Council will be required to speak to the written statement they have submitted.  Permission to address Council is not to be taken as an opportunity to refute or otherwise the points made by previous speakers on the same issue. 

 

The Council or Committee can extend this time if they consider if appropriate, however, everyone needs to work on the basis that the address will be for five minutes only.

 

Councillors may have questions about the address so people are asked to remain at the lectern or in the speaking area until the Chairperson has thanked them.

 

When this occurs, they should then return to their seat.

 

Glenn McCarthy

Public Officer

02 4732 7649                                                       


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


Mayoral Minutes

 

Item                                                                                                                                       Page

 

1        St Marys Children's Centre wins Business Award 2010

 

2        Ripples St Marys Leisure Centre wins Business Award 2010

 

 



Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A City of Opportunities

 

Mayoral Minute

St Marys Children's Centre wins Business Award 2010

Strategic Objective: A City with equitable access to services and facilities (7)

           

 

I am pleased to advise that St Marys Children’s Centre recently won their category of most outstanding Childcare Centre at the Mt Druitt St Marys Business Awards.

 

St Marys Children’s Centre offers Occasional Care for children aged 0-5 years and a Preschool program for 3 to 6 year olds. Over 100 local children are enrolled in the service and the centre is fortunate to have the support of a strong parent body. The centre is proud of the contemporary curriculum it provides which is based on the National Early Years Learning Framework. The centre has been operating for over 30 years during which time it has developed a reputation in the local St Marys community for providing quality care and education.

 

I would like to congratulate Natalie van Twest and the St Marys Children’s Centre team for achieving this outstanding result. I would also like to acknowledge the Children’s Services Department and the Penrith City Children’s Services Cooperative which manage children’s services on Council’s behalf for the leadership and business management which supports St Marys Children’s Centre.

 

 

 

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM

Mayor

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the Mayoral Minute on St Marys Children's Centre wins Business Award 2010 be received.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Liveable City

 

Mayoral Minute

Ripples St Marys Leisure Centre wins Business Award 2010

Strategic Objective: A City with active and healthy communities (19)

           

 

Ripples St Marys Leisure Centre has been presented with a 2010 Mt Druitt St Marys Local Business Award. The centre won the Health and Fitness Centre Award category and received the award on Wednesday, 1 September.

 

The centre was nominated by its customers, and had to undertake quite an involved process providing detailed information about how they operated their business and plans for the future. Mystery shoppers were also used to verify the high level of service.


Ripples, which has been operating for 16 years, is a multi-purpose facility including indoor and outdoor pools, a hydrotherapy centre, gym, group fitness, specialised care, parties, a café and crèche. It is a one-stop shop and promoted heavily through ‘word of mouth’. Over the past two years about $2m was invested in maintenance and revamping the centre. Each year about half a million customers visit Ripples. The centre also supports the local community through a new fundraising program.

 

I would like to congratulate Erik Henricksen, Ripples’ General Manager, his staff and the board of management for this superb facility and great service. The centre is a fantastic asset for Penrith City and has appeal far beyond just our local government area.

 

 

 

 

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM

Mayor

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the Mayoral Minute on Ripples St Marys Leisure Centre wins Business Award 2010 be received.

 

 

  


Reports of Committees

 

Item                                                                                                                                       Page

 

1        Report and Recommendations of the Waste Services Committee Meeting held on 15 July 2010

 

2        Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee Meeting held on 4 August 2010

 

3        Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 30 August 2010

 

 



Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Green City

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
 Waste Services Committee MEETING

HELD ON 15 July, 2010

 

 

 

PRESENT

His Worship the Mayor Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM, Councillor Greg Davies, community representatives John Kliese, Trevor Robey, Patricia Ryan and Andrew Wilcox

 

IN ATTENDANCE

 

Alan Stoneham – General Manager, Barry Husking – Director/Chief Financial Officer, David Burns – Group Manager, Brian Steffen – Group Manager Information & Customer Relations, Emma Whale – Communications Officer, Andrew Moore – Financial Services Manager and Amanda Morahan – Waste Education Officer.

 

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Leave of Absence was previously granted to Councillor Kath Presdee for the period 11 July 2010 to 15 July 2010 inclusive.

 

APOLOGIES

An apology from Councillor Tanya Davies was accepted.

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Waste Services Committee Meeting - 13 May 2010

The minutes of the Waste Services Committee Meeting of 13 May 2010 were confirmed.

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

There were no declarations of interest.

 

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

A Green City

 

1        Waste Management Services                                                                                            

The Council’s Group Manager – City Presentation, Mr David Burns introduced the Report and opened the meeting.

 

Patricia Ryan asked about the site visit to the SITA Facility at Kemps Creek. Amanda Morahan responded by saying that a booking has been tentatively made for Tuesday 27 July 2010 at 9am.  This will be confirmed by email to Committee members.

 

 

1.      Provision of an optional weekly 140L red lid residual waste bin service.

 

The provision of the optional weekly service commenced on 12 March 2010.  Requests for the weekly service has slowed down considerably with 8.4% of residents taking up this option and 4.3% opting for the larger fortnightly option instead.

 

Cr Davies asked if the change to weekly service was remaining at a stable rate.  Amanda Morahan responded that it was and that since the rate notices had gone out there has been about a dozen households changing back to the fortnightly 140L red lid bin service.

 

2.       Provision of Biodegradable bags

 

Council’s delivery contractor, PMP, completed the delivery of the initial 3 month supply of the biodegradable bags with some minor problems with the distribution.  PMP was unable to deliver to all households, and as such 1,985 bags were posted out at a cost of $5160.00.

 

Issues arising include:

 

·    To date, 301 households (0.6%) phoned to get the bags as they were not delivered to them and out of these 170 bags were posted at a cost of $448.00.

·    Some residents have noted that the bags were too small for the kitchen tidy bin – (the bags were passed around the table so that the committee could see the size difference in the current bag and the bags that will be delivered over the next twelve months, commencing in September.)

·    Shrinkage when fitted to the kitchen tidy bin

·    Bag collapses in the kitchen tidy bin

·    Insufficient number of bags delivered (three bags per week)

 

John Kliese enquired if the bags would be increased in number to residents in the warmer weather.  David Burns advised that when the new supply of bags is delivered, residents will be provided with 80 bag packs each quarter.

 

Andrew Wilcox enquired if the sample was of the thicker bag. David Burns responded that after the evaluation panel tested the two strengths, there was no notable difference in the bags and the bags to be supplied will be 18mm thick.

 

Tender for Supply and Distribution of Bio Degradable Bags.

 

Tenders for an additional 12 months supply of biodegradable bags are currently being considered and will be reported to Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 19 July 2010.

 

David Burns advised that the preferred tender for supply is Because We Care Pty Ltd, and distribution by PMP Limited.  He also explained that it may be 6-8 weeks for the manufacturer to produce the order and to provide certification for the bags to pass the Worm Toxicity Test. In this time the Council will negotiate the distribution process. The initial cost of these bags is $972,000 for supply and $90,000 for distribution.

 

Supplies of additional bags are being provided to residents who have run out of bags previously distributed, through Libraries and Council offices.

 

Barry Husking advised that a true figure of the cost of supply and distribution of the bags could be done by a further report to the committee at a later stage.

 

John Kliese asked if there was an opportunity for outside retailers to sell the bags to residents after the initial 12 month supply by Council.

 

David Burns replied saying at this stage the only bags available for use will be through Council and this is due to the fact that SITA at this stage only recognise the colour and print on the bags at their SAWT facility and have added additional labour to the facility to manage these bags.  He has also looked into the Target bags and even if they do comply with the worm toxicity test and AS 4736, at this stage should only be used in the red bin, because they cannot be identified at the SAWT facility and they are of a large size. There is potential for the supplies of Council’s approved bag, or other suppliers to market the bags through local retailers.

 

3.       Reviewing the Design of Bin Lids

 

David Burns reported that McGregor Environmental Services were engaged to conduct an audit on the condition of the red and green lidsThe red-lidded residual bins were new, whereas the old garbage bins were retro-fitted with green lids.

 

A random sample of 300 residual bins and 2000 organics bins was conducted.  The audit was conducted over a four day period and needed to address the issue of whether the bin lid seal was compromised, resulting in fly strike.

 

The audit identified five different brands of bins, including Schaefer, Waste Master with the most common being the Sulo brand where the retro-fitting of lids was performed. There were no issues with the red-lidded bins and the lids sealed properly.  The green lidded organics bin lids produced a 5.2 percentage of bins in a condition that could potentially increase fly strike.

 

Funding is available in this financial year to replace damaged Schaefer and Waste Master bins.

 

Trevor Robey asked what do residents have to do to get a bin replaced.  Amanda Morahan responded they call the Waste Hotline number and bins should be replaced within a week.

 

4.       Odour Control and the use of suitable insecticide products

 

David Burns advised the committee that Bin Kill is being used by Lismore City Council.  Council had a toxicology report done by a toxicologist from the University of Western Sydney and detailed the dangers of the Bin Kill product.

 

The toxicology report noted that if Council were to endorse this product there would be a list of recommendations relating to the product that would need to be provided. The product is currently readily available for purchase from retailers.

 

 It was therefore determined that Council should not promote this product.

 

 

 

5.       Extra Services at Christmas time.

 

David Burns advised the committee that discussions have taken place with both contractors, SITA and Visy, and suggestions have been made on ways that additional services could be provided during the Christmas period.

 

There is potential for both the garbage and recycling collection contractors to provide additional bin collections for residual waste and recyclables during the week after Christmas Day.  The following issues need to be taken into consideration:

 

·    The majority of residual waste collections and recycling collection services are performed fortnightly and in order to give everyone the opportunity to receive the benefit of an additional service it will need to be performed over two weeks in the “off” week period only.  This would mean, however, that the additional collection for some residents would not occur until the week after Christmas.

 

·    The contractors have two options logistically that need to be considered to perform this service.  Once the normal service has been completed the entire fleet would then be utilised to perform services for those residents in the “off” week of the fortnightly program.  This would require the service to be performed outside the hours nominated under the contract. 

 

·    Drivers who have completed one shift would not be permitted to perform another (due to occupational health and safety issues); therefore, additional staff would have to be sourced and trained to carry out this work. 

 

·    The disposal of waste and recyclables may be an issue, given that the disposal facilities may not be open during the time of the second shift.  Both garbage and recycling trucks perform around two to three loads per shift. 

 

·    A rough estimate on the cost to perform the additional services would be based on double the weekly transport and disposal costs.  The total transport cost is estimated to be approximately $90,000 and a disposal cost of around $80,000, depending on the amount of waste generated.

 

·    To save on costs, a reduced number of vehicles could be utilised to perform the double-shift program, this depends on the number of residents participating in the service.

 

Andrew Moore noted that the cost of this would cost approximately $3.50-$4.00, which would need to be added to the domestic waste charge next financial year. This financial year would have to be covered by the waste reserve.

 

Drop Off Centres

 

At least two drop off centres would need to be provided, ideally one in Penrith and the other in St Marys.

 

Use of large bulk bins would be required to receive waste.

 

Each site would need to be secure and provided with 24 hour monitoring to control incidents of illegal dumping, and would need to be strategically located and controlled, taking into consideration, traffic, noise, odour and occupational health and safety issues. Residents would also have to separate their waste and have separate collection points in the drop off centre for the collection of the three streams of waste.

 

Cr Davies commented that the drop off centres may result in dumping by residents and preferred to have the extra pickups at a small cost to residents.

 

Patricia Ryan commented that they would probably need to run the drop off service over a one month period over Christmas, and the need to look at the cost effectiveness of both options.

 

To look at either of these proposals the contractors would need four to six months lead time in order to source additional plant and labour. 

 

A motion was put forward by Trevor Robey to liaise with contractors to put these options in place as soon as possible. 

 

6.         Investigate options for the collection of medical, e-waste and foam packing.

 

On 5 November 2009 the Federal Government released its National Waste Policy.  Some key elements of the Policy include product stewardship and development of a National Waste Report.

 

Governments have agreed that televisions and computers will be the first products to be covered under the co-regulatory arm of the framework legislation with householders able to drop off used televisions and computers for recycling free of charge at designated drop of centres. 

 

The framework legislation and the television and computer product stewardship arrangements are expected to be operational in 2011. David Burns recommended that Council’s policy be modelled on this framework.

 

Some Councils have initiated their own collection programs for e-waste.  Baulkham Hills, for example, has conducted four programs where residents can drop off their unwanted televisions and computers (e-waste) and these programs have been conducted at an approximate cost of $20,000 to $30,000 per event.  Baulkham Hills advise that up to 95% of the e-waste recovered was recycled.

 

John Kliese commented that it cost Blacktown $1000 per tonne and that last year they collected 44 tonnes.

 

Alan Stoneham commented that some retailers like Harvey Norman and Bing Lee ran a promotion to take old TVs and they received 40 pallet loads. Utilising a national e-waste scheme will see the cost borne by the manufacturers instead of Penrith City Council.

 

 

 

 

7.       Communications and education program for the community.

 

Advertising

 

Brian Steffen commented on communication and advertising over the last three months.  He said that the advertising was themed as follows:

 

May Contamination

          “Let’s Kick Goals”

Contamination focus – what goes in your green-lidded bin?

Bin Audit – Green Organics Bin

Media Releases

 

June Bio Degradable Bags

                   “How to Use Your Kitchen Organics Bags”

 

July Green Bin - Organics

                   “Leave Your Green Bin Out Weekly”

 

Brian Steffen advised the communications department have organised Media Releases about the progress Council was making as well as other events such as the ACT Minister’s visit to Penrith Council. Brian Steffen also advised of information for residents being promoted in Mayoral columns and also internally to staff through updates from the General Manager to all staff by email.

 

The communications department will continue to promote the three bin service and positively reinforce residents with their efforts in the opportunities that arise. 

 

Shopping Centre Visits and Community Events

 

Amanda Morahan discussed the progress she has made visiting schools and community events.

 

Education activities at major shopping centres within the City - enquiries about waste service options have decreased, as have issues associated with the biodegradable bags.  The reduction in the number of enquiries from the community about waste service options and biodegradable bags is also supported through the number of enquiries being received at Council.  Public reaction has swung from some outrage and high dissatisfaction to indifference and satisfaction with their waste service.

 

More focus on delivering information to the community will be done through events and festivals in the coming months, including St Marys Spring Festival and other community events.  Community activities will be conducted during August and September to coincide with the next delivery of biodegradable bags.

 

School Education programmes – Keep Australia Beautiful were engaged in visits to 18 local primary schools in the local area and have run their Waste Watchers program with 1755 local primary school students.

 

School students were educated on issues associated with sorting their waste correctly into the three bin system, in addition to other waste education issues.

 

SITA and Council’s education staff have visited 5 after school childcare centres, 3 preschools and 2 school groups have attended SITA Education Centre for SAWT tours.

 

There has been a shift in the enquiries received by the public attitude from dissatisfaction and angry to satisfied and willing to give the 3 bin system a go.

 

Public are generally happy with the biodegradable bags and phone calls have decreased to the Waste Area. 

 

Patricia Ryan congratulated Amanda Morahan on an excellent job.

 

Brian Steffen said he is getting an assistant in advertising to review information and market research and is hoping to do a phone survey to see if there are any gaps in the three bin system.   Brian Steffen is also looking at doing this soon as it is 12 months since the three bin service was introduced.

 

Patricia Ryan suggested to hold of until the summer months.  Brian Steffen responded that this will be done late August early September.

 

Barry Husking said that this is done to gauge an understanding of the public reaction and awareness to the three bin service, and build on this in the lead in to the summer months.

 

Clr Greg Davies suggested that when the Mayor is out and about that he should be aware of what is happening with the organic material that has been used and where it is to be used next to promote himself and Council.

 

7.       Contamination Management

 

Organics Bin

 

The contamination management program involves the kerbside inspection of organics bins to identify whether the wrong material is being placed in these bins.  This was conducted over 20 different areas – one per day, five per week. Bins are inspected three times over a 12 week period.  When a bin is identified to have contaminated material a sticker is left on the bin and a letter is provided to the resident advising them of the contamination.  This process is conducted again in 4 weeks time and if contaminated another sticker is placed on the bin and a letter explaining the contamination is left in the letterbox. On the third time if the bin is still contaminated the bin is not emptied until the resident removes the contaminated material.

 

Stage 3 of this program commenced on Monday, 28 June 2010, with encouraging results.  In the first four weeks of the program 1,919 bins were stickered. To date in Stage 3 of the program, only 42 bins have not been emptied due to contamination.

 

The contamination management program to this stage has only covered part of the City area in areas considered to have higher contamination rates.

 

SITA has advised that from visual examination of the organics processed at the SAWT facility there would appear to be no significant change in contamination.  This, however, may be deceiving given the reduced volume of garden organics being produced at this time of the year. 

 

SITA, however, intend to conduct an audit of the organics in the coming few weeks to determine the contamination level.

 

Trevor Robey asked what happens if the bin is not emptied.

 

Amanda Morahan stated that the resident will need to remove the contamination and call the Waste Hotline to have the bin collected. If they do not do this and the bin remains at the kerbside, Council will work through the contamination and bin issues on a case by case basis to achieve a solution.

 

Clr Greg Davies suggested a cost to resident for not doing the right thing be approximately

$10-00.

 

Residual Waste Bin

 

David Burns reported that the current negotiations with WSN to build an AWT facility in Seven Hills is unlikely to proceed. WSN agreed to provide tipping fees at Eastern Creek at rates less than the full rate.  These rates, however, will increase over the next three years until they reach the full rate.  Council legal advice has been that we cannot accept this offer and continue this relationship.

 

Therefore, Wright Corporate Strategy has been engaged to develop tender documents for the processing, treatment and/or disposal of waste generated from the residual bin.  This will include all residual waste from the two and three bin systems throughout the City.  It is anticipated that tenders will be called in September 2010.

 

Since the original tender in 2007, there have been significant changes in the waste industry. David Burns outlined these changes as follows:

 

·    Seven of the fourteen facilities that are operating with municipal waste are said to be struggling to meet technical performance expectations and there are indications of contractual stresses; i.e., half of the municipal waste of alternative waste treatment facilities are under some form of duress and not delivering on expectations.

 

·    in less than ten years from now putrescibles landfill capacity in Sydney will be exhausted.

 

·    Both Eastern Creek and Woodlawn landfill facilities have recently exceeded their annual tonnage caps for waste receival on more than one occasion.

 

·    The sale of WSN presents a major uncertainty in the market with concerns about the timing for completion of the sale, the identity of the buyers and the intention of the buyers in dealing with assets.

 

·    There has been a delay in the full production capacity at the WSN Jacks Gully mixed waste processing facility; i.e., the only provider capable of supplying both the disposal and beneficial processing services has been removed from the market and this situation is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.

 

·    The SITA facility at Kemps Creek has merchant capacity that remains unfilled after the letting of the Liverpool and Penrith contracts, thought to be in the order of 35,000 – 50,000 tonnes per annum.  This merchant capacity is for accommodation of both source separated organics and mixed waste and will be allocated by SITA on a first-come, first-served basis; i.e., it is highly probable that source separated organics feed stocks may be favoured over mixed waste feed stocks. It is expected that SITA will be a prospective tenderer.

 

·    The GRL facility at Eastern Creek is thought to have remaining merchant capacity in the order of 20,000 – 30,000 tonnes per annum, which additional capacity is unlikely to come on-stream without some capital injection;  i.e., GLR is unlikely to be a supplier of mixed waste processing in the short term.

