16 October 2013
Dear Councillor,
In pursuance of the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 and the Regulations thereunder, notice is hereby given that an ORDINARY MEETING of Penrith City Council is to be held in the Council Chambers, Civic Centre, 601 High Street, Penrith on Monday 21 October 2013 at 7:30PM.
Attention is directed to the statement accompanying this notice of the business proposed to be transacted at the meeting.
Yours faithfully
Alan Stoneham
General Manager
BUSINESS
1. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Leave of absence has been granted to:
Councillor Mark Davies - 14 October 2013 to 25 October 2013 inclusive.
2. APOLOGIES
Ordinary Meeting - 30 September 2013.
4. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Pecuniary Interest (The Act requires Councillors who declare a pecuniary interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)
Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Significant and Less than Significant (The Code of Conduct requires Councillors who declare a significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)
5. Presentation of letter from Mayor of Fujieda, Japan by Penrith Exchange Students
6. ADDRESSING COUNCIL
7. MAYORAL MINUTES
8. NOTICES OF MOTION TO RESCIND A RESOLUTION
9. NOTICES OF MOTION AND QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
10. ADOPTION OF REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEES
Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 14 October 2013.
Policy Review Committee Meeting - 14 October 2013.
11. DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS
12. REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS
13. URGENT BUSINESS
14. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Monday 21 October 2013
table of contents
ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR
STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION OF PENRITH CITY’S ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CULTURAL HERITAGE
PRAYER
COUNCIL CHAMBER seating arrangements
meeting calendar
confirmation of minutes
PROCEDURE FOR ADDRESSING COUNCIL MEETING
MAYORAL MINUTES
report and recommendations of committees
DELIVERY program reports
ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR
Australians all let us rejoice,
For we are young and free;
We’ve golden soil and wealth for toil;
Our home is girt by sea;
Our land abounds in nature’s gifts
Of beauty rich and rare;
In history’s page, let every stage
Advance Australia Fair.
In joyful strains then let us sing,
Advance Australia Fair.
Beneath our radiant Southern Cross
We’ll toil with hearts and hands;
To make this Commonwealth of ours
Renowned of all the lands;
For those who’ve come across the seas
We’ve boundless plains to share;
With courage let us all combine
To Advance Australia Fair.
In joyful strains then let us sing,
Advance Australia Fair.
Statement of Recognition of Penrith City’s
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Cultural Heritage
Council values the unique status of Aboriginal people as the original owners and custodians of lands and waters, including the land and waters of Penrith City.
Council values the unique status of Torres Strait Islander people as the original owners and custodians of the Torres Strait Islands and surrounding waters.
We work together for a united Australia and City that respects this land of ours, that values the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage, and provides justice and equity for all.
PRAYER
“Sovereign God, tonight as we gather together as a Council we affirm that you are the giver and sustainer of life. We come together as representatives of our community to make decisions that will benefit this city and the people within it.
We come not in a spirit of competition, not as adversaries, but as colleagues. Help us to treat each other with respect, with dignity, with interest and with honesty. Help us not just to hear the words we say, but also to hear each others hearts. We seek to be wise in all that we say and do.
As we meet, our concern is for this city. Grant us wisdom, courage and strength.
Lord, help us. We pray this in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.”
For members of the
public addressing the meeting
Council Chambers
Executive
Managers
Seating Arrangements
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Executive
Managers
2013 MEETING CALENDAR
January 2013 - December 2013
(adopted by Council 19/11/12)
|
TIME |
JAN |
FEB |
MAR |
APRIL |
MAY |
JUNE |
JULY |
AUG |
SEPT |
OCT |
NOV |
DEC |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
||
Ordinary Council Meeting |
7.30pm |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23^ü (7.00pm) |
|
|
16 (7.00pm) |
|
25@ |
25 |
29v |
27# |
24 * |
22 |
26@ |
30 |
21∞ |
25#+ |
|
||
Policy Review Committee |
7.00pm |
|
11 |
11 |
15 |
13 |
17 |
8 |
12 |
9 |
14 |
11 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v |
Meeting at which the draft corporate planning documents (Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program, Operational Plan, Resource Strategy) are endorsed for exhibition |
* |
Meeting at which the draft corporate planning documents (Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program, Operational Plan, Resource Strategy) are adopted |
# |
Meetings at which the Operational Plan quarterly reviews (March and September) are presented |
@ |
Meetings at which the Delivery Program progress reports (including the Operational Plan quarterly reviews for June and December) are presented |
^ |
Election of Mayor/Deputy Mayor |
ü |
Meeting at which the 2012-2013 Annual Statements are presented |
∞ |
Meeting at which any comments on the 2012-2013 Annual Statements are presented |
+ |
Meeting at which the Annual Report is presented |
- Extraordinary Meetings are held as required.
- Members of the public are invited to observe meetings of the Council (Ordinary and Policy Review Committee).
Should you wish to address Council, please contact the Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil.
OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF PENRITH CITY COUNCIL HELD IN THE
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ON MONDAY 30 SEPTEMBER 2013 AT 7:34PM
NATIONAL ANTHEM
The meeting opened with the National Anthem.
STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM read a statement of recognition of Penrith City’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage.
PRAYER
The Council Prayer was read by Council’s Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil.
PRESENT
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM and Councillors Bernard Bratusa, Prue Car, Kevin Crameri OAM, Marcus Cornish, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Maurice Girotto, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow OAM, Tricia Hitchen, Karen McKeown, John Thain and Michelle Tormey.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor Mark Davies declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 3 - Development Application DA13/0656 single storey dwelling & variation of 88B instrument to remove trees and build within a restricted area at Lot 18 DP1083294 (No. 26-28) Manifold Crescent, Glenmore Park as one of the owners of the property works part time in his wife’s office. Councillor Mark Davies indicated he would leave the meeting during discussion of the matter.
Councillor Marcus Cornish declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 4 - Development Application DA13/0592 proposed demolition of existing structures, construction of a new community facility for supported employment at Lot 1 DP132721 (47-49) Rance Road, Werrington as he has previously worked for the Thorndale Foundation. Councillor Marcus Cornish indicated he would leave the meeting during discussion of the matter.
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM declared a Pecuniary Interest in Item 4 - Development Application DA13/0592 proposed demolition of existing structures, construction of a new community facility for supported employment at Lot 1 DP132721 (47-49) Rance Road, Werrington as he is the auditor for the owners of the property. His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM indicated he would leave the meeting and vacate the chair for discussion of the matter.
247 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown that Standing Orders be suspended to allow members of the public to address the meeting, the time being 7:40pm. |
Ms Diane Pelle
Item 2 – Development Application 12/0721 Childcare centre at Lot B DP389004 & Lot A DP389004 (No. 168-170) Stafford Street, Penrith
Ms Pelle, the proponent, spoke in support of the proposed development and stated her view that there was a community need for the proposed childcare centre. Ms Pelle cited a shortage of 0-2 age group child care places in the area and stated that this facility will provide 16 places. Ms Pelle also outlined the positive impact the development would have on the area with parents able to return to work, the provision of employment opportunities and choice for parents as to which childcare centre to use.
Ms Suzy Bechaye
Item 2 – Development Application 12/0721 Childcare centre at Lot B DP389004 & Lot A DP389004 (No. 168-170) Stafford Street, Penrith
Ms Bechaye, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the proposed development as she believed it was not in the best interests of the community. Ms Bechaye stated that there were issues concerning lack of carparking spaces, traffic impact, impact on the surrounding environment, and DCP requirements for toilets. Ms Bechaye concluded by stating that she believed the site was unsuitable for the proposed childcare centre.
Ms Diane Burke
Item 2 – Development Application 12/0721 Childcare centre at Lot B DP389004 & Lot A DP389004 (No. 168-170) Stafford Street, Penrith
Ms Burke, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the recommendation and stated concerns surrounding parking and traffic issues, as traffic in the area was already heavy and that the development of a childcare centre in the street would compound the problem.
Mr Vikas Nagrad
Item 2 – Development Application 12/0721 Childcare centre at Lot B DP389004 & Lot A DP389004 (No. 168-170) Stafford Street, Penrith
Mr Nagrad, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the proposed development, stating that he works at the High Street Pre-school and they have a 50% vacancy in the 0-2 year old places.
Ms Belinda Colombrita
Item 4- Development Application DA13/0592 proposed demolition of existing structures, construction of a new community facility for supported employment at Lot 1 DP132721 (47-49) Rance Road, Werrington
Ms Colombrita, General Manager of Thorndale Foundation Ltd, spoke in support of the recommendation and provided advice on the support service the Foundation provides to people with disabilities.
Ms Shallon McDonald
Item 2 – Development Application 12/0721 Childcare centre at Lot B DP389004 & Lot A DP389004 (No. 168-170) Stafford Street, Penrith
Ms McDonald, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the proposed development, stating that she was the Manager of Bright Stars Kindergarten for 12 years. Ms McDonald cited concerns regarding car parking, noise limitations, and that all vacancies would not be likely to be filled at the proposed development.
Mr William Linehan
Item 5 -Development Application DA13/0405 Proposed Dwelling Addition to Existing Residence at Lot 97 DP 706003 (No. 4) Ogden Close, St Clair Applicant: Evolving Design & Drafting; Owner: Kerry Miles
Mr Linehan, the applicant, was present to answer any questions from the Council on the proposed development.
Ms Gai Hawthorn
Item 6- High Street, Penrith - "Triangle Park" Proposed Road Closure
Ms Hawthorn, representing the Penrith CBD Corporation, spoke in support of the recommendation, expressing her support for the process undertaken to date with the Masterplan and Tactical Urban workshop. Ms Hawthorn stated that the project is an opportunity for growth and that the closure of the road should be supported as the project is worth pursuing.
248 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM that Standing Orders be resumed, the time being 8:28pm. |
1 Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee Meeting held on 14 August 2013 |
249 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Karen McKeown seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee meeting held on 14 August, 2013 be adopted. |
2 Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on the 2 September 2013. |
250 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marcus Cornish seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 2 September, 2013 be adopted. |
3 Report and Recommendations of the Penrith Community Safety Partnership Meeting held on 4 September 2013 |
251 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Karen McKeown seconded Councillor Tricia Hitchen that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Penrith Community Safety Partnership meeting held on 4 September, 2013 be adopted. |
4 Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 9 September 2013 |
252 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Mark Davies that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 9 September, 2013 be adopted.
|
DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS
Outcome 1 - We can work close to home
Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth
2 Development Application 12/0721 Childcare centre at Lot B DP389004 & Lot A DP389004 (No. 168-170) Stafford Street, Penrith Applicant: Nor'side Investments Pty Ltd; Owner: Nor'side Investments Pty Ltd |
||||||||||||||||||||||
254 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Mark Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application 12/0721 Childcare centre at Lot B DP389004 & Lot A DP389004 (No. 168-170) Stafford Street, Penrith be received. 2. The objection pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards regarding landscaped area development standard under Clause 12(3) of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Land) be supported. 3. Development Application 12/0721 Childcare centre at Lot B DP389004 & Lot A DP389004 (No. 168-170) Stafford Street, Penrith be approved subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 3.1 A001 Approved plans A008 Works to BCA requirements A009 Residential works DCP A011 Engineering works DCP A012 Food shop A019 Occupation Certificate A020 Use of building A021 Business registration A023 Limit number of children (24) A026 Advertising sign A029 Hours of operation A039 Graffiti A043 Air conditioning unit A046 Obtain Construction Certificate before commencement of works B002 Australian Standard for demolition and disposal to approved landfill site and Occupational Hygienist clearance report prior to Occupational Certificate. B003 Asbestos disposal B004 Dust suppression B005 Mud/Soil
B006 Hours of work D001 Implement approved sediment and erosion control measures D005 No filling without prior approval D009 Covering of waste storage area D010 Appropriate disposal of excavated or other waste D014 Plant and equipment noise E001A BCA compliance (Class 2-9) E002 BCA issued to be addressed E006 Disabled access and facilities E009 Annual fire safety – essential fire safety (Class 2-9 buildings) F022 Commercial kitchens G002 Section 73 (not for single dwellings)
G004 Integral Energy
H001 Stamped plans and erection of site notice H002 Provision of site facilities prior to commencement of construction works H006 Implementation of waste management plan H013 Further details of building components H024 Glass installations to comply with AS 1288 H041 Hours of construction work K101 Works at no cost to Council K202 Roads Act- Minor Works K203 S138 – Roads Act K210 On site detention K213 Water quality K221 Access car parking and manoeuvring K501 Roads Authority Clearance K502 Works as executed plans K503 Stormwater compliance K504 Restriction as to user L001 Approved landscaping plans L003 Landscaping report requirements L005 Planting of plant material L006 Australian Standard landscaping requirements L007 Tree protection measures L008 Tree preservation order Q01F Notice of commencement and appointment of PCA Q006 Occupation Certificate Special Conditions 3.2 The development shall comply with the following community safety and CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) matters: (a) All gates shall be lockable. (b) The landscaping in the form of shrubs to the front of the car parking area shall be low in height. Dense vegetation with concentrated top to bottom foliage shall be avoided. The use of low vegetation will improve surveillance, provide clear lines of sight and avoid concealment areas along the frontage of the site. (c) The external lighting facing the driveway area shall have a wide beam of illumination which reaches to the beam of the next light, or the perimeter of the area being traversed (i.e. the car parking area) (d) Lighting shall be directed towards access/egress routes to illuminate potential offenders as well as the areas where people are most vulnerable (e) Lighting shall be contained within the property boundary and no light shall be projected upwards (f) Where appropriate, movement sensitive and diffused lights shall be used (g) All lighting shall be vandal resistant where practical. 3.3 Waste Management Plan for the development shall be in accordance with the relevant provisions of Section 2.9 (Waste Planning) of Penrith Development Control Plan 2006 and the childcare centre component must have as a minimum a weekly collection of the waste organised via a private contractor. 3.4 All car parking and manoeuvring must be in accordance with AS2890.1-2004; AS2890.6-2009 and Council's requirements. Appropriate sight lines shall be maintained from the driveway in accordance with AS 2890.1 (2004) 3.5 Dust suppression techniques are to be employed during demolition and construction to reduce any potential nuisances to surrounding properties. 3.6 The hours of operation for the centre are 7:00am to 6.00pm Monday to Friday. The centre is not to operate on weekends or public holidays. Staff are not to generate noise that can be heard from an adjacent premises before 7am. Deliveries and waste removal are to occur between 7.00am and 6.00pm Monday to Friday, excluding public holidays. 3.7 A maximum of sixty two (62) children are permitted in the centre at any one time. 3.8 An additional toilet shall be provided. Details shall accompany the application for a construction certificate. 3.9 A maximum of sixteen (16) children aged between 0-2 years are allowed to play outside at any one time and twenty (20) children aged between 3-5 years are allowed to play outside at any one time. 3.10 The use of a public address system or amplified music is not permitted to be used in the outdoor play area. The use of amplified music within the building shall not be audible from residential boundaries. 3.11 The windows and doors of the indoor play rooms are to be kept closed when children are playing indoors. 3.12 Noise levels from the premises shall not exceed the relevant noise criteria detailed in the “Noise Assessment” by Acoustic Logic (dated 31/1/2013, refer 20120617.1/3007A/R1/JZ, revision 1). The recommendations provided in the above-mentioned documents are to be implemented and incorporated into the design and construction of the development, and shall be shown on plans accompanying the Construction Certificate application. 3.13 A report is to be obtained from a qualified acoustic consultant certifying that the development meets the relevant noise criteria and conditions of this consent. This report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate. The provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 apply to the development, in terms of regulating offensive noise. 3.14 A noise barrier is to be provided along all boundaries as recommended in the acoustic report entitled “Noise Assessment” by Acoustic Logic (dated 31/1/2013, refer 20120617.1/3007A/R1/JZ, revision 1). The noise barrier is to be 2.2 metres in height, of construction certified by the acoustic consultant. 3.15 Detailed plans and specifications of the sound barrier walls are to be submitted to Council prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate. The walls are to be satisfactorily completed prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate. 3.16 Within 12 months from the date of issuing the Occupation Certificate, a compliance report is to be prepared by a suitably qualified acoustic consultant to ensure that noise levels from and inside the development meet the noise emissions criteria set in the “Noise Assessment” by Acoustic Logic (dated 31/1/2013, refer 20120617.1/3007A/R1/JZ, revision 1). A Compliance Report on this testing is to be prepared using the test data and it is to determine whether the noise emissions criteria for the development are being complied with and whether any mitigation works are required. This report is to be prepared and provided to Council within sixty days of the testing. The report is to be approved by Council, with any recommendations being implemented in accordance with the approved report within twenty-one days from the direction of Council unless otherwise specified by Council. If Council is not the certifying authority for this development, the report is required to be provided to Penrith City Council for approval.
3.17 A Noise Management Plan (NMP) is to be prepared and submitted to Penrith City Council for consideration and approval prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate. The NMP shall be prepared by a suitably qualified consultant and may need to be amended to include the any comments provided by Council. The NMP is to:
a) address all noise related aspects of the development's construction and operational phases, including:
i) how the restriction on the number of children playing outside will be managed; and ii) a schedule describing the times of outdoor play for each group of children; and iii) the management of visitors in the carpark attending the site picking up/dropping of children.
b) Address the relevant conditions of this consent
c) Recommend any systems/controls to be implemented to minimise the potential for any adverse noise impact(s).
d) Incorporate a program for ongoing monitoring and review to ensure that the NMP remains contemporary with relevant environmental standards. The approved Noise Management Plan is to be implemented and complied with at all times.
3.18 Appropriate signage is to be provided to the carpark and entrance of the centre requesting patrons to minimise noise and protect the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood. Prior to the issue of an occupation certificate a suitable signage plan is to be submitted to Council for approval. The signage plan is to provide details on the location, sizing and wording of the proposed signs. The signs are to be erected prior to the issue of an occupation certificate.
3.19 A public contact number is to be displayed on the childcare centre signage and this phone line must be operational during business hours. A complaint register is to be maintained and must include complaint details and any actions taken to address those complaints. A copy of the complaint register is to be provided to Council upon request.
3.20 In the event of on going noise complaints relating to the development being received by Council, the owner and/or occupier of the development maybe required by Council to obtain the services of a suitably qualified acoustic consultant to undertake a noise impact assessment on the development to address the concerns of the community. The noise impact assessment report is to be prepared and provided to Council within 45 days of being requested. The assessment report is to be approved by Council, with any recommendations being implemented in accordance with the approved assessment report.
3.21 Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, a lighting system shall be installed for the development to provide uniform lighting across common areas and driveways.
Exterior lighting shall be located and directed in such a manner so as not to create a nuisance to surrounding landuses. The lighting shall be the minimum level of illumination necessary for safe operation. The lighting shall be in accordance with AS 4282 “Control of the obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting” (1997).
3.22 A designated hand wash basin must be supplied within the food preparation area for hand washing only. It must be supplied with warm water through a common spout in compliance with AS 4674- 2004 and Food Safety Standard 3.2.3. The hand wash basin must also be supplied with soap and paper towel. The hand wash basin must be hands free as required by AS 4674-2004. If there is a separate bottle preparation area within the Centre then it must also be supplied with an additional hand wash basin supplied with warm water through a common spout.
3.23 The garbage area must be constructed and maintained in accordance with the requirements of Food Safety Standard 3.2.3 and the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997. Specifically, external garbage storage areas are to be paved, graded, drained to a waste disposal system and provided with a hose tap to facilitate cleaning.
3.24 If the Centre wishes to utilize a dishwasher to sanitise food utensils and equipment, it must be capable of reaching 80oC for 2 minutes, 75oC for 10 min or 70oC for 15 min in the rinse cycle as required by A S4674-2004.
3.25 As required by AS 4674-2004, mechanical ventilation shall be provided in accordance with AS1668 Parts 1 & 2 to the dishwasher if it vents steam into the surrounding area to the extent that there is, or likely to be, condensation collecting on walls and ceilings. If required, the installer of the exhaust system shall certify and submit appropriate documentation to Council prior to the issuing of the Occupation Certificate that the system has been installed in accordance with AS1668.
3.26 All floors within the food business are to be constructed, finished and appropriately coved in accordance with AS 4674 – 2004.
3.27 All walls within the food business are to be of solid construction and finished in accordance with AS 4674 – 2004.
3.28 The ceiling is to be constructed in accordance with AS 4674 – 2004. Please note drop-in panels are not permitted.
3.29 The premise is to be proofed against the entry of pests in accordance with AS 4674 – 2004.
3.30 In addition to the hand wash basin located in the food preparation area, a hand wash basin with warm water through a common spout in compliance with AS 4674-2004 and Food Safety Standard 3.2.3 must be installed within or immediately adjacent to the toilet. This hand wash basin must also be supplied with soap and paper towel.
3.31 Wastewater generated from mop buckets, cleaning mops and other cleaning activities must be disposed of in a cleaner’s sink or other approved facility.
3.32 A food business notification reference number shall be obtained from the NSW Food Authority prior to commencement of business operations and a copy of the notification shall be submitted to Council. Notification can be completed on the NSW Food Authority’s Food Notify website at www.foodnotify.nsw.gov.au.
3.33 A satisfactory inspection from Council’s Environmental Health Department will be required prior to the issuing of the Occupation Certificate and operation of the business. The occupier is to contact the department to organise an appointment.
3.34 The recommendations of the Arboriculture Impact Assessment Report prepared by Urban Landscape Planners P/L shall be complied with. The trees required to be retained in accordance with this report shall be retained and at least 6 trees shall be planted on site to compensate for those removed.
3.35 The child care centre shall comply with the requirements of the Children’s Services Regulation 2004 and shall be appropriately licensed by NSW Community Services prior to the commencement of operation.
3.36 Trucks entering and leaving the site carrying construction materials that may generate dust shall be covered. Stockpiles of soil or other materials shall be covered or sprayed with water on a regular basis, particularly during dry or windy conditions.
4. Those who made submissions be advised of Council’s decision. In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
Having previously declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 3, Councillor Mark Davies left the meeting, the time being 8:49pm.
3 Development Application DA13/0656 single storey dwelling & variation of 88B instrument to remove trees and build within a restricted area at Lot 18 DP1083294 (No. 26-28) Manifold Crescent, Glenmore Park Applicant: Cityscape Planning & Projects; Owner: Parkes (Survey) Pty Ltd |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
255 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Greg Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA13/0656 single storey dwelling & variation of 88B instrument to remove trees and build within a restricted area at Lot 18 DP1083294 (No. 26-28) Manifold Crescent, Glenmore Park be received. 2. The restrictive covenant on the use of land numbered 9 referred to in the Section 88B Instrument of the Conveyancing Act 1919 applying to Lot 18 in DP 1083294 (known as No. 26-28) Manifold Crescent Glenmore Park be lifted/released to allow building within the restricted area. 3. All other lots burden by the restrictive covenant on the use of land numbered 9 (being Lots 6, 7, 19, 21 in DP1083294) also be lifted/released. 4. The Common Seal of Penrith City Council be affixed to all necessary documentation to vary/release the covenant. 5. The application be approved subject to the following conditions. Standard Conditions a. A001 – Stamped approved plans A008 – Works to BCA requirements A019 – Occupation Certificate A046 – Construction Certificate D001 – Sediment and erosion controls D009 – Waste storage D010 – Disposal of waste E001 – BCA compliance F006 – Water tank H001 – Stamped plans and erection of site notice H002 – All forms of construction H022 - Survey H036 – Water tank H037 – Safe supply of water H038 – Connection of tank H039 – Tank pump H041 – Hours of work K016 – Stormwater K026 – Stabilised access P002 – Fees Q01F – Notice of commencement Q05F – Occupation Certificate Special Conditions 5.2 To further protect the trees being retained, the dwelling is to be positioned 1 metre closer to the North Eastern boundary of Manifold Crescent. The revised dwelling position must maintain a rear setback of 4 metres measured to the external wall of the theatre room. Amended plans showing the revised setbacks are to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.
5.3 Cut operations on the
property are only permitted in conjunction with the building works as
detailed on the approved plans and specifications, and shall not extend more
than 2 metres past the defined building footprint or where tree protection
measures are required. All fill is to be contained within the building
footprint by the use of dropped edge beams.
5.4 An
Infrastructure Restoration Bond is to be lodged with Penrith City Council for
development involving works around Council's Public Infrastructure Assets.
The bond is to be lodged with Council prior to the issue of a Construction
Certificate. The bond is based upon the estimated value of the works with a
bond of $500.00 payable for the subject development.
5.5 Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate a Roads Act application, including payment of application and inspection fees shall be lodged with Penrith City Council, as the Roads Authority, for the following works: a) Provision of a vehicular crossing/s. b) Opening the road reserve for the provision of services including stormwater.
c) Placing of hoardings, containers, waste skips, etc. in the road reserve.
All works within the road reserve shall be carried out in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works. Penrith City Council (being the Roads Authority under the Roads Act) shall approve the works completed on or over the road reserve. Contact Council’s City Works Department on (02) 4732 7777 to arrange an inspection of the works (and payment of inspection fees, if required).
5.6 Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall ensure that all works within the road reserve have been inspected and approved by Penrith City Council. 5.7 Prior
A landscape plan is to be prepared by a professional listed in Council's
Approved Landscape Consultants Register and submitted to the Principal
Certifying Authority for consideration and approval prior to the
issue of a Construction Certificate. The landscape plan should
include suitable replacement trees for those being removed. · in accordance with the approved plan, and · in a healthy state, and · in perpetuity by the existing or future owners and occupiers of the property. If any of the vegetation comprising that landscaping dies or is removed, it is to be replaced with vegetation of the same species and, to the greatest extent practicable, the same maturity, as the vegetation which died or was removed.
5.8 The development is to be carried out in accordance with the stamped-approved Tree Impact Report No. 3406, by Monaco Designs P/L, and dated 07th June 2013, including: · Replacement trees must be planted and the trees to be retained must be protected. · The recommendations in the Tree Impact Report must be adopted.
· The owner/builder must employ an arborist to supervise and install tree protection measures in accordance with the Tree Impact Report and AS4970- 2009 Australian Standard® Protection of Trees on Development Sites prior to commencement of any works or construction.
In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
Councillor Mark Davies returned to the meeting, the time
being 8:51pm.
Having previously declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 4, Councillor Marcus Cornish left the meeting, the time being 8:52pm.
Having previously declared a Pecuniary Interest in Item 4, His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM left the meeting, the time being 8:52pm.
Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM then took the Chair for consideration of Item 4, the time being 8:52pm.
4 Development Application DA13/0592 proposed demolition of existing structures, construction of a new community facility for supported employment at Lot 1 DP132721 (47-49) Rance Road, Werrington Applicant: Paynter Dixon; Owner: Thorndale Foundations Ltd |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
256 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Maurice Girotto That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA13/0592 proposed demolition of existing structures, construction of a new community facility for supported employment at Lot 1 DP132721 (47-49) Rance Road, Werrington be received. 2. The request to waive the Section 94 Contributions be supported based on the information contained within this report. 3. Development Application 13/0592 at Lot 1 DP 132721 (47-49) Rance Road be granted consent subject to the following conditions: 3.1 A001 The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the plans and documents contained within the table below and stamped approved by Council, the application form, and any supporting information received with the application, except as may be amended in red on the attached plans and by the following conditions.
