20 November 2013

 

Dear Councillor,

In pursuance of the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 and the Regulations thereunder, notice is hereby given that an ORDINARY MEETING of Penrith City Council is to be held in the Council Chambers, Civic Centre, 601 High Street, Penrith on Monday 25 November 2013 at 7:30PM.

Attention is directed to the statement accompanying this notice of the business proposed to be transacted at the meeting.

Yours faithfully

 

 

Barry Husking

Acting General Manager

 

BUSINESS

 

1.           LEAVE OF ABSENCE

 

2.           APOLOGIES

 

3.           CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

Ordinary Meeting - 21 October 2013.

 

4.           DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Pecuniary Interest (The Act requires Councillors who declare a pecuniary interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)

Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Significant and Less than Significant (The Code of Conduct requires Councillors who declare a significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)

 

5.           ADDRESSING COUNCIL

6.           MAYORAL MINUTES

7.           NOTICES OF MOTION TO RESCIND A RESOLUTION

8.           NOTICES OF MOTION AND QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

9.           ADOPTION OF REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEES

Access Committee Meeting - 9 October 2013.

Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 4 November 2013.

Policy Review Committee Meeting - 11 November 2013.

Policy Review Committee Meeting - 18 November 2013.

 

10.         DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

11.         REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS

12.         URGENT BUSINESS

13.         COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE


ORDINARY MEETING

 

Monday 25 November 2013

 

table of contents

 

 

 

 

ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR

 

 

STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION OF PENRITH CITY’S ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CULTURAL HERITAGE

 

 

PRAYER

 

 

COUNCIL CHAMBER seating arrangements

 

 

meeting calendar

 

 

confirmation of minutes

 

 

PROCEDURE FOR ADDRESSING COUNCIL MEETING

 

 

MAYORAL MINUTES

 

 

report and recommendations of committees

 

 

DELIVERY program reports


 

ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR

 

 

 

Australians all let us rejoice,

For we are young and free;

We’ve golden soil and wealth for toil;

Our home is girt by sea;

Our land abounds in nature’s gifts

Of beauty rich and rare;

In history’s page, let every stage

Advance Australia Fair.

 

In joyful strains then let us sing,

Advance Australia Fair.

 

Beneath our radiant Southern Cross

We’ll toil with hearts and hands;

To make this Commonwealth of ours

Renowned of all the lands;

For those who’ve come across the seas

We’ve boundless plains to share;

With courage let us all combine

To Advance Australia Fair.

 

In joyful strains then let us sing,

Advance Australia Fair.

 



Statement of Recognition of Penrith City’s

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Cultural Heritage

 

 

Council values the unique status of Aboriginal people as the original owners and custodians of lands and waters, including the land and waters of Penrith City.

 

Council values the unique status of Torres Strait Islander people as the original owners and custodians of the Torres Strait Islands and surrounding waters.

 

We work together for a united Australia and City that respects this land of ours, that values the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage, and provides justice and equity for all.

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

PRAYER

 

 

 

“Sovereign God, tonight as we gather together as a Council we affirm that you are the giver and sustainer of life.  We come together as representatives of our community to make decisions that will benefit this city and the people within it. 

 

We come not in a spirit of competition, not as adversaries, but as colleagues.  Help us to treat each other with respect, with dignity, with interest and with honesty.  Help us not just to hear the words we say, but also to hear each others hearts.  We seek to be wise in all that we say and do.

 

As we meet, our concern is for this city.  Grant us wisdom, courage and strength.

 

Lord, help us.  We pray this in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord.  Amen.”

 

 

 

 

 


For members of the public addressing the meeting

 
Council Chambers

Text Box: Lectern

Executive Managers                          

                
          

 
Seating Arrangements

 

 

 

Acting Assistant General Manager
Ruth Goldsmith

 

 

Acting Assistant General Manager
David Burns

 

Acting General Manager
Barry Husking

His Worship the Mayor
Councillor
Ross Fowler OAM

 

Senior Governance Officer
Glenn Schuil

 

 

Minute Clerk

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


                                                        

Text Box: Public Gallery
Text Box: Managers

Executive Managers                          

         
          

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 



Council_Mark_POS_RGB2013 MEETING CALENDAR

January 2013 - December 2013

(adopted by Council 19/11/12)

 

 

 

TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUG

SEPT

OCT

NOV

DEC

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

Mon

 

Ordinary Council Meeting

7.30pm

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23^ü

(7.00pm)

 

 

16

(7.00pm)

 

25@

25

29v

27#

24 *

22

26@

30

21

25#+

 

Policy Review Committee

7.00pm

 

11

11

15

13

17

8

12

9

14

11

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 v

Meeting at which the draft corporate planning documents (Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program, Operational Plan, Resource Strategy) are endorsed for exhibition

 *

Meeting at which the draft corporate planning documents (Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program, Operational Plan, Resource Strategy) are adopted

 #

Meetings at which the Operational Plan quarterly reviews (March and September) are presented

 @

Meetings at which the Delivery Program progress reports (including the Operational Plan quarterly reviews for June and December) are presented

 ^

Election of Mayor/Deputy Mayor

 ü

Meeting at which the 2012-2013 Annual Statements are presented

 

Meeting at which any comments on the 2012-2013 Annual Statements are presented

 +

Meeting at which the Annual Report is presented

-            Extraordinary Meetings are held as required.

-            Members of the public are invited to observe meetings of the Council (Ordinary and Policy Review Committee).

Should you wish to address Council, please contact the Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil.

 


UNCONFIRMED MINUTES

 OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF PENRITH CITY COUNCIL HELD IN THE

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

ON MONDAY 21 OCTOBER 2013 AT 7:33PM

NATIONAL ANTHEM 

The meeting opened with the National Anthem.

STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM read a statement of recognition of Penrith City’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage.

PRAYER

The Council Prayer was read by the Rev Neil Checkley.

PRESENT

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM and Councillors Bernard Bratusa, Prue Car, Kevin Crameri OAM (left the meeting at 7:48 pm), Marcus Cornish, Greg Davies, Maurice Girotto, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow OAM, Tricia Hitchen, Karen McKeown, John Thain and Michelle Tormey.

 

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Leave of Absence was previously granted to Councillor Mark Davies for the period 14 October 2013 to 25 October 2013 inclusive.

 

APOLOGIES

There were no apologies.

 

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM then notified the meeting that there were three exchange students at the meeting and Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM  introduced them to those present at the meeting.  The students then  presented the Mayor with a letter from the Mayor of Fujieda City, Japan, Council’s Sister City for the past 30 years, and the Mayor read out the letter.

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Ordinary Meeting - 30 September 2013

278  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM that the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of 30 September 2013 be confirmed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS

279  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM seconded Councillor Greg Davies that Standing Orders be suspended to allow members of the public to address the meeting, the time being 7:42 pm.

 

Ms Rhiannon Czajkowski

 

Item 1 - Development Application 12/0989 Residential attached dual occupancy (No. 46) Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook

 

Ms Czajkowski, an affected neighbour, spoke in opposition to the recommendation. Ms Czajkowski stated that there are issues with noisy neighbours at this location, as well as antisocial behaviour and that she has reported this ongoing situation to the Department of Housing, to no avail.

 

280  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Marcus Cornish that an extension of time be granted to enable the speaker to complete her address, the time being 7:48 pm.

 

Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM left the meeting at 7:48 pm and did not return.

 

Ms Czajkowski concluded by stating her view that the Housing Department needs to instigate a better selection process for any future tenants and include conditions in the lease agreement to prevent ongoing antisocial behaviour and excessive noise.

 

Mr Rod Burndred

 

Item 1 - Development Application 12/0989 Residential attached dual occupancy (No. 46) Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook

 

Mr Burndred, an affected neighbour, spoke in opposition to the recommendation, and in support of Ms Czajkowski’s already stated concerns regarding noise, antisocial behaviour, as well as rubbish and a number of unroadworthy vehicles accumulating in the yard of the subject property.  He stated that he had concerns about the number of people legally occupying the property.

 

281  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that an extension of time be granted to enable the speaker to complete his address, the time being 7:55 pm.

 

Mr Burndred concluded his address by expressing concern over the privacy aspects for other neighbours as a result of the way the building is proposed to be situated.

 

 

 

 

Ms Brenda Tripp

 

Item 2 - Development Application 13/0863 Fernhill - Race Day Lots 10 & 11 (No. 1041-1117) Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa

 

Ms Tripp, the applicant, spoke in support of  the recommendation and outlined the economic, community and cultural merits of events such as the Race Day and other events on the Picnic Program.  Ms Tripp outlined the benefits to the Penrith area of holding such events and that the positive aspects need to be balanced against possible traffic concerns.

 

 

Mr Tom Lawson

 

Item 2 - Development Application 13/0863 Fernhill - Race Day Lots 10 & 11 (No. 1041-1117) Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa

 

Mr Lawson, spokesperson for  the applicant, spoke in support of  the recommendation, emphasising safety aspects.  Mr Lawson outlined a summary of the works carried out to the racetrack to bring it up to the standard required by Racing NSW and Hawkesbury Race Club and advised that the race track at Fernhill is now properly licensed.

 

 

Ms Karen Callinan

 

Item 2 - Development Application 13/0863 Fernhill - Race Day Lots 10 & 11 (No. 1041-1117) Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa

 

Ms Callinan, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the recommendation, with specific concerns about the traffic management plan.  Ms Callinan stated that, as a resident of Farm Road, she had concerns regarding traffic being diverted along Farm Road and other back roads, during such events.  Ms Callinan requested that traffic be directed along main roads in the area to avoid  the likelihood of accidents.

 

282  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor John Thain that an extension of time be granted to enable the speaker to complete her address, the time being 8:19 pm.

 

Ms Callinan concluded her address by requesting Council to keep Mulgoa residents up to date with any information regarding such events in the area, and also to ensure that any future events take into consideration her suggestion regarding traffic diversion to main roads only, during these events.

 

RESUMPTION OF STANDING ORDERS

283  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that Standing Orders be resumed, the time being 8:23 pm.

 

 

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM then advised that Council would need to move into Committee of the Whole at the conclusion of Urgent Business, to consider an urgent item.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Councillor Ben Goldfinch declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 2 - Development Application DA13/0863 - Picnic Horse Racing Event to be held on 9 November 2013 at 1041 – 1187 Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa as he is a resident of Mulgoa.

 

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, then provided an update of the status of the bushfire emergency currently affecting the Blue Mountains and surrounding areas.

 

 

Reports of Committees

 

1        Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on the 14 October 2013.                                                                                                                     

284  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Marcus Cornish that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 14 October, 2013 be adopted.

 

 

2        Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 14 October 2013                                                                                                                                     

285  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 14 October, 2013 be adopted.

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth

 

1        Development Application 12/0989 Residential attached dual occupancy (No. 46) Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook Applicant: NSW Land & Housing Corporation;  Owner: Aboriginal House Office C/- NSW Land & Housing Corporation                                                   

 

286  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Greg Davies

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Development Application 12/0989 Residential attached dual occupancy (No. 46) Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook be received.

2.     The State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 objection to the 4 metre rear set back be supported for the reasons outlined in this report.

3.    Development Application DA12/0989 for the construction of two x two bedroom attached dual occupancy at Lot 319 in  DP231310 (No.46 Ironbark Drive, Cranebrook) be approved subject to the following conditions:

3.1    Standard Conditions

          B004      Dust

B005      Mud/Soil

D001     Implement Sediment & erosion control

          D005      No fill without prior approval    

D006     No filling without prior approval

D009     Covering of waste storage area

D010     Appropriate disposal of excavated or other waste

G003     Section 73 – Sydney Water

G004     Integral energy

G005     Rainwater tank - plumbing

H039     Rainwater tank pumps

H041     Hours of work (other devt)

K202     Roads act – minor roadworks

K208     Stormwater Discharge – Minor Development

K209     Stormwater Concept Plan

L001      General Landscaping

L002      Landscaping Construction

L005      Planting of plant material

L006      Australian Standard requirements for planting and landscaping

L007      Tree protection measures

P001      Costs

P002      Fees Associated with Council Land

Q010     BASIX Certificate

 

3.2    Special Conditions

                   3.2.1.          The provision of high feature trees (Melaleuca and Angophora)                                located in the south portion of the site shall be revised to comprise of                          Grevillea and Lomandra (as identified in red) on the stamped                                     approved Landscape Concept Plan.

 

                   3.2.2.          The existing palm tree to the south of the site shall be removed as                                    identified in red, on the stamped approved Landscape Concept Plan.

,

3.2.3.          The development must be implemented substantially in accordance                                                with the following plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Drawing Title

Drawing No.

Rev

Prepared By

Dated

Site Plan

BG9SP(Sheet 2 of 9)

F

Hely Horne Perry Architects Pty Ltd

29.7.13

Ground Floor Plan

BG9SP(Sheet 3 of 9)

C

Hely Horne Perry Architects Pty Ltd

21.5.13

Elevations

BG9SP(Sheet 5 of 9)

C

Hely Horne Perry Architects Pty Ltd

21.5.13

Sections

BG9SP(Sheet 6 of 9)

C

Hely Horne Perry Architects Pty Ltd

21.5.13

Landscape Plan

BG9SP (sheet 8 of 9)

C

Hely Horne Perry Architects Pty Ltd

21.5.13

Concept Drainage Plan

BG9SP (Sheet 16986H02)

B

Hely Horne Perry Architects Pty Ltd

12.3.13

Schedule of External Finishes

-

-

Hely Horne Perry Architects Pty Ltd

-

                     

                      and stamped approved by Council and any supporting information                                  received with the application, except as may be amended by the                                         following conditions.

 

3.2.4.          The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of                              the Building Code of Australia.

 

3.2.5.          All aspects of the building design shall comply with the applicable                           performance requirements of the Building Code of Australia.

 

3.2.6.          Prior to the Occupation of the development, the Land and Housing                             Corporation shall ensure that all works within the road reserve have                                   been inspected and approved by Penrith City Council.

 

4.       A letter be sent to the Minister for Housing and the Member for Penrith                         expressing Council’s concerns regarding the previous management of the                          property and seeking effective management of this property in future.

 

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Prue Car

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

Councillor Greg Davies

Councillor Bernard Bratusa   

Councillor John Thain

Councillor Marcus Cornish

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Tricia Hitchen

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Having previously declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 2, Councillor Ben Goldfinch left the meeting, the time being 8:48 pm.

 

 

2        Development Application 13/0863 Fernhill - Race Day Lots 10 & 11 (No. 1041-1117) Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa Applicant: Brenda Tripp;  Owner: Angas Securities Limited

 

287  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Marcus Cornish

That:

1.      The information contained in the report on Development Application DA13/0863 - Picnic Horse Racing Event to be held on 9 November 2013 at 1041 – 1187 Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa is received.

2.      Development Application 13/0863 seeking consent to Conduct a Picnic Horse Racing Event to be held on 9 November 2013 at 1041 – 1187 Mulgoa Road, Mulgoa be approved subject to the following conditions:

2.01   This consent permits the running of the “Fernhill Picnic Horse Racing Event” on 9 November 2013.  Any future events on the site would require a separate application for development approval, demonstrating compliance with all conditions of this consent, must be lodged, and approval obtained, prior to operation.

2.02   The maximum number of tickets available for spectators involved in the “Fernhill Picnic Horse Racing” Event is limited to 20,000 people. Children under 14 are not included with the maximum spectator numbers. Evidence of compliance is to be provided to Penrith City Council within three (3) weeks of the event concluding.

2.03   All entertainment and trading including the operation of a Public Address and speaker system is to cease at 9.00pm on the day of the event.

2.04   The development shall comply with the provisions of the Building Code of Australia at all times, with respect to smoke and flame index of materials, emergency lighting, exit signs and fire fighting facilities.

2.05   The event shall comply with all the requirements and undertakings given to and approved by the NSW Police.

2.06   Event organisers will be available at a mutually convenient time, at the invitation of Penrith City Council and/or Penrith Police, to discuss and action agreed Community Safety or Security issues in conjunction with other local Penrith stakeholders should the need arise.

2.07   Access to car parking area, spectator areas and sanitary facilities for persons with disabilities is to be provided and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia and AS 1428 “Design for Access and Mobility”.

2.08   The temporary tent structures, stages and grandstands, when erected, are to fully comply with Part B1 and NSW Part H102 of Volume One of the Building Code of Australia. A Structural Engineer’s Certificate is to be submitted to Council prior to the event, certifying the structural adequacy of the structures.

The maximum number of patrons permitted within any part of the structures is to be clearly displayed in a prominent position on each structure.

2.09   The event structures are to be inspected by Penrith City Council at least 24 hours before the event operates for the public. Fees for the inspection are to be paid, as detailed in Penrith City Council’s Fees and Charges, and will be invoiced accordingly.

2.10   The event shall be managed in accordance with the requirements of Schedule 3A - Places of Public Entertainment of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

2.11   Portable fire extinguishers shall be provided in all areas in accordance with Australian Standard AS 2444–2001 and BCA Part E1.6, with certification submitted to Council prior to the event.

2.12   Two NSW Rural Fire Service Category 1 fire truck shall be provided on the site for the race day.

2.13   Access to the site for the NSW Fire Brigades/ Rural Fire Service/ NSW Ambulance Service is to be made available at all times during the operation of the event.

2.14   Helicopters are not to be used as a method of transporting people to and from the Fernhill Estate, except when responding to any medical emergencies.

2.15   In the event that a helicopter needs to attend the site for a medical emergency, instructions are to be provided that overhead power lines are within the site and due care is to be taken when responding to the emergency.

2.16   Bins are to be provided at Penrith Station / Penrith Paceway and removed at the conclusion of the event. The area utilized by the event at Penrith Station/ Penrith Paceway is to be satisfactorily cleaned to that of pre-event conditions.

2.17   Appropriate place barriers are to be used to direct the pedestrians towards the bus entry point at Penrith Station.

2.18   The Event Management Plans prepared by Global Event Management Pty Ltd, dated August 2013 is to be updated to include the Risk Management Plan, as referred to in this document. The report is to be submitted to Council for consideration a minimum of two weeks before the event.

Transport Management Plan

2.19   The recommendations from the Local Traffic Committee Meeting, held on 14 October 2013 are to be implemented in relation to the event (Refer to Appendix 5 to the Notice of Determination).

Potable Water Supply

2.20   A Potable Water Supply Management plan is to be provided to Council at least two weeks before the event demonstrating how potable water will be supplied to all required fixtures including food stalls, bars, showers, hand wash basins and stations, and anywhere else where a potable supply is required.

          The plan shall demonstrate how residual chlorine will be measured and recorded at the supply, delivery of water to storage tanks, and at the end use.

          The plan should also include information on storage tanks, pumps and the distribution system, tank cleaning, location of storage tanks, and the security of tanks and the water supply.

2.21   The potable water supply shall be maintained in accordance with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines 2004 and the NSW Health Private Water Supply Guidelines 2008. A residual of 0.2 to 0.5 mg/L free chlorine must be maintained in the water supply at all times.

2.22   Residual chlorine must be measured and recorded at the supply, delivery of water to storage tanks, and at the end use. Additional chlorine must be added if residuals cannot be maintained in accordance with NSW Health guidelines. Stored water shall be tested and results recorded a minimum of every 2 hours. Records must be available for Council’s Environmental Health Officers to inspect at all times.

2.23   The supply of water shall be completed in accordance with the NSW Guidelines for Water Caters (NSW Health & NSW Food Authority 2012). The carter must have approval or licensing from Sydney Water or other Water Authority to take water from their supply and the event coordinator must notify Council before the event where water is being sourced from.

2.24   Any water carter providing potable water for the event must make available to Council, for inspection, before the event their water carts, cleaning records and logs, and chlorine testing equipment. The supply of water shall be completed in accordance with the NSW Guidelines for Water Caters (NSW Health & NSW Food Authority 2012) and the carter must have approval or a license from Sydney Water or other Water Authority to take water from their supply.

Food

2.25   A detailed Food Management Plan is to be provided to Penrith City Council a minimum of two weeks prior to the event, outlining all aspects of the food supply, storage, and delivery. The food management plan should cover all food supplied to staff and the public for this event. The plan, as a minimum, should include the following:

-        Food suppliers

-        Transport of the food to the event;

-        Food storage

-        Temperature control (cool rooms etc)

-        Hand washing facilities and cleaning facilities

-        Water, electricity and gas supplies

-        Wastewater disposal

-        Garbage bins and disposal

-        Food display and fixtures

-        Construction of stalls

2.26   Penrith City Council requires all food businesses attending this event to apply to Council for an approval to sell food. This application must be submitted to Council a minimum of two weeks before the event to allow Council sufficient time to assess the applications. Late applications will not be considered or approved. Council will provide the event organiser with a list of approved food businesses prior to the event.

Application to sell food forms are available on Council’s website: www.penrithcity.nsw.gov.au

Note: A person selling food or operating stalls or mobile vans used for selling food for human consumption, including produce, fruit and vegetables, drinks, or pre-packaged food, is deemed to be a ‘food business’ under the Food Act 2003. This includes not-for-profit organisations.

2.27   Prior to the operation of the food business at this event all food businesses must notify the NSW Food Authority of their details including:

-        Contact details for the food business, including the name and address of the business and the proprietor of the business.

-        The nature of the food business.

-        The location of any other food premises associated with the food business, within the jurisdiction of NSW Food Authority.

Notification can be completed free of charge on the NSW Food Authority’s Food Notify website at www.foodnotify.nsw.gov.au.

2.28   A Food Safety Supervisor, with a current Food Safety Supervisor Certificate recognised by the NSW Food Authority, must be appointed by each individual food business prior to the event. The certificate must be available at the day of the event for inspection by Council’s Environmental Health Officers. 

2.29   The proprietor of the food business shall ensure that the requirements of the following legislation, codes, and guidelines are met at all times:

•        NSW Food Act 2003

•        NSW Food Regulation 2010

•        The Australian and New Zealand Food Standards Code

•        Guidelines for Temporary Events (NSW Food Authority 2012), and

•        Mobile food vending vehicles: Operation, construction and food handling guidelines (NSW Food Authority 2009)

2.30   Coolrooms must be supplied by the event organisers for all food vendors and power must be maintained to these coolrooms. The event coordinator is to liaise with food businesses as to their coolroom and storage needs. Cool room temperatures must be routinely monitored and temperatures recorded. An alarm system must be provided to ensure correct temperatures are maintained overnight.

2.31   Toilets must be provided for all food handlers and maintained in a hygienic condition. These toilets must be separate to other event toilets and not available to the general public, employees or officials. The toilets must be located in the immediate vicinity of the food stalls and there should be sufficient toilets to cover the needs of all food handlers. Toilets shall be supplied with a hand washing facilities that provide warm water through a single outlet and be provided with soap and paper towels.

Petting Zoo

2.32   Hand sanitiser must be readily available for people handling and coming into contact with animals. Signage must be provided directing people to the hand sanitiser and warning people of the risks associated with handling animals.

Waste and Wastewater

2.33   Temporary sanitary facilities shall be provided for the event in accordance with Table F2.3 of the Building Code of Australia.

2.34   The provisions of toilets for the event are to comply with Clause 34 of Chapter 5 in the Emergency Management Practice Manual, prepared by the Attorney General’s Department.

2.35   All toilet and wastewater facilities are be operated and located in a suitable location so not to cause water pollution either through direct flow into the dams, tributaries or through stormwater drainage system.

          In the event wastewater enters the dams, tributaries or stormwater system, immediate action is to be taken to minimise any environmental or public health impacts. In addition Council is be notified of the incident within 24           hours.

Any wastewater discharge or spill is be cleaned up immediately with the waste being disposed of by a licensed waste contractor.

2.36   All toilets and wastewater facilities are to be maintained in a clean manner for the duration of the event. The facilities are to be pumped out at a frequency deemed necessary to maintain cleanliness.

2.37   A wastewater discharge point is to be provided for food businesses by the event manager for all sullage, greywater and wastewater. No wastewater is to be discharged to the environment. All wastewater is to be transported and disposed off at a lawful and licensed facility by a NSW EPA licensed contractor. Copies of receipts are to be provided to Council.

2.38   Adequate waste and recycling facilities are to be located around the spectator area to cater of waste disposal. Separate waste and recycling facilities are to be provided for the food and refreshment business. Bins are to be located as to not cause pollution and are be frequently emptied.

2.39   Any general waste located within the local road network affected by the local traffic diversions (St Thomas Road, Farm Road & Littlefields Road) is to be removed from these locations within one (1) week of the event being held.

Noise

2.40   The services of a suitably qualified consultant is to be engaged to conduct noise testing during the event and provide an Event Acoustic Report to be submitted to Penrith City Council within twenty eight (28) days of the event.

          The Event Acoustic Report is to comply with Australian Standard AS1055 Acoustics - Description of measurement of environmental noise and New South Wales Environment Protection Authority Industrial Noise Source Policy 2000.

2.41   Noise generated by the activity after 10pm is not to exceed the Sleep Disturbance Criteria provided in the Environmental Protection Authorities Industrial Noise Policy. In the event that the continuous noise monitoring detects any exceedance, the noise levels are to be reduced immediately.

2.42   A community contact hotline (landline and mobile) by the event organiser is to be made available to the surrounding area in case noise nuisance occurs. Any complaints are to be reported to the event manager and where necessary action is to be taken to resolve the noise nuisance. The event manager if so required by an authorised officer, the acoustic consultant or the NSW Police Force must have the authority to order the reduction of noise level produced.

Two (2) weeks prior to the event being held, details of the noise complaint hotline (including landline and mobile phone) are to be distributed to residents within 500m of the property boundaries of the site.

Environmental Management

2.43   Erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed prior to the commencement of works on site. The erosion and sediment control measures are to be maintained in accordance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan(s) for the development and the Department of Housing’s “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004.

          (Note: To obtain a copy of the publication, you should contact Landcom on (02) 98418600).

          The approved sediment and erosion control measures are to be installed prior to and maintained throughout the construction phase of the development until the land, that was subject to the works, have been stabilised and grass cover established. These measures shall ensure that mud and soil from vehicular movements to and from the site does not occur during the construction of the development.

No activities are to result in the pollution of waterways.  All waterways located near the event sites (including the race track), whether ephemeral or otherwise, are to be appropriately protected with the use of sedimentation controls.  No riparian or aquatic vegetation is to be removed as part of the event.  The erosion and sedimentation controls are to be maintained until such time as any disturbed areas have been stabilised.

2.44   The ‘Fernhill Picnic Races, Fernhill Estate Mulgoa: Draft Environmental Management Plan’ prepared by GHD dated October 2013 is to be implemented and adhered to during the construction and operational phases of the event.  The checklists included in Appendix B and Appendix C is to be completed as required by the Environmental Management Plan and submitted to Council within twenty eight (28) days of the event.

2.45   The ‘Fernhill Picnic Races: Dust Management and Runoff Prevention Plan’ dated 25 September 2013 is to be implemented and adhered to during the construction and operational phases of the event in relation to all areas of the Fernhill Estate utilised for the picnic races event.

2.46   All waste generated by the horses associated with the event are to be disposed of in accordance with the existing Fernhill Estate waste management program, as outlined in the ‘Supplementary Information’ prepared by Global Event Management Pty Ltd dated September 2013.

2.47   The hosing out of the temporary horse stables/structures with water for cleaning purposes is not permitted.  Stables are to be cleaned using predominantly dry methods that limit the use of water.  Acceptable methods would include sweeping, mopping and manual collection and disposal of horse manure.

2.48   All wastewater generated by the use of the horse washbays is not to enter waterways.  This wastewater is to be captured and disposed of to an appropriately licensed waste management facility.

2.49   No trees or other vegetation (including native understorey and grass species) are to be removed, ringbarked, cut, topped, lopped or wilfully destroyed without the prior consent of Penrith City Council and in accordance with Council’s Tree Preservation Order Policy. Tree protection measures may be required where vehicles or structures will be near trees.

2.50   No fill, machinery or materials are to be placed or stored within the drip-line of any tree, unless appropriate tree protection measures are in place.

2.51   No fill material is to be imported to the site without the prior approval of Penrith City Council in accordance with Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No.20 (Hawkesbury- Nepean River) (No.2-1997). No recycling of material for use as fill material shall be carried out on the site without the prior approval of Council.

2.52   Dust suppression and minimisation strategies must be employed to manage potential dust nuisances within the site. This is to apply to parking areas, access roads and within the event site.

2.53   Mud and soil from vehicular movements to and from the site must not be deposited on the road.

2.54   All waste materials stored on-site are to be contained within a designated area such as a waste bay or bin to ensure that no waste materials are allowed to enter the stormwater system or neighbouring properties. The designated waste storage areas shall provide at least two waste bays / bins so as to allow for the separation of wastes, and are to be fully enclosed when the site is unattended.

2.55   All disturbed areas that have experienced loss of ground cover or other vegetation as a result of the event is to be rehabilitated using native seed (including when seed spraying) or plants suitable to the local community and is to be of local provenance (western Sydney) only. No exotic plants or grasses are to be used.  A list of suitable species is to be sought from a suitably qualified ecologist.

Security and Safety

2.56   The applicant must provide a combination of security personnel and paid Policing for the duration of the event. This includes a number of security guards on the site determined in conjunction with Penrith Police and agreed to by Penrith City Council 2 weeks prior to the event.

Drug and Alcohol Management

2.57   The guidelines contained in the Alcohol Management Plan must be adhered to by security and event staff to promote responsible consumption of alcohol and minimise opportunities for alcohol-related antisocial behaviour to occur.

2.58   Security personnel must be provided within the on-site car park and at each bar area for crowd control and to monitor intoxicated persons and minimise alcohol-related antisocial behaviour.