 

·    The approved waste processing facility for Woodlawn is unlikely to commence whilst caps exist on landfill receivals and with the Clyde transfer station for this facility at capacity; i.e., in the short term Veolia is unlikely to fill the gap vacated by WSN as a supplier of both disposal and processing capabilities.

 

These issues present a high probability for Council to secure short-term waste disposal options at landfill of five years or less.  Under the State Government’s Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy and in accordance with the Waste and Sustainability Improvement Payments program, councils must not enter into long-term arrangements (not exceeding five years) for the landfilling of its mixed waste. David Burns noted that depending on where the waste is taken for disposal or treatment may impact on the cartage costs paid to SITA under the current transport tender of the residual waste. David Burns will report back to Council as this issue proceeds.

 

A question was raised concerning the current tonnage of residual waste to landfill. Geoff Brown will report back to the next meeting of the Committee with this figure.

 

RECOMMENDED that the information contained in the report on Waste Management Services be received.

 

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

David Burns commented that Randwick City Council has written to Penrith City Council with correspondence regarding Container Deposit Legislation to combat litter and recycling issues. David Burns noted that this may impact on recycling contracts with VISY due to the financial income VISY receives from plastic bottles.

 

David Burns discussed a presentation from The Smith Family recently in regards to recycling shoes and clothes via charity bins. Ryde Council currently have an arrangement in place with The Smith Family. Their clothing bins currently have 5% of donations ending up in shops and being reused Australia wide.  The bulk is exported to Africa for use for the underprivileged.  At their Villawood facility, clothes are treated and made in to Geotextiles, insulation and washing wipes.

 

Patricia Ryan asked is the Smith Family the only charity that offers this service?  David Burns replied no there are other charities.  Cr Davies said we should promote this charity.

 

John Kliese said that some of these charity bins are an eyesore especially in St Marys.  Cr Davies suggested that sign posting should be placed around these bins to stop the dumping of large items like mattresses and bags of rubbish around the bins and include information that fines could be issued if dumping occurs.  Message needs to be sent to residents about what can be delivered to these bins.

 

David Burns suggested that Smith Family do a presentation at the next committee meeting, and will produce a report to the next meeting.

 

Trevor Robey asked about the cost of rectifying the three bin service including advertising, bags, postage etc.  David Burns said he was unable to come up with the answer at this meeting.

 

Patricia Ryan asked about recycling of Mobile Phones. Amanda Morahan commented that Mobile Muster have sachets available from Council, Post offices and on line through a reply paid system.

 

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 8.30pm.

 

Next Meeting to be advised and emailed to committee members.

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Waste Services Committee meeting held on 15 July, 2010 be adopted.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A City of Opportunities

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
 Access Committee MEETING

HELD ON 4 August, 2010

 

 

 

PRESENT

Councillor Jackie Greenow (Chair), Sherille Stephens, Michael Morris, Ronda Hopkins.

 

IN ATTENDANCE

 

Graham Howe, Acting Building Projects and Maintenance Coordinator; Hans Meijer, City Works Manager; Joe Ibbitson, Community Programs Coordinator; Robyn Brookes, Disability Services Officer; Vanessa Muscat, Environmental Health and Building Surveyor; Erich Weller, Community and Cultural Development Manager; Steve Barratt, Building Compliance Coordinator.

 

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Leave of Absence was previously granted to Councillor Robert Ardill for the period 26 July 2010 to 20 August 2010 inclusive.

APOLOGIES

Apologies were accepted from Councillor Prue Guillaume, John Farragher, Tricia Hitchen and Ben Felten.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Access Committee Meeting - 2 June 2010

The minutes of the Access Committee Meeting of 2 June 2010 were confirmed with the following amendment:

 

“GB2  Memo from Parks Manager regarding Glenmore Park Toilets

 

A memo from the Parks Manager which referred to issues discussed at the April meeting was handed out.  Members of the Access Committee were concerned that the memo did not provide additional information about the accessibility of toilets in Glenmore Park.”

 

Request that the matter be pursued with the Parks Manager.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

Nil

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

A City of Opportunities

 

1        Disability, Arts and Culture                                                                                               

Robyn Brookes spoke to the report and advised that it outlines the primary focus areas and describes the strategies and activities undertaken by Council.  The report also outlines the National Arts and Disability Strategy.

 

Since the Disability Arts and Culture Forum was held at the International Day of People with Disability 2009 celebrations a distribution list for a Penrith Disability Arts and Cultural network has been established.  A capacity building workshop was held on 29 July which was facilitated by Professor Helen Armstrong from the Centre for Cultural Research at UWS.  A survey has also been conducted to identify gaps and ideas for the future.

 

Some matters discussed at the Workshop included:

 

·    a music map for the area;

·    the possibility of space at neighbourhood centres and opportunities for partnerships;

·    quite a lot of organisations take people out of the area to arts and cultural venues;

·    transport is a key issue.

 

A meeting will be held next week to look at the outcomes for further progress and also a possible funding submission.

 

RECOMMENDED that the information contained in the report on Disability, Arts and Culture be received.

 

2        Productivity Commission Inquiry - National Disability Long Term Care and Support Scheme                                                                                                                                             

Robyn Brookes spoke to the report and advised that at the last meeting a summary of the issues paper was circulated.  The report identifies the key issues to form the basis for the development of Council’s submission to the inquiry.

 

Joe Ibbitson advised that the dot points on page 5 of the report are the key areas that have been identified at this stage in terms of Council’s submission.

 

The closing date for final submissions is 16 August 2010.

 

RECOMMENDED that the information contained in the report on Productivity Commission Inquiry - National Disability Long Term Care and Support Scheme be received.

 

3        Access Committee 2008-10 - End of Term Highlights                                                      

Joe Ibbitson presented his report on the Access Committee’s achievements over the past two years.  Page 8 of the business paper lists the key highlights during the period 2008-2010.  The primary achievement of the Committee is the completion of the Penrith Inclusion Plan – People with Disability 2009-2013 which incorporates over 80 actions to make Penrith more accessible and inclusive.  Another highlight was the selection of Councillor Greenow as a finalist in the Local Government category of the National Disability Awards in 2009.  Additional funding was received from the Department of Local Government to establish the new Disability Services Officer position.

 

Committee members advised other achievements included the ramp at the University of the Third Age (U3A) building and the entrance door to the Passadena Room in the Council Civic Centre.

 

RECOMMENDED that the information contained in the report on Access Committee 2008-10 - End of Term Highlights be received.

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

GB 1          Ageing, Disability and Home Care (ADHC) Consultation                                     

Robyn Brookes spoke to a letter received from The Hon Peter Primrose, Minister for Ageing, Disability Services, Volunteering and Youth.  The Minister hosted a series of consultations regarding the next stage of Stronger Together, which is being reviewed to see how it is progressing and suggestions for the future.  The document was circulated at the consultation and is available on the front page of the ADHC website.

 

GB 2          Draft National Disability Strategy                                                                           

Robyn Brookes advised that the draft National Disability Strategy has been released.

Erich Weller advised that the Access Committee made a brief submission about 12 months ago.  Erich Weller advised that the material will be reviewed and reported at the next meeting.  If the closing date is before the next Access Committee meeting members will be emailed.

 

GB 3          Pram Ramp on Marsden Road                                                                                

Ronda Hopkins raised the question of the footpath in Marsden Road and advised that to date nothing has been done.  It has been advised that it is illegal to use a pram ramp for a driveway.

Councillor Greenow asked Ronda Hopkins to email Joe Ibbitson the information regarding this matter so he can forward it on to the relevant department.

 

GB 4          Low Hanging Trees on Derby Street                                                                       

Sherille Stephens advised that on Derby Street between Castlereagh Street and Evan Street the trees hang low over the footpath.  The trees block out the light so that it is dark and difficult to see.

 

Councillor Greenow advised that the last two issues would normally be reported directly to a Council officer and not brought to the Committee.

 

GB 5          Policy Review Committee meeting                                                                                     

Councillor Greenow advised that a report detailing the achievements of the Access Committee is presented to Council’s Policy Review Committee at the end of each term. Council officers write the report but usually one of the Committee members presents it to Council.  The Committee members also have dinner with Councillors.

Erich Weller advised that a report is likely to be presented to either the 30 August or 13 September Policy Review Committee meeting.

Councillor Greenow asked members to think about coming to the dinner and meeting and advise Council officers of their attendance.  It is a way to profile the Access Committee as well as letting people know what is happening.

Joe Ibbitson will send information out to Access Committee members before the Policy Review Committee meeting.  Erich Weller advised that the press would also be present at the meeting.

 

The next meeting of the Access Committee will be on 6 October 2010 which will be the last meeting of this term of the Committee.  Councillor Greenow gave her apologies for the October meeting.

 

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 6.10pm.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee meeting held on 4 August, 2010 be adopted.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Leading City

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
 Policy Review Committee MEETING

HELD ON 30 August, 2010

 

 

 

PRESENT

His Worship the Mayor Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM, Kaylene Allison, Robert Ardill, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Tanya Davies, Ross Fowler OAM, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow, Prue Guillaume, Marko Malkoc and Kath Presdee.

 

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Leave of Absence was previously granted to Councillor Karen McKeown for the period 17 August 2010 to 20 September 2010 inclusive.

APOLOGIES

Apologies were received for Councillor Jim Aitken OAM and Councillor John Thain.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Policy Review Committee Meeting - 9 August 2010

The minutes of the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 9 August 2010 were confirmed.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

There were no declarations of interest.

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

A City of Opportunities

 

1        Paint the Town REaD

Children’s Services Development Officer, Karen Van Woundenberg introduced the report and invited Barbie Bates & Julie Jasprizza-Laus from Mission Australia, who gave a brief presentation on the initiative and sought Council’s support in partnering the program.                                                                         

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Paint the Town REaD be received

2.     Council support the initiative “Paint the Town REaD” within existing resources available including the Annual Reading Day.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2        Youth Action Plan 2010-2013 - Outcome of Further Consultations

Community Programmes Co-ordinator, Tracy Leahy gave a brief introduction to the report and took questions from the Councillors.                                                                                                        

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Youth Action Plan 2010-2013 - Outcome of Further Consultations be received

2.     Council endorse the Youth Action Plan 2010–2013 at Attachment 1 for implementation.

 

A Liveable City

 

3        Draft Public Spaces Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) - Code of Practice                    

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Draft Public Spaces Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) - Code of Practice be received.

2.     Council adopt the Draft Public Spaces Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Program Code of Practice.

 

3.    All CCTV cameras under the ownership and operation of Penrith City Council be operated in accordance with the Public Spaces Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Program Code of Practice.

4.   A further report be prepared detailing the:

·    Current annual cost of the existing Public Space CCTV Program.

·    Cost of the relocation of hard-drives, used to record and store camera footage to a central location within the Civic Centre, including upgrade of system infrastructure.

 

·    Feasibility of, and costs involved, with the retention of all CCTV camera footage from all sites.

 

·    Possibility of further sites in the Penrith LGA, including cameras at the War Memorial sites, determine costs and develop a prioritised implementation program.

 

·    Use of Mobile CCTV Cameras at identified hot spots.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 8:27pm.

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 30 August, 2010 be adopted.

 

 

  


DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

Item                                                                                                                                       Page

 

 

A Leading City

 

1        Draft 2009-10 Financial Statements

 

2        2010 Local Government Association of NSW Annual Conference

 

A City of Opportunities

 

3        Community Assistance Program 2010 - Rolling Component Projects Approved Under Delegated Authority  January - June 2010

 

4        Development Application No. 10/0178 - Proposed detached dual occupancy at Lot 736 DP 717440 (No.1) Mount Close, Cranebrook . Applicant: Mr R & Mrs H Davies;  Owner: Mr R & Mrs H Davies DA10/0178

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

5        Development Application DA09/1122 - Proposed (6) x Attic Style Villas at Lot 101 DP 243599 (No. 27) Hobart Street, Oxley Park. Applicant: Ultra Design and Engineering;  Owner: Sam Hassan DA09/1122

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

A Green City

 

6        Western Sydney Regional Illegal Dumping (RID) Squad

 

A Liveable City

 

7        NSW Bike Plan 2010 - Funding Offer from Roads and Traffic Authority

 

8        Local Government Road Safety Program - Roads and Traffic Authority Grant Funding 2010-2011

 

9        Tender Reference 05-10/11 for the provision of Graffiti Removal Services

 

10      The Driftway, Londonderry - Memorandum of Understanding with Hawkesbury City Council

  

 


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


A Leading City

 

Item                                                                                                                                       Page

 

1        Draft 2009-10 Financial Statements

 

2        2010 Local Government Association of NSW Annual Conference

 

 



Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Leading City

 

 

 

1

Draft 2009-10 Financial Statements   

 

Compiled by:                Brett Richardson, Acting Financial Accountant

Authorised by:             Andrew Moore, Financial Services Manager

Vicki O’Kelly, Group Manager - Finance   

 

Objective

We demonstrate accountability, transparency and ethical conduct

Community Outcome

A Council that manages its finances, services and assets effectively (4)

Strategic Response

Deliver services for the City and its communities, and maintain our long term financial sustainability (4.1)

        

 

Executive Summary

The draft 2009-10 Financial Statements have been completed and will be presented at this meeting. The Financial Statements are prepared by Council’s staff, using the accrual method of accounting, and comply with Australian Accounting Standards and the New South Wales Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting. Mr Dennis Banicevic, a Director of PricewaterhouseCoopers, will be addressing the meeting as Council’s Auditor.

Introduction

This report covers:

·    Addressing of the meeting by Council’s auditor

·    Legislative requirements

·    Background to the Financial Policies

·    Budget Amounts

·    Summary of Financial Results.

Addressing of the Meeting by Council’s Auditor

Mr Dennis Banicevic, a Director of PricewaterhouseCoopers will be addressing the meeting. Dennis has over twenty years audit experience in Local Government, has a large number of New South Wales councils as audit clients, and has been responsible for Council’s audit for over ten years.

Legislative Requirements

The Local Government Act requires the following steps:

 

1.   Council staff prepare the statements

2.   Council issues a statement that the accounts are in order

3.   Council refers the statements to its auditors for checking

4.   The auditor returns the statements with an audit opinion attached

5.   The statements are placed on public display and the community may make submissions

6.   The statements are formally presented during a council meeting.

 

Council officers have completed step 1 and prepared the statements and this report recommends completion of steps 2, 3 and 4 at tonight’s meeting. The auditors have received an advance copy of the statements and have now completed several weeks of their audit program. It is considered appropriate that Council issue the required statement for the 2009-10 accounts.

 

This report also deals with formal requirements to complete the 2009-10 Financial Statements.

 

The financial statements are prepared by Council staff, using the accrual method of accounting, and comply with Australian Accounting Standards and the New South Wales Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting. The statements are required to be audited by an independent auditor, and lodged with the Division of Local Government (DLG) before 6 November 2010.

 

An unaudited copy of the statements were presented to Council’s Audit Committee meeting held 25 August 2010. At that meeting the Audit Committee resolved that:

1.   the information contained in the report on the Draft 2009-10 Financial Statements be received.

2.   the Audit Committee is satisfied with the answers it has received and is unaware of any reason why the Statements should not be adopted

3.   the Audit Committee refers the Statements (after any adjustments discussed in the meeting are affected) to Council for signing

4.   the Audit Committee requests management to include statements on liquidity, available cash and contingencies associated with Developer Contributions in the commentary to the Financial Statements

Key factors in the production of this year’s financial statements are discussed below.

Fair Value

The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for application to reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. The AASB has issued Australian equivalents to IFRS (AIFRS). The adoption of AIFRS has been reflected in the preparation of Council’s financial statements since the year ending 30 June 2006.

 

As part of the transition to Fair Value, Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE), Operational Land and Buildings were all brought to fair value for 30 June 2008. This revaluation resulted in a $180.5m increase to Council’s Balance Sheet. Council’s buildings were revalued and componentised at 30 June 2009 by Scott Fullarton Valuations Pty Ltd. These revaluations and componentisation have seen a significant increase in the depreciation expense for Council’s building assets in 2009-10.

The transition to Fair Value of Roads, Bridges, Footpaths, and Drainage was deferred by the DLG from 30 June 2009 to 30 June 2010 (circular 09-09). Revaluation of Council’s Road, Drainage, and Footpath assets have been completed as part of the 2009-10 Financial Statements. This revaluation has seen Council staff conduct a comprehensive assessment of Council’s Infrastructure assets for not only their condition but also an assessment of the remaining useful life of these assets. This assessment has seen $279m added to Council’s Balance Sheet through Infrastructure, Property, Plant, and Equipment.

Land Under Roads

AASB 1051 was issued in December 2007 and deals with Land Under Roads (LUR). LUR is land under roadways and road reserves including land under footpaths, nature strips and median strips. The Standard is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2008.

 

In Circular 09-25 issued by the DLG, it was determined that in accordance with AASB 1051 Land Under Roads, Council may elect to recognise or not to recognise as an asset LUR acquired before 1 July 2008. It also determined that LUR acquired after that date is to be recognised and accounted for under AASB 116. The circular also acknowledged that a method of reliable measurement for fair value of LUR was yet to be determined on a sector-wide basis. For this reason, the DLG allowed councils to elect to recognise LUR acquired before 1 July 2008 but defer that recognition until the valuation methodology is available. Council has continued to elect to take up the option of deferring the recognition of LUR acquired before 1 July 2008 until a valuation methodology is determined by the DLG. It is therefore intended that LUR acquired during the 2009-10 financial year be recorded in Council’s Financial Statements using the same valuation methodology as LUR recorded for 2008-09, that is, a “municipal rate” determined per hectare and applied to the area of LUR recognised for the year. Accordingly, $808,000 of land under roads has been recognised in the 2009-10 Financial Statements as acquired during the 2009-10 financial year.

Condition of Public Works

Special Schedule 7 of the attached Financial Statements details the cost of bringing Council’s Buildings, Roads, and Drainage up to satisfactory standard. The figures used in this Schedule are based on best estimate for buildings, and actual condition-based calculations for roads.

 

For Council’s road network, data received from SMEC for 2009-10 indicates that the pavement condition index (PCI) has declined over the previous year. This data, along with a review of what is needed to bring roads to an appropriate satisfactory standard based on each road, has resulted in a slight increase in the cost to bring roads to a satisfactory standard from $44.4m in 2008-09 to $44.9m in 2009-10.

 

Reviewing the works required to bring Buildings up to a satisfactory standard for 2009-10 has seen the cost to bring buildings to a satisfactory rating drop from $8.4m in 2008-09 to $4.5m in 2009-10. With the introduction of the Works and Assets system throughout Council, more accurate information will be available from this system to allow better measurement of these ratings and standards.

Developer Contributions

On 4 June 2010, the Premier of NSW announced changes to the Developer Contributions planning process with a key element being the capping of development contributions to $20,000 per new lot/dwelling.  Penrith City Council has a number of current and future release areas that would be affected by this change and the indicative impact of this announcement has been estimated at a shortfall of $268m for the provision of essential infrastructure.  Following intense lobbying by Growth Councils, including Penrith, the Premier of NSW announced further changes to these reforms on 31 August 2010.  These changes, which include increasing the cap for Greenfield sites to $30,000 and grandfathering existing plans where 25% of DAs have been lodged, have resulted in the WELL Release Area being the only current release area impacted by the reforms.  The indicative shortfall for the WELL Release Area, under the most recent changes, is estimated to be $32m.  The shortfall for future release areas including North Penrith, Penrith Lakes and the St Marys Release Area is estimated to be $104.5m, bringing the total potential shortfall to $136.5m across the four release areas.  These changes have been reflected in Notes 17 and 18 of the Financial Statements being presented tonight. Further details of the recent announcement have been provided to Councillors by memo prior to tonight’s meeting.

