15 February 2012

 

Dear Councillor,

In pursuance of the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 and the Regulations thereunder, notice is hereby given that an ORDINARY MEETING of Penrith City Council is to be held in the Council Chambers, Civic Centre, 601 High Street, Penrith on Monday 20 February 2012 at 7:30PM.

Attention is directed to the statement accompanying this notice of the business proposed to be transacted at the meeting.

Yours faithfully

 

 

Alan Stoneham

General Manager

 

BUSINESS

 

1.           LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Leave of absence has been granted to:

Councillor Jackie Greenow

2.           APOLOGIES

 

3.           CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

Ordinary Meeting - 6 February 2012.

 

4.           DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Pecuniary Interest (The Act requires Councillors who declare a pecuniary interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)

Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Significant and Less than Significant (The Code of Conduct requires Councillors who declare a significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)

 

5.           ADDRESSING COUNCIL

6.           MAYORAL MINUTES

7.           NOTICES OF MOTION TO RESCIND A RESOLUTION

8.           NOTICES OF MOTION AND QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

9.           ADOPTION OF REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEES

Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 6 February 2012.

Policy Review Committee Meeting - 13 February 2012.

10.         DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

11.         REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS

12.         URGENT BUSINESS

13.         COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE


ORDINARY MEETING

 

Monday 20 February 2012

 

table of contents

 

 

 

 

ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR

 

 

STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION OF PENRITH CITY’S ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CULTURAL HERITAGE

 

 

PRAYER

 

 

COUNCIL CHAMBER seating arrangements

 

 

meeting calendar

 

 

confirmation of minutes

 

 

PROCEDURE FOR ADDRESSING COUNCIL MEETING

 

 

MAYORAL MINUTES

 

 

report and recommendations of committees

 

 

DELIVERY program reports


 

ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR

 

 

 

Australians all let us rejoice,

For we are young and free;

We’ve golden soil and wealth for toil;

Our home is girt by sea;

Our land abounds in nature’s gifts

Of beauty rich and rare;

In history’s page, let every stage

Advance Australia Fair.

 

In joyful strains then let us sing,

Advance Australia Fair.

 

Beneath our radiant Southern Cross

We’ll toil with hearts and hands;

To make this Commonwealth of ours

Renowned of all the lands;

For those who’ve come across the seas

We’ve boundless plains to share;

With courage let us all combine

To Advance Australia Fair.

 

In joyful strains then let us sing,

Advance Australia Fair.

 



Statement of Recognition of Penrith City’s

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Cultural Heritage

 

 

Council values the unique status of Aboriginal people as the original owners and custodians of lands and waters, including the land and waters of Penrith City.

 

Council values the unique status of Torres Strait Islander people as the original owners and custodians of the Torres Strait Islands and surrounding waters.

 

We work together for a united Australia and City that respects this land of ours, that values the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage, and provides justice and equity for all.

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

PRAYER

 

 

 

“Sovereign God, tonight as we gather together as a Council we affirm that you are the giver and sustainer of life.  We come together as representatives of our community to make decisions that will benefit this city and the people within it. 

 

We come not in a spirit of competition, not as adversaries, but as colleagues.  Help us to treat each other with respect, with dignity, with interest and with honesty.  Help us not just to hear the words we say, but also to hear each others hearts.  We seek to be wise in all that we say and do.

 

As we meet, our concern is for this city.  Grant us wisdom, courage and strength.

 

Lord, help us.  We pray this in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord.  Amen.”

 

 

 

 

 


For members of the public addressing the meeting

 
Council Chambers

Text Box: Lectern

Group Managers                          

                
          

 
Seating Arrangements

 

 

 

Director
Craig Butler

 

 

Director
Barry Husking

 

 

 

General Manager
Alan Stoneham

His Worship the Mayor
Councillor
Greg Davies
East Ward

 

Senior Governance Officer
Glenn Schuil

 

 

Minute Clerk

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


                                                        

 

 

Text Box: Public Gallery
Text Box: Managers
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Group Managers                          

                
          

 
   


B&WHORIZ2012 MEETING CALENDAR

January 2012 - December 2012

(adopted by Council on 21 November 2011)

 

 

 

TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUG

SEPT

OCT

NOV

DEC

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

 

Ordinary Council Meeting

7.30pm

 

6

5

 

 

 

9

20#@

3ü

15∞

5

10

(7.00pm)

 

20#@

26

23v

21#

25*

23

 

24^\

(7.00pm)

 

19#

 

Policy Review Committee

7.00pm

 

 

 

 

7

4

2

13

 

 

 

3

 

13

19

16

 

 

30

 

 

8

12

 

Operational Plan Public Forum

 

6.00pm

 

 

 

 

Wed

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 v

Meeting at which the Draft Operational Plan for 2012-2013 is endorsed for exhibition

 *

Meeting at which the Operational Plan for 2012-2013 is adopted

 #

Meetings at which the Operational Plan quarterly reviews are presented

 @

Delivery Program progress reports

 ^

Election of Mayor/Deputy Mayor

 ü

Meeting at which the 2011-2012 Annual Statements are presented

 

Meeting at which any comments on the 2011-2012 Annual Statements are presented

\

The opportunity may be taken to move this meeting to the 17 September 2012, should the election result be declared early.

 

The Ordinary Council Election will be held on 8 September 2012

-            Extraordinary Meetings are held as required.

-            Members of the public are invited to observe meetings of the Council (Ordinary and Policy Review Committee).

Should you wish to address Council, please contact the Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil.


UNCONFIRMED MINUTES

 OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF PENRITH CITY COUNCIL HELD IN THE

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

ON MONDAY 6 FEBRUARY 2012 AT 7:40PM

NATIONAL ANTHEM 

The meeting opened with the National Anthem.

STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies read a statement of recognition of Penrith City’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage.

PRAYER

The Council Prayer was read by the Rev. Neil Checkley.

PRESENT

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies, Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jackie Greenow and Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, Robert Ardill, Kevin Crameri OAM, Mark Davies, Tanya Davies, Ross Fowler OAM, Ben Goldfinch, Prue Guillaume, Marko Malkoc, Karen McKeown, Kath Presdee and John Thain.

 

APOLOGIES

There were no apologies.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Ordinary Meeting - 12 December 2011

1  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Marko Malkoc that the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of 12 December 2011 be confirmed.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM declared a pecuniary interest in Item 9 State Government Review of Potential Housing Opportunities on Landowner Nominated Sites because he is a landowner and a Director of a Real Estate Company within the Penrith Local Government Area and therefore will leave the room during the consideration of the item and take no part in the consideration of the report.

 

SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS

2  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marko Malkoc seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow that Standing Orders be suspended to allow a member of the public to address the meeting, the time being 7.42pm.

 

Mr Geoff Brown

 

Item 9 – State Government Review of Potential Housing Opportunities on Landowner Nominated Sites.

 

Mr Brown, representing the Western Sydney Conservation Alliance, spoke in support of the recommendation and expressed concern regarding the ability for this plan to be implemented sustainably. Mr Brown spoke of the risk to the quality of life for current Penrith residents should the proposal proceed and a general concern for the environment. Mr Brown concluded by stating that it was concerning that the State Government was departing from the current Growth Centres Plan and that he believes Council should review all unsustainable developments within the area and have a moratorium on growth.

 

RESUMPTION OF STANDING ORDERS

3  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Marko Malkoc that Standing Orders be resumed, the time being 7.49pm.

 

Mayoral Minutes

 

1        Local residents recognised in Australia Day Honours                                                    

4  RESOLVED on the MOTION of the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies seconded the Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jackie Greenow that the Mayoral Minute on Local residents recognised in Australia Day Honours be received.

 

2        2012 Australia Day celebrations                                                                                       

5  RESOLVED on the MOTION of the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies seconded the Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jackie Greenow that the Mayoral Minute on 2012 Australia Day celebrations be received.

 

Reports of Committees

 

1        Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee meeting held on 7 December 2011                                                                                                                                             

6  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Marko Malkoc that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee meeting held on 7 December, 2011 be adopted.

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

A Leading City

 

3        Summary of Investments and Banking for the period 1 December to 31 December 2011   

7  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marko Malkoc seconded Councillor Prue Guillaume

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Summary of Investments and Banking for the period 1 December to 31 December 2011 be received.

2.     The Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer and Summaries of Investments and Performance for the period 1 December 2011 to 31 December 2011 be noted and accepted.

3.     The graphical investment analysis as at 31 December 2011 be noted.

4.     The Agency Collection Methods as at 31 December 2011 be noted.

 

1        Housing the Bennett Wagons                                                                                            

8  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Marko Malkoc

That

1.             The information contained in the report on Housing the Bennett Wagons be   received.

2.             A further report be presented to a future Council meeting outlining potential funding options to provide suitable cover for Housing the Bennett Wagons.

 

2        Australian Local Government Women's Association 2012 NSW State Annual Conference

9  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Australian Local Government Women's Association 2012 NSW State Annual Conference be received.

2.     Council nominate Councillors Kaylene Allison, Prue Guillaume, Kath Presdee, Karen McKeown, Jackie Greenow and any other Councillor to attend ALGWA’s 59th Annual NSW State Conference, to be held in Dubbo from Thursday 22 to Saturday 24 March 2012.

 

9        State Government Review of Potential Housing Opportunities on Landowner Nominated Sites

Having previously declared a pecuniary interest in this item, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM left the room, the time being 8:06pm and took no part in the consideration of the item.                         

10  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Prue Guillaume seconded Councillor John Thain

That

1.             The information contained in the report on State Government Review of        Potential Housing Opportunities on Landowner Nominated Sites be                received.

2.             Council endorses the submission that has been submitted to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure.

 Councillor Jim Aitken OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 8:18pm.

 

A City of Opportunities

 

4        Request For Applications for the Commonwealth Inclusion and Professional Support Program                                                                                                                              

11  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marko Malkoc seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Request For Applications for the Commonwealth Inclusion and Professional Support Program be received.

2.     Council endorse an application under the Commonwealth Inclusion and Professional Support Program for the Sydney North West Inclusion Support Agency for the period 1 January 2013 to 30 June 2016.

3.     Council be advised of the outcome of the application.

 

5        Penrith Child Friendly City Strategy                                                                               

12  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Mark Davies seconded Councillor Kath Presdee

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Penrith Child Friendly City Strategy be received.

2.     Council endorse the Penrith Child Friendly City Strategy for implementation.

 

6        DA10/0793 Section 96(1A) Modification to DA08/0958 for the Extension of Operating Hours (SITA) Lot 1 DP 542395 and Lot 740 DP 810111 (No. 1725a) Elizabeth Drive, Badgerys Creek Applicant: Mullane Planning Consultants;  Owner: Sita Enviromental Solutions Facility & Education Centre                                                                            

13  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Mark Davies

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on DA10/0793 Section 96(1A) Modification to DA08/0958 for the Extension of Operating Hours (SITA) Lot 1 DP 542395 and Lot 740 DP 810111 (No. 1725a) Elizabeth Drive, Badgerys Creek be received.

2.     DA10/0793 Section 96(1A) Modification to DA08/0958 for the Extension of Operating Hours (SITA) Lot 1 DP 542395 and Lot 740 DP 810111 (No. 1725a) Elizabeth Drive, Badgerys Creek be refused for the following reasons:

2.1      The proposal is likely to result in adverse environmental impacts with respect to light spillage which have not been adequately addressed by the proponent

2.2      The proposal will have an adverse impact on the amenity of the local area

2.3      The proposal is not in the public interest as it is likely to result in land use conflicts and a decrease in the amenity of adjoining neighbours

2.4      The proposal is not compatible with the zone objectives of the E2 Environmental Conservation and RU2 Rural Landscape zones as prescribed by Penrith LEP 2010

2.5      The proposal, if approved, would create an undesirable precedent in Penrith’s rural zones

3.     Those making submissions be notified of the determination.

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Kaylene Allison

 

Councillor Prue Guillaume

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Kath Presdee

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow

 

Councillor Marko Malkoc

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

Councillor Robert Ardill

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Tanya Davies

 

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM

 

 

A Liveable City

 

7        Tender Reference 11/12-09, Supply and Delivery of Pavers and Bluestone Kerbs     

14  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Mark Davies seconded Councillor John Thain that the information contained in the report on Tender Reference 11/12-09, Supply and Delivery of Pavers and Bluestone Kerbs be received.

 

8        Tender Reference Number WSR11/12-01, General Hardware                                    

15  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marko Malkoc seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Tender Reference Number WSR11/12-01, General Hardware be received.

2.     The tender from J Blackwood & Son Ltd (also trading as A. E. Baker & Co Pty Ltd) be accepted for all General Hardware products on the basis of a unit price standing offer agreement for a period of 3 years with an option to extend the arrangements for a further 2x1 year periods subject to satisfactory performance and with provision for rise & fall.

3.     The tender from Complete Office Supplies Pty Ltd for the provision of Paper Janitorial Products (20 items) be accepted  on the basis of a unit price standing offer agreement for a period of 3 years with an option to extend the arrangements for a further 2x1 year periods subject to satisfactory performance and with provision for rise & fall.

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch left the meeting, the time being 8:32pm.

Councillor Ben Goldfinch returned to the meeting, the time being 8:34pm.

 

REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS

 

RR 1          Billington Place, Emu Plains - Parking                                                                  

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM requested an urgent report to the next Council meeting concerning parking provisions at this location, including the contributions made by businesses and land owners, and detailing a response concerning the viability of the vacant properties due to the lack of parking turnover.

 

RR 2          Joeys Soccer Club                                                                                                    

Councillor Marko Malkoc requested a memo reply concerning Parker Street Oval, Kingswood. The Club wished to thank Council for the recent upgrades to the canteen and lights, but have requested repairs to the King Street entrance, which has been damaged by heavy vehicles and recent rain.

 

RR 3          Development Application - Luddenham Cemetery                                               

Councillor Prue Guillaume requested a memo reply concerning the re-submitted Development Application for a cemetery at Luddenham.

 

RR 4          Duck Crossing - Drake Street, Penrith                                                                  

Councillor Prue Guillaume requested the Local Traffic Committee investigate the possibility of erecting a duck crossing sign on Drake Street, South Penrith.

 

URGENT BUSINESS

 

UB 1          Passing of Phil Fisher                                                                                               

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM advised the Council of the passing of Phil Fisher who was a long time Council employee and Fire Fighter Captain.

16  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as an urgent matter.

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.

17  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow that Council write a letter of condolence to the family.

 

UB 2          Fundraising Event - Lance Corporal Luke Gavin                                                

Councillor Marko Malkoc requested that Council consider a donation of $440 allocated equally from each Ward’s voted works to assist in providing entertainment for the fund raising event being held for the family of Lance Corporal Luke Gavin.

18  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marko Malkoc seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as an urgent matter.

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.

19  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marko Malkoc seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that $440 be allocated equally from each Ward’s voted works to assist in providing entertainment for the fund raising event being held for the family of Lance Corporal Luke Gavin.

 

UB 3          Leave of Absence Request                                                                                       

The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jackie Greenow requested leave of absence for a period of 22 days, as disclosed in her Councillor request.

20  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Marko Malkoc that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as an urgent matter.

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.