A019 The development shall not be used or occupied until an Occupation Certificate has been issued. A029 The operating hours are from 8 am to 5 pm Mondays to Fridays. Delivery and service vehicles generated by the development are limited to 7am and 6 pm Monday to Friday. A039 Procedures should be in place to ensure that any vandalism, damage or broken fixtures are repaired promptly. This includes replacement of broken lights, removal of graffiti, litter removal and other general maintenance to ensure the development is clean and tidy.
A046 A Construction Certificate shall be obtained prior to commencement of any building works.
B002 All demolition works are to be conducted in accordance with the provisions of AS 2601-1991 “The Demolition of Structures”. Prior to demolition, all services shall be suitably disconnected and capped off or sealed to the satisfaction of the relevant service authority requirements.
All demolition and excavated material shall be disposed of at a Council approved site or waste facility. Details of the proposed disposal location(s) of all excavated material from the development site shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to commencement of demolition.
B003 Prior to commencement of demolition works on site the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that: · Measures are in place so as to comply with the WorkCover Authority's "Short Guide to Working with Asbestos Cement" and · The person employed to undertake the works is a licensed asbestos removal contractor and is holder of a current WorkCover Asbestos Licence. Any demolition works involving the removal of all asbestos shall only be carried out by a licensed asbestos removal contractor who has a current WorkCover Asbestos Licence. All asbestos laden waste, including asbestos cement flat and corrugated sheeting must be disposed of at a tipping facility licensed by the Environmental Protection Authority to receive asbestos wastes.
B004 Dust suppression techniques are to be employed during demolition to reduce any potential nuisances to surrounding properties. B005 Mud and soil from vehicular movements to and from the site must not be deposited on the road. B006 Demolition works will be restricted to the following hours in accordance with the NSW Environment Protection Authority Noise Control Guidelines: · Mondays to Fridays, 7am to 6pm · Saturdays, 7am to 1pm (if inaudible on neighbouring residential premises), otherwise 8am to 1pm · No demolition work is permitted on Sundays and Public Holidays. In the event that the demolition relates to works inside the building and do not involve external walls or the roof, and do not involve the use of equipment that emits noise then the demolition works are not restricted to the hours stated above. The provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act, 1997 in regulating offensive noise also apply to all construction works. D001 Erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed prior to the commencement of works on site including approved clearing of site vegetation. The erosion and sediment control measures are to be maintained in accordance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan(s) for the development and the Housing NSW “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004. (Note: To obtain a copy of the publication, you should contact Urban Growth NSW on (02) 98418600). D006 No fill material shall be imported to the site until such time as a Validation Certificate (with a copy of any report forming the basis for the validation) for the fill material has been submitted to the PCA and Council. The Validation Certificate shall: · state the legal property description of the fill material source site, · be prepared by an appropriately qualified person, · clearly indicate the legal property description of the fill material source site, · provide details of the volume of fill material to be used in the filling operations, · provide a classification of the fill material to be imported to the site in accordance with the Environment Protection Authority's "Environmental Guidelines: Assessment, Classification & Management of Non-Liquid Wastes" 1997, and · based on the fill classification) determine whether the fill material is suitable for its intended purpose and land use and whether the fill material will or will not pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. If the Principal Certifying Authority or Penrith City Council is not satisfied that suitable fill materials have been used on the site, further site investigations or remediation works may be requested. In these circumstances the works shall be carried out prior to any further approved works. D009 All waste materials stored on-site are to be contained within a designated area such as a waste bay or bin to ensure that no waste materials are allowed to enter the stormwater system or neighbouring properties. The designated waste storage areas shall provide at least two waste bays / bins so as to allow for the separation of wastes, and are to be fully enclosed when the site is unattended. D010 All excavated material and other wastes generated as a result of the development are to be re-used, recycled or disposed of in accordance with the approved waste management plan. Waste materials not specified in the approved waste management plan are to be disposed of at a lawful waste management facility. Where the disposal location or waste materials have not been identified in the waste management plan, details shall be provided to the Certifying Authority as part of the waste management documentation accompanying the Construction Certificate application. All receipts and supporting documentation must be retained in order to verify lawful disposal of materials and are to be made available to Penrith City Council on request. E006 Access and sanitary facilities for persons with disabilities are to be provided and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia and AS 1428 “Design for Access and Mobility”. Details of compliance are to be provided in the relevant plans and specifications accompanying the Construction Certificate application. E008 A fire safety list of essential fire or other safety measures shall be submitted to Penrith City Council prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. The fire safety list shall specify all measures (both current and proposed) that are required for the building so as to ensure the safety of persons in the building in the event of fire. The fire safety list must distinguish between: · the measures that are currently implemented in the building premises, and · the measures that are to be proposed to be implemented in the building premises, and must specify the minimum standard of performance for each measure. E009 The owner of a building, to which an essential fire safety measure is applicable, shall provide Penrith City Council with an annual fire safety statement for the building. The annual fire safety statement for a building must: a) deal with each essential fire safety measure in the building premises, and b) be given: · within 12 months after the last such statement was given, or · if no such statement has previously been given, within 12 months after a final fire safety certificate was first issued for the building. · As soon as practicable after the annual fire safety statement is issued, the owner of the building to which the statement relates: · must also provide a copy of the statement (together with a copy of the current fire safety schedule) to the Commissioner of New South Wales Fire Brigades, and · prominently display a copy of the statement (together with a copy of the current fire safety schedule) in the building. E01A All aspects of the building design shall comply with the applicable performance requirements of the Building Code of Australia so as to achieve and maintain acceptable standards of structural sufficiency, safety (including fire safety), health and amenity for the on-going benefit of the community. Compliance with the performance requirements can only be achieved by: a) complying with the deemed to satisfy provisions, or b) formulating an alternative solution which: · complies with the performance requirements, or · is shown to be at least equivalent to the deemed to satisfy provision, or c) a combination of (a) and (b). It is the owner's responsibility to place on display, in a prominent position within the building at all times, a copy of the latest fire safety schedule and fire safety certificate/ statement for the building.
H001 Stamped plans, specifications, a copy of the development consent, the Construction Certificate and any other Certificates to be relied upon shall be available on site at all times during construction. The following details are to be displayed in a maximum of 2 signs to be erected on the site: · the name of the Principal Certifying Authority, their address and telephone number, · the name of the person in charge of the work site and telephone number at which that person may be contacted during work hours, · that unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited, · the designated waste storage area must be covered when the site is unattended, and · all sediment and erosion control measures shall be fully maintained until completion of the construction phase. · Signage but no more than 2 signs stating the above details is to be erected: · at the commencement of, and for the full length of the, construction works onsite, and · in a prominent position on the work site and in a manner that can be easily read by pedestrian traffic. All construction signage is to be removed when the Occupation Certificate has been issued for the development. H002 Prior to the commencement of construction works: a) Toilet facilities at or in the vicinity of the work site shall be provided at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site. Each toilet provided must be: · a standard flushing toilet connected to a public sewer, or · if that is not practicable, an accredited sewage management facility approved by the council, or · alternatively, any other sewage management facility approved by council. b) All excavations and backfilling associated with the erection or demolition of a building must be executed safely and in accordance with the appropriate professional standards. All excavations associated with the erection or demolition of a building must be properly guarded and protected to prevent them from being dangerous to life or property.
c) If an excavation associated with the erection or demolition of a building extends below the level of the base of the footings of a building on an adjoining allotment of land, the person causing the excavation to be made: · must preserve and protect the building from damage, and · if necessary, must underpin and support the building in an approved manner, and · must, at least 7 days before excavating below the level of the base of the footings of a building on an adjoining allotment of land, give notice of intention to do so to the adjoining allotment of land and furnish particulars of the excavation to the owner of the building being erected or demolished. The owner of the adjoining allotment of land is not liable for any part of the cost of work carried out for the purposes of this condition, whether carried out on the allotment of land being excavated or on the adjoining allotment of land, (includes a public road and any other public place). d) If the work involved in the erection or demolition of a building is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place: · if necessary, an awning is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place, · the work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place, and any such hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed. H011 Detailed engineering plans and specifications relating to the work shall be submitted for consideration and approval prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate. H041 Construction works or subdivision works that are carried out in accordance with an approved consent that involve the use of heavy vehicles, heavy machinery and other equipment likely to cause offence to adjoining properties shall be restricted to the following hours in accordance with the NSW Environment Protection Authority Noise Control Guidelines: · Mondays to Fridays, 7am to 6pm · Saturdays, 7am to 1pm (if inaudible on neighbouring residential premises), otherwise 8am to 1pm · No work is permitted on Sundays and Public Holidays.
Other construction works carried out inside a building/tenancy and do not involve the use of equipment that emits noise are not restricted to the construction hours stated above. The provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act, 1997 in regulating offensive noise also apply to all construction works. K010 All roadworks, drainage works and dedications, required to effect the consented development shall be undertaken at no cost to Penrith City Council.
K203 Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate for building or subdivision works the Principal Certifying Authority and/ or Certifying Authority shall ensure that a Roads Act application, including the payment of application and inspection fees, has been lodged with, and approved by Penrith City Council (being the Roads Authority under the Roads Act), for the following works. · Provision of kerb and gutter, drainage and ancillary works in Rance Road · Removal of redundant vehicular crossings and reinstatement of kerb and gutter including associated path paving · Provisions of heavy-duty vehicular crossing · Provisions for signage indicating one way movements for Rance Road (for exiting traffic)
Civil design drawings are to be prepared strictly in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works. Note: 1) Where Penrith City Council is the Certifying Authority for the development the Roads Act approval for the above works may be issued concurrently with the Construction Certificate. 2) Contact Penrith City Council’s Development Engineering Unit on (02) 4732 7777 to ascertain applicable fees. K210 Stormwater drainage shall be provided generally in accordance with the concept plan/s lodged for development approval, prepared by Abel and Brown Pty Ltd, reference number 2248, revision B, dated August 2013. The proposed development and stormwater drainage system shall be designed to ensure that stormwater runoff from upstream properties is conveyed through the site without adverse impact on the development or adjoining properties. Engineering plans and supporting calculations for the on-site detention system are to be prepared by a suitably qualified person and shall accompany the application for a Construction Certificate. Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority shall ensure that the on-site detention system has been designed in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works. K215 Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority shall ensure that all habitable floor levels are a minimum of RL 24.7m AHD (standard flood level + 0.5m). K221 Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate
the Certifying Authority shall ensure that vehicular access, circulation,
manoeuvring, pedestrian and parking areas associated with the subject
development are in accordance with AS 2890.1, AS2890.2, AS2890.6 and
Penrith City Council’s Development Control Plan. K223 Prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate a performance bond is to be lodged with Penrith City Council for all works in Rance Road.
The value of the bond shall be determined in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Bond Policy. The bond will be administered in accordance with this policy. Note: Contact Council’s Development Engineering Unit on 4732 7777 for further information relating to bond requirements.
K501 Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall ensure that all works within the road reserve have been inspected and approved by Penrith City Council.
K502 After completion of all civil works, works-as-executed drawings and compliance documentation shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.
K503 Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate the Principal Certifying Authority shall ensure that the: a) Stormwater System & OSD System · Have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate and the requirements of this consent. · Have met the design intent with regard to any construction variations to the approved design. · Any remedial works required to been undertaken have been satisfactorily completed. Details of the approved and constructed system/s shall be provided as part of the works-as-executed drawings.
K504 Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate a restriction as to user and positive covenant relating to the:
a) On-site detention system/s Shall be registered on the title of the property. The restriction as to user and positive covenant shall be in Penrith City Council’s standard wording as detailed in Penrith City Council’s Design and Construction Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works.
K509 Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate directional signage and linemarking shall be installed indicating directional movements and the location of customer parking to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority.
K513 Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate a maintenance bond is to be lodged with Penrith City Council for all works located in Rance Road. The value of the bond shall be determined in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Bond Policy. The bond will be administered in accordance with this policy.
Note: Contact Council’s Development Engineering Unit on 4732 7777 for further information relating to bond requirements.
L001 All landscape works are to be constructed in accordance with the stamped-approved plan and Sections F5 "Planting Techniques", F8 "Quality Assurance Standards", F9 "Site Management Plan" of Penrith Council's Landscape Development Control Plan. Landscaping shall be maintained: · in accordance with the approved plan, and · in a healthy state, and in perpetuity by the existing or future owners and occupiers of the property. If any of the vegetation comprising that landscaping dies or is removed, it is to be replaced with vegetation of the same species and, to the greatest extent practicable, the same maturity, as the vegetation, which died or was removed.
Q01F Prior to the commencement of any earthworks or construction works on site, the proponent is to: a) employ a Principal Certifying Authority to oversee that the said works carried out on the site are in accordance with the development consent and related Construction Certificate issued for the approved development, and with the relevant provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act and accompanying Regulation, and b) submit a Notice of Commencement to Penrith City Council.
The Principal Certifying Authority shall submit to Council an “Appointment of Principal Certifying Authority” in accordance with Section 81A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Information to accompany the Notice of Commencement Two (2) days before any earthworks or construction/demolition works are to commence on site (including the clearing site vegetation), the proponent shall submit a “Notice of Commencement” to Council in accordance with Section 81A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
3.2 Lighting is to be installed to the building entrance and drop-off point and is to provide sufficient illumination to ensure appropriate levels of visibility. 3.3 The catch drain along the northern edge of the site is to be designed to ensure that the accessible path of travel from the street frontage to the building entry is maintained. The final design of the catch drain is to be reviewed by an access consultant and certification provided that the path will continue to meeting relevant access standards. A heel safe, or similar, type drainage grate is to be provided. 3.4 The factory production area is only permitted to operate as an ancillary element to the Thorndale Foundation Community Facility. The factory production area is to be used for supported employment and continued development of persons with a disability who are clients of the Thorndale Foundation. 3.5 Noise levels from the premises shall not exceed the relevant noise criteria detailed in the Acoustic Assessment prepared by Acoustic Logic (dated 29/7/2013 ref 20130727.1/2907A/RO/JZ). The recommendations provided in the above-mentioned documents are to be implemented and incorporated into the design and construction of the development, and shall be shown on plans accompanying the Construction Certificate application. In this regard the recommendations are to include: · The glazing requirements stipulated in Section 6.1; and · The detailed review of the mechanical plant prior to Construction Certificate in Section 6.4; and · The enclosure constructed around the compressor as detailed in Section 6.4. A report is to be obtained from a qualified acoustic consultant certifying that the development meets the relevant noise criteria and conditions of this consent. This report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate. The provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 apply to the development, in terms of regulating offensive noise. 3.6 A Noise Management Plan (NMP) is to be prepared and submitted to Penrith City Council for consideration and approval prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate. The NMP shall be prepared by suitably qualified consultants and may need to be amended to include the any comments provided by Council. The NMP is to: · address all noise related aspects of the development's operational phases, including; - management of the car park; - Operations of the warehousing component; and - Visitors to the site for day programs. · address the relevant conditions of this consent. · recommend any systems/controls to be implemented to minimise the potential for any adverse noise impact(s). · incorporate a program for ongoing monitoring and review to ensure that the NMP remains contemporary with relevant environmental standards. The approved Noise Management Plan is to be implemented and complied with at all times. Any proposed changes to this Plan require approval from Council. 3.7 A public contact number is to be displayed on the facility signage and this phone line must be operational during business hours. A complaint register is to be maintained and must include complaint details and any actions taken to address those complaints. A copy of the complaint register is to be provided to Council upon request. In the event of on going noise complaints relating to the development being received by Council, the owner and/or occupier of the development maybe required by Council to obtain the services of a suitably qualified acoustic consultant to undertake a noise impact assessment on the development to address the concerns of the community. The noise impact assessment report is to be prepared and provided to Council within 45 days of being requested. The assessment report is to be approved by Council, with any recommendations being implemented in accordance with the approved assessment report. 3.8 All car parking and manoeuvring must be in accordance with AS2890.1:2004 and AS2890.6-2009. 3.9 The required sight lines around the driveway entrance are not to be compromised by street trees, landscaping or fencing. 3.10 All vehicles are to enter and leave the site in a forward direction. 3.11 Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority shall ensure that the access driveway on Rance Road has been designed to facilitate two way heavy vehicular movements between the property boundary and the roadway. 3.12 Landscape plantings are to be maintained to ensure passive surveillance from the landscaped terrace and street frontage. In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM and Councillor Marcus Cornish returned to the meeting the time being 8:53pm.
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM took the Chair the time being 8:53pm.
5 Development Application DA13/0405 Proposed Dwelling Addition to Existing Residence at Lot 97 DP 706003 (No. 4) Ogden Close, St Clair Applicant: Evolving Design & Drafting; Owner: Kerry Miles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
257 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Tricia Hitchen That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA13/0405 Proposed Dwelling Addition to Existing Residence at Lot 97 DP 706003 (No. 4) Ogden Close, St Clair be received. 2. The SEPP 1objection be supported. 3. The application be approved subject to the following conditions. 3.1 A001 Approved plans that are architecturally drawn A008 Works to BCA requirements A019 Occupation Certificate A046 Obtain a Construction Certificate D001 Implement approved sediment & erosion control measures D007 Filling of land D009 Covering of waste storage area D010 Appropriate disposal of excavated or other waste E001 BCA compliance ESPECIAL Smoke detector H001 Stamped plans H009 Cut/fill details H030 Roof finishes H041 Hours of Work J004 Pool fencing K016 Stormwater K041 Bond L008 Tree Preservation Order P002 Fees associated with Council land Q01F Notice of Commencement of Appointment of PCA Q05F Occupation/Compliance Certificate
In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
Outcome 3 - We can get around the City
259 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Prue Car seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on WSROC Tender WR06-12/13-Pavement Marking Services be received. 2. A new three (3) year contract, for the provision of Pavement Marking Services, with an option to extend for a further two (2) x one (1) year periods, subject to satisfactory performance and with provision for rise and fall, be awarded to Complete Linemarking Services Pty Ltd as the primary contractor and Combined Traffic Management Pty Ltd as the secondary contractor. |
260 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Tricia Hitchen seconded Councillor Marcus Cornish That: 1. The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 13/14-02 Relocation of Power Poles be received. 2. Lend Lease Infrastructure Services Pty Limited be awarded the contract for the Relocation of Power Poles on Great Western Highway for a lump sum cost of $43,446 (excluding GST) |
9 Tender Reference 12/13-05 Disposal of Construction, Street Sweeper and Drainage Waste |
261 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Bernard Bratusa That: 1. The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 12/13-05 Disposal of Construction, Street Sweeper and Drainage Waste be received 2. A new three (3) year contract with the option to extend for a further two (2) x one (1) year periods (subject to satisfactory performance) be awarded to Hi Quality Recycling Services for the disposal of Broken Concrete, Broken Concrete Containing Reinforcement, Broken Asphalt, Road Profiled Asphalt Materials, Road Profiled Asphalt and Base Materials, Top Soil, Top Soil Including Vegetation, Clay, Clay Including Tree Roots, General Council Spoils (Combination of above materials) and Green Waste 3. A new three (3) year contract with the option to extend for a further two (2) x one (1) year periods (subject to satisfactory performance) be awarded to Express Waste Pty Ltd for the transport and disposal of Drainage Materials from the Open Drains and Street Sweepers as per the alternate offer provided based on disposal per bin and not weight. |
10 High Street, Penrith - "Triangle Park" Proposed Road Closure |
262 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Tricia Hitchen seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch That: 1. The information contained in the report on High Street, Penrith - "Triangle Park" Proposed Road Closure be received. 2. Prior to the closure of High Street associated with “Triangle Park” the following shall be undertaken: a. the Roads and Maritime Services be requested to consider changes to the signal phasing at the intersection of Henry Street and Riley Street to provide a 12 second hold for Riley Street vehicular traffic as an interim measure. This includes changing the left kerb side lane to “Left Turn Only”.
b. an application be made to the Roads and Maritime Services requesting consideration and approval for a “Timed Pedestrian Protection” phase at the signalised intersection of Henry Street and Riley Street for left-turning vehicles from Riley Street.
c. the Traffic Modelling report prepared by GHD titled “Penrith City Council Penrith Triangle – Traffic Diversion Traffic Modelling Report” be submitted to the Roads and Maritime Services, together with lunchtime pedestrian number counts, to request the RMS to re-phase the existing traffic control signals at the intersection of Henry Street and Riley Street to cater for the changed traffic conditions due to the proposed road closure.
3. Subject to approval from the Roads and Maritime Services, the following be undertaken: a. the left kerb side lane in Riley Street between Henry and High Street be changed to left turn only immediately prior of the High Street closure. The right kerb side lane be right turn and straight through.
b. The interim measure which includes a 12 second hold for Riley Street traffic to give pedestrians crossing Henry Street an opportunity to cross without vehicle conflicts be implemented. A Traffic Control Plan be prepared and implemented to advise pedestrians and motorists of changed traffic conditions for the intersection. These works be implemented immediately prior of the High Street closure.
c. immediately prior of the High Street closure, the Traffic Control signals at the intersection of Henry Street and Riley Street be re-phased to accommodate the increase in traffic volume as a result of the High Street closure.
d. Council engage a contractor to implement the left turn “Timed Pedestrian Protection” for Riley Street traffic turning left into Henry Street. These works be implemented and operational within six weeks of the closure of High Street.
e. Following implementation and commission of the “Timed Pedestrian Protection” for Riley Street traffic turning left into Henry Street the interim measure be decommissioned.
4. Traffic and pedestrian patterns at the intersections of:
a. Henry Street/Station Street b. Riley Street/Henry Street c. Station Street High Street d. Riley Street/High Street
be reviewed at a maximum of six weeks, three months, six months and twelve months following the closure of High Street, to ensure efficiency and safety at the intersection is maintained. Should any deficiencies be identified during the reviews, remedial action be undertaken.
5. Council write to the Roads and Maritime Services with regard to Council’s previous requests for additional “Timed Pedestrian Protection” at the intersection of Henry Street/Worth Street and Worth Street/Union Road and Council conduct pedestrian counts at the intersection to determine the volume of pedestrians and provide this information to the Roads and Maritime Services. In addition, Council again write to the Roads and Maritime Services and request an update on their investigations regarding the provision of “Watch for Pedestrians” signage at the intersection of Henry Street and Worth Street, Penrith.
6. Should the recommended reviews (listed in recommendation 3) identify deficiencies that cannot be remediated through signal re-phasing or remedial action, an urgent report be prepared for the Local Traffic Committee to consider the immediate decommission of the High Street closure and re-opening of High Street to traffic.
7. A copy of this report be provided to the Roads and Maritime Services to satisfy the Roads and Maritime Services conditional approval of the TMP. The Roads and Maritime Services be requested to advise Council if their condition regarding an ‘assessment of pedestrian safety’ has been satisfied. As required by the Roads and Maritime Services conditional approval, the endorsement is required prior to the closure of High Street. |
Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places
263 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Mark Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown That: 1. The information contained in the report on Penrith Community Safety Plan 2013-2016 be received. 2. Council adopt the Penrith Community Safety Plan 2013-2016. 3. Council support the submission of the Penrith Community Safety Plan 2013-2016 to the NSW Department of Attorney General and Justice for their endorsement in accordance with the Children (Protection and Parental Responsibility) Act 1997.
|
Outcome 6 - We're healthy and share strong community spirit
264 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Mark Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Community Assistance Program Planned Component 2013-14 be received. 2. Council receive the report and approve funding of the applications and amounts totalling $30,794 as outlined in Table 3 of this report.
|
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
265 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Mark Davies that the information contained in the report on Audit Committee be received. |
266 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Mark Davies that the information contained in the report on 2013-14 Financial Assistance Grant be received. |
267 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Mark Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Review of Delegations be received. 2. Council, in accordance with Section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993, approve the delegation of its functions and responsibilities under the Act and other Acts to the General Manager as listed in “Schedule 1 – Proposed Delegations of Authority to the General Manager” that is appended to this report. 3. Council, in accordance with Section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993, delegate authority to Council’s committees, as shown in “Schedule 2 – Delegations of Authority to Committees” that is appended to this report. 4. Council, in accordance with Section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993, delegate authority to the entities as listed in “Schedule 3 – Delegations of Authority to Other Entities” that is appended to this report. 5. Council’s Seal of Authority be placed on the Certificate of Identification for officers with delegated authority under the Swimming Pools Act 1992. |
268 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Mark Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Lease agreement at 367 - 369 Mamre Road, Orchard Hills be received. 2. The Common Seal of the City of Penrith be placed on all necessary documentation. |
18 Commercial Matter - Council Property - Easement for Stormwater Drainage over Lot 69 DP9969, 29 Australia Street, St Marys |
269 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Mark Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Commercial Matter - Council Property - Easement for Stormwater Drainage over Lot 69 DP9969, 29 Australia Street, St Marys be received. 2. Council grant T. Makari an easement for drainage 2m wide over Lot 69, DP9969 as per the conditions outlined in this report. 3. Council accept the compensation amount as outlined in this report for the effect of the easement. 4. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all necessary documentation. |
21 Summary of Investments & Banking for the period 1 August to 31 August 2013 |
270 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Mark Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Summary of Investments & Banking for the period 1 August to 31 August 2013 be received. 2. The Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer and Summaries of Investments and Performance for the period 1 August 2013 to 31 August 2013 be noted and accepted. 3. The graphical investment analysis as at 31 August 2013 be noted. |
271 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Mark Davies seconded Councillor Greg Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Penrith Business Alliance - Nomination of Board Member be received. 2. Council nominate The Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM to fill the vacancy on the Penrith Business Alliance. |
19 Commercial Matter - Station Street, Penrith (Lot c DP 158845) |
272 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marcus Cornish seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on Commercial Matter - Station Street, Penrith (Lot c DP 158845) be received. 2. Council support the proposed Classification as outlined in this report. 3. Under Section 34 of the Local Government Act, the proposed resolution to classify the property as ‘Operational’ be publicly notified for a period of 28 days. |
20 Appointment of a Director on the Board of the Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd |
273 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marcus Cornish seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on Appointment of a Director on the Board of the Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd be received. 2. Council endorse the appointment of Geoff Hunter to the Board of the Penrith Whitewater Stadium Limited. 3. A letter be sent from the Mayor thanking George Dodds for his contribution to the Penrith Whitewater Stadium Limited. |
Councillor Michelle Tormey left the meeting, the time being 9:25pm.
Councillor Michelle Tormey returned to the meeting, the time being 9:27pm.
REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS
Councillor Tricia Hitchen requested a memorandum reply to all Councillors providing an update on the ‘Tough Mudder’ event, in particular if it will continue to be run in the Penrith area. |
Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM requested a report to Council detailing a revision of options for the proposed pedestrian bridge over the Nepean River and considering options for instead building a new road bridge with 2 extra lanes and a safe walkway, allowing 4 lanes for crossing the Nepean River, including the Victoria Bridge. |
RR 3 Proposed high density development in Troy Street, Emu Plains |
Councillor Karen McKeown requested a memorandum reply to all South Ward Councillors providing information regarding any developers that may have contacted Council officers proposing a high density development in Troy Street, Emu Plains between Forbes Street and the Great Western Highway. |
Councillor Greg Davies requested a map of the land parcel owned by the Blue Cattle Dog Hotel, and also a copy of Council’s Signs Policy. |
Councillor Greg Davies requested a memorandum reply to all North Ward Councillors concerning a parcel of land in Lockyer Avenue, Werrington, which is to be reclassified and was to be offered for sale. |
RR 6 Construction of facilities for Little Athletics in Penrith LGA |
Councillor Prue Car requested a memorandum reply to all Councillors detailing what grant funding opportunities may be available for the construction of a new clubhouse and all weather athletics track for Little Athletics in the Penrith LGA. |
Councillor Mark Davies requested Leave of Absence from 14 October 2013 to 25 October 2013 inclusive.
|
274 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as a matter of urgency.
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
|
275 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM that Leave of Absence be granted to Councillor Mark Davies from 14 October 2013 to 25 October 2013 inclusive. |
276 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the meeting adjourn to the Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters, the time being 9:41pm.
1 Presence of the Public
CW1 RESOLVED on the motion of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the press and public be excluded from Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters:
Outcome 4
2 Commercial Matter - Licence Agreement for Nepean Food Services Incorporated
3 Commercial Matter - High Street, Penrith
The meeting resumed at 9:47pm and the Acting General Manager reported that the Committee of the Whole met at 9:41pm on 30 September 2013, the following being present
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM and Councillors Bernard Bratusa, Prue Car, Kevin Crameri OAM, Marcus Cornish, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Maurice Girotto, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow OAM, Tricia Hitchen, Karen McKeown, John Thain and Michelle Tormey.
and the Committee of the Whole excluded the press and public from the meeting for the reasons set out in CW1 and that the Committee of the Whole submitted the following recommendations to Council.
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
2 Commercial Matter - Licence Agreement for Nepean Food Services Incorporated |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor John Thain CW2 That: 1. The information contained in the report on Commercial Matter - Licence Agreement for Nepean Food Services Incorporated be received. 2. Nepean Food Services Incorporated be offered a new 5 year licence agreement based on the terms outlined in this report.
|
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor John Thain CW3 That: 1. The information contained in the report be received. 2. Council purchase the subject property, following satisfactory due diligence, in accordance with Points 1 – 3 as outlined in the conclusion of the report. 3. The General Manager be authorised to negotiate the loan. 4. The Common Seal of the City of Penrith be placed on all necessary documentation. 5. Under Section 34 of the Local Government Act, action be taken to advertise the proposed resolution to classify the property as ‘Operational’ for period of 28 days. |
ADOPTION OF Committee of the Whole
277 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Mark Davies that the recommendations contained in the Committee of the Whole and shown as CW1, CW2 and CW3 be adopted.
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9:48pm.
Procedure for Addressing Meetings
Anyone can request permission to address a meeting, providing that the number of speakers is limited to three in support of any proposal and three against.
Any request about an issue or matter on the Agenda for the meeting can be lodged with the General Manager or Public Officer up until 12 noon on the day of the meeting.
Prior to the meeting the person who has requested permission to address the meeting will need to provide the Public Officer with a written statement of the points to be covered during the address in sufficient detail so as to inform the Councillors of the substance of the address and a written copy of any questions to be asked of the Council in order that responses to those questions can be provided in due course.
In addition, prior to addressing the meeting a person addressing Council or Committee will be informed that they do not enjoy any privilege and that permission to speak may be withdrawn should they make inappropriate comments.
It should be noted that persons who wish to address the Council are addressing a formal part of the Council Meeting. All persons addressing the Meeting should give consideration to their dress attire. Smart casual is a minimum that is thought to be appropriate when addressing such a forum.
It should be noted that speakers at meetings of the Council or Committee do not have absolute privilege (parliamentary privilege). A speaker who makes any potentially offensive or defamatory remarks about any other person may render themselves open to legal action.
Prior to addressing the meeting the person will be required to sign the following statement:
“I (name) understand that the meeting I intend to address on (date) is a public meeting. I also understand that should I say or present any material that is inappropriate, I may be subject to legal action. I also acknowledge that I have been informed to obtain my own legal advice about the appropriateness of the material that I intend to present at the above mentioned meeting”.
Should a person fail to sign the above statement then permission to address either the Council or Committee will not be granted.
The Public Officer or Minute Clerk will speak to those people who have requested permission to address the meeting, prior to the meeting at 7.15pm.
It is up to the Council or Committee to decide if the request to address the meeting will be granted.
Where permission is to be granted the Council or Committee, at the appropriate time, will suspend only so much of the Standing Orders to allow the address to occur.
The Chairperson will then call the person up to the lectern or speaking area.
The person addressing the meeting needs to clearly indicate:
· Their name;
· Organisation or group they are representing (if applicable);
· Details of the issue to be addressed and the item number of the report in the Business Paper;
· Whether they are opposing or supporting the issue or matter (if applicable) and the action they would like the meeting to take;
· The interest of the speaker (e.g. affected person, neighbour, applicant, applicants spokesperson, interested citizen etc).
Each person then has five minutes to make their address. Those addressing Council will be required to speak to the written statement they have submitted. Permission to address Council is not to be taken as an opportunity to refute or otherwise the points made by previous speakers on the same issue.
The Council or Committee can extend this time if they consider if appropriate, however, everyone needs to work on the basis that the address will be for five minutes only.
Councillors may have questions about the address so people are asked to remain at the lectern or in the speaking area until the Chairperson has thanked them.
When this occurs, they should then return to their seat.
Glenn McCarthy
Public Officer
02 4732 7649
Reports of Committees
Item Page
1 Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on the 14 October 2013. 1
2 Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 14 October 2013 12
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
Local Traffic Committee MEETING
HELD ON 14 October, 2013
PRESENT
Michael Alderton – Road Network Services Engineer (Chairperson), Wayne Mitchell – Executive Manager Environment & City Development, Adam Wilkinson – Engineering Services Manager, Councillor Marcus Cornish, Councillor Hitchen – Representative for the Member for Penrith, Senior Constable Mark Elliott – St Marys Police, James Suprain – Roads & Maritime Services, Daniel Davidson – Road Safety Co‑ordinator, David Drozd – Senior Traffic Engineer, Ruth Byrnes - Senior Traffic Officer, Bernie Meier – Acting Engineering Co-ordinator, Martin Warda – Trainee Engineer
IN ATTENDANCE
Steve Grady – Busways, Joe Vocisano - Ranger
APOLOGIES |
Apologies were accepted from Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM, Councillor Karen McKeown, Sergeant Matt Shirvington – Penrith Police, Constable Bill Pearson – Penrith Police |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 2 September 2013 |
The minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting of 2 September 2013 were confirmed. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no declarations of interest.
DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS
Outcome 3 - We can get around the City
1 Fernhill Races Special Event - Traffic Management Plan Endorsement |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Fernhill Races Special Event - Traffic Management Plan Endorsement be received. 2. The event applicant be advised that this is a Class 1 Event under the “Guide to Traffic and Transport Management for Special Events”, and that all conditions and requirements specified in the Guide must be complied with prior to the event. 3. The Traffic Management Plan submitted by the event applicant detailing the proposed traffic diversions for the event to be held on 9 November 2013 be endorsed. The subsequent Traffic Control Plans incorporating all traffic devices be implemented in accordance with the Traffic Management Plan. 4. A Transport Management Plan including a Risk Management Plan be lodged by the event applicant with the Roads and Maritime Services for concurrence, prior to the event. A copy of the Roads and Maritime Services Traffic Management Centre’s approval must be submitted to Council prior to the event. 5. The event applicant obtain separate approval from the NSW Police and submit a Schedule 1 Form under the Summary Offences Act to the NSW Police prior to the event. A copy of the NSW Police approval must be submitted to Council prior to the event. 6. The applicant must submit to Council a copy of Public Liability Insurance (usually a Certificate of Currency) of minimum $10 million, prior to the event. In addition, the applicant indemnify Council in writing against all claims for damage and injury which may result from the proposed event. 7. A detailed series of Traffic Control Plans shall be prepared by a qualified and certified professional and submitted to Council, the Roads and Maritime Services and NSW Police prior to the event. 8. The event applicant arrange to place barricades and traffic cones and provide Roads and Maritime Services accredited Traffic Controllers where required by the endorsed Traffic Management Plan. Where the Traffic Management and Traffic Control Plans indicate Traffic Controllers are to be used, all Traffic Controllers must have current Roads and Maritime Services certification. 9. The event applicant must provide advice to Council prior to the event that the event complies with the NSW Occupational Health & Safety Act 2000 and the NSW Occupational Health & Safety Regulations 2001. 10. The event applicant advertise the proposed traffic diversions in local newspapers and other media as described in the Traffic Management Plan, a minimum of two weeks prior to the event. 11. The event applicant notify ambulance and fire brigade (NSW Fire Brigade and Rural Fire Service) and State Emergency Services of the proposed event and submit a copy of the notification to Council prior to the event. 12. The event applicant notify private bus companies and coach organisations and taxi companies of the proposed event and submit a copy of the notification to Council prior to the event. 13. The event applicant shall ensure that noise control measures are in place as required by the Protection of the Environment Operations (Noise Control) Regulation 2000. 14. All works as part of this approval are conducted at no cost to Council. 15. The event applicant to ensure that foliage is cleared near both access driveways to Fernhill Estate in order to improve sight distances for exiting vehicles. 16. The event applicant to ensure that railings within the existing fence be removed near the northern access driveway to Fernhill Estate in order to increase the access width for vehicles entering and exiting the site. 17. The event applicant to ensure that access driveway aprons are sealed with AC or similar in order to minimise rubble spilling onto Mulgoa Road. 18. TCP Plan #05 be updated to remove bollards currently shown within Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa. 19. The applicant be advised of Council’s resolution.
|
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Road Safety Program Update be received. 2. The information be noted.
|
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Saddington Street, St Marys - Proposed Changes to Parking Restrictions fronting Our Lady of the Rosary Primary School be received. 2. The existing 39m of part-time “No Parking” (school days) on Saddington Street, St Marys, fronting the school, be changed to unrestricted parking. 3. The existing part-time “No Stopping” (school days) on Saddington Street, St Marys, on the south side departure of the flagged Children’s Crossing, be extended to the west side of the school car park exit driveway. 4. Our Lady of the Rosary Primary School and Mrs Tanya Davies, Member for Mulgoa be advised of Council’s resolution.
|
4 Woodriff Street & Reserve Street, Penrith - Proposed Provision of Parking Restrictions |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Woodriff Street & Reserve Street, Penrith - Proposed Provision of Parking Restrictions be received. 2. “No Stopping” restrictions be provided in Reserve Street and Woodriff Street, Penrith, at the intersection, for a distance of 10m on the northern and southern sides of Reserve Street, and for a distance of 13m on the northwest side of Woodriff Street and 35m on the southwest side of Woodriff Street. 3. The business owner be advised of Council’s resolution. 4. In parallel with the installation of signage, the proposed provision of “No Stopping” restrictions be referred to the Roads and Maritime Services for approval under the one kilometre restriction around a nominated railway station. Should the Roads and Maritime Services not support the request, then a further report will be presented to the Local Traffic Committee.
|
5 Allen Place & Edwards Place Car Parks, Penrith - Proposed Changes to Parking Restrictions |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Allen Place & Edwards Place Car Parks, Penrith - Proposed Changes to Parking Restrictions be received. 2. The Allen Place and Edwards Place Car Parks, Penrith parking restrictions be implemented as follows: a) the Edwards Place Car Park timed parking restrictions be reduced from three-hour to two-hour parking b) the Allen Place Car Park timed parking restrictions be retained as two-hour, except for the 19 spaces (including one accessible parking bay) near the amenities block west of Woodriff Lane and the 24 spaces under the Spotlight ramp, which would be reduced from two‑hour to one-hour parking. 3. Council write to the Penrith Valley Chamber of Commerce, the Penrith CBD Corporation and individuals who provided submissions advising of Council’s resolution.
|
6 High Street, Penrith - "Triangle Park" Proposed Road Closure |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on High Street, Penrith - "Triangle Park" Proposed Road Closure be received. 2. The Committee note the information.
|
7 Sydney Street & Adelaide Street, Oxley Park - Design Plan Endorsement |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Sydney Street & Adelaide Street, Oxley Park - Design Plan Endorsement be received. 2. Consultation be conducted with the bus operator and affected residents in relation to the relocation of the bus stop. 3. Subject to no substantial objections, Design Plan AS230 (dated September 2013) for a Modified Pedestrian Refuge Island at the northern splinter island of the roundabout at the intersection of Sydney and Adelaide Streets, Oxley Park be endorsed for construction. 4. A lighting assessment be conducted for the intersection.
|
8 Hewitt Street & Shepherd Street, Colyton - Median Island Stop Treatment |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Hewitt Street & Shepherd Street, Colyton - Median Island Stop Treatment be received. 2. Consultation be conducted with residents affected by installation of “No Stopping” signage associated with the proposal. 3. Subject to no substantial objections from the consultation process, Design Plan AS 231 (dated 23/09/13) for a Median Island Stop Treatment (MIST) at the intersection of Hewitt Street and Shepherd Street, Colyton be endorsed for construction. 4. A lighting assessment be conducted.
|
9 Maxwell Street & Aspen Street, South Penrith - Proposed Provision of Roundabout |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Maxwell Street & Aspen Street, South Penrith - Proposed Provision of Roundabout be received. 2. Design Plan AM 178 (dated Sep 13) for a roundabout at the intersection of Maxwell Street and Aspen Street, South Penrith be endorsed for construction. 3. A lighting assessment be conducted. 4. Businesses in the commercial area of Aspen Street, South Penrith be advised of the proposal. 5. Provision of a “Keep Clear” pavement marking at Hilliger Road, South Penrith be referred to the Roads and Maritime Services for approval.
|
GENERAL BUSINESS
GB 1 Jordan Springs Village 4 – Endorsement of Signage & Linemarking Plan (Raised Council) |
The purpose of this report is to seek endorsement of signage and linemarking plans associated with the Jordan Springs, Village 4. The report recommends that the signage and linemarking plans be endorsed.
Council officers have received signage and linemarking plans from J Wyndham Prince Consulting Engineers for the new subdivision, being Jordan Springs Village 4 (Plan No. 9408/CC700 A dated 06/09/13, 9408/CC159 C dated 06/09/13, 9408/CC160 E dated 06/09/13, 9408/CC344 D dated 06/09/13, 9408CC426 D dated 06/09/13, 9408CC536 D dated 06/09/13, 9408/CC617 D dated 06/09/13). In summary, the plans provide a regulatory and advisory signage and linemarking scheme for the proposed residential development.
At its Ordinary Meeting on 3 April 2006, Council resolved, on the recommendation of the Local Traffic Committee, that: “….delegated authority be given to Council’s Road Network Services Engineer to sign off plans for approval, following concurrence from voting members of the Local Traffic Committee”.
In accordance with Council’s resolution, the signage and linemarking plans for the Jordan Springs Village 4 were referred to the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) and NSW Police for comments. The RMS representative requested the following amendments: · Plan CC159 - Road No. 1: “Left Lane Must Turn Left” sign - this lane should also be marked with pavement arrows. · Plan CC159 - Road No. 21: left lane is marked with left-turn pavement arrows - also need to install “Left Lane Must Turn Left” sign. · Plan CC159 - Road No. 21: please refer designer to the current RMS supplement regarding merge lane design requirements ie, Zip Lane treatment rather than merge with continuity line. · Pedestrian island detail does not show width of islands. Please ensure these are wide enough to accommodate bicyclists if located on a designated bike route or shared path access.
RECOMMENDED That the signage and linemarking plans prepared by J Wyndham Prince Consulting Engineers for the new subdivision being Jordan Springs Village 4 (Plan No. 9408/CC700 A dated 06/09/13, 9408/CC159 C dated 06/09/13, 9408/CC160 E dated 06/09/13, 9408/CC344 D dated 06/09/13, 9408CC426 D dated 06/09/13, 9408CC536 D dated 06/09/13, 9408/CC617 D dated 06/09/13), as amended in red, including the Roads and Maritime Services requirements listed in the report, be endorsed for construction. |
GB 2 Town Terrace, Glenmore Park – Design Plan Endorsement (Raised Council) |
The purpose of this report is for Council to endorse design plans for a Watts profile speed hump within Town Terrace, Glenmore Park. Town Terrace was the subject of a report to the Local Traffic Committee (LTC) on 3 November 2008, and Council, at its meeting on 10 November 2008, resolved (in part) that:
“2. A speed hump be constructed within the southern carpark on Town Terrace, Glenmore Park, to be located at the northern end of the subject section adjacent to the last carparking space. The project be entered into Council’s Traffic Facility Prioritisation process, and when the project receives priority against other listed sites, Council’s Design Co-ordinator be requested to investigate options, then a further report be submitted to the Local Traffic Committee for consideration.”
Current Situation Council’s Design Section have provided design plans for a Watts profile speed hump and associated linemarking and signage, and the design is now referred back to the LTC for endorsement prior to construction.
Council’s Design Section advises that the speed hump has been designed to best practice when considering the Roads and Maritime Services supplement, Austroads and Australian Standards requirements. The project is funded from Council’s 2013/14 Major Traffic Facilities budget. Design Plan AT79 is submitted to the LTC for endorsement. As part of the detailed design process, a lighting assessment of the intersection shall be conducted. As the speed hump adjoins the car park to the Glenmore Park Shopping centre, Centre Management will be consulted prior to its installation.
RECOMMENDED That: 1. Consultation be conducted with the Glenmore Park Shopping Centre management in relation to the speed hump installation. 2. Subject to no substantial objections, Design Plan AT79 (dated October 2013) for a Watts profile speed hump within Town Terrace, Glenmore Park be endorsed for construction. 3. A lighting assessment be conducted for the location. |
GB 3 Mulgoa Rise – Endorsement of Signage & Linemarking Plan (Raised Council) |
The purpose of this report is to seek endorsement of signage and linemarking plans associated with Mulgoa Rise Precinct D Stages 3A, 3B and 3C. The report recommends that the signage and linemarking plans be endorsed.
Council officers have received signage and linemarking plans from J Wyndham Prince Consulting Engineers for the new subdivision, being Mulgoa Rise Precinct D Stages 3A, 3B and 3C (Plan No. 898/CC660 C dated 07/02/13, 8983/CC172 B dated 24/05/13, 8983/CC604 B dated 25/01/13). In summary, the plans provide a regulatory and advisory signage and linemarking scheme for the proposed residential development.
At its Ordinary Meeting on 3 April 2006, Council resolved, on the recommendation of the Local Traffic Committee, that: “….delegated authority be given to Council’s Road Network Services Engineer to sign off plans for approval, following concurrence from voting members of the Local Traffic Committee”.
In accordance with Council’s resolution, the signage and linemarking plans for Mulgoa Rise were referred to the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) and NSW Police for comments. The RMS representative requested the following amendments:
· review the parking lane treatments - they indicate they extend around the curve.
At the time of writing the report, no comments had been received from NSW Police. As such, the Police comments will be sought at the LTC meeting.
Council officers made the minor amendment to the plans in red pen to meet the RMS requirements, together with other minor amendments. Subsequently, Council’s Development Engineers have advised the applicant of the RMS comments and associated amendments.
RECOMMENDED That the signage and linemarking plans prepared from J Wyndham Prince Consulting Engineers for the new subdivision, being Mulgoa Rise Precinct D Stages 3A, 3B and 3C (Plan No. 898/CC660 C dated 07/02/13, 8983/CC172 B dated 24/05/13, 8983/CC604 B dated 25/01/13) as amended in red, including the Roads and Maritime Services requirements listed in the report, be endorsed for construction. |
GB 4 Andromeda Drive & The Northern Road, Cranebrook – Intersection Improvements (Raised Council) |
The purpose of this report is to consider the current intersection configuration at Andromeda Drive and The Northern Road, Cranebrook. The report recommends that Council lobby the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) for investigations and upgrades on The Northern Road.
Andromeda Drive is a Local road that intersects with The Northern Road at its southernmost end. Council recently provided an intersection upgrade at this location, which included a median island stop treatment and painted island, together with changed “Give Way” priorities due to the installation of the painted island.
Representations have been received from Councillor Thain at Council’s Ordinary Meeting on 26 August 2013, requesting a memorandum regarding the cause of the accident that occurred on Andromeda Drive and The Northern Road in the week preceding the request. A memorandum was subsequently prepared and sent to all Councillors on 12 September 2013, which advised:
“We have contacted Penrith Police who have advised of a reported accident at the intersection on 20 August 2013. This accident occurred when a southbound vehicle on The Northern Road turned into Andromeda Drive and failed to see a northbound vehicle travelling on The Northern Road. The driver of the right turning vehicle advised Police that her view was obstructed by another vehicle at the intersection.
Recently, Council (through the Local Traffic Committee) has implemented changed traffic conditions at this intersection to treat an accident trend where vehicles turning right out of Andromeda Drive were being hit by through traffic on The Northern Road.
Council wrote to the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) on several occasions regarding safety at this intersection given that the predominant road is The Northern Road, which is a State Road and under the care and management of RMS. At the time, the RMS advised that given that Andromeda Drive is a local road, Council’s proposed “changed traffic conditions” for Andromeda Drive traffic was Council’s responsibility.
Council does not have the budget or resources to treat accidents like the one that occurred on 20 August that relates to the State Road.
That said, a report is being prepared for the Local Traffic Committee addressing the current (recently implemented) intersection configuration, together with a review of RMS responsibilities at this intersection.”
Council officers have recently been advised by the Principal of Xavier College that a more recent accident occurred when a student turned right from Andromeda Drive and was hit by a through vehicle on The Northern Road. At the time of writing this report, Council did not have full the details of this incident.
The concerns raised by Councillor Thain, on behalf of residents, were that drivers were confused regarding the changed priorities at the intersection due to the recent works. Prior to the works, the Australian Road Rules (ARR) gave priority to vehicles turning left from The Northern Road into Andromeda Drive over right-turning vehicles turning into Andromeda Drive. Now that the works are completed, the ARR require the priorities to be changed, where left-turning vehicles must now give way to right-turning vehicles, thus reversing the priorities.
These priorities create a contemporary intersection configuration similar to other intersections around traffic signals and, more similarly, the newly constructed intersection at the Laycock Street extension, where Laycock Street now meets Andrews Road. Since the opening of the Laycock Street and Andrews Road intersection, Council’s records indicate we have had no submissions regarding driver confusion with regard to the priorities, whilst we have received several submissions regarding confusion at the Andromeda Drive and The Northern Road intersection. Site inspections determined that the main difference between the two intersections is that the island that creates the left-turn slip lane is concrete on Andrews Road, whilst it is painted on The Northern Road. To assist drivers, the existing painted island could be replaced with concrete to provide additional delineation. Such a change may also allow the “Give Way” sign to be relocated onto the island. Works of this kind would require separate consideration and approval from the RMS, as The Northern Road is a State road under the control and management of the RMS.
Whilst Council received concerns regarding driver confusion, we have also received several submissions and criticism regarding the need to upgrade the intersection to a signalised intersection with traffic lights or a roundabout. The Northern Road is a State road under the control and management of the RMS. Council does not have the budget or resources to treat major State road intersections despite them intersecting with a Local road.
A five-year accident analysis was undertaken using available data from January 2008 to December 2012, which indicated there have been eight accidents at the intersection during that time. This report recommends that Council write to the RMS and request they review the current intersection configuration including, but not limited to, vehicle speeds and the existing speed limit on The Northern Road, signage, linemarking and the need for traffic signals, a roundabout or an amendment to the current intersection configuration.
RECOMMENDED That:
1. Council request approval from the Roads and Maritime Services to replace the existing painted island on The Northern Road at the intersection with Andromeda Drive, Cranebrook with a concrete island. 2. Subject to Roads and Maritime Services approval, the existing painted island on The Northern Road at the intersection with Andromeda Drive, Cranebrook be replaced with a concrete island, with funding to be considered from Council’s Urgent Local Traffic Facilities Program. 3. Council write to the Roads and Maritime Services and request they consider the provision of traffic signals or intersection upgrades at the intersection of The Northern Road and Andromeda Drive, Cranebrook. 4. Councillor Thain be advised of Council’s resolution. |
GB 5 The Northern Road/Bringelly Road, South Penrith – Request for Provision of Left-Turn Lane (Raised Councillor Hitchen - Representative for the Member for Penrith) |
Councillor Hitchen, representative for the Member for Penrith, raised concerns about traffic congestion on The Northern Road, South Penrith, due to vehicles waiting to turn right into Bringelly Road. It was reported that right-turn vehicles queue beyond the right-turn lane and into the through lane, particularly during the AM peak. The Northern Road is a State road under the control and management of the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS). As such, the RMS will be requested to consider the length of queue for right-turning vehicles from The Northern Road into Bringelly Road, together with an additional left-turn lane for northbound vehicles on The Northern Road to turn into Maxwell Street.
RECOMMENDED That Council write to the Roads and Maritime Services requesting that they conduct a review of capacity at the right-turn from The Northern Road into Bringelly Road, South Penrith and consider an additional dedicated left-turn lane for northbound vehicles from The Northern Road onto Maxwell Street. |
GB 6 Reserve Street Car Park, Penrith – Request for Re-sealing (Raised Councillor Cornish) |
Councillor Cornish requested that the car park located on the corner of Reserve Street and Woodriff Street, Penrith, be resealed and linemarked to allow for better use of the facility and maximising car parking spaces. RECOMMENDED That Council’s City Works Manager be requested to investigate this matter. |
GB 7 Variable Message Signs – Request to Obtain Signs for Council Use (Raised Councillor Cornish) |
Councillor Cornish requested that Council look into obtaining a variable message sign(s) to publicise various Council events. RECOMMENDED That Council’s City Works Manager be requested to investigate this matter. |
GB 8 Bus Services in Penrith – Transition to New Provider (Raised Busways) |
The Busways representative advised that Busways have commenced bus services in the Penrith Local Government Area and taken over from Westbus with no major issues in the first few weeks of service. RECOMMENDED That the Committee note the information. |
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed, the time being 10:35am.
That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 14 October, 2013 be adopted.
|
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
Policy Review Committee MEETING
HELD ON 14 October, 2013
PRESENT
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM (arrived 7:06pm) and Councillors Bernard Bratusa, Prue Car (arrived 7:05pm), Kevin Crameri OAM, Marcus Cornish, Greg Davies (arrived 7:05pm), Jackie Greenow OAM, Tricia Hitchen, Karen McKeown, John Thain (arrived 7:05pm) and Michelle Tormey.
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Leave of Absence was previously granted to Councillor Mark Davies for the period 14 October 2013 to 25 October 2013 inclusive.
APOLOGIES |
Apologies were received for Councillors Ben Goldfinch and Maurice Girotto. |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Policy Review Committee Meeting - 9 September 2013 |
The minutes of the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 9 September 2013 were confirmed. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no declarations of interest.