 

At the time of these announcements Council had completed a review of its section 94 plans, as directed by the Minister for Planning, and these revised plans had been adopted by Council and submitted to the Minister for Planning for determination and remaking. As part of the  review Council’s plans will have a clause inserted that allows for the works completed in advance of receipt of the funds  to be offset against the balances of the total s94 plans rather than against Council’s internal reserves as is the current situation.  Unfortunately the announced changes and the introduction of the cap, has delayed the remaking of these plans.  The inability of Council’s s94 plans to borrow against each other for works funded ahead of contributions continues to constrain Council’s Unrestricted Current Ratio.

Summary of Financial Results

The following figures are draft and may be subject to audit adjustment. A final copy of the 2009-10 Financial Statements will be provided once they have been adopted by Council. An in-depth commentary and analysis of the year’s results is again included in the Financial Statements. The following table contains some of the key results:

 

 

Council’s financial position as at 30 June 2010 reflects current challenges in the economic environment. After allowing for $4.5m of capital grants and contributions, Council finished the year with a deficit from ordinary activities of $5.9m (surplus of $10.9m 2008-09). This change in operating result from 2008-09 of $16.7m is primarily attributable to a significant increase in depreciation and a reduction in capital grants and contributions.  Council’s depreciation expense for 2009-10 rose $11.1m as a result of the revaluation and componentisation of its building assets as at 30 June 2009 combined with increased depreciation of the road network.  Council’s continued transition of its assets to Fair Value in line with the DLG timeframe will see the annual depreciation expense continue to rise in future years. Capital Grants and Contribution fell $7.6m compared to 2008-09 following reduced developer contributions and dedications of $5.3m in 2009-10.  In addition, specific purpose capital grants reduced $2.3m compared to 2008-09 which included $833,000 for RFS projects and $955,000 for roads and bridges, including the 2008-09 Blackspot program.

 

Unrestricted current assets exceed current liabilities by a ratio of 1.03:1. This is below Council’s targeted minimum of 1.25:1 and below the revised Division of Local Government’s benchmark of 1.5:1. The unrestricted current ratio declined 11.9% compared to the previous year (1.17:1). This ratio is constrained each year by Council’s practice of forward funding s94 works in advance of contributions by borrowing against internal reserves. For 30 June 2010 these borrowings amounted to $6.2m. Excluding these borrowings from the calculation would give an Unrestricted Current Ratio of 1.30:1.  Unfortunately the State Government’s changes to the Development Contribution Plans making process and the introduction of the $20,000 cap, has delayed changes to Council’s s94 plans and these works in advance continue to impact this indicator.

 

Working Capital - an internal liquidity measure - has remained stable at $3.6 million (2009-10 - $3.6m), and remains well above Council’s adopted target of $2 million.

 

The outstanding loan liability increased, in line with expectations, to $69.7 million. The amount of operating revenue committed to servicing this debt has increased as a result of the increases in Council’s loan liability to 7.82% however remains well within the DLG target of 10%.

Budget Deficit

Council received a report on the 2009-10 year-end budget position as part of the Operational Plan review at the Ordinary meeting of 16 August 2010. At that meeting a deficit of $1.1m was proposed, which was increased to $1.4m by Council’s decision to increase the transfer to the Employee Leave Entitlements (ELE) Reserve by an additional $350,000 to bring forward the achievement of the targeted provision amount as per Council policy.

 

Further alterations to final budgets, but not the adopted budget result of $1.4m, have occurred since this report was presented as a result of the finalisation of the annual statements and the accompanying audit process. These changes include:

 

·    Controlled entity reserve movements adjusted to reflect final results provided by entities

·    Children Services income and reserve balances adjusted to reflect final results

·    Lenore Drive, Erskine Park project allocated further expenditure of $771,000 in 2009-10 resulting in the removal of this project from the Revote List, a change to funding from s94 Reserve, and a change to this project on the Capital Projects List.

 

The June Review of the 2009-10 Operational Plan available on Council’s website, and hardcopy version available to the public, have been updated to reflect the abovementioned changes.

Legislative Requirements

The Local Government Act classifies various transactions as being write-offs of rates and charges. The reasons for write-offs include properties becoming exempt from rates, pensioner rebates, changes in rating category, rounding down of payments by 4 cents, postponed rates, domestic waste charges reversed because they were levied in error and, rates and charges reversed due to amended valuations.

 

The following tables summarise the rates and sundry debtor’s amounts written off under delegated authority, or pursuant to Council resolutions, and are provided for information:

 

Rates And Charges Written Off

$

General Rates

198,145.75

 

Extra Charges

7,774.80

 

Domestic Waste

$4,836.41

 

TOTAL

210,756.96

 

Pensioner Rebate Abandonments

$

General Rates     - Statutory

1,716,284.34

 

Domestic Waste - Statutory

511,968.64

 

TOTAL

2,228,252.98 

 

Sundry Debtor Abandonments

 $

Sundry Debtor

49,908.71

TOTAL

49,908.71

 

Extra charges include interest and legal costs, and are written off due to financial hardship, and where the original rate or domestic waste charge is required to be written off.

 

Sundry Debtors abandonments include a number of larger debts that were reported to the Ordinary Meeting of Council held 22 February 2010 totalling $26,851.75 and the aggregate of a number of other small debts that are either unable to be pursued due to their small size or deemed to be uncollectible.

 

During 2009-10, stores and tools to the value of $6,548.43 were written off as summarised below.

 

Stores & Materials Written Off

$

Stores and Tools

6,548.43

..43

TOTAL

6,548.43

Summary

The draft statements are presented for Council to form its opinion. The required opinion is set out in the following recommendation. If resolved, the Statement of Council's Opinion can be signed and handed to the auditors at tonight’s meeting.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Draft 2009-10 Financial Statements be received.

2.     Pursuant to s413(2)(c) it is the Council's opinion that:

a.   The financial statements and schedules have been drawn up in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and Regulations, the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting, the Local Government Australian Infrastructure Management Guidelines, and Australian Accounting Standards. The Code requires a phasing in of the new accounting requirements

b.   Apart from the non-recognition of land under roads as required by the phasing process, the statements comply with Australian Statements of Accounting Concepts

c.   The financial statements present fairly the Council's financial position as at 30 June 2010 and the operating result for the year then ended

d.   The statements are in accord with Council's accounting and other records.

3.     Pursuant to clause 215 of the Local Government Financial Management Regulation it is the Council's opinion that:

a.   The accompanying Special Purpose Financial report has been drawn up in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and Regulations, the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting, and the requirements of National Competition Policy. The Code requires the inclusion of various charges and subsidies which are not actually paid or payable.

b.   The report is a special purpose report and is not required to comply with Australian Accounting Standards. The above legislative requirements differ from Australian Accounting Standards and hence the report does not comply with Australian Accounting Standards.

c.   The financial statements present a modelled scenario for comparative purposes. They do not report an actual result.

4.     Council confirms its endorsement of the budget in the knowledge that some of its business activities are not making commercial returns. The existence of notional subsidies represents Council’s commitment to its community service obligations.

5.     The Statements be forwarded to Council's Auditors.

6.     Abandonments for 2010 as detailed be written off.

 

 

 

 

7.     The balance of stores and materials be adjusted in the stores and materials registers in accordance with the various write-offs.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Leading City

 

 

 

2

2010 Local Government Association of NSW Annual Conference   

 

Compiled by:                Stephen Pearson, Executive Services Officer

Authorised by:             Glenn Schuil, Acting Executive Officer  

 

Objective

We demonstrate accountability, transparency and ethical conduct

Community Outcome

A Council that behaves responsibly and ethically (5)

Strategic Response

Champion accountability and transparency, and responsible and ethical behaviour (5.1)

       

 

Executive Summary

There are two additional matters to be resolved in relation to the forthcoming Local Government Association Annual Conference to be held in Albury from 24 – 27 October 2010, namely:

1.   two additional motions:

·      Privatisation of electricity providers

·      Tendering with respect to elected local government organisations

2.   change to Council delegate to the Conference

 

The report also provides information on the outcome of the One Association Convention held on 16 August 2010.

Background

The Local Government Association of NSW (LGA) will hold its annual policy-making Conference in Albury from 24 – 27 October 2010.

 

The theme of the Conference is “Modernising Local Government”.

 

Motions

 

Council resolved on 16 August 2010 to submit eleven (11) motions to the 2010 LGA Conference (following a report to the Policy Review Committee 9 August 2010 – item 3) in respect of the following matters:

 

1.    Funding to Local Government through the Regional and Local Community Infrastructure Program

2.    Illegally advertised signs/bill posters

3.    Illegal advertising on trailers or similar structures

4.    Expanded Polystyrene packaging

5.    Development Contributions – Planning changes announced by the NSW Government

6.    Planning Reforms

7.    Timeframe for publishing of Local Environmental Plans

8.    Councillor exemptions for the preparation of Citywide Local Environmental Plans

9.    Regulation of the Waste Disposal Industry

10.  Efficient and timely determination of Development Applications

11.  Swimming Pool Safety

 

Council also resolved as follows:

·    A further report be brought to Council regarding the possible lodgement of a late motion dealing with the privatisation of electricity providers

·    A memo be provided to all Councillors on tendering with respect to elected local government organisations.

 

Delegates and Observers

 

Council resolved on 24 May 2010 to nominate Councillors Ross Fowler OAM, Marko Malkoc, Ben Goldfinch, Greg Davies, Kaylene Allison, Karen McKeown and Robert Ardill as its voting delegates to attend the 2010 LGA Conference.

 

Council also nominated Councillors Kath Presdee and John Thain as its observers, and it is sponsoring up to three (3) Aboriginal observers, nominated by the Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council, to attend the Conference.

 

One Association Convention

 

As Council is aware, the Local Government and Shires Associations of NSW have resolved to progress the formation of One Association for Local Government with a view to forming a strong and unified voice to represent Local Government in NSW.

 

A report was submitted to the Policy Review Committee meeting on 28 June 2010 (item 2) informing Council of:

1.    the formation and actions of the One Association Taskforce

2.    a proposed One Association Convention (to be held on 16 & 17 August 2010)

3.    a proposed Discussion Paper (to incorporate base principles to be discussed at the Convention).

 

As a result, Council resolved on 19 July 2010 to:

1.    nominate His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM and Deputy Mayor, Ross Fowler OAM or their representatives to attend the One Association Convention to be held in Sydney on 16 & 17 August 2010.

2.    prepare a Position Paper for Council’s consideration and endorsement once the Discussion Paper is received.

 

A Position Paper was prepared and submitted to the Policy Review Committee on 9 August 2010 proposing a Council response for each of the following eight issues:

1.   Association Membership

2.   Representational Structure

3.   Size of the Board of Directors

4.   Voting for the Board Members & Office Holders

5.   Term Lengths

6.   Term Limits

7.   Alternating the Positions of President & Treasurer

8.   Voting Rights.

 

Council subsequently endorsed the Position Paper at its meeting held on 16 August 2010 to enable Council’s delegates to represent and vote for Council’s preferred position in respect of each of the 40 One Association Taskforce recommendations.

Current Position

 

Motions

 

1.   Categorisation of Motions

 

The Draft Conference Business Paper has been released and Council’s eleven (11) motions have been categorised as follows:

 

Category 1

 

The following motions have been classified as Category 1 motions and will therefore be placed before the Conference for consideration:

 

Motion 29

Swimming Pool Safety

 

Motion 46

Development Contributions – Planning changes announced by the NSW Government

 

Motion 56

Funding to Local Government through the Regional and Local Community Infrastructure Program

 

Motion 85

Councillor exemptions for the preparation of Citywide Local Environmental Plans

 

Motion 105

Regulation of the Waste Disposal Industry

 

Motion 107

Expanded Polystyrene packaging

 

 

Category 2

 

The following motions have been classified as Category 2 motions and will therefore be referred to the Executive for action prior to the Conference at its meeting to be held on 15 October 2010:

 

Motion 18

Illegally advertised signs/bill posters

 

Motion 19

Illegal advertising on trailers or similar structures

 

Motion 20

Efficient and timely determination of Development Applications

 

Motion 63

Planning Reforms

 

Motion 64

Timeframe for publishing of Local Environmental Plans

 

2.   Two Additional Motions

 

As indicated, eleven (11) motions have already been submitted for consideration at the Conference.

 

There is provision for late motions to be submitted on the two additional matters recently identified by Council, namely:

·   Privatisation of electricity providers

·   Tendering with respect to elected local government organisations

 

Late motions can be submitted up to the close of business on Friday 8 October 2010 and they will be categorised using the same methodology as applied for motions received prior to the original cut off date.

 

Only Late Motions which are determined to be Category 1 motions will be dealt with by the Conference, and they will only be dealt with at the final session on the final morning of Conference and only by approval of Conference delegates.

 

MOTION 12 – Privatisation of electricity providers

Background

At the Policy Review Committee meeting of 9 August 2010, the possibility of an additional motion to the Conference on the theme of opposing the privatisation of the New South Wales electricity industry was flagged. It was noted that such a motion does not fit within any of the themes of the 2010 Conference and would therefore be considered a Category 2 motion to be considered by the Executive prior to the Conference as discussed earlier in the report.

 

Council considered a report on electricity at the Ordinary Meeting on 1 February 2010, which provided some background to the current electricity market in New South Wales.  At that meeting it was resolved that the information be received. A copy of that report is provided as an attachment.

 

It has become apparent that there needs to be additional investment in electricity infrastructure to ensure the long term ongoing supply to households and businesses in NSW. The NSW State Government is proposing that the additional investment comes by way of privatisation of the State owned electricity providers.

 

A number of motions were tabled at the LGA Conference in 2008 and 2007 opposing the privatisation of the electricity industry in NSW.  Penrith City Council has previously indicated support for those motions.

 

The proposed motion highlights the previous adopted policy position of the LGA and seeks confirmation of this position.

 

From:

Penrith City Council

 

Issue:

Opposition to the privatisation of electricity providers in New South Wales

 

Theme:

 

Not Applicable, this motion is likely to be considered to be a Category 2 Motion.

 

Motion text:

That the Local Government Association re- affirms its policy position opposing the privatisation of electricity providers in New South Wales and that this be endorsed as the LGA policy statement.

 

Note from Council:

 

A number of motions were tabled at the LGA Conference in 2008 and 2007 opposing the privatisation of the electricity industry in NSW and subsequently LGA opposition to the privatisation of NSW Electricity, water and sewerage assets became policy.  It is timely that the Association re-affirms its commitment to this position.

  

LGA Policy Statement

Local Government opposes the privatisation of NSW electricity water and sewerage assets.

 

Electricity generation and distribution assets and water and sewerage assets are essential public infrastructure which must be maintained in public ownership to ensure that the public interest is served.

 

Local government does not accept that the State Government is the legitimate owner of electricity distribution assets which were appropriated from Local Government and therefore does not acknowledge its right to sell them.

 

 

MOTION 13 - Tendering with respect to elected local government organisations

 

Background

This matter was originally raised by Hunters Hill Council as a motion to the 2004 LGA Conference (Motion No169).

 

Whilst the motion was carried and the resolution sent by the LGA to Mr Garry Payne, former Director General of the Department of Local Government, and a reminder letter sent to the Director General, the LGA never received a response and the legislation remains to this day, unchanged.

 

In view of the recent time delays encountered associated with the re-tendering of a number of Westpool services (such as the actuary, auditor, fund manager and claims manager), it would be worthwhile to again bring this matter forward as a motion to the 2010 LGA Conference.

 

The present process for reaching a decision on these tenders is considered to be inconvenient, archaic and cumbersome and it could easily be addressed by a simple amendment to the Local Government Act 1993 as was previously proposed by Hunters Hill Council.

 

The ‘Motion text’ and ‘Note from Council’ as previously prepared by Hunters Hill Council for the 2004 LGA Conference are still relevant and it is proposed that this will be submitted by Penrith City Council to the 2010 LGA Conference, as outlined below  

 

From:

Penrith City Council

 

Issue:

Tendering with respect to elected local government organisations

 

Theme:

Modernising the Financing of Local Government

 

Motion text:

That section 377 (1) of the Local Government Act 1993 – General power of the council to delegate – be amended to allow councils to delegate to Regional Organisation of Councils (ROC’s), strategic alliances or groupings of councils, the power and authority to allow them to accept tenders on behalf of member councils.

 

This can be simply achieved by the following amendment to the clause:

 

377 (1)       A council may, by resolution, delegate to the general manager or any other person or body (not including another employee of the council) any of the functions of the council, other than the following:

 

The acceptance of tenders which are required under this Act to be invited by the council, INSERT THE WORDS

 

….. except where by individual resolution, a Council may delegate to a Regional Organisation of Councils (ROC’s), strategic alliances or grouping of Councils, the authority to undertake and accept or reject tenders on behalf of member councils.

 

Such an action may not take place unless the majority of members have passed such a motion and is binding only to those councils which elect to be part of the tender process.

 

Note from Council:

There will be a significant cost saving in staff and resource time if individual council resolutions are not required for tenders that involve ROCS, strategic alliances or grouping of councils. It will also result in an improved and streamlined process and outcome.

 

It has been identified on a number of occasions that while the tendering sections of the Local Government Act (1993) (section 55) and the Tendering Regulations allow Regional Organisations of Councils (ROC’s), strategic alliances or groupings of councils to conduct a tender process, the requirements of the legislation are overly restrictive in that each participating council must adopt an individual resolution to accept, or reject, a tender at the conclusion of the process.

 

Given the number of councils that may be involved in a regional tender and the fact that they invariably have different meeting dates and cycles, the administrative and bureaucratic processes involved in requiring individual council resolutions is inefficient to the best outcome that may be achieved.

 

The efficiency of the process can be significantly improved with a simple amendment

to section 377 (1) of the Local Government Act 1993, to allow councils to delegate the tender function to Regional Organisations of Councils (ROC’s), strategic alliances or groupings of councils.

 

There are already sufficient measures within section 55 of the Act and the Tendering Regulations to ensure that appropriate governance and accountability standards are maintained during the tender process.

 

This additional power of delegation would allow the Regional Organisations of Councils (ROC’s), strategic alliances or groupings of councils to accept and negotiate a tender without the need for individual council resolutions. It is envisaged that any subsequent contractual or related documentation required by the tender would still need to be executed by all parties to the agreement.

 

Delegates and Observers

 

Councillors Robert Ardill and John Thain have both advised that they are no longer able to attend the 2010 LGA Conference.

 

Councillor Robert Ardill was nominated by Council to attend the Conference as a delegate and Councillor John Thain was nominated by Council to attend the Conference as an observer. Councillor Kath Presdee was also nominated to attend the Conference as an observer.

 

It would be appropriate for Council to formally determine its voting delegate to replace Councillor Robert Ardill.

 

One Association Convention

 

The One Association Convention was held in Sydney on Monday 16 August 2010 – the business was dealt with on one day instead of the scheduled two days – and it was attended by the Mayor, Cr Kevin Crameri OAM, Cr Marko Malkoc and Council’s Executive Officer, Glenn McCarthy.