21  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Marko Malkoc that leave of absence be granted to the Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jackie Greenow for a period of 22 days, as detailed in her Councillor request. 

 

UB 4          U3A Cabling Request                                                                                              

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies requested that Council consider funding cabling costs totally $1,600 allocated equally from each Ward’s voted works to support U3A in their effort to support  and provide learning for semi-retired and retired people in a friendly atmosphere.

22  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as an urgent matter.

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.

23  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that Council provide funding for cabling costs totally $1,600 allocated equally from each Ward’s voted works to support U3A in their effort to support  and provide learning for semi-retired and retired people in a friendly atmosphere.


Committee of the Whole

 

24  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marko Malkoc seconded Councillor Prue Guillaume that the meeting adjourn to the Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters, the time being 8:45pm.

 

Councillor Robert Ardill left the meeting, the time being 8:45pm.

 

1        Presence of the Public

 

CW1 RESOLVED on the motion of Councillor Marko Malkoc seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that the press and public be excluded from Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters:

 

Councillor Robert Ardill returned to the meeting, the time being 8:47pm.

 

A Leading City

 

2        Commercial Matter - Council Property - Easement for Underground Gas Main over Part of Woodriff Gardens High St Penrith by Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd                  

 

This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

 

 

A Liveable City

 

3        Commercial Matter - Grave Digging Services                                                                 

 

This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

 

The meeting resumed at 9.08pm and the General Manager reported that the Committee of the Whole met at 8.45pm on Monday, 6 February 2012 the following being present

 

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies, the Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jackie Greenow and Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kaylene Allison, Robert Ardill, Kevin Crameri OAM, Mark Davies, Tanya Davies, Ross Fowler OAM, Ben Goldfinch, Prue Guillaume, Marko Malkoc, Karen McKeown, Kath Presdee and John Thain

 

and the Committee of the Whole excluded the press and public from the meeting for the reasons set out in CW1 and that the Committee of the Whole submitted the following recommendations to Council.

 

 

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS

 

2        Commercial Matter - Council Property - Easement for Underground Gas Main over Part of Woodriff Gardens High St Penrith by Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd             

RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Marko Malkoc seconded Councillor Karen McKeown

CW2 That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Commercial Matter - Council Property - Easement for Underground Gas Main over Part of Woodriff Gardens High St Penrith by Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd be received.

2.     Council grant Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd an Easement for Underground Gas Main 3 metres wide and Variable Width over Lot 3 DP 1051278 and Part Lot 90 DP 752021 High Street, Penrith in accordance with the compensation figure outlined in the summary of the report.

3.     Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd bear all reasonable costs associated with the granting of the easements.

4.     The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all necessary documentation.

 

3        Commercial Matter - Grave Digging Services                                                                 

RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM.

          CW3 That the information contained in the report on Commercial Matter - Grave   Digging Services be received.

 

ADOPTION OF Committee of the Whole

 

25  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch

That the recommendation contained in the Committee of the Whole and shown as CW1, CW2 and CW3 be adopted.

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9.10pm.

 



PENRITH CITY COUNCIL

 

Procedure for Addressing Meetings

 

Anyone can request permission to address a meeting, providing that the number of speakers is limited to three in support of any proposal and three against.

 

Any request about an issue or matter on the Agenda for the meeting can be lodged with the General Manager or Public Officer up until 12 noon on the day of the meeting.

 

Prior to the meeting the person who has requested permission to address the meeting will need to provide the Public Officer with a written statement of the points to be covered during the address in sufficient detail so as to inform the Councillors of the substance of the address and a written copy of any questions to be asked of the Council in order that responses to those questions can be provided in due course.

 

In addition, prior to addressing the meeting a person addressing Council or Committee will be informed that they do not enjoy any privilege and that permission to speak may be withdrawn should they make inappropriate comments.

 

It should be noted that persons who wish to address the Council are addressing a formal part of the Council Meeting. All persons addressing the Meeting should give consideration to their dress attire. Smart casual is a minimum that is thought to be appropriate when addressing such a forum.

 

It should be noted that speakers at meetings of the Council or Committee do not have absolute privilege (parliamentary privilege).  A speaker who makes any potentially offensive or defamatory remarks about any other person may render themselves open to legal action.

 

Prior to addressing the meeting the person will be required to sign the following statement:

 

“I (name) understand that the meeting I intend to address on (date) is a public meeting.  I also understand that should I say or present any material that is inappropriate, I may be subject to legal action.  I also acknowledge that I have been informed to obtain my own legal advice about the appropriateness of the material that I intend to present at the above mentioned meeting”.

 

Should a person fail to sign the above statement then permission to address either the Council or Committee will not be granted.

 

The Public Officer or Minute Clerk will speak to those people who have requested permission to address the meeting, prior to the meeting at 7.15pm.

 

It is up to the Council or Committee to decide if the request to address the meeting will be granted.

 

Where permission is to be granted the Council or Committee, at the appropriate time, will suspend only so much of the Standing Orders to allow the address to occur.

 

The Chairperson will then call the person up to the lectern or speaking area.

 

The person addressing the meeting needs to clearly indicate:

 

· Their name;

 

· Organisation or group they are representing (if applicable);

 

· Details of the issue to be addressed and the item number of the report in the Business Paper;

 

· Whether they are opposing or supporting the issue or matter (if applicable) and the action they would like the meeting to take;

 

·           The interest of the speaker (e.g. affected person, neighbour, applicant, applicants spokesperson, interested citizen etc).

 

Each person then has five minutes to make their address.  Those addressing Council will be required to speak to the written statement they have submitted.  Permission to address Council is not to be taken as an opportunity to refute or otherwise the points made by previous speakers on the same issue. 

 

The Council or Committee can extend this time if they consider if appropriate, however, everyone needs to work on the basis that the address will be for five minutes only.

 

Councillors may have questions about the address so people are asked to remain at the lectern or in the speaking area until the Chairperson has thanked them.

 

When this occurs, they should then return to their seat.

 

Glenn McCarthy

Public Officer

02 4732 7649                                                     

   

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


Mayoral Minutes

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

1        The passing of Isobel Lowe

 

2        Community pulls together over severe storm event

 

3        Nepean Legacy 50th Anniversary

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A City of Opportunities

Mayoral Minute

The passing of Isobel Lowe

Strategic Objective: A Council that involves, informs and responds (10)

           

 

I wish to acknowledge the passing of a St Marys stalwart, Isobel Lowe.

 

Isobel, with her husband Neville, was a dedicated supporter of the St Marys Development Committee. Isobel is also very well known to many in our community, having worked in schools right up until she began treatment for oesophageal cancer.

 

Isobel worked in the office at North St Marys and was the senior administration officer at St Clair Primary School until her illness. She was a life member of St Marys South P & C, which her children attended, and also ran cake stalls at Mamre House.

 

Through her work on the Development Committee, Isobel played a very active role helping with publicity and the administration of the St Marys Spring festival and fun run for around 10 years.

 

Last year at the Festival dinner, Isobel and her husband Neville celebrated their 51st wedding anniversary. Isobel’s death will be deeply felt by Neville, their four children and three grandchildren as well as so many in our community and our thoughts are with them.

 

Councillor Greg Davies

Mayor

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the Mayoral Minute on The passing of Isobel Lowe be received.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A City of Opportunities

Mayoral Minute

Community pulls together over severe storm event

Strategic Objective: A Council that involves, informs and responds (10)

           

 

The Penrith City community, as they always do in time of crisis, banded together and helped each other with the severe storm event we experienced on the evening of Thursday 9 February.

 

The hardest hit suburbs included Londonderry, Castlereagh, Cranebrook, Jamisontown and Kingswood and a number of residents suffered property damage and loss as a result of the severe storm.

 

I commend the community for remaining calm in the face of rising waters.

Throughout the evening and in the following days I received continuous updates on what was happening and the great work that our local SES and emergency services were doing in assisting the community.

 

The event was in excess of a 1 in 100 year event. A once in a lifetime event, which saw as much as 120ml fall in a few hours in some parts of the City. That amount of rainfall would have had the same effect regardless of where it fell, whether it was Smithfield, Merrylands or Mosman.

 

On Friday 10 February I spoke with the Premier and our local State and Federal members to ascertain how we could best assist those affected.

 

Formal representations were made to the State Government to declare the event a natural disaster, which they have now done. This triggers financial assistance to those requiring it through the State and Federal Governments’ Natural Disaster Relief Funds.

 

We will ensure that the community is made aware of the assistance this will provide.

Some residents are also concerned about their eligibility for insurance cover from some companies and this is something I will also take up with our local members.

 

In the meantime, there were a number of things Council did to help ease the pain for those affected in our community:

 

·    Emergency crews, who worked on that weekend and the following weeks to clean up and assist the community.

·    Organisation of special waste collections for debris and fencing and so forth were organised for that weekend and beyond.

·    Replacement household waste bins were organised

·    Compassionate payment options for rates payment are available for eligible residents.

·    A letter of support from the Mayor to insurance companies will be written if required.

·    Investigating the organisation of a fundraising appeal to assist those most affected.

 

Clearly the severity of the event and the consequences require a detailed investigation and I have requested the General Manager to report back to Council on this at the earliest opportunity.

 

We will continue to work with our local communities in the cleanup of this event and I thank everyone involved for their assistance to date.

 

Councillor Greg Davies

Mayor

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the Mayoral Minute on Community pulls together over severe storm event be received.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A City of Opportunities

Mayoral Minute

Nepean Legacy 50th Anniversary

Strategic Objective: A Council that involves, informs and responds (10)

           

 

This week I will be attending the 50th Anniversary celebration of Nepean Legacy, an event to acknowledge their 50 years of service to local families of Australian war veterans.

 

Nepean Legacy was officially formed in 1962 to assist the families of men who had served in the world wars. Since then Nepean Legacy and the volunteers and staff who run the organisation have helped over 10,000 families in the local area.

 

Currently, Nepean Legacy cares for around 600 families including relatives of people who have fought in Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan. They offer advice on healthcare, government assistance, educational assistance and finance and legal issues. They also coordinate a number of events and programs throughout the year to raise money and further support widows and their children.

 

The support of members and volunteers has been instrumental in the success and longevity of Nepean Legacy. In particular I’d like to acknowledge long serving member David Trist, who has served as a Legatee (member of Legacy) for the last 50 years. David has cared for a number of people in their time of need and his commitment to the organisation and to people affected by war should be commended.

 

I’d like to congratulate Nepean Legacy on their 50 years of service and acknowledge their efforts to assist families affected by war in our local area. I’d like to also thank the members, volunteers and staff for their ongoing contribution to the organisation and to the community.

 

 

Councillor Greg Davies

Mayor

  

RECOMMENDATION

That the Mayoral Minute on Nepean Legacy 50th Anniversary be received.

 

 

  


Reports of Committees

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

1        Report and Recommendation of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 6 February 2012

 

2        Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 13 February 2012

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A Liveable City

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
 Local Traffic Committee MEETING

HELD ON 6 February, 2012

 

 

 

PRESENT

Michael Alderton – Road Network Services Engineer (Chairperson), Adam Wilkinson – Engineering Services Manager, Wayne Mitchell – Group Manager City Infrastructure, Councillor Karen McKeown, James Suprain – Roads & Maritime Services, Senior Constable Mark Elliott – St Marys Police, David Drozd – Senior Traffic Engineer and Jacob Strong – Trainee Engineer

 

IN ATTENDANCE

Darrell Boggs – Ranger, Phil Davies - Westbus

 

 APOLOGIES

Apologies were accepted from the Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jackie Greenow and Ruth Byrnes - Senior Traffic Officer.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 5 December 2011

The minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting of 5 December 2011 were confirmed.  Note Item 2 Billington Place Car Park, Emu Plains – Request for Provision of 2-Hour Parking Restrictions was amended by Council at the Ordinary Meeting on 12 December 2011, at Minute No. 337.  This recommendation was amended to read as follows:

 

LTC 123 That a further report be brought to a future Council Meeting on this item including an audit of current and future parking needs in the area including shops at the Great Western Highway.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 There were no declarations of interest.

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

A Liveable City

 

1        Roads & Maritime Services Delegations to Council                                                       

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Roads & Maritime Services Delegations to Council be received.

2.     The Local Traffic Committee and Council note the information.

 

 

 

 

2        Stafford Street, Kingswood - Proposed Provision of "No Stopping" Restrictions      

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Stafford Street, Kingswood - Proposed Provision of "No Stopping" Restrictions be received.

2.     “No Stopping” restrictions be implemented for a distance of 10m from the kerb alignment in Parker Street on the northern side of Stafford Street, Kingswood, east of Parker Street, to reinforce the statutory restrictions.

3.     The existing “No Stopping” sign located on the northern side of Stafford Street, Kingswood, 40m west of Somerset Street, be moved approximately 1m east.

 

 

3        Rochford Street, St Clair - Speeding Vehicles                                                                

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Rochford Street, St Clair - Speeding Vehicles be received.

2.     The project for mid-block traffic calming improvements in Rochford Street, St Clair be entered into Council’s Traffic Facility Prioritisation Program.  When the project receives priority against other listed sites, Council’s Design Co-ordinator be requested to prepare a design for the location, with a further report submitted to the Local Traffic Committee for design plan consideration.

3.     The resident be advised of Council’s resolution.

 

 

4        Castlereagh Road, Penrith - AAGPS "Head of the River" Event                                

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Castlereagh Road, Penrith - AAGPS "Head of the River" Event be received.

2.     The Event Applicant be advised that this is a Class 2 Event under the “Guide to Traffic and Transport Management for Special Events” and that all conditions and requirements specified in the Guide must be complied with prior to the event.

3.     The Traffic Management Plan submitted by Event Applicant detailing the proposed temporary road closures for the event to be held on Saturday 10 March 2012 be endorsed.

4.     A Traffic Management Plan including a Risk Management Plan be lodged by the Event Applicant with the Roads and Maritime Services for concurrence, prior to the event.  A copy of the Roads and Maritime Services’ concurrence must be submitted to Council prior to the event.

5.     The Event Applicant obtain separate approval from the NSW Police and submit a Schedule 1 Form under the Summary Offences Act to the NSW Police prior to the event.  A copy of the NSW Police approval must be submitted to Council prior to the event.

6.     The Event Applicant submit to Council a copy of Public Liability Insurance (usually a Certificate of Currency) of minimum $10 million, prior to the event.  In addition, the Event Applicant indemnify Council in writing against all claims for damage and injury which may result from the proposed event.

7.     A detailed Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by a qualified and certified professional and submitted to Council, the Roads and Maritime Services and NSW Police prior to the event should traffic management arrangements be put in place.

8.     The Event Applicant arrange to place barricades and provide Roads and Maritime Services accredited Traffic Controllers where required by the endorsed Traffic Management Plan.  Where the Traffic Management and Traffic Control Plans indicate, Traffic Controllers are to be used.  All Traffic Controllers must have current Roads and Maritime Services certification.

9.     The Event Applicant provide variable message signs (VMS) in appropriate locations as detailed in the Traffic Management Plan.  VMS boards should be located in accordance with the Roads and Maritime Services Technical Direction TDT2010/07.

10.   The event organiser notify ambulance and fire brigade (NSW Fire Brigade and RFS) and SES of the proposed event and submit a copy of the notification to Council prior to the event.