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
Corporate Planning Coordinator, Tanya Jackson introduced the report and invited Stuart Reeve, Managing Director of Micromex Research to give a presentation. |
RECOMMENDED that the information contained in the report on Community Survey 2013 be received. |
Outcome 1 - We can work close to home
1 Penrith Business Alliance Limited (PBA) 2013-2014 Business Plan Assistant General Manager, Craig Butler introduced the report and invited Paul Brennan, Chairman of the PBA and Ben Artup, Manager Industry and Investment to give a presentation. Councillor
Prue Car left the meeting, the time being 7:56pm.
|
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Penrith Business Alliance Limited (PBA) 2013-2014 Business Plan be received. 2. Council agree to the Penrith Business Alliance Business Plan for 2013-2014 and provision of the amount of $516,000 (plus GST) to be paid in two separate instalments of $258,000 (plus GST) each, in October 2013 and March 2014, in accordance with the provisions of the Deed of Agreement. 3. Council defer consideration of the Penrith Business Alliance’s request for an advance of $200,000 from the 2014-15 budget to cover operational expenses from July to October 2014 until early in the 2014 calendar year to coincide with negotiations on the new deed of agreement with the Penrith Business Alliance for its continued operation. 4. A separate report be submitted to Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 25 November 2013 tabling the Penrith Business Alliance’s Financial Plan once the draft Financial Plan has been considered by the Penrith Business Alliance Board. 5. A letter be sent to the Chairperson of the Penrith Business Alliance, expressing Council’s appreciation to the Board for their work over the past year.
|
Councillor Karen McKeown left the meeting, the time being 8:19pm.
Councillor Karen McKeown returned to the meeting, the time being 8:21pm.
Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places
4 Neighbourhood Renewal Program - North St Marys and Werrington Neighbourhood Action Plans Councillor Jim Aitken OAM left the meeting, the time being 8:22pm. Place
Manager, Jeni Pollard introduced the report and invited Acting Coordinator
Neighbourhood Renewal, Heather Chaffey to give a presentation. Councillor
Kevin Crameri OAM left the meeting, the time being 8:30pm. Councillor
Bernard Bratusa left the meeting, the time being 8:53pm. |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Neighbourhood Renewal Program - North St Marys and Werrington Neighbourhood Action Plans be received. 2. Council endorse the North St Marys Neighbourhood Action Plan 2013 and the Werrington Neighbourhood Action Plan 2013 as provided in Appendix 2 and 3 of this report.
|
Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth
2 Construction Specification for Civil Works (Working Draft) Councillor
John Thain left the meeting, the time being 8:59pm. Councillors Michelle Tormey and Tricia Hitchen left the meeting, the time being 9:06pm and did not return. |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Engineering Construction Specification for Civil Works (Working Draft) be received. 2. Council endorse the Engineering Construction Specification for Civil Works (Working Draft) for the purpose of exhibition and consultation with the industry. 3. Council endorse minor amendments to be made to Council’s Engineering Guidelines for Subdivision and Other Development - Part 1: Design to ensure consistency between the two documents. 4. The Engineering Construction Specification for Civil Works (Working Draft) be applied to civil works associated with Development Applications lodged after Council’s endorsement of the document. 5. At the conclusion of the exhibition a report be presented to Council for adoption of the final document. 6. References to the Engineering Construction Specification for Civil Works (Working Draft) be updated in the next version of Council’s Development Control Plan. 7. The final specification be reviewed by Engineering Services and City Works periodically with only substantial amendments to be reported to Council. |
3 Stormwater Drainage for Building Developments (Working Draft) |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Stormwater Drainage for Building Developments (Working Draft) be received. 2. Council endorse the Stormwater Drainage for Building Development (Working Draft) for the purpose of exhibition and consultation with the industry. 3. The Stormwater Drainage for Building Developments (Working Draft) be applied to civil works associated with Development Applications lodge after Council’s endorsement of the document. 4. References and information in Penrith Development Control Plans 2006 & 2010 and Council’s Guidelines for Engineering Works for Subdivisions and Developments Part 1: Design be updated to be consistent with the adoption of Stormwater Drainage for Building Development (Working Draft). 5. At the conclusion of the exhibition a report be presented to Council for adoption of the final document.
|
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Draft Policy on the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Councillors be received. 2. Council advertise for 28 days a public notice of its intention to adopt the amended Policy on the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Councillors. 3. A further report be presented to Council at the conclusion of the exhibition period. |
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9:09pm.
That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 14 October, 2013 be adopted.
|
Item Page
Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth
1 Development Application 12/0989 Residential attached dual occupancy (No. 46) Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook Applicant: NSW Land & Housing Corporation; Owner: Aboriginal House Office C/- NSW Land & Housing Corporation
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter. 1
2 Development Application 13/0863 Fernhill - Race Day Lots 10 & 11 (No. 1041-1117) Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa Applicant: Brenda Tripp; Owner: Angas Securities Limited
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter. 25
Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places
3 Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Community Cultural Grants Program 2013-14 63
4 Tender Reference 13/14-07 – Construction Work for Amenities Block at Blair Oval, St Marys 78
Outcome 5 - We care about our environment
5 Floodplain Management Association 54th Annual Conference - 20 to 23 May 2014 85
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
6 Audit Committee 91
7 2012-13 Financial Statements 102
8 Pecuniary Interest Returns 104
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 1 - We can work close to home
There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth
Item Page
1 Development Application 12/0989 Residential attached dual occupancy (No. 46) Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook Applicant: NSW Land & Housing Corporation; Owner: Aboriginal House Office C/- NSW Land & Housing Corporation
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter. 1
2 Development Application 13/0863 Fernhill - Race Day Lots 10 & 11 (No. 1041-1117) Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa Applicant: Brenda Tripp; Owner: Angas Securities Limited
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter. 25
1 |
Development Application 12/0989 Residential attached dual occupancy (No. 46) Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook Applicant: NSW Land & Housing Corporation; Owner: Aboriginal House Office C/- NSW Land & Housing Corporation |
|
Compiled by: Hannah Van De Werff, Environmental Planner
Authorised by: Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager
Outcome |
We plan for our future growth |
Strategy |
Facilitate development that encourages a range of housing types |
Service Activity |
Delivery timely assessment, regulation and certification of development and building work in accordance with statutory requirements |
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.
Executive Summary
Council is in receipt of a Crown Development Application from the NSW Land and Housing Corporation for the construction of an attached dual occupancy at the corner of Ironbark Drive and Bottlebrush Drive, Cranebrook. The proposal involves the construction of a single storey two x two bedroom attached dual occupancy on a vacant parcel of land. The design features dual frontage with Unit 1 orientating to Ironbark Drive and Unit 2 orientating to Bottlebrush Drive. Unit 2 has been universally designed to facilitate accessibility.
The application seeks to vary the rear setback development standard prescribed under Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Lands), which is 4 metres. The rear boundary setback for the new dwelling (as measured from the southern boundary) is 1.2 metres. The application is supported by an objection to the development standard under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 (SEPP 1).
In accordance with the reporting procedures required by the Department of Planning, the matter is forwarded to Council for determination. The report recommends that the SEPP 1 objection be supported and the development application be approved subject to conditions of consent.
Pursuant to Clause 89(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the applicant has agreed to the proposed conditions of development consent for this application.
The matter was brought before Council at its Ordinary Meeting on 22 July 2013 and the determination was deferred subject to a site meeting with relevant stakeholders to clarify the protocols for tenancy management. NSW Land and Housing Corporation did not attend the meeting however provided a Tenancy Management Statement which has been attached to this report (See Appendix 1). Additionally, to respond to individual property owner concerns a revised site plan has been provided to maximise privacy between adjoining dwellings.
Statutory Considerations
The subject site is owned by the Aboriginal Housing Office (Care of NSW Land and Housing Corporation). The site was previously occupied by a single dwelling which no longer exists on the site.
Clause 40 of SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 prescribes circumstances where development consent is not required for Land and Housing Corporation development. The proposal satisfies relevant standards of this Clause however the proponent has elected to obtain development consent from Council.
Clause 89 (1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (‘The Act’) states that a consent authority (other than a Minister) must not:
(a) refuse its consent to a Crown development application, except with the approval of the Minister, or
(b) impose a condition on its consent to a Crown development application, except with the approval of the applicant or the Minister.
Furthermore, subclause (2A) states:
Crown development application for which the consent authority is a council must not be referred to the Minister unless it is first referred to the applicable regional panel.
Therefore according to the Act, if Council motion to refuse the subject application, the application is required to be referred to the Western Sydney Division of the Joint Regional Planning Panel (JRPP) and the Minister for approval of its decision.
Background
A pre-lodgement meeting was not held for the lodgement of this DA.
On 28 September 2012, NSW Land and Housing Corporation lodged the subject application with Council. A Preliminary assessment of the application identified several issues with the development and in response the applicant lodged amended plans and a SEPP 1 variation to the rear setback control (final plan provided 5 May 2013).
On 22 July 2013, the subject application was reported to Council for determination, Council motioned for the matter to be deferred until such time that a meeting could be arranged between Council, the Department of Housing, Bart Bassett, State Member for Londonderry, and residents to allow for clear protocols to be put in place should future issues arise, and a copy of those protocols be included when the matter is brought back to Council.
On Monday 12 August 2013, Stuart Ayres, State Member for Penrith, all North Ward Councillors, Council assessment officers and residents attended a site meeting. NSW Land and Housing Corporation were invited to attend the meeting and while the invitation was initially accepted, representatives were not present on site for the meeting.
Discussion focused on the developments performance against relevant planning instruments, its integration within the existing character of the area, privacy implications to adjoining properties and management protocols for future tenants. Council officers were able to respond to the majority of the concerns raised however matters of future tenancy were deferred to NSW Land and Housing Corporation in meeting minutes (provided to NSW Land and Housing Corporation on Thursday 15 August 2013).
In the correspondence dated 15 August 2013, it was formally requested that despite the matter not being a planning consideration (under Section 79C of the Act), that a tenancy management plan be provided to Council to appease community concerns, facilitate understanding of management protocols and respond to the matters raised at Councils Ordinary Meeting as well as the meeting held on site.
NSW Land and Housing Corporation requested that the requirement of a management plan be dealt with as a condition of development consent however as the applicant is not required to obtain a Construction Certificate for the development, Council officers were not satisfied that the provision of the plan could be regulated by Council and therefore negotiated preliminary tenancy management commitments be provided prior to the matter being brought before Council.
On 18 September 2013, information was provided to Council which outlined potential types of households which would be suitable based on the size of the units and also contact details for Aboriginal Housing Office should issues arise as part of the future tenanting of the units. A copy of the information is attached to this report (See Appendix No. 1).
Additionally, to respond to the minuted concerns from the neighbours, a revised site plan was provided to Council to clarify the type of fencing to the southern and eastern property boundaries. NSW Land and Housing also indicated they would accept conditions of development consent to reduce the impact to adjoining property owners. Such conditions include the reduction in feature tree planting to the south eastern corner of the site, the removal of one palm tree to the south western corner of the site and the removal of the extended area of concrete slab to the north eastern boundary to prevent overlooking to the adjoining property.
On 2 October 2013, invitation letters were sent to surrounding residents to attend an Ordinary meeting at Council on 21 October 2013, where the application will be reported for determination. The letter also provided a copy of the tenancy management plan and consultation has been undertaken with adjoining property owners regarding the revised site plan.
Site and Surrounds
The site is situated on the corner of Ironbark Drive and Bottlebrush Drive, Cranebrook (see Locality Plan - Appendix No. 3). The site has a 12.3 metre frontage to Ironbark Drive and a 39.9 metre frontage to Bottlebrush Drive, with a 5.9 metre splay corner at the intersection of these frontages. The site has a total area of 827m2.
The site is presently vacant with grass cover and a small group of palm trees to the north western corner. All but one of these trees will be retained as part of the development. Development in the area is predominantly low density residential consisting of a combination of single and two-storey dwellings.
The site falls towards the southwest corner of the site, with a cross fall of 3.16 metres.
There is one street tree along the Ironbark Drive frontage. The proposed driveway does not encroach on the tree however a condition of consent is recommended to require tree protection measures to be employed to secure the retention of this tree.
The Proposed Development
The proposed development includes:
· Construction of a single storey attached dual occupancy. Unit 1 orientates to Ironbark Drive and Unit 2 orientates to Bottlebrush Drive. Each unit will contain two bedrooms and a single bathroom with an internal laundry which features through access to the private open space. The dwellings will each have a single lock up garage and feature separate access via each street frontage.
· Unit 2 has been universally designed for accessibility. The parking area has ramped at grade access to the entry of the unit.
· The site will feature retaining walls to the southern and eastern boundaries and the development includes a 1.8 metre boundary fence to those boundaries.
· Both dwellings are provided with the opportunity for stacked car parking in the driveways.
· Unit 1 is setback 1 metre from the side boundary and 8 metres from Ironbark Drive (front setback).
· Unit 2 is setback 1.2m from the rear boundary and 3.5 metres from Bottlebrush drive. The proposed single garage and stacked parking area for Unit 2 is located within the rear setback of the site.
· Private open space for both dwellings is provided to the south eastern corner of the site and is separated by retaining walls, fencing and a combination of landscape features and low lying shrubs.
· Cut and fill (max 500mm) and retaining walls are required to provide level access to the private open space of each unit.
Appendix No. 2 of this report provides details of the floor plans, elevations, landscape and site plan submitted with the application.
The Development Application has been accompanied by the following related documents:
· Architectural Plans – Hely Horne Perry Architects & Project Managers
· Landscape Concept Plan – Hely Horne Perry Architects & Project Managers
· Hydraulic Stormwater Details – Wallis and Spratt Pty Ltd C/- Hely Horne Perry Architects & Project Managers
· Statement of Environmental Effects and SEPP 1 Variation – NSW Land & Housing Corporation
· BASIX Certificate & ABSA Certificates
· Schedule of External Finishes
Planning Assessment
The development has been assessed in accordance with the matters for consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended) (EP&A Act) and, having regard to those matters, the following issues have been identified for further consideration.
1. Section 79C(1)(a)(i) – Any Environmental Planning Instrument
Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River (SREP 20)
The development has been assessed with regard to the general planning considerations and the specific planning policies and recommended strategies of SREP 20. The development provides for stormwater to be disposed to Council’s existing stormwater system in the street. Conditions of development consent are recommended to ensure that appropriate soil erosion and sediment control measures are provided during construction of the development. The proposal satisfies the considerations under SREP 20.
State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009
Pursuant to Clause 6 of the SEPP, residential development on land owned by the NSW Land and Housing Corporation is taken to be affordable rental housing pursuant to SEPP (Affordable Rental housing) 2009.
Clause 14 – Standards that cannot be used to refuse consent
Division 1 (In-fill Affordable Housing) is applicable to the subject development and Clause 14 prescribes the minimum standards for affordable housing and therefore matters to which the development cannot be refused, provided the development satisfies those standards.
The table below outlines the developments performance against the standards prescribed under Clause 14 of the SEPP:
Standard |
Requirement
|
Complies |
Minimum site area |
450sqm |
Yes
|
Landscaped Area |
35sqm per dwelling |
Yes
|
Deep soil zone |
Sufficient soil depth to support the growth of trees and shrubs on an area of not less than 15 per cent of the site area (the deep soil zone), and each area forming part of the deep soil zone has a minimum dimension of 3 metres, and if practicable, at least two-thirds of the deep soil zone is located at the rear of the site area. |
Yes
|
Solar access |
living rooms and private open spaces for a minimum of 70 per cent of the dwellings of the development receive a minimum of 3 hours direct sunlight between 9am and 3pm in mid-winter |
Yes |
Parking |
0.5 parking spaces are provided for each dwelling containing 2 bedrooms |
Yes |
Dwelling Size |
70 square metres in the case of a dwelling having 2 bedrooms |
Yes |
Clause 15 – Design Requirements
Clause 15 states that a consent authority must not consent to development to which this Division applies unless it has taken into consideration the provisions of the Seniors Living Policy: Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development published by the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources in March 2004.
The Seniors Living Policy: Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development outlines design principles which should be incorporated new housing developments to maintain high level of amenity for both new and existing residents.
An assessment of the development against the relevant principles of design are set out in Appendix 4 of this report.
Based on that assessment, Council can be satisfied the development appropriately responds to the design criteria of the Seniors Living Policy and therefore satisfied the key elements of designed for dual occupancy development.
Clause 40 Development may be carried out without consent
Clause 40 of the SEPP prescribes circumstances where development consent is not required for certain types of development, including that which is for the Land and Housing Corporation, and the proposal satisfies relevant standards of this Clause.
This proposal satisfies the SEPP provisions and as such does not necessitate development consent from Council however the proponent has elected to seek consent from Council under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as opposed to self assessment under Part 5 of the Act.
State Environmental Planning Policy No.1 - Development Standards (SEPP 1)
The applicant seeks a variation to the minimum rear boundary setback of 4 metres under Clause 12(4) of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Land) LEP 1998. The development proposes a 1.2 metre rear boundary setback to the southern boundary. Council’s requirement relating to the minimum rear boundary setback is a development standard and Council is therefore only able to consider a request to vary the standard under the provisions of SEPP 1.
SEPP 1 aims to allow flexibility in the application of development standards where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary. The NSW Department of Infrastructure and Planning provides Council with a guide to assessing applications under SEPP 1 with reference given to the principles established by the NSW Land and Environment Court. This application has been assessed with regard to these principles.
This application has been accompanied by an objection to the development standard under SEPP 1. The objection provides the following arguments in support of the variation:
· “The development satisfies the objectives of the standard. The objectives, as outlined under Clause 12(1) of LEP 1998, are:
(a) To ensure a site-responsive development at a scale which is compatible with existing housing in the locality by controlling visual impacts relating to height and bulk; and
(b) To minimise the impact of loss of privacy, overshadowing and loss of views; and
(c) To achieve an appropriate separation between buildings and site boundaries and preserve private open space corridors along rear fence lines; and
(d) To protect and enhance the environmental features, which are characteristic of each of the residential zones, by requiring sufficient space on-site for effective landscaping and on-site stormwater detention.
· The rear boundary setback will be used for the purpose of landscaped area (as defined under LEP 1998). There is presently limited continuity of landscaped areas along the rear boundaries of nearby properties. This is confirmed with aerial photography which reveals a number of outbuildings, dwellings, swimming pools and paved areas in rear boundary setbacks.
· The non complying element of the structure located within the rear setback is the garage. This is a non habitable portion of the building and it does not impact on the privacy of adjoining residents, or result in unreasonable overshadowing.
· Whilst the development is contrary to the minimum rear setback requirement, it complies with the requirements for minimum landscaped area control prescribed under Clause 12 of the LEP.
· Strict compliance with the objective would hinder the attainment of the objects of the Act as it would not encourage the development of land for social welfare of the community and consequently reduce the provision of affordable housing.
· The design of the development, being single storey and staggered with high quality design features such as orientation to each street frontage and maximum setbacks to the street, provides a positive contribution to the streetscape. The garages are appropriately positioned to minimise privacy implications.
· Strict compliance with the standard to achieve a 4 metre setback to the southern boundary would reduce the front setback to Ironbark Drive. A variation to Clause 12 of the LEP is considered more appropriate to maintain a consistent setback pattern to Ironbark Drive and ensure the development compliments the character of the area. In addition, the proposed building footprint provides sufficient separation to enable the retention of vegetation on the north western corner of the site, which maintains the landscape character of the area.
The proposed dual occupancy is to be used as affordable rental housing, administered through the Aboriginal Housing office, on behalf of the NSW Land & Housing Corporation. The development accords with the Objects under Clause 5 of the Act to encourage the provision and maintenance of affordable housing. Therefore based on the provision of Clause 5 and the arguments provided by the applicant; the SEPP 1 objection is accepted and has demonstrated that full compliance with the minimum rear boundary setback requirement is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case.
Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Land) (LEP 1998)
The site is zoned Residential 2(b) – Low Density under the provisions of LEP 1998. Dual occupancy development is permissible in this zone with development consent. The relevant sections of LEP 1998 are discussed below.
|
Standard |
Proposed |
Compliance |
Clause 11 Minimum allotment size |
650m2 for attached dual occupancy |
827m2 |
Yes |
Clause 12(3) Building envelope |
1.8 metres at side boundary with 450 angle inwards |
The building encroaches beyond the nominated building envelope. |
No. See comment below. |
Clause 12(3) Maximum external wall height |
6.5 metres |
4 metres (max) |
Yes
|
Clause 12(3) Landscaping |
50% |
57.29% (473.81sqm) |
Yes. |
Clause 12(4) Rear setback |
4 metres (for a single storey development) |
1.2 metre to the southern boundary along the garage. |
No. SEPP 1 application submitted. See previous discussion in this report. |
Building envelope
Proposed Unit 2 encroaches beyond the nominated building envelope with a portion of the walls (approximately 1.53 metres at the southern wall of Unit 2 and 1.3 metres at the western wall of Unit 1) and roof space provided outside the envelope. Clause 12(6) allows for such a variation as follows:
Despite any other provisions of this clause, the council may consent to a building which is not wholly within the relevant building envelope or contravenes the maximum wall height control if, in the opinion of the council, the application demonstrates that a variation to those controls is necessary to improve the design, external appearance or utility of the proposed building.
In considering the above clause and the area of non compliance it is recommended the variation be permitted due to the following:
i. The area of non compliance applies to the single garage for each unit which contributes to the function and amenity of the residential units.
ii. Any overshadowing impacts to adjoining properties will not compromise their enjoyment of solar access to the principal open space. Shadows cast will primarily impact on the outbuildings (carport and garages) and street interface which is considered acceptable.
iii.The proposal is consistent with the character of the local area where there is presently limited continuity of landscaped areas along boundaries of nearby properties.
The design of the building will make a positive contribution to the character of the streetscape whilst providing good utility and amenity for future residents. The proposed variation is minor in nature, with the encroachment of eaves beyond the building envelope provided for in DCP 2006. For these reasons, the proposed variation to the nominated building envelope is supported.
Clause 13 - Provisions for environmental performance in development generally
Clause 13 of LEP 1998 makes provision for environmental performance, with controls for dual occupancy development relating to environmental noise and stormwater. The development satisfies the requirements of this clause.
Clause 14 - Provision for design principles in development generally
Clause 14 of LEP 1998 provides design principles that Council must consider in its assessment of a development application. These are as follows:
(a) reinforcement and protection of local topography and setting,
(b) reflection of the forms, features or qualities of traditional residential neighbourhoods across Penrith local government area,
(c) consistency or compatibility with the scale, design and amenity of neighbouring development,
(d) contribution to attractive streetscapes through the diversity of building forms and landscaped areas that can be seen from any public place nearby,
(e) provision for contemporary standards of amenity within each dwelling and the associated private open space,
(f) preservation and enhancement of any significant vista that currently might be available from a public place nearby.
The application satisfies these considerations.
2. Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) – Any Development Control Plan
Penrith Development Control Plan 2006
Penrith Development Control Plan (DCP) 2006 Part 4 Section 4.3 – Dual Occupancy is applicable to the site. A checklist of compliance is provided as Appendix 3 to this report. The following matters from the DCP are noted for discussion.
Rear Setbacks and Building Envelope
The requirements for rear boundary setbacks and building envelopes contained in DCP 2006 are consistent with those contained in LEP 1998. Commentary on these areas of non-compliance has been provided previously in this report.
Courtyard Fencing and Corner Sites & Frontages
The development is located on a corner site. DCP 2006 provides controls relating to corner sites and frontages. The development complies with the relevant controls for attached dual occupancy’s on corner lots in regard to:
§ Front Setbacks: 5.5 metres to Ironbark Drive and 3.5 metres to Bottlebrush Drive which is the secondary street frontage;
§ Location of fencing: no fencing is proposed forward of the building line and the provision of internal courtyard fencing, retaining walls and privacy screens maximises privacy internally and to adjoining properties;
§ Landscape Embellishment: appropriate landscape specie selection to the to street interface to embellish the site as well as the retention of existing vegetation to the splay area of the site;
§ Streetscape, dwelling orientation and visual appearance: the provision of high quality construction materials of varying schedules and colour selections is provided.
3. Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of the Development
Built and Natural Environment
The development is sympathetic to the streetscape in both Ironbark Drive and Bottlebrush Drive and provides an upgrade to the front elevation of the existing dwelling and the continuance of existing setbacks in the street. The development provides for appropriate separation between dwellings and does not detract from the amenity of neighbouring properties. The provision of high quality landscaping will serve to enhance the development and the overall built and natural environment in the locality.
The development satisfies Council requirements for the provision of car parking and traffic generated by the development can be accommodated by the capacity of the road network in the locality.
The development satisfies sustainable development principles through commitments including a rainwater tank for each unit, improved thermal comfort through the insulation installations, maximising provision for natural ventilation and use of alternative energy sources such as gas cooking appliances. The commitments proposed will be secured through conditions of development consent which require BASIX installations in accordance with certificate number 421922M.
The site has adequate utility services & infrastructure. Appropriate controls for the disposal of stormwater, in addition to soil erosion and sediment control measures are recommended as conditions of consent and will ensure the development does not have an adverse impact on the natural environment.
Social and Economic
The development facilitates the provision of affordable housing and contributes to the Penrith Regions housing diversity. It provides opportunity for community inclusion for its future residents, in an area which is accessible to support services and employment and therefore the development is likely to offer social advantages to its tenants.
The development has been designed having regard to the planning provisions which apply to the land.
4. Section 79C(1)(c) – The Suitability of the Site for the Development
In view of the assessment, the proposal makes efficient use of the land for the purpose of affordable rental housing. Based on the design merits of the application and its integration with the character of the surrounding area, Council can be satisfied that the site is suitable for the proposed development.
5. Section 79C(1)(d) – Any Submissions made in relation to the Development
(i) Internal Referrals
The application was referred to the following departments and their comments have formed part of the assessment:
Referral Body |
Comments Received |
Building Surveyor |
No objection, subject to the imposition of standard conditions. |
Development Engineer |
No objection, subject to the imposition of standard conditions. |
(ii) Community Consultation
In accordance with Section 2.7 (Notification and Advertising) of Penrith Development Control Plan 2006, the proposed development was notified to nearby and adjoining residents and occupiers.
The application was placed on public exhibition between 4 October 2012 and 18 October 2012. Council notified 11 residences in the area and received seven submissions.
The issues raised in the submissions are summarised in the following table:
Issue Raised |
Response |
Antisocial behaviour, Neighbours Safety and Security and Tenancy Management |
Issues regarding the well-being and safety of neighbours have been raised with the NSW Land & Housing Corporation for consideration and the corporation has acknowledged receipt of the concerns. This is discussed earlier in this report. The development poses greater benefit to the public housing sector and is designed so that it can sympathetically contribute to increased social housing stock within the Greater Sydney Metropolitan Region. Having regard to the heads of consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the development is satisfactory and any adverse impacts arising from the built form have been minimised through appropriate architectural design.