2.59   Glass containers must not be permitted, with plastic containers or cans to be used instead. All cans must be opened at the bar.

2.60   Bags shall be searched upon entry in accordance with the “Fernhill Estate Race Day Security Planning Document” provided by the applicant. Eskies shall not be permitted into the event.

2.61   Alcohol must not be brought in to the event, but must only be purchased on site from the licensed vendors. The consumption of alcohol within the car park on the site is not permitted.

2.62   Bar areas must comply with all RSA and legislative requirements concerning the sale and service of alcohol.

2.63   Free water must be provided at all bar areas and bottle refilling stations.

Crowd Management

2.64   The Crowd Control procedures provided in the “Fernhill Estate Race Day Security Planning Document” must be adhered to by security and event staff throughout the event.

2.65   Event organisers must be able to communicate with the crowd both for public announcements and in emergencies.

Major and Medical Incidents

2.66   The ‘Sydney’s Country Race Day Medical Plan’ provided by the applicant must be followed by all event staff. Training should be provided to staff to ensure they are familiar with the plans and steps that should be followed in the event of an incident or emergency.

2.67   Records should be kept of all incidents at the event, and should include details such as the date, location and time of incident, description of incident, contact details of person involved, and action taken.

Lighting and Power

2.68   Lighting is to be provided within the car park at Penrith Station and Penrith Paceway for the duration of the event.

2.69   Lighting should be provided to clearly illuminate entry and exit points, food stalls, toilets, first aid areas and stage area.

2.70   Access to the main lighting or house lights is essential in case of an emergency. The location of the controls for these lights, and the operation of the controls, must be known to those on-site responsible for emergencies.

Signage

2.71   Clear signage should be displayed throughout the event to clearly indicate entry/exit points, public transport locations, emergency help points, toilets, first aid, stage locations, telephones, vendors and licensed/non-licensed areas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Prue Car

Councillor Karen McKeown

Councillor Greg Davies

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

Councillor John Thain

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

Councillor Tricia Hitchen

 

Councillor Bernard Bratusa   

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch returned to the meeting, the time being 9:15 pm.

 

 

Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places

 

3        Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Community Cultural Grants Program 2013-14

288  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Karen McKeown

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Magnetic Places Neighbourhood Renewal Community Cultural Grants Program 2013-14 be received.

2.     The seven projects recommended by the assessment panel be funded as listed in Appendix 1.

3.     All projects not funded as listed in Appendix 2 are provided with feedback including other avenues of funding.

 

 

4        Tender Reference 13/14-07 – Construction Work for Amenities Block at Blair Oval, St Marys                                                                                                                                  

289  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 13/14-07 –Construction Work for Amenities Block at Blair Oval, St Marys be received.

2.     The tender for the construction works to BMX/Athletics Amenities for the amount of $249,900.00 (ex GST) from AUSCORP Constructions Pty Ltd be accepted.

3.     The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all documentation if necessary.

 

 Outcome 5 - We care about our environment

 

5        Floodplain Management Association 54th Annual Conference - 20 to 23 May 2014  

290  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Floodplain Management Association 54th Annual Conference - 20 to 23 May 2014 be received.

2.     Councillors Greg Davies, Jackie Greenow OAM, Jim Aitken OAM, Kevin Crameri OAM and Michelle Tormey, and any other interested and available Councillors, be Council’s delegates to the 2014 Floodplain Management Association Conference and Workshops to be held at Deniliquin from 20 May 2014 to 23 May 2014.

3.     Leave of absence be granted to those Councillors attending the Conference from 20 May 2014 to 23 May 2014 inclusive.

 

 

Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council

 

6        Audit Committee                                                                                                                

291  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Audit Committee be received.

2.     Council endorse the revised Charter of Internal Audit.

 

7        2012-13 Financial Statements                                                                                           

292  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that the information contained in the report on 2012-13 Financial Statements be received.

 

8        Pecuniary Interest Returns                                                                                               

293  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that the information contained in the report on Pecuniary Interest Returns be received.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9        Summary of Investments & Banking and the Agency Collection Methods for the period 1 September to 30 September 2013                                                                                     

294  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Summary of Investments & Banking and the Agency Collection Methods for the period 1 September to 30 September 2013.

2.     The Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer and Summaries of Investments and Performance for the period 1 September 2013 to 30 September 2013 be noted and accepted.

3.     The graphical investment analysis as at 30 September 2013 be noted.

4.     The Agency Collection Methods as at 30 September 2013 be noted.

 

 

REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS

 

RR 1          Overhanging Trees - Emu Heights                                                                         

Councillor Marcus Cornish requested a memo reply to all Councillors regarding the trimming of overhanging trees in Palomino Road and Annie Spence Close, Emu Heights.

 

RR 2          Emergency Road Link - Emu Heights                                                                   

Councillor Marcus Cornish requested a report to Council investigating the cost of providing an emergency road link between Emu Heights and Mt Riverview (also including Yellow Rock), continuing Emu Plains Road to Riverside Road, Emu Heights, or similar options.

 

RR 3          Reserve Street Carpark, Penrith                                                                            

Councillor Marcus Cornish requested a memo reply to all Councillors detailing the cost of sealing and line marking the Reserve Street carpark in Penrith, including how many cars could be accommodated.  In addition, providing information as to the future use and sale of the property.

 

RR 4          Regional Tennis Centre                                                                                           

Councillor Bernard Bratusa requested a memo reply to all Councillors providing an update on the status of the Regional Tennis Centre, in particular where it is likely to be located.

 

RR 5          Graffiti - Victoria Bridge                                                                                         

Councillor Bernard Bratusa requested a memo reply to all Councillors concerning action taken to remove graffiti from the pylons of Victoria Bridge.

 

 

 

RR 6          Great River Walk Signage                                                                                       

Councillor Bernard Bratusa requested a memo reply to all Councillors concerning graffiti on the signage for the Great River Walk.

 

RR 7          Access to Commuter Car Park, Penrith Railway Station                                    

Councillor Bernard Bratusa requested a memo reply to all Councillors concerning multiple breaches of temporary access directions to the commuter car park in North Penrith.

 

RR 8          Fernhill Development                                                                                               

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM requested a memo reply to all Councillors in response to a number of questions raised by a constituent with regard to the Fernhill development at Mulgoa.

 

RR 9          Carpark at Nepean Hospital                                                                                   

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM requested a memo reply to all Councillors providing a status report on what improvement has been made on parking issues in the vicinity of Nepean Hospital, since the new carpark at the Hospital has become operational.

 

RR 10        Proposed Football Team for South Creek                                                             

Councillor John Thain requested a memo reply to all Councillors regarding support for the establishment of a new football team for South Creek.  Councillor Thain requested that the Access Committee and other disability groups in the Penrith LGA be contacted, seeking their support.

 

RR 11        Proposed Wheelchair Rugby League Club                                                           

Councillor John Thain requested a memo reply to all Councillors with regard to the possibility of establishing a Wheelchair Rugby League Club in the Penrith area, and requesting the use of the Mayoral Column and Penrith City Council social media, as well as contacting relevant disability organisations to assist in promotion of this proposal.

 

RR 12        Carer Car                                                                                                                 

Councillor Greg Davies requested a memo reply regarding the purchase of a table for Councillors to attend the fundraising function at Penrith Paceway on the evening of Thursday, 24 October 2013.

 

RR 13        Additional Waste Collection during Christmas Period 2013-2014                      

Councillor Marcus Cornish requested a memo reply on the status of his request for additional waste collection days during the Christmas Period 2013-2014.

 

 

 

 

RR 14        School Pedestrian Crossing Flags                                                                           

Councillor Prue Car requested a memo reply to all Councillors regarding the process required of local schools to put flags on school pedestrian crossings, and in particular, to address whether school principals are being required to put the flags out themselves.

 

 

 

Committee of the Whole

 

295 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that the meeting adjourn to the Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matter, the time being 9:47 pm.

 

1        Presence of the Public

 

CW1 RESOLVED on the motion of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that the press and public be excluded from Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters:

 

 

2        Penrith Lakes                                                                                                                     

 

This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contract to the public interest.

 

 

The meeting resumed at 10:25 pm and the General Manager reported that the Committee of the Whole met at 9:47 pm on 21 October 2013, the following being present

 

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM and Councillors Bernard Bratusa, Prue Car, Marcus Cornish, Greg Davies, Maurice Girotto, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow OAM, Tricia Hitchen, Karen McKeown, John Thain and Michelle Tormey.

 

and the Committee of the Whole excluded the press and public from the meeting for the reasons set out in CW1 and that the Committee of the Whole submitted the following recommendation to Council.

 

 

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS

 

2        Penrith Lakes                                                                                                                     

RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Greg Davies

CW2 That the information regarding Penrith Lakes be received and noted.

 

 

ADOPTION OF Committee of the Whole

 

296  RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Maurice Girotto seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that the recommendations contained in the Committee of the Whole and shown as CW1 and  CW2  be adopted.

 

 

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 10:26 pm.

 



PENRITH CITY COUNCIL

 

Procedure for Addressing Meetings

 

Anyone can request permission to address a meeting, providing that the number of speakers is limited to three in support of any proposal and three against.

 

Any request about an issue or matter on the Agenda for the meeting can be lodged with the General Manager or Public Officer up until 12 noon on the day of the meeting.

 

Prior to the meeting the person who has requested permission to address the meeting will need to provide the Public Officer with a written statement of the points to be covered during the address in sufficient detail so as to inform the Councillors of the substance of the address and a written copy of any questions to be asked of the Council in order that responses to those questions can be provided in due course.

 

In addition, prior to addressing the meeting a person addressing Council or Committee will be informed that they do not enjoy any privilege and that permission to speak may be withdrawn should they make inappropriate comments.

 

It should be noted that persons who wish to address the Council are addressing a formal part of the Council Meeting. All persons addressing the Meeting should give consideration to their dress attire. Smart casual is a minimum that is thought to be appropriate when addressing such a forum.

 

It should be noted that speakers at meetings of the Council or Committee do not have absolute privilege (parliamentary privilege).  A speaker who makes any potentially offensive or defamatory remarks about any other person may render themselves open to legal action.

 

Prior to addressing the meeting the person will be required to sign the following statement:

 

“I (name) understand that the meeting I intend to address on (date) is a public meeting.  I also understand that should I say or present any material that is inappropriate, I may be subject to legal action.  I also acknowledge that I have been informed to obtain my own legal advice about the appropriateness of the material that I intend to present at the above mentioned meeting”.

 

Should a person fail to sign the above statement then permission to address either the Council or Committee will not be granted.

 

The Public Officer or Minute Clerk will speak to those people who have requested permission to address the meeting, prior to the meeting at 7.15pm.

 

It is up to the Council or Committee to decide if the request to address the meeting will be granted.

 

Where permission is to be granted the Council or Committee, at the appropriate time, will suspend only so much of the Standing Orders to allow the address to occur.

 

The Chairperson will then call the person up to the lectern or speaking area.

 

The person addressing the meeting needs to clearly indicate:

 

·     Their name;

 

·     Organisation or group they are representing (if applicable);

 

·     Details of the issue to be addressed and the item number of the report in the Business Paper;

 

·     Whether they are opposing or supporting the issue or matter (if applicable) and the action they would like the meeting to take;

 

·           The interest of the speaker (e.g. affected person, neighbour, applicant, applicants spokesperson, interested citizen etc).

 

Each person then has five minutes to make their address.  Those addressing Council will be required to speak to the written statement they have submitted.  Permission to address Council is not to be taken as an opportunity to refute or otherwise the points made by previous speakers on the same issue. 

 

The Council or Committee can extend this time if they consider if appropriate, however, everyone needs to work on the basis that the address will be for five minutes only.

 

Councillors may have questions about the address so people are asked to remain at the lectern or in the speaking area until the Chairperson has thanked them.

 

When this occurs, they should then return to their seat.

 

Glenn McCarthy

Public Officer

02 4732 7649                                                     


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


Mayoral Minutes

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

1        The passing of Warren Pinfold                                                                                           1

 

2        Typhoon Haiyan assistance                                                                                                3

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

Mayoral Minute

The passing of Warren Pinfold

Strategy: Encourage social connections and promote inclusion in our community

           

 

The late George Warren Pinfold OAM, who died at the age of 88 on 23 September this year, will be remembered for his restoration work on St Stephens Anglican Church and for proposing the Penrith Lakes Scheme.

 

Warren was born in 1925 in Newcastle. At just 14 years old he began work as a junior clerk in a Maitland mine and started studying surveying and coalmining. In 1946 he sat his mining surveyor’s certificate and of the 19 that applied, only he passed.

 

When Warren came to Blue Metal Industries in Penrith in 1956 he had been working in the mining industry for 17 years and was looking for a change. His job was to make the Penrith quarry more efficient, which he did by cutting shifts and increasing production. Over time he was given more responsibility and by 1967 was managing all BMI’s quarries in the Hunter Valley and western NSW.

 

On December 8, 1970, at a meeting of the Penrith Action for Civic Trust in the Settlers Rest, Mulgoa, Warren proposed the Penrith Lakes Scheme. He had already managed to broker agreement between three mines to quarry to their boundaries. The Council liked the idea and between 1971 and 1972 all five local quarrying companies worked together to plan the Lakes Scheme.

 

Warren received a Medal of the Order of Australia in 2004 for service to the community of Penrith through environmental rehabilitation, particularly as the proponent of the Penrith Lakes Scheme.

 

At St Stephens Anglican Church on High Street, Warren led a maintenance team which did numerous significant repairs. The team was nominated by Council for local, state and national heritage awards in 2001, 2003, and 2005. In 2003 they won the NSW Government Heritage Volunteer Award. Between them they volunteered 28,000 hours to restore the church.

 

Warren was also involved with Rotary, Masonic Lodge and was a member of Penrith Bowling Club for 57 years - its longest-serving member.

 

His great contribution to our community will be remembered.

 

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

Mayor

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the Mayoral Minute on The passing of Warren Pinfold be received.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

Mayoral Minute

Typhoon Haiyan assistance

Strategy: Encourage social connections and promote inclusion in our community

           

 

The devastation caused by Typhoon Haiyan that hit The Philippines on 8 November has touched the lives of many people living in Penrith.

 

Filipinos are a core part of our local community and are the third largest overseas-born group living in Penrith City.

 

As Penrith City Mayor I offer our sincerest condolences to those who have lost family and friends.

 

Council has close ties with the Penrith Community Filipino School which was established in our community six years ago.

 

The School’s director Dr Alexis Leones is also involved in the Philippine Language and Cultural Association of Australia. Thanks to her and many others the rich cultural heritage of Filipino Australians is understood and appreciated around our City.

 

I have spoken to Dr Leones expressing our sympathy for the loss of so many lives in the typhoon. I have offered her Council’s assistance should the Association plan to fundraise in our community.

 

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

Mayor

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the Mayoral Minute on Typhoon Haiyan assistance be received.

 

 

  


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


Reports of Committees

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

1        Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee Meeting held on 9 October 2013         1

 

2        Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 4 November 2013                                                                                                                                             8

 

3        Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 11 November 2013                                                                                                                                  14

 

4        Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 18 November 2013                                                                                                                                  26

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
 Access Committee MEETING

HELD ON 9 October, 2013

 

 

 

PRESENT

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM (Chair), Councillor Marcus Cornish, Farah Madon, David Currie, Melanie Coid, Emma Husar, Michael Morris, Denise Heath, Councillor Tricia Hitchen (arrived 5.13pm), Councillor Prue Car (arrived 5.20pm), Councillor Michelle Tormey (arrived 5.25pm).

 

IN ATTENDANCE

 

Erich Weller – Community and Cultural Development Manager, Joe Ibbitson – Community Programs Coordinator, Michael Jackson – Major Projects Manager, Graham Pares – Acting Operational Plan Coordinator, Robyn Brookes – Disability Services Officer, Hans Meijer – City Works Manager, Ben Felten – Disability Access Officer, Kate Smith – Graduate Environmental Planner, Graham Howe – Building Projects and Maintenance Coordinator, Gavin Cherry – Principal Planner, Colin Wood - Fire Safety and Certification Coordinator (arrived 5.30pm).

 

APOLOGIES

There were no apologies.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Access Committee Meeting - 14 August 2013

The minutes of the Access Committee Meeting of 14 August 2013 were confirmed.

 

BUSINESS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES

 

GB6    Bus Stops

 

Erich Weller advised that memos regarding bus stops/bus shelters and pick up and set down points in St Marys were sent out to Access Committee members on 4 October 2013.

 

Erich Weller gave an overview of the memos which had been sent out.

 

Councillor Tricia Hitchen arrived at the meeting at 5.13pm.

 

Discussion was held regarding the proposed audit of bus stops by Busways, options for access upgrades to footpaths and planning for bus shelters.

 

Councillor Prue Car arrived at the meeting at 5.20pm.

 

With regard to the pick-up and drop off matter Erich Weller advised it is important to mention that with a “no parking” zone a person can pick up and drop off for two minutes provided the driver is within 3m of the vehicle.

 

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

Nil.

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council

 

4        Update on Penrith City Website Accessibility                                                                 

Graham Pares spoke to his report regarding an Accessibility Audit Priority plan to upgrade Council’s website to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. The audit was carried out on 25 sample pages of the website to look at content, colour schemes, text alternatives for images, keyboard accessibility and navigation.

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey arrived at the meeting at 5.25pm.

 

Graham Pares advised a priority plan has been developed to achieve compliance.  This plan includes a process to bring through changes needed including use of colour and content design.  Training will be organised for the 47 content providers in the organisation. 

 

Graham Pares acknowledged the support of Access iQ during the audit process and advised that the majority of the upgrade work on the website should be completed by December.

 

David Currie acknowledged that the new website is a great improvement on the old one – it is clear and things are easier to find.  Michael Morris said it was nice the website is accessible through Chrome.

 

Graham Pares advised that upgrades to the website CMS will improve access to the website from the most used mobile devices.

 

Colin Wood arrived at the meeting at 5.30pm.

 

RECOMMENDED

That the information contained in the report on Update on Penrith City Website Accessibility be received.

 

 Graham Pares left the meeting at 5.34pm.

 

Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth

 

1        Development Applications referred to Access Committee                                             

DA13/0963        Community Facility – Village 4 Park Jordan Springs

 

Gavin Cherry introduced the development application for Village 4 Park at Jordan Springs.  The site is relatively flat, contains accessible connecting ramps and a children’s play area.

 

Issues discussed by the Committee included:

 

·    Accessible picnic tables – suggestion to vary the height

·    Incidental seating

·    Seats with arms

·    The size of the trees

·    Seating along the pathway

·    Location of pathways

·    Inclusive play space – wheelchair friendly, side by side pathways, accessible design principles

·    Barbecue area provision

·    Stormwater implications on sandstone wall

·    Part of the sandstone wall to be removed - people with disabilities could find it difficult to sit on – sections in such a way so that seating top extends – varied heights because some people prefer higher seating if they have ambulatory difficulties

·    Visibility of children.

 

DA13/0978        Active Open Space Area Glenmore Park Stage 2

 

Kate Smith advised that the development application is for the southern playing fields, two playgrounds and earthworks within Precinct D of Glenmore Park Stage 2.

 

This application includes two full size rugby fields with a cricket pitch as well as pedestrian bridge. There are two play areas – a major playground to the north-west corner of the development area and a small one to the southern portion of the site.  Carparking and some perimeter paths have already been constructed as part of the subdivision.

 

Issues discussed by the Committee included:

 

·    Play areas to be accessible and invite inclusive play

·    Separation/segregation of play spaces not conducive to family groups

·    Play area located near the roadway

·    Accessible parking

·    Operating arrangements for amenities

·    Timeframe for play area and clubhouse construction

·    Location of parking to playground.

 

Michael Morris stated that all the same considerations that applied to the first DA apply equally to this one.

 

Councillor Prue Car requested a memo come back to the Access Committee regarding the use of the amenities building, the location of the accessible parking to the playground equipment and the fencing around the sporting fields.

    

RECOMMENDED

That the information contained in the report on Development Applications referred to Access Committee be received.

 

Kate Smith and Gavin Cherry left the meeting at 6.05pm.

 

Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places

 

2        Trial Triangle Park - Make My Park Pop                                                                      

Michael Jackson presented the report regarding the Pop Up Triangle Park.

 

Issues discussed by the Committee included:

 

·    Lack of accessibility to proposed park design elements

·    Variety of seating – benches with armrests, different heights, seating with backs

·    Path of travel

·    Path of orientation for people with a visual difficulty

·    The colour of the concrete blocks

·    Keeping things as level as possible

·    TGSIs and changes in texture.

 

Michael Jackson advised that a design workshop was held on 19 September 2013. He requested feedback from the Access Committee and advised that modifications to the park will continue to be made.

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish expressed concern about the issue of all traffic now going through Riley Street which could cause congestion in this area.

 

Michael Jackson advised that the purpose of the trial period which was requested by Councillors was to evaluate whether the economic benefit to the retailers at this end of the Penrith CBD outweighed any potential traffic problems if they did occur. Detailed traffic modelling had predicted only very minimal traffic impact.

 

Erich Weller advised that various measures would be used to assess the success of the park including a community survey, the traffic outcome and the view of the local businesses.

 

It was agreed a time and date would be arranged for Access Committee members to visit the park. The details of the visit will be emailed out to members.

 

Michael Jackson advised the park could be adjusted and improved during the trial period with input from the Access Committee and if the trial was deemed successful, the permanent park design would also build upon the learnings from the trial. Feedback throughout the trial period is important and all Committee members were encouraged to provide feedback themselves and encourage their contacts to provide feedback throughout the 12 months.

 

RECOMMENDED

That the information contained in the report on Trial Triangle Park - Make My Park Pop be received.

 

The meeting held a break at 6.50pm, resuming business at 7.04pm.

 

 

 

Outcome 6 - We're healthy and share strong community spirit

 

3        All Welcome Project - Current Status                                                                             

Robyn Brookes provided an update on the status of the All Welcome Project in Penrith.  The connection between the previous presentation and the All Welcome Project was acknowledged.

 

The need to improve access to business in the Penrith CBD was highlighted in the Penrith Inclusion Plan.  To date only one business has made changes to facilitate easier access to their premises.

 

The Penrith City Centre Public Domain Masterplan has adopted access principles and references the All Welcome Project.

 

Issues discussed by the Committee included:

 

·    Engagement of businesses adjacent to the Pop Up Park as part of the activation plan

·    Acknowledgement of Gai Hawthorn’s role as CEO of the Penrith CBD Association

·    Strengthening relationship with owners of the buildings

·    Disability Standards Review in 2015

·    Sticker to promote accessibility

·    Accessibility draws business turnover to a property, increases the value, promotes social inclusiveness.

 

Erich Weller advised that discussions will continue to be held with businesses, including those adjacent to the “pop up park”, as well as continue to engage with the CBD Corporation and see what opportunities there are for access improvements.  If there is progress this information will be brought back to the Committee.

 

RECOMMENDED

That the information contained in the report on All Welcome Project - Current Status be received.

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

GB 1           Plans for Development Applications

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM opened up discussion regarding the plans for development applications to be presented at Access Committee meetings.

 

Suggestions made by Committee members included:

 

·    Plans to be shown on the screen at the meeting

·    A3 plans to be sent out to members

·    A broader location map would be useful

·    Colour maps are beneficial

·    Officers to spend time introducing the applications.

 

GB 2          Carers Event                                                                                                             

A celebration for Carers Week will be held on 18 October 2013 when 15 carers on five Harley Davidson trikes will ride from St Marys into Penrith, stopping at Council before driving back to St Marys Band Club.  NADO is the lead agency for this event.

 

GB 3          Inclusive Play Space Design                                                                                    

RECOMMENDED

That the Access Committee request Council to develop a policy setting out requirements for inclusive play space design to be incorporated into all applications for new and/or redeveloped public play recreation spaces.

 

GB 4          Shared Pathway behind Melrose Hall, Emu Plains                                              

Councillor Marcus Cornish advised that a section of the shared pathway behind Melrose Hall was being upgraded and would be a flat usable area for about a kilometre. Completion of construction of this 1.5m wide pathway is dependent on funding.

 

GB 5          Trip Hazard at Thornton Park, Thornton                                                            

Emma Husar advised of a trip hazard at a site recently constructed in Thornton Park. There is 1.5m of concrete pathway and then a grated drain. Between the drain and the concrete there is a gap. There is also a surface change where the concrete ends.

 

Erich Weller undertook to send a memo to Emma Husar on the recommended process for dealing with Council requests and complaints.

 

GB 6          Telstra Pits, Werrington                                                                                          

Hans Meijer advised that five Telstra pits on the highway near McDonalds at Werrington will be adjusted in the next week and the shared path at this location completed.

 

GB 7          Access Maps                                                                                                              

Ben Felten advised that the access maps had been handed out to Committee members.  The posters will be placed at the Tourist Information Centre, St Marys Business Centre, St Marys Corner, the foyer at Council between the Library and the airlock plus in the Community Connections Building.

 

GB 8          International Day of People with Disability                                                           

Joe Ibbitson advised of the International Day of People with Disability (IDPwD) event to be held in partnership with the Companion Card of National Disability Service on 28 November 2013.  The event will be held at Panthers and it is hoped to include some of the light and sound installations from the No Boundaries event.  The No Boundaries art group that operates in the Penrith Citizens Youth Centre (PCYC) will also be involved.

 

GB 9          No Boundaries Booklet                                                                                            

Joe Ibbitson handed out the No Boundaries booklet with a DVD on the back page.  The launch of the booklet will be held on Tuesday 5 November 2013 in the Library lower lounge area.  Erich Weller advised that an email would be sent to Access Committee members with the date and details of this event.

 

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 7:44 pm.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee meeting held on 9 October, 2013 be adopted.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
 Local Traffic Committee MEETING

HELD ON 4 November, 2013

 

 

 

PRESENT

David Drozd – Senior Traffic Engineer (Chairperson), Wayne Mitchell – Executive Manager Environment & City Development, Adam Wilkinson – Engineering Services Manager, Councillor Tricia Hitchen – Representative for the Member for Penrith, Sergeant Matt Shirvington – Penrith Police, Senior Constable Mark Elliott – St Marys Police, James Suprain – Roads & Maritime Services, Daniel Davidson – Road Safety Co‑ordinator, Ruth Byrnes - Senior Traffic Officer, Bernie Meier – Acting Engineering Co-ordinator, Martin Warda – Trainee Engineer

 

IN ATTENDANCE

Steve Grady – Busways.

 

APOLOGIES

Apologies were accepted from Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM, Councillor Karen McKeown, Councillor Marcus Cornish, and Michael Alderton – Road Network Services Engineer.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 14 October 2013

The minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting of 14 October 2013 were confirmed.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 There were no declarations of interest.

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

Outcome 3 - We can get around the City

 

1        Phillip Street, St Marys - Proposed Amendment to Parking Restrictions                    

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Phillip Street, St Marys - Proposed Amendment to Parking Restrictions be received.

2.     The existing “No Stopping” restrictions on the north-eastern side of the pedestrian facility on Phillip Street, St Marys, be reduced to 7.5m.

3.     14m of “1P 8:30am-6pm Mon-Fri, 8:30am-12:30pm Sat” restricted parking be installed adjacent to the new “No Stopping” restrictions in Phillip Street, St Marys.

 

 

2        Botany Lane, St Clair - Proposed Changes to Public Car Park                                   

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Botany Lane, St Clair - Proposed Changes to Public Car Park be received.

2.     “3P 8:30am-6pm Mon-Fri” parking restrictions be implemented for 23 spaces in the St Clair Leisure Centre off-street car park.

3.     A “Conditions of Entry” sign be installed at the entrance to the St Clair Leisure Centre car park, in Botany Lane, St Clair.

4.     All costs associated with supply and installation of new signage be funded by Council’s Recreation Department.

5.     Council’s Recreation Department be notified of Council’s resolution.

6.     Council’s Rangers be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

 

3        Swanston Street, St Marys - Proposed Changes to Parking Restrictions                     

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Swanston Street, St Marys - Proposed Changes to Parking Restrictions be received.

2.     The existing 65m of part-time “No Parking” (school days) on Swanston Street, St Marys, fronting the former Our Lady of the Rosary School campus, be changed to unrestricted parking.

3.     Mrs Tanya Davies MP Member for Mulgoa, and Our Lady of the Rosary Catholic Church be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

 

4        Hobart Street & Glossop Street, St Marys - Median Island Stop Treatment Design Plan Endorsement                                                                                                                      

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Hobart Street & Glossop Street, St Marys - Median Island Stop Treatment Design Plan Endorsement be received.

2.     Consultation be conducted with the resident affected by installation of “No Stopping” signage associated with the proposal.

3.     Subject to no substantial objections from the consultation process, Design Plan AG 144 (dated 22/10/13) for a Median Island Stop Treatment (MIST) at the intersection of Hobart Street and Glossop Street, St Marys be endorsed for construction.

4.     A lighting assessment be conducted.

 

 

5        Australia Day Event - Sunday 26 January 2014                                                             

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Australia Day Event - Sunday 26 January 2014  be received.

2.     The event applicant be advised that this is a Class 2 Event under the “Guide to Traffic and Transport Management for Special Events”, and that all conditions and requirements specified in the Guide must be complied with prior to the event.

3.     A Transport Management Plan including a Risk Management Plan be lodged by the event applicant with the Roads and Maritime Services for approval prior to the event.  A copy of the Roads and Maritime Services approval must be submitted to Council prior to the event.

4.     The event applicant obtain separate approval from the NSW Police and submit a Schedule 1 Form under the Summary Offences Act to the NSW Police prior to the event.  A copy of the NSW Police approval must be submitted to Council prior to the event.