11.   The Event Applicant notify private bus companies of the proposed event and submit a copy of the notification to Council prior to the event.  Bus companies shall be requested to advertise the changed route for affected buses at least one week prior to, and during, the event.

12.   Should the consultation process resolve to temporarily relocate bus stops or bus routes that were not indicated in the original Traffic Management Plan, a further report will be required to be submitted to the next available Local Traffic Committee meeting.

13.   The Event Applicant shall ensure that noise control measures are in place as required by the protection of the Environment Operations (Noise Control) Regulation 2000.

14.   All works as part of this approval are conducted at no cost to Council.

15.   The applicant be advised of Council’s resolution.

16.   Council reserves the right to cancel this approval at any time.

 

 

5        High Street, Penrith – Proposed Blister Island Treatment at Signalised Pedestrian Crossing fronting Penrith Public School                                                                                         

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on High Street, Penrith – Proposed Blister Island Treatment at Signalised Pedestrian Crossing fronting Penrith Public School be received.

2.     Notification of the proposed works be forwarded to affected businesses and property owners.

3.     Council’s Design Co-ordinator be requested to prepare a design plan of the proposed facility, with a further report submitted to the Local Traffic Committee for design plan finalisation and endorsement.

4.     Costs associated with the design and construction of kerb blisters and associated linemarking be funded from the 2011/2012 Urgent Local Traffic Committee Facilities budget.

5.     The Penrith Public School Principal and the Roads and Maritime Services be advised of Council’s resolution.

 

 

6        Brisbane Street, Oxley Park - Proposed Traffic Calming Devices                                

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Brisbane Street, Oxley Park - Proposed Traffic Calming Devices be received.

2.     Community consultation be conducted with affected residents regarding loss of parking associated with the facilities, and any substantial objections be referred back to the Local Traffic Committee.

3.     Subject to no substantial objections, Design Plan AB 166 for installation of three Watts Profile speed humps be finalised and endorsed for construction.

 

 

7        Union Road, Penrith - Proposed Provision of "No Right Turn" Restriction at Mulgoa Road, Penrith                                                                                                                     

LTC Comment

A further three submissions were received from residents regarding the provision of a “No Right Turn” restriction.  Two of these submissions were in support of the proposal, and one was opposed to the proposal.

 

The submission opposing the right-turn ban raised concerns regarding delays that would be caused at Worth Street and High Street, comments that the intersection is not dangerous and a refuge is not needed, and other comments regarding the need for a cycleway and that the project is a waste of money.

 

These concerns have been addressed in the report and are similar to matters raised in previous submissions by another resident.

 

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Union Road, Penrith - Proposed Provision of "No Right Turn" Restriction at Mulgoa Road, Penrith be received.

2.     The proposed “No Right Turn” restriction in Union Road, at the intersection of Mulgoa Road, Penrith be endorsed, subject to no further substantial objections being received.

3.     A Traffic Management Plan for the proposed “No Right Turn” restriction in Union Road, at the intersection of Mulgoa Road, Penrith be referred to the Roads and Maritime Services for determination.

4.     Those people who made submissions regarding the proposal be advised of Council’s resolution.

5.     The Design Plan No. AM176, Issue A, dated 22/12/11 for the pedestrian refuge be endorsed for construction, subject to approval of the Traffic Management Plan by the Roads and Maritime Services.

6.     Funding for the works be through Council and the Roads and Maritime Services in accordance with the funding agreement for the NSW Bike Plan (2011/2012) (DT05202).

 

 

8        Mulgoa Rise Stage 1A - Endorsement of Signs & Linemarking Plans                         

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Mulgoa Rise Stage 1A - Endorsement of Signs & Linemarking Plans be received.

2.     The signage and linemarking plan prepared by J Wyndham Prince for Mulgoa Rise Stage 1A, Plan No. 8983/CC105, be endorsed.

3.     J Wyndham Prince be advised of Council’s resolution.

 

 

9        Derby Street & Colless Street, Penrith - Proposed Pedestrian Refuge Island             

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Derby Street & Colless Street, Penrith - Proposed Pedestrian Refuge Island be received.

2.     Community consultation be conducted with affected residents regarding loss of parking associated with the facilities, and any substantial objections be referred back to the Local Traffic Committee.

3.     Subject to no substantial objections, Design Plan AD 127 for installation of a pedestrian refuge facility be finalised and endorsed for construction.

 

 

10      Lawson Street & Belmore Street, Penrith - Proposed Pedestrian Refuge Island        

LTC Comment

 

The Committee noted that Council officers had previously written to the Roads and Maritime Services requesting their consideration of providing a pedestrian refuge on Belmore Street at the same intersection, as Belmore Street is a State Road under the control and management of the Roads and Maritime Services.

 

It was also noted that a response had not been received from the RMS regarding this request.

 

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Lawson Street & Belmore Street, Penrith - Proposed Pedestrian Refuge Island be received.

2.     Design Plan AL 139 for installation of a pedestrian refuge facility on Lawson Street at Belmore Street, Penrith be finalised and endorsed for construction.

3.     Council write to the Roads and Maritime Services and request an update on the progress of investigations into the provision of a pedestrian refuge on Belmore Street, Penrith.

 

 

11      Peachtree Road, Penrith - Proposed Provision of "No Stopping" & "No Parking" Restrictions                                                                                                                         

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Peachtree Road, Penrith - Proposed Provision of "No Stopping" & "No Parking" Restrictions be received.

2.     Full-time “No Stopping” restrictions be implemented on the southern side of Peachtree Road, Penrith for a distance of 20m from its intersection with Castlereagh Road, and full-time “No Parking” restrictions be implemented beyond this point for the length of the site’s frontage to Peachtree Road, in accordance with plan A004 A dated January 2012 as amended in red.

3.     All works be undertaken at no cost to Council.

4.     The applicant be advised of Council’s resolution.

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

GB 1          Glossop Street, St Marys – Implementation of “Bus Zone”  (Raised Council)    

The Local Traffic Committee, at its meeting of 5 December 2011, considered a report on “Glossop Street, St Marys – Request for Parking Restrictions”.  At its Ordinary Meeting on 12 December 2011, Council resolved (in part), on the recommendation of the Committee,  “that ‘No Stopping’ restrictions be implemented on Glossop Street, St Marys in the northbound lane between King Street and Phillip Street”.

 

A “Bus Stop” in the northbound lane, near 151-153 Glossop Street, has been located during the implementation of the restrictions.  Council’s records do not indicate whether this location is an approved “Bus Stop” and, in addition, the stop is not listed on Council’s Transit Stop Register.

 

Westbus has advised, however, that the “Bus Stop” is in service by the 774 route and they have requested it be retained and not rescinded.

 

To reinforce this “Bus Stop” within the “No Stopping” zone, it is recommended that a “Bus Zone” be implemented for 20m.  It is unclear if the change from “Bus Stop” to “Bus Zone” triggers the upgrade of the stop to full Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA) compliance.  Council has previously written to Transport for NSW (formerly the Department of Transport) regarding a similar situation and will again write to Transport for NSW to confirm the requirements for this situation.  In addition, Transport for NSW will be requested to provide advice with regard to responsibilities for providing infrastructure to comply with the DDA if required.

 

RECOMMENDED

 

          That:

 

1.         The existing “Bus Stop” near 151 Glossop Street, St Marys be signposted and formalised as a 20m “Bus Zone”.

 

2.         Transport for NSW be advised of Council’s resolution and be requested to provide advice with regard to responsibilities for providing Disability Discrimination Act 1992 compliant infrastructure at the new “Bus Zone”.

 

 

 GB 2         Coreen Avenue, Penrith – Proposed Provision of New Roundabout for North Penrith Development  (Raised Council)                                                                                                   

Council’s Road Network Services Engineer circulated a design plan to the Committee to consider a request from Landcom for endorsement of plans for the provision of a new roundabout on Coreen Avenue, Penrith, for access into the new residential development off Coreen Avenue, known as North Penrith.  The Committee was advised that the proposed roundabout is the main access into the new development and was endorsed through the strategic planning for the residential estate.  Council officers had investigated other options into intersection controls at the location, however a roundabout is the preferred option.

 

Advice from Council’s Development Engineers is that the roundabout complies with numerical standards set out in Austroads and that a Stage 3 Road Safety Audit had been conducted.

 

LTC Comment

 

The Committee was advised that Council’s Traffic Officers and RMS officers had reviewed the plans and raised the following concerns:

 

1.   Deflection for westbound vehicles should be assessed with the view of reducing the deflection.  These concerns were raised in respect of the efficiency of the intersection, in particular, due to the use of heavy vehicles at the intersection and the perceived likelihood of a vehicle leaving the road and crashing into the property on the corner.

 

It was noted that the deflection provided was approximately the maximum desirable in Austroads, however this deflection may not be suitable for the roundabout at this location.

 

2.   Deflection for eastbound vehicles appears minimal.  A consistent approach to deflection for each direction needs to be addressed and considered.

 

3.   Safe intersection sight distance needs to be addressed for vehicles in the new road.  Sight lines cannot run through private land.

 

4.   Pedestrian connectivity for Coreen Avenue has not been catered for in the form of a refuge in the median islands.  The Committee requires further information regarding pedestrian desire lines and required facilities.

 

5.   The setback of the pedestrian refuge in the new road requires a significant pedestrian detour.  This may trigger the need for pedestrian fencing to stop pedestrians crossing mid-intersection.  Further, crossing sight distance needs to be compliant.

 

6.   Other issues, such as non-compliant signage and linemarking and heavy vehicle detours, need to be addressed and amended.

 

RECOMMENDED

That the provision of a roundabout on Coreen Avenue, Penrith, for access into the North Penrith Army Land development, be supported in principle, subject to the developer being required to investigate the concerns raised by the Local Traffic Committee and a further plan being prepared by the applicant and referred back to the Committee for endorsement prior to any approvals being granted for the works.

 

GB 3          Second Avenue & O’Connell Street, Kingswood – Withdrawal of Bus Services  (Raised Westbus)                                                                                                                          

The Westbus representative advised that from Monday, 6 February 2012, Westbus will no longer operate bus services via Second Avenue and O’Connell Street, Kingswood.

The Westbus representative provided a copy of a note to all drivers that stated:

“Due to safety concerns when buses are turning Left from Second avenue in to O’Connell Street at Kingswood, all 774, 775 and 776 services will be diverted commencing Monday 6th February 2012.

Travelling to Penrith the 774 Service will operate Direct along the Great Western Highway to Bringelly Road and turn left and travel down Bringelly road to Derby Street where the bus will resume normal route. This service will operate in reverse back towards St Marys

The 775 and 776 services will be required to operate the 770 route through Claremont Meadows between Gipps Street and Second ave, then continue normal route. Buses travelling towards St Marys are to operate in the reverse back to St Marys…..”

 

LTC Comment

The Committee requested further advice from the Westbus representative regarding reasons for diverting services that were not affected by the left-turn.  The Westbus representative was also requested to advise what had prompted the discussions.

 

The Westbus representative advised that all services were diverted to maintain a consistent route, despite the St Marys to Penrith service not being required to turn left at the subject intersection.  The diversion was prompted by buses reportedly hitting the barriers causing damage to buses, despite many buses being able to make the turn without hitting the barriers.

 

RECOMMENDED

That the Committee note the information.

 

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed, the time being 10:45am.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 6 February, 2012 be adopted.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A Leading City

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
 Policy Review Committee MEETING

HELD ON 13 February, 2012

 

 

 

PRESENT

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies and Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Kevin Crameri OAM, Mark Davies, Ross Fowler OAM, Prue Guillaume, Marko Malkoc, Karen McKeown, Kath Presdee and John Thain.

 

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Leave of Absence was previously granted to the Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jackie Greenow for a period of 22 days, as disclosed in her Councillor request.

APOLOGIES

Apologies were received for Councillors Robert Ardill, Tanya Davies, Ben Goldfinch and Kaylene Allison.

 

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Greg Davies provided the Councillors with information  on the effects of the storm event that occurred on Thursday 9 February 2012 and gave an update on the relief actions currently being carried out by Council Officers and other local authorities to assist the community affected by the event.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Policy Review Committee Meeting - 5 December 2011

The minutes of the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 5 December 2011 were confirmed.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

There were no declarations of interest.

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

A Leading City

 

2        Information Communication and Technology (ICT) Productivity Project

Group Manager Finance, Vicki O’Kelly introduced the report and together with Services Development Officer, Michael Rudd gave a presentation on the Productivity Project.

RECOMMENDED

That the information contained in the report on Information Communication and Technology (ICT) Productivity Project be received.

 

 

 

 

A City of Opportunities

 

3        Fire Safety in Nursing Homes

Development Services Manager, Paul Lemm introduced the report and invited Building Approvals Co-ordinator, Colin Wood and Fire Safety Team Leader, Craig Squires to give a presentation.                       

RECOMMENDED

That the information contained in the report on Fire Safety in Nursing Homes be received.

 

A Liveable City

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM  left the meeting, the time being 8:13pm and did not return.

 

6        Billington Place Car Park, Emu Plains - Request for Provision of 2-Hour Parking Restrictions

Engineering Services Manager, Adam Wilkinson introduced the report and gave a presentation.        

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.    The information contained in the report on Billington Place Car Park, Emu Plains - Request for Provision of 2-Hour Parking Restrictions be received.

2.    Council prepare a detailed submission to Transport for NSW seeking their urgent review and reconsideration of our request for the allocation of 61 (2P) parking spaces in Billington Place, Emu Plains.

3.     Council further write to Transport for NSW, the minister for Transport, the Minister for Roads and the local Members of Parliament to seek engagement in the review process of parking requirements around Railway Stations including Emu Plains Railway Station.

4.     A detailed audit be conducted to determine the current usage and demand within the Billington Place car park and other surrounding car parks in the vicinity.

5.     Council investigates the implementation of a park in marked bay scheme along the length of Railway Row.

6.     The shop owners and shop keepers who signed the petition be advised of the response from the Roads and Maritime Services and Council’s resolution.

 

A Leading City

 

1        NSW Planning System Review - Discussion Paper Submission

Group Manager People and Places, Roger Nethercote introduced the report.

 

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM  left the meeting, the time being 8:52pm.

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM  returned to the meeting, the time being 8:55pm.

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on NSW Planning System Review - Discussion Paper Submission be received

2.     The attached submission be forwarded to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for consideration in the review process.

 

 

A City of Opportunities

 

4        Legislative Assembly Committee on Transport & Infrastructure Inquiry into the Utilisation of Rail Corridors - Invitation for Submission                                                                 

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Legislative Assembly Committee on Transport & Infrastructure Inquiry into the Utilisation of Rail Corridors - Invitation for Submission be received.

2.     A detailed submission, based on the content of this report, be made to the Legislative Assembly Committee on Transport & Infrastructure Inquiry into the Utilisation of Rail Corridors.

 

 

A Vibrant City

 

5        Release of Swimming Pools Act 1992 Review and Discussion Paper

Development Services Manager, Paul Lemm introduced the report.

Councillor Karen McKeown  left the meeting, the time being 9:17pm.

Councillor Karen McKeown  returned to the meeting, the time being 9:20pm.

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.   The information contained in the report on Release of Swimming Pools Act 1992 Review and Discussion Paper be received.