Notwithstanding, to provide a response to the social implications raised in the submissions; the corporation have their own procedures for handling their tenancies and associated complaints and the residents of the property are bound to a tenancy agreement to which they are required to maintain the property in a suitable manner. Tenants have support workers and client service managers who are available to facilitate good tenancy management.
|
Privacy Impacts |
A 1.8m high fence and retaining wall to the eastern boundary provides screening. Details of the proposed fencing have been shown in the section plan prepared by the applicants’ architect. Furthermore, the active living areas of the units are separated by non habitable outbuildings. Amended plans have been provided to include a privacy screen be erected to the edge of the patio and extend to the property boundary to Unit 1 to safeguard against the perception viewing between adjoining properties could occur. Furthermore landscaping is proposed adjacent to the property boundaries which will also prevent opportunity for cross viewing. |
Overshadowing |
A shadow diagram has been prepared by the applicant and demonstrates compliance with the DCP requirements in regard to solar access, which is accepted by Council officers.
|
Overdevelopment of the site |
Despite the non compliance with the rear setback, the development satisfies the minimum landscaped area and building height limitation of the LEP. Furthermore, the site area is well in excess of the minimum under LEP 1998 for an attached dual occupancy development. |
Development is inconsistent with the character of the locality |
The report addresses this issue.
|
Retaining wall acting as a foot hold to allow residents to look over fences to the adjoining properties. |
Privacy has already been addressed above. (See the section which addresses ‘Privacy Impacts’) |
As discussed in the preface of this report, further community consultation has been undertaken with the surrounding neighbours regarding the development and future management of the tenants. Information has been provided by the applicant to ensure that every effort will be undertaken to appropriately manage tenants and such details is provided in Appendix 1 of this report.
Mr Stuart Ayres, State Member for Penrith, All North Ward Councillors and Council officers have expressed their commitment to facilitate communication between the NSW Land and Housing Corporation, Aboriginal Housing Office and the community if and where management issues arise.
6. Section 79C(1)(e) – The Public Interest
The proposal offers a development that is compatible with the existing streetscape and provides high quality design features. It is acknowledged that the notification process has given rise to concerns in regard to future social implications, and where possible, the development assessment process has been undertaken having regard to the matters raised.
To address the future management of the tenancies, Council has consulted with the applicant to ensure there is mutual recognition of the issues raised and it is envisaged that NSW Land & Housing Corporation will address tenancy management and respond to the concerns if and where required. When considering the merits of design, the justifications forward from the applicant and the provisions of the Act, it has been demonstrated that the development is consistent with the broader interest of the public as it delivers additional yields of affordable housing stock and makes efficient use of the land without compromising the amenity of its users and adjoining neighbours.
Section 94 Contributions
The following Section 94 Contribution Plans apply to dual occupancy developments:
· Penrith City Council Development Contributions Plan Cultural Facilities
· Penrith City District Open Space Facilities Development Contributions Plan
· Penrith City Council Section 94 Plan Footpath Construction in the Established Residential Areas of the City
· Penrith City Local Open Space Development Contributions Plan
However, in accordance with the Development Contribution Practice Note (issued by NSW Department of Planning in December 2006) the levying of contributions for the purpose of Affordable Housing is prohibited.
Therefore, the above Section 94 contributions do not apply to this particular development application.
Conclusion
The proposed development has been designed with regard to individual street frontages and provides a positive contribution to the existing streetscape in both Ironbark Drive and Bottlebrush Drive. The development satisfies the provisions of the relevant planning documents, with appropriate justification being provided for departures from the building envelope and rear setback requirements with the LEP. With regard to the rear boundary setback, the objection to the development standard under SEPP 1 has demonstrated that compliance with the standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case and is therefore supported.
The development provides for additional affordable rental housing in the locality. It has been demonstrated that the site is suitable for the proposed development and the matters raised as part of community consultation have been addressed in the body of this report.
It is therefore recommended that the SEPP 1 objection be supported and that the development application be approved subject to the attached conditions.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application 12/0989 Residential attached dual occupancy (No. 46) Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook be received. 2. The State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 objection to the 4 metre rear set back be supported for the reasons outlined in this report. 3. Development Application DA12/0989 for the construction of two x two bedroom attached dual occupancy at Lot 319 in DP231310 (No.46 Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook) be approved subject to the following conditions: 3.1 Standard Conditions B004 Dust B005 Mud/Soil D001 Implement Sediment & erosion control D005 No fill without prior approval D006 No filling without prior approval D009 Covering of waste storage area D010 Appropriate disposal of excavated or other waste G003 Section 73 – Sydney Water G004 Integral energy G005 Rainwater tank - plumbing H039 Rainwater tank pumps H041 Hours of work (other devt) K202 Roads act – minor roadworks K208 Stormwater Discharge – Minor Development K209 Stormwater Concept Plan L001 General Landscaping L002 Landscaping Construction L005 Planting of plant material L006 Australian Standard requirements for planting and landscaping L007 Tree protection measures P001 Costs P002 Fees Associated with Council Land Q010 BASIX Certificate
3.2 Special Conditions 3.2.1. The provision of high feature trees (Melaleuca and Angophora) located in the south portion of the site shall be revised to comprise of Grevillea and Lomandra (as identified in red) on the stamped approved Landscape Concept Plan.
3.2.2. The existing palm tree to the south of the site shall be removed as identified in red, on the stamped approved Landscape Concept Plan. , 3.2.3. The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the following plans:
and stamped approved by Council and any supporting information received with the application, except as may be amended by the following conditions.
3.2.4. The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia.
3.2.5. All aspects of the building design shall comply with the applicable performance requirements of the Building Code of Australia.
3.2.6. Prior to the Occupation of the development, the Land and Housing Corporation shall ensure that all works within the road reserve have been inspected and approved by Penrith City Council.
|
1. View |
Tenancy Management Statement |
2 Pages |
Appendix |
2. View |
Architectual Plans |
5 Pages |
Appendix |
3. View |
Locality Map |
1 Page |
Appendix |
4. View |
Urban Design Guideline Assessment |
1 Page |
Appendix |
2 |
Development Application 13/0863 Fernhill - Race Day Lots 10 & 11 (No. 1041-1117) Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa Applicant: Brenda Tripp; Owner: Angas Securities Limited |
|
Compiled by: Belinda Borg, Senior Environmental Planner
Authorised by: Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager
Outcome |
We plan for our future growth |
Strategy |
Facilitate development that encourages a range of housing types |
Service Activity |
Delivery timely assessment, regulation and certification of development and building work in accordance with statutory requirements |
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.
Executive Summary
Council is in receipt of a Development Application from Brenda Tripp, which seeks approval for the purpose of conducting a Picnic Horse Racing Event, to be held on 9 November 2013 at 1041 – 1187 Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa.
The proposal involves the use of site to host a one day Picnic Horse Racing Event on 9 November 2013 with a maximum of 20,000 ticketed spectators in attendance.
The Development Application was submitted as an integrated application and the Heritage Council of New South Wales was consulted as a part of the referral process. The subject site is zoned E2 Environmental Conservation and E3 Environmental Management under Penrith Local Environmental Plan (LEP) 2010. The proposed Picnic Horse Racing Event is defined as a recreational facility (outdoor) and is permissible on the site as a temporary use in accordance with Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 clause 2.8. The Local Police Command, the State Emergency Service, Western Sydney Area Health Service, and NSW Ambulance were notified of the proposal and provided no objection to the application.
In response to advertisements in the local papers, widespread notification to residents within a 2km radius of the development site and public exhibition of the application, a total of eight (8) submissions were received. The submissions raised concerns regarding traffic, road diversions along Farm Road, provision of bus services, site suitability, noise impacts, helicopter flight plan, adequacy of the existing race track to support the event, adverse impacts on the residents of Mulgoa and advertising of event prior to Council’s determination.
It is acknowledged that staging such a large event has the potential for impacts to occur. These impacts need to be considered having regard to the economic and community benefits that such an event brings to Penrith and the one-off nature of the event. It needs to be acknowledged that Council undertook a significant notification process which resulted in 8 submissions being received. Although the issues raised are relevant, it is conceded that the community feedback would suggest that the event has not caused major community concern. Such events are conducive to a regional city and provide a focus on the City for a short time. The event is a one day temporary use of the site and will be subject to strict environmental management requirements. The event will draw a focus on the Mulgoa area and provide some connection to what the Fernhill site was affiliated with in the past, these being equine pursuits. Given these positive attributes to the event and that there will be benefits to the Penrith and a regional city the proposal is considered to have merit and is recommended for conditional approval.
Background
The applicant attended a pre-lodgement meeting on 18 July 2013 with the following advice being provided by Council:
· The proposal will require approval from the Heritage Council as the site is listed on the State Heritage Register in accordance with Section 57 of the Heritage Act, 1977.
· A Section 60 approval from NSW Heritage Office will be required prior to the commencement of any works on the site.
· Consultation with the stakeholders including NSW Police, City Rail, Western Sydney Area Health Service, NSW Ambulance, Roads and Maritime Service and Rural Fire Service should be undertaken.
· The submission of the Development Application should include a Statement of Environmental Effects, Event Management Plan, Traffic Management Plan, Acoustic Report, Heritage Impact Statement, Security Management Plan, Alcohol Management Plan, Potable Water Information, Food Management Plan, Horse Management Plan and Waste Management Plan.
Site and Surrounds
The subject site is situated on the western side of Mulgoa Road, between Mayfair Road to north and Fairlight Road to the south. It is approximately 700 hectares in area and is characterised by predominantly rural landscape and comprises creek flats, gently sloping agricultural land, wooded hills and escarpment areas. The Blue Mountains National Park and Nepean River are located to the rear of the site.
The site has been identified as a State Significant Heritage Item, with the main residence (single storey ashlar sandstone house) being completed in 1845. Various structures are located on the site in addition to the main residence including the stables and coach house, swimming pool, winery ruin, stone bridges, sheds, dams and rural fencing. The remnants of a horse track area also located on the site.
The surrounding area is characterised by modest sized dwellings on large rural allotments, with smaller residential lots and associated dwellings located within the adjoining Mulgoa Village area. The Blue Mountains National Park provides a backdrop for the locality.
The major roads in close proximity to the site include Mulgoa Road and The Northern Road. Mulgoa Road is aligned in a north‐south direction and runs adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site, with The Northern Road located further east. Both roads provide major north‐south links between Penrith and other western Sydney suburbs and the M4 motorway in the north with Campbelltown, Camden and other regional towns and centres south‐west of Sydney, including the M5 motorway/Hume Highway.
Mulgoa Road has a posted speed limit of 80km/h in the vicinity of the site reducing to 60km/h south of the site access in the township of Mulgoa. Mulgoa Road carries approximately 7,100 vehicles per day.
A Locality Plan is outlined in Appendix 1 to this report.
The Proposed Development
The proposed development comprises the following:
a) Use of the land for purposes of conducting the Fernhill Picnic Horse Racing Event for on 9 November 2013.
b) A total of 20,000 tickets will be sold/ made available to the event; with children under 14 attending the race day will not require a ticket. Various tickets are available to the public, ranging from general admission only, tickets inclusive of food and beverage, private marquees and VIP packages.
c) The temporary structures required as part of the event include a command centre, jockey/ steward office, horse stables, steward towers, outdoor big screen televisions, marquees, grand stands, stage, bathroom facilities, shower facilities, service tents, crowd control barriers, generators, water services
d) Activities and entertainment to support the Picnic Horse Racing Event including VIP marquees, fashions on the field, beer gardens, music, face painting, pony rides, farm animals, outdoor big screen televisions and various sporting activities. A range of food vans will be arriving at the site on race day to provide a variety of food options for spectators. Corporate catering will also be provided onsite.
Gates to the venue will open at 10am, with the gates to the parking areas accessible from 9am. Horse racing will commence at 1pm, with 6 races to be held. A 3 hour concert will be conducted at the conclusion of the horse racing, from 6pm to 9pm as a means of staggering spectators leaving the site and minimising traffic congestions within the local road network.
e) Outdoor big screen televisions will provide opportunities to watch horse races being held at various locations including Randwick and Flemington (VIC). Mobile TAB vans will be provided to enable spectators to place bets on these races. Bookmaking facilities will be provided to enable betting of the horse races at the venue.
f) On-site parking will be provided, with 7,500 spaces available for spectators and 450 staff only spaces. Tickets for the on-site car parking can be pre-purchased for the event.
g) Shuttle bus services will be provided between two pick up locations, Penrith Station and Penrith Paceway to the site. It is expected a shuttle bus will leave Penrith Station every 5 minutes and Penrith Paceway every 10 minutes to the event during peak periods of spectators arriving at the site. An additional Muloga Village bus service will also be provided.
h) Directional, safety and way finding signage will be provided.
Overall Track Map Appendix 2, Stalls Map Appendix 3 and VIP Area Appendix 4 have been included in this report.
Construction works for the temporary structures will commence on 30 October 2013, with the site being returned to its original state by 14 November 2013.
Planning Assessment
The proposal has been assessed in accordance with Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, with due regard to relevant legislation and planning instruments cited as follows: -
• Heritage Act 1977
• Water Management Act 2000
• Sydney Regional Environmental Plan 20 – Hawkesbury / Nepean River
• State Environmental Planning Policy (Temporary Structures and Places of Public Entertainment) 2007
• Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1991 (Environmental Heritage Conservation)
• Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010
• Penrith Development Control Plan 2010.
Having regard to the above legislation, planning instruments and policy, the following key issues have been identified for discussion.
Section 79C(1)(a)(i) – Any Environmental Planning Instrument
Heritage Act 1977
The subject site has been identified as a State Significant Item under the Heritage Act 1977 and is also listed on the Register of the National Estate and National Trust Register.
Section 57 of the Heritage Act states:
(1) When an interim heritage order or listing on the State Heritage Register applies to a place, building, work, relic, moveable object, precinct, or land, a person must not do any of the following things except in pursuance of an approval granted by the approval body under Subdivision 1 of Division 3:
(a) demolish the building or work,
(b) damage or despoil the place, precinct or land, or any part of the place, precinct or land,
(c) move, damage or destroy the relic or moveable object,
(d) excavate any land for the purpose of exposing or moving the relic,
(e) carry out any development in relation to the land on which the building, work or relic is situated, the land that comprises the place, or land within the precinct,
(f) alter the building, work, relic or moveable object,
(g) display any notice or advertisement on the place, building, work, relic, moveable object or land, or in the precinct,
(h) damage or destroy any tree or other vegetation on or remove any tree or other vegetation from the place, precinct or land.
The Development Application was referred to the Heritage Council of New South Wales for consideration. General terms of approval were issues on 11 October 2013 and will be attached to the Notice of Determination.
Water Management Act 2000
Prelodgement meeting advice provided to the applicant outlined that the proposal was likely to be considered to be Integrated Development under the Water Management Act 2000, due to the extensive number of watercourses that are located within the site.
Subsequently, the applicant engaged in correspondence with the Department of Primary Industries – Office of Water, who issued an email response dated 30 July 2013 outlining the following:
If no work (as defined by the EPA Act) is occurring on Waterfront Land (i.e. land within 40 m from the top of the bank of a river including the bed and bank) then no controlled activity approval (CM) from the Office of Water would be required and no further referral is needed.
In my opinion, CM is not required for events even if it includes temporary structure on the waterfront land since temporary structure is not defined as "work" under the EPA Act.
As the proposed works are limited to temporary structures, no further correspondence is required with the Department of Primary Industries - Office of Water.
Sydney Regional Environmental Plan 20 – Hawkesbury / Nepean River
Sydney REP No. 20 integrates planning with catchment management to protect the Hawkesbury-Nepean river system, requiring the impact of future land use to be considered in a regional context. The plan covers water quality and quantity, environmentally sensitive areas, riverine scenic quality, agriculture and urban and rural-residential development. It controls development that has the potential to impact on the river environment. The plan applies to all parts of the catchment in the Sydney region (15 local government areas), except for land covered by Sydney REP No. 11 - Penrith Lakes Scheme. The REP is supported by an Action Plan, which includes actions necessary to improve existing conditions.
The proposed development is in accordance with the general planning considerations set out in Clause 5 of the REP and the relevant specific planning policies and related recommended strategies set out in Clause 6.
A Draft Environmental Management Plan prepared by GHD has been considered in the assessment of the Development Application and is considered to be satisfactory, subject to the completion of the construction and operation checklists (Appendix B & C) within 28 days prior to the event (Refer to Recommended Condition 2.44).
State Environmental Planning Policy (Temporary Structures and Places of Public Entertainment) 2007
The relevant aims of this Policy are:
(a) to ensure that suitable provision is made for ensuring the safety of persons using temporary structures,
(b) to encourage the protection of the environment at the location, and in the vicinity, of temporary structures by (among other things) managing noise, parking and traffic impacts and ensuring heritage protection,
(c) to specify the circumstances in which the erection and use of temporary structures are complying development or exempt development,
It is considered that the temporary event as proposed and subject to the conditions recommended is able to satisfy the aims of the Policy.
Clause 12 of the SEPP states that:
Before granting consent to the erection of a temporary structure, the consent authority must consider the following matters:
a) whether the number of persons who may use the structure at any one time should be limited.
Comment: The maximum number of patrons permitted within any part of the structures to be used as part of the event is to be clearly displayed in a prominent position on each structure used, in particular the temporary grandstands. (Refer to Recommended Conditions 2.08).
any adverse impact on persons in the vicinity of any noise likely to be caused by the erection or use of the structure and any proposed measures for limiting the impact.
Comment: Conditions of consent are recommended to require that the noise activities be managed and controlled to ensure inappropriate noise levels do not occur within an unreasonable period. Refer to Section 79C(1)(b) of this report for an assessment and Conditions 2.40.
b) whether the hours during which the structure is used should be limited.
Comment: The proposed hours of operation are acceptable (as detailed in the Statement of Environmental Effects) provided noise limits are monitored and maintained.
A community contact hotline is also required to be provided so that any concerns regarding noise generation can be address immediately (Refer to Recommended Conditions 2.42).
c) any parking or traffic impacts likely to be caused by the erection of the structure or its proposed use.
Comment: The impacts on the operational performance of the surrounding road networks are satisfactory given the significance of the event to the greater Penrith City area. Refer to Section 79C(1)(b) on traffic further in the report.
d) the principles for minimising crime risk set out in Part B of the Crime Prevention Guidelines.
Comment: Issues of surveillance, access control, territorial reinforcement and space management are to be managed through security controls and access to the event. A Security Planning Document has been provided, which will be distributed to relevant stakeholders prior to the event occurring on the site.
e) whether the proposed location of the structure is satisfactory in the distance of the structure from public roads and property boundaries and in vehicular and pedestrian access.
Comment: The site for the event is large, with the Picnic Racing Event Precinct and existing horse racing track being well setback from the adjoining residential properties.
Adequate vehicular access to the site is provided and extensive parking areas have been provided on site appropriately located in relation to the Picnic Racing Event Precinct within the existing horse racing track.
f) whether it is necessary to provide toilets and washbasins in association with the use of the structure.
Comment: Temporary amenities will be available to the patrons of the event and serviced regularly.
h) whether the structure is proposed to be erected on land that comprises, or on which there is
i) an item of environmental heritage that is listed on the State Heritage Register or that is subject to an interim heritage order under the Heritage Act 1977 or
ii) place, building, work tree, relic or Aboriginal object that is described; as an item of environmental heritage or as a heritage item in another environmental planning instrument, or
iii) land identified as a heritage conservation area, an archaeological site or place of Aboriginal heritage significance in another environmental planning instrument,
Comment: The site has been identified as being a State Significant Heritage Item. The application was referred to the Heritage Council of New South Wales and General Terms of Approval have been provided.
i) the duration for which the structure should be permitted to remain on the land concerned.
Comment: The use of the land is for purposes of conducting a Picnic Horse Racing Event on 9 November 2013. Construction works for the temporary structures will commence on 30 October 2013, with the site being returned to its original state by 14 November 2013, which is considered satisfactory.
j) whether any conditions should be imposed on the granting of consent in relation to the dismantling or removal of the structure in view of any safety issues.
Comment: Council’s Building Surveyor has reviewed the application and provided recommended conditions of consent in regards to the temporary structures (Refer to Recommended Conditions 2.08 and 2.09).
Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1991 (Environmental Heritage Conservation)
Fernhill Estate has been listed as a State Significant Heritage Items. An extract from the Office of Environment and Heritage website, outlining the importance of the site is outlined in Attachment 5 to this report.
Clause 8 of the Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1991 (Environmental Heritage Conservation) relates to the importance of retaining heritage items. It states:
(1) A person must not, in respect of a building, work, tree, relic or place that is a heritage item:
(a) demolish or alter the building or work,
(b) damage or move the relic,
(c) excavate for the purpose of exposing the relic,
(d) damage or despoil the place or tree,
(e) erect a building on, or subdivide, land on which the building, work or relic is situated or that comprises the place, or
(f) damage any tree on land on which the building, work or relic is situated or on the land which comprises the place,
except with the consent of the Council.
(2) An applicant for consent required by this clause must lodge with the Council a statement which includes reference to the following matters:
(a) the significance of the item as a heritage item,
(b) the extent to which the proposal would affect the heritage significance of the item and its site,
(c) whether any stylistic, horticultural or archaeological features of the item or its site should be retained,
(d) whether the item constitutes a danger to the users or occupiers of that item or to the public,
(e) whether the permanent conservation of the building or work is considered necessary,
(f) the probability of the building or work being incapable of reasonable or economic use.
(3) The Council must, in determining an application required by this clause, take into consideration the matters listed in subclause (2).
A heritage impact statement has been submitted with the Development Application detailing the fabric of the heritage listed building and important landscaping will not be impacted by the proposed development, through the use of areas within the site that are not considered to be significant in heritage values.
The Development Application was referred to the Heritage Council of New South Wales for consideration, including the heritage impact statement supporting the application. General terms of approval were issues on 11 October 2013 and will be attached to the Notice of Determination (Refer to Appendix 5).
The heritage impact statement, in conjunction to the General Terms of Approval was considered by Council’s Heritage Officer and no objection was raised in relation to the proposal.
Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010
Permissibility
The subject site is partly zoned E2 Environmental Conservation and partly zoned E3 Environmental Management under Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010. The proposed development is defined as Outdoor Recreation Facility, which is considered to be permissible under the temporary use provisions of the Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010.
Clause 2.8 of the Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 permits the temporary use of land, and states:
(1) The objective of this clause is to provide for the temporary use of land if the use does not compromise future development of the land, or have detrimental economic, social, amenity or environmental effects on the land.
(2) Despite any other provision of this Plan, development consent may be granted for development on land in any zone for a temporary use for a maximum period of 28 days (whether or not consecutive days) in any period of 12 months.
(3) Development consent must not be granted unless the consent authority is satisfied that:
(a) the temporary use will not prejudice the subsequent carrying out of development on the land in accordance with this Plan and any other applicable environmental planning instrument, and
(b) the temporary use will not adversely impact on any adjoining land or the amenity of the neighbourhood, and
(c) the temporary use and location of any structures related to the use will not adversely impact on environmental attributes or features of the land, or increase the risk of natural hazards that may affect the land, and
(d) at the end of the temporary use period the land will, as far as is practicable, be restored to the condition in which it was before the commencement of the use.
(4) Despite subclause (2), the temporary use of a dwelling as a sales office for a new release area or a new housing estate may exceed the maximum number of days specified in that subclause.
(5) Subclause (3) (d) does not apply to the temporary use of a dwelling as a sales office mentioned in subclause (4).
The Horse Racing Event is considered to be a temporary use of the land as a recreation facility (outdoor), being limited to 16 days within a 12 month period and will involve the construction and removal of all temporary structures. In the event that the owners/ applicant wish to hold the event at the site in the future, a separate Development Application would need to be submitted.
A rehabilitation plan will be provided and enacted at the completion of the event to return the site to its predevelopment state.
A Draft Environmental Management Plan prepared by the applicant’s consultants GHD has been considered in the assessment of the Development Application and is considered to be satisfactory, subject to the completion of the construction and operation checklists (Appendix B & C) within 28 days prior to the event (Refer to Recommended Condition 2.44).
While the site has been identified as being bushfire prone land, the location of the horse track and associated temporary structures will not increase the bushfire risk of the site.
Future development on the site will not be affected by the operation of the temporary land use.
LEP and Zones Objectives
The proposed development is consistent with the aims and objectives of both the LEP and the zones themselves.
Clause 6.5 – Protection of scenic character and landscape values
The subject land is located within an area identified as being “Land with scenic and landscape values”, as the site is located on a major road, being Mulgoa Road.
The temporary nature of the use and structures associated with the event means these elements will be removed from the site upon the completion of the event. A rehabilitation plan will be submitted detailing the rectification works to be completed to restore the site back to its original state (Refer to Appendix 5 - Heritage Office General Terms of Approval). It is not envisaged that the development will alter the character of Mulgoa Road.
Section 79C(1)(a)(ii) – Any Draft Environmental Planning Instruments
Stage 2 of the Penrith Planning Proposal outlines that;
“..this Planning Proposal addresses the matters that are required to deliver a comprehensive Local Environmental Plan (LEP) for Penrith. The Planning Proposal covers all land within the City of Penrith, excluding land covered by State Environmental Planning Policy (Western Sydney Employment Area) 2009 and deemed State Environmental Planning Policy SREP No. 30 – St Marys. It is intended that the Planning Proposal will evolve and develop as agency and community consultation is undertaken”.
The Penrith Planning Proposal was placed on public exhibition on 13 May 2013 with exhibition finishing on 5 July 2013.
It is noted that the site is zoned under Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 and the Penrith Planning Proposal does not alter the current zoning of the site.
Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) – Any Development Control Plan
Penrith Development Control Plan 2010
DCP Objectives
It is considered that the objectives of the DCP have been satisfied.
Penrith Development Control Plan 2010 applies to the land. The proposal has been assessed, having regard to the provisions of Part C – Controls applying to all land uses and Part E Section E2 – Mulgoa Valley of DCP 2010 as detailed below:
C2 Vegetation Management
The development site has been identified as containing Cumberland Plain Woodland. An inspection of the site and documentation provided revealed the location of the proposed activities are outside the vegetated areas and as such will have no detrimental impact on native vegetation community.
Council’s Senior Biodiversity Officer considered the proposed development and determined the following:
● The activities associated with the current Development Application do not proposed to remove any trees or other vegetation.
● There will be no access or other impact on the wetland areas and associated vegetation within the central area of the race track.
● The vegetation in the majority of the area where the activities are proposed is pasture grass. Some native shrubs and grasses are present but are highly modified in condition and impact will be minimal, provided consent conditions are implemented.
Recommended conditions by Council’s Senior Biodiversity Officer relating to tree removal, implementation of erosion controls and protection of existing vegetation on site have been included within the recommendations of this report (Refer to Recommended Conditions 2.49, 2.43 and 2.50 respectively).
C3 Water Management
The development site contains a number of water bodies, including creeks of varying sizes and a number of dams. The proposed development does not include any works within the dams or the water bodies.