5.     The event applicant provide confirmation of Public Liability Insurance (usually a Certificate of Currency) of minimum $10 million, prior to the event.

6.     A detailed Traffic Control Plan be prepared by a qualified and certified professional and submitted to Council, the Roads and Maritime Services and NSW Police prior to the event.  The Traffic Control Plan shall include details of the proposed speed reduction on Old Castlereagh Road.  The Traffic Control Plan shall detail how a minimum 4.0m emergency lane is maintained at all times during the event.

7.     The event applicant arrange to place barricades and provide Roads and Maritime Services accredited Traffic Controllers where required by the endorsed Traffic Management Plan.  Where the Traffic Management and Traffic Control Plan indicate Traffic Controllers are to be used, all Traffic Controllers must have current Roads and Maritime Services certification.

8.     The event applicant provide advice to Council prior to the event that the event complies with the NSW Occupational Health & Safety Act 2000 and the NSW Occupational Health & Safety Regulations 2001.

9.     The event organiser notify the Ambulance Service of NSW and fire brigades (NSW Fire Brigade and Rural Fire Service) and the State Emergency Services of the proposed event and submit a copy of the notification to Council prior to the event.

10.   The event applicant notify private bus companies of the proposed event and submit a copy of the notification to Council prior to the event.

11.   The event applicant ensure that noise control measures are in place as required by the Protection of the Environment Operations (Noise Control) Regulation 2000.

12.   Where provided, Variable Message Sign boards be located in accordance with the Roads and Maritime Services Technical Direction TDT2010/07.

13.   The applicant be advised of Council’s resolution.

 

 

6        Penrith Local Government Area - Installation of "School Zone" Flashing Lights      

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Penrith Local Government Area - Installation of "School Zone" Flashing Lights be received.

2.     Council note the information.

 

 

7        Roper Road, Colyton - Roads & Maritime Services' Proposed Extension of Right-turn Bay                                                                                                                                             

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Roper Road, Colyton - Roads & Maritime Services' Proposed Extension of Right-turn Bay be received.

2.     The Committee note the information.

 

 

8        Lockwood Road, Erskine Park - 25/26m B-Double Route Application                       

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Lockwood Road, Erskine Park - 25/26m B-Double Route Application be received.

2.     Lockwood Road, Erskine Park, from the Staples Advantage Warehouse facility to the eastern cul-de-sac end of Lockwood Road, be approved for 25/26m B-double use.

3.     The Roads and Maritime Services be advised of this matter accordingly, and be requested to publish a notice in the Government Gazette in accordance with the “Route Assessment Guidelines for B-Doubles and Road Trains”, indicating approval to use the aforementioned road as a 25/26m B-double routes.

4.     The applicant be advised of Council’s resolution.

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

GB 1          Collins Street, St Marys – Request to Review Pedestrian Crossing Facility  (Raised Council)    

Council’s Senior Traffic Engineer advised that the existing pedestrian crossing fronting the former Our Lady of the Rosary campus in Collins Street, St Marys, be reviewed and a report be submitted to the Local Traffic Committee for consideration.  A warrant and compliance audit of the crossing is to be undertaken, having regard to any future use of the redundant campus site.

 

RECOMMENDED

That a report be submitted to the Local Traffic Committee for consideration following investigation of the existing pedestrian crossing in Collins Street, St Marys.

 

GB 2          Bringelly Road, Kingswood – Request for Provision of Pavement Turning Arrows  (Raised St Marys Police Representative)                                                                                      

The St Marys Police representative referred to an item raised in June 2012, requesting the provision of pavement turning arrows on Bringelly Road, Kingswood, to address the issue of drivers turning right from the left lane at the signalised intersection with Great Western Highway.

Council’s Senior Traffic Engineer advised that this matter had been referred to the Roads and Maritime Services for their investigation in July 2012, and the RMS representative at the meeting advised that the matter had been referred to the RMS policy guidelines officer, who had not approved the request.

 

RECOMMENDED

That the Roads and Maritime Services be requested to review the decision not to implement pavement turning arrows on Bringelly Road (at Great Western Highway) and advise Council and the Police of the outcome.

 

GB 3          Russell Street, Emu Plains – Truck Parking  (Raised Penrith Police Representative)   

The Penrith Police representative raised concerns about trucks being parked in the “No Stopping” zone and across driveways on the eastern side of Russell Street, Emu Plains, near McDonalds, Red Rooster and the 7-Eleven service station.  The Police representative asked whether delineation could be improved at the “No Stopping” zone at this location, by way of narrowing the parking lane width and introducing an edge line/chevron treatment, or similar, to discourage parking.

 

RECOMMENDED

That the matter be investigated.

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed, the time being 10:00am.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 4 November, 2013 be adopted.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
 Policy Review Committee MEETING

HELD ON 11 November, 2013

 

 

 

PRESENT

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM and Councillors Marcus Cornish, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Maurice Girotto, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow OAM, Karen McKeown, John Thain and Michelle Tormey.

 

APOLOGIES

Apologies were received for Councillors Tricia Hitchen, Bernard Bratusa and Prue Car.

 

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Leave of Absence was previously requested by Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM for 11 November 2013.

Leave of Absence was granted to Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM for 11  November 2013.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Policy Review Committee Meeting - 14 October 2013

The minutes of the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 14 October 2013 were confirmed.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM declared a Pecuniary Interest in Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Outcomes of Public Exhibition (Chapter B1 – E4 Rural Lands, Castlereagh and Cranebrook) as he owns 3 properties in the area which are subject to the proposed zoning changes.

 

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM read the following statement:

 

In accordance with Section 451 of the Local Government Act, 1993 Special Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest Forms were received and tabled for the purposes of the meeting by:

 

·    Councillor Michelle Tormey in respect of 62 Joseph Street, Kingswood.

·    Councillor Marcus Cornish in respect of 13/21 Haynes Street, Penrith.

·    Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM in respect of 16,18 & 20 Pages Road, St Marys.

·    Councillor Maurice Girotto in respect of 92 Victoria Street, Werrington.

·    Councillor Karen McKeown in respect of Unit 3, 57 Regentville Road, Jamisontown.

·    Councillor Mark Davies in respect of Unit 2/155-157 Derby Street, Penrith.

·  And I have also submitted a Form in respect of my properties and associations as detailed in my pecuniary interest form, for the period ending 30 June 2013.

 

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, gave a brief overview of the process involved in the preparation of the Planning Proposal for the Penrith LEP, before introducing the Strategic Planning Manager, Paul Grimson to provide additional information.

 

The Strategic Planning Manager, Paul Grimson then  introduced  Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition and gave a background of the work undertaken by the Council over a number of years and an overview of the substantial process which has been followed during this time.

 

 

ADDRESSING THE MEETING

 

Ms Mary Vella

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Ms Vella, an affected person, spoke in support of the recommendations.  Ms Vella represented herself and other residents of Hinxman Road who support the zoning of RU4 Primary Production Small Lots for the area.  Ms Vella detailed her history as an active member of the community, before outlining her concerns with the proposed application of the E4 Environmental Living zone to certain areas.

 

An extension of time was granted to enable the speaker to complete her address, the time being 7:18 pm.

 

Ms Vella highlighted some of the land use conflicts already being experienced in the area and that agricultural land is being lost.  Ms Vella then concluded by stating that she supports the application of the RU4 Primary Production Small Lots zone for the Hinxman Road area and the E4 Environmental Living zone for the Castlecrest Estate.

 

Ms Norah Elias

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Ms Elias, an affected person, spoke in support of the recommendations,  in particular the areas proposed to be zoned E4 Environmental Living.  Ms Elias highlighted that the land is not useful for farming because of the quality of soil. Ms Elias indicated that she believed that the majority of properties are family homes with rural usage is limited to the minority of properties in the area. Ms Elias stated that she believed the changes would have little impact on existing properties, allow for ecologically sustainable use of the land, and economically enhance the properties in the area.

 

Ms Elias concluded by highlighting that existing government investment in infrastructure in Cranebrook Road would support the proposed E4 Environmental Living zone and that any potential development in the area would be supported by the area’s close proximity to the Penrith City Centre.

 


Mr John Sweeney

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Mr Sweeney, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the recommendation, in particular the proposal to zone the western end of Hinxman Road as RU4 Primary Production Small Lots. Mr Sweeney indicated that the dynamics and characteristics of the western end of Hinxman Road are changing with the building of executive homes and young families taking up residence. Mr Sweeney indicated that a group of 6-8 residents had met recently and voiced their strong opposition to the RU4 Primary Production Small Lots zone and that a number of residents from the Castlecrest Estate supported this view.

 

An extension of time was granted to enable the speaker to complete his address, the time being 7:31pm.

 

Mr Sweeney went on to state that he did not oppose the existing businesses already operating lawfully in the western end of Hinxman Road, however he is concerned about the kind of businesses that could be permitted under the RU4 Primary Production Small Lots zone which he believed could seriously threaten the things they have worked hard to achieve. Mr Sweeney concluded by urging Council to rezone all of Hinxman Rd as E4.

 

Ms Michelle Martin

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Ms Martin, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the proposal to zone the western end of Hinxman Road as RU4 Primary Production Small Lots and wanted it to be zoned E4 Environmental Living.  Ms Martin outlined her concerns with impacts that agricultural uses were having on her property and in the local area. 

 

An extension of time was granted to enable the speaker to complete her address, the time being 7:38pm.

 

In concluding, Ms Martin stated that water salinity in the area was an issue and that roads and drainage in the area are struggling with the current demand.

 

Mr Peter Schweinsberg

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Mr Schweinsberg, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the recommendations.  Mr Schweinsberg welcomed the E4 Environmental Living zoning for the Castlecrest Estate, but stated that the proposed zoning of RU4 Primary Production Small Lots at the western end of West Hinxman Road was inconsistent.  Mr Schweinsberg raised concerns with the petitions that had been lodged with Council on this matter.

 


An extension of time was granted to enable the speaker to complete his address, the time being 7:48pm.

 

In concluding, Mr Schweinsberg stated that he believed that there was a lack of notification of Council’s proposal for this area.

 

Ms Theresa Kotja

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Ms Kotja, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the recommendations and raised a number of specific questions regarding the planning proposal.  His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, advised Ms Kotja that the purpose of addressing the meeting was to advise Councillors of any issues she may have regarding the planning proposal.  Ms Kotja advised of her and the local resident’s concerns regarding social and traffic impacts from the Glossop Street proposal.

 

Councillor Maurice Girotto left the meeting, the time being 7:57pm.

 

Councillor Maurice Girotto returned to the meeting, the time being 7:59pm.

 

Ms Dani Robinson

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Ms Robinson, representing Penrith Lakes Development Corporation, spoke in opposition to the recommendations and suggested that the Penrith Lakes Scheme should be deferred from the Council’s planning proposal and the existing local planning documents applying to the Penrith Lakes Scheme be retained.

 

Mr Stephen Moran

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Mr Moran, an affected person, spoke in opposition to the recommendations and stated that the proposed zoning controls applying to his property were left out during the public exhibition process.  Mr Moran raised concerns that he is being prevented from constructing a dwelling on each of his seven lots because of flooding.  In concluding, Mr Moran suggested that Option C be considered by Council to allow him to lodge a development application.

 

Mr Colin Fragar

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Mr Fragar, Town Planner for an affected owners, spoke in opposition to the recommendation.  Mr Fragar detailed that the exhibited planning proposal allowed for the development of three lots in Castlereagh (Discussion Paper Chapter C37).  Mr Fragar advised that after the public exhibition, Council’s staff advised that there was an error in the exhibited material and that additional dwellings were not  allowed on the lots.  Mr Fragar advised that his client was only provided two weeks to respond to this change in exhibited planning controls.  Mr Fragar highlighted that due process had failed.

 

An extension of time was granted to enable the speaker to complete his address, the time being 8:07pm.

In conclusion, Mr Fragar suggested the alternative option of OC37(a) as opposed to the exhibited OC37(b).   Mr Fragar described how the blocks can accommodate an effluent disposal system, relying on a geotechnical report, and that the area has the character of a rural village.


Mr Warwick Stimson

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Mr Stimson, Consultant for a landowner, Endeavour Holdings, spoke in opposition to the recommendation.  Mr Stimson advised that the property was a residue piece of land from the delivery of Dunheved Road.  Mr Stimson then advised of a proposed new business venture for the site that the Council officers may not have been aware of at the time of writing the report for this site.  Mr Stimson stated that this new business for the area would not affect other retail centres and that it would provide benefits to users of the existing retail centre.  In concluding, Mr Stimson proposed that the zoning of the site should be in accordance with option OC39(d), namely a B2 Local Centre zone.

 

Mr Vince Hardy

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Mr Hardy, an owner’s Planning Consultant for the Werrington Signals Site, spoke in opposition to the recommendation. 

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish left the meeting, the time being 8:19pm.

Councillor Marcus Cornish returned to the meeting, the time being 8:21pm.

 

Mr Hardy raised concerns regarding the B7 Business Park zones applied to part of the Penrith Health and Education Precinct to implement the WELL Precinct Strategy, the maximum building heights and the urban zone boundary (the draft LEP has introduced an expanded E2 Environmental Conservation zone over the site, which is inconsistent with recently approved residential lots).

 

In concluding, Mr Hardy requested that the proposed zoning of E2 Environmental Conservation and that building heights be reviewed to reflect the recent development consent and existing developments in the WELL Precinct.  Mr Hardy also requested a review of the suite of  business zones for the land to which the proposed B7 Business Park zone applies.

 


Mr Con Bouzianis

 

Item 1 - Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan – Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Mr Bouzianis, an owner of property in Dharug Close, Mulgoa spoke in support of the recommendation affecting his property and wanted to express his support to the Council.

 

Procedural Motion

The meeting adjourned until 8:45pm to enable discussion of the matters before the Council.

 

The meeting reconvened at 8:45pm to discuss the Planning Proposal.

 

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth

 

Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Outcomes of Public Exhibition

 

Chapters A1-A4

 

RECOMMENDED that the recommendations relating to Chapters A1-A4 as detailed in Attachment 5 be endorsed.

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM declared a Pecuniary Interest in Chapter B1 – E4 Rural Lands, Castlereagh and Cranebrook as he owns 3 properties in the area which are subject to the proposed zoning changes. Councillor Jim Aitken OAM left the room for consideration of this matter, the time being 8:48pm.

 


Chapter B1

 

RECOMMENDED that the recommendation relating to Chapter B1 as detailed in Attachment 5 be endorsed.

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

Chapter B2

 

RECOMMENDED that the recommendation relating to Chapter B2 as detailed in Attachment 5 be amended to read that:

a.              Amend the zone boundaries of Glossop Street Precinct to limit the area to be zoned R4 High Density Residential to the west of Glossop Street and to the north of Chapel Street.

b.              That the land to the east of Glossop Street and south of Chapel Street be zoned R3 Medium Density Residential with a maximum building height of 8.5 metres. 

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 


Chapters B3,B4 & B5

 

RECOMMENDED that the recommendations relating to Chapters B3,B4 & B5 as detailed in Attachment 5 be endorsed.

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 8:55pm.

 

Chapter C37

 

RECOMMENDED that the recommendation relating to Chapter C37 as detailed in Attachment 5 be deferred until the next Ordinary Council meeting to allow for further examination and discussion.

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

Chapter C39

 

RECOMMENDED that the recommendation relating to Chapter C39 be amended to read:

That the B2 Local Centre zone be applied to Lot 2 Dunheved Road, Werrington County (Lot 2 DP 616032) and the RE1 Public Recreation zone be applied to 2 John Oxley Avenue, Werrington County (Lot 141 DP 245373 and Lot 10 DP 778605).

 

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

Chapter C43

 

RECOMMENDED that the recommendation relating to Chapter C43 as detailed in Attachment 5 be deferred until the next Ordinary Council meeting to allow for further examination and discussion.

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

Chapters C1- C48 (Excluding Chapters C37, C39 and C43)

 

RECOMMENDED that the recommendations relating to Chapters C1- C48 (Excluding Chapters C37, C39 and C43) as detailed in Attachment 5 be endorsed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

 

Chapters D1-D34

 

RECOMMENDED that the recommendations relating to Chapters D1-D34 as detailed in Attachment 5 be endorsed.

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                        

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

 


Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth

 

1        Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Outcomes of Public Exhibition                                                                                                                                             

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Outcomes of Public Exhibition be received.

2.     Council endorse the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan, as attached (Attachment 1 provided separately to Councillors and available on Council’s website), amended in accordance:

a.   Attachment 2 (Post Exhibition Changes to the Planning Proposal covering document for Penrith LEP) (excluding Chapters C37 & C43);

b.   Attachment 3 (Post Exhibition Changes to the draft Local Environmental Plan statutory instrument) (excluding Chapters C37 & C43); and

c.   Attachment 4 (Post Exhibition Changes to the Local Environmental Plan Maps) (excluding Chapters C37& C43);

d.   The recommendations of each Chapter in Attachment 5 (excluding Chapters B2, C37, C39 & C43).

3.     The General Manager be granted delegation to make any necessary minor changes required to the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan before submitting it to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure.

4.     Council endorse the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan to be forwarded to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure with a request that the Minister consider the changes made to the Planning Proposal in response to the public exhibition, and make a determination as to whether the Planning Proposal is to be re-exhibited in accordance with s58 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

5.       The Minister be requested to make the plan in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, should he determine that re-exhibition is not required.

In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:

For

Against

 

Councillor Greg Davies

 

Councillor John Thain

 

Councillor Karen McKeown

 

Councillor Michelle Tormey

 

Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM

                                                         

Councillor Maurice Girotto                      

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM

 

Councillor Mark Davies

 

Councillor Ben Goldfinch

 

Councillor Marcus Cornish

 

Councillor Ross Fowler OAM

 

 

Councillor Jim Aitken OAM stated that he had a matter concerning Fernhill and a Property Investor Article that he wished to be considered in a confidential session of the committee.

 

confidential business

 

1        Presence of the Public

 

RECOMMENDED that that the press and public be excluded from the meeting to deal with the following matter the time being 9:28pm.

 

Outcome 2

 

2        Fernhill and Property Investor Article                                                                            

 

This item has been referred to committee of the whole as the report refers to personnel matters concerning particular individuals and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

 

The meeting moved out of confidential session at 9:40pm and the General Manager reported that after excluding the press and public from the meeting, the Policy Review Committee met in confidential session from 9:28pm to 9:40pm to consider a Personnel matter.

 

The General Manager reported that while in confidential session, the Committee resolved the confidential business as follows:

 

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS

 

2        Fernhill and Property Investor Article                                                                            

RECOMMENDED

CW2 That the information on the Fernhill and Property Investor Article be received.

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9:44pm.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 11 November, 2013 be adopted.

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
 Policy Review Committee MEETING

HELD ON 18 November, 2013

 

 

 

PRESENT

His Worship the Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, Deputy Mayor, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM and Councillors Prue Car, Kevin Crameri OAM, Marcus Cornish, Greg Davies, Mark Davies, Maurice Girotto, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow OAM, Tricia Hitchen, Karen McKeown and John Thain.

 

 

APOLOGIES

Apologies were accepted from Councillors Bernard Bratusa and Michelle Tormey for their non-attendance at the meeting.

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

Nil.

 

 

DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places

 

3        St Marys Town Centre Corporation Triennial Business Plan

Place Manager, Jeni Pollard introduced the report and invited Steve Perry, Chairperson of the St Marys Town Centre Limited to give a presentation.                                                                                          

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on St Marys Town Centre Corporation Triennial Business Plan be received.

2.     Council write to the St Marys Town Centre Limited advising that Council supports is draft Triennial Business Plan.

3.     The Council Seal be affixed to the Deed of Agreement referred to in this report.

 


 

Outcome 1 - We can work close to home

 

1        Penrith City Children's Services Cooperative Ltd

Children’ Services Manager, Janet Keegan introduced the report and invited Max Friend, Chairperson of Penrith City Children’s Services Cooperative Ltd to give a presentation.

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Penrith City Children's Services Cooperative Ltd  be received.

2.     Council agree to underwrite the operation of Penrith City Children’s Services Cooperative Ltd until the presentation to Council of the Penrith City Children’s Services Cooperative Ltd Annual Report for 2013-14.

3.     The Penrith City Children’s Services Cooperative Ltd undertake a survey on the effectiveness of the current tender for child care consumables, and provide a report on the outcomes of this survey to a future Policy Review Committee meeting.

 

 

Outcome 6 - We're healthy and share strong community spirit

 

6        Penrith Aquatic & Leisure Limited (Formerly known as City of Penrith Regional Indoor Aquatic & Recreation Centre Ltd) - Annual Report and Board of Directors

Executive Manager – Environment and City Development, Wayne Mitchell introduced the report and spoke on behalf of Alan Brown, Chairman of Penrith Aquatic and Leisure Limited, who was unable to attend the meeting, and then invited Greg Crawford, General Manager of Ripples to give a presentation.               

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Penrith Aquatic & Leisure Limited (Formerly known as City of Penrith Regional Indoor Aquatic & Recreation Centre Ltd) - Annual Report and Board of Directors be received.

2.     Council agree to underwrite the operations of the Penrith Aquatic & Leisure Limited for 30 months from 1 July 2013.

 

 


 

Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth

 

2        Penrith City Centre - Car Parking Rates

Development Services Manager, Paul Lemm introduced the report.

Councillor John Thain left the meeting, the time being 8:20pm.

Councillor John Thain returned to the meeting, the time being 8:21pm.

Councillor Mark Davies left the meeting, the time being 8:25pm.                                               

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.   The information contained in the report on Penrith City Centre - Car Parking Rates be received.

2.   Council adopt a minimum commercial parking space rate of 1 space per 100m2 Gross Floor Area (GFA) as an interim policy until such time as a new parking rate is adopted in a new DCP and removed from the current LEP.

 

 

Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places

 

4        Queen Street, St Marys Streetscape Improvement Plan

Major Projects Manager, Michael Jackson introduced the report.

Councillor Karen McKeown left the meeting, the time being 8:27pm.

Councillor Karen McKeown returned to the meeting, the time being 8:30pm.                            

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Queen Street, St Marys Streetscape Improvement Plan be received.

2.     The Final Queen Street Streetscape Improvement Plan be endorsed for the staged implementation of works,

3.     The first project implemented is to be the Pedestrian lighting scheme.

 

Councillor Mark Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 8:32pm.


 

5        Our River

Major Projects Manager, Michael Jackson introduced the report.

Councillor Greg Davies left the meeting, the time being 8:35pm.

Councillor Greg Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 8:40pm.

RECOMMENDED

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Our River be received.

2.     The Final ‘Our River’ Nepean River Master Plan be endorsed for the staged implementation of works.

 

 

 

There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 8:45pm.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 18 November, 2013 be adopted.

 

 

  



DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

 

Outcome 1 - We can work close to home

 

1        Penrith Business Alliance (PBA) 2012-13 Financial Report                                              1

 

2        Tender Reference 13/14-01 Provision of Ground and Lawn Maintenance Services         3

 

Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth

 

3        Heritage Assistance Fund 2013 – 2014                                                                            13

 

4        Development Application DA13/0009 Proposed Child Care Centre at Lot 1 DP 1047731 (No. 9-11) Glenbrook Street, Jamisontown Applicant: PGH Environmental Planning;  Owner: Planloc Pty Ltd

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.                                                                                     19

 

5        Development Application DA13/1033 Proposed First Floor Addition to Existing Residence at Lot 142 DP 238553 (No. 4) Wiles Place, Cambridge Park Applicant: Cape Cod Australia Pty Ltd;  Owner: S Mahon & K Platt

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.                                                                                     57

 

6        Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Chapter C37 - Castle Street, Castlereagh

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.                                                                                     69

 

7        Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Chapter C43 - Werrington Signals Site, Corner Great Western Highway and French Street, Werrington

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.                                                                                     74

  

Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places

 

8        Tender Reference 13/14-03, Provision of Quarry Products, Top Soil, Turf, Softfall & Synthetic Turf                                                                                                                                   84

 

9        Tender Reference 13/14-05 Path Construction and Associated Works of River Road, Emu Plains                                                                                                                                           92

 

10      Great River Walk Stage 7b grant                                                                                     96

 

 

 

Outcome 5 - We care about our environment

 

11      WSROC Tender WR02-12/13, Handling and Treatment of Hazardous Waste including Asbestos                                                                                                                                         101

 

12      Complaint process and the regulations relating to uncovered loads of heavy vehicles travelling within the Penrith Local Government Area                                                                   108

 

13      Penrith City Council Floodplain Management Framework                                            111

 

Outcome 6 - We're healthy and share strong community spirit

 

14      Sports Donations and Travel Assistance Grants                                                            123

 

15      2014 Seniors Week Grants Program                                                                               130

 

16      Youth Week 2014 Program                                                                                            138

 

Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council

 

17      Organisational Performance Report - September 2013                                                  147

 

18      The Annual Report for 2012-13                                                                                     153

 

19      Council Meeting Calendar for 2014                                                                               155

 

20      Policy on the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Councillors                                                                                                                      160

 

21      2013 Local Government NSW Annual Conference                                                       184

 

22      Code of Conduct - Report on complaints statistics                                                       193

 

23      Penrith Commuter Carpark - Dedication of Roads and Creation of Easements            196

 

24      Council Property - Leasing of parts of "Community" land under Council's Plan of Management to Scouts Australia NSW                                                                                                    198

 

25      Summary of Investments & Banking for the period of 1 October to 31 October 2013 201

 

 


Outcome 1 - We can work close to home

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

1        Penrith Business Alliance (PBA) 2012-13 Financial Report                                              1

 

2        Tender Reference 13/14-01 Provision of Ground and Lawn Maintenance Services         3

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

1

Penrith Business Alliance (PBA) 2012-13 Financial Report   

 

Compiled by:               Mark Broderick, Planning Projects Co-ordinator

Authorised by:            Paul Grimson, Strategic Planning Manager   

 

Outcome

We can work close to home

Strategy

Diversify the region's economy and attract investment, particularly targeting new and emerging employment sectors

Service Activity

Build on our partnerships and alliances to achieve shared aspirations for the City's future

  

Previous Items:            Penrith Business Alliance Limited (PBA) 2013-2014 Business Plan - Policy Review Committee - 14 October 2013    

 

Executive Summary

Council’s vision for Penrith is one of a sustainable and prosperous region with a harmony of urban and rural qualities.  Continued and sustainable economic growth is a key component in the delivery of this vision.  The Penrith Business Alliance Limited (PBA) is funded by Council to meet this challenge for the City.

 

At the Policy Review Committee meeting held 14 October 2013 a report was submitted that detailed the activities of the PBA for 2012-13, highlighting some of the key achievements.  Their focus, as detailed in the PBA’s business plan, is on the strategic imperatives required to attract investment and employment opportunities, and promote the growth of Penrith as a Regional City.  Accompanying the report Mr Paul Brennan, Chairman of the PBA Board provided a presentation on the activities and highlights and also outlined the planned activities of the PBA for 2013-14.

 

In keeping with Council’s practice, the annual update and presentation by the PBA has in the past taken place following the completion of the PBA’s Financial Statements, however unfortunately the audited Financial Statements had not yet been presented to the PBA Board at the time of the Policy Review Committee meeting.  Subsequently Council resolved to accept the Penrith Business Alliance (PBA) Business Plan for 2013-2014 including a funding agreement for that period.  Council also resolved that a separate report be submitted to Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 25 November 2013 regarding the PBA’s Financial Statements following its consideration by the PBA Board on 29 October 2013.

 

Council Officers has now received the PBA’s audited Financial Statements and they are attached to this report. 

 

Council’s Financial Services Manager has reviewed the Financial Statements and has advised that while the PBA have reported a loss of $138,247 for 2012-13 (compared to a surplus of $40,566 in 2011-12) that no immediate concerns have been identified with the PBA retaining equity of $263,296 after accommodating the reported result.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the information contained in the report on Penrith Business Alliance (PBA) 2012-13 Financial Report be received.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

PBA Financial Report 2013

21 Pages

Attachment

  


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

2

Tender Reference 13/14-01 Provision of Ground and Lawn Maintenance Services   

 

Compiled by:               Jade Bradbury, Children's Services Business Coordinator

Authorised by:            Janet Keegan, Children's Services Manager    

 

Outcome

We can work close to home

Strategy

Provide access to education and training to improve residents ability to take advantage of current and future employment opportunities

Service Activity

Deliver high quality children's services

       

 

Executive Summary

A tender for the provision of Ground and Lawn Maintenance Services in the Childcare Centres was advertised on 26 and 30 July and closed on 22 August 2013.

 

This report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process and recommends that the tender from Newleaf Community Renewal be accepted for the provision of Childcare Ground and Lawn Maintenance Services on an ‘as required basis’ for a period of three (3) years, with an option to extend for a further two (2) x one (1) year periods, subject to satisfactory performance.

Tender and Evaluation Process

A tender for the provision of Ground and Lawn Maintenance Services on an ‘as required basis’ was advertised on the e-tendering website and in the Western Weekender on 26 and 30 July in the Sydney Morning Herald.  The tender closed on 22 August 2013.

 

Tenderers were required to submit their tender either by using the APET 360 online portal or a hard copy on a standard pro forma sheet, which clearly identified the required response against each of the evaluation criteria. 

 

All prospective tenderers were invited to attend a pre-tender briefing on 8 August 2013.  This briefing included an online demonstration on Council’s electronic tendering portal, and provided an opportunity for prospective tenderers to seek any necessary clarification of the specifications required to perform the scope of works.