2.   Council respond to the discussion paper with the recommendations outlined in this report, and continue to lobby for improved changes in swimming pool safety legislation to ensure drownings of young children are prevented.

3.   A copy of the Council’s submission to the Discussion Paper be forwarded to the Samuel Morris Foundation.

 

 

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9:29pm.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 13 February, 2012 be adopted.

 

 

  



DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

 

A Leading City

 

1        Delivery Program Six Month Progress Report

 

2        2011-12 Operational Plan - December Quarter Review

 

3        2012 Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) National General Assembly of Local Government

 

4        Summary of Investments for the period 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012

 

A City of Opportunities

 

5        Development Application DA11/1034 existing masonry outbuilding, front boundary fence and entrance gate at Lot 816 DP 1068323 (No. 174 - 186) Capitol Hill Drive, Mount Vernon Applicant: Patrick Hurley;  Owner: Cornelius D Cipri & Catrina Stylianou

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

  

A Liveable City

 

6        Tender Reference 11/12-06, Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services Minor Buildings

 

7        Tender Reference 11/12-07, Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services Major Buildings

  

 


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


A Leading City

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

1        Delivery Program Six Month Progress Report

 

2        2011-12 Operational Plan - December Quarter Review

 

3        2012 Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) National General Assembly of Local Government

 

4        Summary of Investments for the period 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A Leading City

 

 

1

Delivery Program Six Month Progress Report   

 

Compiled by:               Allegra Zakis, Strategic Planning Coordinator

Tanya Jackson, Strategic Planning Coordinator

Wendy Connell, Planner (Engagement)

Authorised by:            Ruth Goldsmith, Group Manager - Leadership   

 

Objective

We demonstrate accountability, transparency and ethical conduct

Community Outcome

A Council that manages its finances, services and assets effectively (4)

Strategic Response

Deliver services for the City and its communities, and maintain our long term financial sustainability (4.1)

       

 

Executive Summary

This report is presented by the General Manager, and outlines Council’s progress towards implementing its four-year Delivery Program for the six month period of July 2011 to December 2011.  The report and accompanying Delivery Program Progress Report (attached) detail the progress of Council’s 21 programs, including a summary of key program highlights and challenges.

 

The Delivery Program Progress Report shows that all of Council’s 21 programs were ‘on track’ on 31 December 2011.  Of the 37 Delivery Program indicators, 35 are ‘on track’ and 2 indicators ‘need focus’. 

 

Key highlights for the six months include:

·     10 awards won

·     Howell Oval / CUA Stadium works completed

·     Domestic Violence Resource Project successfully completed

·     New pathways projects completed

·     Sporting facilities upgraded

·     Waste to landfill reduced

·     $28 million of Construction Certificates and $225 million of Development Applications approved

·     Progress on longer term housing supply projects including Penrith Lakes, North Penrith, Glenmore Park Stage 2 and Jordan Springs.

 

This report should be read in conjunction with the Operational Plan Quarterly Report for October to December 2011 which includes detailed information on budget and a comprehensive list of tasks completed during this reporting period.  

 

This report recommends that the Delivery Program Progress Report (enclosed and forwarded separately to Councillors) is received.

Background

The Integrated Planning and Reporting (IPR) Legislation requires the General Manager to report Council’s progress on the Delivery Program every six months.  The Delivery Program must address the full range of Council’s operations, specifically outlining the principal activities Council will undertake over that four year period in response to the outcomes identified in the Community Strategic Plan.

 

This Progress Report is the fifth in a series of eight that charts the organisations progress in implementing the Delivery Program 2009-2013.  This report focuses on the six months from July-December 2011.

Key results

Council has continued to work towards achieving the adopted Delivery Program activities over the period July 2011 to December 2011.  This report provides a summary of the key results, highlights and challenges.  More detailed information, including the program budgets, can be found in the Delivery Progress Report which is attached to this report.  Overall the results demonstrate that:

·     all 21 Programs are on target

·     99% of program (service) activities are ‘on target’

·     95% of program indicators are ‘on target’.

 

A summary of Council’s progress against the programs, indicators and priorities is presented in the table below.

 

 

On target  ü

Challenge  X

At risk  Q

Overall Program Status

21

0

0

Identified priorities

42

0

0

Programs (Service) activities

117

1

0

Program Indicators

35

2

0

 

Priorities

The priorities in the Delivery Program 2009-2013 highlight the actions that our communities and partners felt were particularly important.  These are the actions on which Council should focus its efforts, while continuing to deliver its ongoing programs.  The priorities are particularly significant in considering the allocation of Council’s staff and funding resources over the four years of the Delivery Program.  All of the 42 Delivery Program priorities are ‘on target’.

 

Service activities

One service activity has been identified as a challenge, in the Strategic Planning Program – ‘coordinating Council’s strategic research program within an integrated organisational policy framework’.  A key component of this service activity is the preparation of the City Planning Strategy, which will consolidate Council’s adopted strategies relating to the City’s people and places into one document.  Other organisational priorities have prevented significant progress being made on this task, however a way forward has now been identified and it is anticipated that it will be back on target by June 2012.

 

Program Indicators

Two program indicators are currently identified as ‘challenges’.  The first indicator sits within the Environmental Health Program.  The staff position with the responsibility for encouraging private landowners to protect biodiversity has been vacant for six months; therefore minimal progress has been made on the indicator which measures the number of landowners interested in protecting biodiversity.  Council has been actively seeking to fill this position, to enable progress with this indicator.

 

An indicator under Roads, Footpaths and Buildings has also been identified as a challenge – the number of bus shelters constructed each year.  There is still no resolution with Transport for NSW as to the accessibility requirements for bus shelters and the program has been delayed as a result.  Work has continued to be done to develop a new design, and alternate means of delivering bus shelters that can cater to all in the community.  Once details have been finalised it is expected that construction of new shelters and retrofitting of old shelters to comply with the new requirements can begin. 

 

More detailed information is included in the attached progress report, which should be read in conjunction with the Operational Plan Quarterly Report for October to December 2011.  The Operational Plan report includes information on the progress of individual service activities and tasks, detailed information on budget and a comprehensive list of tasks completed over the reporting period.

Highlights

A number of projects have been completed or reached significant milestones over the reporting period.  These are summarised below.  More detailed information is included in the attached Progress Report.

 

10 awards won

During the reporting period Council won the following four awards:

·     2011 Cancer Council’s Alive and Well Partnership Award

·     Robert Wilson OAM Award for Regional Co-operation Initiatives

·     2011 Keep Australia Beautiful Waste Minimisation Award

·     Overall winner in the Waste Avoidance Category for the Organic Recycling and Composting Program - LGSA Excellence in the Environment Awards.

 

In addition, we also received a ‘highly commended’ in six other awards, ranging from tourism to risk management.

 

Howell Oval / CUA Stadium works completed

Upgrading works on Howell Oval / CUA Stadium have now been completed, resulting in significant improvements to these facilities, particularly the pavilion, indoor wickets, car park, landscaping and spectator access.

 

Domestic Violence Resource Project

The Domestic Violence Resource Project was highly successful, with 16 training sessions delivered to almost 400 participants.  This project was funded by the Western Sydney Area Assistance Scheme and aimed to provide community workers with a consistent referral process for clients dealing with domestic and family violence issues.  A resource kit for community workers was also developed as part of the project.

 

New pathways projects completed

Council continues to implement the missing links footpath program and the shared pathways program, with over 2.5 km of new footpaths and shared pathways completed from July 2011 to December 2011.  New footpaths have been constructed in Stafford St, Kingswood; Lewis Rd, Cambridge Gardens and Pendock Road, Cranebrook.  A shared pathway funded by Roads and Maritime Services has also been constructed from Worth St to Nepean Avenue, Penrith.

 

Sporting facilities upgraded

Numerous sports facilities have benefitted from a range of field, building and sporting amenity upgrades, including:

·     Doug Rennie Fields, Kingswood  - irrigation, new posts

·     Eileen Cammack Reserve, Penrith – reconstruction of soccer fields

·     Jamison Park, Penrith – upgrade of synthetic long jump surfaces, upgrade discus cage

·     Blair Oval, St Marys – installation of 2 judges stands, 2 long jump run ups

·     Mark Leece Oval, St Clair – reconstruction of 3 playing fields, irrigation works

·     Andrews Road baseball facility – commence construction of batting cages

·     Parker St, Penrith – installation of a bore for watering the sports fields, upgrade lighting and soccer canteen

·     Gow Park, Mulgoa – commence installation of a bore for watering the sports fields

·     Ched Towns Reserve, Glenmore Park – resurfacing of the Rugby League fields and installation of 100 Lux floodlighting to the football fields

 

These upgrades increase the utility of these facilities, and are part of a continuing program of sports field upgrades.

 

Waste to landfill reduced

Council set a target of 58% of waste being diverted from landfill, as part of our ongoing campaign to reduce waste to landfill and so increase resource recovery.  This was exceeded during the reporting period, with 65% of waste collected by Council diverted from landfill.  Not only is this a significant achievement in terms of sustainability and resource recovery, but it also represents a significant cost saving. 

 

Facilitating development in the City

A total of 218 Construction Certificates were approved, representing a value of $28 million, as well as almost 700 Development Applications representing a value in excess of $225 million.  These approvals include 1,140 new residential lots across three new release areas – Caddens, Waterside and Jordan Springs – as well as two new employment developments at Erskine Park and a new bowling alley in Batt St, Penrith.

 

Progress on longer term projects and issues

 

The highlights summarised above represent key achievements in the reporting period, however progress has also been made on several longer term projects.  Council has been involved in planning for the former Defence site in North Penrith for many years, attempting to negotiate an outcome which provides a mix of housing and employment opportunities.  This planning has finally come to fruition with the approval of a concept plan for a range of housing styles, retail and community facilities and ancillary infrastructure.  The site will accommodate up to 1,000 dwellings and a commercial centre including retail, commercial and light industrial floor space.  The State Government has approved initial site works as a major project, and Council has approved the construction of 19 dwellings for a mix of housing types.

 

In November the State Government invited owners of larger land holdings to make a submission direct to the Minister for Planning about the suitability of their land for residential development.   Council was given the opportunity to respond to the submissions, and a major analysis of the Penrith and Western Sydney housing supply trends and other factors was commenced.

 

Construction has been completed on the first homes in both Jordan Springs and the second stage of Glenmore Park.  Residents are now moving in, and as construction continues these communities will grow.

 

Council was also a partner in the ‘Future of Penrith – Penrith of the Future’ process, which has been recognised as an innovative approach to defining the future of a City, and generated a high level of interest from other organisations, including State Government, and the local and Sydney media.  Implementation of the outcomes of this process will follow in the coming months.

 

Council has undertaken a review of the management of the City Centre and St Marys Town Centre.  This review has resulted in a successful outcome, with Council approving a new contemporary management model for both these bodies.

Challenges

Council has faced a number of challenges over the past six months, internally and externally.  One of the significant challenges has been the weather with the six months from July to December recording 123.6 mm more rainfall than the average for that period.  This has had a significant impact on Council’s ability to carry out the Parks Asset Renewal Program and general maintenance such as mowing.  Rain is also putting at risk the completion by the end of the year of some capital projects in Roads, Footpaths and Buildings.  As January 2012 has continued to be wetter than average, it is almost inevitable that some renewal works will be delayed into the next financial year.

 

Council has also been impacted by the actions of State Government Departments, particularly the progression of the City-wide Plan, restriction on funding for works in the WELL precinct due to the cap on section 94 contributions and a delay in the issue of Community Safety Plan Guidelines.  Also, a delay in the decision on the final landform of Penrith Lakes is preventing the Nepean River Flood Study from being completed.  These issues will continue to be negotiated with the relevant government departments.

 

Council also continues to work to address longer term and ongoing challenges.  These include skills shortages in the key areas of engineering, planning and children’s services.  The sustainability of an ageing workforce is also an ongoing issue, particularly determining how to ensure that the experience and knowledge of our longer term employees is not lost as they approach retirement.  Council must also continue to resource the implications of legislation and regulatory changes introduced by the State Government.  Unplanned issues have emerged but the organisation has been responsive to these.  Responding to the State Government’s tight timeframes for submissions to the review of potential, new housing precincts is an example.

Conclusion

Overall, Council is in a good position coming into the last 18 months of the current Delivery Program.  All Programs are on track, as are all the identified priorities.  We have achieved a number of significant highlights in the past six months, as well as making progress on some longer term projects and issues.  Council is experiencing some challenges in delivering its services, but generally these can be addressed.  The next Progress Report will cover the period January to June 2012, and will be reported to Council in August, 2012.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the information contained in the report on Delivery Program Six Month Progress Report be received

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

Delivery Program Progress Report

41 Pages

Attachment

  


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A Leading City

 

 

2

2011-12 Operational Plan - December Quarter Review   

 

Compiled by:               Geraldine Brown, Budget Accountant

Andrew Moore, Financial Services Manager

Authorised by:            Vicki O’Kelly, Group Manager - Finance   

 

Objective

We demonstrate accountability, transparency and ethical conduct

Community Outcome

A Council that manages its finances, services and assets effectively (4)

Strategic Response

Deliver services for the City and its communities, and maintain our long term financial sustainability (4.1)

       

 

Executive Summary

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Integrated Planning and Reporting guidelines, Council must prepare a report on the progress of the service activities and tasks in the Operational Plan every 3 months. This review reports on the performance of external and internal services (with the exception of the three controlled entities which have separate reporting requirements) outlined in the 2011-12 Operational Plan.

 

The December Quarter Review covers the second 3 months progress of the 2011-12 Operational Plan. It also forms part of the first six month instalment of year 3 of the Council’s (4 Year) Delivery Program 2009-2013. Progress of the Delivery Program is the subject of another report to tonight’s meeting.

 

The report is divided into two sections:

Section 1:   December Quarter Review of the 2011-12 Operational Plan covering the performance summary of Council’s 44 services, completed tasks and projects and exception reporting.

Section 2:   A review of Council’s Financial Position as at 31 December 2011 including revised estimates identified in the recommended budget.

 

A brief executive summary of the results in each area is provided below.  Attachment 1 – 2011-12 Operational Plan, Services Performance and Financial Review Summary, provides detailed information on all two sections mentioned above, and is also available on Council’s website.  Councillors will receive a copy of the Services Performance and Financial Review Summary report under separate cover as an enclosure to this Business Paper.

 

December Quarter Review Services Performance Summary

 

The combined effort of Council’s 44 services for the period ending 31 December 2011 has resulted in a 51.3% achievement of the yearly requirement as required in the adopted 2011-12 Operational Plan.  This result demonstrated that Council is ‘on target’ at this stage of the year.

 

This assessment of year to date achievement is based upon Council’s Performance Planning System which calculates performance against 116 Service Activities. The system also provides exception reporting indicating that 157 Tasks, 95 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and 220 Capital and Operating Projects were either ‘on target’ or ‘completed’ by 31 December 2011.  A summary of the remaining 11 exception items have been included in this report with further details and the challenges they are facing being included in Attachment 1 – 2011-12 Operational Plan, Services Performance and Financial Review Summary.