The Draft Environmental Management Plan prepared by GHD Pty Ltd includes the provision of a Soil and Water Management Plan to protect the water quality of the existing watercourses located on the site. Potable water will also be transported to the site to ensure the provision of a sufficient and reliable water supply to support the event. These matters have been reinforced by special conditions (Refer to Recommended Conditions 2.20 – 2.24).
C4 Land Management
A rehabilitation plan is to be provided detailing the restoration of the site once the event has been completed to ensure the site is returned to its original state.
The submission of the Draft Environmental Management Plan, including the provision of a Soil and Water Management Plan will ensure appropriate measures are implemented during the event to protect the site.
C5 Waste Management
Extensive bathroom and shower facilities will be transported to the site to support the event.
Appropriate conditions of consent have been included requiring the provision of adequate waste and recycling facilities for participants and food stall holders, the management of waste during the event and the appropriate disposal of the waste from the site (Refer to Recommended Conditions 2.38).
Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of the Development
Built and Natural Environment
The temporary nature of the proposed development includes the installation of various temporary structures which will be removed upon completion of the one day event.
The layout of the existing horse racing track and the utilisation of the interior of the track for the spectators as the Picnic Racing Event Precinct provides a suitable response to safeguarding the existing heritage buildings and associated landscaping from being altered by the proposed development. A rehabilitation plan is to be provided and will be implemented to returned areas disturbed by the development back to their pre-development state (Refer to Appendix 5 – Heritage Office General Terms of Approval).
Access, Transport and Traffic
A Traffic Management Plan was submitted with the Development Application detailing the intended paths of travel to and from the site, the provision of signage to identify the best way to access the site and the use of traffic control officers/ local police to manage the movement of vehicles on the event day.
Extensive parking areas are to be provided within the existing paddocks, including the provision of 7500 parking spaces for spectators and 450 parking spaces for event staff. Spectators will be able to pre-purchase car parking tickets to the event.
The Traffic Management Plan is similar to the traffic diversion measures implemented during the “Tough Mudder” event in April 2013, with the exception of commuter buses being provided for this event and a controlled left turn vehicular movements when leaving the site.
The use of the traffic controllers within Mulgoa Road will enable spectators to turn right from the site and head southbound along Mulgoa Road and reduce the likelihood of vehicles using Mayfair Road to undertake a U-turn.
Commuter bus services will be provided from Penrith Train Station and Penrith Paceway to provide alternative transport options for spectators attending the site.
Consultation with the Penrith Local Area Command and the Roads and Maritime Service resulted in the preparation of an amended Traffic Management Plan that addressed the following concerns:
· Conflicts at the exit point of the site with commuter buses entering this same driveway.
· Removal of traffic cones within Mulgoa Road/ Glenmore Parkway roundabout.
· Deletion of commuter bus services from Homebush or Parramatta.
· Increased commuter services from Penrith Station and Penrith Paceway and the provision of a bus service for Mulgoa Village.
The amended event Traffic Management Plan has been considered by the Local Traffic Committee (LTC) on 14 October 2013, with the recommendations of the LTC being required to be satisfied by Condition 2.19.
Of particular note, the Penrith Local Area Command and the Roads and Maritime Service advised the applicant that ongoing traffic diversions within the local road network would not be supported as an ongoing tool to ensure the safe movement of traffic within the locality.
A Development Application for the continued use of the site for such events venue would require upgrading works within Mulgoa Road to support the safe entry and exit of vehicles to the site.
Noise Impacts
It is acknowledged that there is likely to be some impact from noise. Extensive consultation between Council and the organisers has taken place during the assessment process to ensure that impact from noise can be appropriately managed.
A Noise Management Plan has been prepared and assessed by Council’s Environmental Health Officer, which is considered to be appropriate in managing noise generation from the event. The Noise Management Plan details, four (4) noise monitoring locations are proposed at the site boundary to monitor noise transmission from the site during the event.
A minimum of three measurements are to be undertaken during the event at each monitoring location to provide data on noise generated at different stages during the event. A report detailing the outcomes of the event is to be submitted to Council within 28 days of the event (Refer to Recommended Condition 2.40)
As part of “Tough Mudder” event held this year, the organisers provided a hotline for residents to contact the organisers with their concerns during this event. A similar hotline will be provided for the Picnic Races Event, including the provision of a landline and mobile phone option of contacting event organisers to ensure that mobile coverage is not an issue.
A letter drop to residents within 500m of the property boundaries is to take place within 2 weeks of the event. The purpose of this letter is to advise residents of the details of the event and the resident hotline information.
Noise is anticipated to be generated from such a large scale horse racing and music event. The size of the event site, the location of the race track and temporary structures within the site assist in minimising the transmission of noise from the site. The event is to be held one day a year, during reasonable hours of the day. With the appropriate management plans in place, the noise from the event is considered not to have a significant adverse impact on the community.
Social and Economic Impacts
Opportunities for employment leading up to and during the event are a positive outcome of the proposed development. The event will stimulate local businesses and create awareness of the tourist attractions within the Mulgoa Valley and greater Penrith area. A large number of event staff are expected to stay in accommodation for several nights, while spectators will utilise accommodation over the weekend.
Section 79C(1)(c) – The Suitability of the Site for the Development
The temporary nature of the use and structures associated with the event means these elements will be removed from the site upon the completion of the event. The land area is such that it is capable of accommodating all aspects of the development, in particular car parking areas within the existing paddocks.
While it is noted that there will be impact on the movement of traffic within the vicinity of the site, particularly at peak times of people entering and leaving the site, the management of the traffic through the provision of the detailed Traffic Management Plan will ensure the safe movement of vehicular traffic within the vicinity of the site.
Section 79C(1)(d) – Any Submissions made in relation to the Development
Community Consultation
In accordance with Penrith Development Control Plan 2010, the proposed development the proposed development was advertised and notified from 2 September 2013 to 2 October 2013 to over 1200 adjoining owners/ occupiers within a 2km radius of the development site, including Liverpool Council and the Mulgoa Progress Association. Eight (8) submissions were received in response to the notification process.
The following issues were raised in the submissions received and have formed part of the assessment:
Adverse Traffic Impacts on Mulgoa
The provision of such an event within Mulgoa, attracting 20,000 ticketed spectators to Fernhill will increase the level of traffic within the locality. Minor delays were experienced during the “Tough Mudder” event in April 2013 with the road diversions designed to enable the safe and orderly movement of vehicles within the locality. No vehicle accidents were report during the previous “Tough Mudder” event.
Minor delays are expected with additional traffic within the area; however the additional traffic will also result in reduced vehicle speeds. Residents will be able to safely leave their properties, albeit those normal speeds of moving within Mulgoa will not be achieved.
The site is capable of accommodating 7950 car parking spaces to ensure spectators are not parking within the local road network and walking to the site. Given the capacity of the event, the provision of public transport from Penrith Station and Penrith Paceway and an additional bus service within Mulgoa village, it is unexpected that parking will be at capacity during the event.
Road diversion impacts on Farm Road
The road diversions along Farm Road are considered necessary to ensure the safe movement of vehicles within the locality. NSW Police and the RMS confirmed they were not supportive of vehicles heading southbound along Mulgoa Road and turning right into the property. It was also important to ensure vehicle road access through Mulgoa and into Wallacia/ Silverdale to support the local community in the event emergency.
Signage will be provided within the M4 directing eastbound traffic onto The Northern Road and Littlefields Road, with traffic controllers assisting in vehicular movements at the Mulgoa Road/ Littlefields Road intersection.
Adverse noise impacts
Submissions to the Development Application raised concerns regarding the generation of noise during the event and the need for noise monitoring.
Concerns raised in submissions are addressed within the “Noise Impact” section of this report.
Site suitability for the proposed Development
The Local Environmental Plan enables the provision of temporary land uses within the Mulgoa Valley Area. The proposal is not considered to be contrary to the intent of the Local Environmental Plan.
The applicant will be required to rehabilitate the property and return it to its predevelopment state. This rehabilitation of the site will include inspections from the Heritage Office and Council to ensure the works have been undertaken (Refer to Heritage Office General Terms of Approval – Appendix 5).
There needs to be the provision of adequate bus services to support the event
The revised Traffic Management Plan details commuter bus services will be provided from Penrith Train Station and Penrith Paceway. An additional bus service will be provided within Mulgoa Village to support local residents attending the site utilising public transport.
Spectators will not be permitted to enter or exit the site on foot.
Adverse impacts on the residents of Mulgoa
A number of adverse impacts have been identified in the submissions received by Council in addition to noise and traffic impacts, which included additional littering of the local roads, attracting undesirable people to the local area, impacts of people going about their normal routine on weekends and the event being of no benefit to the local community.
The road diversions recommended within the Traffic Management Plan will increase traffic within these local roads. While it is illegal to throw rubbish from a vehicle, it is recommended that clean up along the local roads impacted by the road diversions from Mulgoa Road be undertaken within one (1) week of the event (Refer to Recommended Condition 2.39).
The Picnic Race Event is aimed at a variety of spectators from all walks of life, in particular families, through the provision of free entry for children under 14. The proposal has been supported by the “Fernhill Estate Race Day Security Planning Document” which will be implemented during the event to address security, crowd control and alcohol management.
The Mulgoa Valley is a destination location within Greater Western Sydney. The operation of such an event highlights the attributes of Mulgoa and is considered to have flow on affects to the local community, both during and after the Picnic Race Day event.
In the event that the proposed development is supported, Fernhill Estate would have facilitated two large this year which attracted large numbers to the site. It is therefore not considered that the use of the site for events of this scale being an unreasonable demand on the community or significantly impacting on the enjoyment of their land.
Helicopter Flight Plan
Discussions have been held with the applicant regarding the transportation of people to the event via helicopter. It has been confirmed that helicopters will not be used for the transportation of guests to the event venue.
Helicopters attending the site would only be at the event due to a medical emergency requiring air transportation of person(s). (Refer to Recommended Condition 2.14)
Adequacy of the existing race track to support the horse racing event
Submissions received raised concerns regarding the adequacy of the existing race track to be able to facilitate a horse racing event of the proposed size and nature. It has been outlined that the track was originally constructed as a training facility only.
Racing NSW had been made aware of these concerns and provided correspondence to Council detailing the maintenance works that have been undertaken to the race track, inspections that have been undertaken by Hawkesbury Race Club & Racing NSW and that maintenance works are under supervision to ensure the track is adequate to conduct the Picnic Racing Event.
Correspondence from Racing NSW is outlined in Appendix 6.
Additional and Ongoing Events at Fernhill
Questions have been raised in relation to the ongoing use of the site as an event venue. Future events of a similar size and scale will require the submission of a Development Application.
Council has been advised by the applicant that documentation is currently being prepared in relation submitting a separate Development Application for the ongoing use of the site as an events venue.
Advertising of the Event prior to the determination of the Development Application
It is noted that the Picnic Horse Racing Event has been advertised through a number of mediums including radio, internet and billboard signage prior to the determination of the Development Application.
Discussions were held with the owners regarding the advertising of the event prior to Council’s determination, the advertising of the event and ticket sales were due to the limited timeframes available in advertising the event to ensure it was success. Council has not been involved in directing the applicant to advertise the event prior to determination.
External Referrals
The application was referred to the following stakeholders and their comments have formed part of the assessment:
NSW Police
No formal comments were provided to the Development Application.
State Emergency Service
No formal comments were provided to the Development Application.
NSW Ambulance
No formal comments were provided to the Development Application.
Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District
Formal comments were provided by Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, requesting the following matters be included within the assessment of the Development Application:
· The provision of a risk management plan, as detailed within the Event Management Plan, should be distributed to relevant stakeholders prior to the event.
· Clear identification of potable and non-potable water within the site.
· Further details regarding the provision of composting toilets.
· Provision of free drinking water during the event.
It is noted that the composting toilets are no longer being provided and details regarding temporary toilets to facilitate the event has been submitted to Council. Appropriate conditions of consent have been included to encompass the concerns of Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District regarding all other matters.
Internal Referrals
The application was referred to the following stakeholders and their comments have formed part of the assessment:
Referral Body |
Comments Received |
Building Surveyor |
No objections, subject to conditions of consent |
Community Safety |
No objections, subject to conditions of consent |
Environmental Health Officer – Public Health |
No objections, subject to conditions of consent |
Environmental Health Officer |
No objections, subject to conditions of consent |
Senior Biodiversity Officer |
No objections, subject to conditions of consent |
Senior Traffic Engineer |
Traffic Management Plan supported by the Local Traffic Committee and to be considered at the Council Meeting on 21 October 2013. |
Section 79C (1)(e) – The Public Interest
The proposal involves conducting a Picnic Horse Racing Event to be held on 9 November 2013. The event will attract 20,000 spectators to the site and further promote Mulgoa as a destination location within Great Western Sydney.
The Fernhill Estate has a historical connection to horse related activities, including the training of two Melbourne Cup winning horses. The use of the site for the Picnic Horse Racing Event will reactivate the link to the previous use of the site while promoting the historical values of Fernhill and the Mulgoa Village locality.
The promotion of the event will attract ongoing interest to the Penrith LGA and have economic benefits to the greater community.
Furthermore the proposed event will have minimal impacts on the heritage values of the site, with rectifications works to all disturbed areas to be undertaken after the event.
In view of the above, it is considered that development of the site as proposed would create public benefit, and therefore approval of the application has been recommended subject to certain modifications as discussed in this report.
Section 94 Contributions
There is no Section 94 Contributions Plan applicable to the proposed development.
Conclusion
The applicant seeks consent for the purposes of conducting a Picnic Horse Racing Event to be held on 9 November 2013 at 1041 – 1187 Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa.
The proposed development has been determined to be a temporary land use under relevant planning instruments and satisfies the objectives and provisions of these plans as proposed.
It is acknowledged that there will be some impacts generated by the event, particularly traffic generation. However, as the event is limited to one (1) day, on balance the proposal represents benefits to the community in terms of economic stimulation and maximizing utilisation of the state significant site, without adversely impact on the existing structures or significant landscaped area.
It is therefore acceptable in the circumstances and as such, the event is in the public interest and is recommended for approval.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA13/0863 - Picnic Horse Racing Event to be held on 9 November 2013 at 1041 – 1187 Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa is received. 2. Development Application 13/0863 seeking consent to Conduct a Picnic Horse Racing Event to be held on 9 November 2013 at 1041 – 1187 Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa be approved subject to the following conditions: 2.01 This consent permits the running of the “Fernhill Picnic Horse Racing Event” on 9 November 2013. Any future events on the site would require a separate application for development approval, demonstrating compliance with all conditions of this consent, must be lodged, and approval obtained, prior to operation. 2.02 The maximum number of tickets available for spectators involved in the “Fernhill Picnic Horse Racing” Event is limited to 20,000 people. Children under 14 are not included with the maximum spectator numbers. Evidence of compliance is to be provided to Penrith City Council within three (3) weeks of the event concluding. 2.03 All entertainment and trading including the operation of a Public Address and speaker system is to cease at 9.00pm on the day of the event. 2.04 The development shall comply with the provisions of the Building Code of Australia at all times, with respect to smoke and flame index of materials, emergency lighting, exit signs and fire fighting facilities. 2.05 The event shall comply with all the requirements and undertakings given to and approved by the NSW Police. 2.06 Event organisers will be available at a mutually convenient time, at the invitation of Penrith City Council and/or Penrith Police, to discuss and action agreed Community Safety or Security issues in conjunction with other local Penrith stakeholders should the need arise. 2.07 Access to car parking area, spectator areas and sanitary facilities for persons with disabilities is to be provided and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia and AS 1428 “Design for Access and Mobility”. 2.08 The temporary tent structures, stages and grandstands, when erected, are to fully comply with Part B1 and NSW Part H102 of Volume One of the Building Code of Australia. A Structural Engineer’s Certificate is to be submitted to Council prior to the event, certifying the structural adequacy of the structures. The maximum number of patrons permitted within any part of the structures is to be clearly displayed in a prominent position on each structure. 2.09 The event structures are to be inspected by Penrith City Council at least 24 hours before the event operates for the public. Fees for the inspection are to be paid, as detailed in Penrith City Council’s Fees and Charges, and will be invoiced accordingly. 2.10 The event shall be managed in accordance with the requirements of Schedule 3A - Places of Public Entertainment of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. 2.11 Portable fire extinguishers shall be provided in all areas in accordance with Australian Standard AS 2444–2001 and BCA Part E1.6, with certification submitted to Council prior to the event. 2.12 Two NSW Rural Fire Service Category 1 fire truck shall be provided on the site for the race day. 2.13 Access to the site for the NSW Fire Brigades/ Rural Fire Service/ NSW Ambulance Service is to be made available at all times during the operation of the event. 2.14 Helicopters are not to be used as a method of transporting people to and from the Fernhill Estate, except when responding to any medical emergencies. 2.15 In the event that a helicopter needs to attend the site for a medical emergency, instructions are to be provided that overhead power lines are within the site and due care is to be taken when responding to the emergency. 2.16 Bins are to be provided at Penrith Station / Penrith Paceway and removed at the conclusion of the event. The area utilized by the event at Penrith Station/ Penrith Paceway is to be satisfactorily cleaned to that of pre-event conditions. 2.17 Appropriate place barriers are to be used to direct the pedestrians towards the bus entry point at Penrith Station. 2.18 The Event Management Plans prepared by Global Event Management Pty Ltd, dated August 2013 is to be updated to include the Risk Management Plan, as referred to in this document. The report is to be submitted to Council for consideration a minimum of two weeks before the event. Transport Management Plan 2.19 The recommendations from the Local Traffic Committee Meeting, held on 14 October 2013 are to be implemented in relation to the event (Refer to Appendix 5 to the Notice of Determination). Potable Water Supply 2.20 A Potable Water Supply Management plan is to be provided to Council at least two weeks before the event demonstrating how potable water will be supplied to all required fixtures including food stalls, bars, showers, hand wash basins and stations, and anywhere else where a potable supply is required. The plan shall demonstrate how residual chlorine will be measured and recorded at the supply, delivery of water to storage tanks, and at the end use. The plan should also include information on storage tanks, pumps and the distribution system, tank cleaning, location of storage tanks, and the security of tanks and the water supply. 2.21 The potable water supply shall be maintained in accordance with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines 2004 and the NSW Health Private Water Supply Guidelines 2008. A residual of 0.2 to 0.5 mg/L free chlorine must be maintained in the water supply at all times. 2.22 Residual chlorine must be measured and recorded at the supply, delivery of water to storage tanks, and at the end use. Additional chlorine must be added if residuals cannot be maintained in accordance with NSW Health guidelines. Stored water shall be tested and results recorded a minimum of every 2 hours. Records must be available for Council’s Environmental Health Officers to inspect at all times. 2.23 The supply of water shall be completed in accordance with the NSW Guidelines for Water Caters (NSW Health & NSW Food Authority 2012). The carter must have approval or licensing from Sydney Water or other Water Authority to take water from their supply and the event coordinator must notify Council before the event where water is being sourced from. 2.24 Any water carter providing potable water for the event must make available to Council, for inspection, before the event their water carts, cleaning records and logs, and chlorine testing equipment. The supply of water shall be completed in accordance with the NSW Guidelines for Water Caters (NSW Health & NSW Food Authority 2012) and the carter must have approval or a license from Sydney Water or other Water Authority to take water from their supply. Food 2.25 A detailed Food Management Plan is to be provided to Penrith City Council a minimum of two weeks prior to the event, outlining all aspects of the food supply, storage, and delivery. The food management plan should cover all food supplied to staff and the public for this event. The plan, as a minimum, should include the following: - Food suppliers - Transport of the food to the event; - Food storage - Temperature control (cool rooms etc) - Hand washing facilities and cleaning facilities - Water, electricity and gas supplies - Wastewater disposal - Garbage bins and disposal - Food display and fixtures - Construction of stalls 2.26 Penrith City Council requires all food businesses attending this event to apply to Council for an approval to sell food. This application must be submitted to Council a minimum of two weeks before the event to allow Council sufficient time to assess the applications. Late applications will not be considered or approved. Council will provide the event organiser with a list of approved food businesses prior to the event. Application to sell food forms are available on Council’s website: www.penrithcity.nsw.gov.au Note: A person selling food or operating stalls or mobile vans used for selling food for human consumption, including produce, fruit and vegetables, drinks, or pre-packaged food, is deemed to be a ‘food business’ under the Food Act 2003. This includes not-for-profit organisations. 2.27 Prior to the operation of the food business at this event all food businesses must notify the NSW Food Authority of their details including: - Contact details for the food business, including the name and address of the business and the proprietor of the business. - The nature of the food business. - The location of any other food premises associated with the food business, within the jurisdiction of NSW Food Authority. Notification can be completed free of charge on the NSW Food Authority’s Food Notify website at www.foodnotify.nsw.gov.au. 2.28 A Food Safety Supervisor, with a current Food Safety Supervisor Certificate recognised by the NSW Food Authority, must be appointed by each individual food business prior to the event. The certificate must be available at the day of the event for inspection by Council’s Environmental Health Officers. 2.29 The proprietor of the food business shall ensure that the requirements of the following legislation, codes, and guidelines are met at all times: • NSW Food Act 2003 • NSW Food Regulation 2010 • The Australian and New Zealand Food Standards Code • Guidelines for Temporary Events (NSW Food Authority 2012), and • Mobile food vending vehicles: Operation, construction and food handling guidelines (NSW Food Authority 2009) 2.30 Coolrooms must be supplied by the event organisers for all food vendors and power must be maintained to these coolrooms. The event coordinator is to liaise with food businesses as to their coolroom and storage needs. Cool room temperatures must be routinely monitored and temperatures recorded. An alarm system must be provided to ensure correct temperatures are maintained overnight. 2.31 Toilets must be provided for all food handlers and maintained in a hygienic condition. These toilets must be separate to other event toilets and not available to the general public, employees or officials. The toilets must be located in the immediate vicinity of the food stalls and there should be sufficient toilets to cover the needs of all food handlers. Toilets shall be supplied with a hand washing facilities that provide warm water through a single outlet and be provided with soap and paper towels. Petting Zoo 2.32 Hand sanitiser must be readily available for people handling and coming into contact with animals. Signage must be provided directing people to the hand sanitiser and warning people of the risks associated with handling animals.
Waste and Wastewater 2.33 Temporary sanitary facilities shall be provided for the event in accordance with Table F2.3 of the Building Code of Australia. 2.34 The provisions of toilets for the event are to comply with Clause 34 of Chapter 5 in the Emergency Management Practice Manual, prepared by the Attorney General’s Department. 2.35 All toilet and wastewater facilities are be operated and located in a suitable location so not to cause water pollution either through direct flow into the dams, tributaries or through stormwater drainage system. In the event wastewater enters the dams, tributaries or stormwater system, immediate action is to be taken to minimise any environmental or public health impacts. In addition Council is be notified of the incident within 24 hours. Any wastewater discharge or spill is be cleaned up immediately with the waste being disposed of by a licensed waste contractor. 2.36 All toilets and wastewater facilities are to be maintained in a clean manner for the duration of the event. The facilities are to be pumped out at a frequency deemed necessary to maintain cleanliness. 2.37 A wastewater discharge point is to be provided for food businesses by the event manager for all sullage, greywater and wastewater. No wastewater is to be discharged to the environment. All wastewater is to be transported and disposed off at a lawful and licensed facility by a NSW EPA licensed contractor. Copies of receipts are to be provided to Council. 2.38 Adequate waste and recycling facilities are to be located around the spectator area to cater of waste disposal. Separate waste and recycling facilities are to be provided for the food and refreshment business. Bins are to be located as to not cause pollution and are be frequently emptied. 2.39 Any general waste located within the local road network affected by the local traffic diversions (St Thomas Road, Farm Road & Littlefields Road) is to be removed from these locations within one (1) week of the event being held. Noise 2.40 The services of a suitably qualified consultant is to be engaged to conduct noise testing during the event and provide an Event Acoustic Report to be submitted to Penrith City Council within twenty eight (28) days of the event. The Event Acoustic Report is to comply with Australian Standard AS1055 Acoustics - Description of measurement of environmental noise and New South Wales Environment Protection Authority Industrial Noise Source Policy 2000. 2.41 Noise generated by the activity after 10pm is not to exceed the Sleep Disturbance Criteria provided in the Environmental Protection Authorities Industrial Noise Policy. In the event that the continuous noise monitoring detects any exceedance, the noise levels are to be reduced immediately. 2.42 A community contact hotline (landline and mobile) by the event organiser is to be made available to the surrounding area in case noise nuisance occurs. Any complaints are to be reported to the event manager and where necessary action is to be taken to resolve the noise nuisance. The event manager if so required by an authorised officer, the acoustic consultant or the NSW Police Force must have the authority to order the reduction of noise level produced. Two (2) weeks prior to the event being held, details of the noise complaint hotline (including landline and mobile phone) are to be distributed to residents within 500m of the property boundaries of the site. Environmental Management 2.43 Erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed prior to the commencement of works on site. The erosion and sediment control measures are to be maintained in accordance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan(s) for the development and the Department of Housing’s “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004. (Note: To obtain a copy of the publication, you should contact Landcom on (02) 98418600). The approved sediment and erosion control measures are to be installed prior to and maintained throughout the construction phase of the development until the land, that was subject to the works, have been stabilised and grass cover established. These measures shall ensure that mud and soil from vehicular movements to and from the site does not occur during the construction of the development. No activities are to result in the pollution of waterways. All waterways located near the event sites (including the race track), whether ephemeral or otherwise, are to be appropriately protected with the use of sedimentation controls. No riparian or aquatic vegetation is to be removed as part of the event. The erosion and sedimentation controls are to be maintained until such time as any disturbed areas have been stabilised. 2.44 The ‘Fernhill Picnic Races, Fernhill Estate Mulgoa: Draft Environmental Management Plan’ prepared by GHD dated October 2013 is to be implemented and adhered to during the construction and operational phases of the event. The checklists included in Appendix B and Appendix C is to be completed as required by the Environmental Management Plan and submitted to Council within twenty eight (28) days of the event. 2.45 The ‘Fernhill Picnic Races: Dust Management and Runoff Prevention Plan’ dated 25 September 2013 is to be implemented and adhered to during the construction and operational phases of the event in relation to all areas of the Fernhill Estate utilised for the picnic races event. 2.46 All waste generated by the horses associated with the event are to be disposed of in accordance with the existing Fernhill Estate waste management program, as outlined in the ‘Supplementary Information’ prepared by Global Event Management Pty Ltd dated September 2013. 2.47 The hosing out of the temporary horse stables/structures with water for cleaning purposes is not permitted. Stables are to be cleaned using predominantly dry methods that limit the use of water. Acceptable methods would include sweeping, mopping and manual collection and disposal of horse manure. 2.48 All wastewater generated by the use of the horse washbays is not to enter waterways. This wastewater is to be captured and disposed of to an appropriately licensed waste management facility. 2.49 No trees or other vegetation (including native understorey and grass species) are to be removed, ringbarked, cut, topped, lopped or wilfully destroyed without the prior consent of Penrith City Council and in accordance with Council’s Tree Preservation Order Policy. Tree protection measures may be required where vehicles or structures will be near trees. 2.50 No fill, machinery or materials are to be placed or stored within the drip-line of any tree, unless appropriate tree protection measures are in place. 2.51 No fill material is to be imported to the site without the prior approval of Penrith City Council in accordance with Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No.20 (Hawkesbury- Nepean River) (No.2-1997). No recycling of material for use as fill material shall be carried out on the site without the prior approval of Council. 2.52 Dust suppression and minimisation strategies must be employed to manage potential dust nuisances within the site. This is to apply to parking areas, access roads and within the event site. 2.53 Mud and soil from vehicular movements to and from the site must not be deposited on the road. 2.54 All waste materials stored on-site are to be contained within a designated area such as a waste bay or bin to ensure that no waste materials are allowed to enter the stormwater system or neighbouring properties. The designated waste storage areas shall provide at least two waste bays / bins so as to allow for the separation of wastes, and are to be fully enclosed when the site is unattended. 2.55 All disturbed areas that have experienced loss of ground cover or other vegetation as a result of the event is to be rehabilitated using native seed (including when seed spraying) or plants suitable to the local community and is to be of local provenance (western Sydney) only. No exotic plants or grasses are to be used. A list of suitable species is to be sought from a suitably qualified ecologist. Security and Safety 2.56 The applicant must provide a combination of security personnel and paid Policing for the duration of the event. This includes a number of security guards on the site determined in conjunction with Penrith Police and agreed to by Penrith City Council 2 weeks prior to the event. Drug and Alcohol Management 2.57 The guidelines contained in the Alcohol Management Plan must be adhered to by security and event staff to promote responsible consumption of alcohol and minimise opportunities for alcohol-related antisocial behaviour to occur. 2.58 Security personnel must be provided within the on-site car park and at each bar area for crowd control and to monitor intoxicated persons and minimise alcohol-related antisocial behaviour. 2.59 Glass containers must not be permitted, with plastic containers or cans to be used instead. All cans must be opened at the bar. 2.60 Bags shall be searched upon entry in accordance with the “Fernhill Estate Race Day Security Planning Document” provided by the applicant. Eskies shall not be permitted into the event. 2.61 Alcohol must not be brought in to the event, but must only be purchased on site from the licensed vendors. The consumption of alcohol within the car park on the site is not permitted. 2.62 Bar areas must comply with all RSA and legislative requirements concerning the sale and service of alcohol. 2.63 Free water must be provided at all bar areas and bottle refilling stations. Crowd Management 2.64 The Crowd Control procedures provided in the “Fernhill Estate Race Day Security Planning Document” must be adhered to by security and event staff throughout the event. 2.65 Event organisers must be able to communicate with the crowd both for public announcements and in emergencies. Major and Medical Incidents 2.66 The ‘Sydney’s Country Race Day Medical Plan’ provided by the applicant must be followed by all event staff. Training should be provided to staff to ensure they are familiar with the plans and steps that should be followed in the event of an incident or emergency. 2.67 Records should be kept of all incidents at the event, and should include details such as the date, location and time of incident, description of incident, contact details of person involved, and action taken. Lighting and Power 2.68 Lighting is to be provided within the car park at Penrith Station and Penrith Paceway for the duration of the event. 2.69 Lighting should be provided to clearly illuminate entry and exit points, food stalls, toilets, first aid areas and stage area. 2.70 Access to the main lighting or house lights is essential in case of an emergency. The location of the controls for these lights, and the operation of the controls, must be known to those on-site responsible for emergencies. Signage 2.71 Clear signage should be displayed throughout the event to clearly indicate entry/exit points, public transport locations, emergency help points, toilets, first aid, stage locations, telephones, vendors and licensed/non-licensed areas. |
1. View |
Locality Plan |
1 Page |
Appendix |
2. View |
Track Map |
1 Page |
Appendix |
3. View |
Stalls Map |
1 Page |
Appendix |
4. View |
VIP Map |
1 Page |
Appendix |
5. View |
Heritage Office General Terms of Approval |
3 Pages |
Appendix |
6. View |
Letter from Racing NSW |
2 Pages |
Appendix |
Outcome 3 - We can get around the City
There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places
Item Page
3 Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Community Cultural Grants Program 2013-14 63
4 Tender Reference 13/14-07 – Construction Work for Amenities Block at Blair Oval, St Marys 78
3 |
Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Community Cultural Grants Program 2013-14 |
|
Compiled by: Cali Vandyk-Dunlevy, Cultural Development Officer
Heather Chaffey, Acting Coordinator Neighbourhood Renewal Program
Authorised by: Jeni Pollard, Place Manager
Outcome |
We have safe, vibrant places |
Strategy |
Grow and revitalise our centres and neighbourhoods |
Service Activity |
Work with the community to deliver priority infrastructure and activation projects in identified established areas of the City |
Executive Summary
This report informs Council of the successful outcomes in the 2012- 2013 Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Grants Program and recommends seven placemaking projects in 2013-2014 for funding.
Since 2007 Magnetic Places has resulted in the delivery of 45 innovative and highly successful placemaking and activation projects, celebrating creativity, diversity, culture and pride in twelve established neighbourhoods across Penrith city.
Magnetic Places supports local residents, artists, community organisations and local business to work together, to transform local spaces into vibrant places across Penrith city. Positive outcomes include greater community cohesion, participation and wellbeing through the development of healthier and more attractive places in our neighbourhoods.
Magnetic Places compliments the investment in Neighbourhood Renewal areas as a key component of the endorsed Special Rates Variation (SRV) 2011. The program outcomes are award winning as recognised by the Local Government Cultural Awards in 2010, and position Penrith City as an innovator in collaborative community led place making in Western Sydney.
The projects that were funded in the previous 12 months have continued to build on the success of previous years, bringing public places and gathering spaces to life in innovative ways. In 2012-2013 approximately 950 people, 15 established artists, 10 community and cultural organisations, as well as a range of local businesses have directly participated in Magnetic Places activities and events, demonstrating the program’s valuable contribution to the health and wellbeing of communities in Penrith.
The Magnetic Places 2013-14 funding round continues to offer three streams to support creative, cultural and place making projects as well as community activation events in local parks. Funds totalling $50,000 are available for allocation in the 2013-14 program.
Fourteen applications were received in the 2013 - 2014 funding round. After a competitive process, the assessment panel has recommended seven projects to be funded across a range of neighbourhoods in Penrith. This report recommends that the seven projects listed in the 2013-14 Summaries of Recommended Projects (Appendix 1), are funded to the value of $43,500 with the remainder allocated to support marketing and promotion of funded projects and quality community engagement processes for the future development of the program. The report further recommends that all unsuccessful projects (Appendix 2) are provided with feedback including options for alternative funding sources.
Background
The Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Grants Program was initiated in 2007-08 as a pilot with the objective of enabling residents, community groups, artists and organisations to activate local places. Funds were allocated to the development of activities in local communities that enlivened and enriched community meeting places across Penrith City, transforming them into ‘magnetic places’.
The Magnetic Places initiative operates within the Neighbourhood Renewal Program, focussed on the renewal of selected neighbourhoods to contribute to a sense of community identity and cohesiveness. Funds allocated under the Magnetic Places initiative continue to prioritise projects in neighbourhood renewal communities. However, projects in other suburbs or neighbourhoods within the Penrith LGA are also considered if they are of strong merit and meet the essential criteria.
The program is currently in its sixth year with forty five successful projects that have been funded, each celebrating creativity, diversity and culture in the established neighbourhoods across the city. Magnetic Places has been a catalyst in assisting local creative and cultural activity to be more visible and enabling the diverse voices of the community to be heard. Project evaluations demonstrate that participants have made new friends, gained new confidence, and have learned new skills. It has brought public places to life in innovative ways, developing pride in place. Public spaces have been transformed into magnetic, creative and meaningful places making a valuable contribution to the health and wellbeing of residents and communities.
Magnetic Places has generated a high level of interest from local communities, the community, arts and cultural sector of Western Sydney and Sydney, as well as State and Federal arts and cultural agencies. The program was the recipient of a Local Government Cultural Award at Parliament House NSW in 2010.
Young people dancing krump and hip hop activated St Marys Corner in the project Street Dance Stories from St Marys by Abaker Athum
The current program was redeveloped in 2012 into a three stream funding program to cultivate greater focus on place-making and creative community engagement outcomes. The Special Rates Variation proposal endorsed by Council in 2011 included an annual allocation of funds to the Neighbourhood Renewal Program, including Magnetic Places, to support implementation of identified priorities within Neighbourhood Action Plans.
The Magnetic Places program funds projects across the following categories:
Stream 1 (funding up to $1500) – Community Collaborations directed at small projects that offer creative responses to issues identified by local residents with a focus on place. Priority is given to projects which activate local parks.
Stream 2 (funding up to $8000) – Creative Communities focuses on projects that activate and bring to life public spaces and meeting places through creative engagement and expression of local residents. Priority is given to proposals that build partnerships.
Stream 3 (funding up to $15000 in Year 1 up to $15,000 in Year 2) – Seeding Creativity targets projects that activate and transform a public space through creative and cultural collaboration with the local community, over 2 years. Priority will be given to projects that develop strategic partnerships with a range of organisations to highlight community strengths or respond to a community issue that emerges over the course of the project. Projects that demonstrate development and sustained outcomes beyond the life of the project are prioritised.
Artists, community workers and residents of all ages engaged in creativity at the Cranebrook Family Fun Day by Nepean Community and Neighbourhood Services (NCNS).
2012-2013 Program Outcomes
In November 2012 Council endorsed funding for eight projects through Magnetic Places totalling $48,000.
Throughout 2012-13 project evaluations reflected that approximately nine hundred and fifty people directly participated in Magnetic Places activities and events across the City. Local residents were leading and collaborating with artists, community organisations and businesses to activate community meeting places with priority given to the established areas of the City.
Highlights from have included:
· St Marys Solas where technology, arts environmental workshops led by artist David Ryan culminated in a pop up exhibition in a shop front in Queen Street, St Marys.
· You, Me & All of Us involving a series of workshops led by Photographer Mandy Schöne-Salter with young people from Londonderry Public School. The project culminated in a pop up exhibition in the Londonderry Arcade, as part of the Head On Photo Festival 2103. This project also produced a hard copy publication which showcases the best photographic works taken by participants in this project.
· The Capture Colyton Place Making Project by St Clair Youth and Neighbourhood Team, with Media on the Margins who facilitated photography workshop with local residents to tell stories about their place, culminating in a showcase event at Colyton Community Centre. This project produced a set of Colyton Postcards celebrating the photography of local residents.
· The Park Kings project in Kingswood Park by Information and Cultural Exchange (ICE) in partnership with Nepean Community Neighbourhood Services (NCNS), included digital storytelling by young people in Kingswood producing very moving and insightful digital and photographic works.
· Street Dance Stories from St Marys activated St Marys Corner through street dance krump and hip hop workshops with young African Australians led by Artist Masta One Abaker Athum.
Magnetic Places transform into Pop Up spaces including
(left image) St Marys Solas bringing to life an empty shopfront in Queen Street, St Marys and (right image) You, Me & All of Us launch showcasing an exhibition of photographic works by young people with artist Mandy Schöne-Salter in Londonderry Arcade.
To celebrate the success of these projects and to encourage people to apply for the new founding round, a promotional You Tube video clip was produced by filmmaker Vanna Seang, http://www.penrithcity.nsw.gov.au/MagneticPlaces/. This clip is linked to cross promotion of the Magnetic Places program through Council’s social media platforms.
Feedback and evaluations from participants across funded projects has been extremely positive, and has included the following reflections:
“I am proud to be resident of Colyton”
“Photo voice has let me pause, and look at Colyton from a different perspective”
“I have made good friends within weeks of attending the workshops”
“It was inspiring for the young kids”
“Every week my daughter was really excited about coming along to the workshops”
“I can come here in the afternoon and create these things and have so much fun”
“I love coming to the group it’s a lovely space to be in”
“I met a lot of people from all over Cranebrook everyone came together and had fun”
“The fun day brought a lot more people together as a community”
“Even the kids that were outside wanted to go and dance, it was really cool”
“I think more events like this will bring the community together.”
In addition to the activation of public spaces, benefits identified by participants include:
· greater ownership of place and connectedness in communities,
· collaborations between residents, artists, local business and organisations,
· the development of new skills and creative potential,
· the formation of significant friendships,
· building of personal confidence,
· new pathways and opportunities.
Positive stories from the program have emanated through local and mainstream media. Projects have received significant press coverage locally with active support from Council’s Communications Team in the Penrith Press, Penrith Star as well as on Penrith City Council’s Facebook page, Twitter, Magnetic Place Blog http://magneticplaces.blogspot.com.au/ and cultural sector e-networks such as Artfiles.
The statistics measured on the Magnetic Places Blog reveal that projects are being followed across the globe with 9,054 visits to date. The analytics show that the site is primarily viewed by visitors from the United States and Australia, followed by Asia, Europe and Canada.
Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Grants Program 2013 - 14
The program has a total of $50,000 dedicated to delivery each year. Continuing to build on the improvements to the program of previous years, the Magnetic Places 2013-14 Program Guidelines have been reviewed and updated with a new emphasis that prioritises the activation of local parks for Stream 1. Following feedback from applicants regarding the application form for Stream 1, the form has been reviewed and amended with the application being simplified and shortened. As per the improvements to the program in 2011 and 2012, individual artists are encouraged to apply and groups may apply for all streams concurrently.
Magnetic Places applications opened on Wednesday 7 August and closed Friday 13 September 2013. Applicants were required to submit their applications using an online application facility, SmartyGrants.
The program called for applications in the following categories:
Stream 1 - Community Collaborations: projects could apply for funds up to $1,500.
Stream 2 - Creative Communities: projects could apply for funds up to $8,000.
Stream 3 - Seeding Initiatives: projects could apply for funds up to $15,000 for the first year of the project, and up to $15,000 for the second year of the project, totalling $30,000 over two years.
Program guidelines were also available on Council’s website and in hard copy at Council’s front desk both at St Marys and Penrith. All applications received in the current funding round were submitted online demonstrating applicants’ preference for the online medium.
Program Promotion
The Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Grants Program 2013-14 was extensively advertised to artists, organisations and residents across Penrith and wider Western Sydney in a cross promotional strategy commencing in early August and running up to the closing date in September 2013.
The promotion included the distribution of magnetic places posters and information postcards as well as an extensive social media and electronic media strategy.
An extensive promotional strategy included the distribution of information through the following forums:
· the Penrith Local Artist Network through the Artist and Community Toolkit mailing list and e-network
· local social service networks such as Penrith Interagency and Penrith Youth Interagency,
· the Penrith City Council website, Twitter and Facebook platforms
· Magnetic Places Blog http://magneticplaces.blogspot.com.au/
· Featured in Artfiles News, an online bulletin produced by Information & Cultural Exchange that is distributed extensively to artists across wider Western Sydney,
· Featured in Arts Hub online a cultural industries website and e-bulletin
· Included in other cultural sector e-bulletins including Museums and Galleries NSW, Community Cultural Development Network (CCDN) and Theatre Network Victoria (TNV)
· Presentation by Council Officers at the Artist + Community Toolkit Grant-Writing in Practice Workshop held in early September 2103.
Support to Applicants – ‘On the Money’ Grant Writing Intensive Workshop
In order to support the best possible project ideas to come forward, a number of initiatives were trialled this year to assist people in the application process.
The ‘On the Money’ grant writing intensive workshop was delivered in September as part of the highly successful Artist + Community Toolkit Workshop Series with 25 participants attending, many being prospective Magnetic Places applicants. The workshop was facilitated by Dr Paula Abood, and covered the essentials of preparing a strong grant submission. The purpose of the workshop was to further develop skills in preparing funding submissions to improve the quality of proposals with specific emphasis on the Magnetic Places Program Guidelines and criteria.
In addition to the workshop, two days of individual one on one meetings were held with prospective applicants and Council Officers to provide feedback on project ideas and emphasise place making criteria.
Assessment of 2012-2013 Applications
A total of fourteen applications were received in the 2013- 2014 Magnetic Places Grants Program round.
Unfortunately three of these applications were marked ineligible as they did not meet the essential criteria reducing the total number of applications considered. Feedback will be provided to these applicants.
The Magnetic Places assessment panel assessed each application against the Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Grants Program 2013-14 criteria and program objectives described in the Program Guidelines.
The panel was formed to develop recommendations to Council on which projects to fund and included an independent assessor Lina Kastoumis, Program Officer, Community Partnerships from the Australia Council for the Arts. An independent assessor is included on the assessment panel each year to support good practice assessment procedures as well as provide an independent voice from within the cultural sector. Lina Kastoumis contributed valuable expertise in quality creative community engagement and cultural development practice as well as experience in place making.
All Stream 2 and 3 Applicants were requested to submit letters of support from community partners and at least two names and contact details for local residents involved in project proposals. This was required to demonstrate that the project has strong connections within the local community. In addition to this they were also required to submit up to 5 pages or five minutes of examples of their work.
Applications recommended for funding by the assessment panel
Fourteen applications were received requesting a total of $145,490 far in excess of the $50,000 available. Of these applications, eleven satisfactorily met eligibility requirements and were assessed against the essential criteria on their merits and ranked according to how well they met these criteria.
The competitive assessment process resulted in seven applications being recommended by the assessment panel to Council for funding. The assessment panel noted that some very promising applications were received but unfortunately not all projects could be funded. It was also noted that some applications that were unsuccessful or marked ineligible had not contacted Council Officers for support prior to submitting their proposal.
In accordance with the program criteria, projects that activate places in the Neighbourhood Renewal areas have been prioritised and this is reflected in the panel’s recommendations.
Projects that have been recommended for funding meet all of the essential and desirable criteria as prescribed in the Program Guidelines. Detailed summaries of projects recommended for funding are provided in Appendix 1.
Unfortunately, three projects have not been recommended for funding because they failed to meet the grant funding eligibility requirements. Five remaining projects have not been recommended for funding by the assessment panel and further details are provided in Appendix 2 including reasons for not recommending funding. It is important to note that this year the assessment panel has been unable to recommend any new Stream 3 applications to receive funding, given they do not sufficiently meet all of the essential criteria. Unsuccessful projects in this funding round will be encouraged to resubmit for the 2014-15 program. Council Officers will be available to give detailed feedback for unsuccessful applicants to assist future applications and include suggestions for alternative funding sources outside Council’s Magnetic Places Program.
2013-14 Summaries of Recommended Projects
Projects recommended by the assessment panel totalling $43,500 to be funded in 2013-14 are listed below.
Table 1- Recommended Projects 2013-14:
Stream |
Project Name |
Applicant |
Recommended funding |
Stream 1 - Community Collaborations |
|||
|
Chinese Community Artwork |
Penrith Women’s Health Centre
|
$1,500 |
Let’s Get Digital
|
North St Marys Neighbourhood Centre Inc.
|
$1,500 |
|
Penrith Women Cancer Survivors Gathering
|
Cancer Council NSW (Penrith Community Office) |
$1,500 |
|
Stream 2 - Creative Communities |
|||
|
Generation Z
|
Mandy Schöne-Salter, Artist |
$8,000 |
Art In A Can
|
Fusion Western Sydney |
$8,000 |
|
St Marys – my place, my home
|
Abaker Athum, artist Auspiced by NSW Service for the Treatment And Rehabilitation of Torture And Trauma Survivors (STARTTS)
|
$8,000 |
|
Stream 3 - Seeding Creativity |
|||
|
Capture Colyton Place Making Project - Colyton
|
St Clair Youth and Neighbourhood Team |
$15,000 (Stage 2: 2013-14)
|
TOTAL |
$43,500 |
Conclusion
The Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Community Cultural Grants Program continues to grow and evolve as communities collaborate with each other, artists and organisations to celebrate their local identity and build creative capacity across the City.
During the previous 12 months, eight projects involving approximately 950 people, 15 artists, 10 community and cultural organisations, as well as local businesses have directly participated in Magnetic Places activities and events. These projects have built cohesion, innovation, creativity and wellbeing in local communities.
In this sixth year of the program, the seven projects totalling $43,500 are recommended to Council for approval will deliver opportunities to address a broad range of community issues and will creatively activate a range of local places to enrich our neighbourhoods.
The ongoing development of the award winning Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Community Cultural Grants Program will continue to position Penrith City as a leader in quality creative community engagement and collaborative place-making with local communities.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Community Cultural Grants Program 2013-14 be received. 2. The seven projects recommended by the assessment panel be funded as listed in Appendix 1. 3. That all projects not funded as listed in Appendix 2 are provided with feedback including other avenues of funding. |
1. View |
Magnetic Places 2013/14 Projects Recommended for Funding |
3 Pages |
Appendix |
2. View |
Magnetic Places 2013/14 Projects Not Recommended for Funding |
2 Pages |
Appendix |
Appendix 1 - Magnetic Places 2013/14 Projects Recommended for Funding
Appendix 2 - Magnetic Places 2013/14 Projects Not Recommended for Funding
4 |
Tender Reference 13/14-07 – Construction Work for Amenities Block at Blair Oval, St Marys |
|
Compiled by: Rosemarie Canales, Architectural Supervisor
Authorised by: Michael Jackson, Major Projects Manager
Outcome |
We have safe, vibrant places |
Strategy |
Improve our public spaces and places |
Service Activity |
Provide designs and plans for Council's parks, buildings, roads and drains |
Executive Summary
A tender for the construction of an amenities block at South Creek Park BMX Facility was advertised on 17 September and 20 September and the tender closed on 9 October 2013.
This report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process and recommends that the tender from AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd be awarded the contract for a contract sum of $249,900.00 ex GST
Background
This project is for the provision of canteen, office/store room and toilet facilities at Blair Oval, St Marys, South Creek Park for the benefit of the Penrith BMX Club, Nepean Seniors Athletics Club and Nepean Little Athletics Club. The budget includes a NSW Government Community Building Partnership grant, Penrith BMX Club and Council contributions.
In April 2011 Penrith BMX Club was notified that it had successfully achieved an $88,000 NSW Government Community Building Partnership grant as a contribution towards the construction of an amenities building at South Creek Park BMX Facility including storage, office space and canteen. In addition to the $88,000 NSW Government Community Building Partnership, the Club is also contributing $20,000 towards the project.
The Club’s grant application identified that the provision of a canteen and storage office will provide the Club with the opportunity to generate funds, which will be used for future development of the sport, community programs and activities and the facility. It will also better enable the Club to bid for and host state, national and international standard events.
Since the grant application, a number of design challenges presented by the site have been overcome and it has subsequently been determined that the additional provision of toilets within the proposed building is required. Inclusion of toilets will provide significant benefit for the BMX Club and the athletics user groups at the venue. There is currently some toilet provision at Blair Oval but this is distant from the BMX track and the field events area for athletics, the access way is unlit at night, and more toilets will allow larger sports events to be held.
At its Policy Review Committee Meeting on 11 March 2013, Council resolved that $775,000 be allocated from Council’s District Open Space Plan Developer Contribution Section 94 funds towards a range of facility improvements at South Creek Park, including amenities.
A component of that budget is now available for the provision of an amenities building with a canteen, office/store room and toilet facilities.
Tender & Evaluation Process
A tender for the construction of an amenities block at South Creek Park BMX Facility was advertised on the e-tendering website and in the Sydney Morning Herald on 17 September, and 20 September in the Western Weekender. The tender closed on 9 October 2013.
Tenderers were required to submit their tender either by using the APET 360 online portal or a hard copy on a standard pro forma sheet, which clearly identified the required response against each of the evaluation criteria.
All prospective tenderers were invited to attend a pre-tender briefing on 1 October 2013. This briefing included an online demonstration on Council’s electronic tendering portal, and provided an opportunity for prospective tenderers to seek any necessary clarification of the specifications required to perform the tender.
The Tender Evaluation Panel consisted of Laura Schuil (Supply Officer- Contracts) Rosemarie Canales (Architectural Supervisor) and was chaired by Michael Jackson (Major Projects Manager). The selection criteria advertised and used in assessing the tenders received included the following:
· Demonstrated Ability
· Works Method and Program
· Financials
· Employment Policies (Apprenticeships)
· Quality Assurance Systems
· Environmental Management Systems
· Work Health & Safety
· Industrial Relations
· Commercial Requirements
· Conflict of Interest
Initial Tender Review
A full listing of the tenders received is detailed below (ex GST).
Company |
Tendered Price (ex GST). |
AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd |
$249,900.00 |
ARCS Group** |
$262,201.00 |
ADR Group Pty Ltd |
$294,913.00 |
SFS Projects Australia Pty Ltd |
$359,944.00 |
Artel Constructions PL |
$375,000.00 |
Westco Building Consultants Pty Ltd |
$384,850.00 |
Deltabuild Contractors Pty Ltd |
$400,442.00 |
AVANT Construction Pty Ltd |
$433,300.00 |
Ally Property Services Pty Ltd trading as Ally Civil |
$554,163.76 |
ALPALL P/L Builder |
$707,000.00 |
**An incomplete tender was received from ARCS Group after the closing time.
Of the nine complete tenders received, the five with the lowest tender prices were evaluated against the selection criteria to determine an initial ranking.
Company |
Tendered Price (ex GST). |
AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd |
$249,900.00 |
ADR Group Pty Ltd |
$294,913.00 |
SFS Projects Australia Pty Ltd |
$359,944.00 |
Artel Constructions PL |
$375,000.00 |
Westco Building Consultants Pty Ltd |
$384,850.00 |
Consideration was then given to the tenderers’ trade price schedules to determine the best value for money solution, and the lowest priced tenders, with competency in technical aspects of the tender.
Following initial assessment and clarification, the tender from AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd and ADR Group Pty Ltd were considered by the Tender Evaluation Panel to be most suitable for short listing and further analysis.
Evaluation of Shortlisted Tenders
The shortlisted tenderers were subjected to an independent financial evaluation and both received positive financial evaluations. The tenderers were contacted by the Tender Evaluation Panel to confirm their understanding of the scope and answer any minor queries arising from their submission. The Tender Evaluation Panel is of the view that each shortlisted tenderer demonstrated that they fully understood the scope of works.
The recommended company, AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd was selected based on their compliance with the tender evaluation criteria, their demonstrated ability to meet Council’s requirements and competitive price for the services offered.
Auscorp Construction Pty Ltd are a construction company based in Western Sydney, with their office located at Bella Vista NSW. Auscorp Construction Pty Ltd service a number of Local Government and State Government clients such as: NSW Public Works, Department of Education, Sydney Water, Railcorp, Health NSW, NSW Police, NSW Fire and Rescue, Hills Shire Council, Campbelltown Council.
A reference check was completed with Corporate Scorecard that indicated that the performance of AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd was satisfactory.
Financial Services Manager’s Comment
Included in the assessment of the tender was the commissioning of independent reference checks, financial analysis, and performance analysis on AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd. These checks were completed by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd and have been reviewed by Financial Services. Based on this review no concerns were raised as to the ability of AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd to perform the works described.
Tender Advisory Group (TAG) Comment
The Tender Advisory Group (TAG) consisting of the Chief Governance Officer, Stephen Britten and the Acting Senior Governance Officer, Adam Beggs met to consider the tender for construction works for the BMX/Athletics Amenities.
The TAG made enquiries with the Panel to determine whether the recommended tenderer was aware of the scope of works that were required by the tender. The Panel advised staff that the proposed tenderer had been contacted, and confirmed that all elements of the tender specification were covered within their tender.
The TAG further requested that the Panel undertake a cost assessment of the recommended tender price using the Rawlinsons Construction Handbook 2013. The Panel advised that that the tender received is within a reasonable range of that estimated using the Rawlinson Construction Handbook 2013.
Based on the additional information requested the TAG supports the process and the recommendations contained within the Report.
Conclusion
The Tender Evaluation Panel is of the opinion that AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd has provided the most advantageous tender and it is recommended that the Company be awarded the contract for a contract sum of $249,900.00 ex GST.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 13/14-07 –Construction Work for Amenities Block at Blair Oval, St Marys be received. 2. The tender for the construction works to BMX/Athletics Amenities for the amount of $249,900.00 (ex GST) from AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd be accepted. 3. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all documentation if necessary. |
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 5 - We care about our environment
Item Page
5 Floodplain Management Association 54th Annual Conference - 20 to 23 May 2014 85
5 |
Floodplain Management Association 54th Annual Conference - 20 to 23 May 2014 |
|
Compiled by: Kerrie Metcalf, Engineering Services Secretary
Authorised by: Adam Wilkinson, Engineering Services Manager
Outcome |
We care for our environment |
Strategy |
Minimise risks to our community form natural disasters |
Service Activity |
Provide a strategic framework to manage floodplains and inform land use policy |
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to advise Council of the 54th Annual Floodplain Management Association (FMA) Conference, to be held in Deniliquin from 20 May to 23 May 2014, and to authorise the attendance of Council’s delegates. The report recommends that Council nominate delegates to attend the 2014 FMA Conference.
Background
The Floodplain Management Association has as its objectives:
· support the primary objective of the State Government’s Flood Prone Land Policy, namely to reduce the impact of flooding and flood liability on individual owners and occupiers and to reduce private and public losses from flooding
· press for optimum financial assistance by State and Federal Governments to Flood Mitigation Authorities to implement the Government’s Flood Prone Land Policy
· provide a forum for exchange of information and ideas related to flood mitigation
· foster good relationships and effective liaison between the Association and Government departments.
To support these objectives, the Association holds a conference annually.
Current Situation
The 54th Annual Floodplain Management Association Conference is to be held in Deniliquin from Tuesday 20 May 2014 to Friday 23 May 2014.
The theme of this conference is “Of Utes and Flooding Rains”. Council’s delegates to the FMA (confirmed at Council’s meeting of 24 September 2012) are the Deputy Mayor Councillor Jim Aitken OAM, Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM and Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM, however at past conferences other available Councillors have also attended.
There are pre-conference workshops planned to precede the Conference. These workshops will be held on Tuesday 20 May 2014 and full details, including travel and accommodation, will be provided at a later date.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Floodplain Management Association 54th Annual Conference - 20 to 23 May 2014 be received. 2. Council nominate delegates to the 2014 Floodplain Management Association Conference and Workshops to be held at Deniliquin from 20 May 2014 to 23 May 2014. |
Outcome 6 - We're healthy and share strong community spirit
There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
Item Page
6 Audit Committee 91
7 2012-13 Financial Statements 102
8 Pecuniary Interest Returns 104
6 |
Audit Committee |
|
Compiled by: Peter Browne, Internal Auditor
Authorised by: Stephen Britten, Chief Governance Officer
Outcome |
We have confidence in our Council |
Strategy |
Demonstrate transparency and ethical behaviour |
Service Activity |
Ensure that the organisation promotes ethical behaviour, risk management, transparent decision making and meets contemporary governance standards |
Executive Summary
This report provides information on the meeting of the
Council’s Audit Committee held on
9 October 2013. The report recommends minor amendments to Council’s Charter of
Internal Audit.
Background
The Audit Committee is comprised of the Mayor (or the Mayor’s representative), three other Councillors and three independent members appointed by Council, to advise on financial reporting, internal controls, corporate risks, business ethics, assurance and other matters as identified in its Charter. The Audit Committee Charter was created by Council resolution on 13 November 2006 and has been amended by Council 5 times, the most recent being on 5 November 2012. Council’s Charter of Internal Audit documents the agreement between the General Manager and the Audit Committee on how Internal Audit operates. One of the key functions of the Audit Committee is to monitor the Internal Audit function.
The NSW Local Government Internal Audit Guidelines (issued September 2010) provide that:
An audit committee plays a pivotal role in the governance framework. It provides councils with independent oversight and monitoring of the council’s audit processes, including the council’s internal controls activities.
Current Situation
The Audit Committee met on 9 October 2013 and adopted the draft minutes of the prior meeting (as provided to Council on 30 September 2013) without alteration. The Committee’s Charter requires the draft minutes of each Audit Committee meeting to be reported to Council and a copy of the draft minutes of the last meeting are attached to this report.
The Audit Committee discussed recent Internal Audits of Workplace Health and Safety, Council’s use of Roads and Maritime Service’s “DRIVES” database, and the Property Rates System. The Audit Committee also discussed Council’s Corporate Risks, the annual review of Internal Audit and various routine reports.
The annual report on the operations of Internal Audit concluded that the Internal Audit Charter should be updated to show current position titles. A copy of the revised Internal Audit Charter is attached to this Business Paper.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Audit Committee be received. 2. Council endorse the revised Charter of Internal Audit. |
1. View |
Audit Committee Minutes |
3 Pages |
Appendix |
2. View |
Internal Audit Charter |
6 Pages |
Appendix |
Appendix 1 - Audit Committee Minutes
UNCONFIRMED MINUTES
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING OF PENRITH CITY COUNCIL HELD IN THE PASSADENA ROOM, PENRITH
ON WEDNESDAY 9 OCTOBER 2013 AT 8:00 AM
PRESENT
His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, Frank Gelonesi (Chair), Darren Greentree and Jayant Gulwadi.
Alan Stoneham (General Manager), Peter Browne (Internal Auditor), Barry Husking (Chief Financial Officer), Stephen Britten (Chief Governance Officer), Vicki O’Kelly (Executive Manager – Corporate) and David McIllhatton (Acting Financial Services Manager).
APOLOGIES |
Members: An apology for non-attendance was received from Councillor Jim Aitken OAM. Others: An apology for non-attendance was received from Dennis Banicevic. |
ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON
Jayant Gulwadi nominated Frank Gelonesi for the position of Audit Committee Chairperson. The nomination was accepted. There were no other nominations and Frank Gelonesi was elected Chairperson for two years.
Jayant Gulwadi nominated Darren Greentree for the position of Audit Committee Deputy-Chairperson. The nomination was accepted. There were no other nominations and Darren Greentree was elected Deputy-chairperson for two years.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Audit Committee Meeting - 4 September 2013 |
AUC14 RESOLVED on the MOTION of His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, seconded Darren Greentree that the minutes of the Audit Committee Meeting of 4 September 2013 be confirmed.. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Nil.
DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
Barry Husking updated the Audit Committee on progress in developing a comprehensive list of risks. The Audit Committee asked questions on the residual risks, whether risk areas are noted in performance reviews, and how often risks are reviewed by management. Additional information on the likelihood of each issue was requested and details of the risk matrix will be provided. There was discussion of skills shortages as a source of risk. The meeting determined that a similar report should be part of routine reporting to the Audit Committee. AUC15 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Frank Gelonesi, seconded Darren Greentree That: 1. The information contained in the report on Corporate Risk Update be received. 2. A report be brought to the Audit Committee next year advising of Corporate Risks.
|
Before addressing the Workplace Health and Safety Management Audit, Peter Browne gave an overview of the “lines of defence” approach to risk management. Larger organisations tend to have multiple lines of defence in order to manage errors while smaller organisations tend to focus on ensuring the primary process does not generate errors. The staff on the ground are doing a good job of ensuring safety but there was a danger of complacency flowing from those achievements. Increased vigilance in training, monitoring and reporting was recommended by the contract auditor engaged to review Workplace Health and Safety Management. This was largely directed at enhancing policy and procedure documents. While the primary line of defence is strong, improvements to the backup processes are encouraged by the report. There was discussion of how Council’s Workplace Health and Safety performance has improved in recent years with accident statistics dropping to now be at very low levels. It was noted that some of the contract auditor’s recommendations were not practical in an organisation of Penrith’s size and range of operations. The Audit Committee determined that it would be beneficial to receive a report that put the matters in context and formally recorded the reasons why some recommendations were not practical. AUC16 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Darren Greentree, seconded Frank Gelonesi: That: 1. The information contained in the report on Workplace Health and Safety be received. 2. A further report be provided to the Audit Committee on Workplace Health and Safety. |
3 DRIVES |
Peter Browne advised the Audit Committee of the annual DRIVES audit which examines Council’s use of a Roads and Maritime Services database. The objective is to check for possible unethical use of the system. As with previous audits, no unethical use was found. AUC17 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Frank Gelonesi, seconded Jayant Gulwadi, that the information contained in the report on DRIVES be received.
|
4 Rates |
Peter Browne advised the Audit Committee of an audit of the rates function. No significant risks were found in the audit. AUC18 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Frank Gelonesi, seconded Darren Greentree that the information contained in the report on Rates be received. |
Peter Browne addressed a number of items within the report. Stephen Britten provided an update on governance issues. Alan Stoneham advised that the future direction in regard to developer contributions is unclear following significant objections being made to the last set of proposals for reform of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. AUC19 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Frank Gelonesi, seconded Darren Greentree that: 1. The information contained in the report on Standing Items be received. 2. The proposed change to the Charter of Internal Audit detailed in the report is endorsed. |
Peter Browne provided an overview of the progress report. Barry Husking updated the Audit Committee on the capacity review. AUC20 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Frank Gelonesi, seconded Jayant Gulwadi that the information contained in the report on Progress on implementing Audit Recommendations be received. |
GENERAL BUSINESS
GB 1 United Independent Pools |
Barry Husking advised the Audit Committee regarding UIP’s improvement process. There will be a review of Council’s risk management associated with this. |
GB 2 Mayoral Election |
The Committee congratulated Councillor Ross Fowler OAM on being elected Mayor. |
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9:40 am.
Appendix 2 - Internal Audit Charter
CHARTER OF INTERNAL AUDIT
In this charter the following words and terms have these meanings:
‘Council’ |
The Mayor and Councillors who have been elected or appointed to civic office
|
‘General Manager’ |
Appointed by council and responsible for the operation of the organization and implementation of council’s decisions
|
‘The organisation’ |
All operations and obligations which are the responsibility of the General Manager
|
‘Internal Audit’ |
The function which provides internal audit services to Penrith City Council
|
‘Internal Auditor’ |
The most senior person employed by the organisation working exclusively within the Internal Audit function
|
‘Audit Committee’ |
The advisory committee appointed by Council which assists it on audit, assurance and risk management matters. |
BACKGROUND
This charter identifies the purpose, authority and responsibility of Internal Audit. Internal Audit operates on the basis agreed between the General Manager and the Council as described in this Charter. This charter is intended to conform to the Internal Audit Guidelines issued by the Division of Local Government, Department of Premier and Cabinet (DLG). Pursuant to s23A of the Local Government Act, this Charter should not be changed without considering the recommendations of those guidelines. The Charter is approved by the General Manager on the advice of the Audit Committee.
The Internal Audit function must report to the General Manager or such other person as the General Manager delegates this responsibility to. The DLG guidelines recommend that this responsibility be split and that Internal Audit should report functionally to the Audit Committee and administratively to a person such that “the delegation does not directly or indirectly interfere with the ability of the Internal Auditor to conduct an internal audit function free from interference” The guidelines further recommend that the Internal Auditor confirms “at least annually, the organisational independence of the internal audit activity”.
PURPOSE
Internal Audit provides an independent and objective advisory service. It is expected that the Internal Audit function will add value by providing information to all levels of management, the Audit Committee and the Council, on the quality of the organisations operations with particular emphasis on risk management, regulatory compliance and systems of control.
It functions by conducting independent appraisals leading to reports on its findings and recommendations, addressed, as appropriate, to:
· The Audit Committee
· The General Manager; and
· All levels of management who need to know and are capable of ensuring that appropriate action is taken.
Internal Audit may use contract personnel or staff seconded from within the organisation to perform audit works, provided such appointments do not impair the objectivity of the audit process. These temporary appointments will be subject to the approval of the General Manager or delegate.
The General Manager requires Internal Audit to function with objectivity and integrity at all times, adhering to the code of ethics and standards of the Institute of Internal Auditors.
Management retains primary responsibility for assessing risks and implementing control systems. The internal Audit activity provides assurance to Management and to the Audit Committee that internal controls are effective and working as intended. The work of Internal Audit does not relieve the staff of Penrith City Council from their accountability to discharge their responsibilities.
AUTHORITY
The Internal Auditor is authorised to direct a comprehensive program of work in the form of reviews, previews, consultancy advice, evaluations, assessments, investigations of functions, processes, controls and governance frameworks in the context of the achievement of business objectives.
For the purpose of its audit work, Internal Audit has unrestricted access at all times to all the records, accounts, files, personnel, property, monies and operations of the organisation with the strict responsibility for safekeeping and confidentiality. Access to data and sensitive information system applications will be on a ‘read only’ basis.
Objectivity requires an unbiased mental attitude. As such, all Internal Audit staff shall perform their tasks in such a manner that they have an honest belief in their work product, that no significant quality compromises are made and their judgement has not been subordinated to that of others. Internal Audit does not perform line tasks as this would impair its objectivity; neither has it any direct responsibility for, nor authority over, the activities it reviews.
The Internal Auditor has direct access to the Mayor, the General Manager, the external auditors and members of the Audit Committee. This includes an unrestricted authorisation for the Internal Auditor to express any concerns and / or provide professional opinions whether those opinions are supported by Management or not. Any matter that is covered by the Code of Conduct shall be dealt with in accordance with the Code.
Internal Audit shall report:
Ø primarily to the Audit Committee
Ø to the General Manager on administrative matters
Ø to Chief Governance Officer (as the General Manager’s delegate) on staffing resourcing and administration of audit, and
Ø to the Audit Committee Chair as the representative of the Audit Committee when appropriate.
RESPONSIBILITIES
The scope of Internal Audits work aligns with the organisation’s objectives and goals.
It includes ascertaining, at all levels of the organisation, that:
· Assets are being safeguarded;
· Opportunities for fraud are minimised;
· Operations are conducted ethically, effectively and efficiently in accordance with the organisations policies and procedures;
· Records and reports of the organisation are accurate and reliable.
· Controls over computer systems are adequate; and
· Relevant laws and regulations are being complied with.
The review of significant computer systems under development, or undergoing change, is also part of Internal Audit responsibilities.
In addition, Internal Audit may perform special reviews requested by the General Manager.
Internal Audit is required to keep the Audit Committee informed of significant matters that relate to its Charter, the extent to which the Committee’s recommendations are being adopted and of Internal Audit work. A report is to be provided to the Audit Committee at each of its meetings on progress on the Internal Audit Plan, followup of recommendations, and other relevant matters.
If requested by the Audit Committee to do so, the Internal Auditor shall meet with the Audit Committee without management present.
Internal Audit shall advise the Audit Committee at least annually on performance against objectives, its opinion on the adequacy of this charter (including details of any item requiring updating) and whether there has been any compromise of audit independence since the last report.
Internal Audit shall obtain and forward to the Audit Committee:
· feedback from areas audited including stakeholder satisfaction
· an independent review of Internal Audit at least once every four years
The Internal Auditor shall periodically prepare a multi-year Internal Audit plan in consultation with senior management. The plan should be based on the goals, objectives, and business risks of Council. While the multi-year plan remains in force there shall also be an Annual Internal Audit plan. The plans shall be presented to the Audit Committee for consideration.
Internal Audit is not relieved of its responsibilities in areas of the orgainsation’s business which are subject to review by others but should always assess the extent to which it can rely upon the work of others and co-ordinate its audit planning with other review agencies.
Approved
by General Manager< Date > The
previous version of this charter is document 4121419
7 |
2012-13 Financial Statements |
|
Compiled by: Brett Richardson, Financial Accountant
Authorised by: Andrew Moore, Financial Services Manager
Outcome |
We have confidence in our Council |
Strategy |
Ensure our finances and assets are sustainable and services are delivered efficiently |
Service Activity |
Manage Council's financial sustainability and meet statutory requirements |
Previous Items: Draft 2012-13 Financial Statements - Ordinary Meeting - 23 September 2013
Executive Summary
Council staff have prepared the Financial Statements, using the accrual method of accounting, and comply with Australian Accounting Standards and the New South Wales Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting. The Financial Statements were referred to Council’s auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 23 September 2013. In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, a period of public exhibition followed. During this time no submissions were received. The final 2012-13 Financial Statements are now ready to be presented to Council with the unqualified auditor’s opinion.
Background
The Financial Statements are required to be audited by an independent auditor, and lodged with the Division of Local Government by 7 November each year.
The Local Government Act 1993 has detailed provisions for the completion of the financial statements. The process is:
1. Council staff prepare the statements
2. Council issues a statement that the accounts are in order
3. Council refers the statements to its auditors
4. The auditors complete their work and return the statements with an audit opinion attached
5. The reports are placed on public exhibition, and
6. The reports are presented with the auditor’s reports at an Ordinary Meeting.
Council completed steps 1 to 4 at its Ordinary Meeting on 23 September 2013. A copy of the report to this meeting is appended for information. An audited copy of the statements were also presented to a meeting of Council’s Audit Committee held on 4 September 2013.
The Audit Certificates have been issued. Council submitted its Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2013 to the Division of Local Government on 24 September 2013.
The audited Financial Statements have been placed on public exhibition in accordance with the requirements of the Act. Public notice has been given of Council’s intention to present these Statements to this meeting. Written submissions from the public were required to be received by the Council by 7 October 2013. No submissions were received for the 2012-13 Financial Statements.
The presentation of this report completes the final stage of the Annual Financial Statements process for 2012-13.
That the information contained in the report on 2012-13 Financial Statements be received.
|
8 |
Pecuniary Interest Returns |
|
Compiled by: Adam Beggs, Governance Officer
Authorised by: Glenn Schuil, Senior Governance Officer
Outcome |
We have confidence in our Council |
Strategy |
Demonstrate transparency and ethical behaviour |
Service Activity |
Ensure that the organisation promotes ethical behaviour, risk management, transparent decision making and meets contemporary governance standards |
Executive Summary
Chapter 14 of the Local Government Act, 1993 (the Act) concerns “Honesty and Disclosure of Interests”, and requires all elected members and designated persons to complete an initial Pecuniary Interest Return, and every year thereafter an annual return. Designated persons include the General Manager, other senior staff, and staff holding a position identified by the Council as a position of a designated person, because it involves the exercise of certain functions such as regulatory or contractual functions. First returns have to be completed and lodged within three months of becoming a Councillor or designated person. Annual returns have to be completed and lodged within three months of 30 June each year.
Current Situation
Section 450A of the Act regarding the registration and tabling of returns lodged by Councillors and designated persons is as follows:
Register
and Tabling of Returns
450A.
1. The General Manager must keep a register of returns required to be lodged
with the General Manager under Section 449.
2. Returns required to be lodged with the General Manager under Section 449
must be tabled at a Meeting of the Council, being:
(a) in the
case of a return lodged in accordance with section 449(1) - the first Meeting
held after the last day for lodgement under that subsection; or
(b) in the case of a return lodged in accordance with section 449(3) - the
first Meeting held after the last day for lodgement under that subsection; or
(c) in the case of a return otherwise lodged with the General Manager - the
first Meeting after lodgement.
A register of all returns lodged by Councillors and designated persons, in accordance with Section 449 of the Act, is currently kept by Council as required by this part of the Act.
All returns lodged by Councillors and designated persons under Section 449 of the Act must be tabled at a Council Meeting as outlined in Sections 450A(2)(a), (b) and (c) above.
The following Section 449(3) returns have been lodged:
Councillor |
Return Period |
Date Lodged |
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
24 July 2013 |
Councillor Bernard Bratusa |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
13 August 2013 |
Councillor Prue Car |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
30 September 2013 |
Councillor Marcus Cornish |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
10 September 2013 |
Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 July 2013 |
Councillor Greg Davies |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
26 June 2013 |
Councillor Mark Davies |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
10 September 2013 |
Councillor Ross Fowler OAM |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
16 August 2013 |
Councillor Maurice Girotto |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
13 August 2013 |
Councillor Ben Goldfinch |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 July 2013 |
Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 July 2013 |
Councillor Tricia Hitchen |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
18 September 2013 |
Councillor Karen McKeown |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
24 September 2013 |
Councillor John Thain |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
4 September 2013 |
Councillor Michelle Tormey |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
27 June 2013 |
Name |
Position Title |
Return Period |
Date Lodged |
Britten, Stephen |
Group Manager – Legal & Governance |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
26 June 2013 |
Burns, David |
Group Manager – City Presentation |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
5 July 2013 |
Butler, Craig |
Assistant General Manager |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
4 September 2013 |
Goldsmith, Ruth |
Group Manager - Leadership |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
11 July 2013 |
Husking, Barry |
Director |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
13 August 2013 |
Mitchell, Wayne |
Group Manager – City Infrastructure |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 July 2013 |
O’Kelly, Vicki |
Group Manager – Finance |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
24 July 2013 |
Stoneham, Alan |
General Manager |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
12 July 2013 |
Position Title |
Return Period |
Date Lodged |
|
Agar, Terry |
Place Management Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
5 September 2013 |
Alagiah, Alexx |
Asset Systems Engineer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
9 September 2013 |
Alderton, Michael |
Road Network Services Engineer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
8 July 2013 |
Bailey, Neil |
Works Coordinator - Road Maintenance |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
29 July 2013 |
Baker, Natasha |
Senior Planner |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
4 September 2013 |
Bambrick, Graham |
Customer Service Supervisor |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
1 July 2013 |
Beggs, Adam |
Governance Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 July 2013 |
Berry, Mark |
Supply Officer - Warehouse |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
31 July 2013 |
Berzins, Karl |
Permanent Contractor |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
18 September 2013 |
Blain, Kristin |
Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Blazek, Peter |
Property Management Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
1 July 2013 |
Boggs, Darrell J |
Ranger - General |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 July 2013 |
Boles, Andrew |
RID Squad Investigation Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
30 September 2013 |
Borg, Belinda |
Senior Environmental Planner DA |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
11 September 2013 |
Bradbury, Jade |
Business Coordinator Children’s Services |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
12 July 2013 |
Broderick, Mark |
Planning & Advocacy Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
18 July 2013 |
Brown, Chris |
Recreation Facilities & Programs Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
5 July 2013 |
Brown, Geoffrey P |
Waste Mgt/Contracts Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
29 August 2013 |
Browne, Peter |
Internal Auditor |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
25 September 2013 |
Bullivant, Matthew |
Senior Legal Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Burns, Amanda |
Companion Animals Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
24 September 2013 |
Butchard, Greg |
Parks Operations Co-ordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
10 July 2013 |
Butler, Wendy |
Graduate Environmental Planner |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
29 August 2013 |
Cafarella, Laurence J |
Coordinator Community Protection |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 July 2013 |
Canales, Rosemarie |
Architectural Supervisor |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
31 July 2013 |
Cattell, Allison P |
Senior Environmental Planner DA |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Catto, Ian |
Environmental Health & Building Surveyor |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
29 August 2013 |
Chaffey, Heather |
Neighbourhood Renewal Programme Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
16 September 2013 |
Chalk, Tracy |
Waste & Community Protection Manager |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 July 2013 |
Cheema, Abdul |
Senior Planner |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
16 September 2013 |
Cobb, Judy |
Neighborhood Facilities Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
24 September 2013 |
Colusso, Andrew |
Environmental Health & Building Surveyor |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
22 August 2013 |
Comer, Belinda |
Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
4 September 2013 |
Condon, Julie |
Development Enquiry & Customer Service Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
16 September 2013 |
Connell, Wendy |
Senior Corporate Planner |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
8 July 2013 |
Connor, Kelly M |
Senior Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
8 July 2013 |
Craig, Robert |
Principal Planner |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
31 July 2013 |
Credaro, Aldo |
Asset Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Cremona, Mark |
Development Engineer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
18 September 2013 |
Crichton, Anthony |
Senior Planner |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
12 September 2013 |
Cutter, Ashlee |
Casual Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
8 July 2013 |
Dalton, Teresa |
Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
16 September 2013 |
Davis, Albert J |
Animal Services Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
27 September 2013 |
De La Torre, Jeanne M |
Ranger - Parking |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
8 July 2013 |
Desmarchelier, Monique L |
Healthy Strategy Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
14 August 2013 |
Dickson, Colin |
Marketing, Partnerships & Events Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
26 July 2013 |
Doggett, Michael |
Supply Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
16 July 2013 |
Doolan, Laurie |
Ranger |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
30 September 2013 |
Doy, Phillip |
Animal Services Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
5 September 2013 |
Durie, David |
Senior Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
16 July 2013 |
Elks, David |
Property Projects Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
30 September 2013 |
Esdaile, Rodney H |
Senior Development Engineer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Estreich, Adrian |
Team Leader (Environment) |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
29 August 2013 |
Fayle, Joshua |
Human Resource Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Fernando, Ari |
Major Projects & Design Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
29 August 2013 |
Field, Craig |
City Centres Operations Supervisor |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
27 September 2013 |
Fletcher, Garry |
Development Engineer Inspector |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Fuller, Karin E |
Ranger - Parking |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
5 July 2013 |
Fuller, Noel J |
Coord Ranger & Animal Services |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
5 July 2013 |
Fulton, Carlie |
Environmental Health Officer (Compliance) |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Garas, Nabil |
Ranger - Parking |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 July 2013 |
Gardner, Christopher |
Information Management and Technology Manager |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
28 June 2013 |
Giblin, Joshua |
Human Resource Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Gillis, Stephen D |
RID Squad Snr Investigation Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
12 July 2013 |
Goodacre, Geoff E |
Customer Services Officer - Development Services |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
10 July 2013 |
Gordon, John |
Parks Manager |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
25 September 2013 |
Gowing, Tim |
Senior Waterways Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
8 July 2013 |
Graham, Peter |
Works Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
8 July 2013 |
Grimson, Paul |
Sustainability & Planning Manager |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
9 July 2013 |
Guice, Jenny |
Senior Sustainability Planner |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
2 August 2013 |
Gunner, Andrew |
HR Systems Administrator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
13 September 2013 |
Halls, Murray |
Public Domain Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
29 July 2013 |
Hamilton, Carmel |
Sustainability Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
3 July 2013 |
Hanlon, Elizabeth |
Senior Planner |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
9 July 2013 |
Hausfeld, Eric |
Development Engineering Coordinator |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
29 July 2013 |
Hawkins, Christopher |
Environmental Health & Building Surveyor |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
29 August 2013 |
Heimann, Lutz |
Public Domain Operations Supervisor |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
8 July 2013 |
Hewson, Andrew |
Sustainability Education Officer |
1 July 2012-30 June 2013 |
24 July 2013 |