 

The Tender Evaluation Panel consisted of Laura Schuil (Supply Officer - Contracts), Jade Bradbury (Children Services Business Coordinator) and was Chaired by Janet Keegan (Children's Services Manager).  The selection criteria advertised and used in assessing the tenders received included the following:

 

 

·    Demonstrated ability

·    Works method and program

·    Financials

·    Employment policies (apprenticeships)

·    Quality assurance systems

·    Environmental management systems

·    Work health and safety (WH&S)

·    Industrial relations

·    Commercial requirements

·    Conflict of interest.

Summary of Tenders Received

A total of 15 tenders were received. The applicants that responded to the advertised tender are provided in the table below (listed in alphabetical order):

Tenderer

Location of the business

Owners/Directors

Acland Group Pty Ltd

432 Rooty Hill Road North Oakhurst NSW 2761

Scott Acland

All Season Landscapes Pty Ltd

10 Burrells Road Menangle NSW 2568

Warren J. Linden

Australian Environmental Services Pty Ltd

Suite 6, 249 Annangrove Road Annangrove NSW 2156

Jodi Middlemiss

Complete Building Management Group Pty Ltd

PO Box 857 Concord NSW 2137

Caine Kelly (NSW)

Jay Costello (QLD)

GJ Leadbeatter and K Leadbeatter

20 Warriewood Street Woodbine NSW 2560

Glenn & Karol Leadbeatter

Hasadu Services Pty Ltd ATF The Jims Mowing Sydney Unit Trust

16/10 Gladstone Road Castle Hill NSW 2154

Peter Christian Hansen

J and JJ Developments Pty Ltd

13 Hampshire Court Cherrybrook NSW 2126

Jonathan Saad

Jims Mowing South Penrith

PO BOX 364 Kingswood NSW 2747

Andrew Larkham

Leabro Pty Ltd T/As Blades Property Maintenance

19 Grey Street Emu Plains NSW 2750

Lea Maloney

Newleaf Community Renewal

1 Wall Place Corner Tarlington Parade Bonnyrigg NSW 2177

Craig Sutherland Spotless BM/NCR Director

Richard Spencer BM/NCR BM/NCR Chair

Peter Williamson BM/NCR GM

Geoff Barnsley Spotless BM/NCR Director

William Jeffels Spotless BM/NCR Director

Skyline Landscape Services Pty Ltd

20 Anvil Road Seven Hills NSW 2147

Chris & Colin Richardson

Star Property Maintenance NSW Pty Ltd

6 Twenty Seventh Avenue West Hoxton NSW 2171

Fathi & Steven Khalil

TLC Indoor Gardens Pty Ltd

603-613 Londonderry Road Londonderry NSW 2753

Sheridan and Shane McCue

VIP Home Services - Lawns and Gardens

3 Cofton Court Werrington County NSW 2747

Darren James & Melissa Ann Dengate

Waratah Lawncare and Garden Management

20/65 Marigold Street Revesby NSW 2212

Geoff Timpson

 

Price Evaluation

 

Prices were requested for the following type of services:

 

·    Regular lawn and garden maintenance of the outdoor play area

·    Bi-monthly lawn and garden maintenance in the front car parks

·    Three monthly and annual lawn and garden maintenance tasks

·    Hourly rates for staff

A full listing of the tenders received is detailed below from lowest to highest (ex GST).

 

Company

Tendered Price (ex GST).

TLC Indoor Gardens Pty Ltd

 $48,734.38

Complete Building Management Group Pty Ltd

 $61,880.00

Star Property Maintenance NSW Pty Ltd

 $81,780.00

Acland Group Pty Ltd

 $82,275.75

GJ Leadbeatter and K Leadbeatter

 $87,510.26

Australian Environmental Services Pty Ltd

 $102,480.00

Newleaf Community Renewal

 $115,386.00

JandJJ Developments Pty Ltd

 $122,400.00

Waratah Lawncare and Garden Management

 $149,197.50

All Season Landscapes Pty Ltd

 $197,110.00

Jims Mowing South Penrith

 $200,170.00

Leabro Pty Ltd T/As Blades Property Maintenance

 $226,800.00

Skyline Landscape Services Pty Ltd

 $327,420.00

VIP Home Services - Lawns and Gardens

 $356,824.00

Hasadu Services Pty Ltd ATF The Jims Mowing Sydney Unit Trust

 $406,198.00

 

Criteria Evaluation

 

Following the evaluation of the fifteen (15) tenders, the Tender Evaluation Panel determined that the costs submitted by Hasadu Services Pty Ltd, ATF The Jims Mowing Sydney Unit Trust, VIP Home Services, Skyline Landscape Services Pty Ltd, Leabro Pty Ltd T/As Blades Property Maintenance prices were excessive in comparison to the others tendered and the Tender Evaluation Panel determined that there was no advantage to Council in considering their tenders any further.

 

The remaining eleven tenderers were then assessed for capability and cost:

 

·    TLC Indoor Gardens Pty Ltd

·    Star Property Maintenance NSW Pty Ltd

·    Complete Building Management Group Pty Ltd

·    Acland Group Pty Ltd

·    GJ Leadbeatter and K Leadbeatter

·    Australian Environmental Services Pty Ltd

·    Newleaf Community Renewal

·    JandJJ Developments Pty Ltd

·    Waratah Lawncare and Garden Management

·    All Season Landscapes Pty Ltd

·    Jims Mowing South Penrith

 

Capability

 

Following the capability assessment against the evaluation criteria the Tender Evaluation Panel determined that the tenders submitted by Newleaf Community Renewal, Warratah Lawncare and Garden Maintenance and Acland Group Pty Ltd demonstrated a much higher level of ability against the evaluation criteria than the offers submitted by TLC Indoor Gardens Pty Ltd, Complete Building Management Group Pty Ltd, Star Property Maintenance NSW Pty Ltd, GJ Leadbeatter and K Leadbeatter, Australian Environmental Services Pty Ltd, J and JJ Developments Pty Ltd, All Seasons Landscapes Pty Ltd and Jims Mowing South Penrith.  For the latter tenderers, the particular areas of concern are listed below:

 

·     TLC Indoor Garden Pty Ltd: Allocation of staff hours was not realistic given the quality and standards required.

·     Star Property Maintenance NSW Pty Ltd: Lack of qualified staff combined with an unrealistic price increase after the first two years of the contract. The company has identified that they would increase their price by 10% in year three, then 10% in year four and then a further 5% in year five. Over the term of the tendered contract this would equate to $103, 901.50. Based on these significant increases, concerns were raised over the quality of work that Star Property Maintenance could provide noting that for the first 2 years of the contract, they would be paid $35,220 less then what they are currently receiving as the incumbent. Star Property Maintenance has also had some challenges over the last three years in achieving and maintaining the quality of service Children’s Services has expected by such a contract.

 

·     Complete Building Management Group Pty Ltd: Allocation of staffing resources and hours are not realistic given the quality and standards required. Limited information was also provided on WH&S and Environmental sustainable practices.

·     GJ Leadbeatter and K Leadbeatter:  Provided limited information regarding how the company planned to complete the lawn and garden maintenance tasks across all of the services (considering time constraints, hourly cost, resource costs and location). Limited information was provided for staff recruitment, training and development and equal employment opportunity.

·     Australian Environmental Services Pty Ltd: Staff hours and schedule not realistic to complete required tasks to the quality and standard required.

·     JandJJ Developments Pty Ltd: Provided limited information regarding how the company would plan to complete lawn and garden maintenance tasks across all of the services (considering time constraints, hourly cost, resource costs and location). Limited information was provided for staff recruitment, training and development and equal employment opportunity.

·     All Seasons Landscapes Pty Ltd: The Company did not specify the number of team members allocated to complete each of the tasks. The hourly rate was high compared to the other tenderers.

·     Jims Mowing South Penrith: Staff hours and schedule not realistic to complete required

tasks to the standard required.

Cost

 

The annualised cost for each of the remaining tenderers is shown in the following table. Also included is the number of annual staff hours allocated to complete all the lawn and garden maintenance tasks. A benchmark of 2,400 annual staff hours was used to evaluate the time it would take to complete the regular, bi-monthly, three- monthly and annual services.

 

Company

Tendered Price (ex GST)

Allocated Annual Staff Hours to Complete tasks

TLC Indoor Gardens Pty Ltd

 $48,734.38

1,238

Complete Building Management Group Pty Ltd

 $61,880.00

3,063

Star Property Maintenance NSW Pty Ltd

 $81,780.00

2,336

Acland Group Pty Ltd

 $82,275.75

2006

GJ Leadbeatter and K Leadbeatter

 $87,510.26

1,988

Australian Environmental Services Pty Ltd

 $102,480.00

1,863

Newleaf Community Renewal

 $115,386.00

2,508

JandJJ Developments Pty Ltd

 $122,400.00

2,720

Waratah Lawncare and Garden Management

 $149,197.50

2,712

All Season Landscapes Pty Ltd

 $197,110.00

1,576

Jims Mowing South Penrith

 $200,170.00

1,819

 

Comments

 

The number of staff hours allocated by TLC Indoor Gardens Pty Ltd and All Seasons Landscapes Pty Ltd were substantially lower than the benchmark hours allocated to complete the tasks. The hours allocated by Complete Building Management Group Pty Ltd were excessively high given the hourly total cost allocated to complete the tasks.  On the information provided it appears that limited expenditure has been factored into the price to cover their materials and overhead costs. The Panel therefore was of the opinion that the hours allocated were not realistic to undertake the work in the tender to a high standard. Accordingly, the tenders for these three companies were not considered further by the Panel. The tendered price submitted by Jims Mowing South Penrith was substantially higher in comparison to the other tendered prices and the Tender Evaluation Panel determined that there was no advantage to Council in considering this tender further.

Referral of the Tender to the Children’s Services Cooperative Board

 

At the Board’s Meeting on 22 August 2013, the Council’s Children’s Services Business Coordinator advised on the progress of the tender for the lawn and garden maintenance and indicated that the tender review process had commenced.

 

Shortlisted Tenderers

 

Following phases one and two of the evaluation process the Tender Evaluation Panel determined that the following tenderers were the most advantageous to Council and were shortlisted for further evaluation:

 

·    Newleaf Community Renewal

·    Warratah Lawncare and Garden Maintenance

·    Acland Group Pty Ltd

 

Comments on Shortlisted Tenderers

 

Newleaf Community Renewal

Newleaf Community Renewal is a Public Benevolent Institution that aims to alleviate the social, emotional and physical hardship suffered by poor, disadvantaged and disabled residents of the Fairfield and Liverpool local government areas with priority given to such residents in the suburb of Bonnyrigg. Newleaf is the result of a Public Private Partnership (PPP) between a consortium known as Bonnyrigg Partnerships (BP) and Housing New South Wales to revitalise the community of Bonnyrigg. The project commenced on 20 April 2007. The Newleaf project has a 30 year horizon that focuses on an 81 hectare site which houses a mixed tenure community with a very high level of public housing.

 

Green Wings is a not for profit social enterprise employment  program of Newleaf Community Renewal which creates employment and training opportunities for young people who are socially disadvantaged or are long term unemployed. Green Wings provides property care services, training, and employment to local residents of the Liverpool and Fairfield areas. They currently undertake the lawn and garden maintenance of 1300 aged and disabled homes in the Liverpool and Fairfield area. They also have a contract with Fairfield City Council to manage the Tarlington Reserve Bushland rejuvenation project as well as maintain blister gardens and restore verges in the Fairfield LGA.

 

A referee check with Fairfield City Council highlighted the quality of work as being of a high standard combined with the robust policies and processes implemented to ensure that work is done correctly.

Warratah Lawncare and Garden Maintenance

 

Waratah Lawncare and Garden Maintenance has been providing services in all aspects of horticulture since 1997. Waratah has been engaged by Macquarie Links Estate at Ingleburn to provide routine regular and non routine grounds maintenance for the entire Estate consisting of 365 homes and 120 villas. The company has been responsible for mowing, edging, pruning, pest and weed control, lawn aerating and garden maintenance on a routine basis, as well as non-routine re-plantings and tree management services, such as removals and pruning.

 

Acland Group Pty Ltd

 

The Acland Group Pty Ltd was established in 1995 as an electrical company. Acland Group Pty Ltd currently employs a large number of trade people, office and support staff and operates under numerous contracts. The company specialises in responsive 24 hour maintenance repairs and scheduled works and provides solutions and services in all aspects of electrical, plumbing, air conditioning, minor building works, property and grounds maintenance. The Acland Group currently manages 800 dwellings for Housing NSW and are responsible for the provision of gardening services including lawns, edges, gardens, gutters, pressure cleaning, mulching, tree trimming and graffiti removal.

 

Preferred Tenderer

 

Each tenderer shortlisted was assessed against the tender evaluation criteria and the individual price submitted. The assessment process showed that all shortlisted tenderers were capable of providing the service required. However, Newleaf Community Renewal offered the best annual prices based on their allocation of staffing hours to maintain each of the sites.

 

Acland Group Pty Ltd offered the most competitive price; however the Tender Evaluation Panel had concerns over the number of staffing hours that were allocated to manage the regular and annual services at each of the sites. In their costing evaluation Acland Group Pty Ltd offered an hourly range depending on whether the work was completed during the week or over the weekend. If the work was completed during the week their hourly rate allocated was $41.00 (which is what the hourly evaluation total in the table above was calculated on); however if the work was completed on Saturday their hourly rate is $52.00 and on Sunday $58.00. As most of the work under this tender is completed on the weekend, there were concerns with the hours allocated to complete the regular and annual service. The company allocated only 1.65 hours on average to complete regular maintenance which includes grass mowing, trim edges, weeding garden beds, raking sandpits, removing rubbish and trimming trees and shrubs.  For their annual service they only allocated an average of 2.8 hours to fertilise, top dress and bindii treat all lawn areas as well as top up sandpits.

 

Newleaf Community Renewal, on the other hand, allocated three hours on average to complete the regular service and between 10 to 20 hours to complete the annual service which provided a better representation and understanding of the different childcare sites and their size. Newleaf Community Renewal advised that they would allocate a supervisor (appropriately qualified) that was directly responsible for the Penrith Council’s Children’s Services Contract. Additionally, the company provided extensive details on their environmental policy and WH&S processes and procedures.

Conclusion

Based on the detailed evaluation, analysis of staffing levels provided, compliance requirements, quality control and cost rankings, the tender that represents the most advantage to Council was received from Newleaf Community Renewal and they are recommended for appointment by the Tender Evaluation Panel. The company demonstrated through their tender, interview process and reference checks that they have an excellent understanding of the scope of requirements and have provided a sound methodology for ensuring a high quality of service.

 

The Panel is cognisant that the recommended tenderer is not the cheapest but the Panel is confident that the company will provide effective lawn and garden maintenance that is comparable with the amount spent in 2012/13 ($117,000.00). Newleaf Community Renewal pays its staff in accordance with the Gardening and Landscape Award 2010.

 

The Tender Evaluation Panel is of the opinion that Newleaf Community Renewal has provided the most advantageous tender and it is recommended that the company be awarded the contract for an annual amount of $115,386.00 ex GST.

Financial Services Manager’s Comment

The adoption of a sole supplier will ensure that the Council can continue to ensure value for money for Ground and Lawn Maintenance service across our Childcare Centres. The contract will be established on an as required basis and as such, all works completed will be undertaken within established operational budgets.

Tender Advisory Group (TAG) Comment

The Tender Advisory Group (TAG) consisting of the Chief Governance Officer, Stephen Britten and the Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil, met to consider the tender for the provision of ground and lawn maintenance. The TAG made a number of enquiries with the Tender Evaluation Panel regarding the evaluation of the shortlisted tenderers. Taking into account the additional information provided by the Panel, the TAG supports the recommended tenderer contained within this report.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 13/14-01 Provision of Ground and Lawn Maintenance Services be received.

2.     Newleaf Community Renewal be awarded the contract for an annual amount of $115,386.00 ex GST for the Provision of Ground & Lawn Maintenance Services.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.  


Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

3        Heritage Assistance Fund 2013 – 2014                                                                            13

 

4        Development Application DA13/0009 Proposed Child Care Centre at Lot 1 DP 1047731 (No. 9-11) Glenbrook Street, Jamisontown Applicant: PGH Environmental Planning;  Owner: Planloc Pty Ltd

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.                                                                                     19

 

5        Development Application DA13/1033 Proposed First Floor Addition to Existing Residence at Lot 142 DP 238553 (No. 4) Wiles Place, Cambridge Park Applicant: Cape Cod Australia Pty Ltd;  Owner: S Mahon & K Platt

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.                                                                                     57

 

6        Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Chapter C37 - Castle Street, Castlereagh

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.                                                                                     69

 

7        Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Chapter C43 - Werrington Signals Site, Corner Great Western Highway and French Street, Werrington

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.                                                                                     74

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

3

Heritage Assistance Fund 2013 – 2014   

 

Compiled by:               Clare Aslanis, Graduate Environmental Planner

Authorised by:            Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager   

 

Outcome

We plan for our future growth

Strategy

Protect the City's natural areas, heritage and character

Service Activity

Facilitate quality development that contributes to a growing regional City

       

 

Executive Summary

Council’s Heritage Assistance Fund (HAF) has been operating since 2007.  The fund is to assist owners, lessees and not-for-profit organisations in repair and maintenance works to properties listed in the Penrith Heritage Local Environmental Plan (LEP) as a heritage item or located within a heritage conservation area. The funding is not offered to commercial properties, or businesses.

 

The 2013/2014 Heritage Assistance Fund has a budget of $20,420.00.  This amount is comprised of Council’s Funding and reimbursement of last year’s funding from the NSW Office of Heritage in July this year. The nomination period opened from 6 September 2013 and closed on Tuesday 22 October 2013. A total of seven (7) applications were received and assessed by Council’s Heritage Advisor and Council’s Environmental Planner. The results of this assessment process recommended funding being offered to five (5) applications.  Council’s Heritage Committee has endorsed the assessment of the applications and recommendation, awarding funding to five (5) applications on the basis of the best value in relation to the assessment criteria.

Background

The aims of the Heritage Assistance Fund are to:

·      Encourage the repair and maintenance of domestic scale heritage items and promote a positive community attitude to heritage conservation;

·      Provide a mechanism to achieve the conservation of specific elements that are considered important to an area such as streetscapes, buildings fabric and façade, and physical evidence of heritage items;

·      Promote a greater awareness, understanding and appreciation of heritage within Penrith City.

 

The funding assists in the promotion of a positive community attitude to heritage conservation and provides greater awareness, understanding and appreciation of heritage within Penrith City.

 

Applications Received and Assessment Process

A total of seven (7) applications for funding have been received in 2013 with proposed works consisting of re-painting, roof repairs, building repairs, roof downpipes, Conservation Management Plan, repairs to damaged brickwork and ceiling works. (See Appendix 1 – Heritage Assistance Matrix 2013 - 2014).

 

The applications were assessed by Council’s Heritage Advisor and Council’s Environmental Planner. The applications were assessed against the ‘Assessment Matrix’ criteria as follows: 

 

Criteria 1: Conservation work required to the item and urgent projects to avert a threat to a heritage item. Projects subject to conservation controls where the owner is able to show hardship arising from conservation work required to the item.

 

Criteria 2: Projects that have satisfied submission requirements: details of proposed works and schedule of the specific works to be undertaken, submission of quotes.

 

Criteria 3: Demonstrates the proposed work is appropriate from a heritage point of view and would encourage the conservation of other heritage items and not reconstruction.

 

Criteria 4: Projects that demonstrate value to the community. Projects that are highly visible to the public, e.g. the replacement of a verandah to a building in a main street location.

 

The quality and clarity of information provided was also taken into account. Two (2) of the applications were unsuccessful as the proposed works were reconstruction works and not restoration works or the applicant was a commercial business.

Successful Applicants

Five (5) of the seven (7) applications have been recommended to receive funding. The recommended successful applications have been reported to and endorsed by Council’s Heritage Advisory Committee at its meeting on Wednesday, 30 October 2013.

The successful applicants are listed in the table below:

 

Heritage Item & Address

Item

Proposed Description & Reason for the project

Total Project cost

(AS PER QUOTE)

Council Funding

($1 for $1)

1.

Ronald Haydon - 26-28 Nepean Street EMU PLAINS

Yodalla House & Garden

Replacement of 3 window frames and 3 lengths of timber flooring

$905.30

$453

  2.

Emu Plains Uniting Church -  5-7 Emerald Street EMU PLAINS

Uniting Church

Paint, repair broken windows, replace door hinges, stonemason repointing, replace mortar

$13,014.90

$5,000

  3.

Luddenham Progress Association - 3091 The Northern Road LUDDENHAM

Luddenham Progress Hall

Painting and replacement of awning

$17,300

$5,000

  4.

Jason Daley - 32 Nixon

 Street EMU PLAINS

Yamba - cottage

Roof maintenance and replacement

$12,000

$5,000

  5.

Matthew Snelson - 299-311 Great Western Highway ST MARYS

 

St Mary Magdalene Church, Cemetery, Hall & Grounds

Conservation Management Plan

$4,750

$2,375

 

 

TOTAL

$17,828

 

Due to the lack of eligible applicants this year, the budget has not been reached and as a result it is recommended that the remaining $2,592 be divided in half and allocated evenly to the projects at 5-7 Emerald Street, Emu Plains and 3091 The Northern Road, Luddenham. This will mean that each of these applicants will receive an additional $6,296, which is a positive outcome due to the extent and need for these works.

 

Next Steps

All applicants will be advised of the status of their application. Applications which involve building works require development approval through the development application (DA) process. An applicant may apply, in writing, to Council to have development application and, construction certificate fees refunded for approved development for the restoration works.

 

Consultation and inspections with applicants will be undertaken until completion of all restoration works. Funding will be issued upon completion of all restoration works. 

 

Conclusion

Penrith City Council has a commitment and responsibility to the conservation of the City’s cultural and environmental heritage. Some of the applications received involve significant costs for the restoration works proposed. Completion of the 5 projects proposed to provide funding to will provide a positive contribution towards these goals.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Heritage Assistance Fund 2013 – 2014 be received.

2.     The successful applicants for the 2013/2014 Heritage Assistance Fund outlined be endorsed by Council and advised accordingly.

3.     The unsuccessful applicants for the 2013/2014 Heritage Assistance Fund outlined be advised accordingly.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

Heritage Assistance Matrix 2013 - 2014

2 Pages

Appendix

  


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                          25 November 2013

Appendix 1 - Heritage Assistance Matrix 2013 - 2014

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

4

Development Application DA13/0009 Proposed Child Care Centre at Lot 1 DP 1047731 (No. 9-11) Glenbrook Street, Jamisontown  Applicant:  PGH Environmental Planning;  Owner:  Planloc Pty Ltd    

 

Compiled by:               Tania  Shephard, Consultant Environmental Planner

Authorised by:            Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager   

 

Outcome

We plan for our future growth

Strategy

Facilitate development that encourages a range of housing types

Service Activity

Delivery timely assessment, regulation and certification of development and building work in accordance with statutory requirements

      

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

Executive Summary

Council is in receipt of a development application for alterations to an existing building (previously used by Pet Goods Direct) and the subsequent use for a 108 place child care centre.  The site is zoned part IN2 Light Industrial and part SP2 Infrastructure – Classified Road under the provisions of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP 2010).  The SP2 zone is located along a portion of the Mulgoa Road frontage of the site.  The portion of the site affected by this development is zoned IN2 Light Industrial.  A childcare centre is permissible in the zone with Council’s consent.  The application is reported to Council given the location of the site, the nature of the use and in light of submissions received.

The development application was placed on public exhibition from 9 January 2013 to 31 January 2013 and six submissions were received.  The concerns raised in those submissions are addressed in this report.

An assessment of the proposed development has been undertaken under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.  The assessment of the application has revealed some challenges with the application, which will be discussed throughout this report.  However, on balance, the application is recommended for approval subject to conditions.

 

Site and Surrounds

The subject building was most recently used by Pet Goods Direct and is currently vacant.

The building is located on a parcel of land that also contains Toys R Us, Barbeques Galore, BCF (Boating, Camping & Fishing) and a restaurant.  These uses are located within a larger, separate building on site. 

The site is located on the eastern side of Mulgoa Road, it is an irregular shape with a total area of 1.686 hectares. 

A secondary street frontage is provided to Glenbrook Street.  Access to the site from Glenbrook Street is currently available for delivery vehicles via a driveway off Glenbrook Street, however, no other direct access to Glenbrook Street from the site is provided.  (This application will remove the opportunity for vehicular access from Glenbrook Street.) 

Access to the site off Mulgoa Road is available via a signalised intersection.  The site can be accessed from the adjacent Blaikie Road or from Mulgoa Road heading south, however, there is no right turn into the site from Mulgoa Road heading north.  Exiting from the site onto Mulgoa Road is to the north or south or via Blaikie Road.  Currently, there is unauthorised access to the site via the adjoining commercial property (Red Rooster), which would be removed as part of this development.

Within the vicinity of the proposed development, the site contains an easement to drain sewage 6 metres wide along the eastern boundary of the site.  An easement for underground cables and easement for padmount substation is located along the western boundary of the site adjoining commercial land uses.  These easements do not compromise the operation of the development.

The site contains existing trees and shrubs in the vicinity of the development.  It is proposed to retain these trees and shrubs as part of the development.

To the south and east, the surrounding area is characterised by residential development with a mix of single and two storey buildings.  To the north and west, the surrounding area is characterised by “Bulky Goods” / Industrial development.  Immediately adjoining the site to the west is a Red Rooster restaurant and a BP service station accessed separately off Mulgoa Road.

Refer to Appendix No. 1 for a locality plan.

 

The Proposed Development

The proposed development is for alterations to an existing building and the subsequent use of the building for a 108 place child care centre.  The number of children proposed to be cared for in each age group is as follows:

0 - 12months        18 children

1 – 2 years           20 children

2 – 3 years           35 children

3 – 5 years           35 children

The proposed development includes:

·        Alterations and additions to the existing building, including an increase in floor area of 56m2.

·        4 internal playrooms/areas for children.

·        2 outdoor play areas.

·        The provision of a 2 metre high acoustic fencing along the western boundary and Glenbrook Street frontage of the site.

·        Acoustic treatment to the existing 2.2 metre high fence at the rear of No 1 and 2 Kay Close (adjoining residential properties).

 

The existing car parking provided on the site totals 231 spaces. Alterations to the car park area will result in a total of 218 car parking spaces being provided on the site.  A total of 36 car parking spaces will be provided for this development.

 

It is proposed to modify the existing car parking layout on site in order to accommodate the development and provide a separation between the car parking for the child care centre and the other land uses on site.  This is achieved through the provision of an additional circulation aisle forward of car parking associated with the child care centre. 

 

The proposed hours of operation are from 7am to 7pm Monday to Friday. 

 

In accordance with the Children (Education and Care Services) Supplementary Provisions Regulation 2012, a total of 19 staff are required to care for children.  The ratio for staff to children is as follows:

 

1:4 for children 0-2 years – 10 staff

1:8 for children 2-3 years – 5 staff

1:10 for children 3-6 years – 4 staff

 

The application proposes a total of 25 staff to be employed at the premises which includes staff required for administration, cooking and cleaning.

 

No advertising signage is proposed as a part of the Development Application.

 

No operator has been nominated for the development with one being sought should development approval be obtained.

Refer to Appendix No. 2 for copies of the site plan, floor plan and elevations submitted with the application.

 

The Development Application has been accompanied by the following related documents:

 

·    Architectural Plans – WAH Architects Pty Ltd

·    Landscape Plan – Monaco Designs P/L

·    Statement of Environmental Effects – PGH Environmental Planning

·    Noise Assessment Report – Rodney Stevens Acoustics

·    SEPP 33 Hazard Analysis & Emergency Evacuation Plan

·    Traffic Assessment – Traffix Traffic and Transport Planners

·    Waste Management Plan

·    Schedule of External Finishes

 

Planning Assessment

The development has been assessed in accordance with the matters for consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended) (EP&A Act), and having regard to those matters; the following issues have been identified for further consideration.

 

1.   Section 79C(1)(a)(i) – Any Environmental Planning Instrument

Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury / Nepean River (SREP 20)

SREP 20 applies to the land and stipulates that the consent authority shall not grant consent to an application unless it is of opinion that the carrying out of the development is consistent with any relevant, general and specific aim of SREP 20.  The proposal does not contradict any of the policies specified in the SREP.  Appropriate stormwater controls and sediment and erosion controls will reaffirm this.

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 33 – Hazardous and Offensive Development (SEPP 33)

The application is required to be assessed with regard to the provisions of SEPP 33 given the location of the site within close proximity to the adjoining BP Service Station along Mulgoa Road.  A child care centre is defined as being a “sensitive” land use and the NSW Planning Hazardous and Offensive Development Application Guidelines - Applying SEPP 33 recommends exclusion zones for sensitive land uses from LPG automotive retail outlets.

The application has been accompanied by a SEPP 33 Hazard Analysis (Dangerous Goods Assessment) which has been assessed by Council’s Environmental Health Officer.  The application has also been accompanied by an emergency evacuation plan in the event that an evacuation from the premises is required.

Australian Standard 1596:2008 'LP Gas Storage and Handling' identifies the proposed child care centre as a ‘sensitive’ land use and a 55m buffer distance is therefore required between the land use and the remote LPG fill point associated with the existing BP service station. The Hazard Analysis (Dangerous Goods Assessment) demonstrates that a 55m buffer distance is achieved.

(It is noted that there are 10 above ground LPG storage cylinders on the BP Service Station site.  In accordance the Hazardous and Offensive Development Application Guidelines - Applying SEPP 33, these storage facilities are not considered hazardous or offensive development as they are less than 10 tonnes or 16m3 of above ground LPG storage.  An exclusion zone is only required from the LPG fill point.)