 

Financial Position Summary

 

The December quarter has continued to show that Council’s short term financial position remains sound, and the recent improvements in the residential property market and a strong focus on controlling costs have combined to provide a cumulative surplus budget result for the six months to 31 December 2011 of $606,741.  This has most notably been achieved through additional rates income ($357,847) and development related income ($310,000). This result has also provided for the allocation of funds to the Legal Services budget ($120,000) to ensure that Council has the capacity to respond to any emerging issues following a number of significant matters remaining ongoing, and an investment in further productivity initiatives ($44,000).  Net salary savings of $277,059 have been identified and it is considered prudent that these salary savings be retained within the employee costs budget at this stage and not reallocated.  Council confirmed its commitment to ensuring that sufficient provision is made for Employee Leave Entitlements (ELE) during the 2010-11 June Quarter and Year End Review when it endorsed the transfer of net salary savings to the ELE Reserve for 2011-12. 

 

The 2011-12 Operational Plan identified budget adjustments that were retained in the Asset Reserve to ensure that any movement in assumptions or emerging priorities could be accommodated. This review proposes the allocation of funding from the Asset Reserve to two new High Priority Projects, to Wi fi enable the Civic Centre ($52,441) and implement a new Customer Management System and upgrade Access Control at Penrith Swimming Centre ($76,365). It is however considered prudent that the allocation of the reported surplus ($606,741) and the remainder of the Asset Reserve ($263,672) be delayed until a further reassessment of Council’s priorities has been completed, including consultation with Councillors at the upcoming Operational Plan Workshops.

 

There are no revotes proposed as a result of the December Quarter Review.  Further details on proposed major variations are provided later in this report and in Attachment 1 – 2011-12 Operational Plan, Services Performance and Financial Review Summary.

 

This report recommends that the revised budget estimates identified in the report and detailed in Attachment 1 – 2011-12 Operational Plan, Services Performance and Financial Review Summary be adopted.

 


How is Progress Measured?

 

Progress for both the Delivery Program and Operational Plan is expressed through the use of actual results versus target expressed as percentages and ‘traffic light’ indicators.  The rating scales and parameters for each ‘traffic light’ are explained below.

 

Table 1: Guidelines for ‘Traffic Light’ Status Indicators

*

[Green]

On Target

90% +

A service activity, task, project, budget, program indicator or KPI is within 10% of targeted performance for that YTD period.

*

[Amber]

Attention Required

75% - 89%

A service activity, task, project, budget, program indicator or KPI is within 10% - 25% of targeted performance.  It is at risk of non-completion, and may be the subject of a proposed carry over or partial revote of works.  A comment is required about the issue, the focus required, and what will be done to address it.

[Red]

At Risk

< 75%

A service activity, task, project, budget, program indicator or KPI is more than 25% off its targeted performance and/or is the subject of a proposed revote of works.  A comment is required about the issue, the focus required, and what will be done to address it.

 C

100%

Completed (usually applies to Capital & Operating Projects and Tasks with defined target dates).  Represents 100% completion.

 

Section 1: December Quarter Review - 2011-12 Operational Plan

The Operational Plan progress report for the period ending 31 December 2011 is the second quarterly review of Council’s 2011-12 Operational Plan, which in turn contributes to the achievement of Council’s Delivery Program 2009-2013.

 

Each quarter, all Managers are required to report progress on each of their services, based on service activities, service budgets, tasks, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), capital and operating projects as set out in the adopted 2011-12 Operational Plan.  The results for the December Quarter Review are as follows:

 

1.      Overall Services Performance Summary

Council’s Performance Planning System indicates that the combined effort of all services for the three month period ending 31 December 2011 has resulted in a 51.3% achievement of the yearly requirement as required under the adopted 2011-12 Operational Plan.

 

This result is encouraging demonstrating that services performance was 1.3% above the target of 50% at this stage of the year.  The contributing factors to this result are summarised in the table below.

 


Table 3: Service Performance Summary

 

SERVICE PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

Completed

GREEN

(On Target)

AMBER

(Attention Required)

RED

(At Risk)

Totals

SERVICES OVERALL (excluding Controlled Entities)

 

44

(100%)

-

-

44

 

·     Tasks

7

(5%)

150

(94%)

2

(1%)

-

 

159

·     Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

 

95

(94%)

5

(5%)

1

(1%)

101

·     Capital Projects

38

(31%)

82

(68%)

-

 

1

(1%)

121

·     Operating Projects

14

(14%)

86

(84%)

2

(2%)

-

102

Totals

59

411

9

2

483

 

Analysis of Results

 

Table 3 shows that the 44 Council services performed well and were “On Target” as at 31 December 2011.  This result is was due to:

·        99% of Tasks Completed or On Target

·        94% of KPIs were On Target

·        99% of Capital Projects were Completed or On Target, and

·        98% of Operating Projects were Completed or On Target.

It is generally the case that for the second quarter in any Operational Plan year that most reporting elements would normally be “on track” especially given that a large number of projects are phased for completion in the remaining half of the year.

 

2.      Completed Task and Projects

A positive result coming from Table 3 is the identification of 27 tasks and projects that were completed within the quarter.  Some of the key projects and tasks are listed below:

 

Table 4: Completed Key Tasks and Projects for the December Quarter 2011

Key Tasks and Projects Completed

Commentary

Ainsbury Road Channel Rehabilitation (St Marys)

Bank rehabilitation, scour protection and associated revegetation works near Ainsbury Road, St Marys were completed in the quarter including the additional planting works. Stormwater discharge was previously eroding the site which is in the riparian zone of South Creek. The project was funded through Council’s Enhanced Environmental Program.

 

Blair Oval Athletics Improvements

A concrete base for the long jump run up has been installed with a synthetic surface being laid on top. The long jump pits have been extended and the installation of the judges stands have been completed.

Ched Towns Soccer Field Floodlighting

$107,000 worth of new floodlighting was installed providing 100 lux lighting for the southern fields at Ched Towns Reserve. These lights will be used extensively during the 2012 winter season.

Children's Services Shade Audits and Compliance Work

This project relates to an audit of all shade structures in the outdoor play environment across all Children's Services sites to ensure they meet compliance with sun protection for staff and children. All audits and rectification work has now been completed which included tree planting and the replacement of some shade coverings.

Children’s Services PC Access and Equity

Each service now has a computer which is accessible for all staff. Centre staff have also now been trained in the use of the Employee Self Service system which enables them to check leave balances, make leave applications and access their payroll details.

Children’s Services Playground Upgrades

Playground upgrades at Jamisontown and Kindana Children's Centres were completed this quarter. Work included a new deck, general maintenance and sandpit top up. These upgrades ensure that the playground areas continue to be safe environments for children and staff.

Howell Oval Electronics Scoreboard

A new electronic scoreboard has been installed at Howell Oval and is being utilised by Penrith District Grade Cricket Club.

Tandara Children’s Centre Disability Access

Tandara Children's Centre which received State Government funding to upgrade the outdoor area to make it more inclusive for children with ongoing high support needs, especially children in wheelchairs. The upgrades, which were completed in the December quarter, included the provision of softfall, an accessible path and an amphitheatre.

Northern Rural Community Development Project

The Northern Rural Areas Community Development Project is a NSW Government Community Builders funded project and was completed this quarter. This program has facilitated the TAFE outreach course conducted by the Richmond College focussing on Communication and Leadership skills and was completed by 10 residents. The group displayed increased self confidence and proficiency in communication during group discussions. Throughout the course participants have had the opportunity to research and explore current issues relevant to Northern Rural Areas residents and the wider community. The group have also advanced plans to have TAFE outreach conduct a social media course at Berkshire Park Hall in 2012, a further demonstration of their skills and knowledge they have acquired. The inaugural Berkshire Park Carols by Candlelight event was held on 2 December 2011. Council worked in partnership with the Berkshire Park, Llandilo and Shanes Park Residents Action Group on the successful event which attracted over 200 people. Highlights included a performance by the Llandilo Public School Choir and a visit from Santa. As well as being a great event inclusive of the wider community the planning of the event was an opportunity for capacity building and skills development of the action group members who were able to work together to organise a large scale event.

The final Berkshire Park, Llandilo and Shanes Park newsletter has been produced. There has also been interest from the community in continuing the newsletter beyond the end of the project.

Parking Management – Supporting the Local Businesses

Four temporary car parks were provided during the December quarter to assist with the peak demand generated by the Christmas trading period at Woodriff Gardens (128 spaces), Judges Place (55 spaces), corner of Derby/Woodriff Street (50 spaces) and Civic Centre car park (47 spaces). Council staff continue to investigate additional temporary car parking opportunities in the CBD in concert with permanent long term solutions.

Regentville Hall - Kitchen Upgrade

This project is funded by the State Government Ageing Disability and Home Care agency. Following consultations with user groups on the final designs for the refurbishment, renovations and upgrade to the kitchen facilities in the Regentville Hall were completed on time. A double glass door refrigerator has been installed in the kitchen and user groups have indicated their satisfaction with the new facilities. The new kitchen will also enable Nepean Food Services, the local meals on wheels provider, to enhance their centre-based meals service for local seniors at Regentville Hall.

RID Squad ICT Improvements

During the quarter new equipment including radios and "tablet" computers were purchased and deployed for use by RID Squad staff. These mobility tools have improved the efficiency and effectiveness of RID operations including incident reporting and improving customer response times.

Road Reconstruction completed

Road reconstruction works completed during the quarter included:

·      Banks Drive between Timesweep Drive and Blackwell Drive (0.6 km or 7,400 sqm - $271,300) St Clair

·      Russell Street between Water Street and Kite Street (0.5km or 5,400sqm - $434,360) Emu Plains and

·        Garswood Road between Bija Drive and Surveyors Creek Road (0.52km or 4,400sqm - $270,600) Glenmore Park

St Marys Senior Citizens Centre Refurbishments

This grant funded project included the refurbishment of existing toilets, installation of a new accessible toilet, installation of an electronic automatic opener for the main entry door and the installation of new flooring in the common areas. All of these improvements will help to improve the utilisation of the facility.

Werrington Walking Trail - Werrington Park

Pathway constructed and minor landscaping work completed providing an accessible walking path for the public.

WSAAS Domestic Violence Resource Project

The Western Sydney Area Assistance Scheme funded Domestic Violence Resource Project was completed in the December Quarter. An afternoon tea was held at Council on 30 November to officially thank the staff and trainers involved in the project and to launch the Domestic Violence Resource Kit. The Resource Kit was developed as part of the project and aims to provide community workers with a consistent referral process for clients dealing with domestic and family violence issues. The kit is currently being delivered to local services and groups who attended the training sessions. The project was highly successful, delivering 16 training sessions to 398 participants, with positive feedback received from those involved.

 

 


3.     Exception Reporting

A total of 11 Tasks, KPIs and Projects in 9 services were identified in the Services Performance Summary (Table 3) as being an ‘Amber Traffic Light ‘requiring attention’ or a ‘RedTraffic Light ‘at risk of not being delivered or ‘not achieved this quarter’.  A complete listing, sorted by individual service, is provided in Table 5 below with commentary/remedial action also provided.

 

Table 5: Services Exception Report for the December Quarter 2011

Traffic

Light

Measure

Result

Target

Comment / Remedial Action

Building Maintenance & Construction

AMBER

(Attention required)

Operating Project:

Water & Energy Management Plans.

5%

50%

Funding is proposed to be returned to sustainability revolving fund.  A revised Energy Savings Action Plan is currently under development and this program will continue to implement the Plan in 2012-13 once completed. In addition it is recognised that many sustainability initiatives are now integrated into building upgrades and funded accordingly.

Children’s Services

AMBER

(Attention Required)

KPI:

More than  87% utilisation of After School Care Programs

74%

87%

Service delivery continues to be negatively impacted by the increased number of after school care programs being opened across the city particularly by the private school sector. Of Council’s nine after school care services, Erskine Park and Kindana in St Clair are showing minimal effects. Remedial action has been taken in the other seven services with rectification strategies including reducing operational costs (e.g. food and program costs) and reducing staffing expenditure being put in place. (All staff impacted have been able to be accommodated in other services without loss of hours). This situation will continue to be closely monitored and reported to the Board so that informed decisions can be made about the way forward for this service type.

 

City Parks

RED

(At Risk)

Capital Project:

Construction of New Playing Field at Roper Road, Colyton

10%

50%

This project will not proceed in the short term due to the identified costs associated in the remediation of contamination present in the soil on the site. This matter was reported to Council on 12 December 2011 and it was determined that the grant funding be redirected to Ridge Park and Shepherd Street Park.  The NSW Dept of Sport and Recreation (NSWDSR) & the Federal Government’s Regional and Local Facility Infrastructure Program (RLFIP) have been approached to amend the grant locations.  Pending this approval Council allocated $100,000 from the Telecommunication Access Fees Reserve as matching funds. Further investigations will be undertaken into the responsibility and liability for the management of site contamination on DoP land within the terms and conditions under which Council assumed care, control and management of this site, with the outcome of these investigations to be the subject of a further report to Council.

Design & Project Management

RED

(At Risk)

Capital Project:

WELL Infrastructure Fund

20%

50%

Designs have been completed for the selected roads, however, construction has been put on hold pending resolution of the DoP cap on S94 contributions. The designs for O'Connell Lane, have been provided to Landcom who will carry out construction for part of that road.

 

 

 

 

Floodplain & Drainage Management

AMBER

(Attention Required)

Task:

Complete the Nepean River and South Creek flood studies and revise Council's Flood Policy

30%

50%

The Nepean River Flood Study and investigations are progressing, however the finalisation of the study has been delayed pending confirmation of the future of the PLDC lands. Analysis to date has been based on anticipated land forms that dates back to 2004, and confirmation of the contemporary planning for the lakes scheme is required to inform the finalisation of the Nepean River flood study. Council is seeking urgent meetings with PLDC and the relevant government agencies. In relation to South Creek, the floodway analysis is almost complete and the floodway definitions are now being finalised. It is anticipated that the findings of the South Creek analysis will be presented to Council mid 2012.

 

Libraries

AMBER

(Attention Required)

KPI:

More than 6,400 new library members each year

2,426

3,200

This KPI is slightly lower than last year. To increase the number of new library members, a promotional membership drive is planned as part of the Federal Government's "National Year of Reading" initiative in 2012. This KPI was previously reported in the September Quarter Review

 

AMBER

(Attention Required)

KPI:

More than 900,000 loans [Circulation] each year

387,810

450,000

Circulations are slightly below target for this quarter and will be monitored over the coming months.

AMBER

(Attention Required)

KPI:

More than 650,000 visitors to Penrith City Libraries each year

275,330

325,000

Results are 15% below target for this quarter.

These statistics are based on State Library of NSW quarterly survey and highlight the dramatic increase in reference based searches through the internet at home versus the use of the electronic resources at libraries. Programs are in place to promote visits to the library. A review of the indicators is being undertaken to include on-line visits with personal visits. This KPI was previously reported in the September Quarter Review.

Purchasing & Supply

AMBER

(Attention Required)

KPI:

Council's annual inventory turnover ratio for the main store will be greater than 3:1

2:1

3:1

A review of current stock holdings and activity has begun as part of a more comprehensive service review. This KPI was previously reported in the September Quarter Review.