 

The Convention was facilitated and chaired by the Hon. Richard Torbay MP.

 

Convention delegates voted overwhelmingly in support of the formation of One Association to represent the best interests of Local Government in NSW. The Convention resolved as follows:

 

“That the Local Government Association of NSW and the Shires Association of NSW agree to a single uniform voice to represent Local Government in NSW and agree in principle that the following foundations will form the basis of One Association”

 

The foundations (recommendations) of the Convention referred to are outlined in the attached Appendix 2 and are presented with the original Taskforce Recommendations and Council’s position on each of the Recommendations as adopted by Council on 16 August 2010 in its Position Paper.  One of the issues that were identified at the Policy Review Meeting on 9 August 2010 related to the voting rights of ordinary member councils. The Convention Foundation in respect of this matter was:

 

“For the purpose of voting on motions at Conference, each region will have an equal number of votes, which will be distributed proportionally among those ordinary member councils who fall within that region, with all ordinary member councils receiving a minimum of at least one vote.”

 

Specific details on the equal number of votes for each region and how these votes are allocated among ordinary member councils who fall within that region are yet to be determined.

 

The Convention’s foundations will now be presented to the Local Government Association Conference on 24- 27 October 2010 for ratification.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on 2010 Local Government Association of NSW Annual Conference be received.

2.     Council nominate its voting delegate to replace Councillor Robert Ardill.

3.     The two late motions on

·      ‘Privatisation of electricity providers’; and

·      ‘Tendering with respect to elected local government organisations’

be submitted for inclusion in the 2010 Local Government Association NSW Conference Business Paper.

4.     Council seek the support of Hunters Hill Council in respect to the proposed late motion on ‘Tendering with respect to elected local government organisations’ if this motion is included on the 2010 Local Government Association Conference agenda.

5.     Council note the foundations established for the formation of the One Association for local government arising from the One Association Convention held on 16 August 2010. 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

Report to Ordinary Meeting of 1 February 2010

7 Pages

Appendix

2. View

Foundations of One Association Convention - 16 August 2010

8 Pages

Appendix

  


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 1 - Report to Ordinary Meeting of 1 February 2010

 

 

 








Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 2 - Foundations of One Association Convention - 16 August 2010

 

 

 








 


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


A City of Opportunities

 

Item                                                                                                                                       Page

 

3        Community Assistance Program 2010 - Rolling Component Projects Approved Under Delegated Authority  January - June 2010

 

4        Development Application No. 10/0178 - Proposed detached dual occupancy at Lot 736 DP 717440 (No.1) Mount Close, Cranebrook . Applicant: Mr R & Mrs H Davies;  Owner: Mr R & Mrs H Davies DA10/0178

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

5        Development Application DA09/1122 - Proposed (6) x Attic Style Villas at Lot 101 DP 243599 (No. 27) Hobart Street, Oxley Park. Applicant: Ultra Design and Engineering;  Owner: Sam Hassan DA09/1122

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

 



Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A City of Opportunities

 

 

 

3

Community Assistance Program 2010 - Rolling Component Projects Approved Under Delegated Authority  January - June 2010   

 

Compiled by:                Joe Ibbitson, Community Programs Co-ordinator

Authorised by:             Erich Weller, Community and Cultural Development Manager   

 

Objective

We have access to what we need

Community Outcome

A City with equitable access to services and facilities (7)

Strategic Response

Base the provision of services and facilities on principles of social justice and equity (7.1)

        

 

Executive Summary

This report provides information on the allocation of the 2009-10 Rolling Component Community Assistance Program funds under delegated authority during the period January – June 2010.  The report recommends that the information be received.

 

Background

Through the Community Assistance Program, Council makes small grants to non-profit organisations and community-based groups to help meet local community needs.  The maximum grant is $1,200.

 

There are two components of the Community Assistance Program - the Planned Component and the Rolling Component. The Rolling Component allows for one-off requests to be approved by Council at any time during the year.  This provides a flexible supplement to the Planned Component of the program, which is undertaken each year around October.

 

At the Policy Review Committee meeting on 10 September 2007, Council adopted the 2007 Community Assistance Program (CAP) policy and included it in Council’s Policy Register. The policy identifies that ‘a report will be provided every six months informing Council of successful Rolling Component applications for the relevant period.

 

This report provides information on the 2009-10 CAP Rolling Component projects that have been approved under delegated authority by the General Manager during the six month period January to June 2010.

 

Projects Approved Under Delegation

The following table summarises details of the projects approved during the January to June 2010 period:

 

Project

Organisation

Amount

Make Time Women’s Group - social/support group predominantly for isolated women living in the Cranebrook area.

 

Cranebrook Neighbourhood Centre

$740

Breastfeeding Education Classes – To provide information to breastfeeding, caring for a new baby, adjusting to parenthood and knowing where to find help and support.

 

Australian Breastfeeding Association – Hawkesbury/Nepean Group

$650

Caring Hearts Community Quilters - group is made-up of retirees who make quilts and distribute them in the local area.

 

Caring Hearts Quilting Group

$500

Paint Cranebrook REaD Early Literacy Outreach - will provide an Outreach Early Literacy service to disadvantaged families living in Cranebrook. 

 

Spyns Inc

$938

Open Day - to hold an Open Day to strengthen links between the Coptic Orthodox Church members and the broader community.

 

St Mary & St Marina Coptic Orthodox Church

$1,200

Neighbourhood Advisory Board (NAB) RBA (results based accountability) foundation work

- the NAB functions as a network of services who have involvement in the Cranebrook community consisting of collaborative actions to enhance quality of life and well being for community members.

 

Spyns Inc

$1,200

TOTAL

$5,228

 

A total of $ 5,228.00 has been approved under delegated authority in the period from January to June 2010.

 

In the first half of the funding round July-December 2009, an amount of $500.00 was allocated from the CAP Rolling Component. This allocation was reported to Council in March 2010 as per the Community Assistance Program policy.

 

The total amount approved for CAP Rolling Component projects during the 2009-2010 financial year is $ 5,728.00.

 

All funds available for the CAP Rolling Component 2008-2009 have been expended. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the information contained in the report on Community Assistance Program 2010 - Rolling Component Projects Approved Under Delegated Authority  January - June 2010 be received.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Development Applications

 

 

 

4

Development Application No. 10/0178 - Proposed detached dual occupancy at Lot 736 DP 717440 (No.1) Mount Close, Cranebrook   Applicant:  Mr R & Mrs H Davies;  Owner:  Mr R & Mrs H Davies    

DA10/0178

Compiled by:                Aimee Lee, Environmental Planner

Authorised by:             Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager   

 

Objective

We have access to what we need

Community Outcome

A City with lifestyle and housing choice in our neighbourhoods (8)

Strategic Response

Encourage housing that provides choice, achieves design excellence, and meets community needs (8.1)

      

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

Executive Summary

Council is in receipt of a development application for the construction of a detached dual occupancy comprising demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of two new dwellings along with associated landscaping.

 

The application seeks to vary the development standard for a minimum rear setback requirement as required by Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Land) (LEP 1998).  The application is supported by an objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 (SEPP 1) to the development standard. 

 

The SEPP 1 objection has demonstrated that full compliance with the minimum rear setback requirement is unreasonable and unnecessary due to the ability of the development to meet the objectives of the planning instrument and its consistency with other buildings in the immediate locality.  Furthermore, the development is unlikely to have any significant impacts on the amenity of the locality. 

 

In accordance with the reporting procedures required by the Department of Planning, the matter is forwarded to Council for determination.  The report recommends that the SEPP 1 objection be supported and the development application be approved.

 

Background

A pre-lodgement meeting was held on 17 December 2009 to discuss the proposed detached dual occupancy.  Key issues discussed include:

 

·       The need for an objection pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standard would be required for any proposed variation to the rear setback; 

·       Council’s building envelope control under LEP 1998

·       Setback provisions for corner lots under the provisions of DCP 2006

·       The need for an arborist report is required to assess the removal of any existing trees on the site

·       a proposed concept stormwater plan is required

·       Section 94 Contributions which are applicable. 

 

Site and Surrounds

The site is situated at the northeast corner of Mount Close and Waterfall Crescent, Cranebrook with Laycock Street located to the south and Camelot Drive to the west.  Development in the area is predominantly residential consisting of a combination of single and two-storey dwellings of different architectural styles and construction.

 

The site has a total area of 808m² and has a significant slope from the northeast corner of the site to the southwest.  There is an existing two-storey dwelling house erected on the site.  There are existing trees on the site and on the nature strip (see Locality Map - Appendix No. 1 A3 copies to be provided to Councillors under separate cover).

 

The Proposed Development

The proposed development includes:

 

·          Demolition of the existing dwelling

·          Construction of two dwellings (1 x two storey four bedroom dwelling and 1 x single storey three bedroom dwelling) for the purposes of a detached dual occupancy

·          Removal of three trees

·          Landscaping (see Site Plan Appendix No.3 - A3 copies to be provided to Councillors under separate cover). 

 

The development application was accompanied by:

 

·          An objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 to clause 12 of LEP 1998

·          Statement of Environmental Effects

·          Site and Building Plans

·          Landscape Plan

·          Stormwater Concept Plan

·          BASIX Certificate

 

Planning Assessment

The development has been assessed in accordance with the matters for consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended) (EP&A Act), and having regard to those matters; the following issues have been identified for further consideration.

 

1.   Section 79C(1)(a)(i) – Any Environmental Planning Instrument

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards (SEPP 1)

A variation to the minimum rear setback of 4.0 meters under Clause 12 is proposed with a rear setback of 0.93m.  An objection to development standards within Local Environmental Plan 1998 – Urban Land has been lodged.

 

SEPP 1 seeks to provide flexibility in the application of planning controls where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects stated in Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the EP&A Act.  These objects relate to the proper management of resources to promote the welfare of the community and environment, and, to promote the orderly and economic use of development of land. 

 

The SEPP 1 objection has been lodged in relation to the provisions of Clause 12 of LEP 1998, and in particular the provisions of Clause 12(4)(a).  The relevant clause states:

 

“The council must not grant consent to development that involves the erection of a building unless: that building is set back at least 6 metres from the rear boundary of the site or, in the case of a single storey building in Zone No. 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 2(d) or 2(e), at least 4 metres from the rear boundary of the site.” 

 

The SEPP 1 objection seeks approval for the construction of a dwelling which proposes a rear setback of 0.93m. 

 

For corner allotments Development Control Plan (DCP) 2006 states that the rear setback is to be measured relative to the shortest residential boundary.  As shown in the site plan (see Appendix No.2) this is the north/south boundaries of the site.

 

In this case each dwelling has a different frontage to a street which provides for a different relationship to the property boundaries and the location of rear yards than that contemplated by the DCP.  Strict compliance with the rear setback requirement means that there is a non compliance as Unit B is only setback 0.93m from the northern boundary, where the garage is located.  This extent of encroachment is for the provision of the garage with the remainder of the dwelling being sited in excess of the minimum set back requirement.  Unit B addresses Waterfall Crescent and therefore the actual rear boundary for this unit is the eastern boundary.  The dwelling is setback 4.18m from this boundary which complies with the minimum setback for single storey dwellings.  

 

The submitted SEPP 1 objection provides the following justification to the proposed variation to the minimum rear setback. 

 

·        Retention of the established green corridor along the eastern property boundary;

·        The proposal specifically the encroachment would not compromise the amenity of the neighbouring properties;

·        The proposal takes advantage of the characteristic of a corner site by positioning the dwellings to address two street frontages;

·        The proposed layout has consideration for privacy, amenity and vehicular movements;

·        The proposal achieves the objectives of solar access;

·        The variation to the rear setback would not impact on the privacy of the occupants at 24 Waterfall Crescent and the proposed detached dual occupancy;

·        The proposal has taken advantage of the site characteristics and provided a satisfactory development incorporating privacy and amenity considerations, vehicular movements.

·        The proposed two-storey dwelling (Unit A) is positioned on the existing building platform.  This platform was created after considerable site excavation during construction of the existing dwelling and the platform is further restricted by an existing retaining wall along Mount Close.  The option of further excavation to achieve compliance would affect the topography and should be avoided.

 

The SEPP 1 objection is required to demonstrate that compliance with the aims and objectives of the relevant planning instrument and zone can still be achieved regardless of the variation to the development standard. 

 

The objectives for zone 2(b) Residential (Low Density) are as follows:

 

(i)         to reinforce the importance of natural landscape settings and areas with heritage conservation values, and

(ii)        to promote the established urban and landscape character of traditional residential subdivisions by limiting the range of permissible uses, and

(iii)       to allow a limited range of compatible non-residential uses.

 

The proposed dual occupancy has achieved these objectives by providing a site responsive development that compliments other dwellings in the surrounding area.  The proposal ensures that the front setback and streetscape character along both street frontages is enhanced by addressing each street frontage. 

 

Assessment of the SEPP 1 objection also needs to be considered against the objects stated in Section 5(a) (ii) of the EP&A Act which is as follows:

 

“(ii)  the promotion and co-ordination of the orderly and economic use and development of land

 

Despite variation to the rear setback, the proposal will ensure attainment of the objects of the EP&A Act as it represents the most logical configuration to achieve a site responsive detached dual occupancy development.

 

In the circumstance of this corner site and for the reasons outlined in the applicant’s submission, the SEPP 1 objection is supported.

Sydney REP No. 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River (SREP 20)

Stormwater run-off from the proposed development will be directed to Council’s existing stormwater drainage system in Hobart Street via stormwater drainage pipes. A below ground on-site stormwater detention system will also be provided on the site to temporarily store excess stormwater during more extreme rainfall events. Council’s Development Engineer has reviewed the proposed development with regard to stormwater drainage and is satisfied with this aspect of the proposal.

 

The proposed development is in accordance with the general planning considerations set out in Clause 5 of SREP 20 and the relevant specific planning policies and related recommended strategies relating to water quality and quantity. In particular, provision will be made for adequate erosion and sediment control measures to ensure sediment as a result of the development is not deposited in the Hawkesbury-Nepean River via the stormwater drainage system.

 

 

Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Land) (LEP 1998)

LEP 1998 is applicable to the site which is zoned 2(b) Residential (Low Density).  Dual occupancy development is permissible in this zone with development consent.  The following is an assessment of the proposal against the numerical standards of the LEP.

 

 

Standard

Proposed

Compliance

Clause 11

Minimum allotment size

650sqm

808sqm

Yes

Clause 12(3)

Building envelope

 

Unit A – two storey dwelling

 

Unit B – single storey dwelling

No (see comments below)

 

 

Yes

Clause 12(3)

Maximum external wall height

6.5m

Unit A = 5.5m

 

Unit B = 2.7m

Yes

 

Yes

Clause 12(3)

Landscaping

50%

57%

Yes

Clause 12(4)

Rear setback

Single storey = 4m

Unit B ranges from 0.93m to 5.58m

No (see SEPP 1)

 

The proposal is inconsistent with Clause 12(3) and (4) of the LEP due to encroachment into the building envelope and variation to the rear setback.  Variation to the rear setback has been addressed under SEPP 1.  Issues related to encroachment into the building envelope are addressed below:

 

Clause 12 Building Envelopes, heights, landscaped areas and rear boundary setbacks

This clause prescribes building envelope, external wall height, landscaped area and rear boundary setback requirements for developments that require consent in this zone.  The objectives are:

 

(a)        To ensure a site-responsive development at a scale which is compatible with existing housing in the locality by controlling visual impacts relating to height and bulk; and

(b)        To minimise the impact of loss of privacy, overshadowing and loss of views; and

(c)        To achieve an appropriate separation between buildings and site boundaries and preserve private open space corridors along rear fence lines; and

(d)        To protect and enhance the environmental features, which are characteristic of each of the residential zones, by requiring sufficient space on-site for effective landscaping and on-site stormwater detention.

 

Clause 12(6) states:

 

“despite any other provisions of this clause, the council may consent to a building which is not wholly within the relevant building envelope or contravenes the maximum wall height control if, in the opinion of the council, the application demonstrates that a variation to those controls is necessary to improve the design, external appearance or utility of the proposed building.”

 

The encroachment is a function of the topography of the site which falls 5m from the northeast to the southwest.  If the building were to be modified to comply with the building envelope control then there would be a significant amount of site modifications required which would detract from the building design and external appearance.  The minor encroachment into the building envelope permits greater utility for the dwelling so that internal living space and amenity are improved. 

 

Clause 14 of the LEP outlines the provision for design principles in development generally.  Council must not consent to development unless the proposed development has taken into account of contribution of the development to creating attractive streetscapes, local topography, and the provision of contemporary amenity standards. 

 

The proposal is consistent with this clause in relation to:

 

·       provision of a development that minimises the amount of cut and fill so that the development is consistent with local topography;

·       the applicant has designed the proposal to ensure front setback, scale, height, roof from and pitch, landscape provision and external finishes are sympathetic to the surrounding dwellings;

·       the solar access, visual and acoustic privacy of the occupants of the proposed dwellings and surrounding developments is maintained;

·       the proposal addresses both Mount Close and Waterfall Crescent;

·       the proposal would not obstruct any view corridors.

 

2.   Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) – Any Development Control Plan

Penrith Development Control Plan (DCP) 2006 Part 4 Section 4.3 – “Dual occupancy” is applicable to the site and the following sections are relevant to the assessment of the proposal. 

 

An assessment of the proposed dual occupancy against the numerical standards of Section 4.3 of the DCP indicated that the proposal complies with the numerical guidelines with the exception of articulation of external walls, cut and fill, eaves overhang and provision of external sun shading devices and pergolas.  Issues related to these variations are outlined in the table below.

 

 

Guideline

Proposed

Compliance

Clause 5.2 (4) Articulation of external walls

Suggest a maximum length of 5m walls but it is flexible subject to design

Unit A – front 8.25m, rear 11m

 

Unit B – side (south) 14.5m and rear 7m

No (see comments below)

 

No (see comments below)

Clause 5.6 (4) Cut and Fill

 

Maximum 500mm

700mm

No (see comments below)

Clause 6.4 (6) Overhanging eaves

Minimum 450mm wide

Nil

No (see comments below)

 

Articulation of external walls

The proposed variation from the maximum wall length requirement can be supported for the following reasons:

 

(a)     The applicant has incorporated window openings to these facades to minimise the building bulk.

(b)     The proposal is compliant with other requirements in relation to

o   Both dwellings are orientated to address Mount Close and Waterfall Crescent with extensive private courtyards to the rear;

o   The design of Unit A and Unit B provides a 5m separation;

o   The garage is integrated with the design of each dwelling and landscaping is provided adjacent to the driveway.

(c)     The southern elevation of Unit B and the northern elevation of Unit A are not visible from the street and surrounding developments and therefore would have minimal impact on the streetscape.

(d)     The applicant has minimised the roof pitch and floor to ceiling height to reduce the building bulk.

(e)     Further amendment to the proposal to achieve compliance might affect the function of the rooms and the amenity.

(f)      The existing vegetation and proposed landscaping will provide screening to the development and minimise the building bulk.

 

Cut and Fill

The proposed 700mm to the southwest corner of Unit B is inconsistent with the maximum cut and fill requirement, however it can be supported for the following reasons:

 

(a)     This inconsistency is mainly a function of the fall of the site.