The information submitted is sufficient to conclude that location of the childcare centre, although within close proximity of the adjoining BP Service Station, satisfies the requirement of SEPP 33. 

It is noted, however, that the location of the development does not satisfy the requirements of DCP 2010 which requires that a child care centre not be located on land within an 85 metre radius of a service station.  It is understood that the intent of this requirement is to address concerns relating to hazardous and offensive development, although the source of the 85 metre requirement is unclear.  Given that the application has satisfied the provisions of SEPP33, it is considered that the intent of this requirement under DCP 2010 has been satisfied.

Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP 2010)

Permissibility

The site is zoned part IN2 Light Industrial and part SP2 Infrastructure – Classified Road under the provisions of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP 2010).  The SP2 zone is located along a portion of the Mulgoa Road frontage of the site.  The portion of the site affected by this development is zoned IN2 Light Industrial.  A childcare centre is permissible in the zone with Council’s consent.

Zone Objectives

The proposed development is consistent with the objectives of the IN2 Light Industrial zone which are as follows:

 

•  To provide a wide range of light industrial, warehouse and related land uses.

 

Comment: The proposed use contributes to the wide variety of land uses within the zone.

 

•  To encourage employment opportunities and to support the viability of centres.

 

Comment: The proposed use provides employment opportunities and will support the viability of the centre

 

•  To minimise any adverse effect of industry on other land uses.

 

Comment: Whilst this development is not an industrial use, measures are proposed to minimise any potential adverse effect on adjoining and adjacent residential land.  This includes the provision of an acoustic fence and complementary landscaping.

 

•  To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of workers in the area.

 

Comment: The provision of a child care centre in this location meets the day to day needs of workers in the area. 

 

•  To support and protect industrial land for industrial uses.

 

Comment: This development is not an industrial use, however, a child care centre is considered a more appropriate use of the existing building given the nature of other land uses on site and the proximity of residential land uses.

 

•  To promote development that makes efficient use of industrial land.

 

Comment: This development does not compromise this objective, again noting that a child care centre is considered a more appropriate use of the existing building given the nature of other land uses on site and the proximity of residential land uses.

 

 

Development Standard

The relevant development standards under LEP 2010 are addressed in the following table:

 

Standard

Requirement

Proposed

Compliance

Clause 5.1

Nominates the RMS as the relevant acquisition authority for land within the SP2 zone

The proposed development is not located on this area of the site.

Clause 5.6

Requirements for the design of architectural roof features

An addition of 56m2 is proposed.  No alterations are proposed to the existing roof line.

The roof line of the addition is lower in height than the existing roof line.  The extension contributes to the articulation of the building. Complies.

Clause 5.9

Preservation of trees or vegetation.

No trees are proposed to be removed as part of this application.

Complies

Clause 6.5

Measures to be taken to minimise the visual impact of the development from major roads, identified heritage items and other public places

The site is located within an area identified as having scenic and landscape values. 

Complies – see comment below.

 

Clause 6.5 – Protection of Scenic Character and Landscape Values

Clause 6.5 of LEP 2010 requires Council to consider the visual impact of the development when viewed from major roads, identified heritage items and other public places.  The site is visible from both Glenbrook Street and Mulgoa Road.  The development proposes a small extension to the existing building along the western elevation.  This extension has a maximum height of 3.85metres and is lower in height than the roof line of the existing building.  The extension contributes to the articulation of the built form given that the western elevation is currently a solid wall devoid of architectural features.

In addition, it is proposed to construct a 2 metre high acoustic fence along the western boundary and Glenbrook Street frontage of the site.  This fence will be visible from both Glenbrook Street and Mulgoa Road.  The applicant has advised that they intend to locate the fencing as follows:

·    A minimum 500mm setback, with 1.5metre insets, is to be provided along the Glenbrook Street frontage of the site.

·    A minimum 500mm setback is to be provided along the western boundary (adjoining the Red Rooster site). 

Landscaping is to be provided forward of the acoustic fence.  A recommended condition of approval will require the submission of a revised landscape plan that provides additional screen landscaping to reduce the visual impact of the acoustic fence when viewed from Glenbrook Street and Mulgoa Road (refer to Special Condition No.3.15). The provision of complementary landscaping will reduce the visual impact of this fence as limit opportunities for vandalism.

The provision of the acoustic fence has the potential serve as a visual barrier to the building.  This is generally not a desirable outcome.  It is preferable for a development to provide a well designed, articulated building that serves as a quality design element within the landscape.  However, on balance, it is considered that this application should be supported as proposed fence will be articulated and adequately designed to create more than just a standard structure.  This response although needed to facilitate the proposed use will provide for an improvement in the visual impact of the existing building when viewed from Glenbrook Street and Mulgoa Road.  In light of this, the development satisfies the requirements of Clause 6.5 of LEP 2010.

A photomontage of the proposed acoustic fencing is provided in Appendix No. 4. 

2.   Section 79C(1)(a)(ii) – Any Draft Environmental Planning Instruments

 

The site is proposed to be zoned part B5 – Business Development and part SP2 – Classified Road (small portion along the Mulgoa Road frontage) under the provisions of Draft Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 (DLEP 2010) which was advertised from 13 May 2013 to 5 July 2013.  A child care centre is permissible with Council’s consent in the proposed B5 zone. 

 

The land is also identified as having scenic and landscape values under DLEP 2010.  Clause 7.5 of DLEP 2010 requires Council to consider the visual impact of the development from major roads and other public places.  This issue is consistent with the current requirements under Clause 6.5 of LEP 2010 which have been addressed previously.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the requirements of the draft planning instrument.

3.   Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) – Any Development Control Plan

Penrith Development Control Plan 2010 (DCP 2010)

DCP 2010 is applicable to the site.  Section D5.2 of DCP 2010 outlines Council’s requirements with respect to child care centres.  The relevant requirements under Section D5.2 of DCP 2010 are addressed in Appendix No. 5. Further discussion of specific DCP considerations is provided under the following heading, “The Likely Impacts of the Development.”

 

4.   Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of the Development

 

Built Form and Character

The development proposes a small (56m2) addition to the western side of the building.  This addition has a maximum height of 3.85metres and is lower in height than the roof line of the existing building.  This addition provides for additional articulation of the existing building. The scale of development is consistent with that existing on site and other commercial development within the area. 

It is proposed to construct a 2 metre high acoustic fence along the western boundary and Glenbrook Street frontage of the site.  As discussed previously, this fence is to be setback from the property boundaries in order to provide for complementary landscaping.  It is considered that, on balance, the provision of the acoustic fence, with associated landscaping, will provide an improvement in the visual impact of the existing building.

No existing trees are proposed to be removed as a result of this development.  This will assist ensuring that the development integrates with the existing streetscape whilst, at the same time, effectively screening the development from Glenbrook Street and Mulgoa Road.

Traffic, Access and Parking

A traffic assessment has been submitted as part of the application and assessed by Council’s Senior Traffic Engineer.  It is proposed to access the site via the existing signalised intersection at Mulgoa Road.  Through this intersection, the site can be accessed from the adjacent Blaikie Road or from Mulgoa Road heading south, however, there is no right turn into the site from Mulgoa Road heading north.  Exiting from the site onto Mulgoa Road is to the north or south or via Blaikie Road. 

Given that there is not right turn into the site from Mulgoa Road heading north, there is concern that the traffic impacts of this development may be “externalised” as vehicles seek alternative routes to access the site.  This is difficult to control and is a failing with this development site.

Currently, there is unauthorised access to the site via the adjoining commercial property (Red Rooster), which would be removed as part of this development.  There is not legal provision in place for this access route which, given its unauthorised nature, presents a potential for traffic and pedestrian conflict and also has resulted in the loss of car parking spaces for both this site and the adjoining Red Rooster site.  This development provides an acoustic fence along the shared boundary of these sites and therefore access to this site off Glenbrook Street is physically prevented.  This is a positive outcome resulting from this development.

The existing service access to the site from Glenbrook Street will also be removed as part of this development.  Conditions of consent are recommended in order to ensure that no vehicles park in Glenbrook Street to access the site.  This includes a condition requiring the extension of the “No Stopping” zone across the Glenbrook Street frontage of the site (refer Special Condition 3.25)

DCP 2010 requires that a child care centre site shall not be located on a designated road unless the safe operation of the road and amenity of children is not affected.  Council’s Senior Traffic Officer has advised that this control aims to limit direct access to designated roads.  A driveway with direct access to a designated road has the potential for increased vehicular and vehicular and pedestrian conflict.  This development does not have direct access Mulgoa Road being accessed via the existing signalised intersection.

The traffic assessment which accompanied the proposal addressed traffic generated by the existing commercial businesses on site as well as the estimated traffic generation resulting from the child care centre.  Council’s Senior Traffic Engineer provides the following comments:

The traffic report estimates the traffic generated by the existing retail business and the traffic generated by the proposed child care centre.  The difference is estimated to be an increase of 77 vehicles per hour during the am peak period (2 hrs) and 48 vehicles per hour in the pm peak period (2 hrs).   This averages to 1 additional vehicle per minute during peak periods, Monday to Friday only, which is minimal.  Any queuing of vehicles leaving the site at the signals will occur on private road, which has no flow on impacts to surrounding roads. 

 

Traffic generated during other times of the day is reduced from the existing retail situation.

 

No adverse traffic impacts are expected from the additional traffic generated by the development and it is anticipated that the surrounding road network will have adequate spare capacity to cater for this traffic generation during peak times.

 

In accordance with the Children (Education and Care Services) Supplementary Provisions Regulation 2012, a total of 19 staff are required to care for children.  The ratio for staff to children is as follows:

 

1:4 for children 0-2 years – 10 staff

1:8 for children 2-3 years – 5 staff

1:10 for children 3-6 years – 4 staff

 

The application proposes a total of 25 staff to be employed at the premises which includes staff required for administration, cooking and cleaning.

 

The existing car parking provided on the site totals 231 spaces. Alterations to the car park area will result in a total of 218 car parking spaces being provided on the site.  A total of 36 car parking spaces will be provided for this development.  An accessible car parking space is provided for the development near the pedestrian access to the building. 

 

It is proposed to modify the existing car parking layout on site in order to accommodate the development and provide a separation between the car parking for the child care centre and the other land uses on site.  This is achieved through the provision of an additional circulation aisle forward of car parking associated with the child care centre.  This is a positive design feature of the development.  Signage can be provided to ensure that visitors to the site are aware of the location of the child care centre car parking, and a condition is recommended in this regard (See Special Condition 3.25.  Car parking for the child care centre will be marked accordingly. 

 

The following table addresses the required parking provision for the entire site:

 

On site car parking provision

 

 

Description

Existing area (m2)

Proposed area (m2)

DCP 2010 car parking rate

Car parking required

 

BCF

1,440

NA

Bulky goods: 1 per 50m2 gross floor area

29 spaces

 

Barbeques Galore

1,123

NA

Bulky goods: 1 per 50m2 gross floor area

23 spaces

 

Toys R Us

1,900

NA

Bulky goods: 1 per 50m2 gross floor area

38 spaces

 

Restaurant

550

NA

Restaurants: 1 per 5.5m2 of seating area or 1 per 4 seats, whichever is the greater, plus 1 space per employee

Based on 450m2 being allocated for seating (worst case scenario)

73 spaces

 

Proposed child care centre

661

56

Child care centre: 1 per 10 children as a drop-off and pick-up parking area for visitors plus one per employee

108 children requires 11 spaces plus 25 employees = 36 spaces

 

Total car parking required

199

 

Existing car parking provided

231

 

Proposed car parking

218

 

 

 

The car parking requirements for child care centres under DCP 2010 differs from that under DCP 2006.  DCP 2006 has been the relevant control for recent child care centre applications reported to Council.  DCP 2010 requires 1 car parking space per 10 children as a drop-off and pick-up parking area for visitors plus one per employee.  As shown in the above table, a total of 36 car parking spaces are required under the provisions of DCP 2010.

 

DCP 2006 requires 1 car parking space per 4 children.  1 car parking space shall also be provided for each additional staff member where child care centres are catering for younger children, or children with special needs, and the ratio of staff to children is increased.  Under the DCP 2006 controls, the development would be required to provide a minimum of 27 car parking spaces plus an additional 7 car parking spaces given the number of children between the ages of 0-3 being cared for at the centre.  (73 children are to be cared for between the ages of 0-3.  This would normally require 8 staff but the higher staff to child ration requires 15 staff which is 7 extra.  Thus, 7 additional car parking spaces are required.)  A total of 34 car parking spaces would be required under the provisions of DCP 2006.  This application is providing a higher number of car parking spaces than that required under DCP 2006.

 

The change of Regulations (Children and Care Services Regulations) in 2016 may require the ratio of staff to children for the 2-3years age group to increase from 1:8 to 1:5.  This will result in the need for an additional two staff for the centre.  This can be accommodated within the site given that there is an excess of car parking spaces available.

 

Recommended conditions of approval will require:

·        36 car parking spaces to be dedicated to the child care centre.  These spaces are to be appropriately marked.

·        All car parking and manoeuvring to be in accordance with AS2890.1:2004 and AS2890.6:2009 and Council’s requirements.

·        No vehicular or pedestrian access is permitted via Glenbrook Street or any adjoining site.  (This is physically restricted through the provision of the acoustic fence.)

·        The extension of the “No Stopping” zone across the Glenbrook Street frontage of the site is to be implemented prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

·        The gates to the car parking area at the rear of Toys R Us are to remain open during business hours.  (These gates are shut after business hours to reduce the amount vandalism that was occurring prior to the gates installation.)

See Special Condition No’s 3.22 to 3.25.

 

The application has satisfied Council staff with respect to the safe movement of vehicles and pedestrians on site and the ability for emergency and delivery vehicles to access the site.

 

Noise

A noise assessment report has been submitted with the application.  This report recommends operational controls to ensure compliance with relevant noise criteria.  In addition, the report recommends the provision of a 2 metre high acoustic fencing along the western boundary and Glenbrook Street frontage of the site and acoustic treatment to the existing 2.2 metre high fence at the rear of No 1 and 2 Kay Close (adjoining residential properties).  (The visual impact of this acoustic fencing, when viewed from Glenbrook Street and Mulgoa Road, has been addressed previously in this report.)  The additional acoustic treatment at the rear of No 1 and 2 Kay Close involves the provision of a new inner fence with 1metre of flexi glass, Perspex or similar material provided at a 450 angle at the top of fence facing towards the child care centre.  The operational recommendations include:

·  The car parking spaces adjacent to the rear of 3, 4 and 5 Kay Close are not to be used prior to 7:00am.

·  Distressed and crying children should be taken inside immediately.

·  The side doors facing the rear of 1 and 2 Kay Close are to be fitted with self closing devices and closed at all times other than to allow entry/egress.

·  Children must be supervised at all times.

Council’s Environmental Health officer is satisfied with the acoustic details provided subject to recommended conditions of consent.  Recommended conditions relating to acoustic compliance include:

·  Limitations on the hours of operation and the hours for deliveries and service vehicles.

·  Limitations on the use of outdoor play areas.

·  Limitations on the maximum number of children to be cared for at the centre (108).

·  Certification of construction works and noise criteria controls.

·  A Noise Management Plan is to be submitted to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

·  Conditions relating to contact numbers for noise complaints and the keeping of a complaint register. In addition, the requirement for a further noise assessment should there be ongoing complaints.

·  Controls on the hours of operation for construction.

See Special Conditions No. 3.8 to 3.20.

Social and Economic

The proposed child care centre will provide a social and economic benefit to the community through the provision of child care along a main travel route and the provision of additional employment opportunities. 

 

5.   Section 79C(1)(c) – The Suitability of the Site for the Development

 

There are some notable challenges concerning the development site and the development itself.  These are:

·  The location of the site relative to the existing BP service station (within the 85metre exclusion zone required under DCP 2010).

·  The need for acoustic walls along the western and Glenbrook Street frontages.

·  The inability of vehicles to turn right into the site when travelling from the south.

 

However, on balance, the application is considered worthy of support give that it does satisfy other relevant planning controls as outlined in this report. 

The subject site is located along a main travel route (Mulgoa Road) for people accessing the Penrith City Centre and for major public transport links.  The site presently contains a number of commercial uses that will not conflict with the operation of the child care centre which is to be located within a separate building on site at a distance from these other uses.  The site is accessed via a signalised intersection at Mulgoa Road and a traffic report has demonstrated that the site, and surrounding road network, can accommodate the proposed development.  Appropriate acoustic fencing will ensure that noise impacts for adjoining residential properties are mitigated.  This fencing will also resolve the outstanding unauthorised access arrangements off Glenbrook Street via Red Rooster.

In view of the assessment, Council can be satisfied that the site is suitable for the proposed development.

 

6.   Section 79C(1)(d) – Any Submissions made in relation to the Development

Referrals

The application was referred to the following stakeholders and their comments have formed part of the assessment:

 

Referral Body

Comments Received

Building Surveyor

No objection, subject to conditions of consent.

Development Engineer

No objection, subject to conditions of consent.

Environmental Health

No objection, subject to conditions of consent.

Public Health

No objection, subject to conditions of consent.

Traffic

No objection, subject to conditions of consent.

Community Consultation

In accordance with Council’s Notification and Advertising Policy, the proposed development was notified from 9 January 2013 to 31 January 2013 with 6 submissions received raising the following concerns which are accompanied with commentary:

i.  Vehicular access to Glenbrook Street

Comment: - Concern was raised that this development would result in the only access point to the site being available from Mulgoa Road.  The existing access to the site via the adjoining Red Rooster development in unauthorised.  It has reduced the number of car parking spaces available on site and presents an increased opportunity for vehicle conflict or vehicle and pedestrian conflict.  This development proposes the closure of this unauthorised access.  The traffic assessment submitted with the application has demonstrated that the site can operate effectively utilising the existing access off Mulgoa Road.

ii. Insufficient on site car parking

Comment: - Adequate car parking for this development and the other existing uses can be accommodated on site.  Refer to the previous discussion in this regard under the heading of The Likely Impacts of the Development.

iii. Adverse Noise Impacts 

Comment: - The application has been accompanied by an Acoustic Report which included recommendations for the operation of the centre and the provision of acoustic fencing.  Recommended conditions of consent will ensure that noise generation from the development is contained within appropriate guidelines.  Refer to the discussion in this regard under the heading of The Likely Impacts of the Development.

iv. Vandalism

Comment:-Concerns were raised regarding the appropriate maintenance of the site. A condition of consent is recommended regarding the ongoing maintenance of the site and requiring the removal/repair of any graffiti or vandalism.

v. Air conditioning screening

Comment:-Residents within Kay Street raised concerns regarding the removal of the existing screen to the roof top air-conditioning units and the need for replacement screening to the provided.  A recommended condition of consent requires details of measures to screen the existing roof top air-conditioning units from the adjoining properties within Kay Street to be submitted to Council prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.  In addition, a recommended condition will ensure that the operating noise level of plant and equipment complies with the provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.

vi.    Construction noise

Comment: - The following recommended condition of consent is provided:

Construction works or subdivision works that are carried out in accordance with an approved consent that involve the use of heavy vehicles, heavy machinery and other  equipment likely to cause offence to adjoining properties shall be restricted to the following hours in accordance with the NSW Environment Protection Authority Noise

Control Guidelines:

·      Mondays to Fridays, 7am to 6pm

·      Saturdays, 7am to 1pm,if inaudible on neighbouring residential premises, otherwise 8am to 1pm

·      No work is permitted on Sundays and Public Holidays.

Other construction works carried out inside a building/tenancy and do not involve the use of equipment that emits noise are not restricted to the construction hours stated above.

The provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act, 1997 in regulating offensive noise also apply to all construction works.

vii.          Retention of existing landscaping

Comment: - Concerns were raised that the proposed development would result in the removal of existing landscaping located on the site, particularly within Glenbrook Street.  The existing landscaping located within the Glenbrook Street frontage of the property is to be retained.  A recommended condition of consent requires the provisions of additional screen landscaping forward of the proposed acoustic fence.

viii.      Fencing

Comment: - Concerns were raised regarding the appropriateness of a 1.8m colourbond fence within the Glenbrook Street frontage of the property as originally proposed.  The development now proposes a 2 metre high acoustic fence constructed of acoustic fencing materials.  This fencing serves to screen the development in addition to limiting pedestrian access from Glenbrook Street and satisfying an acoustic role.  A recommended condition of consent requires final details of this fencing to be submitted to Council for approval prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.  An additional recommended conditions require this fence to be setback at least 2 metres from the Glenbrook Street frontage and be provided with complementary landscaping.

ix. Site Suitability

Comment: - Concerns were raised that the proposed childcare centre was within 85m of a service station.  DCP 2010 requires child care centres to be located at least 85 metres from a service station.  An assessment with regard to SEPP 33 has been undertaken.  The location of the childcare centre satisfies the location criteria under NSW Planning Hazardous and Offensive Development Application Guidelines - Applying SEPP 33 which requires a 55emtre exclusion zoneThis is considered to satisfy the intent of this DCP requirement.  Refer to previous discussion under the heading of SEPP 33.

x. Waste Management Plan

Comment: - Concerns were raised that the waste management plan submitted with the Development Application did not reflect the level of waste generation from the alterations to the existing building.  An appropriate condition of consent has been included requiring the submission of an amended waste management plan with the Construction Certificate.

7.   Section 79C(1)(e) – The Public Interest

A child care centre is permissible with consent in the IN2 Light Industrial zone and the proposal meets the objectives of the zone.  The proposed child care centre will provide a social and economic benefit to the community through the provision of child care along a main travel route and the provision of additional employment opportunities.  The concerns raised by way of submissions have been addressed as part of the assessment of this application.  Subject to the recommended conditions, the proposal is unlikely to have a negative impact on the surrounding environment and is considered to be in the public interest.

Section 94 Contributions

No Section 94 contributions are applicable to the proposed development.

Conclusion

The proposed development has been assessed against the relevant heads of consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, including the provisions of LEP 2010 and those of DCP 2010.  The development has been assessed with respect to Council’s development controls for location, noise, built form, traffic, access and parking.  As noted under the heading of Site Suitability, there are some notable shortcomings concerning the development site and the development itself.  However, on balance, the application is considered worthy of support give that it does satisfy other relevant planning controls.

 

The child care centre will provide a social and economic benefit to the community through the provision of child care along a main travel route and the provision of additional employment opportunities. 

 

The development has been designed with regard to the relevant Children’s Services Regulations and the necessary licensing from NSW Community Services will ensure compliance in this regard

 

In light of this, the application is recommended for approval subject to the imposition of conditions of development consent.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Development Application DA13/0009 Proposed Child Care Centre at Lot 1 DP 1047731 (No. 9-11) Glenbrook Street, Jamisontown be received.

2.     Development Application No. 12/0892 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling , and the construction of a new dwelling to create a dual occupancy, be approved subject to the following conditions:

 

Standard Conditions

3.1    A001 - Approved plans that are architecturally drawn

A012 – Food Premises

A019 – Occupation Certificate

A021 – Business Registration

A026 – Advertising Sign

A038 – Lighting Locations

A039 – Graffiti

A046 – Construction Certificate

B002 – Demolition Disposal

B003 – Asbestos

B005 – Mud/soil

B006 – Hours of Work

D001 – Sediment & Erosion Control

D005 – No fill

D06A - Earthworks

D009 – Covering Waste Storage Area

D010 – Disposal of Waste

D014 –

E01A – BCA Compliance

E006 – Disabled Access & Facilities

E008 – Fire Safety List

E009 – Annual Fire Safety Statement

F001 – Food Premises Construction & Plans

G002 – Section 73 Certificate

G004 – Integral Energy

H001 – Stamped Plans & Site Notice

H002 – Construction

H005 – Revised Waste Management Plan

H019 – Old Materials

H024 – Glass Installations

H032 – Painting

H041 –

L001 – General Landscaping

L002 – Landscape Construction

L003 – Category 2 Landscape Report

L005 – Planting of Plant Material

L006 – Australian Standard Landscape Standard

L008 – Tree Preservation Order

Q001 – Notice of Commencement & Appointment of PCA

Q006 – Occupation Certificate

 

Special Conditions

 

                             Existing Signage

                             3.2     The existing signage located along the western elevation of the                                           building is to be removed as a part of the alterations to the building.

                             Dust

                             3.3     Dust suppression techniques are to be employed during demolition                                     and construction to reduce any potential nuisances to surrounding                                     properties.

 

                             Food Premises

                             3.4     Prior to the operation of the food business the business must notify                                    the NSW Food Authority of their details including:

                                a)       Contact details for the food business, including the name and                                      address of the business and the proprietor of the business.

                                b)      The nature of the food business.

                                c)       The location of any other food premises associated with the                                         food business, within the jurisdiction of NSW Food Authority.

Should these details change during the operation of the business the business operator must provide the NSW Food Authority with an update of these details.

Notification can be completed free of charge on the NSW Food Authority’s Food Notify website at www.foodnotify.nsw.gov.au.

                             3.5     A Food Safety Supervisor, with a current Food Safety                                                        Supervisor Certificate recognised    by the NSW Food                                                        Authority, must be appointed by the business prior to                                                   commencement of the business.

                             3.6     The proprietor of the food business shall ensure that the                                                      requirements of the NSW Food Act 2003, NSW Food                                                        Regulation 2010 and the Australian and New Zealand Food                                             Standards Code are met at all times.

                             3.7     A satisfactory inspection from Council’s Environmental Health                                          Department will be required prior to the issuing of the                                                        Occupation Certificate and operation of the business. The                                                   occupier is to contact the department to organise an                                                               appointment.

                             Noise

                             3.8     The use of the Childcare Centre is permitted to operate Monday to                          Friday 7:00am and 7:00pm. The centre is not to operate on weekends                        or public holidays.  Staff are not to generate noise that can be heard                        from an adjacent premises before 7:00am.  Deliveries, waste removal                         and cleaning is to occur between 7:00am and 7:00pm Monday to                              Friday, excluding public holidays.

                             3.9     A maximum of one hundred and eight (108) children are permitted in                      the centre at any one time.

 

                             3.10   The use of the outdoor play areas associated with the Childcare                                          Centre are permitted to be used for a maximum period of 2 hours per                                day between the hours of 7am and 6pm.

 

§              A maximum of:

 

·      Thirty eight (38) children aged between 0-2 years are allowed to play outside in the play area adjoining residences facing Kay Close.

·      Seventy (70) children aged between 2-5 years are allowed to play outside in the play area adjacent to Glenbrook Street.

 

The use of a PA system or amplified music is not permitted to be used in the outdoor play areas. The use of amplified music within the building shall not be audible from residential boundaries.

 

Prior to the issue of Construction Certificate, a Management Plan is to be submitted for Council’s consideration outlining the hours of use of the outdoor play areas.

 

                             3.11   The windows and doors of the indoor play rooms are to be kept                                              closed when children are playing indoors. 

 

                             3.12   Noise levels from the premises shall not exceed the relevant noise                             criteria detailed in the Acoustic Report prepared by Rodney Stevens                          Acoustics (ref 13012 dated Feb 2013.  The recommendations                                provided in the above-mentioned documents are to be implemented                           and incorporated into the design and construction of the development,                              and shall be shown on plans accompanying the Construction                                Certificate application

 

                             A report is to be obtained from a qualified acoustic consultant                                  certifying that the development meets the relevant noise criteria and                        conditions of this consent. This report is to be submitted to the                                 Principal Certifying Authority and Council prior to the issue of an                             Occupation Certificate.

 

                             The provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act                        1997 apply to the development, in terms of regulating offensive noise.

 

                            3.13   A noise barrier is to be provided along boundaries as recommended in                     the acoustic report entitled Acoustic Report prepared by Rodney                         Stevens Acoustics (ref 13012 dated Feb 2013).

 

                                      Detailed plans and specifications of the sound barrier walls are to be                       submitted to Council prior to the issue of a Construction                                       Certificate.  The walls are to be satisfactorily completed prior to the                      issue of an Occupation Certificate.

                             3.14   The finishes and colours of the acoustic fence are to complement                              those of the building and adjoining development.  Details are to be                          included with the plans and specifications submitted prior to the                           issue of a Construction Certificate.

                             3.15   The setback of the acoustic fence from the property boundaries to be                        increased so as to provide for additional screen landscaping forward                        of the acoustic fence.  A minimum 500mm setback, with 1.5metre                        insets, is to be provided along the Glenbrook Street frontage of the                        site.  A minimum 500mm setback is to be provided along the western                          boundary (adjoining the Red Rooster site). 

                                      A revised landscape plan is to be submitted to Council is this regard                         detailing the location, type and number of proposed plantings between                              the acoustic fence and the property boundaries, and including details                        of landscape maintenance.  The revised acoustic fence details,                                      together with the revised landscape plan, is to be submitted to Council                       for approval prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

 

                             3.16   A Noise Management Plan (NMP) is to be prepared and submitted to                      Penrith City Council for consideration and approval prior to the                       issue of an Occupation Certificate.   The NMP may need to be                      amended to include the any comments provided by Council. The                           NMP is to:

·        address all noise related aspects of the development's operational phases, including:

 

−       how the restriction on the number of children playing outside  will be managed

−       a schedule describing the times of outdoor play for each group of children; and

·        address the relevant conditions of this consent; and

·        recommend any systems/controls to be implemented to minimise the potential for any adverse noise impact(s); and

·        incorporate a program for ongoing monitoring and review to ensure that the NMP remains contemporary with relevant environmental standards.