Strategic Planning

AMBER

(Attention Required)

Task:

Consolidate Council's adopted strategies, relating to the City's people and places, into a new City Planning Strategy

10%

50%

Allocation of resources to organisational priorities including the review of the City Indicators Framework, the 2 Year Delivery Program Review, and application and the city-wide LEP has resulted in minimal progression of the Penrith Planning Strategy.

Priorities for the next 6-18 months involve the review and wrap-up of the current Community Strategic Plan and community engagement and development of Council’s next suite of strategic planning documents.

Given this workload it is unlikely that in the foreseeable future resources will become available to commence consolidating Council's adopted strategies and implementing a new City Planning Strategy. The delay in this project is not impacting on the completion of any other projects. This task was previously reported in the September Quarter Review

Traffic Management, Parking & Road Safety

AMBER

(Attention Required)

Operating Project:

CBD Traffic Studies (EEP)

45%

50%

Following a detailed review of growth assumptions and projections for the Penrith City Centre, the detailed traffic modelling and analysis has progressed. It is anticipated that this modelling will be complete by mid 2012. This analysis will provide a comprehensive review of traffic movements into the future and facilitate the strategic planning and implementation of key transport infrastructure and services.

 

Analysis of St Marys CBD has been deferred pending confirmation of the growth assumptions and associated transport implications. Whilst we are not in a position at this time to undertake the study, it is critical that it is progressed as soon as possible. The funding that was available for St Marys has been redirected into a comprehensive review of the on-street parking provisions within the Penrith City Centre.

 

Progress for each of the exceptions listed above will continue to be monitored and remedial action taken to return these to a “Green” traffic light “On Target” status where possible.


Section 2: Financial Position for the December Quarter

The financial position of Council for the quarter is expressed by providing information, in compliance with Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS) requirements, on:

·        Budget Position (whether balanced/surplus/deficit)

·        Significant Variations

·        Identified Revotes

·        Funding Summary

·        Reserve Movements for the quarter, and

·        the Capital and Operating Budget Projects list for the quarter

·        Key Performance Indicators

·        Income & Expenses

·        Income & Expenses by Program

·        Capital Budget

·        Cash & Investments

·        Contracts and Other Expenses

·        Consultancy and Legal Expenses

 

Budget Position

 

 

$000s

Original Budget Position

0

 

 

September Quarter Variations        

27.6

December Quarter Variations

0

December Review Variations

579.1

Revised Surplus/(Deficit)

     606.7

 

 

 

The predicted cumulative result for the year as at December is a surplus of $606,741 after the recommended variations for the quarter. Commentary is provided below on some of the more significant issues in the review with further details together with all proposed minor variations, and reserve movements detailed in Attachment 1 – 2011-12 Operational Plan, Services Performance and Financial Review Summary.

 

Net Rates Income - $348,708 F (0.4%)

Estimated annual rating income is affected by development throughout the city (i.e. subdivisions) and is based on the rating data available at a particular point of time. In the September 2011 Quarterly Review an increase in rates income of $870,123 was included in the annual budget.  This increase in rating income was largely the result of two large releases of land that occurred at Glenmore Park Stage 2 and Jordan Springs. 

These developments have continued to generate further rates income with an additional $357,847 (0.4%) now proposed to be included in the annual budget.  Once again, it is important to note that this income was predicted to be received in future years in Council’s Long Term Financial Plan and as such does not provide any additional financial capacity in future years. This additional income, in conjunction with reduced Valuation Fees ($35,011 – 11%), has been partly offset by an increase in estimated printing and postage costs ($44,150 – 26%).

 

Salary Savings - $277,059 F (0.4%)

During the second quarter of 2011-12 salary savings have been realised primarily due to vacancies across a number of departments.  The majority of these vacant positions are in the process of being filled.  It is recommended that some of the identified salary savings are retained in the individual departments to enable the engagement of consultants or temporary staff to ensure the delivery of key Operational Plan tasks and projects.  The salary savings, net of those being retained by departments, total $277,059.

 

It is proposed as part of the December Review that the net salary savings of $277,059 identified are retained within the employee costs area to assist with year-end employee cost balancing and to supplement the budget for retirements and resignations. As outlined above Council is committed to ensuring sufficient provision is made for Employee Leave Entitlements (ELE) and in keeping with that commitment any remaining salary savings, once current year payments have been provided for, will be transferred to the ELE Reserve in future reviews.

 

Engineering Services – Construction and Compliance Certificates Income $275,000 F (79%)

An increased number of Construction and Compliance Certificates are being processed, compared to the original estimates.  This follows favourable economic conditions that have stimulated growth in this area, resulting in an increase in residential subdivision activity. This increase is primarily the result of Council being appointed as the Certifying Authority for several large developments in Jordan Springs, North Penrith, Caddens Road, and Glenmore Park. An increase of $275,000 has been projected in the December Review to account for what has been received to date and what is expected to be received for the remainder of the year.

 

City Works – Development Related Income $102,398 F (35%)

Income areas relating to development have been in advance of the projected budget for the first half of the year, again following the favourable economic conditions, and an increase in income for the remainder of the year is proposed for Driveway Inspections, Road Opening for service connections, and Development Application Infrastructure Inspection and Administration fees. This increase in development related income has been partly offset by the engagement of an Infrastructure Bond Officer (discussed below) to cater for increase workload. The development related income budgets will also be increased for the next financial year as the trend is expected to continue.

 


Infrastructure Bond Employee Costs - $67,600 U (4%)

A new position has been established to cater for the increased Infrastructure Inspection and Administration service and is to be funded from increased income proposed in this Review (discussed above).

 

Contribution to Emergency Services Management - $82,210 F (5%)

Emergency Management NSW collects contributions on behalf of the NSW Fire Brigades, the NSW Rural Fire Services and the State Emergency Service under the provisions of the Fire Brigades Act 1989, the Rural Fires Act 1997 and the State Emergency Service Act 1989.  These budget adjustments reflect the annual assessment notice for 2011-12 which has now been received with all councils required to pay 11.7% of the Service’s estimated expenditure in their Local Government Area.

 

Legal Expenses - $120,000 U (22%)

This additional allocation has been provided to ensure that Council has the capacity to respond to current and emerging matters in the remaining six months of the year. This follows a number of significant matters, where the scope has been greater than originally anticipated, being litigated in the current year, including a number of appeals that were not original predicted.

 

Other variations with no impact on Available Funds and Proposed Revotes

A number of other variations are proposed as part of this review that do not have an impact on the available funds.  Details of these adjustments are provided in Attachment 1 – 2011-12 Operational Plan, Service Performance and Financial Review Summary.  There are no revotes identified in the December Quarter Review and therefore the total value of revotes for the year to date remains at $15,000 compared to $370,467 for the same period last year.

 

Conclusion

The 2011-12 Operational Plan December Quarter review indicates that the performance of Council Services is ‘on track’ to meet Council’s challenging annual program. Strong Financial Management and improvements in the residential property market have contributed to a surplus of $606,741 being projected to June 2012.

 

The review documents have been placed on Council’s website, and will also be available to the public in hard copy and CD versions on request.  The opportunity is available for Council tonight to seek clarification or elaboration on particular matters in any section of this report, or the enclosed Services Performance and Financial Review Summary Report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on 2011-12 Operational Plan - December Quarter Review be received

2.     The 2011-12 Operational Plan Review as at 31 December 2011, including the revised estimates and revotes identified in the recommended budget outlined in this report and detailed in Attachment 1 – 2011-12 Operational Plan, Services Performance and Financial Review Summary be adopted.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

2011-12 Operational Plan - Services Performance and Financial Review Summary progress to 31 December 2011

58 Pages

Attachment

  


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A Leading City

 

 

3

2012 Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) National General Assembly of Local Government   

 

Compiled by:               Adam Beggs, Governance Officer

Authorised by:            Glenn Schuil, Senior Governance Officer   

 

Objective

We demonstrate accountability, transparency and ethical conduct

Community Outcome

A Council that behaves responsibly and ethically (5)

Strategic Response

Champion accountability and transparency, and responsible and ethical behaviour (5.1)

       

Executive Summary

The 2012 Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) National General Assembly of Local Government will be held in Canberra from 17-20 June 2012.

 

Penrith City Council is entitled to have one voting delegate at each plenary session and it is Council’s practice to send additional Councillors as observers to the Assembly.

 

Presentations will be given at the Assembly from key political leaders.

 

Council should nominate its voting delegate to attend the Assembly as well as observers, and grant leave of absence as appropriate.

 

Motions for the Assembly under three themes (Infrastructure, Planning and Services) need to be submitted to the ALGA by no later than Friday 27 April 2012. It is recommended that a further report detailing suggested motions be considered at Council’s Policy Review Committee meeting to be held on 16 April 2012.

Background

The 2012 National General Assembly of Local Government will be held in Canberra from 17–20 June 2012.

 

The National General Assembly, which is sponsored by the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA), will have as its theme, “National Voice, Local Choice – Infrastructure, Planning, Services”.

 

At this stage a draft program with speakers has not been prepared, Councillors will be advised of the program and speakers when a report is considered on the draft motions at Council’s Policy Review Committee meeting to be held on 16 April 2012.

 

Delegates

Each Council is entitled to have one voting delegate at each plenary session.

In the past, in addition to selecting its voting delegate, Council has elected to send additional Councillors as observers.

 

In 2011, Council’s voting delegate to the National General Assembly was Councillor Jim Aitken OAM, and the additional observers were Councillors Ross Fowler OAM, Marko Malkoc, Jackie Greenow and Karen McKeown.

 

Submitting Motions

To enhance the quality of outcomes from this year’s National General Assembly, and to ensure that motions are relevant to local government nationally, the ALGA Board is calling for motions on the three core themes of the 2012 Assembly, namely:

·      Infrastructure

·      Planning

·      Services

 

The aim is to stimulate ideas about new ways of doing business to meet the infrastructure and service needs of local people in their local communities. Motions for the Assembly need to outline credible ideas and policy initiatives that will strengthen local government’s capacity to respond to the social, economic and environmental challenges facing Australia.

 

To be eligible for inclusion in the National General Assembly Business Papers motions must:

1.   Fall under one of these themes – Infrastructure, Planning, Services;

2.   Be relevant to the work of local government nationally; and

3.   Complement or build on the policy objectives of state or territory associations.

 

Motions that are carried by the National General Assembly become Resolutions. These Resolutions are then considered by the ALGA Board when setting national local government policy and will also feed into the Australian Council of Local Government processes.

 

Motions need to be submitted to the ALGA by no later than Friday 27 April 2012.

 

It is proposed to report on the draft Motions to the Policy Review Committee on 16 April 2012.

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on 2012 Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) National General Assembly of Local Government be received

2.     Council nominate its voting delegate for the 2012 National General Assembly of Local Government.

3.     Council nominate those Councillors that will attend as observers at the 2012 National General Assembly of Local Government.

4.     Leave of Absence be granted to all Councillors attending the 2012 National General Assembly of Local Government to be held in Canberra from 17-20 June 2012.

5.     A further report detailing suggested motions be considered at Council’s Policy Review Committee meeting to be held on 16 April 2012. 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A Leading City

 

 

4

Summary of Investments for the period 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012   

 

Compiled by:               Pauline Johnston, Expenditure Accountant

Authorised by:            Andrew Moore, Financial Services Manager   

 

Objective

We demonstrate accountability, transparency and ethical conduct

Community Outcome

A Council that manages its finances, services and assets effectively (4)

Strategic Response

Deliver services for the City and its communities, and maintain our long term financial sustainability (4.1)

       

 

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of investments for the period 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012 and a reconciliation of invested funds at 31 January 2012.

The report recommends that the information contained in the report be received.

Background

CERTIFICATE OF RESPONSIBLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER

I hereby certify the following:

 

1.   All investments have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, relevant regulations and Council’s Investment Policy.

2.   Council’s Cash Book and Bank Statements have been reconciled as at 31 January 2012.

 

 

Vicki O’Kelly

Responsible Accounting Officer

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Summary of Investments for the period 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012 be received

2.     The Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer and Summaries of Investments and Performance for the period 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2012 be noted and accepted.

3.     The graphical investment analysis as at 31 January 2012 be noted.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1.  

Summary of Investments - January 2012

4 Pages

Appendix

  


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                            20 February 2012

Appendix 1 - Summary of Investments - January 2012

 

temp


temp


temp


temp

 


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


A City of Opportunities

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

5        Development Application DA11/1034 existing masonry outbuilding, front boundary fence and entrance gate at Lot 816 DP 1068323 (No. 174 - 186) Capitol Hill Drive, Mount Vernon Applicant: Patrick Hurley;  Owner: Cornelius D Cipri & Catrina Stylianou

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A City of Opportunities

 

 

5

Development Application DA11/1034 existing masonry outbuilding, front boundary fence and entrance gate at Lot 816 DP 1068323 (No. 174 - 186) Capitol Hill Drive, Mount Vernon  Applicant:  Patrick Hurley;  Owner:  Cornelius D Cipri & Catrina Stylianou   

 

Compiled by:               Christopher Hawkins, Environmental Health & Building Surveyor

Authorised by:            Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager  

 

Objective

We have access to what we need

Community Outcome

A City with lifestyle and housing choice in our neighbourhoods (8)

Strategic Response

Encourage housing that provides choice, achieves design excellence, and meets community needs (8.1)

      

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

Executive Summary

Council approved subdivision application DA 01/2345 for the creation of seventeen (17) new allotments for rural residential purposes in Belleview Ave Mt Vernon in June 2004.  As part of that approval, restrictive covenants under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 were imposed.

 

The restriction on the use of land, fourthly referred to in the subject deposited plan, states in section (b):

 

“all development erected on the subject lots will be in accordance with the ‘Siting Plan including Landscape Plan’ as indicated on the Plan Reference Pittenridge Shinkfield Bruce numbered LO1E and dated 20th November 2002. The plan is held by Penrith City Council.”

 

Penrith City Council is nominated as the authority whose consent is required to release, vary or modify, the terms of the restriction.

 

The Siting Plan referred to in the restrictive covenant, nominates individual building envelopes for each site. It was applied to the subdivision to maintain separation between buildings, and provide for preservation of established landscaping to the perimeters of the allotments (See Siting Plan in Appendix No. 2).

 

The applicant has requested the above restriction be varied, permitting an existing masonry building to be approved outside the building envelope designated for the lot. The lot is traversed by an electrical easement which greatly reduces the available location for ancillary structures to the dwelling. The existing structure complies with the setback requirements of the DCP and is envisaged to have minimal impacts on the streetscape and amenity of the area.

Site and Surrounds

The subject site is a 1ha allotment situated in the semi-rural locality of Capitol Hill at Mount Vernon. The surrounding area is characterised by rural/residential development in a parkland type setting.

 

The lot is irregular in shape with a frontage to Capitol Hill Drive of approximately 160m and varying depths ranging from 61.7m to 123.3m. The site has a gentle slope to the street (west). The site is constrained by an electrical easement approximately 60m in width that diagonally traverses the lot from south-east to north-west. Existing landscaping is located along the front boundary, the remainder of the site is clear of vegetation.

History of existing development

The suitability of the shed structure was raised in a previous development application (DA10/1228) for a two storey dwelling, shed and septic tank. At that stage the shed structure had been partially built but encroached on the easement for transmission. The application for the dwelling was approved with the shed structure being deleted from the application due to the encroachment on the electricity easement.