(b)     It is restricted to a small portion of the master bedroom to maintain a consistent finished floor level with the rest of the dwelling.

(c)     This variation would not impact on the streetscape and residential amenity of the surrounding development as it would not give rise to excessive building bulk nor increase overshadowing.

 

Overhanging eaves

Although the proposal is inconsistent with the minimum eave overhand requirement, it can be supported for the following reasons:

 

·        The private courtyards are oriented to the north and east such that shading is not necessary and frontages facing west are minimised. 

·        A BASIX Certificate is submitted with the application in accordance with State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004.  The applicant has nominated water, thermal comfort and energy commitments in the Certificate to ensure a sustainable development. 

 

In this case, further amendments to comply with the DCP are not necessary.

 

3.   Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of the Development

The development generally complies with the objectives of the planning controls and the impacts of the development are expected to be minimal.  The likely impacts of the proposed development upon the surrounding area are discussed as follows:

 

Context and setting

Developments in the area are predominantly residential single and two storey dwellings of different styles and construction.  To ensure the proposal is sympathetic to the established characteristics of the locality the applicant proposes a mix of single and two-storey dwellings and has designed the proposal to comply with the majority of the design and numerical requirements and incorporated features of the existing built environment. 

 

Site design and internal design

The development represents a form of infill development and it has responded to the site constraints in a manner that results in residential development that is consistent with the existing built form.  The internal layout of the proposed dwellings would also maximise residential amenity.  Issues related to encroachment into the building envelope and variations to the rear setback and external wall length have been addressed earlier. 

 

Council’s Tree Management Officer reviewed the proposal specifically in relation to the removal of two street trees.  No objection is raised subject to details for the removal of the Bottlebrush tree being submitted with the application for the driveway crossover for Unit A.  Furthermore, the proposed stormwater line servicing Unit A shall be repositioned to minimise damage to the Poplar tree on the nature strip.  The remaining existing street trees are to be retained and protected (see recommended Standard Conditions 3.1 – L007 and L008).

 

4.   Section 79C(1)(c) – The Suitability of the Site for the Development

In view of the assessment, Council can be satisfied that the site is suitable for the proposed development for the following reasons:

 

·          the proposal is a permissible land use in the zone and is compatible with the surrounding residential developments;

·          the total site area is adequate for the provision of an additional dwelling to meet the housing demand in the locality;

·          the site is readily serviced by shops, schools and public transport, water, sewerage and drainage;

·          the site is not subject to flooding, contamination and bushfire;

·          the site enables design for high levels of residential amenity including solar access, visual and acoustic privacy, climatic comfort and safety and security and would not compromise that of the adjoining properties;

·          the site would promote diversity in housing type;

·          the site being a corner block enables positioning of the dwellings to address both street frontages and maintain the streetscape;

·          the site enables continuation of the green corridor along the rear boundary.

 

 

 

5.   Section 79C(1)(d) – Any Submissions made in relation to the Development

The application was referred to Council’s Senior Development Engineer, Team Leader – Building Regulations and Tree Management Officer who raised no objection to the proposal.

 

Community Consultation

In accordance with Chapter 2.7 of the Penrith Development Control Plan for the City of Penrith 2006 – “Notification and Advertising”, the proposed development was exhibited from 1 March to 15 March 2010 and fourteen owners and occupiers of the adjoining properties were notified of the proposal and invited to make comments.  No submissions were received. 

 

Section 94 Contributions

The following Section 94 Contribution Plans apply to the proposal and the calculations are below:

 

·       Penrith City Council Development Contributions Plan Cultural Facilities

·       Penrith City District Open Space Facilities Development Contributions Plan

·       Penrith City Council Section 94 Plan Footpath Construction in the Established Residential Areas of the City

·       Penrith City Local Open Space Development Contributions Plan

 

S.94 Contribution Plan

Contribution Rate x Calculation rate

Total

Cultural facilities

3 x $109

$327

District Open Space

3.1 x $1,627

$5,044

Footpaths

3 x $76

$228

Local open Space

3.1 x $589

$1,826

 

Net Total

$7,425.00

 

Conclusion

The subject development application seeks approval to construct a detached dual occupancy and is supported by a SEPP 1 objection seeking variation to the minimum rear setback requirement. 

 

The proposal represents a permissible use in the zone and meets the minimum site area requirement.  The SEPP 1 objection is supported as it has been demonstrated that the minimum rear setback requirement is unnecessary in this case and that the attainment of the objects of Clause 5(a) of the EP&A Act will not be hindered by the proposal. 

 

The development is considered because of the following reasons;

 

(a)     The minimum rear setback variation and the proposed dual occupancy are unlikely to have any significant impacts on the amenity of the locality; 

(b)     The proposed development complies with the objectives of the relevant planning instrument as outlined above and a site responsive dual occupancy is considered to have been achieved;

(c)     The site is suitable for the proposal and no concerns have been raised by adjoining owners/residents.

 

It is recommended the SEPP 1 objection be supported and the development application be approved subject to the attached conditions.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.      The information contained in the report on Development Application No. 10/0178 - Proposed detached dual occupancy at Lot 736 DP 717440 (No.1) Mount Close, Cranebrook be received.

2.      The submitted SEPP 1 be supported.

3.      Development Application No DA10/0178 for the removal of trees, demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of a detached dual occupancy and associated landscaping be approved subject to the following proposed conditions:

 

Standard Conditions

3.1     A001 – Approved plans that are architecturally drawn

A008 – Works to BCA requirements

A019 – Occupation Certificate

A043 - Air conditioner for existing dwelling

A046 – Issue of Construction Certificate

B001 - Demolition of existing structures

B002 - AS for demolition and disposal to approved landfill site

B003 - Asbestos

B004 - Dust

B005 - Mud/Soil

B006 - Hours of work

D001 – Sedimentation and Erosion Controls

D005 - No filling without prior approval

D006 - No filling without prior approval

D009 – Covering Waste Storage area

D014 - Plant and equipment noise

G003 - Section 73 Certificate

G004- Integral Energy

H001 – Stamped plans and erection of site notice

H002 - All forms of construction

H010 - Fill details (no cut)

H022 - Survey

H036 – Rainwater tank

H037 – Safe supply from catchment

H038 – Connection of rainwater tank supply

H039 – Rainwater tank pumps

H041 – Hours of work

L001 – General landscaping

L002 - Landscape construction

L003 - Report requirement

L004 - Bond for landscape works

L005 - Planting of plant material

L006 - AS requirements

L007 - Tree protection measures–no TMP with DA

L008 – Tree preservation order

L010 - Retain existing trees (no tree bond required

N003 - Section 94 contribution

N004 - Section 94 contribution

N005 - Section 94 contribution

N006 - Section 94 contribution

Q001F – Notice of Commencement & Appointment of PCA

Special Conditions

3.2     Reposition the stormwater line connecting Unit A to the street drainage system to avoid encroachment and damage to the critical root zone of the Poplar tree on the nature strip.

 

3.3     All civil works shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works and applicable Australian Standards.

 

3.4     All drainage works and works in the road reserve required to effect the consented development shall be undertaken at no cost to Penrith City Council.

 

3.5     Retaining walls higher than 900mm shall be designed, the construction supervised and certified by a suitably qualified structural engineer.

 

3.6     Any Construction Certificate issued by the Principal Certifying Authority or Certifying Authority shall incorporate plans and details for erosion and sediment control in accordance with the Department of Housing’s “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004.

 

3.7     The stacked carparking space for Unit B shall comply with the Australian Standard (AS2890.1-2004) for longitudinal grade of 5%. Evidence of compliance with AS2890 shall be submitted for approval prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

3.8     Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate a Roads Act application, including payment of appropriate application and inspection fees shall be lodged with  Penrith City Council, as the Roads Authority, for the following works:

 

(a)     Provision of 2 vehicular crossings.

(b)     Provision of private drainage connection to Council’s road drainage system.

(c)     Removal of redundant vehicular crossings and reinstatement of kerb and gutter.

(d)     Opening the road reserve for the provision of services including stormwater.

(e)     Placing of hoardings, containers, waste skips, etc. in the road reserve.

(f)      Replacement of damaged kerb and gutter for the full property frontage.

 

All works within the road reserve shall be carried out in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.

 

Penrith City Council (being the Roads Authority under the Roads Act) shall approve the works completed on or over the road reserve.  Contact Council’s City Works Department on (02) 4732 7777 to arrange an inspection of the works (and payment of inspection fees, if required).

 

3.9     A Construction Certificate shall be issued by a Certifying Authority to include the following civil works.

 

(a)     Stormwater drainage

(b)     Sealed pavement for all areas of vehicular access.

 

Civil design drawings shall be prepared strictly in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works and applicable Australian Standards.

 

3.10   Stormwater drainage from the site shall be discharged to the street drainage system.

 

The ground surface in the courtyard of Unit B has a trapped low point in the vicinity of the rear sliding door of Unit B. The ground surface shall be graded to fall to the east and south or shall be drained with pit and pipe so as not to cause ponding.

 

The proposed stormwater drainage system shall be designed to ensure no adverse impact on adjoining properties by the diversion or concentration of stormwater flows.

 

The proposed method of stormwater discharge shall be detailed in the Construction Certificate issued by the Certifying Authority.

 

3.11   Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority shall ensure that vehicular access, pedestrian access, carparking (including stacked carparking) and manoeuvring areas associated with the subject development are in accordance with AS 2890.1 and Penrith City Council’s Development Control Plan.

 

3.12   The garage for Unit A shall comply with Council’s Development Control Plan – 2006 in that the double garage shall have a clear internal dimension free from obstruction of 5.8m.

 

3.13   The garage for Unit B shall comply with Council’s Development Control Plan – 2006 in that the single garage shall have a clear internal dimension free from obstruction of 3.2m.

 

3.14   Prior to the commencement of works on site, including approved clearing of site vegetation, erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed. The erosion and sediment control measures are to be installed in accordance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan(s) for the development and the Department of Housing’s “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004.

 

3.15   Prior to commencement of works a Traffic Control Plan including details for pedestrian management,  shall be prepared in accordance with AS1742.3 “Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads” and the Roads and Traffic Authority’s publication “Traffic Control at Worksites” and certified by an appropriately accredited Roads and Traffic Authority Traffic Controller.

 

Traffic control measures shall be implemented during the construction phase of the development in accordance with the certified plan.  A copy of the plan shall be available on site at all times.

 

Note:  A copy of the Traffic Control Plan shall accompany the Notice of Commencement to Penrith City Council.

 

3.16   Prior to the Commencement of Works a dilapidation report of all Council owned infrastructure fronting the development in Waterfall Crescent and Mount Close is to be submitted to Penrith City Council.  The report is to include, but not limited to, footpaths, kerb and gutter, pavement and street trees and is to extend 10m either side of the development.

 

3.17   Erosion and sediment control measures shall remain in place and be maintained until all disturbed areas have been rehabilitated and stabilised.

 

3.18   Prior to the connection of private drainage to Council’s drainage system, an inspection is to be carried out by Penrith City Council’s Development Engineering Unit. A fee will be charged in accordance with Council’s adopted Fees and Charges, and is to be paid prior to the inspection.

 

3.19   All filling shall be undertaken in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works and AS 3798.

 

3.20   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall ensure that all works within the road reserve have been inspected and approved by Penrith City Council.

 

3.21   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate any damage to Council infrastructure not identified in the dilapidation report, as a result of the development shall be restored under the supervision of Penrith City Council.  Any rectification works within Waterfall Crescent and Mount Close will require a Roads Act application.  The application is to be submitted and approved by Penrith City Council prior to such works commencing.

 

3.22   The footways shall be turfed for the full frontage of the site.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

Locality Map

1 Page

Appendix

2. View

Site Plan

1 Page

Appendix

3. View

Landscape Plan

1 Page

Appendix

4. View

Shadow Diagram

1 Page

Appendix

  


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 1 - Locality Map

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 2 - Site Plan

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 3 - Landscape Plan

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 4 - Shadow Diagram

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A City of Opportunities

 

 

 

5

Development Application DA09/1122 - Proposed (6) x Attic Style Villas at Lot 101 DP 243599 (No. 27) Hobart Street , Oxley Park  Applicant:  Ultra Design and Engineering;  Owner:  Sam Hassan    

DA09/1122

Compiled by:                Ashlee Cutter, Trainee Environmental Planner

Authorised by:             Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager   

 

Objective

We have access to what we need

Community Outcome

A City with lifestyle and housing choice in our neighbourhoods (8)

Strategic Response

Encourage housing that provides choice, achieves design excellence, and meets community needs (8.1)

      

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

Executive Summary

Council is in receipt of a development application for the construction of a six attic style villas. The application seeks to vary the minimum rear setback requirement of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 Urban Lands. The application is supported by an objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 to the development standard.

 

The proposed development comprises six attic style villas each consisting of 2 bedrooms, kitchen, family room, dining, bathroom, ensuite and attached single garage. The site is located on the southern side of Hobart Street. The site is irregular in shape with the street frontage being narrower than the rear boundary.

 

The SEPP 1 objection has demonstrated that full compliance with the minimum rear setback requirement is unreasonable and unnecessary due to the ability of the development to meet the objectives of the planning instrument and consistency with other buildings in the immediate locality. The development is unlikely to have any significant impacts on the amenity of the locality.

 

In accordance with the reporting procedures required by the Department of Planning, the matter is forwarded to Council for determination. The report recommends that the SEPP1 objection be supported and the development application be approved.

Site and Surrounds

The subject site is located at on the southern side of Hobart Street. The site is irregular in shape with a street frontage onto Hobart Street of 16.45 metres, a depth of up to 61.85 metres, a rear boundary length of 38.22 metres and creating a total site area of 1340m2. The site contains a slope slightly down to the north-east towards the street. A single dwelling is currently located on the site and is proposed to be demolished (see Appendix No. 1).

 

The surrounding area is characterised by residential development, including a mixture of older‑style single dwellings and more recent dual occupancy and multi-unit housing developments.

The Proposed Development

The application proposes the following:

 

- Demolition of the existing single-storey dwelling-house and related structures;

- Construction of a multi-unit housing development consisting of 6 x two (2) bedroom units. Each unit consists of a kitchen, family room, dining, bathroom, ensuite, laundry and attached single garage;

- Access to the development is to be provided off Hobart Street with a minimum 5.5m setback to the built form;

- The minimum rear (southern) boundary setback is 4.25m for the ground floor and a SEPP 1 Objection has been lodged for Council’s consideration;

- The minimum side (eastern) boundary setback is 2.063m. The external building materials of the proposed development will be a mix of cement rendered brick and tiled roofing;

- 1 visitor car parking space is provided between Units 3 and 4 and 3 additional uncovered spaces provided on site;

- Removal of 1 existing tree from the site;

- Related site excavation works, landscaping and stormwater drainage works, including the provision of a below ground on-site stormwater detention system;

- An on – site detention system located within the driveway area to collect excess stormwater; and

 

The development application was accompanied by:

 

·    An objection under the State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 Development Standards to the rear setback requirement under Council’s Local Environmental Plan 1998 Urban Lands

·    Statement of Environmental Effects;

·    Acoustic Report;

·    Site and Building Plans;

·    BASIX certificate; and

·    Waste Management Plan.

Planning Assessment

The development has been assessed in accordance with the matters for consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and having regard to those matters; the following issues have been identified for further consideration.

1.   Section 79C(1)(a)(i) – Any Environmental Planning Instrument

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards (SEPP 1)

The proposed development does not comply with Council’s development standard relating to the minimum rear boundary setback of a building under Clause 12(4) of Penrith LEP 1998 (Urban Land). In this regard, a 4.25m rear boundary setback has been provided to the southern property boundary, however, as the proposed development is a two storey building, 6m is required to be provided by in accordance with this clause.

 

An objection to development standards within Penrith LEP 1998 has been lodged.

 

SEPP 1 seeks to provide flexibility in the application of planning controls where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances or tend to hinder the attainment of the objectives stated in Section 5 (a) (i) and (ii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. These objectives relate to the proper management of resources to promote the welfare of the community and environment, and, to promote the orderly and economic use of development of the land.

 

The variation proposes a departure of 29.16% from the development standard for the affected portion of the development. The portion of the building which encroaches into the rear setback is confined to the ground floor area only, the first floor achieves a rear setback of 6m which is consistent with clause 12(4).

 

The applicant submitted a SEPP 1 objection and is considered as follows;

 

Development Standard

The SEPP 1 objection is required to demonstrate that compliance with the aims and objectives of the relevant planning instrument and zone can still be achieved regardless of the variation to the development standard.

 

The objectives for the 2(c) Residential (Low Medium Density) are as follows:

 

(i)         to reinforce the importance of the natural landscape settings and areas with heritage conservation value; and

(ii)        to protect the character of traditional cottage development and streetscapes; and

(iii)       to consolidate population and housing densities; and

(iv)       to expand housing choices by allowing multi-unit housing with a single storey appearance; and

(v)        to promote a variety of housing types or forms upon the site of each proposed development; and

(vi)       to allow a range of compatible non-residential uses.

 

The dwelling achieves these objectives by providing a site responsive development that compliments the surrounding area and minimises impacts on adjoining properties. The proposed development will not have any adverse affect on the character of the streetscape and is consistent with the adjoining development. The proposal aims to increase housing density in accordance with the above objectives by providing multi unit housing.

 

The applicants SEPP1 objection prepared by Innovation Planning, justifying the variation to the minimum rear setback, stating that the objection may be considered on the premise that the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary on the following basis:

 

-        “Due to the shape of the block, and its narrow width and L shape, it is almost impossible to contain the buildings strictly within the building envelope, or achieve the required rear setback – which also impacts on the amount of landscaped area that can be provided;

 

-        The proposal satisfied all objectives for the clause and for the zone; and

 

-        The proposal makes efficient use of the site, which does not contain any resource requiring conservation. The social and economic welfare of the community will be improved through the provision of more affordable housing in the area.”

 

Section 5 - Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

Assessment of the SEPP 1 objection also needs to be considered against the objectives stated in Section 5(a) (ii) of the EP&A Act which is as follows:

 

“(ii) the promotion and co-ordination of the orderly and economic use and development of land

 

It is considered that the proposed development and associated rear setback will ensure attainment of the objectives of section (ii) and refusal would be unreasonable in this regard for the following reasons:

 

·    The proposed development does not hinder the attainment of the objectives of Section 5(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.

·    The proposed multi unit housing is a good development for the site.

·    The proposal satisfies the objectives of the zone.

 

For reasons discussed above, it is recommended the SEPP 1 objection be supported.

Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Land)

The subject site is zoned 2(c) Residential (Low Medium Density) under Penrith LEP 1998 (Urban Land). The proposed development is defined as “multi-unit housing”, which is permissible with the consent of Council in the 2(c) zone.

 

The objectives of the zone have been discussed above in Section 1 and considered to be achieved by the proposed development.

 

The proposed development has been assessed against the relevant development standards contained in the LEP relating to multi-unit housing and development generally in the 2(c) Residential (Low Medium Density) zone, as detailed below.

 

Development Standard

Requirement

Proposed

Compliance

Cl.11(4) - Lot Size

800m2

1,340m2

Yes.

Cl.11(4) - Lot Width

15m

Minimum 16.46m

Yes.

Cl.12(3) - Building Envelope

1.8m from side property boundary and 45o height plane.

The roof structure of Units 1, 4 and 6 are not contained within the building envelope.