·        The approved Noise Management Plan is to be implemented and complied with at all times.

 

                             3.17   A public contact number is to be displayed on the childcare centre                           signage and this phone line must be operational during business                                   hours.  A complaint register is to be maintained and must include                     complaint details and any actions taken to address those complaints.                             A copy of the complaint register is to be provided to Council upon                           request.

 

                             3.18   In the event of ongoing noise complaints relating to the development                       being received by Council, the owner and/or occupier of the                                     development maybe required by Council to obtain the services of a                          suitably qualified acoustic consultant to undertake a noise impact                            assessment on the development to address the concerns of the                                  community.

 

                            The noise impact assessment report is to be prepared and provided to                       Council within 45 days of being requested. The assessment report is                            to be approved by Council, with any recommendations being                                implemented in accordance with the approved assessment report.

 

                             3.19   Appropriate signage is to be provided to the carpark and entrance                            of the centre requesting patrons to minimise noise and protect the                              amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood.

 

·              Prior to the issuing of the Occupation Certificate a suitable signage plan is to be submitted to Council for approval.

·              The signage plan is to provide details on the location, sizing and wording of the proposed signs.

·              The signs are to be constructed prior to the issuing of the occupation           certificate.

                             3.20   Prior to the issuing of a Construction Certificate, details of                                   measures to screen the existing roof top air-conditioning units located                      within the building from the adjoining properties within Kay Street                             are to be submitted to Penrith City Council for approval.

                             Signage

                             3.21   Appropriate signage is to be provided to the carpark and entrance of                        the centre requesting patrons to minimise noise and protect the                                           amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood.

·     Prior to the issuing of the Occupation Certificate a suitable signage plan is to be submitted to Council for approval.

·     The signage plan is to provide details on the location, sizing and   wording of the proposed signs.

·     The signs are to be constructed prior to the issuing of the occupation certificate.

                             Traffic

                             3.22   A total of 36 car parking spaces on site are to be dedicated to the child                              care centre.  These spaces are to be appropriately marked prior to the                      issue of the Occupation Certificate.

                             3.23   All car parking and manoeuvring must be in accordance with                                    AS2890.1:2004 and AS2890.6:2009 and Council’s requirements.

                             3.24   No vehicular or pedestrian access is permitted via Glenbrook Street or                     any adjoining site.

                             3.25   The gates to the car parking area at the rear of Toys R Us are to                                          remain open during business hours.

          * Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the extension of the “No Stopping” zone across the Glenbrook Street frontage of the site is to be implemented.  The approval of Council’s Local Traffic Committee is required prior to the installation of signage.  All signage costs are to be borne by the applicant.

          * Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, a sign is to be erected within the car park, near the location of the new circulation aisle, indicating the location of the car parking area for the child care centre.

                             Fit out General

                             3.26   The construction, fit out and finishes of the food premises must                               comply with Standard 3.2.3 of the Australian and New Zealand Food                        Standards Code, and AS4674-2004 Design, Construction and Fit out                        of Food Premises.

                             3.27   Details of the kitchen, and any food preparation and storage areas                            must be prepared by a suitably qualified person and certified in                                    accordance with Standard 3.2.3 of the Australian and New Zealand                             Food Standards Code and AS 4674-2004 Design, Construction and                          Fitout of Food Premises to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority                      prior to a Construction Certificate being issued.

                             Hand basins

                             3.28   Hand basins must be freestanding, serviced with hot and cold water                        through a single outlet, able to be mixed at a temperature of at least                             40°C and fitted with a hands free operation. Where sensor taps are                           installed the basin must not be more than 6 metres from the hot water                           system. Disposable paper hand towels and soap must be provided and           serviced from a dispenser adjacent to each hand basin.

                             Staff toilets

3.29   Staff toilets must be provided on the premises. Where a toilet adjoins a food preparation area it must be separated by an air lock and its doors must be fitted with self closing devices.  Toilets intended for customer use must not be accessed through areas where open food is handled, displayed or stored.

3.30   A hand basin must be located within the toilet cubicle. Hand basins must be freestanding, serviced with hot and cold water through a single outlet, able to be mixed at a temperature of at least 40°C and fitted with a hands free operation. Where sensor taps are used the basin must not be more than 6 metres from the hot water system. Disposable paper hand towels and soap must be provided and serviced from a dispenser adjacent to each hand basin.

                             Hot water service

3.31   Hot water services must be positioned at least 75mm clear of the adjacent wall surfaces, and mounted at a minimum 150mm above the floor level on a non-corrosive metal stand. The hot water system must be sized to meet the demands of the food business during peak operating and cleaning periods and be able to provide sufficient hot water throughout the working day. Discharge from the hot water system must enter the sewer through a tongue dish in accordance with Sydney Water’s requirements.

                             Mechanical ventilation

3.32   Cooking appliances which exceed a total maximum power input of 8kw for electrical, or a total gas input of 29MJ/h for a gas appliance are required to have a kitchen exhaust system installed in accordance with Clause F4.12 of the Building Code of Australia and Australian Standard AS1668 Parts 1 &    2.

          Detailed plans together with calculations for the system must be provided as part of the development application or as part of the Construction Certificate application.

          The exhaust hood must completely cover the equipment to be ventilation and extended at least 200mm beyond the perimeter of the equipment. The exhaust hood must be provided with a condensation gutter around its base.  The gutter must be at least 50mm wide by 25mm deep.   Where abutting walls are located the hood must be constructed so as to finish flat against the wall surface.

          The low edge of a canopy type exhaust hood must be at least 2000 mm above floor level.    

3.33   Prior to the issuing of an Occupational Certificate, and operation of the business, the exhaust system shall be certified by an appropriately qualified person to comply with the Building Code of Australia and Australian Standard AS1668 Parts 1 & 2. A copy of the certification and supporting documentation must be provided to Council’s Environmental Health Department if Council is not the Principal Certifying Authority.

Floor and floor wastes

3.34   The floor of the food premises must be finished in an approved non      absorbent material, evenly laid, or graded and drained to a trapped floor waste. All floor wastes in the food preparation, service and scullery area must be fitted with a sump removable basket and grate, a minimum 200mm in diameter, and finished in all stainless steel.

                             Coving

3.35   Approved, recessed coving must be provided at all intersections of the floor with the walls within all food preparation, service, storage and scullery areas.   All coving must have a minimum concave radius of 25mm and be installed so as to be integral to the surface finish of both floor and wall in such a manner as to form a continuous, uninterrupted surface.

                             Walls

3.36   The walls of the food preparation area must be of solid construction and finished with glazed ceramic tiles or other approved material to a height of 2 metres. The intersection of tiles and render must have a flush finish, or be splayed at a 45 degree angle to eliminate a ledge that would allow dust and grease to accumulate.

3.37   The walls at the rear of cooking appliances must be surfaced with an     impervious material, such as stainless steel, which extends from the canopy to the floor. Where a cooking appliance is sealed to the wall, the material must be lapped over the top edge of the appliance to provide a grease and vermin proof seal. Cooking appliances must only be sealed to walls made of a non-combustible material.

                             Ceilings

3.38   The ceiling in the preparation, service and scullery areas must be   constructed with a rigid, non-absorbent, smooth faced material free from open joints, cracks and crevices and be painted with a light coloured washable paint.   The intersection of the walls and ceiling must be tight jointed, sealed and dust proofed.   Drop-in panel style ceilings are not permitted.

                             Service pipes

3.39   Service pipes, electrical conduits, refrigeration condensate pipes shall be enclosed or chased into walls, floors or plinths. Where it can be    demonstrated that this is not feasible pipes and conduits fixed on brackets, providing a minimum of 25 mm clearance from the adjacent wall and 100 mm from the floor or adjacent horizontal surface, can be used.  All openings in walls, floors and ceilings, through which service pipes and conduits pass, must be vermin proof.

                             Temperature control

3.40   Appliances used to store potentially hazardous food must have a capacity to keep foods hotter than 60oC, refrigerated foods less than 5oC, and frozen foods less than 18o C and be provided with a digital thermometer, accurate to 1oC that can be easily observed from outside the appliance.

Window sills

3.41   Any window sill within a food preparation area, service or scullery area must be located 450mm above the top of any bench/sink and tiled at a splayed angle of 45 degrees.

                             Flyscreens

3.42   Flyscreens or other approved means of excluding flies must be     provided to all window and door openings.

                             Meter box

3.43   The meter box must be provided with an approved non-absorbent, smooth faced cover. The cover is to be splayed at an angle of 45 degrees to the wall at the top and made tight fitting to the wall surfaces

Dishwasher

3.44   Details of the dishwashing/glass washing machines must be submitted to Council and approved prior to installation.   All utensils and equipment must undergo a washing, sanitising and rinsing cycle.   The sanitising rinse cycle must achieve a water temperature of 80°C for 2 minutes or 75°C for 10 minutes.

Wash and food preparation sinks

3.45   All wash sinks and food preparation sinks must be serviced with hot and cold water through a single outlet. Wash sinks must be supplied with water at a temperature of not less than 54 °C for washing.

3.46   The double bowl sink must be constructed of stainless steel, have a       minimum bowl size of 450mm x 300mm x 300mm to enable cleaning of large pots and equipment, be fitted with a draining area at each end, and have a splashback as part of the unit at least 300mm up the wall.

3.47   The food preparation sink must be separated from all other sinks by a    minimum distance of 2 metres or have an approved form of physical barrier that separates the sink.

Cleaners sink

3.48   The cleaners sink must be serviced with hot and cold water through taps fitted with hose connectors.   Cleaner’s sinks must be located outside of areas       where open food is handled.   

Fixture and fittings

3.49   All fixtures, fittings and equipment must be provided with smooth and impervious surfaces, free from cracks and crevices to enable easy cleaning.

3.50   All fittings and fixtures must be built into the wall and floor so as to be free from joint, gaps and cavities to enable easy cleaning or alternatively, supported on one of the following:

a.       Plinths – plinths must be an integral part of the floor, constructed of      solid materials similar to the floor at least 75mm in height and coved    at the intersection with the floor.   All plinths must have a smooth and   impervious finish.   All fittings and fixtures must be properly sealed         to the plinth so to be free from gaps, cracks and cavities.

b.       Wheels or castors – fittings and fixtures can be supported on wheels or castors.   The wheels and castors must be capable of supporting and easily moving a full loaded fitting.   All wheels and castors must be   provided with a restraining device.

c.       Legs – fittings and fixtures can be supported on legs but must be constructed of a non-corrosive, smooth metal or moulded plastic. All legs must be free from cracks and crevices. All legs must have a clearance space between the floor and the underside of the fitting of at least 200 mm.

NOTE: False bottoms under fittings are not permitted (AS4674-2004 – Section 4.2 and 4.3).

3.51   All food preparation benches must be constructed in stainless steel or finished in a smooth and non-absorbent approved material that is free of joints.

3.52   All storage cabinets (internal and external surfaces) must be finished in a smooth and non-absorbent approved material that is free of joints.

3.53   Light bulbs or tubes are to be shatterproof or fitted with approved light diffusers (covers or shields) to prevent contamination of food by glass from a broken light globe or tube. Light fittings must be free from any feature that would collect dirt or dust, harbour insects or make the fitting difficult to clean. Light fittings must be recessed into ceilings or equipment where possible. Heat lamps must be protected against breakage by a shield extending beyond the bulb.

3.54   Shelves must be smooth and impervious; free from joints, cracks and     crevices; and able to be easily cleaned. The lowest shelf must be at least 200mm off the floor to allow easy cleaning underneath. Approved materials must be used, such as galvanised piping, stainless steel or laminated plastic. Shelves are to be sealed to the wall or kept clear of walls to allow easy access for cleaning (>40 mm).

Lockers

3.55   Sufficient lockers must be provided in the food preparation area or store room specifically for the storage of cleaning materials, employees’ clothing and personal belongings.

Storeroom

3.56   The storeroom must be constructed in accordance with AS4674-2004 by providing the following:

-        A smooth, even, non-slip floor surface.

-        Coving at all intersections of the floor and walls with approved, recessed coving to a minimum concave radius of 25mm, so as to be integral to the surface finish of both floor and wall in such a manner as to form a continuous, uninterrupted surface. “Feather edge skirting” and non-rebated coving are not permitted.

-        Walls must be provided with a smooth even surface and painted with a light coloured washable paint to enable easy cleaning.

-        The ceiling must be constructed with a rigid, non-absorbent, smooth faced material free from open joints, cracks and crevices and be painted with a light coloured washable paint.   The intersections of the walls and ceiling must be tight-jointed, sealed and dustproof.  Drop in panel style ceilings are          not permitted.

-        Shelving or storage racks must be designed and constructed to enable easy cleaning.

Waste storage areas and rubbish bins

3.57   All garbage must be stored in accordance with the requirements of the Food Safety Standards of the Australian and New Zealand Food Standards Code and the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 to prevent the harbourage of vermin or generation of odours.

3.58   Smooth and impervious surfaces (walls and floors) must be provided to all waste storage areas and rooms.  Floor areas must be graded and drained to a floor waste gully connected to the sewer.  Open waste storage areas must be appropriately covered and bunded to avoid stormwater entering the sewer. Waste storage rooms must be adequately ventilated and proofed against pests.  The area or room must be provided with water service hose connectors to enable easy cleaning.

                   Rubbish bins must be cleaned regularly to remove the food scraps stuck on the bin surface and to minimise the emission of odour that attracts insects and vermin. Bins may be cleaned either by the rubbish collecting contractors or inside a rubbish room constructed to the above specifications.

                   Bins, hoppers and other containers used for storing garbage or recyclable material shall be:

-        constructed of impervious material such as metal or plastic; and

-        have tight fitting lids

-        bins that cannot be lifted for draining after cleaning shall have drainage bungs at the base

Access Report

3.59   Prior to the issuing of a Construction Certificate, an Accessibility Report shall be submitted to and approved by Penrith City Council. The report shall detail the development's compliance with the Building Code of Australia, Disability (Access to Premises - Buildings) Standards 2010, AS 1428 and AS 4299.

          The architectural plans, including car parking layout shall be amended to reflect any works required as a result of compliance with the above      standards and any recommendations of the Accessibility Report.

Outdoor Shading

3.60   The outdoor shading area is to be provided as required by DCP 2010 and a written statement is to be provided to the Principal Certifying authority of compliance prior to the issue of Occupation Certificate.

4.         Those who have made submissions will be advised of the determination.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

Locality Map

1 Page

Appendix

2. View

Site plan, floor plan and elevations

6 Pages

Appendix

3. View

Acoustic Fence

1 Page

Appendix

4. View

DCP 2010 Compliance Table

4 Pages

Appendix

  


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                          25 November 2013

Appendix 1 - Locality Map

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                          25 November 2013

Appendix 2 - Site plan, floor plan and elevations

 






 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                          25 November 2013

Appendix  3 - Acoustic Fence

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                          25 November 2013

Appendix 4 - DCP 2010 Compliance Table

 





Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

5

Development Application DA13/1033 Proposed First Floor Addition to Existing Residence at Lot 142 DP 238553 (No. 4) Wiles Place, Cambridge Park  Applicant:  Cape Cod Australia Pty Ltd;  Owner:  S Mahon & K Platt    

 

Compiled by:               Stephen Krimmer, Environmental Health and Building Surveyor

Authorised by:            Paul Lemm, Development Services Manager   

 

Outcome

We plan for our future growth

Strategy

Facilitate development that encourages a range of housing types

Service Activity

Delivery timely assessment, regulation and certification of development and building work in accordance with statutory requirements

      

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

Executive Summary

Council is in receipt of a development application for the construction of a first floor addition to an existing single storey dwelling at 4 Wiles Place, Cambridge Park. In accordance with reporting procedures provided by the Department of Planning and Infrastructure, the matter is forwarded to Council for determination as the variation to the rear setback exceeds 25%. The report recommends the SEPP1 objection be supported and the development application be approved.

The site is zoned 2 (b) Residential (Low Density) under the Penrith Local Environmental Plan (LEP) 1998 Urban Land. Under the objectives of the LEP, development is required to reinforce the importance of natural landscape settings, protect landscapes and urban areas with traditional residential character and to allow a limited range of compatible non-residential uses.

 

The first floor addition achieves these objectives by providing a site responsive development that compliments the surrounding area and minimises impacts on adjoining properties.

 

The application is supported by the submission of an objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No.1 and seeks a variation to the rear setback requirement.

 

The SEPP 1 objection has demonstrated that full compliance with the rear setback requirement is unreasonable due to the existing dwelling encroachment and irregular shape of the lot. The variation to the planning control associated with the proposed addition is unlikely to have any significant impacts on the amenity of the locality.

  

Site and Surrounds 

The subject site is situated at the end of a cul-de-sac in Wiles Place and is currently occupied by a single storey dwelling. The site is 638m² in area and is an irregular shape (a Locality Map is attached in Appendix No 1.).

There is currently a single storey dwelling located on the site with a 1.0m rear setback and covered patio to the rear boundary. The surrounding area is characterised by established residential development.

 

The Proposed Development

The proposed development includes the construction of a first floor addition consisting of 3 bedrooms, rumpus room and bathroom. 

The development application was accompanied by:

·  An objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 to Clause 12 of Council’s Local Environmental Plan 1998 Urban Lands.

· Statement of Environmental Effects

· Site and building plans

· BASIX certificate

 

Site Plan and Elevation Plan are attached in Appendix No. 2 and 3. 

 

Planning Assessment

The development has been assessed in accordance with the matters for consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Having regard to those matters, the following issues have been identified for further consideration.

Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 20.

The provisions of SREP 20 apply to the property as it falls within the Hawkesbury-Nepean River Catchment. SREP 20 aims to protect the environment of the Hawkesbury-Nepean River, by ensuring that the impacts of future land uses are considered in a regional context. Of most relevance to the proposal is the potential impact on residential development and water quality.

 

The proposed development will have minimal impacts on the total catchment management, water quality and water quantity. No heritage items are located on the site. No tree removal is required as part of this development. The dwelling addition is considered to have minimal adverse impact on visibility from the riverine corridor and its scenic quality. The proposed dwelling addition is consistent with surrounding development.

 

The proposal is in keeping with the objectives of the SREP.

Section 79C(1)(a)(i) – Any Environmental Planning Instrument

Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Land)

Under the terms of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Land) the land is Zone No 2(b) Residential (Low Density). The proposed development is defined as a dwelling addition, which is permissible with the consent of Council.

 

The proposed development is site responsive and compatible with surrounding residential development. The design is compatible with the existing housing in the locality.

 

The dwelling addition application proposes the following variations:

 

Relevant Clause 12(4) requirements

Requirements for Zone No. 2(b)

Proposal

Extent of Variation

Rear Setback

6 metres

3.67-5.7m (point encroachment)

5%-39% (point encroachment)

  

A State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 (SEPP1) objection has been lodged in support of the development application to vary the rear setback requirement.

 

SEPP 1 seeks to provide flexibility in the application of planning controls where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objectives stated in Section 5 (a)(i) and (ii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. These objectives relate to the proper management of resources to promote the welfare of the community and environment and to promote the orderly and economic use of development of the land.

 

The SEPP 1 objection is required to demonstrate that compliance with the aims and objectives of the relevant planning instrument and zone can still be achieved regardless of the variation to the development standard.

 

 The objectives for Zone 2(b) Residential (Low Density) are as follows: 

 

(i) to reinforce the importance of natural landscape settings and areas with heritage conservation value.

 

Comment - The proposed development is sited so as to minimise the amount of vegetation required to be removed. The site is not identified as being in a Heritage Conservation Area.

 

(ii) to promote the established urban and landscape character of traditional residential subdivisions by limiting the range of permissible uses.

 

Comment - The proposed development is designed in a manner which is responsive to the site. The proposed development is compatible with surrounding land uses.

 

(iii) to allow a limited range of compatible non-residential uses.

 

Comment - The proposed development does not include further non-residential uses.

 

The objectives of Section 12 of LEP 1998 Urban Land are as follows:

 

(a)     Achieve site-responsive development at a scale which is compatible with existing housing in the locality by controlling visual impacts relating height and bulk.

(b)     Minimise the impact of loss of privacy, overshadowing and loss of views.

(c)     Achieve an appropriate separation between buildings and site boundaries and preserve private open space corridors along rear lines.

(d)     Protect and enhance the environmental features, which are characteristic of each of the residential zones, by requiring sufficient space on-site for effective landscaping and on-site stormwater detention.

 

In regard to these objectives, the proposed development has been designed to make the most of the site constraints. Due to the irregular shape of the lot, it is considered the setback achieved is appropriate and will not have adverse impact on the subject site or surrounding sites. Loss of privacy is minimised through the use of full obscure glazing along the entire rear elevation of the first floor addition.

 

Assessment of Rear Setback variation

The rear setback of the existing dwelling is 1.0m. Due to the irregular shape and angle of the rear setback, a portion of the first floor addition proposes a rear setback of 3.67-5.7m.

Clause 12(4) of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1998 (Urban Land) states:

 

(4)     the council must not grant consent to development that involves the erection of a building unless:

(a)     that building is set back at least 6 metres from the rear boundary of the site or, in the case of a single storey building in Zone No 2 (a), 2 (b), 2 (c), 2 (d) or 2 (e), at least 4 metres from the rear boundary of the site, and

(b)     the land within the rear boundary setback is used for the purposes of landscaped area only.

 

The subject site is zoned 2(b) and therefore a minimum rear setback of 6.0m is applicable to the subject site.

 

A SEPP 1 objection has been submitted requesting a variation to this control and is considered acceptable on the following grounds:

 

·    Due to the irregular shape of the allotment and existing orientation of the dwelling, the rear boundary angles in towards the existing dwelling. As the proposed first floor addition is located over the existing dwelling, the rear boundary setback measurement decreases towards the middle of the property. 

 

·   The rear setback of the existing dwelling is 1m. It is therefore noted that the existing development does not comply with rear setback provisions.

 

·    The overall extent of non compliance is minor as it only applies to a portion of the first floor addition;

 

·    The extent of non compliance is limited to a section of the rear north western corner of the first floor addition. This will have no adverse overshadowing or overlooking impacts due to the orientation of the lot and privacy measures to the windows.

 

·    The extent of non compliance is also considered minor given the relatively shallow lot depth and the irregular shape of the allotment;

 

·    The proposed additions remains consistent with the zone objectives particularly in relation to promoting the urban character of the area;

 

·    The development as proposed will have no adverse impact on the amenity of surrounding properties or detrimentally impact on the streetscape character.

 

The extent of non compliance is considered minimal in comparison to the existing rear setback non compliance.  The failure of the development to meet the rear setback requirements has not diminished the ability of the proposal to achieve the aims and objectives of Penrith LEP 1998 (Urban Land).

 

It is considered the proposed development, while contravening the numerical controls of Clause 12(4), is consistent with the established landscape characteristic of the locality and achieves the objectives for rear setback requirements.

 

The SEPP 1 objection is also made on the premise that the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary on the following basis:

 

·    The proposed development does not hinder the attainment of the objectives of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.

·    The dwelling addition is reasonable development for the site considering the existing dwelling encroachments and irregular shape of the lot. 

 

 2. Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) – Any Development Control Plan

 

Penrith DCP 2006 Part 4 Section 4.2 – “Residential Single Dwellings” is applicable to the current development application and the following sections are relevant to the assessment process. 

 

Section 5.3 Front, Side and Rear Setbacks

The objective is to ensure setbacks reflect the character of established garden suburbs, and provide for development of flora and fauna corridors. The proposed development does not comply with the 6.0m rear setback requirements and proposes a rear setback of 3.67-5.7m. This is addressed in the SEPP1 discussion above. The proposed front and side setbacks do not extend closer than the setbacks of the existing dwelling.  

 

Section 5.4 Landscaped Area and Parking

The objective is to retain a reasonable proportion of each site for landscaped garden areas, conserve significant existing vegetation and provide reasonable separation between neighbouring dwellings. The proposed first floor addition is located over the existing dwelling and does not impact on the landscaped area.

 

Section 5.5 Solar Planning

The objective is to improve the energy efficiency of dwellings and achieve a high standard of residential amenity. The applicant has demonstrated the dwelling addition meets acceptable solar standards and that existing neighbouring and proposed private open spaces receive a minimum of 3 hours sunlight between 9am and 3pm on 21st June.

 

 

Section 6.3 Building Design

The objective is that dwellings be surrounded by private gardens, their facades should display a variety of materials and shading structures and garages should be integrated with the overall architectural form and design. The first floor addition is stepped in from the front and rear of the existing dwelling. This provides a well articulated design with matching roof pitch to the existing dwelling. Materials and colours will compliment the existing dwelling and surrounding area. 

 

3.   Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of the Development

The development complies with the objectives of the planning controls and the impacts of the development are expected to be minimal.

 

Stormwater is to be directed to the existing stormwater system.

 

Appropriate conditions are recommended relating to site management during construction. Hours of work and construction noise will also be subject to recommended consent conditions.

4.   Section 79C(1)(c) – The Suitability of the Site for the Development

The site is suitable for the construction of a dwelling addition. Whilst there are some limitations resulting from the irregular shape of the site, these issues have been addressed to ensure a suitable design has been proposed in keeping with the objectives of the relevant planning documents.

5.   Section 79C(1)(d) – Any Submissions made in relation to the Development

Community Consultation

In accordance with Chapter 2.7 of the Penrith Development Control Plan for the City of Penrith 2006 – Notification and Advertising, the proposed development was notified to nearby and adjoining residents from 23 September – 7 October 2013. One objection was received in relation to privacy impacts from the windows at the rear of the first floor addition.

In this regard, the applicant has modified the proposal to have obscure glazing to all windows on the rear elevation of the first floor addition (See Special Condition 3.2)

A letter has been sent to the objector in response to the concerns raised and notifying of the upcoming Council meeting.

 

Conclusion 

The subject development application seeks approval to construct a first floor addition and is supported by a SEPP 1 objection seeking a variation to the required rear setback. The SEPP 1 objection is supported as it is demonstrated the rear setback requirement is unreasonable in this case and that the attainment of the objectives of Section 5(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act will not be hindered by the proposal.

 

The development is considered to satisfy the requirements of Section 79(C) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act as outlined in the assessment of this report.  The proposed first floor addition is unlikely to have any significant impacts on the amenity of the locality.  The proposed first floor addition is considered to comply with the objectives of the relevant planning instruments as outlined above and a site responsive development is achieved.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Development Application DA13/1033 Proposed First Floor Addition to Existing Residence at Lot 142 DP 238553 (No. 4) Wiles Place, Cambridge Park be received.

2.     The SEPP 1objection be supported to vary the minimum rear setback requirement.

3.     The application be approved subject to the following conditions.

3.1       A001 Approved plans that are architecturally drawn

A008 Works to BCA requirements

A019 Occupation Certificate

A046 Obtain a Construction Certificate

D001 Implement approved sediment & erosion control measures

D009 Covering of waste storage area

D010 Appropriate disposal of excavated or other waste

E001 BCA compliance

ESPECIAL Smoke detector

H001 Stamped plans

H009 Cut/fill details

H017 Loads on existing buildings

H030 Roof finishes

H041 Hours of Work

J004 Pool fencing

K016 Stormwater

K041 Bond

L008 Tree Preservation Order

P002 Fees associated with Council land

Q01F Notice of Commencement of Appointment of PCA

Q05F Occupation/Compliance Certificate

Special Conditions

3.2       All windows on the rear elevation of the first floor addition shall be provided with obscure glazing to prevent viewing into adjoining properties when in the closed position. Details to be provided prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

                          

4.         Those who made submissions be advised of Council’s decision

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

Locality Map

1 Page

Appendix

2. View

Site Plan

1 Page

Appendix

3. View

Elevation Plans

2 Pages

Appendix

  


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                          25 November 2013

Appendix 1 - Locality Map

 

PDF Creator


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                          25 November 2013

Appendix 2 - Site Plan

 


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                                          25 November 2013

Appendix 3 - Elevation Plans

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

6

Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Chapter C37 - Castle Street, Castlereagh   

 

Compiled by:               Abdul Cheema, City Planning Coordinator 

Authorised by:            Paul Grimson, Strategic Planning Manager   

 

Outcome

We plan for our future growth

Strategy

Protect the City's natural areas, heritage and character

Service Activity

Maintain a contemporary framework of land use and contribution policies, strategies and statutory plans

      

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

Executive Summary

Over the past few years Council has been developing a single comprehensive Local Environmental Plan (LEP) for Penrith in two stages.  Stage 1 (Penrith LEP 2010) generally covers the rural areas, industrial areas, heritage items and the St Marys Town Centre.  Stage 1 of the LEP was made by the Minister for Planning on 22 September 2010.  Stage 2 (Planning Proposal for Penrith LEP) generally covers all residential areas and local retail/commercial centres except St Marys Release Area which incorporates Jordan Springs.

 

At the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 11 November 2013, Councillors considered recommendations relating to all submissions received during exhibition of the Stage 2 Planning Proposal. All recommendations included in the discussion paper were endorsed except for two matters where further investigation was requested. These matters were Castle Street, Castlereagh and Werrington Signals Site, Werrington. This report deals with the Castle Street, Castlereagh matters.

 

Discussion on the issues and recommendations on the Castle Street, Castlereagh is included in Attachment 1 to this report. It is recommended that Council endorse the recommendations included in Attachment 1 to this report.

Background

Council has been undertaking a major planning exercise to prepare a new City-wide LEP.  The new City-wide LEP must comply with the Government’s LEP template.