 

Proposal

The current application seeks approval for the partially constructed shed. The proposal will partially demolish the building to remove sections that encroach upon the easement for transmission. The proposal also seeks approval for a new front boundary fence and entrance gates. The existing masonry building will be reduced in size from 121m² to 79.93m² with an overall height of 3.51m (refer Appendix No. 3). The existing timber rail fence along the Capitol Hill Drive boundary is proposed to be replaced with 1.8m high palisade style fence, masonry rendered and painted support columns with sandstone capping. The entrance gates will be of a similar style with a sliding gate setback off the front boundary. A separate 4.5m wide gate is also proposed to allow access by Transgrid to the easement and the tower situated on site (refer Appendix No. 3).

Assessment of Issues Relating to Positive Covenant

The existing building envelope for the lot is located in the north eastern corner of the lot and is a triangle shape. This is due to the transmission easement which bisects the lot from south-east to north-west. The current location of the structure is in the south of the lot (refer Appendix No. 2).

 

The following table contains an outline of Councils setback requirements under DCP 2010 and the setbacks of the existing masonry outbuilding.

 

DCP Setback Requirements  

Existing Masonry Outbuilding

Setback of structures adjoining lot (South)

Front setback 15m

Front setback 27.9m

Front setback 19m

Rear setback 10m

Rear setback 28m (approx)

Rear setback 50m

Side setback 5m

Side setback 23.7m

Side setback 30m

 

The table demonstrates that the existing structure complies with the minimum setback requirements under the DCP. As can be seen in Appendix No. 2 the transmission easement has greatly affected the subject lot restricting possible locations for ancillary structures to the dwelling. The available area on site for buildings is dictated by the electricity easement and in this respect the owners have a preference to retain the eastern area of the site for the main residence and surrounding landscaped gardens.

 

The purpose of the setback and building envelope requirements was to create and maintain a streetscape character conducive to the rural setting, to allow for variety of setbacks and open space around the dwelling and to provide scope for comprehensive landscaping of developments. The existing masonry outbuilding has similar setbacks to the dwelling located to the south thus maintaining the streetscape and character of Capitol Hill Drive.

 

The setbacks of the masonry building are greater than those of the adjacent dwelling to the south. The lot to the south did not form part of the subdivision thus the dwelling did not have to be built within a building envelope. The setbacks of the masonry building are greater than those of the established dwelling to the south maintaining building separation and preserving landscaping which the restrictive covenant seeks to enforce.

 

The location of an outbuilding outside of the building envelope is not considered unreasonable as it keeps similar setbacks with development on adjoining lots and maintains building separation and existing landscaping. Due to the above issues, and the nature of the variation requested, it is considered that a variation of the building envelope, as proposed, would have minimal impacts visually or on the amenity or streetscape of the locality.

Assessment of Development Application

Planning Assessment

The development has been assessed in accordance with the matters for consideration, under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and having regard to those matters, the following issues have been identified for further consideration.

1.   Section 79C(1)(a)(i) – Any Environmental Planning Instrument

Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury Nepean River (SREP 20)

The provisions of SREP 20 apply to the property. SREP 20 aims to protect the environment of the Hawkesbury-Nepean River by ensuring that the impacts of future land uses are considered in a regional context. Of most relevance to the proposal is the potential impact on water quality.

 

The compliance of the proposal with the general planning considerations, specific planning policies, and recommended strategies specified in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of Part 2 of SREP 20, has been assessed, and it is considered that the development application for the construction of a dwelling and outbuildings and the installation of the proposed On Site Sewerage Management System meets these requirements.

 

Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010

The land is zoned E4 Environmental Living under the Penrith LEP 2010. The aims and objectives of the Penrith LEP 2010 and objectives of the E4 Environmental Living zone are contained in Appendix No. 4.

 

The building is considered to be a structure that is ordinarily ancillary to an approved ‘dwelling house.’ The proposed use of the shed is for storage of lawn care machinery, car trailer and power tools. Subclause 2.3(2) of the Penrith LEP 2010 provides that Council must have regard to the objectives for development in a zone when determining a development application in respect of land within the zone.

 

The proposed works are considered to be consistent with the aims and relevant objectives and are not contrary to achieving the objectives of the zone for the following reasons:

·    It relates to construction of a masonry outbuilding in association with an approved dwelling which is appropriately located;

·    It represents development that is compatible with the character of the locality, and

·    The assessment of the proposal has considered adjoining land uses and the natural environment.

 

Table 2 Appendix No. 4 provides an assessment of the proposal against the relevant Part 4 Principle Development Standards; Part 5 Miscellaneous provisions; and Part 6 Additional Local Provisions of Penrith LEP 2010. The proposal is consistent with these special provisions.

2.   Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) – Any Development Control Plan (DCP)

Penrith DCP 2010 aims to provides an opportunity for Council to fulfil its’ commitment to sustainability and creation of a Sustainable Penrith. Appendix No. 4 shows the relevant standards and how the outbuilding satisfies the requirements of Penrith DCP 2010.

3.   Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of the Development

The proposed development would be likely to have minimal impacts in terms of access, traffic, public domain, utilities, heritage, or the use of agricultural land.

 

·    The development has been designed to be responsive to the site. Site disturbance/excavation and filling are minimized.

 

·    No vegetation removal is proposed. Additional landscaping will be provided adjacent to the front boundary.

 

·    The proposal will have minimal impact on the local road system as the building will be used for storage.

 

·    Effluent Disposal – the masonry building will be connected to the septic system approved with the dwelling under DA10/1228.

 

·    The proposed development will have minimal impact on the amenity of the area and is in keeping with the surrounding and adjacent land uses.

·    The proposal will have no adverse social or economic impacts in the locality

·    The development is not subject to bushfire risk or flooding

4.   Section 79C(1)(c) – The Suitability of the Site for the Development

 

The proposed development fits the locality. Adequate separation is provided between developments on adjoining properties. 

 

Adequate services are available to the site. On site disposal of effluent has been approved for the approved dwelling on site. The toilet will be connected to this system.

 

The site is not nominated as bushfire prone. It is not subject to flooding, contamination or slip. The site attributes are conducive to the proposal.

5.   Section 79C(1)(d) – Any Submissions made in relation to the Development

Community Consultation

In accordance with Council’s Advertising and Notification Development Control Plan, the proposed development was notified to the adjoining property owners. No submissions were received in response.

Conclusion

Assessment of the application for the masonry outbuilding including variation to the 88B Instrument applying to the property demonstrates that it is generally in accordance with LEP and DCP requirements.

 

Assessment of the application to vary the terms of Restrictive Covenant, fourthly referred to in the 88B Instrument attached to Lot 816, DP 1068323, has demonstrated that the proposal is unlikely to have any significant impacts on the achievement of the outcomes intended by the planning and subdivision controls for this property.

 

The proposed variation will not compromise the character or amenity of the locality, and will not cause a significant reduction in the spatial separation, and perceived setbacks of development on the streetscape.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Development Application DA11/1034 existing masonry outbuilding, front boundary fence and entrance gate at Lot 816 DP 1068323 (No. 174 - 186) Capitol Hill Drive, Mount Vernon be received

2.     That DA11/1034 for Masonry Outbuilding Front Boundary Fence and Entrance Gate Masonry Outbuilding Front Boundary Fence and Entrance Gate at 174-186 Capitol Hill Drive MOUNT VERNON  NSW  2178, be approved subject to the attached conditions (Development Assessment Report Part B)

3.     Standard Conditions

3.1       A008 – Works to BCA requirements

A009 – Residential Works DCP

A019 – Occupation Certificate

A020 – Use of Building

D001 – Sedimentation and Erosion Controls

D009 – Covering Waste Storage area

E001 – BCA compliance

F010 – Septic distance from house

H001 – Stamped plans and erection of site notice

H041 – Hours of work

K017 – Stormwater and sewerage plan

L008 – Tree preservation order

Q01F – Notice of commencement and appointment of PCA2

Special Conditions

3.2      The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the plans drawn by Mira Husar Design and Drafting Services Drawing Number A-01 to A-06, dated July 2011, the application form and any supporting information received with the application, except as may be amended in red on the attached plans and by the following conditions

 

3.3     All boundary fences are to be low profile, open style and rural in character. The front fence is not to exceed 1.8m in height

 

3.4     You are required to submit a construction certificate for the yet to be constructed portion. An engineer’s certificate is to form part of the application attesting to the structural adequacy of the existing building.  Note: This relates to the portion of the building yet to be constructed

 

3.5     Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate for the development, the variation of the Restriction on the Use of land numbered 4(b) in DP 1068323, shall be registered with the Land and Property Information division of the Department of Lands

 

The variation to the covenant shall be in the terms approved by resolution of Penrith City Council. The plan attached to the documentation shall indicate that an additional building envelope is to be provided which represents the footprint of the outbuilding approved by this development

 

3.6     All house sewer and plumbing work shall be carried out in accordance with Sydney Water's requirements or the Local Government (Water, Sewerage and Drainage) Regulation 1993

a)       Penrith City Council is both the consent authority and certifying authority for the installation of the On Site Sewage Management System (OSSM), otherwise known as a septic tank system. It is your responsibility to contact Council's Building Approvals and Environment Protection Department to organise all inspections required for the installation of the system. In this regard, the following will require inspection:

·     All internal and external drainage lines and septic tanks before they are backfilled/covered

·     On completion of the system's installation and prior to its commissioning, ensuring compliance with those conditions specific to the installation of the system

 

A copy of the satisfactory inspection reports carried out by Council shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority if Council is not the Principal Certifying Authority

 

i.        The septic tank and drainage lines shall not be altered without the prior approval of Council. In addition, the septic tank shall not be buried or covered

ii.       There shall be no effluent runoff from the subject property to adjoining premises, public places or reserves

iii.      There shall be available all year round, adequate water supply that is available to the property

 

 

3.7     Prior to the commencement of construction works:

(a)     Toilet facilities at or in the vicinity of the work site shall be provided at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site. Each toilet provided must be:

·    A standard flushing toilet connected to a public sewer, or

·    If that is not practicable, an accredited sewage management facility approved by the council, or

·    Alternatively, any other sewage management facility approved by council

 

3.8     Roof and surface water shall be disposed of in accordance with the       approved drainage design. Overflow from the existing in-ground   rainwater tank is to be disposed of via a level spreader system

 

3.9      All landscaping works are to be constructed in accordance with the       stamped-approved plan by PGH Environmental Planning drawing No.    PGH-110397-LS0001 dated 26/10/2011 and sections F5”Planting        Techniques”, F8 “Quality Assurance Standards”, F9 “Site      Management Plan” of Penrith Councils Landscape Development           Control Plan

Landscaping shall be maintained:

          ·        In accordance with the approved plan, and

·        In a healthy state, and

·        In perpetuity by the existing or future owners and occupiers of the property

If any of the vegetation comprising that landscaping dies or is removed, it is to be replaced with vegetation of the same species and, to the greatest extent practicable, the same maturity, as the vegetation which dies or was removed

 

3.10    A copy of the Occupation Certificate and all necessary documentation supporting the issue of the Certificate is to be submitted to Penrith City Council, if Council is not the Principal Certifying Authority.  In the event that a Compliance Certificate was issued by the Principal Certifying Authority certifying compliance that all conditions of the development consent required to be met has in fact been met as well as any documentation stated above, shall be submitted to Penrith City Council if Council is not the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1.  

Locality Plan

1 Page

Appendix

2.  

Siting Pland and Landscaping

1 Page

Appendix

3.  

Site Plan & Elevations

2 Pages

Appendix

4.  

LEP & DCP table of requirements

6 Pages

Appendix

  


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                            20 February 2012

Appendix 1 - Locality Plan

 

temp


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                            20 February 2012

Appendix 2 - Siting Pland and Landscaping

 

temp


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                            20 February 2012

Appendix 3 - Site Plan & Elevations

 

temp


temp


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                            20 February 2012

Appendix 4 - LEP & DCP table of requirements

 

temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp

 


 

 

A Green City

 

 

There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


A Liveable City

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

6        Tender Reference 11/12-06, Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services Minor Buildings

 

7        Tender Reference 11/12-07, Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services Major Buildings

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A Liveable City

 

 

6

Tender Reference 11/12-06, Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services Minor Buildings   

 

Compiled by:               Laura Schuil, Acting Supply Officer - Contracts

Glen Tuckwell, Project Co-ordinator

Graham Howe, Building Projects Co-ordinator

Authorised by:            Hans Meijer, City Works Manager   

 

Objective

Our physical infrastructure is adaptable, and responds to changing needs

Community Outcome

A City with infrastructure that responds to community needs (17)

Strategic Response

Provide well-maintained community buildings (17.1)

       

 

Executive Summary

A tender for the Scheduled Maintenance for Mechanical Services in Minor Buildings including heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration equipment, was advertised on 14 October 2011 and closed on 1 December 2011. Tenderers were invited to tender for the contract work on a lump sum fixed price basis without rise or fall for a period of three (3) years with further 2 x 1 year options.

This report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process and recommends that the tender from CBD Mechanical Electrical be accepted.

Background

Tenders were advertised in the Western Weekender and the e-Tendering website on 14 October 2011 and in the Sydney Morning Herald on 18 October 2011.

 

The purpose of this request for tender was to seek a contractor with the proven ability to deliver works to Council’s specification.

 

The general scope of work comprises the scheduled maintenance and repair of air conditioning systems in minor buildings (generally split and small domestic systems). The scheduled maintenance shall be carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations for each item of equipment in conjunction with Council’s specification based on The Australian Institute of Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heating DA 19 HVAC&R Maintenance schedules and the relevant Australian Standards as applicable to the equipment and systems. Repairs and call outs not identified in the maintenance schedules will be charged at the nominated hourly rate, and quotations may be called for major repairs or replacement of plant. This contract applies to the existing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment currently installed and operating within the minor buildings that comprise part of the Penrith City Council’s asset register (approximately 62 buildings). It should be noted that the tender allows for the addition or deletion of plant or buildings from the list of assets over the contract period.

 

 

Tender Evaluation Committee

The Tender Evaluation Committee consisted of Glen Tuckwell (Building Projects and Maintenance Coordinator), Graham Howe (Building Projects Coordinator) and Laura Schuil (Acting Supply Officer).

Tender Evaluation Criteria

The selection criteria advertised and used in assessing the tenders were:

Evaluation Criteria - Tenderer’s Capability

 

Company Information

·    Tenderer profile

·    Company contact details

 

Commercial Requirements

·    Critical Assumptions

·    Conforming requirements

·    Conflict of Interest declaration

·    Insurances

·    Instrument of Agreement

·    Required Declarations

·    Compliance statement

·    Business References

 

Scope of requirements

·    Demonstrated Ability

·    Compliance to Specified Requirements

 

Cost / Price Category

·    Unit Rates

·    Financial viability

 

Management and Administration

·    Resources and Personnel

·    Employment Policies (Apprenticeships)

·    Environmental Management Systems

·    Industrial relations

·    Occupational Health & Safety

 

Summary of Tenders Received and Price Evaluation

Tenders were received from ten (10) companies for the supply of Scheduled Maintenance for Mechanical Services in Minor Buildings (approximately 62 buildings).

 

Allstaff Airconditioning (NSW) Pty Ltd

CBD Mechanical Electrical

Celltec Air Conditioning Pty Ltd

Fredon Air Pty Limited

Haden Engineering Pty Ltd

Hannan Technical Services Pty Ltd

Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd

Noppen Air Pty Ltd

Powerchill Air Conditioning

Ultimate Air Conditioning & Electrical (NSW) Pty Ltd

 

Following a detailed analysis of all tenders, each tender was evaluated against the evaluation criteria. The evaluation was used to determine a final ranking for each tender.

 

Consideration was then given to each of the tenderer’s lump sum and unit rates to determine the best value for money solution for Council.

 

Based on all compliance and cost considerations, the following tenders were shortlisted and ranked in the following order.

 

Name

Hourly Charge

Hourly Charge After Hours

Markup on Materials

Lump Sum Price for 3 years ex GST

CBD Mechanical Electrical

$70

$85

10%

$13,500.00

Haden Engineering Pty Ltd

$78

$95

15%

*$37,356.62

$22,196.62 exc parts

Hannan Technical Services Pty Ltd

$85

$110

22%

$25,630.00

Celltec Air Conditioning Pty Ltd

$85

$120

10%

$23,700.00

Noppen Air Pty Ltd

$65

$100

10%

$20,225.70

Fredon Air Pty Limited

$75

$110

15%

$36,351.00

Powerchill Air Conditioning

$70

$85

0%

$46,920.00

Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd

$79

$106

15%

$62,768.00

Ultimate Air Conditioning & Electrical (NSW) Pty Ltd

$60

$95

18%

$140,760.00

Allstaff Airconditioning (NSW) Pty Ltd

$85

$96

15%

$311,040.00

*Haden has allowed $15,160.00 for spare parts in their lump sum price.

 

The tenders submitted by Haden Engineering Pty Ltd, Hannan Technical Services Pty Ltd and Celltec Air Conditioning Pty Ltd demonstrated their ability to perform the works, however there was no advantage to Council in further considering these higher priced tenders.

 

The tender submitted from CBD Mechanical Electrical is considered to provide Council the most cost effective delivery for maintaining the mechanical services in Council’s minor facilities based on their high level of compliance, demonstrated ability to meet Council’s requirements, and competitive hourly or schedule of rates for the services offered.

 

CBD Mechanical Electrical was established in 1982 servicing the Sydney metropolitan area. They currently service a number of statutory bodies including Waverley Council and Sydney City Council. The company specialises in servicing air conditioning, building management systems, electrical and fire safety systems.

Conclusion

This report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process and recommends that the tender from CBD Mechanical Electrical be accepted.

 

Tender Assessment Group (TAG)

 

The Tender Assessment Group (TAG) comprising the Group Manager ~ Legal and Governance, Stephen Britten and the Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil met to consider a tender for the Scheduled Maintenance for Mechanical Services in Minor Buildings including heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration equipment.

 

Enquiries were made with members of the Tender Evaluation Committee about the recommended tenderer. The TAG was advised that Waverley Council had provided a good reference for the quality of the work provided by the recommended tenderer and that they were confident that the Council’s buildings could be inspected within the time allocated within the tender.

 

Based on the information contained within the report, the TAG agrees with the methodologies used by the Tender Evaluation Committee  and supports the recommended tender submitted by CBD Mechanical Electrical be accepted.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 11/12-06, Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services Minor Buildings be received.

2.     CBD Mechanical Electrical be appointed as the preferred contractor for the provision of Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services in Minor Buildings for a period of 3 years for a lump sum price of $13,500 (ex GST, with the option to extend for a further two (2) X one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory performance.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A Liveable City

 

 

7

Tender Reference 11/12-07, Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services Major Buildings   

 

Compiled by:               Laura Schuil, Acting Supply Officer - Contracts

Graham Howe, Building Projects Co-ordinator

Joshua Martin-Lewis, Asset Co-ordinator

Authorised by:            Hans Meijer, City Works Manager   

 

Objective

Our physical infrastructure is adaptable, and responds to changing needs

Community Outcome

A City with infrastructure that responds to community needs (17)

Strategic Response

Provide well-maintained community buildings (17.1)

       

 

Executive Summary

A tender for the Scheduled Maintenance for Mechanical Services in Major Buildings including heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration equipment, was advertised on 14 October 2011 and closed on 1 December 2011. Tenderers were invited to tender for the contract work on a lump sum fixed price basis without rise or fall for a period of three (3) years with further 2 x 1 year options.

This report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process and recommends that the tender from Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd be accepted.

Background

Tenders were advertised in the Western Weekender and the e-Tendering website on 14 October 2011 and in the Sydney Morning Herald on 18 October 2011.

 

The purpose of this request for tender was to seek a contractor with the proven ability to deliver works to Council’s specification.

 

The general scope of work comprises the scheduled maintenance and repair of air conditioning systems in major buildings. The scheduled maintenance shall be carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations for each item of equipment in conjunction with Council’s specification based on The Australian Institute of Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heating DA 19 HVAC&R Maintenance schedules and the relevant Australian Standards as applicable to the equipment and systems. Repairs and call outs not identified in the maintenance schedules will be charged at the nominated hourly rate, and quotations may be called for major repairs or replacement of plant. This contract applies to the existing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment currently installed and operating within the major buildings including the Civic Centre and Library, Community Connection, Joan Sutherland Performing Arts Centre, Penrith Regional Gallery, Ripples Aquatic Centre, Penrith Pool, Penrith Senior Citizens and Penrith Valley Arts Precinct. It should be noted that the tender allows for the addition or deletion of plant or buildings from the list of assets over the contract period.

 

Tender Evaluation Committee

The Tender Evaluation Committee consisted of Graham Howe (Building Projects Coordinator), Joshua Martin (Asset Co-ordinator) and Laura Schuil (Acting Supply Officer- Contracts).

 

Tender Evaluation Criteria

The selection criteria advertised and used in assessing the tenders were:

Evaluation Criteria - Tenderer’s Capability

 

Company Information

·    Tenderer profile

·    Contact details

 

Commercial Requirements

·    Critical Assumptions

·    Conforming requirements

·    Conflict of Interest declaration

·    Insurances

·    Instrument of Agreement

·    Required Declarations

·    Compliance statement

·    Business References

 

Scope of requirements

·    Demonstrated Ability

·    Compliance to Specified Requirements

 

Cost / Price Category

·    Unit Rates

·    Financial viability

 

Management and Administration

·    Resources and Personnel

·    Employment Policies (Apprenticeships)

·    Environmental Management Systems

·    Industrial relations

·    Occupational Health & Safety

Summary of Tenders Received and Price Evaluation

Tenders were received from five (5) companies for the supply of Scheduled Maintenance for Mechanical Services in Major Buildings:

 

Allstaff Airconditioning (NSW) Pty Ltd

Fredon Air Pty Limited

Haden Engineering Pty Ltd

Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd

Ultimate Air Conditioning & Electrical (NSW) Pty Ltd.

 

Following a detailed analysis of all tenders, each tender was evaluated against the evaluation criteria. The evaluation was used to determine a final ranking for each tender.

 

Consideration was then given to each of the tenderers’ lump sum, time/hours allocated per site and unit rates to determine the best value for money solution for Council.

 

Based on all compliance and cost considerations, the following tenders were shortlisted and ranked in the following order.

 

Name

Hourly Charge

Hourly Charge After Hrs

Markup on Materials

Hrs Estimated per  annum

Lump Sum Price for 3 years ex GST

Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd

$79

$106

15%

483

$170,994.78

Haden Engineering Pty Ltd

$78

$95

15%

1055.1

$263,884.04

Fredon Air Pty Limited

$75

$110

15%

849

$265,457.04

Allstaff Airconditioning (NSW) Pty Ltd

$85

$96

15%

962

$241,902.00

Ultimate Air Conditioning & Electrical(NSW) Pty Ltd

$60

$95

18%

109.5

$78,840.00

 

The tender from Ultimate Air Conditioning & Electrical (NSW) Pty Ltd while on the surface looks attractive, only estimated 110 hrs per annum to service all nominated sites. Council officers evaluating the tenders were concerned that this company had not allowed the appropriate time to service the equipment specified. An independent mechanical consultant (EnFact Pty Limited) was engaged to estimate the time to service the equipment specified in the tender document at the Civic Centre and the results showed that approximately 196 hrs annually was required to service the equipment. Ultimate Air Conditioning & Electrical (NSW) Pty Ltd only estimated 24 hrs per annum to service the equipment and this clearly shows that this company did not allow sufficient time to service the Civic Centre equipment, as specified in the tender documents. The time estimated to service other nominated sites is also below estimates to service equipment to specifications and it is not considered that this company would be able to service the equipment to Council’s specification within the lump sum price submitted for the work.

 

The tenders submitted by Haden Engineering Pty Ltd, Fredon Air Pty Limited and Allstaff Airconditioning (NSW) Pty Ltd demonstrated their ability to perform the works, however there was no advantage to Council in further considering these higher priced tenders.

 

The tender from Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd is considered to give Council the most cost effective submission for maintaining the mechanical services in Council’s major facilities based on their high level of compliance, demonstrated ability to meet Council’s requirements, and competitive hourly or schedule of rates for the services offered. It should be noted that Hirotec had allowed 163hrs annually to service the equipment at the Civic Centre, although this is under the time estimated by the Consultant it is considered to be a realistic timeframe. Clarifications during the tender evaluation confirmed that tenderers had allowed for servicing all of the nominated equipment to Council’s specification regardless of time estimates included in the tender submission.

 

Hirotec are Council’s current contractor at the Civic Centre and have serviced the facility for approximately 5 years. The company was established in 1972, and has grown to become one of Australia's leading privately owned facility maintenance businesses, based in Kingsgrove, NSW. The company is well established with national operations and close to 200 staff. Hirotec is a privately owned national company specialising in the maintenance and engineering of integrated technical solutions comprising Mechanical, Electrical, Fire and Energy services. The Tender Evaluation Committee is confident that Hirotec can service the sites for the lump sum submitted. 

 

Financial Services Manager’s Comment

Included in the assessment of tender was the commissioning of independent reference checks, financial analysis and performance analysis on Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd. These checks were completed by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd and have been reviewed by Financial Services. Based on this review, no concern was raised as to the ability of Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd to perform the works described.

 

Conclusion

This report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process and recommends that the tender from Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd be accepted.

 

Tender Advisory Group (TAG) Comments

The Tender Assessment Group (TAG) comprising the Group Manager ~ Legal and Governance, Stephen Britten and the Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil met to consider a tender for the Scheduled Maintenance for Mechanical Services in Major Buildings including heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration equipment.

 

Enquiries were made with members of the Tender Evaluation Committee about the tender submitted by Ultimate Air Conditioning & Electrical (NSW) Pty Ltd. It was suggested to the members of the Tender Evaluation that an independent consultant should be engaged to evaluate the tender submitted by Ultimate Air Conditioning & Electrical (NSW) Pty Ltd.

 

Based on the information contained within the report, the TAG agrees with the methodologies used by the Tender Evaluation Committee  and supports the recommended tender submitted by Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd be accepted.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 11/12-07, Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services Major Buildings be received

2.     Hirotec Maintenance Pty Ltd  be appointed as the preferred contractor for the provision of Scheduled Maintenance of Mechanical Services in Major Buildings for a period of 3 years for a lump sum price of $170,994.78, with the option to extend for a further two (2) X one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory performance.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.  


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


 

 

A Vibrant City

 

 

There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled



Committee of the Whole

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

CONTENTS

 

Pecuniary Interests

 

Other Interests

 

Monday 20 February 2012

 

Item                                                                                                                                       Page

 

1        Presence of the Public                                                                                                        1

 

2        Property Matter - Assignment of Lease by Sapphires Cafe at 31 Blue Hills Drive Glenmore Park

 

3        Property Matter - Penrith Swimming Pool Site off Station Street Penrith

 

4        Land and Environment Court ruling, North Western Surveys Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council

 

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                             20 February 2012

A Leading City

 

 

1        Presence of the Public

 

Everyone is entitled to attend a meeting of the Council and those of its Committees of which all members are Councillors, except as provided by Section 10 of the Local Government Act, 1993.

A Council, or a Committee of the Council of which all the members are Councillors, may close to the public so much of its meeting as comprises:

 

(a)                the discussion of any of the matters listed below; or

(b)               the receipt or discussion of any of the information so listed.

The matters and information are the following:

 

(a)                personnel matters concerning particular individuals;

(b)               the personal hardship of any resident or ratepayers;

(c)                information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business;

(d)               commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed:

·                          prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or

 

·                          confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or

 

·                          reveal a trade secret.

 

(e)                information that would, if disclosed, prejudice the maintenance of the law;

(f)                matters affecting the security of the Council, Councillors, Council staff or Council property;

(g)        advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

The grounds on which part of a meeting is closed must be stated in the decision to close that part of the meeting and must be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.

The grounds must specify the following:

(a)                the relevant provision of section 10A(2);

(b)               the matter that is to be discussed during the closed part of the meeting;

(c)                the reasons why the part of the meeting is being closed, including (if the matter concerned is a matter other than a personnel matter concerning particular individuals, the personal hardship of a resident or ratepayer or a trade secret) an explanation of the way in which discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

Members of the public may make representations at a Council or Committee Meeting as to whether a part of a meeting should be closed to the public

The process which should be followed is:

 

·         a motion, based on the recommendation below, is moved and seconded

·         the Chairperson then asks if any member/s of the public would like to make representations as to whether a part of the meeting is closed to the public

·         if a member/s of the public wish to make representations, the Chairperson invites them to speak before the Committee makes its decision on whether to close the part of the meeting or not to the public.

·         if no member/s of the public wish to make representations the Chairperson can then put the motion to close the meeting to the public.

The first action is for a motion to be moved and seconded based on the recommendation below.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:

 

A Leading City

 

2        Property Matter - Assignment of Lease by Sapphires Cafe at 31 Blue Hills Drive Glenmore Park

This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

 

3        Property Matter - Penrith Swimming Pool Site off Station Street Penrith

This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

 

4        Land and Environment Court ruling, North Western Surveys Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council

This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.


 

ATTACHMENTS   

 

 

Date of Meeting:         Monday 20 February 2012

Delivery Program:      A Leading City

Issue:                            Deliver services for the City and its communities, and maintain our long term financial sustainability (4.1)

Report Title:                Delivery Program Six Month Progress Report

Attachments:               Delivery Program Progress Report



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                            20 February 2012

Attachment 1 - Delivery Program Progress Report

 

temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp



 

ATTACHMENTS   

 

 

Date of Meeting:         Monday 20 February 2012

Delivery Program:      A Leading City

Issue:                            Deliver services for the City and its communities, and maintain our long term financial sustainability (4.1)

Report Title:                2011-12 Operational Plan - December Quarter Review

Attachments:               2011-12 Operational Plan - Services Performance and Financial Review Summary progress to 31 December 2011



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                            20 February 2012

Attachment 1 - 2011-12 Operational Plan - Services Performance and Financial Review Summary progress to 31 December 2011

 

temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp


temp

 


 

ATTACHMENT       

 

 

 


Date of Meeting:          20 February 2012

 

Delivery Program:       A Leading City   

 

Program:                      Corporate Finance

 

Report Title:                 2011-2012 Voted Works