Partially. Refer to discussion regarding Clause 12(6).

Cl.12(3) - External Wall Height

3.5m

Max 3.5m

Yes.

Cl.12(3) - Landscaped Area

40%

546.8m2 = 40.8%

Yes.

Cl.12(4) - Rear Setback

6m

4.25m to ground floor, 6m to first floor (southern boundary)

No. Refer to discussion regarding SEPP 1.

Cl.13(2) - Solar Access

§ 3 hours direct sun to living areas.

§ 3 hours direct sun to neighbouring living areas.

§ Ceiling insulated to R3.0.

§ Walls insulated to R1.5.

§ Shading devices.

§ Yes.

 

§ Yes.

 

 

§ Energy efficiency requirements addressed via BASIX Certificate.

Yes.

 

Clause 12(6) – Building Envelope

Council may consent to a building which is not wholly within the relevant building envelope if the application demonstrates that a variation to the control is necessary to improve the design, external appearance or utility of the proposed building. The roof structure of units 1, 4 and 6 are not contained within the required building envelope, with a minor encroachment by the roof eaves and in the case of unit 4 a dormer window. It is considered that this non‑compliance is only minor and strict compliance would be unreasonable.

 

Clause 14 – General Design Principles

 

The proposed development is consistent with the general design principles detailed in this clause and relating to protection of local topography, streetscape and character, compatibility with the scale and design of neighbouring development and provision of contemporary standards of amenity within dwellings and open space areas. The development does not proposal filling in excess of 400mm.

 

Clause 28 – Tree Preservation

 

The tree proposed to be removed will not have an impact on the streetscape as it is relatively small in size and setback approximately 30m from the street frontage. The proposed level of tree removal is considered appropriate in the circumstances as the proposed landscaping works for the site will more than compensate for the removal of this tree.

 

Clause 32 – Flood Liable Land

 

The subject land is not flood liable or adjacent to flood liable land.

Sydney REP No. 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River (SREP 20)

Stormwater run-off from the proposed development will be directed to Council’s existing stormwater drainage system in Hobart Street via stormwater drainage pipes. A below ground on-site stormwater detention system will also be provided on the site to temporarily store excess stormwater during more extreme rainfall events. Council’s Development Engineer has reviewed the proposed development with regard to stormwater drainage and is satisfied with this aspect of the proposal.

 

The proposed development is in accordance with the general planning considerations set out in Clause 5 of SREP 20 and the relevant specific planning policies and related recommended strategies relating to water quality and quantity. In particular, provision will be made for adequate erosion and sediment control measures to ensure sediment as a result of the development is not deposited in the Hawkesbury-Nepean River via the stormwater drainage system.

 

2.   Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) – Any Development Control Plan

Penrith Development Control Plan 2006

Section 2.4 Erosion and Sediment Control

The proposed development includes provision for strategies to manage and minimise erosion and sedimentation during the course of the development works.

Section 2.6 Landscape

The application has been accompanied by a landscape plan for the site which will provide for the high-quality embellishment of the site by suitable ground covers, shrubs and trees which, at maturity, will complement the height, scale, design and function of the proposed development.

The landscaping plan proposes landscaping along all property boundaries, particularly screen planting consisting of the following is to be implemented along the eastern and southern boundaries:

Kunza Ambigua              3m in height

Melaleuca Nodosa         3m in height

Camellia Sasanqau          2m in height

Hakea Sericea                3m in height 

Once established this type of planting is considered to maximise privacy between the proposed units and the adjacent neighbours

Section 2.9 Waste Planning

The application has been accompanied by a waste management plan which suitably describes the likely waste generation of the proposal and identifies appropriate actions to mange the generation, storage and disposal of wastes. Suitable provision has been made for the storage of waste and recycling bins on the site.

Section 2.11 Car Parking

Multi-unit housing apartments are required to be provided with 1.5 resident car spaces for each 2 bedroom unit. The proposed development complies with this requirement in that provision has been made for a single attached garage in each unit, 3 uncovered spaces and a visitor space provided on site. As a result, a total of 10 car spaces are provided in accordance with this section. The proposed driveway makes provision for sufficient turning areas to enable vehicles to enter and exit the basement car park in a forward direction.

 

Section 4.4 Residential –Villa Style Development

 

The proposed development has been assessed against Council’s development controls for Villa Style development. The following table summarises the key development controls applicable to the proposed development and the proposal’s compliance with these controls.

 

Development Control

Requirement

Compliance

5.3 Front and Rear Setbacks

§ Front setback to match adjoining developments or 5.5m minimum.

§ Rear setback 6m for 2-storey and 4m for single-storey.

§ Yes 5.5m to Hobart Street .

§ Refer to note below regarding front and secondary setbacks.

5.4 Driveways and Parking

Resident Parking:

§ 1.5 spaces per 2 bed unit = 9

Visitor Parking:

§ 1 space per 5 units = 1

10 car spaces provided.

5.5 Landscaped Area

§ 40% of site area.

§ Yes (40.8%).

 

5.6 Building Envelope and Side Setbacks

§ Maximum roof pitch 35o.

§ Minimum 2m side setbacks.

§ Yes.

§ Yes (2.063m to eastern property boundary and 2.201m western property boundary).

5.7 Solar Planning

§ 3 hours solar access to living areas.

§ 3 hours solar access to 40% of private open space.

§ Yes.

 

§ Yes.

6.3 Building Design

§ Incorporate a variety of architectural features to minimise bulk and scale.

§ Yes.

6.5 Design of Dwellings and Private Courtyards

§ Minimum 25m² private open space with 5m x 4m dimensions.

§ Yes.

 

6.9 Fences and Retaining Walls

§ Maximum 1.8m high fencing (2.4m on sloping sites).

§ Maximum 1.2m high fencing forward of building line.

§ Yes.

 

 

§ To be conditioned.

6.10 Visual and Acoustic Privacy and Outlook

§ Consider window locations.

§ Bedrooms designed away from noisy rooms.

§ Active and passive living areas separated.

§ A range of measures will be provided to maintain adequate levels of privacy and acoustic amenity.

 

Clause 5.6 Building Envelope and Side Setbacks

 

- The proposed development is compliant with this clause as:

- Cut and fill is restricted to approximately 400mm which is less than the 500mm maximum:

- The minor encroachment to the building envelope is substantially contained to the roof structure and eaves;

- Reasonable separation is provided between each unit through the use of private open space areas and car parking; and

- A minimum setback of 2m is provided for a distance less than 50% of the boundary.

 

Clause 5.7 Solar Planning

 

Shadow diagrams were provided to Council on the 31 May 2010 which demonstrated that proposed development provides a minimum of 3 hours sunlight between 9am and 3pm on 21 June, to 40% of the main private open spaces of the dwelling and main private open spaces of any adjoining dwellings which is consistent with this clause.

 

Clause 6.10 Visual and Acoustic Privacy and Outlook

 

An acoustic report was provided by a suitably qualified consultant and the recommendations contained in the report have formed conditions of consent. The application report was referred to Councils Environment Officer to comment, the acoustic report was reviewed and found to be satisfactory to Council’s requirements.

 

Clause 6.13 Storage and Services

 

Provision for garbage bin storage is provided to each dwelling within the private open space area and is therefore found to satisfy these controls.

 

3.   Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of the Development

The development generally complies with the objectives of the planning controls and the impacts of the development are expected to be minimal. The proposed development is consistent with the existing residential amenity of the surrounding area and will maintain a consistent bulk and scale with adjoining development. Appropriate building treatments are to be incorporated into the design of the proposed development through varied rooflines, horizontal and vertical proportions, building articulation and a suitable mix of external building materials. These measures will ensure that the proposed development will be compatible within the existing residential environment.

Existing surrounding development contains a mixture of older‑style single dwellings and more recent dual occupancy and multi-unit housing developments. The proposal ensures that it will be consistent with the existing residential streetscape while ensuring that the desired future character of the area will not be diminished as outlined in Council’s LEP.

 

Landscaping will be provided as part of the proposal. A number of advanced planting ground covers, shrubs and trees as well as grass covers will be provided within the site in order to ensure that the proposed development will contribute to the established garden character of the street.

 

Stormwater is to be directed to the stormwater easement via a rainwater tank, minimising impacts on adjoining properties. Appropriate conditions are to be included relating to site management during construction. An appropriate waste management plan has been provided. Hours of work and construction noise will also be subject to consent conditions.

 

4.   Section 79C(1)(c) – The Suitability of the Site for the Development

The proposed development is considered to be compatible with the surrounding area. Multi unit housing is permissible within the zone with development consent. The proposal ensures that the existing residential amenity is maintained through compliance with Council’s LEP and DCP. Whilst there is a rear setback variation required for the proposed development, the proposal is considered to address and satisfy the objectives of the relevant planning documents.

 

5.   Section 79C(1)(d) – Any Submissions made in relation to the Development

The application was referred to the following departments within Council:

 

Referral

Comment

§ Building Surveyor

No objection, subject to recommended conditions of consent

§ Development Engineer

No objection to proposed on-site detention system, subject to recommended conditions of consent.

§ Environmental Officer

No objection, subject to recommended conditions of consent to mitigate noise from railline.

 

In accordance with Section 2.7 Notification and Advertising of Penrith DCP 2006, the proposed development was advertised in the local newspapers and notified to the owners and occupiers of adjoining and nearby properties. The first exhibition period for the proposal was from 11 November 2009 to 25 November 2009. Two exhibition site notices were also placed on the site. Council notified 20 property owners and occupiers in the surrounding area and received one submission in relation to the proposal.

 

The second exhibition period for the proposal was from 30 June 2010 to 14 July 2010 and arose due to plan amendments. Council once again notified 18 property owners and occupiers in the surrounding area but received no submissions in relation to the revised proposal.

 

The following issues were raised in the submission received by Council during the first exhibition period and this has formed part of the assessment:

 

Issue raised in the submission

Comment

§ Noise

See Section 2 - 6.10 of the report

§ Tree removal

See Section 1- 28  of the report

§ Privacy

See Section 2 -2.6 and 6.9 of the report

§ Rubbish

See Section 2 - 6.13 of the report

§ Solar access

See Section 2 - 5.7 of the report

6.   Section 79C(1)(e) – The Public Interest

 

The proposed development is in the public interest as it has been notified and advertised with suitable timeframes given for submission from members of the public. Further, access to the site is adequate for occupants of the site. There is adequate street parking for visitors to the site.

Section 94 Contributions

The following Section 94 calculations apply to the proposed development.

 

S.94 Contribution Plan

Contribution Rate x Calculation rate

Total

Footpath

11.4 x 76.00

866.00

Cultural

11.4 x 109.00

1243.00

District Open Space

8.9 x 1,627.00

14,480.00

Local Open Space

8.9 x 589.00

5,242.00

 

NET TOTAL

$21,831.00

Conclusion

The subject development application seeks approval to construct a two storey dwelling and is supported by a SEPP 1 objection seeking a variation to the minimum rear setback requirement.

The SEPP 1 objection is supported as it has been demonstrated that the minimum rear setback requirement is unreasonable in this case and that the attainment of the objectives of Clause 5(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act will not be hindered by the proposal.

 

The development is considered satisfactory under the heads of consideration of Section 79(C) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.

 

The minimum rear setback variation and the proposal are unlikely to have any significant impacts on the amenity of the locality.

 

Whilst the proposed development application requires a variation to the minimum rear setback, it is considered to comply with the objectives of the relevant planning instruments as outlined above and a site responsive dwelling is considered to have been achieved.

 

As such, it is recommended the SEPP 1 objection be supported and the development application be approved subject to the attached conditions.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.       The information contained in the report on Development Application DA09/1122 Proposed a six attic style villas at Lot 101 DP 243599 (No. 27) Hobart Street, Oxley Park be received.

2.       The SEPP 1 objection relating to the minimum rear setback be supported.

3.       Development Application 09/1122 seeking consent for the construction of a six attic style villas at 27 Hobart Street, Oxley Park be approved subject to the attached conditions:

3.1.        Standard Conditions

A001 - Approved Plans

A008 – Works to BCA requirements

A009 – Residential Works DCP

A019 – Occupation Certificate

A046 – Obtain Construction Certificate

A043 – Air Conditioner

B001 – Demolition of Existing dwelling

B002 – Demolition Standards

B003 – Asbestos

B004 – Dust

B005 – Mud/Soil

B006 – Hours of Work

D001 – Sediment and Erosion Control Measures

D002 – Spray Grass

D005 – No Filling without approval

D007 – Filling of Land

D009 – Covering Waste Storage area

D010 – Waste disposal

D014 – Plant and Equipment Noise

E001 – BCA compliance

E005 – Smoke Alarms

F006 – Water Tank

G003 – Section 73 Certificate

G004 – Integral Energy

G005 – Rainwater Tank – Plumbing

H01F – Stamped plans and erection of site notice

H002 - All forms of construction

H011 – Engineering plans and specifications

H013 – Further details of building components

H014 – Slabs/Footings

H015 – Termite protection

H022 – Survey

H024 – Glass Installation

H030 – Roof colours

H034 – Bushfire-Proof Sarking

H036 – Rainwater Tank

H037 – Safe Supply of Water

H038 – Connection of Rainwater

H039 – Rainwater Tank Pumps

H041 – Hours of work

I003 – Road Act Approval

K016 – Stormwater

L001 – Landscaping Requirements

L002 – Landscaping Construction

L003 – Landscaping Report

L005 – Plant Material

L006 – Landscaping Standards

L008 - Tree Preservation Order

N001 – Section 94 Contributions

P001 – Costs

P002 – Fees

Q001 – Notice of commencement and appointment of PCA

Q005 - Occupation Certificate

Q010 – Basix Commitments

Q05f – Occupation Certificate

Special Conditions

3.2.      Noise levels from the premises shall not exceed the relevant noise criteria detailed in the Acoustic Report prepared by West & Associates Pty Ltd dated 30July 2007, Issue A and numbered 07160. The recommendations provided in the above-mentioned acoustic report shall be implemented and incorporated into the design and construction of the development, and shall be shown on plans accompanying the Construction Certificate application.

A certificate is to be obtained from a qualified acoustic consultant certifying that the building has been constructed to meet the noise criteria in accordance with the relevant Legislation, Guidelines and Australian Standards. This certificate is to be submitted and approved by Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

The provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 apply to the development, in terms of regulating offensive noise.

3.3.      Noise during the construction stage of the development is to comply with the relevant provisions of the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water’s Interim Construction Noise Guidelines.

3.4.      Boundary fencing is to be constructed of Colorbond to a height of 1.8 metres in accordance with Part 4.4 Villa Style Development of Penrith Development Control Plan 2006.

3.5.      Emergency Vehicle access shall be provided to the development in accordance with the NSW Fire Brigades Policy No. 4 – Guidelines for Emergency Vehicle Access. External fire hydrants may also have to be provided within the development to the satisfaction of the NSW Fire Brigades should the street hydrant coverage be inadequate.

Documentary evidence to indicate compliance with the requirements of the NSE Fire Brigades in regard to emergency vehicle access and hydrant coverage shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

3.6.      All civil works shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works and applicable Australian Standards.

3.7.      Any Construction Certificate issued by the Principal Certifying Authority or Certifying Authority shall incorporate plans and details for erosion and sediment control in accordance with the Department of Housing’s “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004.

3.8.      Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate a Roads Act application, including payment of appropriate application and inspection fees shall be lodged with  Penrith City Council, as the Roads Authority, for the following works:

(a)   Provision of a heavy-duty vehicular crossing.

(b)   Removal of redundant vehicular crossings and reinstatement of kerb and gutter.

(c)   Opening the road reserve for the provision of services including stormwater.

(d)   Placing of hoardings, containers, waste skips, etc. in the road reserve.

 

                                    All works within the road reserve shall be carried out in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.

Penrith City Council (being the Roads Authority under the Roads Act) shall approve the works completed on or over the road reserve.  Contact Council’s City Works Department on (02) 4732 7777 to arrange an inspection of the works (and payment of inspection fees, if required).

 

3.9.      A Construction Certificate shall be issued by a Certifying Authority to include the following civil works.

(a)   On-site detention system

(b)   Stormwater drainage

(c)   Sealed pavement for all areas of vehicular access.

 

Civil design drawings shall be prepared strictly in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works and applicable Australian Standards.

 

3.10.    Stormwater drainage from the site shall be discharged to the:

(a)   Street drainage system

 

The proposed stormwater drainage system shall be designed to ensure no adverse impact on adjoining properties by the diversion or concentration of stormwater flows.

 

The proposed method of stormwater discharge shall be detailed in the Construction Certificate issued by the Certifying Authority.

 

3.11.    On-site detention shall be provided generally in accordance with the concept plan/s lodged for development approval, prepared by Ultra Design & Engineers titled Stormwater Plan & Details, reference AR’084 Stormwater, issue B dated 30/03/2010.

Only one orifice plate is to be provided at the outlet of the on site detention tank.

 

All internal pits are to have a minimum of 50mm freeboard above the top water level of the emergency overflow from the on site detention tank.

 

Engineering plans and supporting calculations for the on-site detention system are to be prepared by a qualified Hydrologic/Hydraulic Engineer and shall accompany the application for a Construction Certificate.

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority shall ensure that the on-site detention system has been designed in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.

3.12.    Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority shall ensure that vehicular access, pedestrian access, carparking and manoeuvring areas associated with the subject development are in accordance with AS 2890.1, AS2890.2 and Penrith City Council’s Development Control Plan.

3.13.    Prior to the commencement of works on site, including approved clearing of site vegetation, erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed. The erosion and sediment control measures are to be installed in accordance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan(s) for the development and the Department of Housing’s “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004.

3.14.    Prior to the Commencement of Works a dilapidation report of all Council owned infrastructure fronting the development in Hobart is to be submitted to Penrith City Council.  The report is to include, but not limited to, footpaths, kerb and gutter, pavement and street trees and is to extend 10m either side of the development.

3.15.    Erosion and sediment control measures shall remain in place and be maintained until all disturbed areas have been rehabilitated and stabilised.

3.16.    Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall ensure that all works within the road reserve have been inspected and approved by Penrith City Council.

3.17.    After completion of all civil works, works-as-executed drawings and compliance documentation shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.

An original set of works-as-executed drawings and copies of compliance documentation shall also be submitted to Penrith City Council with notification of the issue of the Occupation / Subdivision Certificate where Council is not the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

3.18.    Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate the Principal Certifying Authority shall ensure that all civil works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the Construction Certificate, Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works, and relevant conditions of the development consent.

3.19.    Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate the Certifying Authority shall ensure that the on-site detention system:

o     Has been constructed in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works and Construction Certificate conditions of development consent.

o     Will operate satisfactorily with regard to any variations or that suitable remedial works have been undertaken.

o     Will operate in accordance with the design intent and Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.

Details of the approved and constructed system/s shall be provided as part of the works-as-executed drawings.

 

3.20.    Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate a restriction as to user and positive covenant relating to the on-site detention system shall be registered on the title of the property.  The restriction as to user and positive covenant shall be in Penrith City Council’s standard wording as detailed in Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.

3.21.    Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate any damage to Council infrastructure not identified in the dilapidation report, as a result of the development shall be restored under the supervision of Penrith City Council.  Any rectification works within Hobart Street will require a Roads Act application.  The application is to be submitted and approved by Penrith City Council prior to such works commencing.

3.22.    Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate street trees are to be planted at a rate of 2 per lot in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Development Control Plan.