 

At its Ordinary Meeting of 10 October 2005, Council resolved to prepare a comprehensive LEP for the City, which has been brought forward in 2 stages as follows:

 

§  Stage 1 generally covers the rural areas, industrial areas, St Marys Town Centre and heritage items.  Stage 1 of the Local Environmental Plan was made by the Minister for Planning on 22 September 2010.

§  Stage 2 primarily covers the residential, local/neighbourhood centres, and release areas.  Stage 2, known as Planning Proposal for Penrith LEP also incorporates a number of specific rezoning proposals.

 

The Stage 2 Planning Proposal for the majority of sites proposes a direct translation of the existing planning controls into the Standard Instrument, especially for the established residential areas and local/neighbourhood centres which are not identified for growth in the next five years.

 

The Stage 2 Planning Proposal also includes a number of site-specific ‘rezoning’ proposals, ‘deferred’ matters from Penrith LEP 2010 and growth areas identified in the draft Urban Strategy where a change in zone is proposed.

 

Further, the Planning Proposal includes a number of recently adopted or gazetted LEPs.  These include the release area LEPs (Glenmore Park Stage 2, South Werrington Urban Village and Caddens), Penrith City Centre LEP 2008, Penrith LEP 2010 and Penrith LEP 1991 (Environmental Heritage Conservation).

 

At its Ordinary Meeting of 19 November 2012, Council endorsed the Planning Proposal for Penrith LEP to be submitted to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for a revised Gateway Determination under Section 56 of the Act. Council received a final Gateway Determination dated 23 April 2013 authorising Council to publicly exhibit the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan. Subsequently, the Planning Proposal was exhibited from Monday 13 May to Friday 5 July 2013. The Gateway Determination required the Stage 2 Planning Proposal to be exhibited for a minimum period of 28 days (4 weeks).  However, Council resolved on 19 November 2012, to extend the exhibition period to 8 weeks.

Policy Review Committee meeting of 11 November 2013

Council considered all submissions made during the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal for Penrith LEP at the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 11 November 2013. At that meeting, Council endorsed all recommendations included in the discussion paper except for two matters where further investigation and information was requested. This report deals with one of those matters which is the Castle Street, Castlereagh matter.

Chapter C37 – Castle Street, Castlereagh

The planning consultants representing the owners of 366-368 Hinxman Road, Castlereagh (the Property) addressed Council at its 11 November 2013 Policy Review Committee Meeting.  During the address and subsequent discussions a number of matters were raised.  These are summarised below. The options and recommendations, together with further discussion points, are included in Attachment 1 to this report.

 

The Property is located in an area of 2 hectare lots that is predominantly occupied by rural-residential development and small scale agricultural uses.  The Property is in close proximity to the Castlereagh rural centre.  This centre is not identified in the Rural Lands Strategy for future growth, as there are adequate opportunities for large lot residential and rural village living delivered across the City.

 

The precedent that would be set by allowing the construction of a dwelling on each of the individual lots would affect the area immediately surrounding the Property, and a significant number of other properties in Penrith’s rural areas.  These properties are either subject to the same planning control requiring 2 hectares for the construction of a dwelling house (in Londonderry, Llandilo and Kemps Creek) or smaller than the 10,000m2 (1 hectare) normally required for the efficient operation of on-site sewage management systems. 

 

The relaxation of this planning control would also impact on the character, amenity and landscape of these rural areas through a more dense settlement pattern and associated increases in traffic.  It would also increase land use conflicts with adjoining agricultural activities, intensify the demand for the delivery of services and infrastructure, and compete with the improvement and provision of services and infrastructure for established and planned areas.

 

Although the area of land required for the efficient operation of on-site sewage management systems is only one of the factors informing the planning control that requires a minimum of 2 hectares for the construction of a dwelling house, it is an important one as it seeks to maintain environmental quality.  Council’s policy has long required a minimum area of 10,000m2 to ensure that on-site sewage management systems function efficiently and to cater for poorly performing or failing systems.  The size of the individual lots is approximately 4,400m2, less than half of that normally required.

 

The recommendation to rectify the error in the publicly exhibited material will retain the current development opportunities available on the property, maintain the rural character of the area, manage impacts on water quality from on-site sewage management systems, and reinforce the limited role that the Castlereagh rural centre has in Penrith’s hierarchy of settlements.  It maintains the current planning control and therefore creates no disadvantage for the property owners.

 

Post exhibition changes to the Planning Proposal and need for re-exhibition

A fundamental consideration in any LEP (now Gateway) process is the nature and extent of any changes made to a Planning Proposal in response to, or following, public exhibition, and whether such changes are material to the operation and outcomes of the LEP.  Where potential changes are deemed to be material to the operation and outcomes of the LEP, it needs to be re-exhibited to ensure that communities are able to comment on the amended draft LEP / Planning Proposal.

The new Gateway process has changed the way in which a decision about re-exhibition is made.  In accordance with s58(2) and (3) of the EP&A Act, further community consultation is now not required unless the Minister makes that direction in a revised (Gateway) determination.  However, Council should provide an initial view on any specific changes that it feels may warrant consideration for re-exhibition.

This change is due to a minor error in the exhibited material. This error was identified early in the exhibition process, owners were notified of the errors, additional time was made available for owners to make submissions and submissions were received which acknowledge the correct intended material/provision. This change will not alter the operation and outcome of the Planning Proposal for Penrith LEP, and therefore may not warrant re-exhibition.  However this matter will be raised in our submission to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure.

 

 

Next Steps

Should Council endorse the recommendation tonight, the following steps will occur in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979:

1.      Council officers will continue to update the Planning Proposal, written instrument and associated maps based on the policy direction endorsed by Council.

2.      Council officers will forward the Planning Proposal to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure to make the plan.

3.      Council officers will liaise with the Department of Planning and Infrastructure and negotiate any changes sought by the Department in the lead up to the writing of the instrument by Parliamentary Counsel.

4.      Council officers will liaise with Parliamentary Counsel in writing the instrument and do any mapping changes required.

5.      The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure will make the plan.

Conclusion

For some years, it has been Council’s goal to replace the myriad of environmental planning instruments that apply across the City with one single LEP.  This will assist in making planning information more accessible to residents, developers, business owners, community groups and staff.  A single LEP for the City will have considerable benefits, particularly providing greater clarity and certainty over development opportunities and managing the growth of the City.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Chapter C37 - Castle Street, Castlereagh be received

2.       Council endorse the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan (provided separately to Councillors and available on Council’s website), amended in accordance with recommendation RC37 as appearing in Attachment 1 relating to Castle Street, Castlereagh.

3.     Where there is an inconsistency between the earlier recommendations related to this matter and the resolution to this report, the resolution to this report prevails for the purpose of amending the Planning Proposal.

4.     The General Manager be granted delegation to make any necessary minor changes required to the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan before submitting it to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure.

5.     Council endorse the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan to be forwarded to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure with a request that the Minister consider the changes made to the Planning Proposal in response to the public exhibition, and make a determination as to whether the Planning Proposal is to be re-exhibited in accordance with s58 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

6.       The Minister be requested to make the plan in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, should he determine that re-exhibition is not required.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

C37 – Castle Street, Castlereagh

11 Pages

Attachment

  


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

7

Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Chapter C43 - Werrington Signals Site, Corner Great Western Highway and French Street, Werrington   

 

Compiled by:               Abdul Cheema, City Planning Coordinator 

Authorised by:            Paul Grimson, Strategic Planning Manager   

 

Outcome

We plan for our future growth

Strategy

Protect the City's natural areas, heritage and character

Service Activity

Maintain a contemporary framework of land use and contribution policies, strategies and statutory plans

      

Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.

 

Executive Summary

Over the past few years Council has been developing a single comprehensive Local Environmental Plan (LEP) for Penrith in two stages.  Stage 1 (Penrith LEP 2010) generally covers the rural areas, industrial areas, heritage items and the St Marys Town Centre.  Stage 1 of the LEP was made by the Minister for Planning on 22 September 2010.  Stage 2 (Planning Proposal for Penrith LEP) generally covers all residential areas and local retail/commercial centres except St Marys Release Area which incorporates Jordan Springs.

 

At the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 11 November 2013, Councillors considered recommendations relating to all submissions received during exhibition of the Stage 2 Planning Proposal. All recommendations included in the discussion paper were endorsed except for two matters where further investigation was requested. These matters were Werrington Signals Site, Werrington and Castle Street, Castlereagh. This report deals with the Werrington Signals Site and issues relating to the B7 zoned land in the Penrith Health and Education Precinct.

 

Discussion on the issues and recommendations on the Werrington Signals Site, corner Great Western Highway and French Street, Werrington and the B7 zoned land in the Penrith Health and Education Precinct is included in Attachment 1 to this report. It is recommended that Council endorse the recommendations included in Attachment 1 to this report.

Background

Council has been undertaking a major planning exercise to prepare a new City-wide LEP.  The new City-wide LEP must comply with the Government’s LEP template.

 

At its Ordinary Meeting of 10 October 2005, Council resolved to prepare a comprehensive LEP for the City, which has been brought forward in 2 stages as follows:

 

§  Stage 1 generally covers the rural areas, industrial areas, St Marys Town Centre and heritage items.  Stage 1 of the Local Environmental Plan was made by the Minister for Planning on 22 September 2010.

§  Stage 2 primarily covers the residential, local/neighbourhood centres, and release areas.  Stage 2, known as Planning Proposal for Penrith LEP also incorporates a number of specific rezoning proposals.

 

The Stage 2 Planning Proposal for the majority of sites proposes a direct translation of the existing planning controls into the Standard Instrument, especially for the established residential areas and local/neighbourhood centres which are not identified for growth in the next five years.

 

The Stage 2 Planning Proposal also includes a number of site-specific ‘rezoning’ proposals, ‘deferred’ matters from Penrith LEP 2010 and growth areas identified in the draft Urban Strategy where a change in zone is proposed.

 

Further, the Planning Proposal includes a number of recently adopted or gazetted LEPs.  These include the release area LEPs (Glenmore Park Stage 2, South Werrington Urban Village and Caddens), Penrith City Centre LEP 2008, Penrith LEP 2010 and Penrith LEP 1991 (Environmental Heritage Conservation).

 

At its Ordinary Meeting of 19 November 2012, Council endorsed the Planning Proposal for Penrith LEP to be submitted to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for a revised Gateway Determination under Section 56 of the Act. Council received a final Gateway Determination dated 23 April 2013 authorising Council to publicly exhibit the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan. Subsequently, the Planning Proposal was exhibited from Monday 13 May to Friday 5 July 2013. The Gateway Determination required the Stage 2 Planning Proposal to be exhibited for a minimum period of 28 days (4 weeks).  However, Council resolved on 19 November 2012, to extend the exhibition period to 8 weeks.

Policy Review Committee meeting of 11 November 2013

Council considered all submissions made during the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal for Penrith LEP at the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 11 November 2013. At that meeting, Council endorsed all recommendations included in the discussion paper except for two matters where further investigation and information was requested. This report deals with one of those matters which is the B7 zoned land in Werrington (Werrington Signals Site) matter.

Chapter C43 - Werrington Signals Site – Corner GWH & French St Werrington

Three key issues were raised by the submitter and discussed by Councillors at the Policy Review Committee meeting which are individually addressed below. 

 

Zone Boundary Consistency (E2, R1 and B7 zones)

 

There were concerns that consent has been granted for a subdivision pattern which sets aside land for a riparian corridor; however this land is inconsistent with the proposed E2 zone. 

 

It should be noted that the draft zones for the PHEP were established, endorsed by Council and were also endorsed by the Director General in the Gateway Determination prior to the approval of the subdivision by the Joint Regional Planning Panel.  The earlier discussion paper therefore identified an option to amend the E2 boundary to reflect the recently approved development application.

 

Our earlier examination also identified inconsistencies with the exhibited zone boundaries (R1 - General Residential zone and B7 – Business Park) zone and the approved subdivision. It is therefore recommended the zone boundaries for the E2, R1 and B7 zones be amended to be consistent with the approved residential subdivision. 

 

Building heights (R1 and B7 zones)

 

The current building height controls are prescribed in Development Control Plan (DCP) 2007.  A mix of single, two and three storey buildings are permitted under current controls.  The translation of the existing controls resulted in the proposed maximum height of 8.5 metres which permits up to a three storey building in the R1 - General Residential zone. 

 

The Joint Regional Planning Panel approved development under DA12/1361on the northern part of the site for a six storey residential flat building which is up to 18m in height.  On this basis it is recommended that the height map be adjusted to an 18m height limit as it relates to the existing consent for residential development in the R1 - General Residential zone. 

 

The exhibited Planning Proposal sets a maximum building height of 12.5 metres however the controls in the current planning documents also permit development up to four storeys.  It is recommended that the height map be adjusted to a 15 metres height limit as it relates to the B7 – Business Park zone. The LEP also allows some flexibility in building heights for future development proposals with sufficient justification.

Chapter B4 - Penrith Health and Education Precinct (B7 Business Park zone)

Concern has been raised about the proposed B7 Business Park zoned land within the Penrith Health and Education Precinct (PHEP). The key issue related to the permissibility of warehouses and it was suggested that other business zones should be considered to address this issue. 

 

The suite of zones proposed across the Penrith Health and Education Precinct have resulted from many years of detailed analysis and consultation with the major stakeholders.  All key stakeholders including the taskforce, Penrith Business Alliance and the University of Western Sydney (UWS) have confirmed their support for the proposed zones. UWS has indicated that it is currently undertaking more detailed analysis of its future plans for both the university and the business park.

 

The PHEP has been identified in the draft Metropolitan Strategy for Sydney as a specialised centre. Council has been working with the State Government to achieve this status together with a commitment to infrastructure, for many years. Particularly given the State Government’s support for this precinct, it may not be an appropriate time to reconsider such a major component of the area as it may create an impression that there are inconsistent views between the key stakeholders and reduced confidence in the vision and strategies for the Precinct. 

 

Making zone changes of this nature post-exhibition would also represent a significant material change in the LEP which may trigger the need for re-exhibition. Should Council wish to avoid re-exhibition, an alternative would be to defer the B7 component of the PHEP for further consideration.  The disadvantage of this approach is that again, it may generate perceptions of reduced support and confidence in the PHEP.  It is therefore recommended that Council support the exhibited B7 zone at this time. 

 

Clearly it would disadvantage the City if the business park is developed to any significant extent for a warehouse and distribution centres.  Warehouse and distribution centres are mandated under the Standard Instrument as a permissible use in the B7 Business Park, B6 Enterprise Corridor and B5 Business Development zones.  This means they cannot be removed from the list of permissible uses in the zone.  Such uses provide low density employment and are not conducive to the higher order function intended for the area. 

 

There are objectives included under the B7 zone which aim to encourage a range of higher order job opportunities including health, cultural and high technology industries.  Zone objectives must be considered when a development application is assessed.  To further encourage development for higher order job opportunities within the B7 zone, it is suggested that an additional local provision be included in the draft LEP.  A local provision could permit warehouse or distribution centres only where they are ancillary to higher order health, cultural and high technology industries and occupy no more than 50% of the gross floor area of the development.

 

As the introduction of such a local provision serves to strengthen the existing policy directions of the Planning Proposal, it is considered that this approach would not trigger the need for re-exhibition of the LEP. It is also recommended that support be obtained from the Premier, Minister for Planning and Infrastructure, State MPs and Department of Planning and Infrastructure for the new local provision.

 

Council at its Policy Review Committee Meeting of 11 November 2013 considered and endorsed recommendation for Chapter B4. It is not proposed to change those recommendations, however if there are any inconsistencies between those earlier recommendations and the tonight’s decisions, the earlier recommendation is amended accordingly.

 

The options and recommendations, together with further discussion points, related to Chapter C43 and Chapter B4 are included in Attachment 1 to this report. 

 

Post exhibition changes to the Planning Proposal and need for re-exhibition

A fundamental consideration in any LEP (now Gateway) process is the nature and extent of any changes made to a Planning Proposal in response to, or following, public exhibition, and whether such changes are material to the operation and outcomes of the LEP.  Where potential changes are deemed to be material to the operation and outcomes of the LEP, it needs to be re-exhibited to ensure that communities are able to comment on the amended draft LEP / Planning Proposal.

The new Gateway process has changed the way in which a decision about re-exhibition is made.  In accordance with s58(2) and (3) of the EP&A Act, further community consultation is now not required unless the Minister makes that direction in a revised (Gateway) determination.  However, Council should provide an initial view on any specific changes that it feels may warrant consideration for re-exhibition. Any change based on the recommendations included in attachment 1 will be raised in our submission to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure.

Next Steps

Should Council endorse the recommendation tonight, the following steps will occur in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979:

1.      Council officers will continue to update the Planning Proposal, written instrument and associated maps based on the policy direction endorsed by Council.

2.      Council officers will forward the Planning Proposal to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure to make the plan.

3.      Council officers will liaise with the Department of Planning and Infrastructure and negotiate any changes sought by the Department in the lead up to the writing of the instrument by Parliamentary Counsel.

4.      Council officers will liaise with Parliamentary Counsel in writing the instrument and do any mapping changes required.

5.      The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure will make the plan.

Conclusion

For some years, it has been Council’s goal to replace the myriad of environmental planning instruments that apply across the City with one single LEP.  This will assist in making planning information more accessible to residents, developers, business owners, community groups and staff.  A single LEP for the City will have considerable benefits, particularly providing greater clarity and certainty over development opportunities and managing the growth of the City.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan - Chapter C43 - Werrington Signals Site, Corner Great Western Highway and French Street, Werrington be received

2.     Council endorse the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan (provided separately to Councillors and available on Council’s website), amended in accordance with recommendation RC43 and RB4 as appearing in Attachment 1 relating to Werrington Signals Site, Corner Great Western Highway and French Street, Werrington.

3.     Where there is an inconsistency between the earlier recommendations related to this matter and the resolution to this report, the resolution to this report prevails for the purpose of amending the Planning Proposal.

4.     The General Manager be granted delegation to make any necessary minor changes required to the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan before submitting it to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure.

5.     Council endorse the Planning Proposal for Penrith Local Environmental Plan to be forwarded to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure with a request that the Minister consider the changes made to the Planning Proposal in response to the public exhibition, and make a determination as to whether the Planning Proposal is to be re-exhibited in accordance with s58 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

6.       The Minister be requested to make the plan in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, should he determine that re-exhibition is not required.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

1. View

C43 - Werrington Signals Site – Corner Great Western Highway and French Street Werrington

26 Pages

Attachment

   


 

 

Outcome 3 - We can get around the City

 

 

There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

8        Tender Reference 13/14-03, Provision of Quarry Products, Top Soil, Turf, Softfall & Synthetic Turf                                                                                                                                   84

 

9        Tender Reference 13/14-05 Path Construction and Associated Works of River Road, Emu Plains                                                                                                                                           92

 

10      Great River Walk Stage 7b grant                                                                                     96

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

8

Tender Reference 13/14-03, Provision of Quarry Products, Top Soil, Turf, Softfall & Synthetic Turf   

 

Compiled by:               Gowry Gowrythasan, Civil Operations Engineer

Matthew Morris, Parks Program Co-ordinator

Brendan McLister, Project Engineer

Authorised by:            Hans Meijer, City Works Manager   

 

Outcome

We have safe, vibrant places

Strategy

Improve our public spaces and places

Service Activity

Manage and maintain the City's sports grounds, parks and open space

       

 

Executive Summary

A tender for the provision of quarry products, top soil, turf, soft fall and various synthetic turf on an as required basis for an initial period of three (3) years, with an option to extend for a further two (2) x one (1) year periods, was advertised on 16 and 20 August 2013 and closed on 12 September 2013.

 

This report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process to establish a preferred supplier list and recommends that the tenders from:

 

·    Boral Resources (NSW)  Pty Limited – Quarry Products,

·    Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd – Quarry Products & Top Soil,

·    Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd – Top Soil & Soft Fall,

·    Astec Mulch Pty Ltd – Soft Fall,

·    A&J Pattern Turf – Turf,

·    Manoeuvre Mow Pty Limited t/as Sustainable Turf Renovations & Equipment – Turf,

·    Creative Recreation Solutions Pty Ltd – Synthetic Turf, and

·    Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces Australia Pty Ltd – Synthetic Turf

 

be accepted for the quarry products, top soil, turf, soft fall and various synthetic turf for a period of three (3) years, with an option to extend for a further two (2) x (1) year periods.

Background

The purpose of this Tender was to establish a preferred list of Contractors (panel) to perform part or all of the following services on an ‘as required’ basis throughout the term of the agreement. The preferred list of contractors will be capable of providing the following services:

·    Quarry Products

·    Top Soil

·    Turf

·    Playground Soft Fall

·    Various Synthetic Turf


Tenders were advertised in the Western Weekender and the e-tendering website on 16 August 2013 and the Sydney Morning Herald on 20 August 2013 for the provision of quarry products, top soil, turf, soft fall and various synthetic turf.

 

Tenderers were required to submit their tender either by using the online Portal on the e-tendering website or a hard copy on a standard pro forma sheet, which clearly identified the required response against each of the evaluation criteria.


Tenderers were also required to complete a price schedule setting out the unit rates for quarry products, top soil, turf, soft fall and various synthetic turf.

 

All prospective tenderers were invited to attend a pre-tender briefing on 29 August 2013.  This briefing included an online demonstration on Council’s electronic tendering portal, and provided an opportunity for prospective tenderers to seek any necessary clarification of the specifications required to perform the tender.

 

Tender Evaluation Panel

The Tender Evaluation Panel consisted of Gowry Gowrythasan (Civil Operations Engineer), Matthew Morris (Parks Program Coordinator), Brendan McLister (Project Engineer), Laura Schuil (Supply Officer -Contracts) and was Chaired by Hans Meijer (City Works Manager).

 

Evaluation process

The process for the evaluation of tenders was as follows:

1.   Initial review of tenders to determine compliance with the evaluation criteria, including the ability of tenderers to provide the full range of services specified;

2.   Assessment of costs based on the unit rates tendered and the allocated staff to perform the services, and determination of a short-list based on the best rankings from 1 above.

 

Tender Evaluation Criteria

The selection criteria advertised and used in assessing the tenders were:

 

Scope of Requirements

·    Demonstrated Ability

·    Cost / Price Category

·    Resources and Personnel

·    Quality Assurance

·    Environmental Management

·    Industrial Relations

·    Work Health & Safety

 

Summary of Tenders Received

A total of nine (9) submissions were received from the following respondents (listed in alphabetical order) in response to the advertised tender:

 

 

 

Tenderer’s Name

Address

Tendered for

A & J Patten Turf

144 Lieutenant Bowen Road,
Bowen Mountain NSW 2753

Turf

Astec Mulch Pty Ltd

PO Box 4348, Penrith Plaza, Penrith NSW 2750

Soft Fall

Aussie Synthetic Grass and Rubber

4/35 Thurston Street,
Penrith New South Wales 2756

Synthetic Turf

Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd

317 Mona Vale Road,
Terrey Hills, NSW, 2084

Top Soil & Soft Fall

Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Limited

PO Box 42,
Wentworthville NSW 2145

Quarry Products:
New & Recycled

Creative Recreation Solutions Pty Ltd

Unit 1/ 25 Durgadin Drive,
Albion Park Rail, NSW, 2527

Synthetic Turf

Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd

Cnr Mamre Rd and Elizabeth Dr, Kemps Creek, New South Wales, 2178

Quarry Products:
New & Recycled

Top Soil

Manoeuvre Mow Pty Limited t/as Sustainable Turf Renovations & Equipment

264 McKee Road,
Theresa Park NSW 2570

Turf

Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces Australia Pty Ltd

3 Tepko Road,
Terrey Hills NSW 2084

Synthetic Turf

 

Details of the ownership and directors for each of the respondents are provided below:

 

Company

Names of business owners and/or names of the board of directors

A & J Patten Turf

Alan Geoffery Patten

Astec Mulch Pty Ltd

Matthew & Lorraine Vella

Aussie Synthetic Grass and Rubber

Jason Day

Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd

Patrick & Sharon Soars

Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Limited

Gregory Arthur Price, Joseph Loy Goss, Marios Pasas

Creative Recreation Solutions Pty Ltd

James Lee Tabone

Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd

Patrick James Hallinan

Manoeuvre Mow Pty Limited t-as Sustainable Turf Renovations & Equipment

Geoffrey Thomas Hatton & Phyllis Emily Hatton

Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces Australia Pty Ltd

Mark Cunningham

 

Criteria Evaluation

Following the evaluation of the nine (9) tenders, the Tender Evaluation Panel determined that all of the tenderers demonstrated compliance with each of the evaluation criteria.
         

Price Evaluation

Prices were requested for quarry products, top soil, turf, soft fall and various synthetic turf.

 

The tables below rank from lowest to highest the estimated annual expenditure for the tenderers that provide the best value for each type of products. To enable a full comparison of the unit rates submitted, a total annualised cost for each tenderer has been calculated, based on the annualised quantity of each products as stated in the tender documents. 

 

Quarry Products - New

Tenderer’s Name

Quarry Products - New

Estimated Annual Expenditure

Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Limited

Quarry Dust, River Sand, 75mm Aggregate, Blue Metal, 20mm, 10mm & 5mm Crushed Aggregates

$71,437

Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd

Quarry Dust, River Sand, 75mm Aggregate, Blue Metal, 20mm, 10mm & 5mm Crushed Aggregates

$103,100

 

Quarry Products - Recycled

Tenderer’s Name

Quarry Products - Recycled

Estimated Annual Expenditure

Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd

20mm DGB &
20mm DGB with 3-4% Cement

$14,260

Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Limited

20mm DGB &
20mm DGB with 3-4% Cement

$17,634

 

Top Soil

Tenderer’s Name

Material Type

Estimated Annual Expenditure

Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd

Screened Top Soil

$5,250

Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd

Screened Top Soil

$10,200

 

Turf

Tenderer’s Name

Turf Types

Estimated Annual Expenditure

A & J Patten Turf

Kikuyu, Greenless Park Couch &
Standard Soft Leaf Buffalo

$139,700

Manoeuvre Mow Pty Limited t/as

Sustainable Turf Renovations & Equipment

Kikuyu, Greenless Park Couch &
Standard Soft Leaf Buffalo

$176,755

 

Playground Soft Fall

Tenderer’s Name

Material Type

Estimated Annual Expenditure

Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd

10mm, 15mm Pine Bark

$30,250

Astec Mulch Pty Ltd

10mm, 15mm Pine Bark

$41,250

 

The Astec Mulch is preferred for playground soft fall for several key reasons including, the appearance of the product, the softness of the product, comfort levels while bare foot, and most importantly the product offers a higher level of absorption in fall zones. The Astec Mulch offers a higher fall height rating, at the same thickness as the ANL product, 4.0m as opposed to 3.1m. This is particularly important given the increasing use of play equipment higher than 3.1m. Overall the Astec Mulch is superior in presentation, functionality, and safety. The bark offered by Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd would be considered for locations where the bark is not required as soft fall.

 

 

Synthetic Turf – Adjacent to Pathways

Tenderer’s Name

Turf Types

Estimated Annual Expenditure

Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces Australia Pty Ltd

Synthetic Turf: 100 – 500mm width & 500 – 750mm width

$48,600*

Creative Recreation Solutions Pty Ltd

Synthetic Turf: 100 – 500mm width & 500 – 750mm width

$66,360

Aussie Synthetic Grass and Rubber

Synthetic Turf: 100 – 500mm width & 500 – 750mm width

$80,695

 

 

The tender required the rates to include supply and lay of the synthetic turf, as well as base preparation. *Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces Australia Pty Ltd did not provide rates for the preparation of the base for the synthetic turf, and therefore they were eliminated for this item. Due to the estimated annual quantity required and the ability to schedule works, the Panel were of the opinion that a secondary contractor was not required for this service.

 

 

Synthetic Turf – Cricket Pitches and Long Jump Run-ups

Tenderer’s Name

Turf Types

Estimated Annual Expenditure

Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces Australia Pty Ltd

Synthetic Turf: Cricket wickets

 

Synthetic Turf: Long Jump Run Ups

$80,000

 

$19,200

Creative Recreation Solutions Pty Ltd

Synthetic Turf: Cricket wickets

 

Synthetic Turf: Long Jump Run Ups

$241,200

 

$47,040

 

Due to the estimated annual quantity required, value for money, and the ability to schedule works the Panel were of the opinion that a secondary contractor was not required for this service.

 

Short Listed Tenders

Each tender was assessed against the evaluation criteria and the individual unit rates submitted.  The following companies have provided the best value to Council and are recommended to be placed on the Panel:

 

1.   Boral Resources (NSW)  Pty Limited – Quarry Products

2.   Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd – Quarry Products & Top Soil

3.   Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd – Top Soil & Soft Fall

4.   Astec Mulch Pty Ltd – Soft Fall

5.   A&J Pattern Turf – Turf

6.   Manoeuvre Mow Pty Limited t/as Sustainable Turf Renovations & Equipment - Turf

7.   Creative Recreation Solutions Pty Ltd – Synthetic Turf

8.   Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces Australia Pty Ltd – Synthetic Turf

 

An independent financial and referee check was not considered necessary by the Panel as there were no major risks to Council due to the nature of this contract. If the primary contractor is unable to provide the required products, then the secondary contractor shall be engaged, where nominated.

 

Conclusion

Based on the detailed evaluation of all tenders received, in particular the demonstrated capacity of the recommended tenderers and the prices submitted, the tenders that represent the best overall value for money to Council for each service is summarised below, in the preferred ranking.

 

The secondary supplier will act as a backup provider of the service should the primary contractor be unavailable to perform the work or deliver within the time required, or default in their responsibilities under the agreement.

Preferred List of Contractors (Panel)

Service Contract

Preferred Tenderer Ranking

Quarry Products - New

1.   Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Limited

2.   Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd

Quarry Products - Recycled

1.   Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd

2.   Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Limited

Top Soil

1.   Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd

2.   Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd

Turf

1.   A & J Patten Turf

2.   Manoeuvre Mow Pty Limited t/as Sustainable Turf Renovations & Equipment

Playground Soft Fall

1.   Astec Mulch Pty Ltd

2.   Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd

Synthetic Turf – Adjacent to Pathways

1.   Creative Recreation Solutions Pty Ltd

Synthetic Turf – Cricket Pitches and Long Jump Run-ups

 

1.   Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces Australia Pty Ltd.

 

 

Financial Services Manager’s Comments

The creation of these preferred supplier lists will ensure that Council can continue to support the organisation’s needs efficiently, while ensuring value for money for the work types detailed in this report is achieved.  The establishment of secondary providers, where appropriate, will allow for the workload to be managed without impacting on project timelines. Any works completed will be undertaken within established project budgets.

Tender Advisory Group (TAG) Comment

The Tender Advisory Group (TAG) consisting of the Chief Governance Officer, Stephen Britten and Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil, met to consider the tender for the provision of quarry products, top soil, turf, softfall and synthetic turf. The TAG supports the methodology used and the recommendations of the Tender Evaluation Panel.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 13/14-03, Provision of Quarry Products, Top Soil, Turf, Softfall & Synthetic Turf be received.

2.     A new 3 year contract with the option to extend for a further two (2) x one (1) year periods (subject to satisfactory performance) be awarded to the following companies for the specified services in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Tender:

a.   Provision of Quarry Products (New) be awarded to Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Limited as the primary contractor and Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd as the secondary contractor

b.   Provision of Quarry Products (Recycled) be awarded to Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd as the primary contractor and Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Limited as the secondary contractor

c.   Provision of Top Soil be awarded to Hi Quality Waste Management Pty Ltd as the primary contractor and Australian Native Landscape Pty Ltd as the secondary contractor

d.   Provision of Turf be awarded to A&J Patten Turf as the primary contractor and Manoeuvre Mow Pty Limited t/as Sustainable Turf Renovations & Equipment as the secondary contractor

e.   Provision of softfall be awarded to Astec Mulch Pty Ltd as the primary contractor and Australian Native Landscape Pty Ltd as the secondary contractor

f.    Provision of Synthetic Turf (adjacent to paths) be awarded to Creative Recreation Solutions Pty Ltd

g.   Provision of Synthetic Turf (cricket pitches and long jump run-ups) be awarded to Synthetic Grass and Rubber Surfaces Australia Pty Ltd .

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

9

Tender Reference 13/14-05 Path Construction and Associated Works of River Road, Emu Plains   

 

Compiled by:               Ju Li, Project Co-ordinator

Authorised by:            Michael Jackson, Major Projects Manager   

 

Outcome

We have safe, vibrant places

Strategy

Improve our public spaces and places

Service Activity

Provide designs and plans for Council's parks, buildings, roads and drains

       

 

Executive Summary

A tender (RFT 13/14-05) for Path Construction and Associated Works of River Road, Emu Plains, from Dewdney Road to the M4 overpass was advertised in the Western Weekender on 6 September 2013 and Sydney Morning Herald on 10 September 2013. The tender closed on 3 October 2013.

 

This report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process and recommends that the tender from Statewide Civil Pty Ltd be accepted for the scope of works outlined in the RFT 13/14-05 for a total amount of $1,223,438 (excluding GST), including:

 

·  Stage 1: Path construction and associated works for 510m starting from Dewdney Road with a fixed lump sum price of $600,000 (excluding GST).

·  Stage 2: Path construction and associated works for the remaining section to the M4 Overpass based on the tendered rates for the sum of $623,438 (excluding GST).

Background

This project involves the construction of the Great River Walk (Stage 7b) from Dewdney Road to the M4 overpass, Emu Plains on the western side of the Nepean River.

 

Council has received confirmation of grant funding of $270,000 under the Metropolitan Greenspace Program for specific projects that improve regionally significant open space for recreational purposes (refer to separate report in business paper).  Council’s matching contribution is comprised of the S94 District Open Space Contributions and construction of kerb and gutter from the 2013/14 Kerb and Drainage Construction Program.

 

Under the same funding model, Council has recently completed approximately 550m of the shared path along River Road, Emu Plains in addition to the previously completed approximately 460m length of shared path.  The current tender is for the construction of a further 1260m of shared path along the River Road, Emu Plains from Dewdney Road to the M4 overpass including concrete path, kerb & gutter, road re-sheeting, handrails, signage and line marking. Where the grass verge on a steep embankment is narrow, the path is designed to be built on steel piles with decked concrete.

 

At the time of tender, only the funding of $600,000 (excluding GST) had been confirmed, therefore the tenderer was required to nominate the linear length they could perform with the fixed lump sum pricing of $600,000 (excluding GST). The tenderer was also required to provide responses to the full scope of works in the form of Schedule of Rates & Prices to allow for staged path construction based on subsequent funding availability. During the tendering review, the additional funding allocation for the remaining stage of the works has been confirmed.

Tender Evaluation Process

The Tender Evaluation Committee consisted of Ari Fernando (Major Projects and Design Coordinator), Ju Li (Project Coordinator), Laura Schuil (Supply Officer – Contracts), Jake Evans (Assistant Supply Officer) and was chaired by Michael Jackson (Major Projects Manager). Stuart Benzie from the Office of General Manager was appointed as the Probity Advisor (a probity advisor is appointed where the estimated value of the tender is greater than $1m).The selection criteria advertised and used in assessing the tenders included the following:

 

·    Business References

·    Demonstrated Ability

·    Works Method and Program

·    Financials

·    Employment Policies (Apprenticeships & Industrial Relations)

·    Quality Assurance Systems

·    Environmental Management Systems

·    Work Health & Safety (WHS)

Initial Tender Review

A full listing of the tenders received including business addresses and company owners / directors is listed below in alphabetical order

 

Tenderer

Business Address

Owners/Directors

Collective Civil Pty Ltd

51/45 Powers Road

Seven Hills NSW 2147

Rob Hanepen

Enwon Australia Pty Ltd

Unit 2/35 Jack Williams Dr

Penrith NSW 2750

Robert Raams and Clark Kay

JK Williams Contracting Pty Ltd

44 Jack Williams Drive

Penrith NSW 2750

Leigh Hartog (Managing Director)

Guy Williams (General Manager)

Statewide Civil Pty Ltd

13/36 Abbott Road, Seven Hills NSW 2147

Michael Dominello

The Glascott Group Pty Ltd

Unit 4, 15-17 Chaplin Drive

Lane Cove NSW 2066

Matthew Glascott

 

The tender from JK Williams Contracting Pty Ltd did not provide all the required rates & prices as required in the Tender Schedules for the full scope of works (Dewdney to M4) required under RFT 13/14-05, therefore it was deemed as a non-conforming tender and was not considered further.

 

A full listing of the tenders received and considered is detailed below in the final rank order.  The length of path to be supplied is measured from the starting point at Dewdney Road.

 

Tenderer

 Nominated Length for $600,000

 Final Rank

Statewide Civil Pty Ltd

510m

1

The Glascott Group Pty Ltd

447m

2

Collective Civil Pty Ltd

423m

3

Enwon Australia Pty Ltd

315m

4

JK Williams Contracting Pty Ltd

310m

Non Conforming Tender

 

Each tender was evaluated against the above evaluation criteria to determine an initial ranking.  The Schedule of Rates and the proposed linear metre length to be delivered were then considered to determine the best value for money solution, with competency in technical aspects of the tender.

 

It was confirmed that the relativity of tenders was consistent whether evaluated in terms of linear metre length or as an estimated lump sum for the full scope of works from Dewdney to the M4. The Committee were of the opinion that there was no advantage to give further consideration to the two higher priced tenders received from Collective Civil Pty Ltd and Enwon Australia Pty Ltd.

 

The lowest two tenders were asked to review their tender responses and provide a total lump sum price for the full scope of works being from Dewdney Road to the M4, which is summation of all the rates and price items included in the original tender submission under RFT 13/14-05.  The path construction method varies along its length, so the total price calculation is not a simple extrapolation of a single $/m rate.

Evaluation of the Preferred Tender

The tendered linear metre length for the fixed lump sum pricing of $600,000 (excluding GST) from Statewide Civil Pty Ltd was 63m longer than the tendered length from The Glascott Group Pty Ltd. Statewide Civil Pty Ltd’s total price of $1,223,438 (excluding GST) for the full scope of the works from Dewdney Road to the M4 was 7% lower than the total price of $1,308,967 (excluding GST) from The Glascott Pty Ltd. Therefore, the tender from Statewide Civil Pty Ltd was considered by the Tender Evaluation Committee to be providing the highest value for money compared to the next on the ranking list.

 

The Statewide Civil Pty Ltd was subjected to an independent financial evaluation in October 2013 and received a positive financial evaluation.

 

The tenderer advised that a minimum of 28 days for site mobilisation after contract signing would be required to allow for material ordering and off site steel fabrication and a further 18 weeks for construction works on site, thus minimising the interruptions to the nearby residents & traffic along the River Road.

 

Statewide Civil Pty Ltd has demonstrated that they have appropriate construction experience in undertaking similar projects for local councils in the Sydney metropolitan area. They have well documented environmental management plans, quality management and waste management plans. They have nominated sufficiently skilled staff to manage and supervise the project.

Financial Services Manager’s Comment

As highlighted earlier in this Report, Council sought and received independent reference, financial, and performance checks for Statewide Civil Pty Ltd. These checks were completed by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd and have been reviewed by Financial Services in conjunction with other relevant financial information provided. Based on this review no concerns were raised as to the ability of Statewide Civil Pty Ltd to perform the works described. As detailed in the a separate report to tonight’s meeting funding has been secured for the project through the Metropolitan Greenspace Program, and once combined with allocations to the Great River Walk within Council’s 2013-14 Operational Plan included a reprioritising of works included in the road reseal and resheet program.   The total tendered price by Statewide Civil Pty Ltd of $1,223,438 (excluding GST) is within the available budget.

Probity Advisor Comment

Based on a review of the information available and the assessment process undertaken I am of the opinion that there has been a considered and equitable approach by the Tender Evaluation Committee to all of the tenderers received, and that the assessment has occurred in an appropriate manner. I support the recommendations contained within the report.

Tender Advisory Group (TAG) Comment

The Tender Advisory Group (TAG) consisting of the Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil and Governance Officer, Adam Beggs met to consider the tender for the construction of the shared path for the Great River Walk. The TAG supports the process and the recommendations contained within the Report.

Conclusion

The Tender Evaluation Committee is of the opinion that Statewide Civil Pty Ltd has provided the most advantageous tender and it is recommended that Satewide Civil Pty Ltd be awarded the contract for Tender Reference 13/14-05 Path Construction and Associated Works of River Road, Emu Plains for an amount of $1,223,438 (excluding GST).

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 13/14-05 Path Construction and Associated Works of River Road, Emu Plains be received.

2.     Statewide Civil Pty Ltd be awarded the contract for Path Construction and Associated Works of River Road, Emu Plains from Dewdney Road to M4 overpass for the amount of $1,223,438 (excluding GST).

3.     The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all documentation if necessary.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

10

Great River Walk Stage 7b grant   

 

Compiled by:               Karin Schicht, Landscape Architecture Supervisor

Authorised by:            Michael Jackson, Major Projects Manager  

 

Outcome

We have safe, vibrant places

Strategy

Improve our public spaces and places

Service Activity

Provide designs and plans for Council's parks, buildings, roads and drains

       

 

Executive Summary

Council has been successful in obtaining $270,000 for Stage 7b of the Great River Walk (West Bank Construction Phase 4) in the 2012 Metropolitan Greenspace Program.  The report recommends that the information contained in the report be received, that Council accept the grant funds and send letters of thanks to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure and project supporters Great River Walk Inc. and Hawkesbury City Council.

Background

The grant application under the NSW Department of Planning’s Metropolitan Greenspace Program (MGP) was lodged on 5 October 2012. In the 2012 MGP, a total of 23 successful projects were approved with grants totalling nearly $2,500,000 on a dollar-for-dollar basis.  To date, Penrith City Council has received a total of $1,611,642 for the Great River Walk (GRW), under the MGP grant program since 2003.

Current Situation

A grant of $270,000 has been approved by the MGP for Stage 7b as evidenced on the MGP website and a media release from The Hon Brad Hazzard, Minister for Planning and Infrastructure, dated 30 September 2013. The formal agreement from the Department is expected shortly.

 

Construction of Stage 7a starting at Francis Avenue commenced early June 2013 and has extended to Dewdney Rd. Stage 7b will involve the continued construction implementation of the shared pedestrian cycleway along River Road, Emu Plains.  Grant funds will be supplemented with additional District Open Space Section 94 funds with the aim of reaching the M4 bridge (refer to separate report in business paper for Tender Reference 13/14-05). Works will be based on the designs and documentation prepared by consultants in previous stages and other grants such as the Federal government’s Liveable Cities Program. 

 

The grant funding for this project is $270,000. Council’s matching contribution is proposed as follows:

1.   $110,000 from City Works’ River Road Drainage, kerb and gutter program; and

2.   $160,000 from the District Open Space Contributions Plan. 

 

As a condition of the grant, the project should be completed within 24 months from acceptance. 

 

 

Financial Services Manager’s Comment

Acceptance of the grant offer for Stage 7b of the Great River Walk commits Council to matching funding of $270,000. The progression of the Great River Walk has been a priority for a number of years and the completion of this section along River Road will represent a significant milestone.  As endorsed by Council at the time of lodging the grant application, the proposed matching funding, will be sourced by a combination of $110,000 from the 2013-14 City Works River Road kerb, gutter, and drainage program, and a further $160,000 from the District Open Space Contributions Plan. Councillors will recall recently establishing a priority for the funds available within the District Open Space Plan and this project was nominally included in the allocation to the River Precinct.  The projected balance of the District Open Space Contributions Plan as at 30 June 2014, after taking this contribution into consideration, is $4.7m.

Conclusion

The MGP has supported the GRW in Penrith with grant funding since 2003.  This stage will build upon the GRW momentum achieved to date.  Council’s endorsement is sought to accept the grant funds of $270,000 from the MGP.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on Great River Walk Stage 7b grant be received.

2.     Council accept the grant offer of $270,000 under the Metropolitan Greenspace Program 2012 and confirm the reallocation of Council’s matching contribution as detailed in the report.

3.     Letters of thanks and notification be sent to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure, and project supporters Great River Walk Inc. and Hawkesbury City Council.

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report.  


 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK  INTENTIONALLY


Outcome 5 - We care about our environment

 

Item                                                                                                                                                Page

 

11      WSROC Tender WR02-12/13, Handling and Treatment of Hazardous Waste including Asbestos                                                                                                                                         101

 

12      Complaint process and the regulations relating to uncovered loads of heavy vehicles travelling within the Penrith Local Government Area                                                                   108

 

13      Penrith City Council Floodplain Management Framework                                            111

 

 



Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

11

WSROC Tender WR02-12/13, Handling and Treatment of Hazardous Waste including Asbestos   

 

Compiled by:               Gowry Gowrythasan, Civil Operations Engineer

Authorised by:            Hans Meijer, City Works Manager   

 

Outcome

We care for our environment

Strategy

Protect and improve our natural areas, the Nepean River and other waterways

Service Activity

Contribute to the protection and enhancement of the City's natural environment

       

 

Executive Summary

A WSROC tender for the Handling and Treatment of Hazardous Waste Including Asbestos was advertised on 28 May 2013 and closed on 10 July 2013.

This tender was to establish a panel containing a number of Contractors ranked in order of preference based on the evaluation criteria specified in the tender documents.

This report advises Council of the outcome of the tender process and recommends that a panel of preferred contractors be established in order of preference as listed below:

 

1.   RMA Contracting Pty Ltd t/a RMA Group (Asbestos handling only)

2.   Affective Services Australia Pty Limited (Asbestos and Chemical handling)

3.   Dolomatrix Trading as Toxfree Pty Ltd (Asbestos handling only)

 

The service is on an “as required” basis for a period of three (3) years with an option to extend the arrangements for a further two (2) x one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory performance and allowing for rise and fall provisions.

Background

WSROC conducted investigations that identified a need for a contract to cover the handling and treatment of hazardous waste materials including asbestos.

 

The following Councils agreed to participate in this group tender:

Auburn City Council, Bankstown City Council, Blacktown City Council, Blue Mountains City Council, Fairfield City Council, Hawkesbury City Council, Holroyd City Council, Liverpool City Council, Parramatta City Council and Penrith City Council.

 

The scope of services was determined through direct consultation with the key stakeholders at each Council.

 

Tenders were advertised in the Sydney Morning Herald and the Blacktown Sun on 28 May 2013 and also posted on WSROC’s e-tendering web site. Tenders closed on 10 July 2013.

The intention is to establish standing offer agreements, between the participating Councils and each of the panel providers, for the Handling and Treatment of Hazardous Waste Including Asbestos on an “as required” basis for a term of three (3) years with an option to extend the arrangements for a further two (2) x one (1) year periods, with provision for rise and fall and subject to ongoing satisfactory performance.

It was stated in the tender documents that the desired outcome from the process was to establish one or more panels with each containing a number of Contractors ranked in order of preference and value for money based on the evaluation criteria specified in the documents.

It was also stated that tenderers may submit an offer for part or all of the services but in each case must submit a complete offer for each of the following identified work categories.

a)    Removal, transport and disposal of illegally dumped and in situ bonded asbestos.

b)    Removal, transport and disposal by recycling or other approved method of other hazardous/non-hazardous chemical or unidentified substances including bulk handling of liquids.

c)    Carry out identification and detailed analysis of unknown substances either abandoned or stored (eg: at Council depot or on site following HAZMAT response to contain substance) will form part of both categories of the specified works.

The range of services covered by this tender included:

·     Removal, transport and disposal of illegally dumped and in situ non friable (bonded) and friable asbestos

·     Identification, classification and segregation of unknown substances either abandoned or stored

·     Removal, storage transport and disposal by recycling or other approved method of other hazardous/non-hazardous chemicals or unidentified substances

·     The re-packaging / re-drumming and consolidation of any intractable chemicals

·     Decanting / transfer, transport and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous bulk liquids and chemicals

·     Keeping detailed records of collected material, including types and volumes, for each Council area.

 

Tender Evaluation Panel

 

The Tender Evaluation Panel consisted of Mal Ackerman (Procurement Coordinator, WSROC), Gowry Gowrythasan (Civil Operations Engineer, Penrith City Council), Laura Schuil (Supply Officer Contracts, Penrith City Council), Alan Campbell (WHS Advisor, Contracting, Liverpool City Council) and Ben Rodwell (Supply Coordinator, Hawkesbury City Council).

 

 

Summary of Tenders Received

A total of eight (8) responses were received from the following companies (listed in alphabetical order) in accordance with the Conditions of Tendering:

 

 

Tenderer’s Name

Location of the Business

Affective Services Australia Pty Limited

111-117 Montague Street
Wollongong NSW 2500

Absolute Environmental Services Pty Ltd

38 Thorn Street
Pennant Hills NSW 2120

Beasy Pty Ltd

16 Orchardleigh Street
Yennora NSW 2161

Dolomatrix Trading as Toxfree Pty Ltd

40 Christie Street  
St Marys NSW 2760

LMS Demolition Pty Ltd

30 Verlie Street South
Wentworthville NSW 2145

P & D Bamford Enterprises Ltd
t/a Lidoran Group Pty Ltd

13 Egerton Street
Silverwater NSW 2128

P&D Envirotech Pty Ltd

13 Rivulet Crescent
Albion Park Rail NSW 2527

RMA Contracting Pty Ltd
t/a RMA Group

12/6-20 Braidwood Street
Strathfield South  NSW 2136

 

 

Tender Evaluation

 

All tenders, except for LMS Demolition Pty Ltd, were submitted in compliance with the tender requirements and met the Conditions for Participation. 

 

LMS Demolition Pty Ltd did not fully comply with Asbestos Licensing requirements and they did not hold an appropriate transport licence, and were therefore eliminated at this stage for both asbestos and chemical handling.

 

Compliance Evaluation

 

All Tenders were evaluated to assess the risk associated with responses to:

a)  Conformance to reasonable price range

b)  Compliance with Conditions of Tender

c)  Compliance with the Proposed Conditions of Contract

d)  Compliance with the Statement of Requirement and Specification

e)  Tenderer Details

f)  Tenderer's Declaration


It was stated in the tender documents that tenderers may submit an offer for either Asbestos Handling or Chemical Handling and Processing or both, in either case tenderers were required to provide a submission for NATA approved laboratory testing of materials. It was clearly indicated that “part offers” within the stated categories would not be considered. Following a high level review of each tenderer’s submission the following was determined:-

 

·    Affective Services Australia Pty Limited; Complies and was included for all categories.

·    Absolute Environmental Services Pty Ltd; Submitted a part offer for all categories of work as the price schedule used in submitting their tender was not the latest version (Revision 2) issued with Addendum:2, which included additional specific requirements regarding air monitoring for asbestos and material testing across both categories. In accordance with the conditions of tender they were excluded from further consideration.

·    Beasy Pty Ltd; Submitted a part offer for chemical handling and were therefore only included in the final assessment for asbestos handling.

·    Dolomatrix Trading as Toxfree Pty Ltd; Submitted a part offer only for chemical handling and were therefore only considered for asbestos handling.

·    P & D Bamford Enterprises Ltd t/a Lidoran Group Pty Ltd; Also submitted a part offer for all categories of work as the price schedule used  in submitting their tender was not the latest version (Revision 2) issued with Addendum:2, which included additional specific requirements regarding air monitoring for asbestos and material testing across both categories. In accordance with the conditions of tender they were excluded from further consideration. 

·    P&D Envirotech Pty Ltd; Submitted a part offer for all categories of work as the price schedule used  in submitting their tender was not the latest version (Revision 2) issued with Addendum:2. The revised document included specific additional requirements regarding air monitoring for asbestos and material testing across both categories. In accordance with the conditions of tender they were excluded from further consideration.

·     RMA Contracting Pty Ltd t/a RMA Group; Submitted a part offer for chemical Handling and were therefore only included in the final assessment for asbestos handling.

 

The following tenderers progressed to the next stage of the evaluation.

 

Tenderer

Assessed for

Affective Services Australia Pty Limited

Chemical and Asbestos Handling

Beasy Pty Ltd

Asbestos Handling Only

Dolomatrix Trading as Toxfree Pty Ltd

Asbestos Handling Only

RMA Contracting Pty Ltd t/a RMA Group

Asbestos Handling Only

 

 

Tenderer

Directors

     Affective Services Australia Pty Limited

Gene Eric Stewart

     Beasy Pty Ltd

Bret William Baker

     Dolomatrix Trading as Toxfree Pty Ltd

Richard Peter Allen, Stephen James Gostlow & Robet John McKinnon

     RMA Contracting Pty Ltd  t/a RMA Group

Andrew Alan Mayes, George Jabbour & Phillip David Gillespie

 

 

Technical worth (Evaluation Criteria)

 

An evaluation was carried out, for each of the remaining tenderers, to assess the technical worth against the evaluation criteria. These were:

·    Demonstrated Capability in performing the services

·    Recycling and disposal

·    Personnel Capability

·    Collection and Transport

·    Response Times

·    Pricing (not weighted)

·    Industrial Relations

·    WH&S Management

·    Quality Assurance Management

·    Social Responsibility

·    Environmental Management

 

All four (4) tenderers were compliant with the above Evaluation Criteria.

 

Price Evaluation

 

The tendered unit rates for each Company were annualised based on standard range of anticipated activity levels. Unfortunately there is insufficient historical data to estimate with any accuracy anticipated activity levels, however the annualised rates below show the relativity between each tenderer.

 

The table below shows the annualised cost based only on asbestos handling as it is considered that this service will account for approximately 70% of the annual expenditure for each Council.

 

In calculating the annualised cost, it was considered that the service would be provided on a split of 80% at normal time and 20% at overtime rates. The estimated time for each site visit was 5 hours. It was assumed that a team of three (two labourers and a supervisor) would undertake this service. An assumption of 10% of the time was considered for Air Monitoring and 200 tonnes of asbestos across the 10 participating Councils was considered for disposal in calculating the annualised costs. The estimated quantity of 24 tonnes was considered for the Penrith Local Government Area. Approximately 90% of the total costs relate to labour, supervision, air monitoring, testing and analysis of samples and the issue of clearance certificates.

 

Annualised cost asbestos handling (lowest to highest)

 

Tenderer

Asbestos Handling annualised Costs
(for WSROC)

Asbestos Handling annualised Costs
(for PCC)

RMA Contracting Pty Ltd t/a RMA Group

$538,605.00

$70,800.00

Affective Services Australia Pty Limited

$604,681.47

$75,308.80

Dolomatrix Trading as Toxfree Pty Ltd.

$746,242.75

$95,156.00

Beasy Pty Ltd.

$954,240.00

$138,300.00

 

A cost comparison for Chemical handling was not undertaken as there was only one (1) tenderer (Affective Services Australia Pty Limited) that met all of the requirements for the specified services by submitting a full offer for all components. To determine whether the rates offered by Affective Services Australia Pty Limited were competitive, the Panel compared the rates with those submitted by non complying tenderers. Where a comparison was possible, the rates submitted by Affective Services Australia Pty limited were lower than the rates offered by the non complying tenderers.

         

Financial and Referee Check

 

A financial and referee check was carried out by an external agency. All of the tenderers received a satisfactory report.

 

Conclusion

 

Following the price and non-price evaluation of the tenders along with other relevant risk assessment checks the Tender Evaluation Panel recommends that the following three Companies be included onto a “panel of approved” contractors on the basis of a unit price standing offer agreement for a period of  three (3) years with an option to extend the arrangements for a further 2 x 1 year periods subject to satisfactory performance and with provision for rise & fall and that these are ranked in order of preference shown below;

1.   RMA Contracting Pty Ltd t/a RMA Group (ranked 1 for Asbestos Handling only)

2. Affective Services Australia Pty Limited (ranked 2 for Asbestos Handling and     ranked 1 for Chemical Handling)

3.   Dolomatrix Trading as Toxfree Pty Ltd (ranked 3 for Asbestos Handling only)

The second and third ranked contractor will act as a backup provider of the service should the first ranked (primary) contractor fail in their obligations or become unable to meet the required works program or timeframe required to deliver a specific service.

 

Preferred Tenderer Ranking – Asbestos Handling Only

Rank

Tenderer’s Name

1

RMA Contracting Pty Ltd t/a RMA Group

2

Affective Services Australia Pty Limited

3

Dolomatrix Trading as Toxfree Pty Ltd

 

 

Preferred Tenderer Ranking – Chemical Handling Only

Rank

Tenderer’s Name

1

Affective Services Australia Pty Limited

 

 

Financial Services Manager’s Comment

 

The creation of these preferred supplier lists will ensure that Council can continue to support the organisation’s needs efficiently, while ensuring value for money for the work types detailed in this report is achieved.  Included in the assessment of the tenders was the commissioning of independent reference checks, financial analysis, and performance analysis.  These assessments were reviewed by WSROC as part of the tender process and WSROC have advised that no issues were identified.  Given the nature of the tender, in establishing a preferred supplier list, it is not considered further financial assessments by Council staff are required as Council’s financial exposure has been mitigated by the payment terms.  Any works completed will be undertaken within established project budgets.

 

Tender Advisory Group (TAG) Comment

 

The Tender Advisory Group (TAG) consisting of the Chief Governance Officer, Stephen Britten and the Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil, met to consider the tender for the handling and treatment of hazardous waste including asbestos. The TAG supports the recommendations made by the Tender Evaluation Panel.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That:

1.     The information contained in the report on WSROC Tender WR02-12/13, Handling and Treatment of Hazardous Waste including Asbestos be received.

2.     A three (3) year contract, for the provision of Handling and Treatment of Hazardous Waste including Asbestos, with an option to extend for a further two (2) x one (1) year periods, subject to satisfactory performance and with provision for rise and fall, be awarded:

a.   for the Asbestos Handling Services: RMA Contracting Pty Ltd t/a RMA Group as the primary contractor and Affective Services Australia Pty Limited as the secondary contractor, Dolomatrix Trading as Toxfree Pty Ltd as the third ranked contractor. 

b.   for the Chemical Handling services: Affective Services Australia Pty Limited.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES

There are no attachments for this report


Ordinary Meeting                                                                                           25 November 2013

 

 

 

12

Complaint process and the regulations relating to uncovered loads of heavy vehicles travelling within the Penrith Local Government Area   

 

Compiled by:               Barry Ryan, RID Squad Co-ordinator

Noel Fuller, Co-ordinator Ranger and Animal Services

Authorised by:            Tracy Chalk, Waste and Community Protection Manager  

Requested By:             Councillor John Thain

 

Outcome

We care for our environment

Strategy

Support our communities to live more sustainably and use resources wisely

Service Activity

Manage resource recovery and waste collection services

       

 

Executive Summary

Uncovered loads of waste and other materials can cause issues to other drivers on the road by pieces of material falling from the vehicle, creating obstructions on the roads for drivers to have to dangerously manoeuvre around and causing litter.

 

Legislation provides for considerable fines to be issued to drivers of uncovered loads, and fines are issued by Rangers and RID Squad Investigation officers for such offences.

 

Background

Uncovered loads is a term that generally refers to waste and other materials that are being transported in trucks, trailers and utilities without suitable covering that will prevent that load from escaping (whether being wind blown, or simply coming off the vehicle when it turns a corner or goes over a bump in