Prior to planting of street trees, the plant species and location are to be approved by Penrith City Council.  In this regard, please contact Council’s Development Services Unit on 4732 7777.

 

3.23.    Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate a checklist and supporting documentation shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority demonstrating that each condition of the development consent has been satisfactorily addressed.

The Occupation Certificate shall not be issued until all conditions of consent except those relating to ongoing operational matters, have been completed.

 

4.         Those making submissions notified of the determination.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

Locality Map

1 Page

Appendix

2. View

Site Plan

1 Page

Appendix

3. View

Elevation Plan

1 Page

Appendix

  


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 1 - Locality Map

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 2 - Site Plan

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 3 - Elevation Plan

 

 

 

 


A Green City

 

Item                                                                                                                                       Page

 

6        Western Sydney Regional Illegal Dumping (RID) Squad

 

 



Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Green City

 

 

 

6

Western Sydney Regional Illegal Dumping (RID) Squad   

 

Compiled by:                Laurie Cafarella, Acting Waste and Community Protection Manager

Authorised by:             David Burns, Group Manager - City Presentation   

 

Objective

We use our resources wisely, and take responsibility for our levels of consumption

Community Outcome

A Council with a smaller ecological footprint (13)

Strategic Response

Work to reduce the organisation's ecological footprint (13.1)

       

 

Executive Summary

This report will provide Council with advice on the current status of the Western Sydney Regional Illegal Dumping (RID) Squad and recommend that the General Manager be authorised to sign an amended Western Sydney Regional Illegal Dumping (RID) Squad Alliance Agreement that includes Parramatta City Council, and the General Manager be authorised to approve of the delegations being made by Parramatta City Council to any Penrith City Council employee appointed as a RID Squad officer.

Background

The Western Sydney RID Squad was formed in 1999, as a response to the growing problem of the illegal dumping of waste.  The RID Squad is a partnership between the State Government and local councils aimed at addressing the illegal dumping of waste material throughout Western Sydney.  Current members of the Strategic Alliance include Bankstown, Baulkham Hills, Fairfield, Holroyd, Liverpool and Penrith Councils and the Department of Environment Climate Change & Water (DECCW). 

 

Penrith City Council has hosted the RID Squad since its conception and in 2002 Council took over management of the project.  A formal agreement with the project partners was developed to project manage the Squad.  The current agreement is due to conclude on 30 June 2012, with an option to continue for a further three years to 2015.

 

Each participating council has agreed to participate in the RID Squad pursuant to Section 355 of the Local Government Act 1993 and enter into the Strategic Alliance to carry out the project.  Council is currently a signatory to the Strategic Alliance Agreement.

 

The current Agreement identifies each party’s responsibility in regard to co-operation, delegation of authority, role of the Management Committee, role of the Project Manager and employment of staff.  The Agreement also provides for an exit strategy on conclusion of the project. 

 

Each participating Council has also delegated the authority to employees of the RID Squad, employed by Penrith City Council, the necessary rights, powers and authorities that the RID Squad staff require to undertake their work within the respective Council area.

Current Situation

Earlier this year the RID Squad Management Committee was approached by Parramatta City Council for information on the Strategic Alliance and the type of regulatory service that could be provided for Parramatta. Following on from those negotiations, the Management Committee resolved to extend an offer to Parramatta City Council to become an Alliance member.

 

Parramatta City Council formally accepted the offer made by the Management Committee and at the RID Squad Management Committee Meeting of 19 August 2010, the representative from Parramatta City Council was provided with a revised Strategic Alliance Agreement to complete and forward to the other Alliance member councils for signature.

 

Delegations of Authority

In addition to delegating RID Squad officers the powers to carry out the functions of their positions, as the employing Council we must have regard for Section 381 of the Local Government Act 1993. This requires that powers delegated to a Council Officer by other councils must also be approved by the employing council. Under Section 381, Penrith City Council and the General Manager must approve the delegations to RID Squad officers given by Alliance member councils.

 

The Strategic Alliance Agreement was amended to ensure that the delegations issued given to RID Squad officers could be consistently applied throughout the alliance members’ local government areas. Each of the alliance councils now provide Penrith City Council with a standard delegation of authority to enable the RID Squad officers to perform the duties of their positions within each alliance member council local government area. This delegation has been provided in the past to council by existing alliance members and approved by the General Manager under delegation from Council.

 

Parramatta City Council is now required to provide the same delegation of authority to any Penrith City Council employee appointed as a RID Squad Officer for approval by the Council and the General Manager pursuant to sec 381 of the Local Government Act 1993. The delegations are:

 

a.       Powers of an ‘authorised officer’ under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997

b.       Powers of entry, inspection and application for search warrants under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Regulations

c.       Powers of an ‘authorised officer’ under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Regulations

d.       Powers of entry and inspection under the Local Government Act 1993 and Regulations.

 

Conclusion

Based on Council’s experience to date as Project Manager of the RID Squad, it has proven to be a worthwhile project that has achieved some outstanding results both for the Alliance member councils and Penrith City Council and has had an impact on illegal dumping that more than justifies the financial contribution made by each Alliance member to the project.

Consequently, this report recommends that the General Manager be authorised to sign an amended Western Sydney Regional Illegal Dumping (RID) Squad Alliance Agreement that includes Parramatta City Council, and the General Manager be authorised to approve of the delegations being made by Parramatta City Council to any Penrith City Council employee appointed as a RID Squad officer.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.    The information contained in the report on Western Sydney Regional Illegal Dumping (RID) Squad be received.

2.     The General Manager be authorised to sign an amended Western Sydney Regional Illegal Dumping (RID) Squad Alliance Agreement that includes Parramatta City Council.

3.     In accordance with s.381 of the Local Government Act 1993, the General Manager be authorised to approve of the following delegations being made by Parramatta City Council to any Penrith City Council employee appointed as a RID Squad officer:

a.   Powers of an ‘authorised officer’ under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.

b.   Powers of entry, inspection and application for search warrants under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Regulations.

c.   Powers of an ‘authorised officer’ under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Regulations.

d.   Powers of entry and inspection under the Local Government Act 1993 and Regulations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.  


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


A Liveable City

 

Item                                                                                                                                       Page

 

7        NSW Bike Plan 2010 - Funding Offer from Roads and Traffic Authority

 

8        Local Government Road Safety Program - Roads and Traffic Authority Grant Funding 2010-2011

 

9        Tender Reference 05-10/11 for the provision of Graffiti Removal Services

 

10      The Driftway, Londonderry - Memorandum of Understanding with Hawkesbury City Council

 

 



Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Liveable City

 

 

 

7

NSW Bike Plan 2010 - Funding Offer from Roads and Traffic Authority   

 

Compiled by:                Ruth Byrnes, Senior Traffic Officer

Authorised by:             Adam Wilkinson, Engineering Services Manager   

 

Objective

Our physical infrastructure is adaptable, and responds to changing needs

Community Outcome

A City with an integrated local road and pathways network (16)

Strategic Response

Improve the City’s footpath and cycleway network (16.3)

        

 

Executive Summary

The NSW Bike Plan 2010 was released on 16 May 2010.  By letter dated 10 June 2010, the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) confirmed that an allocation of up to $1,000,000 has been approved for 2010-2011 for Council to design and construct an off-road shared use path on Great Western Highway from Worth Street to Memorial Avenue, Penrith.  This report recommends that the funding offer be accepted subject to conditions.

Background

On 16 May 2010, Premier Keneally MP released the NSW Bike Plan 2010, prepared by the Premier’s Council for Active Living, the RTA, and the Department of Environment Climate Change and Water.

 

The NSW Bike Plan is a key element of the Metropolitan Transport Plan, which sets out a ten-year $158,000,000 funding program of bicycle infrastructure projects across Sydney.

 

The NSW Bike Plan aims to support safe, healthy and sustainable cycling, and will guide growth in bike riding in NSW over the next decade or more.  The Plan details a ten-year strategy for funding bicycle infrastructure across NSW, including:

 

·          cross-regional missing links in the Metro Sydney Bike Network ($80 million);

·          subregional bike networks in the Western Sydney River Cities of Parramatta, Liverpool and Penrith ($78 million).

 

In addition, the RTA will continue to provide assistance for local councils across NSW to improve local cycleway networks ($5 million every year).

 

The Plan also includes a range of social programs and policy initiatives designed to promote active transport, particularly for short local trips in NSW cities, towns and neighbourhoods.  Some of the actions programmed include:

 

·          Increase dollar-for-dollar assistance to fund local council bike plan actions;

·          Review and promote good practice designs for the construction, linemarking and signage of safe shared pedestrian and cycle paths, and investigate options to convert existing footpath sections to shared use where safe;

·          Provide cycle racks with CCTV surveillance at all city rail stations, ferry wharves and major bus interchanges and bike storage cages at new commuter car parks;

·          Give people the information they need to ride further and more often, like an online bike route-finding facility;

·          To support people to cycle with confidence, fast-track the roll out of adult cycle skills training in the Western Sydney River Cities of Parramatta, Liverpool and Penrith;

·          Actively promote bike-riding as an easy, everyday exercise and transport choice.

 

As part of the above incentives, adult cycle skills training has commenced in Penrith, with the first of seven sessions conducted on 8 August, 2010 for Penrith City Council staff and community members.  In addition, the “Bike Racks as Art” project was launched by The Hon David Borger MP, Minister for Roads and Minister for Western Sydney at the Powerhouse Museum on 12 August 2010.  This part of the NSW Bike Plan 2010 invites designers and artists to enter a design for bicycle racks for construction by the RTA.  A number of potential sites through Parramatta, Liverpool and Penrith have been nominated, at which the winning design of the competition may be constructed.

 

Funding Offer

As an initiative of the River Cities Bike Program within the NSW Bike Plan 2010, the RTA, by letter dated 10 June 2010, has confirmed that an allocation of up to $1,000,000 has been approved for 2010-2011 (Year 1) for Council to design and construct an off-road shared use path.

 

The shared use path is proposed in Penrith on the northern side of High Street from Worth Street to Mulgoa Road, then on the southern side of Great Western Highway from Mulgoa Road to Memorial Avenue, then on the northern side Memorial Avenue to the entrance of the Great River Walk, adjacent to the Log Cabin Motel.

 

The funding is offered on the provision that Council will design, construct, own and maintain the shared use path.  The path is to be completed by the end of June 2011.

 

The RTA has also advised that it is the intention of the NSW Government that River Cities Bike Program initiatives be jointly funded by the Government and Council under a 75%/25% funding split, when total expenditure by both parties is accounted for over the ten-year life of the program.  On this basis, and not withstanding the commitment of funding for 2010-11, the RTA will develop in consultation with Council a draft Memorandum of Understanding or other agreement for execution by both parties and covers the joint funding, delivery and ownership of River Cities Bike Projects over the period from 2010 to 2020 inclusive, in terms consistent with the NSW Bike Plan commitments.

 

Given the timing of the announcement of the funding offer and the status of Council’s budget, Council officers wrote to the RTA advising that we are unable to contribute financially to this current Year 1 project, however we could offer in-kind support through design and project management.  We advised the RTA that our acceptance of Year 1 funding was conditional on:

 

1.     our contribution in Year 1 is limited to in-kind support through design and project management

2.     acceptance of funding is for Year 1 only and any future funding and associated agreements are separate and discrete from Year 1 funding, and

3.     acceptance of Year 1 does not bind Council to acceptance of future funding/program agreements.

 

The RTA were satisfied with this position and advised that “as we discussed, Council’s likely position seems to me a good basis for further conversations about how and when both parties will contribute to the realisation of a ten-year program, leading to a detailed agreement.  In the first instance we should of course jointly focus on the delivery of high-priority projects in this financial year, funded by the RTA”.

 

Current Position

Council’s budgets for 2010-2011 have been adopted and as such, Council does not have the discretionary funds (25%) to allocate to the Year 1 project.  Council is, however, able to offer in-kind support for Year 1 in the form of project management (design and construction) associated with the expenditure of the $1,000,000.

 

It is therefore proposed that Council seek conditional acceptance of the funding offer of $1,000,000 from the RTA subject to:

 

a)   Council’s contribution in the Year 1 (2010-11) project is limited to in-kind support through project management (design and construction);

b)   Council’s acceptance of funding is for Year 1 only and any future funding associated agreements are separate and discrete from Year 1 funding; and

c)   Council’s acceptance of the Year 1 project does not bind Council to acceptance of future funding/program agreements.

 

Finance Comment

The design and project management can be provided internally by the Major Projects and Engineering Services Departments using the existing 10/11 budget allocation.

 

Conclusion

Given Council’s current and long-term financial commitments and planning, this is the best possible outcome at this time to allow the NSW Bike Plan 2010 to proceed in Penrith.  Council will be advised of negotiations with the RTA regarding funding arrangements in the future years of the Plan and any Memorandum of Understanding or other agreement that may be developed.

 

The $1,000,000 funding offer for the commencement of the NSW Bike Plan 2010 is welcomed, and it is hoped that a comprehensive cycleway network across the City can be developed over the ten-year program.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on NSW Bike Plan 2010 - Funding Offer from Roads and Traffic Authority be received.

2.     Council accept the funding offer of $1 million from the Roads and Traffic Authority for the NSW Bike Plan 2010, subject to the following conditions:

a)        Council’s contribution in the Year 1 (2010-11) project is limited to in-kind support through project management (design and construction);

b)        Council’s acceptance of funding is for Year 1 only and any future funding associated agreements are separate and discrete from Year 1 funding; and

c)        Council’s acceptance of the Year 1 project does not bind Council to acceptance of future funding/program agreements.

 

                    3.     Council write to the Minister for Roads and the Local Members expressing appreciation of the funding offer.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Liveable City

 

 

 

8

Local Government Road Safety Program - Roads and Traffic Authority Grant Funding 2010-2011   

 

Compiled by:                Daniel Davidson, Road Safety Co-ordinator

Authorised by:             Adam Wilkinson, Engineering Services Manager   

 

Objective

Our physical infrastructure is adaptable, and responds to changing needs

Community Outcome

A City with an integrated local road and pathways network (16)

Strategic Response

Implement effective traffic and parking responses (16.2)

       

 

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise Council of the grants offered by the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) under the Local Government Road Safety Program (LGRSP).  The report recommends that Council accept the grants as outlined in the report.

Background

The goal of the RTA’s LGRSP is to reduce the incidence and severity of crashes through the increased involvement of local government.

 

Programs targeting behavioural road safety issues are developed from local priorities identified from crash data analysis by Council's Road Safety Co-ordinator, of which some are funded through the LGRSP.  The amount of project funding available from the RTA’s LGRSP is limited to a maximum of $10,000 with many projects restricted to supporting existing RTA programs.

 

An additional $1,500 of RTA funding is made available for the purpose of running Graduated Licensing Scheme Workshops for parents and/or supervisors of learner drivers.

 

Funding submissions for 2010-2011 have been prepared and were submitted to the RTA for consideration with all applications successful in gaining funding as outlined in this report.

 

Current Situation

The programs being developed for 2010-2011 with grant funding from the RTA are as follows:

 

Key Area - Speed Related Crashes

Local speeding enforcement operations by NSW Police will be supported with courtesy speed checks and local media advertising.  Grant funding will be allocated for local media advertisements and printed materials.   Funding from the RTA $2,000.00.

 

Key Area - Drink Drive Related Crashes

A drink driving program supporting enforcement will again be operating within licensed premises.  Funding will be used to promote in-venue materials such as pull up blinds, posters and coasters.    Funding from the RTA $5,000.

 

Key Area - Vulnerable Road Users

Child Restraint Checking Days will again be conducted on two occasions during 2010-2011.  The aim of the checking day is to promote the correct use and installation of child restraints.  Inspections will be carried out by an authorised fitter in order to identify and adjust any unsafe fittings.  Inspections are a free service to attendees of the checking day and the grant funding is allocated to promotion of the program through local media and printed materials. Funding from the RTA $3,000.

 

Key Area - Young Drivers

Graduated Licensing Scheme Workshops will again be conducted on three occasions during 2010-2011 for parents/supervisors of learner drivers.  The Workshops offer practical advice on supervising learner drivers, completing the Learner Driver Log Book and the benefits of driving practice.  Funding for these workshops is derived from the RTA’s NSW Centre for Road Safety, Safer People Directorate.  Workshops are promoted through local newspapers, Council’s website and correspondence to all local high schools.  Funding from the RTA $1,500.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Local Government Road Safety Program - Roads and Traffic Authority Grant Funding 2010-2011 be received.

2.     Council accept the three grants offered by the Roads and Traffic Authority Local Government Road Safety Program, totalling $10,000.00, as outlined in the report.

3.     Council accept the grant offered by the Roads and Traffic Authority NSW Centre for Road Safety for Graduated Licensing Scheme Workshops, totalling $1,500.00 as outlined in the report.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Liveable City

 

 

 

9

Tender Reference 05-10/11 for the provision of Graffiti Removal Services   

 

Compiled by:                Ben Rodwell, Supply Officer Contracts

Yvonne Perkins, Public Domain Amenity and Safety Manager

Authorised by:             Yvonne Perkins, Public Domain Amenity and Safety Manager   

 

Objective

Our public spaces encourage safe and healthy communities

Community Outcome

A City with safe, inviting parks and public spaces (18)

Strategic Response

Provide safe, well-maintained public spaces and parks (18.1)

       

 

Executive Summary

A new tender for the provision of graffiti removal services, from private property accessible from public space for a period of one year, with an option to extend for a further one year period, allowing for rise and fall provisions, was advertised on 22 June 2010 and closed on 15 July 2010.

 

The report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process and recommends that the tender from NT Barnes Pty Ltd (trading as Wundaguard) be accepted for Graffiti Removal Services for a period of one (1) year with an option to extend for a further one (1) year period, allowing for rise and fall provisions.

Background

Tenders were advertised in the Sydney Morning Herald, Penrith Press and the e-Tendering website on 22 June 2010 for the provision of Graffiti Removal Services for a period of one (1) year with an option to extend for a further one (1) year period and closed on 15 July 2010.

 

It was proposed in the tender documents that Council would select one primary contractor and two secondary contractors to perform all of the specified services.  The secondary contractors would only be engaged in the event that the primary contractor failed in its obligations. 

 

The tender requires the delivery of services comprising painting out of graffiti and graffiti removal, along with detailed reporting and provision of before and after photographs of the affected areas. 

 

Tenderers were required to submit their tender on a standard pro-forma sheet, which clearly identified the required response against each of the evaluation criteria. Tenderers were also required to complete a price schedule setting out the unit rates per square metre for graffiti removal and graffiti paint out.

Tender Evaluation Committee

The Tender Evaluation Panel consisted of David Burns (Group Manager – City Presentation), Yvonne Perkins (Public Domain & Safety Manager), Murray Halls (Public Domain Coordinator), Olivia Kidon (Community Safety Coordinator) & Ben Rodwell (Acting Supply Coordinator).

 

Tender Evaluation Criteria

The selection criteria advertised and used in selecting the successful tenderers were:

 

Proven Ability & Experience

·    Demonstrated ability in meeting the supply of services required

·    Compliance to specified requirements

·    Response times

·    Conformance to standards

 

Cost/Price Category

·    The rates and unit prices for the services specified

·    Rise and fall provisions

 

Management and Administration

·    Financial capacity

·    Office support systems

·    Environmental Management System

·    Industrial relations

·    Occupational Health & Safety and Public Liability Management

·    Quality Control

 

Summary of Tenders Received

A total of 12 submissions were received from the following respondents (listed in alphabetical order) in response the advertised tender.

 

·    Australian High Pressure Cleaning Pty Ltd

·    Complete Plant Hire Pty Ltd

·    Grey Army NSW Pty Ltd

·    Metric Group Limited

·    NT Barnes Pty Ltd (trading as Wundaguard)

·    Penrith Skills for Jobs Limited

·    Redirender Solutions

·    RMA Construction Group Pty Ltd

·    Tech-Knowledge Service Pty Ltd

·    Wise Group FM Pty Ltd

·    Workzone Pty Ltd

·    Envirochoice Industries Pty Ltd

 

All companies intending to submit a response were required to attend a mandatory pre-tender briefing on 24 June 2010. The briefing included a review of the documents and provided an opportunity for prospective tenderers to seek any necessary clarification of the specified requirements.

 

The tender documentation clearly identified that all companies intending to submit a response were required to attend a pre tender briefing.  The documentation also clearly stated that the implication of non-attendance at the pre tender briefing are that the tenderers response would be deemed to be non-complying and as such may not be considered in the evaluation process. 

 

Redirender Solutions and Tech-Knowledge Services Pty Ltd did not attend the pre-tender briefing and a review of their prices by the evaluation committee showed that they were not competitive and were subsequently excluded from the evaluation.

 

Criteria Evaluation

Following the evaluation of the remaining ten (10) tenders the tender evaluation committee determined that all ten (10) tenderers demonstrated compliance with each of the evaluation criteria.  

 

Price Evaluation

Prices were requested for removal of graffiti – painting out and removal of graffiti – cleaning.  Tenderers were requested to provide unit rates for work performed during normal hours with no minimum charges or set up costs.

 

The table below ranks from lowest to highest the unit rates for each type of removal.  To enable a full comparison and impact of the unit rates submitted, a total annualised cost for each tenderer has been calculated based on the actual areas for painting out and cleaning that was achieved for graffiti removal in 2009-2010.

 

In 2009-2010 there was a total of 31,741 square metres of graffiti removal (paint out) and 6,482 square metres graffiti removal (cleaning) from private property accessible from the public space.

 

 

 

Tendering Entity

Unit Prices

Annualised Cost

Overall Total

Remove

Paint out

Remove

Paint out

Annualised

Complete Plant Hire Pty Ltd

 

3.00

2.50

19,446.00

       79,352.00

98,798.00

NT Barnes Pty Ltd (trading as Wundaguard)

 

8.00

4.00

51,856.00

      126,964.00

178,820.00

Workzone Pty Ltd

 

8.00

8.00

51,856.00

      253,928.00

305,784.00

 

Envirochoice Industries Pty Ltd

8.50

8.00

55,097.00

      253,928.00

        309,025.00

 

Metric Group Limited

9.79

11.56

63,458.78

      366,925.96

        430,384.74


 

 

Australian High Pressure Cleaning Pty Ltd

18.00

10.00

116,676.00

317,410.00

434,086.00

 

Penrith Skills for Jobs Ltd

25.00

25.00

162,050.00

793,525.00

955,575.00

 

Grey Army NSW Pty Ltd

29.00

26.00

187,978.00

      825,266.00

1,013,244.00

 

Wise Group FM Pty Ltd

 

25.00

28.00

162,050.00

888,748.00

1,050,798.00

 

RMA Construction Group Pty Ltd

35.00

30.00

226,870.00

952,230.00

 1,179,100.00

 

Based on the compliance and cost rankings, the following tenders were shortlisted for further analysis including “Financial Health Checks and Referee Checks”. 

 

·    Complete Plant Hire Pty Ltd

·    NT Barnes Pty Ltd  (trading as Wundaguard)

·    Workzone Pty Ltd

·    Envirochoice Industries Pty Ltd

 

Based on the prices submitted there was no clear advantage to Council further considering any of the remaining tenders.

 

Complete Plant Hire Pty Ltd

The independent Financial & Performance Assessment conducted by Corporate Scorecard provided the following information.  Complete Plant Hire Pty Ltd is based in Prestons, NSW and are a recently established entity having been incorporated in June 2008.  The company operates as a soda blasting contractor supplying a full cleaning, restoration and after care service including pavement and surface water proofing and sealing.  The company incorporates various specialist departments which include car, motorbike (vintage and racing) trailers; marine and aircraft; heritage restoration; residential and graffiti and council asset solutions.  

 

Concerns were raised in the assessment as to its operating capacity to deliver a contract of this size as it would represent 85% of its largest revenue achieved since incorporation.  It is also considered that the rates quoted are far too low and are not sustainable over a possible two (2) year contract.  Additionally the company has very limited experience in graffiti removal. Given these reasons Complete Plant Hire Pty Ltd were excluded from further evaluation.

 

NT Barnes Pty Ltd (trading as Wundaguard)

The independent Financial & Performance Assessment conducted by Corporate Scorecard provided the following information.  NT Barnes Pty Ltd (trading as Wundaguard) is based in Smeaton Grange. The company was incorporated in 1990 with the operations of Wundaguard being acquired in 2001.  The company operates as a specialist cleaning business that predominately provides graffiti removal and high pressure cleaning services to state and local government authorities, industrial, commercial and private clients.

 

They have previously been engaged as Penrith City Council’s preferred graffiti removal contractor for two (2) separate contracts.  The services provided during this period have been more than satisfactory and they meet all specified requirements.

 

The third party financial analysis check found that there were no adverse findings and demonstrated satisfactory financial capacity to undertake the works.  Third party referee reports indicated a good to superior level of performance and customer satisfaction. 

 

Workzone Pty Ltd

The independent Financial & Performance Assessment conducted by Corporate Scorecard provided the following information.  The company was incorporated in 1995.  The company has been a preferred service provider to utilities and councils since 1996 and has conducted numerous successful facilities maintenance programs, including graffiti removal.  In the last few years, the company has carried out maintenance management programs for RailCorp, Department of Public Works and numerous local authorities and state government authorities.  The company has extensive experience in maintenance management programs.  The company is based in Blacktown.

 

The third party financial analysis check found that there were no adverse findings and demonstrated satisfactory financial capacity to undertake the works.  Third party referee reports indicated a good to superior level of performance and customer satisfaction

 

Envirochoice Industries Pty Ltd

The independent Financial & Performance Assessment conducted by Corporate Scorecard provided the following information. The company was incorporated in 2007. The company operates as a cleaning contractor and services include: roofs, buildings, pathway restoration and graffiti removal and prevention.  The company has carried out graffiti removal service and the application of anti graffiti shields to 511 buildings over eight (8) campuses for the University of Western Sydney and graffiti removal for the Department of Housing NSW. The third party financial analysis check found that there were no adverse findings and demonstrated satisfactory financial capacity to undertake the works. The company is based in Ingleburn.

 

The third party financial analysis check found that there were no adverse findings and demonstrated satisfactory financial capacity to undertake the works. Third party referee reports indicated a good to superior level of performance and customer satisfaction

 

Conclusion

NT Barnes Pty Ltd (trading as Wundaguard), Workzone Pty Ltd and Envirochoice Industries Pty Ltd have demonstrated their capability in providing the specified services and have a wide range of experience in carrying out the services.

 

NT Barnes Pty Ltd (trading as Wundaguard) has submitted the best value rates and has the necessary experience to carry out the required graffiti removal service and is recommended as the preferred supplier for graffiti removal and paint out.

 

As previously advised, two (2) secondary contractors were to be selected for graffiti removal service and engaged in the event that the primary contractor failed in its obligations. However, due to the large price difference between NT Barnes Pty Ltd (trading as Wundaguard) and Workzone Pty Ltd and Envirochoice Industries Pty Ltd, as shown in the above table, it is recommended that no secondary contractors be appointed.

 

Tender Advisory Group comments

The Tender Advisory Group (TAG) is comprised of Stephen Britten (Group Manager, Legal and Governance) and Matthew Bullivant (Legal Officer). The TAG was established as part of the tender evaluation plan to review the conduct of the evaluation for compliance with Council’s tender procedure.

 

The TAG notes that the Tender Evaluation Panel concluded that Complete Plant Hire Pty Ltd has limited experience in graffiti removal. The capacity of Complete Plant Hire Pty Ltd to undertake the work seems to be questionable. The matter of that company’s capacity to undertake the work is a matter for the Tender Evaluation Panel.

 

It is the opinion of the TAG that the established tender procedures were adhered to and that the Tender Evaluation Panel had regard to and has complied with the tendering provisions of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 05-10/11 for the provision of Graffiti Removal Services be received.

2.     The tender from NT Barnes Pty Ltd (trading as Wundaguard) be accepted for Graffiti Paint Out and Removal Services for a period of one (1) year with an option to extend for a further one (1) year period, allowing for rise and fall provisions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Liveable City

 

 

 

10

The Driftway, Londonderry - Memorandum of Understanding with Hawkesbury City Council   

 

Compiled by:                Hans Meijer, City Works Manager

Authorised by:             Hans Meijer, City Works Manager   

 

Objective

Our physical infrastructure is adaptable, and responds to changing needs

Community Outcome

A City with an integrated local road and pathways network (16)

Strategic Response

Provide a safe, efficient local road network (16.1)

       

 

 

Executive Summary

Council has received representations from residents of The Driftway, Londonderry for Penrith City Council to contribute to its ongoing maintenance. The purpose of this report is to recommend that a Memorandum of Understanding between Penrith City Council and Hawkesbury City Council be entered into, to enable the costs involved with the ongoing maintenance of The Driftway to be shared equally between both Councils.

 

The draft Memorandum of Understanding was included in Hawkesbury City Council’s Ordinary Business on 31 August 2010 where it was resolved in part that:

 

‘1. The Memorandum of Understanding between Penrith City Council and Hawkesbury City Council for the maintenance of The Driftway be approved and executed.’

Background

The current gazetted Council boundary between Penrith City Council and Hawkesbury City Council follows the northern property boundaries of residences along the Driftway residing in the Penrith LGA between Bonner Road and Reynolds Road, Londonderry. This has meant that the entire road reserve, accessed by Penrith residents, is located within the Hawkesbury LGA. Approaches have been made by residents along The Driftway for Penrith City Council to assist in maintaining The Driftway as these residents contribute their rates to Penrith City Council. The majority of land on the northern side of The Driftway is owned by the University of Western Sydney, for which Hawkesbury City Council does not receive any rates.

 

The Driftway is a local road and therefore any funding required for its maintenance is met by the Council in which it is located. Although the entire width of the road is within the Hawkesbury LGA, it is still under the Local Government Act, classified as a boundary road. This is an unusual situation, as the boundary between Local Government areas is normally the centre line of the boundary road.

 

The Local Government Act stipulates that where one side of the road lies in one area and the other side of the road lies in the other area, or where the middle line forms a common boundary, the Councils are required to unite together to carry out work on the road and if they fail to reach agreement, they are in dispute and the dispute has to be dealt with by the Minister for Local Government.

 

All other road boundaries with adjoining LGAs are along State roads, where the Roads and Traffic Authority is responsible for any road pavement works. Whilst Penrith City Council has not previously contributed to routine maintenance along The Driftway, there is an expectation from residents that Council should contribute to its ongoing maintenance.

 

Penrith City Council has previously contributed funds to Hawkesbury City Council for the upgrading and sealing of The Driftway between 1992 and 1995. At this time, funding totalling $915,375, was invested for the upgrading and sealing of the Driftway. A special RTA grant contributed 50% of this funding, with Penrith City Council contributing 25% and Hawkesbury City Council contributing 25%. Since this time, Penrith City Council has not contributed towards any major works along The Driftway.

 

Proposal

The proposal is for a Memorandum of Understanding to be signed by Penrith City Council and Hawkesbury City Council that agrees to shared maintenance of The Driftway. The proposed Memorandum of Understanding is similar to one already in place between Hawkesbury City Council and The Hills Shire Council for Boundary Road, Box Hill.

 

The Memorandum of Understanding limits ‘minor’ works along The Driftway to $60,000 (in any one financial year), with each Council performing all routine pavement works in alternate financial years for full width and invoicing the other at the end of financial year for half of the actual costs expended for that financial year. Under the Memorandum of Understanding, Penrith City Council will maintain the southern footway and road shoulder, while Hawkesbury City Council would maintain the northern footway and road shoulder. Any proposed major works will require prior agreement for inclusion in a future works program.

 

The agreement offers the potential for additional works to be carried out resulting in improved road safety for both residents and the general public.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on The Driftway, Londonderry - Memorandum of Understanding with Hawkesbury City Council be received

2.     The Memorandum of Understanding between Penrith City Council and Hawkesbury City Council for the maintenance of The Driftway be executed by the City Works Manager.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

Proposed Memorandum of Understanding between Penrith City Council and Hawkebury City Council for the maintenance of The Driftway, Londonderry

3 Pages

Appendix

  


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

Appendix 1 - Proposed Memorandum of Understanding between Penrith City Council and Hawkebury City Council for the maintenance of The Driftway, Londonderry

 

 

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

 

This memorandum of understanding made the                        day of                    2010

 

BETWEEN: PENRITH CITY COUNCIL of 601 High Street Penrith in the State of New South Wales (“Council”)      

 

AND:           HAWKESBURY CITY COUNCIL of 366 George Street Windsor in the State of New South Wales (“Council”)    

 

1. BACKGROUND

 

1.1       Both Penrith City Council and Hawkesbury City Council recognise that the gazetted Council boundary along The Driftway (between Bonner Road and Reynolds Road) is the northern property boundary of properties within the Penrith Local Government Area.

 

1.2       The Driftway benefits both the residents of Penrith City Council and Hawkesbury City Council       

 

2. INTERPRETATION

 

Unless the contrary intention appears:

 

2.1       monetary references are to Australian currency;

 

2.2       the clause and sub-clause headings are for convenient reference only and have no effect in limiting or extending the language of the provisions to which they refer;

 

2.3       a cross reference to a clause number is a reference to all its sub-clauses;

 

2.4       words in the singular number include the plural and vice versa;

 

2.5       words importing one gender include the other;

 

2.6       a reference to a person includes a partnership and a body whether corporate or otherwise;

2.7       a reference to any legislation or legislative provision includes any statutory modification, re-enactment, regulation or statutory instrument issued under that legislation;

2.8       A reference to a clause or sub-clause is a reference to a clause or sub-clause of this Contract; and

2.9       Where a word or phrase is given a particular meaning, other parts of speech and grammatical forms of that word or phrase have corresponding meanings.

 

2.10     Minor Works comprise any road works up to a total value of $60,000.00 +- 10% per annum.

 

2.11     Major Works comprise any road works exceeding $66,000.00 per annum.

 

2.12     The amount applicable to minor/major works can be varied by agreement between member Councils.

 

3. OPERATIVE PART

 

3.1       The MOU refers specifically to the section of The Driftway, Londonderry between Bonner Road and Reynolds Road (herein called The Driftway)

 

3.2       Maintenance of the road by Penrith City Council shall consist of:

 

i. Footway and drainage (verge area) along the southern side of The Driftway

 

3.3       Maintenance of the road by Hawkesbury City Council shall consist of:

 

i.          Footway and drainage (verge area) along the northern side of The Driftway

 

3.4.1    Road rehabilitation / resurfacing / pothole works.

           

A.  Minor Works :

i. The annual maintenance of the sealed road surface on The Driftway and associated road shoulder area is performed by one of the member Councils on an alternating yearly roster.

ii. Annual costs for roadworks will be evenly shared between the two Councils

 

B. Major Works:

            i. Agreement will be reached by both Councils in December of the financial year preceding any proposed major roadworks along The Driftway for inclusion of those works in the following years Roads program

            ii. Costs for major works be evenly shared between the two Councils

 

3.5       Traffic facilities

 

            i. Consultation will occur between the two Councils prior to the implementation or modification of any traffic facilities/ restrictions along The Driftway

 

            ii. Costs for implementation and maintenance of the traffic facilities will be equally shared between the two Councils      

 

 

 

 

4. TERM

 

4.1       This memorandum of Understanding will remain effective for 10 years.

 

 

5. INDEMNITY

 

5.1       N/A

5.2       N/A

 

5. DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 

6.1       If any dispute arises out of the operation of this Memorandum of Understanding, the parties will make all possible efforts to resolve the dispute themselves, by agreement.

 

6.2 If the parties are unable to resolve a dispute themselves, then, in accordance with Council’s Negotiation and Consensus Policy, a conciliation or facilitation meeting may be held to try and identify and resolve the issues in dispute.

 

 

SIGNED

On behalf of Penrith City Council by its Authorised Officer

 

 

……………………….                  ……………………….

Authorised Officer                   

 

 

In the presence of

 

……………………….       ……………………….

Witness                                         

 

 

SIGNED

On behalf of Hawkesbury City Council by its Authorised Officer

 

……………………….       ………………………..

Authorised Officer

                                                     

 

In the presence of

……………………….       ………………………..

Witness


 

 

A Vibrant City

 

 

There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled



Committee of the Whole

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

CONTENTS

 

Pecuniary Interests

 

Other Interests

 

Monday September 6 2010

 

Item                                                                                                                                       Page

 

1        Presence of the Public                                                                                                          1

 

2        Commercial Matter - Council Property - Cranebrook Village Shopping Centre

 

 


Ordinary Meeting

6 September 2010

A Leading City

 

 

 

 

1        Presence of the Public

 

Everyone is entitled to attend a meeting of the Council and those of its Committees of which all members are Councillors, except as provided by Section 10 of the Local Government Act, 1993.

A Council, or a Committee of the Council of which all the members are Councillors, may close to the public so much of its meeting as comprises:

 

(a)                the discussion of any of the matters listed below; or

(b)               the receipt or discussion of any of the information so listed.

The matters and information are the following:

 

(a)                personnel matters concerning particular individuals;

(b)               the personal hardship of any resident or ratepayers;

(c)                information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business;

(d)               commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed:

·                         prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or

 

·                         confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or

 

·                         reveal a trade secret.

 

(e)                information that would, if disclosed, prejudice the maintenance of the law;

(f)                 matters affecting the security of the Council, Councillors, Council staff or Council property;

(g)        advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

The grounds on which part of a meeting is closed must be stated in the decision to close that part of the meeting and must be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.

The grounds must specify the following:

(a)                the relevant provision of section 10A(2);

(b)               the matter that is to be discussed during the closed part of the meeting;

(c)                the reasons why the part of the meeting is being closed, including (if the matter concerned is a matter other than a personnel matter concerning particular individuals, the personal hardship of a resident or ratepayer or a trade secret) an explanation of the way in which discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

Members of the public may make representations at a Council or Committee Meeting as to whether a part of a meeting should be closed to the public

The process which should be followed is:

 

·        a motion, based on the recommendation below, is moved and seconded

·        the Chairperson then asks if any member/s of the public would like to make representations as to whether a part of the meeting is closed to the public

·        if a member/s of the public wish to make representations, the Chairperson invites them to speak before the Committee makes its decision on whether to close the part of the meeting or not to the public.

·        if no member/s of the public wish to make representations the Chairperson can then put the motion to close the meeting to the public.

The first action is for a motion to be moved and seconded based on the recommendation below.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:

 

A Leading City

 

2        Commercial Matter - Council Property - Cranebrook Village Shopping Centre

This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

 


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY