21 October 2015
Dear Councillor,
In pursuance of the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 and the Regulations thereunder, notice is hereby given that an ORDINARY MEETING of Penrith City Council is to be held in the Council Chambers, Civic Centre, 601 High Street, Penrith on Monday 26 October 2015 at 7:30PM.
Attention is directed to the statement accompanying this notice of the business proposed to be transacted at the meeting.
Yours faithfully
Barry Husking
Acting General Manager
BUSINESS
1. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Leave of absence has been granted to:
Councillor Greg Davies - 22 October 2015 to 30 October 2015 inclusive.
2. APOLOGIES
3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Ordinary Meeting - 28 September 2015.
4. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Pecuniary Interest (The Act requires Councillors who declare a pecuniary interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)
Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Significant and Less than Significant (The Code of Conduct requires Councillors who declare a significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in an item to leave the meeting during discussion of that item)
5. ADDRESSING COUNCIL
6. MAYORAL MINUTES
7. NOTICES OF MOTION TO RESCIND A RESOLUTION
8. NOTICES OF MOTION AND QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
9. ADOPTION OF REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEES
Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 12 October 2015.
Policy Review Committee Meeting - 19 October 2015.
10. DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS
11. REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS
12. URGENT BUSINESS
13. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Monday 26 October 2015
table of contents
ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR
STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION OF PENRITH CITY’S ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CULTURAL HERITAGE
PRAYER
COUNCIL CHAMBER seating arrangements
meeting calendar
confirmation of minutes
PROCEDURE FOR ADDRESSING COUNCIL MEETING
MAYORAL MINUTES
report and recommendations of committees
DELIVERY program reports
ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR
Australians all let us rejoice,
For we are young and free;
We’ve golden soil and wealth for toil;
Our home is girt by sea;
Our land abounds in nature’s gifts
Of beauty rich and rare;
In history’s page, let every stage
Advance Australia Fair.
In joyful strains then let us sing,
Advance Australia Fair.
Beneath our radiant Southern Cross
We’ll toil with hearts and hands;
To make this Commonwealth of ours
Renowned of all the lands;
For those who’ve come across the seas
We’ve boundless plains to share;
With courage let us all combine
To Advance Australia Fair.
In joyful strains then let us sing,
Advance Australia Fair.
Statement of Recognition of
Penrith City’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage
Council values the unique status of Aboriginal people as the original owners and custodians of lands and waters, including the land and waters of Penrith City.
Council values the unique status of Torres Strait Islander people as the original owners and custodians of the Torres Strait Islands and surrounding waters.
We work together for a united Australia and City that respects this land of ours, that values the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage, and provides justice and equity for all.
PRAYER
“Sovereign God, tonight as we gather together as a Council we affirm that you are the giver and sustainer of life. We come together as representatives of our community to make decisions that will benefit this city and the people within it.
We come not in a spirit of competition, not as adversaries, but as colleagues. Help us to treat each other with respect, with dignity, with interest and with honesty. Help us not just to hear the words we say, but also to hear each others hearts. We seek to be wise in all that we say and do.
As we meet, our concern is for this city. Grant us wisdom, courage and strength.
Lord, help us. We pray this in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.”
Council Chambers
Seating Arrangements
For members of the public addressing the meeting
Lectern
Executive Managers
Clr Marcus Cornish
North Ward
Clr Bernard Bratusa
South Ward
Clr Tricia Hitchen
East Ward
Clr Ben Goldfinch
South Ward
Clr Mark Davies
South Ward
Clr Jim Aitken OAM
South
Ward
Clr Kevin Crameri OAM
North Ward
Clr Maurice Girotto
East Ward
Clr Jackie Greenow OAM
East Ward
Clr Michelle Tormey
North Ward
Clr Ross Fowler
OAM
North Ward
Clr John Thain
North Ward
Clr Greg Davies
East Ward
Clr Prue Car MP
East Ward
Executive
Managers
2015 MEETING CALENDAR
January 2015 - December 2015
(adopted by Council on 24/11/14 and amended by Council on 25/5/15 & 27/7/15)
|
TIME |
JAN |
FEB |
MAR |
APRIL |
MAY |
JUNE |
JULY |
AUG |
SEPT |
OCT |
NOV |
DEC |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
Mon |
||
Ordinary Council Meeting |
7.30pm |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21^ü (7.00pm) |
|
|
14 (7.00pm) |
|
23@ |
23 |
27v |
25# |
29* |
27 |
24@ |
28 |
26∞ |
23#+ |
|
||
Policy Review Committee |
7.00pm |
|
|
|
20 |
11 |
22 |
13 |
10 |
14 |
19 |
9 |
7 |
|
9 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
v |
Meeting at which the draft corporate planning documents (Delivery Program and Operational Plan) are endorsed for exhibition |
* |
Meeting at which the draft corporate planning documents (Delivery Program and Operational Plan) are adopted |
# |
Meetings at which the Operational Plan quarterly reviews (March and September) are presented |
@ |
Meetings at which the Delivery Program progress reports (including the Operational Plan quarterly reviews for December and June) are presented |
^ |
Election of Mayor/Deputy Mayor |
ü |
Meeting at which the 2013-2014 Annual Statements are presented |
∞ |
Meeting at which any comments on the 2013-2014 Annual Statements are presented |
+ |
Meeting at which the Annual Report is presented |
- Extraordinary Meetings are held as required.
- Members of the public are invited to observe meetings of the Council (Ordinary and Policy Review Committee).
Should you wish to address Council, please contact the Senior Governance Officer, Glenn Schuil.
OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF PENRITH CITY COUNCIL HELD IN THE
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ON MONDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2015 AT 7:34PM
NATIONAL ANTHEM
The meeting opened with the National Anthem.
STATEMENT OF RECOGNITION
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown read a statement of recognition of Penrith City’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage.
PRAYER
The Council Prayer was read by the Rev Neil Checkley.
PRESENT
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown, Deputy Mayor Ross Fowler OAM and Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Bernard Bratusa, Prue Car MP, Kevin Crameri OAM, Marcus Cornish, Greg Davies, Maurice Girotto, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow OAM, Tricia Hitchen, John Thain and Michelle Tormey.
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
273 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow that Leave of Absence be granted to Councillor Mark Davies from 28 September 2015 to 3 October 2015 inclusive.
APOLOGIES |
There were no apologies. |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Ordinary Meeting - 21 September 2015 |
274 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor John Thain that the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of 21 September 2015 be confirmed. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor John Thain declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 1 – Tender Reference 14/15-26 Weekly Council News Page & Quarterly Community Newsletter as his son is a journalist working for another newspaper, which did not submit a tender.
Councillor Kevin Crameri OA declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 6 – Development Application DA14/1550.01 Section 96 Application for Modifications to the Subdivision Layout (Village 6), Jordan Springs Lot 1125 DP1158660 Ninth Avenue, Jordan Springs Applicant: Maryland Development Company Pty Ltd; Owner: ~St Marys Land Limited as he is a resident of Llandilo.
Councillor Greg Davies declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 1 – Tender Reference 14/15-26 Weekly Council News Page & Quarterly Community Newsletter as his wife is the owner of another newspaper which circulates in the area.
Councillor Ross Fowler OAM declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 1 – Tender Reference 14/15-26 Weekly Council News Page & Quarterly Community Newsletter as he was a former Director and Secretary of one of the tenderers.
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Significant in Item 7 - Development Application DA14/0622.02 Section 96 Modification to Approved Earthworks, Shed and Truck Parking Including Amendment of the Approved Shed Location, Shed Design, Operational Conditions of Consent and Lighting at Lot 122 DP709303 (No. 41-47) Jolly Street, Castlereagh Applicant: Ty Gosling; Owner: ~Ty and Deanne Gosling, as her son was employed by a company owned by the applicants for the development. Councillor McKeown stated that she would not participate in any debate of these matters and she would leave the meeting during consideration of these items.
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Significant in Item 5 - Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 14 September 2015 (Item 1 – Rezoning Application (RZ15/0001) - 88-89 Nepean Gorge Drive, Mulgoa (Owner) Angas Securities Limited) as her husband owns a printing business and one of the persons addressing the meeting tonight, Dr Adrian Sheen, is a customer of her husband. Councillor McKeown indicated that she would leave the meeting during consideration of this item.
Councillor Ben Goldfinch declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 5 - Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 14 September 2015 (Item 1 – Rezoning Application (RZ15/0001) – 88-89 Nepean Gorge Drive, Mulgoa) as he is a resident of Mulgoa.
Councillor Tricia Hitchen declared a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 11 - Tender Reference RFT 15/16-03 Concrete Maintenance Works: Footpath and Kerb and Gutter as two of the tenderers are friends of hers. Councillor Hitchen indicated she would leave the meeting during consideration of this item.
SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS |
275 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM seconded Councillor Maurice Girotto that Standing Orders be suspended to allow members of the public to address the meeting, the time being 7:47 pm. |
Mr Adrian Sheen
Item 5 - Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 14 September 2015 (Item 1 – Rezoning Application (RX15/0001) – 88-89 Nepean Gorge Drive, Mulgoa (Owner) Angas Securities Limited (as Mortgagee in Possession)
Mr Sheen, a concerned neighbour, spoke in opposition to the recommendation. Mr Sheen outlined his concerns regarding the subdivision, including the loss of critically endangered shale transitional forest and the clearance of the land associated with the proposed subdivision. Mr Sheen also raised a concern regarding a possible non-adherence with Penrith LEP 2010.
Mr Peter Harvey
Item 5 - Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 14 September 2015 (Item 1 – Rezoning Application (RX15/0001) – 88-89 Nepean Gorge Drive, Mulgoa (Owner) Angas Securities Limited (as Mortgagee in Possession)
Mr Harvey, President of the Mulgoa Progress Association, spoke in opposition to the recommendation. Mr Harvey stated the spot rezoning should not be supported and that it should only be supported if the Council can guarantee that it will not create a precedent for Mulgoa. Mr Harvey then stated that, given that Council cannot guarantee that it will not create a precedent, the planning proposal should not be supported. Mr Harvey reiterated his points of address from the Policy Review Committee Meeting on 14 September 2015, in particular his concerns that important natural habitats will be affected by the proposed rezoning.
Arthur Ilias
Item 6 – DA 15/1550.01 Section 96 Application for Modifications to the Subdivision Layout (Village 6), Jordan Springs Lot 1125 DP1158660 Ninth Avenue, Jordan Springs
Mr Ilias, spokesperson for the applicant, spoke in support of the recommendation. Mr Ilias reconfirmed Lendlease’s ongoing work with Penrith City Council and key stakeholders to resolve any issues raised during the approval process and that they have responded to community concerns by increasing the conservation corridor. Mr Ilias noted that discussions are continuing at a senior level between Council and Lendlease to resolve a number of strategic issues. Mr Ilias concluded by stating that the opportunity exists to take an holistic approach to find a suitable outcome for Council, Lendlease and the broader community relating to community amenity and conservation outcomes.
Mr Wayne Olling
Item 6 – DA 15/1550.01 Section 96 Application for Modifications to the Subdivision Layout (Village 6), Jordan Springs Lot 1125 DP1158660 Ninth Avenue, Jordan Springs
Mr Olling, Secretary of Cumberland Conservation Network, spoke in opposition to the recommendation. Mr Olling stated that while the Conservation Network seeks conservation of the whole 23 ha of Cumberland Plain Woodland affected by the proposed development, they recognise the constraints that Penrith City Council is working within. Mr Olling expressed the Network’s appreciation of Council’s efforts in this regard, but also asked for some improvement on what has been recommended in order to achieve a viable conservation outcome.
RESUMPTION OF STANDING ORDERS |
276 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch that Standing Orders be resumed, the time being 8:16pm. |
Reports of Committees
1 Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee Meeting held on 12 August 2015 |
277 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM seconded Councillor Tricia Hitchen that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Access Committee meeting held on 12 August, 2015 be adopted. |
2 Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 31 August 2015 |
278 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 31 August, 2015 be adopted. |
3 Report and Recommendations of the Penrith Community Safety Partnership Meeting held on 2 September 2015 |
279 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Jim Aitken OAM seconded Councillor Maurice Girotto that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Penrith Community Safety Partnership meeting held on 2 September, 2015 be adopted. |
4 Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 7 September 2015 |
280 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marcus Cornish seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 7 September, 2015 be adopted. |
Procedural Motion 281 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor John Thain that consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 14 September 2015 and Item 7 - Development Application DA14/0622.02 Section 96 Modification to Approved Earthworks, Shed and Truck Parking Including Amendment of the Approved Shed Location, Shed Design, Operational Conditions of Consent and Lighting at Lot 122 DP709303 (No. 41-47) Jolly Street, Castlereagh Applicant: Ty Gosling; Owner: ~Ty and Deanne Gosling be brought forward for consideration before Item 1 and that Item 15 be considered at the conclusion of the Committee of the Whole. |
Having previously declared Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest in Item 5 of the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee held on 14 September 2015 and Item 7 of the Delivery Program Reports, Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown vacated the Chair and left the meeting, the time being 8:19pm.
The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM took the Chair, the time being 8:20pm.
5 Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 14 September 2015 (excluding Item 1) 282 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Tricia Hitchen that the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 14 September, 2015 be adopted, with the exception of Item 1. |
5 Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 14 September 2015 – Item 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
283 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Bernard Bratusa that the recommendation contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 14 September, 2015, with regard to Item 1 be adopted. An AMENDMENT was moved by Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that consideration of this matter be deferred until a works inspection has been completed.
The MOTION was PUT.
The MOTION was CARRIED and on becoming the SUBSTANTIVE MOTION was also CARRIED.
In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
Councillor Michelle Tormey left the meeting, the time being 8:40pm.
Councillor Michelle Tormey returned to the meeting, the time being 8:41pm.
DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS
OUTCOME 2 – WE PLAN FOR OUT FUTURE GROWTH
7 Development Application DA14/0622.02 Section 96 Modification to Approved Earthworks, Shed and Truck Parking Including Amendment of the Approved Shed Location, Shed Design, Operational Conditions of Consent and Lighting at Lot 122 DP709303 (No. 41-47) Jolly Street, Castlereagh Applicant: Ty Gosling; Owner: ~Ty and Deanne Gosling |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
284 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Prue Car That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA14/0622.02 Section 96 Modification to Approved Earthworks, Shed and Truck Parking Including Amendment of the Approved Shed Location, Shed Design, Operational Conditions of Consent and Lighting at Lot 122 DP709303 (No. 41-47) Jolly Street, Castlereagh be received. 2. Development Application DA14/0622.02 Section 96 Modification to Approved Earthworks, Shed and Truck Parking Including Amendment of the Approved Shed Location, Shed Design, Operational Conditions of Consent and Lighting at Lot 122 DP709303 (No. 41-47) Jolly Street, Castlereagh be refused for the following reasons:- i) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 96(1A)(a) and (b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the proposed modification is not considered to be of minimal environmental impact given the likely impact upon drainage sheet flow resulting from the relocation of the shed and fill activities and insufficient information submitted to address how drainage design measures can be implemented to manage such flows.
ii) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 96(1A)(a)and (b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the proposed amendments result in an adverse impact to the amenity of adjoining properties resulting from increased hours for servicing of the trucks, persons other than the occupants of the dwelling parking and their vehicles on site.
iii) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 96(1A)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the removal of the trial period provides on-going consent for the use without the ability to address any environmental impacts which arise during the trial period.
iv) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 96(1A) (b) and (c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the modified development is not substantially the same development as the development for which the consent was originally granted as some proposed amendments change the nature and permissibility of the storage of trucks on the site ancillary to the dwelling and renders the use prohibited within the zone.
v) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 96(1A) (b) and (c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the proposed enlargement and relocation of the shed alters the suitability and compatibility of the shed with respect to the constraints of the site and amenity of adjoining dwellings.
vi) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 96(1A) (d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as in view of the complaints received by Council in relation to the number of trucks parked on the premises, it is considered that strict compliance with the definition for garaging of plant and trucks under LEP 2014 and LEP 201 is essential in terms of permissibility and the property will not be used as a truck depot and consent for use of the shed for storage of two trucks be time limited to twelve (12) months to monitor compliance with this definition and review the impacts of the development on the surrounding area.
vii) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 96(1A)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the proposed modification is not considered to be of minimal environmental impact as it has not been demonstrated that there will be no adverse impacts upon residential amenity of adjoining properties with no details being provided on the location or intensity of lighting.
viii) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 79C(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the modification intensifies the use and alters the permissibility of the use of the premises to store trucks as ancillary to the dwelling and is not permissible in the zone and is contrary to the objectives of the zone.
ix) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) and (b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the approved shed is considered ample in size to accommodate the two trucks and other personal items. The visual and amenity impacts are considered to be compromised by the increase in size and location of the shed and are now unsuitable.
x) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 79C(1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the proposed modified development would undermine the rural residential context of the area and is not suitable for the site.
xi) The application is not satisfactory for the purpose of Section 79C(1)(c) and (d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the modified proposal would have an adverse impact upon the existing area, having regard to the submissions made, and will cause significant impact to the amenity of the residential area and is therefore not be in the public interest.
In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown returned to the meeting and re-took the Chair, the time being 8:48pm.
Outcome 1 - We can work close to home
1 Tender Reference 14/15-26 Weekly Council News Page & Quarterly Community Newsletter |
285 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marcus Cornish seconded Councillor Ben Goldfinch That: 1. The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 14/15-26 Weekly Council News Page & Quarterly Community Newsletter be received. 2. The Western Weekender be awarded the contract for both the weekly Corporate News Page and quarterly Community Newsletter a contract sum of $69,460 ex GST per year. 3. The Contract be for an initial period of two years with a one-year extension option by mutual agreement and subject to satisfactory performance. |
Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth
2 Proposed Suburb Name for the Central Precinct, St Marys ADI Site |
286 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that consideration of this matter be deferred for further investigation and discussion, with a further report to be presented to a future Ordinary meeting of Council. |
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM left the meeting, the time being 9:02pm.
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 9:04pm.
3 Planning Proposal to amend the Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 - housekeeping amendment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
287 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on Planning Proposal to amend the Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 - housekeeping amendment be received. 2. Council submit the attached Planning Proposal to amend the Penrith LEP 2010 to the NSW Minister for Planning for consideration under the Gateway process. 3. Council request delegation for the General Manager to finalise the LEP amendment. 4. Council carry out the requirements of the Gateway Determination to process the Planning Proposal, including public exhibition. 5. The north western corner of French Street Werrington that has been identified to have inconsistency between the E2 zone boundary and approvals granted due to GIS mapping error be forwarded to the Department of Planning as a section 73A amendment to the LEP urgently. 6. Council officers meet with the landowners of French Street Werrington to finalise the Environmental zone boundaries in the north eastern part of the site before the Housekeeping Planning Proposal is submitted to the Gateway for consideration. 7. The General Manager be granted delegation to make any necessary minor changes that have no policy implications to the Planning Proposal before submitting it to the Minister for Planning.
|
4 Minor Amendment to Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 to correct the property description of land at Dunheved Circuit St Marys in Schedule 4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
288 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on Minor Amendment to Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 to correct the property description of land at Dunheved Circuit St Marys in Schedule 4 be received. 2. Council resolve to prepare a LEP amendment to amend Penrith LEP 2010 in accordance with section 73A of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 to correct the error in property description in Schedule 4 Part 2 from ‘Lots 212 and 213, DP 31908’ to ‘Lots 212 and 213, DP 31909’.
In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
5 Development Application DA15/0506 Construction of a detached brick garage and concrete in-ground swimming pool Lot 233 DP 270417 (No.) 15 Pennard Cres, Luddenham Applicant: Luke Kelly; Owner: ~Luke & Christine Kelly |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
289 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Greg Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA15/0506 Construction of a detached brick garage and concrete in-ground swimming pool Lot 233 DP 270417 (No.) 15 Pennard Cres, Luddenham be received. 2. DA15/0506 for a detached brick garage with a tiled roof and in-ground swimming pool at Lot 233 DP 270417 (No.) 15 Pennard Cres, Luddenham be approved subject to the following conditions: A001 – Approved plans A008 – Works to BCA requirements A019 – Occupation Certificate A020 – Use of building A041 – Construction in Bushfire Areas (BAL 19) A046 – Obtain Construction Certificate before commencement of works D009 – Covering of waste storage area D010 – Appropriate disposal of excavated or other waste D014 – Plant & equipment noise E001 – BCA compliance F006 – Water tank and nuisance H001 – Stamped plans and erection of site notice H030 – Roof finishes (rural property) H038 – Connection of rainwater tank supply H039 – Rainwater tank pumps H041 – Hours of work J002 – Fencing when water in pool J004 – Pool fence (residential) J007 – Boundary Fencing J010 – Pool board/sign J011 - NSW Swimming Pool Register K016 – Stormwater K026 – Stabilised access K041 – Infrastructure Restoration Bond ($500.00) K Special – All excavation/cut detailed on the approved plan, located within 2.0m of the allotment boundary, shall be retained with retaining walls wholly within the property boundary. Retaining walls shall preserve and protect adjoining buildings from damage and must not impact on any adjoining building, structure or property. Retaining walls shall be completed within 6 weeks of any Occupation Certificate being issued. L008 – Tree Preservation Order P002 – Fees associated with Council land Q01F – Notice of Commencement and Appointment of PCA Q05F – Occupation Certificate 3. The restrictive covenant on the use of land numbered 5 referred to in the Section 88B Instrument of the Conveyancing Act 1919 applying to Lot 233 in DP 270417 (known as No. 15) Pennard Crescent, Luddenham be varied to allow the in-ground swimming pool to be located partially outside the area labelled (BE) on the abovementioned plan in accordance with the approved site plan. 4. The Common Seal of Penrith City Council be affixed to all necessary documentation to vary/release the covenant.
In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
6 Development Application DA14/1550.01 Section 96 Application for Modifications to the Subdivision Layout (Village 6), Jordan Springs Lot 1125 DP1158660 Ninth Avenue, Jordan Springs Applicant: Maryland Development Company Pty Ltd; Owner: ~St Marys Land Limited |
||||||||||||||||||||||
290 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA14/1550.01 Section 96 Application for Modifications to the Subdivision Layout (Village 6), Jordan Springs Lot 1125 DP1158660 Ninth Avenue, Jordan Springs be received. 2. Council form the opinion that the subject modified application does not have a ‘significant effect’ on threatened species, population or an ecological community as outlined within the body of this report. 3. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA14/1550.01 Section 96 Application for Modifications to the Subdivision Layout (Village 6), Jordan Springs Lot 1125 DP1158660 Ninth Avenue, Jordan Springs be determined by granting a consent in accordance with Section 80(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 subject to the following amended conditions. Standard Conditions
A001 – Amended to reflect the amended plans of subdivision and supporting documentation.
Special Conditions
Condition No. 4 be deleted and replaced as follows:-
The intent of measures is to provide sufficient space and maintain reduced fuel loads so as to ensure radiant heat levels of buildings are below critical limits and to prevent direct flame contact with a building. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:
a) A 10 metre wide inner protection area (IPA) shall be provided within Lot 6011 along its eastern boundary. In accordance with section 88B of the 'Conveyancing Act 1919' a restriction to the land use shall be placed on this lot requiring the provision of this IPA which shall be maintained as outlined within section 4.1.3 and Appendix 5 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006' and the NSW Rural Fire Service's document 'Standards for asset protection zones'
b) A 15 metre wide inner protection area (IPA) shall be provided in Lot 6013 along its western boundary. In accordance with section 88B of the ‘Conveyancing Act 1919' a restriction to the land use shall be placed on these lots requiring the provision of this IPA which shall be maintained as outlined within section 4.1.3 and Appendix 5 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006' and the NSW Rural Fire Service's document 'Standards for asset protection zones'.
Condition No. 9 be deleted and replaced as follows:-
a) Water, electricity and gas are to comply with section 4.1.3 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'. b) Public road access shall comply with section 4.1.3 (1) of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'. c) Fire trails shall comply with section 4.1.3 (3) of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'. d) A 2.1 metre high non-combustible radiant heat shield shall be provided along the northern boundary of proposed lots 6011 to 6019. e) General Advice - This approval is for the subdivision of the land only. Any further development application for class 1,2 & 3 buildings as identified by the 'Building Code of Australia' must be subject to separate application under section 79BA of the EP & A Act and address the requirements of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'.
The development proposal is to comply with the subdivision layout identified on the drawing prepared by RPS Australia numbered D646-S6-002Pr.dwg Issue R, dated 9 September 2015.
Condition No. 11 be deleted.
Condition No. 12 be deleted.
Additional condition to be added.
Prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate, a detailed Vegetation Management Plan for the short and long term management of the Biodiversity Corridor is to be submitted to Penrith City Council for approval. If Council is not the certifying authority, a copy of Council’s approval for the Vegetation Management Plan is to be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan is to include the following:
a) Is consistent with relevant environmental legislation and policies, including, but not limited to, the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995, the Noxious Weeds Act 1993 the Water Management Act 2002, the Rural Fires Act 1997 as well as the federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, and guidelines such as the Rural Fire Services Planning for Bushfire Protection 2006 and Recovering Bushland on the Cumberland Plain: Best practice guidelines for the management and restoration of bushland (DEC, 2005). b) A detailed plan that clearly outlines how vegetation should be protected and managed during construction of proposed future development and the ongoing future management of the vegetation and any identified threatened species over the next 3 years, as well as in the longer term. The focus is to be on best practice bush regeneration methods and habitat improvement. c) The VMP is to identify potential future impacts on the vegetation from the development and road, including access, weed encroachment, pest animals, stormwater etc, and is to outline how these impacts will be managed in the long term. d) The VMP is to include specifications for the management and maintenance of the APZ areas on each side of the Biodiversity Corridor. e) Project tasks should be defined and described, including a schedule detailing the sequence and duration of works necessary for the implementation of the VMP. f) Costings for the implementation of all components and stages of the work including materials, labour, watering, maintenance, monitoring and reporting should be included. g) Processes for monitoring and review, including a method of performance evaluation should be identified. This should include replacing plant losses, addressing deficiencies, problems, climatic conditions and successful completion of works.
All activities on site are to be implemented and carried out in accordance with the plan. Council may request a review and if necessary updating of the plan to reflect current environmental standards and site conditions. Council must be satisfied with any changes prior to the amendment of the plan.
4. Those who made a submission be advised of Council’s decision.
5. Lots 6011 and 6013-6019 be deferred from this report for further investigation.
In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
Councillor John Thain left the meeting, the time being 9:21pm.
Councillor John Thain returned to the meeting, the time being 9:24pm.
Councillor Maurice Girotto left the meeting, the time being 9:27pm.
Councillor Maurice Girotto returned to the meeting, the time being 9:29pm.
8 Development Application DA15/0800 for a Torrens Title Subdivision of 3 lots into 2 lots at Lots 75 and 76 Section G DP 1613 and Lot 6 DP 739547, No. 3 Horace Street Cranebrook Applicant: Penrith City Council; Owner: ~Penrith City Council |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
291 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Bernard Bratusa seconded Tricia Hitchen That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA15/0800 for a Torrens Title Subdivision of 3 lots into 2 lots at Lots 75 and 76 Section G DP 1613 and Lot 6 DP 739547, No. 3 Horace Street Cranebrook be received. 2. The proposed variation to minimum allotment width, pursued under the provisions of Clause 4.6 of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 be supported. 3. Development Application DA15/0800 for a Torrens Title Subdivision of 3 lots into 2 lots at Lots 75 and 76 Section G DP 1613 and Lot 6 DP 739547, No. 3 Horace Street Cranebrook be approved subject to the following conditions:
A001 – Approved Plans The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the following stamped approved plans, the application form and any supporting information issued by Penrith City Council, except as may be amended in red on the attached plans and by the following conditions.
D002 – Spraygrass All land that has been disturbed by earthworks is to be spray grassed or similarly treated to establish a grass cover. D005 – No filling without prior approval No fill material is to be imported to the site without the prior approval of Penrith City Council in accordance with Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No.20 (Hawkesbury- Nepean River) (No.2-1997). No recycling of material for use as fill material shall be carried out on the site without the prior approval of Council. D009 – Covering of waste storage area All waste materials stored on-site are to be contained within a designated area such as a waste bay or bin to ensure that no waste materials are allowed to enter the stormwater system or neighbouring properties. The designated waste storage areas shall provide at least two waste bays / bins so as to allow for the separation of wastes, and are to be fully enclosed when the site is unattended. D026 – Liquid waste Only clean and unpolluted water is to be discharged into Penrith City Council's stormwater drainage system. Liquid wastes suitable for discharge to the mains sewer are to be discharged in accordance with Sydney Water requirements. If mains sewer is not available or if Sydney Water will not allow disposal to the sewer then a licensed waste contractor is to remove the liquid waste from the premises to an appropriate waste facility. The waste contractor and waste facility are to hold the relevant licenses issued by the NSW Environment Protection Authority. D Special - Mud Mud and soil from vehicular movements to and from the site must not be deposited on the road. D Special - Dust Suppression Dust suppression techniques are to be employed during construction to reduce any potential nuisances to surrounding properties. G001 – Installation of services and service clearances (subdivision) All services (water, sewer, electricity, telephone and gas) are to be installed within the proposed public roads before final inspection of the engineering works. Prior to the release of the linen plan, the following service authority clearances shall be obtained: · a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994 shall be obtained from Sydney Water. This is required prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate and · a letter from Integral Energy stating that satisfactory arrangements have been made for electricity supply to all proposed allotments in the subdivision, including any necessary easements; and · a letter from an approved telecommunications service provider that satisfactory arrangements have been made for underground telephone services to all proposed allotments in the subdivision, including any necessary easements. These clearances are to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. H001 – Stamped Plans and erection of site notice Stamped plans, specifications, a copy of the development consent, the Construction Certificate and any other Certificates to be relied upon shall be available on site at all times during construction. The following details are to be displayed in a maximum of 2 signs to be erected on the site: · the name of the Principal Certifying Authority, their address and telephone number, · the name of the person in charge of the work site and telephone number at which that person may be contacted during work hours, · that unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited, · the designated waste storage area must be covered when the site is unattended, and · all sediment and erosion control measures shall be fully maintained until completion of the construction phase. Signage but no more than 2 signs stating the above details is to be erected: · at the commencement of, and for the full length of the, construction works onsite, and · in a prominent position on the work site and in a manner that can be easily read by pedestrian traffic. All construction signage is to be removed when the Occupation Certificate has been issued for the development. H006 – Submission of and implement waste management plan A completed waste management plan shall be submitted to Penrith City Council for consideration and approval. Council must approve the plan before a Construction Certificate can be issued for the approved development. The waste management plan shall be prepared in accordance with the Waste Planning Development Control Plan (2004), and shall address all waste materials likely to result from the proposed development, with details of the estimated waste volumes, onsite storage and management, proposed re-use of materials, designated waste contractors, recycling outlet and / or landfill site. The approved waste management plan must be implemented on-site and adhered to throughout all stages of the development including demolition, with supporting documentation / receipts retained in order to verify the recycling and disposal of materials in accordance with the approved plan. H041 – Hours of work Construction works or subdivision works that are carried out in accordance with an approved consent that involve the use of heavy vehicles, heavy machinery and other equipment likely to cause offence to adjoining properties shall be restricted to the following hours in accordance with the NSW Environment Protection Authority Noise Control Guidelines: · Mondays to Fridays, 7am to 6pm · Saturdays, 7am to 1pm if inaudible on neighbouring residential premises, otherwise 8am to 1pm · No work is permitted on Sundays and Public Holidays. Other construction works carried out inside a
building/tenancy and do not involve the use of equipment that emits noise are
not restricted to the construction hours stated above. K101 – Works at no cost to Council All roadworks, drainage works and dedications, required to effect the consented development shall be undertaken at no cost to Penrith City Council. K 201 - Sediment & Erosion Control CC approval Any Construction Certificate issued by the Principal Certifying Authority or certifying Authority shall incorporate plans and details for erosion and sediment control in accordance with the Department of Housing’s “Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction” 2004. K202 – Roads Act Minor roadworks Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate a Roads Act application, including payment of application and inspection fees shall be lodged with Penrith City Council, as the Roads Authority, for the following works: a) Provision of a vehicular crossing/s. b) Provision of private drainage connections to Council’s road drainage system. c) Opening the road reserve for the provision of services including stormwater. d) Placing of hoardings, containers, waste skips, etc. in the road reserve. K205 - Construction Certificate for Subdivision Works Subdivision works shall be provided generally in accordance with the concept plan/s lodged for development approval, prepared by J. Wyndham Prince, reference number 110182/CC001, revision A, dated 7 July 2015. Any Construction Certificate/s issued by the Certifying Authority shall include but not be limited to the following subdivision works. a) Roads and drainage b) Stormwater drainage c) Interallotment drainage. Engineering plans, supporting calculations and relevant certification for the subdivision works shall be prepared by suitably qualified people and must accompany the application for a Construction Certificate. Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority shall ensure that the subdivision works have been designed in accordance with Penrith City Council’s Design Guidelines and Construction Specification for Civil Works. K501A – Completion of subdivision works Prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall ensure that all subdivision works required by this consent have been satisfactorily completed or that suitable arrangements have been made with Penrith City Council for any outstanding works.
K514 – Subdivision compliance documentation Prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate, the following compliance documentation shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. A copy of the following documentation shall be provided to Council where Council is not the Principal Certifying Authority: a) Work as Executed (WAE) drawings of all civil works. The WAE drawings shall be marked in red on copies of the stamped Construction Certificate drawings signed, certified and dated by a registered surveyor or the design engineer. The Work as Executed drawings shall be prepared in accordance with Council’s Engineering Construction Specification for Civil Works. b) CCTV footage in DVD format to Council’s requirements and a report in “SEWRAT” format for all drainage within future public roads and public land. Any damage that is identified is to be rectified in consultation with Penrith City Council. c) Surveyor’s Certificate certifying that all pipes and services are located wholly within the property or within appropriate easements and that no services encroach boundaries. · Compaction reports for road pavement construction · Compaction reports for bulk earthworks and lot regrading. · Soil classification for all residential lots · Statement of Compliance M001 – Prior to subdivision work Work on the subdivision is not to commence until: · a Construction Certificate has been issued, · a Principal Certifying Authority has been appointed for the project, and · any other matters prescribed in the development consent for the subdivision and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act and Regulation have been complied with. Penrith City Council is to be notified 48 hours prior to commencement of engineering works or clearing associated with the subdivision. M008 – Linen Plan Submission of the original Linen Plan and ten (10) copies.
· The location of all buildings and/or other permanent improvements shall comply with any statutory boundary clearances or setbacks as defined by the Building Code of Australia and Council’s resolutions. · All existing services are wholly contained within the lot served and/or covered by an appropriate easement.
Q01F – Notice of Commencement & Appointment of PCA Prior to the commencement of any earthworks or construction works on site, the proponent is to: (a) employ a Principal Certifying Authority to oversee that the said works carried out on the site are in accordance with the development consent and related Construction Certificate issued for the approved development, and with the relevant provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act and accompanying Regulation, and (b) submit a Notice of Commencement to Penrith City Council. The Principal Certifying Authority shall submit to Council an “Appointment of Principal Certifying Authority” in accordance with Section 81A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Information to accompany the Notice of Commencement Two (2) days before any earthworks or construction/demolition works are to commence on site (including the clearing site vegetation), the proponent shall submit a “Notice of Commencement” to Council in accordance with Section 81A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Q008 – Subdivision Certificate A Subdivision Certificate is to be obtained prior to the release of the linen plan of subdivision. The Subdivision Certificate will not be issued if any of the conditions in this consent are outstanding. In accordance with Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993, a DIVISION was then called with the following result:
|
9 Greater Sydney Commission |
292 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Greg Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Greater Sydney Commission be received. 2. Council nominate Councillor Ross Fowler OAM to participate on the selection panel for the West District Commissioner. |
Outcome 3 - We can get around the City
10 Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) 2015/16 Road Funding Grants |
293 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Prue Car seconded Councillor Greg Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) 2015/16 Road Funding Grants be received. 2. The RMS 2015/16 Program Funding Block Grant of $1,108,000 be accepted. 3. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be affixed to the “Agreement for Block Grant Assistance to Council for Regional Roads 2015/16”. |
Having previously declared a Non Pecuniary Conflict of Interest – Less than Significant in Item 11, Councillor Tricia Hitchen left the meeting, the time being 9:39pm.
11 Tender Reference RFT 15/16-03 Concrete Maintenance Works: Footpath and Kerb and Gutter |
294 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on Tender Reference RFT 15/16-03 Concrete Maintenance Works: Footpath and Kerb and Gutter be received. 2. Del Rocchio Concreting Pty Ltd be appointed as the preferred contractor for the Concrete Maintenance Works: Footpath and Kerb and Gutter for a period of three (3) years with an option to extend for a further two (2) by one (1) year periods, by mutual agreement and subject to satisfactory performance, allowing for rise and fall provisions. 3. Mack Civil Pty Ltd be appointed as the secondary contractor, to be engaged when the preferred contractor is unavailable to provide the service.
4. Kelbon Project Services Pty Ltd be appointed as the third ranked contractor, to be engaged when the secondary contractor is unavailable to provide the service.
5. Devcon Civil Pty Ltd be appointed as the fourth ranked contractor, to be engaged when the third ranked contractor is unavailable to provide the service.
6. Enwon (Australia) Pty Ltd be appointed as the preferred contractor for machine moulded kerb only. |
Councillor Tricia Hitchen returned to the meeting, the time being 9:40pm.
Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places
12 Charity Clothing Bins Councillor Marcus Cornish left the meeting, the time being 9:41pm. Councillor Marcus Cornish returned to the meeting, the time
being 9:42pm. |
295 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on Charity Clothing Bins be received. 2. Council adopts the Charity Clothing Bins policy provided as Appendix 1 to this report 3. Council write to the organisations mentioned in the report, thanking them for their submissions and advising them of the adoption of the Charity Clothing Bin policy. 4. The policy incorporate a clause which stipulates a minimum size for notices that are required by the policy to be placed on Charity Bins. 5. The policy incorporate a requirement for bins to be of an appropriate height and condition to allow proper use and that details of Council’s existing waste collection options be provided. |
13 Tender Reference 15/16-05 Construction of Sportsfield & Associated Infrastructure for Glenmore Park Sportsfield Stage 2, Parkway Avenue Glenmore Park |
296 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Bernard Bratusa seconded Councillor Marcus Cornish that consideration of this matter be deferred to a Councillor Briefing. |
14 Maintenance of Playgrounds and Parks |
297 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the information contained in the report on Maintenance of Playgrounds and Parks be received. |
Outcome 5 - We care about our environment
16 56th Annual Floodplain Management Australia Conference - Tuesday 17 to Friday 20 May 2016 |
298 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM That: 1. The information contained in the report on 56th Annual Floodplain Management Australia Conference - Tuesday 17 to Friday 20 May 2016 be received. 2. Council nominate Councillors Kevin Crameri OAM, Jackie Greenow OAM, Jim Aitken OAM and any other interested Councillors as its delegates to the 2016 Floodplain Management Australia Conference and Workshops to be held in Nowra from Tuesday 17 May to Friday 20 May 2016 and grant of leave absence as appropriate. |
Outcome 6 - We're healthy and share strong community spirit
17 NSW Family and Community Services Targeted Earlier Intervention Programs - Sector Consultation Paper |
299 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Tricia Hitchen seconded Councillor Greg Davies That: 1. The information contained in the report on NSW Family and Community Services Targeted Earlier Intervention Programs - Sector Consultation Paper be received. 2. Council endorse the submission to the NSW Department of Family and Community Services on the Sector Consultation Paper as outlined in this report. |
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
18 Licence Agreement over Part 384-386 Mulgoa Road, Glenmore Park to Penrith City Council |
300 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Bernard Bratusa That: 1. The information contained in the report on Licence Agreement over Part 384-386 Mulgoa Road, Glenmore Park to Penrith City Council be received. 2. Council enter into a 2 year licence agreement with Mark E Jardine and Lisa M Smith in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in this report. 3. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all necessary documentation. |
19 Audit Committee |
301 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Bernard Bratusa That: 1. The information contained in the report on Audit Committee be received. 2. Frank Gelonesi, Darren Greentree and Jayant Gulwadi be reappointed to the Audit Committee for a term of 2 years. |
20 2015-16 Financial Assistance Grant |
302 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Bernard Bratusa That: 1. The information contained in the report on 2015-16 Financial Assistance Grant be received. 2. The budget be adjusted to reflect the revised Financial Assistance Grant as part of the September Quarterly Review. |
23 Summary of Investments & Banking for the period 1 August 2015 to 31 August 2015 |
303 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Bernard Bratusa That: 1. The information contained in the report on Summary of Investments & Banking for the period 1 August 2015 to 31 August 2015 be received. 2. The Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer and Summaries of Investments and Performance for the period 1 August 2015 to 31 August 2015 be noted and accepted. 3. The graphical investment analysis as at 31 August 2015 be noted. |
21 Penrith Business Alliance Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM left the meeting, the time being 9:56pm. Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 9:58pm. Councillor Ben Goldfinch left the meeting at 9:58pm and did not return. Councillor Prue Car MP left the meeting, the time being 9:58pm. Councillor Prue Car MP returned to the meeting, the time being 9:59pm. |
304 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the information contained in the report on Penrith Business Alliance be received. |
22 Outcome of Land and Environment Court Appeal - Penrith Lakes Development Corporation v Penrith City Council |
305 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor Tricia Hitchen that the information contained in the report on Outcome of Land and Environment Court Appeal - Penrith Lakes Development Corporation v Penrith City Council be received. |
REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS and URGENT BUSINESS
UB 1 Personal Matter - Compliance Matters, Castlereagh |
Councillor Prue Car MP requested that a matter concerning compliance for a local resident be referred to Committee of the Whole for discussion as it refers to the personal hardship of a resident or ratepayer and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest. |
UB 2 Sydney Thunder Men's and Women's Big Bash League |
Councillor Greg Davies requested that an amount of $10,000 be allocated equally from each Ward’s voted works to sponsor the first year of the Sydney Thunder Men’s and Women’s Big Bash League subject to a letter advising of the success in stipulating that the words ‘New West’ be included on all promotional material for the local games, with a report to be presented to Council on the further sponsorship for the next 2 years of the 3 year sponsorship. |
306 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor John Thain that the matter be brought forward as a matter of urgency.
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
|
307 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Greg Davies seconded Councillor John Thain that an amount of $10,000 be allocated equally from each Ward’s voted works to sponsor the first year of the Sydney Thunder Men’s and Women’s Big Bash League subject to a letter advising of the success in stipulating that the words ‘New West’ be included on all promotional material for the local games, with a report to be presented to Council on the further sponsorship for the next 2 years of the 3 year sponsorship. |
Councillor Greg Davies left the meeting, the time being 10:20pm.
Councillor Greg Davies returned to the meeting, the time being 10:24pm
UB 3 Commercial Matter - French Street, Werrington |
Councillor John Thain requested that a matter regarding a development at French Street, Werrington be referred to Committee of the Whole for discussion as it refers to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest. |
RR 1 Mr Alan Travers - Sponsorship of Honoured Citizen |
Councillor John Thain requested a report to Council on the sponsorship of Mr Alan Travers, former General Manager of Penrith City Council, as an Honoured Citizen. |
Councillors John Thain and Jackie Greenow OAM left the
meeting, the time being 10:23pm.
Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM returned to the meeting, the time being 10:24pm.
Councillor John Thain returned to the meeting, the time being 10:25pm.
UB 4 Solar Car Race |
Councillor Ross Fowler OAM requested that an amount of $5,000 be allocated equally from each Ward’s voted works to sponsor the Solar Car Race. |
308 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that the matter be brought forward as a matter of urgency.
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown, ruled
that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting. |
309 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Jim Aitken OAM that an amount of $5,000 be allocated equally from each Ward’s voted works to sponsor the Solar Car Race. |
UB 5 Request for Leave of Absence |
Councillor Michelle Tormey requested Leave of Absence from 6 October 2015 to 9 October 2015 inclusive. |
310 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Michelle Tormey seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM that the matter be brought forward as a matter of urgency.
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
|
311 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Michelle Tormey seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM that Leave of Absence be granted to Councillor Michelle Tormey from 6 October 2015 to 9 October 2015 inclusive. |
RR 2 Performance of La Boheme at Joan Sutherland Performing Arts Centre |
Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM requested that congratulations be conveyed to principal signer Lorenzo Rositano on the success of the opera La Boheme which was performed at the Joan Sutherland Performing Arts Centre on Friday 25 September 2015, and expressed the hope that these events continue to be held at the Joan. |
UB 6 Legal Matter - Trading of a Local Proprietor |
Councillor Maurice Girotto requested that a matter concerning the operations of a local proprietor be referred to Committee of the Whole for discussion as it refers to information that would, if disclosed, prejudice the maintenance of law and discussion of the matter would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest. |
RR 3 Sale of Poles and Wires |
Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM requested that Council write to the State Government requesting information as to what will happen to the $2.7B that will be derived from the sale of poles and wires. |
RR 4 Emu Plains Cemetery |
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM requested a report to Council concerning the possibility of building a columbarium at Emu Plains Cemetery as a matter of urgency. |
RR 5 Travelling Times on Local Roads |
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM requested that the Local Traffic Committee provide information on the travelling times on the following roads into Penrith on week days at 8:00am and 9:00am, and on Saturdays at 9:00am:
|
RR 6 Roadworks - Carolyn Chase, Orchard Hills |
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM requested that the provision of roadworks in front of 70 Carolyn Chase, Orchard Hills be investigated as a result of removal of a tree which has damaged the road surface. |
UB 7 Penrith Netball Premier League Team |
Councillor Bernard Bratusa requested that an amount of $15,000 be equally allocated from each Ward’s voted works to sponsor the Penrith Netball Premier League Team for 2016. |
312 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Bernard Bratusa seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that the matter be brought forward as a matter of urgency.
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
|
313 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Bernard Bratusa seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM that an amount of $15,000 be equally allocated from each Ward’s voted works to sponsor the Penrith Netball Premier League Team for 2016. |
Committee of the Whole
314 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor Marcus Cornish seconded Councillor Greg Davies that the meeting adjourn to the Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters, the time being 10:30pm.
1 Presence of the Public
CW1 RESOLVED on the motion of Councillor Marcus Cornish seconded Councillor Greg Davies that the press and public be excluded from Committee of the Whole to deal with the following matters:
Outcome 1
2 Property Matter - 21 - 25 Woodriff Street, Penrith
This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Outcome 7
3 Property Matter - 154 Henry Street (Welsh Place carpark)
This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to personnel matters concerning particular individuals; AND information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret; AND advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
4 Approval to commence EOI process for the sale or development of Council owned property, 229 Victoria Street, Werrington
This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Outcome 1
5 Proposed Expressions of Interest over Council-owned land in Penrith CBD
This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Outcome 2
6 Compliance Matters at 36 Fourth Road, Berkshire Park
This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Outcome 4
7 Cemeteries - Grave Digging Tender RFT 14/15 - 31
This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as the report refers to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
Additional Matters
8 Personal Matter – Compliance Matters, Castlereagh
This matter has been referred to Committee of the Whole as it refers to the personal hardship of a resident or ratepayer and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
9 Commercial Matter – French Street, Werrington
This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as it refers to
commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret and discussion of the matter in open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
10 Legal Matter – Trading of a Local Proprietor
This item has been referred to Committee of the Whole as it refers to information that would, if disclosed, prejudice the maintenance of law and discussion of the matter would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
The meeting resumed at 10:57pm and the General Manager reported that the Committee of the Whole met at 10:30pm on 28 September 2015, the following being present
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown, Deputy Mayor Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, and Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Bernard Bratusa, Prue Car MP, Kevin Crameri OAM, Greg Davies, Maurice Girotto, Jackie Greenow OAM, Tricia Hitchen, John Thain and Michelle Tormey.
and the Committee of the Whole excluded the press and public from the meeting for the reasons set out in CW1 and that the Committee of the Whole submitted the following recommendations to Council.
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
2 Property Matter - 21 - 25 Woodriff Street, Penrith Councillors Marcus Cornish and Michelle Tormey left the meeting, the time being 10:30 pm. |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM CW2 That: 1. The information contained in the report on Property Matter - 21 - 25 Woodriff Street, Penrith be received. 2. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all necessary documentation. 3. The General Manager be authorised to enter into the Put and Call Option Agreement, Buy Back Deed and Deed as to Use as detailed within the report. |
3 Property Matter - 154 Henry Street (Welsh Place carpark) |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Ross Fowler OAM seconded Councillor Greg Davies CW3 That: 1. The information contained in the report on Property Matter - 154 Henry Street (Welsh Place carpark) be received. 2. Council agree to commercial terms as outlined within this report. 3. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all documentation if necessary. |
4 Approval to commence EOI process for the sale or development of Council owned property, 229 Victoria Street, Werrington Councillor Michelle Tormey returned to the meeting, the time being 10:36pm. |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Prue Car MP CW4 That: 1. The information contained in the report on Approval to commence EOI process for the sale or development of Council owned property, 229 Victoria Street, Werrington be received 2. Council commences an EOI process consistent with this report. |
5 Proposed Expressions of Interest over Council-owned land in Penrith CBD |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Maurice Girotto CW5 That: 1. The information contained in the report on Proposed Expressions of Interest over Council-owned land in Penrith CBD be received. 2. EOI documents be prepared based on the objectives and principles contained in this report. 3. Council allocate $180,000 from the Property Development Reserve for the EOI process. 4. A further report be provided to Council at the conclusion of the EOI process. |
6 Compliance Matters at 36 Fourth Road, Berkshire Park |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM seconded Councillor Ross Fowler OAM CW6 That: 1. The information contained in the report on Compliance Matters at 36 Fourth Road, Berkshire Park be received. 2. Council endorse the resolution of the matter on the terms contained in the body of the report. |
7 Cemeteries - Grave Digging Tender RFT 14/15 - 31 |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Greg Davies CW7 That the information contained in the report on Cemeteries - Grave Digging Tender RFT 14/15 - 31 be received. |
8 Personal Matter - Compliance Matter, Castlereagh |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTION of Councillor Prue Car seconded Councillor Greg Davies CW8 That the information on Personal Matter – Compliance Matter, Castlereagh be received. |
9 Commercial Matter - French Street, Werrington |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTON of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Greg Davies CW9 That the information on Commercial Matter – French Street, Castlereagh be received. |
10 Legal Matter - Trading of a Local Proprietor |
RECOMMENDED on the MOTON of Councillor Maurice Girotto seconded Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM CW10 That the information on Legal Matter – Trading of a Local Proprietor be received. |
ADOPTION OF Committee of the Whole
315 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM that the recommendations contained in the Committee of the Whole and shown as CW1, CW2, CW3, CW4, CW5, CW6, CW7, CW8, CW9 and CW10 be adopted.
Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places
15 Tender Reference RFT 14/15-31 Provision of Gravedigging Services |
316 RESOLVED on the MOTION of Councillor John Thain seconded Councillor Tricia Hitchen That: 1. The information contained in the report on Tender Reference RFT 14/15-31 Provision of Gravedigging Services be received. 2. The tender from L J Follington Pty Ltd be accepted for the provision of Grave Digging Services for a three (3) year period, with an option to extend for a further two (2) one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory performance and mutual agreement and allowing for rise and fall. 3. The common seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all documentation if required. Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM requested that his name be
recorded as having voted against the MOTION. |
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 11:00pm.
Procedure for Addressing Meetings
Anyone can request permission to address a meeting, providing that the number of speakers is limited to three in support of any proposal and three against.
Any request about an issue or matter on the Agenda for the meeting can be lodged with the General Manager or Public Officer up until 12 noon on the day of the meeting.
Prior to the meeting the person who has requested permission to address the meeting will need to provide the Public Officer with a written statement of the points to be covered during the address in sufficient detail so as to inform the Councillors of the substance of the address and a written copy of any questions to be asked of the Council in order that responses to those questions can be provided in due course.
In addition, prior to addressing the meeting a person addressing Council or Committee will be informed that they do not enjoy any privilege and that permission to speak may be withdrawn should they make inappropriate comments.
It should be noted that persons who wish to address the Council are addressing a formal part of the Council Meeting. All persons addressing the Meeting should give consideration to their dress attire. Smart casual is a minimum that is thought to be appropriate when addressing such a forum.
It should be noted that speakers at meetings of the Council or Committee do not have absolute privilege (parliamentary privilege). A speaker who makes any potentially offensive or defamatory remarks about any other person may render themselves open to legal action.
Prior to addressing the meeting the person will be required to sign the following statement:
“I (name) understand that the meeting I intend to address on (date) is a public meeting. I also understand that should I say or present any material that is inappropriate, I may be subject to legal action. I also acknowledge that I have been informed to obtain my own legal advice about the appropriateness of the material that I intend to present at the above mentioned meeting”.
Should a person fail to sign the above statement then permission to address either the Council or Committee will not be granted.
The Public Officer or Minute Clerk will speak to those people who have requested permission to address the meeting, prior to the meeting at 7.15pm.
It is up to the Council or Committee to decide if the request to address the meeting will be granted.
Where permission is to be granted the Council or Committee, at the appropriate time, will suspend only so much of the Standing Orders to allow the address to occur.
The Chairperson will then call the person up to the lectern or speaking area.
The person addressing the meeting needs to clearly indicate:
· Their name;
· Organisation or group they are representing (if applicable);
· Details of the issue to be addressed and the item number of the report in the Business Paper;
· Whether they are opposing or supporting the issue or matter (if applicable) and the action they would like the meeting to take;
· The interest of the speaker (e.g. affected person, neighbour, applicant, applicants spokesperson, interested citizen etc).
Each person then has five minutes to make their address. Those addressing Council will be required to speak to the written statement they have submitted. Permission to address Council is not to be taken as an opportunity to refute or otherwise the points made by previous speakers on the same issue.
The Council or Committee can extend this time if they consider if appropriate, however, everyone needs to work on the basis that the address will be for five minutes only.
Councillors may have questions about the address so people are asked to remain at the lectern or in the speaking area until the Chairperson has thanked them.
When this occurs, they should then return to their seat.
Glenn McCarthy
Public Officer
02 4732 7649
Mayoral Minutes
Item Page
1 Recognition for Penrith Councillors 1
2 2015 Risk Management Excellence Awards 3
3 The Passing of Harry Morfoot 4
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
Recognition for Penrith Councillors
Strategy: Demonstrate transparency and ethical behaviour
Deputy Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM was recently awarded the honorary title of Emeritus Mayor at the Local Government NSW Conference held at Rosehill Gardens. Emeritus Mayor is an honour given to Councillors who have served a minimum of three one-year terms as Mayor.
Councillor Fowler was first elected to Council in 1991 as a South Ward Councillor and served the city as Mayor in 1995-1996 and again from 2013-2015. Cr Fowler is a third generation Local Government representative, following in the footsteps of his late father Bernie, a former Alderman and Mayor of Penrith City and grandfather John, who was an Alderman on the Mulgoa Municipal Council. Cr Fowler continues to represent and lead the city as the Deputy Mayor today and in his many other capacities as Chairman of Westpool and on boards and committees such as the Whitewater Stadium and the Penrith Children’s Services Cooperative.
Emeritus Mayor Councillor Greg Davies, Councillor Jim Aitken OAM and Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM have received Long Service Awards from Local Government NSW. This recognises 20 years’ service to Local Government, acknowledging their commitment and the contribution they have made, and continue to make, to the City of Penrith.
Councillor Davies joined Council as an East Ward Councillor in 1995 and has served three terms as Mayor and three terms as Deputy Mayor. He has represented Council on various boards and committees including as chairman of the Penrith Valley Community Safety Partnership, the Board for the Ripples Aquatic Centre and Whitewater Stadium.
Councillor Greenow was elected to Council in 1995 and has served one term as Mayor and six terms as Deputy Mayor. She has been actively involved in a number of committees including as the chairperson of the Penrith International Friendship Committee, the Access Committee and the Heritage Advisory Committee. Councillor Greenow received the Medal of the Order of Australia in 2013 for her “service to local government and the community, particularly those people with disabilities.”
Councillor Aitken was also elected to Council in 1995 and has served one term as Mayor and two terms as Deputy Mayor. He has represented Council on a range of Boards and Committees including Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (WSROC) and is a Director on a number of Boards including Penrith Whitewater Stadium. He received the Medal of the Order of Australia in 1998 for his “service to the community of the Penrith district.”
I would like to congratulate Councillors Aitken, Davies, Fowler and Greenow on their awards and add our appreciation for their outstanding contribution, service and dedication to the City of Penrith and its community.
Councillor Karen McKeown
Mayor
That the Mayoral Minute on Recognition for Penrith Councillors be received.
|
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
2015 Risk Management Excellence Awards
Strategy: Demonstrate transparency and ethical behaviour
Penrith City Council has been acknowledged for its risk management activities winning the 2015 United Independent Pools (UIP) Risk Management Excellence Award, sponsored by Willis Australia, and the UIP Members Choice Risk Management Award.
Westpool and UIP have a long term view of the advantages of pooling and seek to benefit through excellent Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and prudent financial strategies. UIP’s objectives include reducing insurance costs through economies of scale and improved proactive and reactive claims management; promoting Enterprise Risk Management; promoting the benefits of strategic alliances and mutual support; and providing a forum for exchange of information, ideas and resources for the benefit of members.
Westpool and UIP continually encourage members to improve, innovate and exchange ERM practices to strengthen the strategic alliance and improvements and innovation are recognised through annual Risk Management Excellence Awards.
Penrith City Council has been a leader in risk management winning eight awards over the past 14 years. Council’s risk management culture continues to strengthen as demonstrated by the quality of the previous submissions and recognition of our commitment.
Council’s winning submission was its Emerging Professional Indemnity Exposure (EPIX) website. The EPIX network was formed by Council to increase awareness of current and emerging professional indemnity exposures with a view to improving collaboration and information sharing between all members of UIP. Outcomes of the EPIX network collaboration include improved productivity, a reduction in costly insurance claims, greater efficiency through common practices and improved cost effective service to the community. The EPIX website facilitates the exchange of information and collaboration between members to proactively manage Professional Indemnity issues and reduce the frequency and potential cost of claims.
The EPIX website is leading to the further strengthening of the UIP strategic alliance.
I would like to acknowledge Ken Muir – Risk Management Coordinator, Kaye-Anne Goodshaw – Insurance Officer, Colin Wood – Building Approvals Coordinator, Michael Rudd – Services Development Officer who contributed to winning this award.
Councillor Karen McKeown
Mayor
That the Mayoral Minute on 2015 Risk Management Excellence Awards be received.
|
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
The Passing of Harry Morfoot
It is with great sadness that I note the passing of Harry Morfoot aged 78.
Mr Morfoot was a well-known Glenmore Park resident. In 2002 he helped establish the Penrith City Sub-branch of the National Serviceman’s Association of Australia, or “Nashos” as they are affectionately known.
A former national serviceman himself, he was dedicated to the welfare of other Nashos and their families in our community.
With his sub-branch colleagues he raised funds for a range of charities including the Cancer Council, Salvation Army, St John Ambulance and the RSL DefenceCare and supported the Army, Navy and Air Force Cadets.
In 2015 he received a NSW Seniors Week Local Achievement Award for the Mulgoa Electorate in recognition of his voluntary work with the Penrith City Sub-branch.
Mr Morfoot spent 30 years in the NSW Police Force, retiring in 1989 as a Senior Sergeant. After his death on October 5 he was posthumously awarded a National Police Medal for his meritorious service to NSW Police.
I’d like to acknowledge Mr Morfoot’s contribution to our city and, on behalf of my fellow Councillors and the community of Penrith, offer our deepest sympathy to Harry’s wife Dorothy, his children Bronwyn and Glen and their families.
Councillor Karen McKeown
Mayor
That the Mayoral Minute on The Passing of Harry Morfoot be received.
|
Reports of Committees
Item Page
1 Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 12 October 2015 1
2 Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee Meeting held on 19 October 2015 5
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
Local Traffic Committee
MEETING
HELD ON 12 October, 2015
PRESENT
Wayne Mitchell (Chair) – Executive Manager Environment and City Development, Councillor Marcus Cornish, Councillor Tricia Hitchen – Representative for Member for Penrith,
Mark Elliott – St Marys LAC, Steve Grady – Busways, Mark Carruthers – Roads and Maritime Services, Adam Wilkinson – Engineering Services Manager, David Drozd – Traffic Engineering Coordinator, Ruth Byrnes – Senior Traffic Officer, Catherine Waerner – Road Safety Officer, Caitlin Bailey – Trainee Engineer, Bernie Meier – Signs and Linemarking Officer, Noel Fuller – Ranger.
APOLOGIES |
Mayor Karen McKeown – Representative for Member for Londonderry, Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM, James Suprain – Roads and Maritime Services, Graham Green – Senior Traffic Engineer, Daniel Davidson, Senior Traffic Engineer, Steven Purvis – Senior Ranger. |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 7 September 2015 |
The minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting of 7 September 2015 were confirmed. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Nil.
DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS
Outcome 3 - We can get around the City
1 Talara Avenue and Coco Drive, Glenmore Park - Proposed 'No Stopping' zones |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Talara Avenue and Coco Drive, Glenmore Park - Proposed 'No Stopping' zones be received 2. ‘No Stopping’ zones be installed for the statutory 10 metres from the corners of the intersection of Talara Avenue and Coco Drive, Glenmore Park. 3. Affected residents, Caroline Chisholm College and the correspondent be advised of Council’s resolution. |
2 Lemongrove Road and Macquarie Avenue, Penrith - Proposed Edge Linemarking |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Lemongrove Road and Macquarie Avenue, Penrith - Proposed Edge Linemarking be received. 2. Edge linemarking and a parking shoulder be provided for the length of Lemongrove Road and Macquarie Avenue, Penrith as shown in Appendices 1 and 2. 3. The resident who reported the matter be advised of Council’s resolution. |
3 Lonsdale Street, St Marys - Endorsement of Design Plan AL141 |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Lonsdale Street, St Marys - Endorsement of Design Plan AL141 be received. 2. Consultation be undertaken with affected residents and businesses. 3. Subject to no substantial objections from affected residents and businesses, design plan AL141 (date September 2015) be endorsed for construction, with funding provided from Council’s current or a future Urgent Local Traffic Committee budget. 4. A street lighting assessment be conducted in accordance with Council’s Public Domain Lighting Policy (August 2004) to ensure compliance with the relevant lighting category. |
4 Somerset Street, Kingswood - Proposed Edge Linemarking |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Somerset Street, Kingswood - Proposed Edge Linemarking be received. 2. An increase to no Stopping zones and a Convex Mirror not be supported. 3. A marked edge line treatment is provided along Somerset Street between the GWH and Derby Street with a general 2.5m offset from the face of kerb, in accordance with Appendices 1-2. 4. Through adjustments to the length of No Stopping restrictions, a total of eight carparking spaces be returned to all day parking and are marked accordingly in Somerset Street north of Orth Street (eastern side), Orth Street east of Somerset Street (northern side), Hargrave Street east of Somerset Street (north and south sides), Somerset Street south of Derby Street and Derby Street east of Somerset Street; in accordance with Appendices 2-5. 5. Mr. Paul Summers, Manager Safety/Consumer Engagement of Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District be advised of Council’s resolution. |
5 Tandara Council Carpark (near Evan Street), South Penrith |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on Tandara Council Carpark (near Evan Street), South Penrith be received. 2. The current ‘No Parking Council Vehicles Excepted’ zone of four spaces be moved to the north east corner of the Tandara Council Carpark, as per Appendix 2. 3. The current ‘No Parking Council Vehicles Excepted’ zone in the Tandara carpark be replaced with four spaces of ‘15 minute parking 9:00am – 10:00am & 2:00pm – 3:00pm’, as per Appendix 2. 4. Two new spaces be created against the kerb on the southern side of the Tandara carpark with ‘15 minute parking 9:00am – 10:00am & 2:00pm – 3:00pm’ restrictions, as per Appendix 2. 5. The ‘cross-hatched’ area in the south eastern corner of the Tandara carpark be extended to maintain access to the mobility parking space, as per Appendix 2. 6. A “No Stopping” zone of 9 metres be installed on the southern side of the Tandara carpark between the single ‘No Parking Council Vehicles Excepted’ space that accommodates the Before and After School Care minivan and the ‘15 minute parking 9:00am – 10:00am & 2:00pm – 3:00pm’ spaces, as per Appendix 2. 7. The parent who made the enquiry, and Tandara Preschool and After School Care Centre, be advised of Council’s resolution. 8. Council review the area to the west of the site for possible use as overflow car parking. 9. Rangers be advised of Council’s resolution. 10. Jamison High School be advised of Council’s resolution. |
GENERAL BUSINESS
UB 1 Review of Post Office Box and Taxi Rank Parking in High Street, Penrith |
Councillor Tricia Hitchen (Representative of Member of Penrith) requested an update on Council’s review of the post office box and taxi rank parking in High Street, Penrith. RECOMMENDED That Engineering Services Manager, Adam Wilkinson, provide Councillor Tricia Hitchen with an update. |
UB 2 5 Minute Parking at Penrith Westfield |
Councillor Marcus Cornish advised the Committee that the recently implemented 5 minute parking zone outside Penrith Westfield is working well. There is now less congestion in the area and Council should consider implementing the same provisions in other parts of Penrith’s CBD. RECOMMENDED That the information be noted. |
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 9:37am.
That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 12 October, 2015 be adopted.
|
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
Policy Review Committee
MEETING
HELD ON 19 October, 2015
PRESENT
Her Worship the Mayor, Councillor Karen McKeown, Deputy Mayor, Councillor Ross Fowler OAM, and Councillors Jim Aitken OAM, Bernard Bratusa, Prue Car MP, Kevin Crameri OAM, Marcus Cornish, Greg Davies (arrived 7:07pm), Mark Davies, Maurice Girotto, Ben Goldfinch, Jackie Greenow OAM, John Thain and Michelle Tormey.
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Leave of Absence was previously requested by Councillor Tricia Hitchen for the period 15 October 2015 to 25 October 2015 inclusive.
RECOMMENDED that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as a matter of urgency. |
Her Worship the Mayor, Karen McKeown, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
RECOMMENDED that leave of absence be granted to Councillor Tricia Hitchen for the period 15 October 2015 to 25 October 2015 inclusive. |
APOLOGIES |
There were no apologies. |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Policy Review Committee Meeting - 14 September 2015 |
The minutes of the Policy Review Committee Meeting of 14 September 2015 were confirmed. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no declarations of interest.
DELIVERY PROGRAM REPORTS
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
2 NBN Briefing Executive Manager – Corporate, Vicki O’Kelly introduced the report and invited Michael Tyler from NBN Co to give a presentation. Councillor Jim Aitken OAM left the meeting, the time
being 7:06pm. |
RECOMMENDED that the information contained in the report on NBN Briefing be received. |
Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places
1 St Marys Town Centre Corporation Business Plan 2015-16 City Centres Coordinator, Terry Agar introduced the report and invited Alex Karavas – Chair of the St Marys Town Centre Corporation to give a presentation. |
RECOMMENDED That: 1. The information contained in the report on St Marys Town Centre Corporation Business Plan 2015-16 be received. 2. Council endorse the Business Plan 2015-16 for the St Marys Town Centre Corporation. |
3 Update on the Capacity Review Executive Manager – Corporate, Vicki O’Kelly introduced the report. |
RECOMMENDED that the information contained in the report on Update on the Capacity Review be received. |
REQUESTS FOR REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS
RR 1 Werrington House |
Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM requested that a letter be sent from the Mayor to the owners of Werrington House thanking them for the recently held open day. |
URGENT BUSINESS
UB 1 Leave of Absence |
Councillor Greg Davies requested Leave of Absence for the period 22 October 2015 to 30 October 2015 inclusive. |
RECOMMENDED that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as a matter of urgency.
Her Worship the Mayor, Karen McKeown, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
|
RECOMMENDED that Leave of Absence be granted to Councillor Greg Davies for the period 22 October 2015 to 30 October 2015 inclusive. |
UB 2 Leave of Absence |
Councillor Mark Davies requested Leave of Absence for 2 November 2015. |
RECOMMENDED that the matter be brought forward and dealt with as a matter of urgency.
Her Worship the Mayor, Karen McKeown, ruled that the matter was urgent and should be dealt with at the meeting.
|
RECOMMENDED that Leave of Absence be granted to Councillor Mark Davies for 2 November 2015. |
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed the time being 8:36.
That the recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendations of the Policy Review Committee meeting held on 19 October, 2015 be adopted.
|
Item Page
Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth
1 Development Application DA15/0386 - Consolidation of two (2) Existing Lots and Torrens Title Subdivision Creating Four (4) Lots and Associated Stormwater Drainage Works Lot 561 DP 834943 and Lot 1 DP 849973 at (Nos.207 and 209) Bennett Road, St Clair Applicant: Penrith City Council; Owner: ~Penrith City Council
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter. 1
2 Development Application 14/0465.03 Modification to Two Storey Dwelling and Detached Single Storey Garage Lot 2332 DP 1184497 (No.) 1 Laimbeer Place, Penrith Applicant: Eden Brae Homes; Owner: ~Craig and Vicki Hill
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter. 9
Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places
3 Tender Reference RFT 15/16-04 Demolition of Ramps to Allen Place Elevated Carpark, Penrith 18
4 Magnetic Places Grants Program 2015-16 20
Outcome 5 - We care about our environment
6 St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Catchment Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study 38
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
7 Pecuniary Interest Returns 50
8 Public Open Space Reinvestment Project - Erskine Park update 58
9 2014-15 Financial Statements 71
10 Summary of Investments and Banking 1 September 2015 to 30 September 2015 73
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 1 - We can work close to home
There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 2 - We plan for our future growth
Item Page
1 Development Application DA15/0386 - Consolidation of two (2) Existing Lots and Torrens Title Subdivision Creating Four (4) Lots and Associated Stormwater Drainage Works Lot 561 DP 834943 and Lot 1 DP 849973 at (Nos.207 and 209) Bennett Road, St Clair Applicant: Penrith City Council; Owner: ~Penrith City Council
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter. 1
2 Development Application 14/0465.03 Modification to Two Storey Dwelling and Detached Single Storey Garage Lot 2332 DP 1184497 (No.) 1 Laimbeer Place, Penrith Applicant: Eden Brae Homes; Owner: ~Craig and Vicki Hill
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter. 9
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
1 |
Development Application DA15/0386 - Consolidation of two (2) Existing Lots and Torrens Title Subdivision Creating Four (4) Lots and Associated Stormwater Drainage Works Lot 561 DP 834943 and Lot 1 DP 849973 at (Nos.207 and 209) Bennett Road, St Clair Applicant: Penrith City Council; Owner: Penrith City Council |
|
Compiled by: Aimee Lee, Senior Environmental Planner
Authorised by: Paul Lemm, Development and Environmental Health Manager
Outcome |
We plan for our future growth |
Strategy |
Facilitate quality development that encourages a range of housing types, employment, recreation and lifestyle opportunities |
Service Activity |
Delivery timely assessment, regulation and certification of development and building work in accordance with statutory requirements |
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.
Executive Summary
Council is in receipt of a Development Application for land owned by Penrith City Council. In accordance with Councils procedures the matter is reported to Council for determination. The proposal is for consent to subdivide existing lots into four (4) Torrens Title lots and provision of associated stormwater drainage works at Nos. 207 and 209 Bennett Road, St Clair. Three (3) of the newly created lots will be disposed of for future residential development. The remaining lot will accommodate an existing child care centre.
No. 207 Bennett Road is zoned RE1 Public Recreation and No. 209 Bennett Road is zoned R2 Low Density Residential under the provisions of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP 2010). The proposed subdivision is permitted with consent under Clause 2.6 of LEP 2010. The development site is not subject to the Lot Size Map of LEP 2010 and therefore there is no minimum lot size applicable to the proposed subdivision.
The application was exhibited and notified between 29 April 2015 and 13 May 2015 to twenty-two (22) owners and occupiers of adjoining properties. Council has not received any submissions objecting to the proposal.
An assessment under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 has been undertaken and the application has demonstrated that the objectives of LEP 2010 and Penrith Development Control Plan 2014 are met. The Development Application is therefore recommended for approval subject to conditions.
Given Council is the owner of the property, an independent review of the assessment of the proposed subdivision has been undertaken (refer Attachment 1). The independent review has found all relevant statutory requirements have been considered and due process followed. The independent reviewer concurs with the findings of the assessment report and the recommendation for approval.
Background
No. 207 Bennett Road has been used as a child care centre since 1985 following an unconditional development consent granted on the property.
A temporary Police Station was operating from No. 209 Bennett Road from 1995 following a development consent granted for the installation of a demountable building and operation as a temporary Police Station. The NSW Police ceased to operate from the site in June 2005.
Council’s Property Development Section presented a report to Council on 8 September 2008 recommending purchase of No. 209 Bennett Road. It was stated in the report that the site will be subdivided creating three (3) residential lots for future sale purposes. At the meeting, Council resolved to purchase No. 209 Bennett Road from NSW Police.
Site & Surrounds
The development site is situated on the western side of Bennett Road, bounded by Coonawarra Drive to the northeast. Erskine Park Road is situated approximately 500m to the southeast of the site. Development in the area is predominantly low density residential developments consisting single dwellings of different designs and external finishes.
The site consists of two (2) lots, Lot 561 DP 834943 (No. 207 Bennett Road) and Lot 1 DP 849973 (No. 209 Bennett Road). The development site has a combined area of 4556m² and it falls approximately 1.25m from south to north.
Existing improvements on the site include the Stepping Stones Early Learning Centre, owned and operated by Penrith City Council, at No. 207 Bennett Road. No. 209 Bennett Road is vacant. There are existing trees on the development site and a majority of the trees are situated along the eastern boundary of No. 207 Bennett Road.
Refer to Attachment 2 - Locality Map for further details.
Proposed Development
The proposed development involves:
· Subdivision, by Torrens Title, of the two existing consolidated lots creating four (4) new lots.
· Provision of a drainage easement along the western boundary of proposed Lots 62, 63 and 64 connecting to an existing easement to properties south of the development site.
· Dedication of 125.3m² of land in front of proposed Lots 63 and 64 for road widening to reflect an existing indented bay on Bennett Road.
The drainage easement and location of driveways for each of the lots are to be included in an 88b instrument.
Details of the Torrens Title lots resulting from the subdivision are outlined below:
Proposed Lot No. |
Proposed Lot Size |
Future Use |
Lot 61 |
2792m² |
Stepping Stones Early Learning Centre |
Lot 62 |
548m² |
Future Dwelling |
Lot 63 |
547.1m² |
Future Dwelling |
Lot 64 |
546.2m² |
Future Dwelling |
Refer to Attachment 3 for Plan of Subdivision and Attachment 4 for engineering plans.
Planning Assessment
The proposed development has been assessed in accordance with the matters for consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and having regard to those matters, the following issues have been identified for further consideration.
Section 79C(1)(a)(i) – The Provisions of any Environmental Planning Instrument
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP 55)
Council's records show that the development site was vacant until development consent was granted in 1985 for the construction of a child care centre at No. 207 Bennett Road. Further approval was granted for the installation of a demountable building on the site for the purposes of a temporary police station at No. 209 Bennett Road in 1995. The NSW Police vacated No. 209 Bennett Road in June 2005 and the site has been vacant since.
A review of Council's records and historic aerial photographs cannot identify any contaminating activities on the development site and the use of the site has been generally consistent with the surrounding residential use. Furthermore, child care centres and police stations are not contaminating activities and there is no known contamination on the site. In view of the above. Council can be satisfied that the site is suitable for the proposed subdivision future residential use and the proposal is in accordance with Clause 7 of SEPP 55.
Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River (SREP 20)
The aim of this plan is to protect the environment of the Hawkesbury-Nepean River system by ensuring that the impacts of future land uses are considered in a regional context. The stormwater drainage works associated with the proposed subdivision is considered minor and is unlikely to have adverse environmental impact subject to appropriate controls during drainage construction works (see recommended Standard Conditions B005, D001 and D009). The Development Application is therefore considered satisfactory and can be supported subject to appropriate conditions.
Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP 2010)
No 207 Bennett Road is zoned RE1 Public Recreation and No. 209 Bennett Road is zoned R2 Low Density Residential under the provisions of LEP 2010. The proposed subdivision is permitted under Clause 2.6 of the LEP for both RE1 Public Recreation zone and R2 Low Density Residential zone.
According to the Lot Size Map, there is no minimum lot size requirement applicable to RE1 Public Recreation zone (No. 207 Bennett Road). The R2 Low Density Residential zone, immediately adjacent to the development site, is subject to a minimum lot size of 550m². Notwithstanding No. 209 Bennett Road is zoned R2 Low Density Residential, it is not identified on the Lot Size Map and the minimum lot size of 550m² is not applicable. In turn, a requirement for justification for contravention under Clause 4.6 Exceptions to Development Standard for Lots 62 to 64, with allotment size below 550m², is not applicable.
The proposed subdivision will facilitate future low density residential development and therefore is consistent with the LEP objective and R2 Low Density Residential zone objective with respect to:-
· Accommodate future population growth by providing a diversity of housing types.
· Satisfy the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment.
Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) – The Provisions of any Development Control Plan
Penrith Development Control Plan 2014
Penrith Development Control Plan (DCP) 2014 applies and Chapter C11 Subdivision in particular, is relevant. Assessment of the proposal against the relevant provisions of the DCP is outlined below.
The proposed subdivision will create a total of four (4) lots of which three (3) will be disposed of for future residential development. The proposal is consistent with the objectives and controls of the DCP with respect to the following:-
· The allotment size, shape and orientation of the lots have taken into consideration the subdivision character of the locality and integrates satisfactorily with the subdivision layout of the adjacent land.
· The proposed subdivision has considered the topography of the site and will not impact on any existing trees on the site.
· To enhance the streetscape, a condition is recommended for the provision of street trees at a rate of one (1) tree per lot.
· The applicant has made satisfactory arrangement for inter-allotment drainage in accordance with Council’s engineering advice.
· The proposed lot size, varying from 546m² to 548m², is capable of supporting the siting and construction of a dwelling and ancillary outbuildings while maintaining the amenity through adequate provision of setbacks, solar access, landscaping, carparking, servicing and drainage.
· The depth-to-frontage ratio of the proposed lots (measuring approximately 19m wide x 30m deep), are capable of containing a rectangle measuring 10m x 12m or 8m x 15m, behind the building line.
· The proposed lots will allow for sufficient area and dimensions for the provision of private outdoor space, solar access and daylight access and minimise possible overshadowing impact on adjoining properties.
· The frontage width will permit vehicular and pedestrian access.
· The land has demonstrated, under SEPP 55, that it is suitable for its intended residential use.
· The site is adequately serviced by water, electricity and telephone. A Standard Condition (Q001) is recommended for obtaining clearance from service providers to ensure satisfactory arrangements for connection of services to support future developments.
Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of the Development
Context and Setting
The site is part zoned RE1 Public Recreation and part zoned R2 Low Density Residential under LEP 2010. The proposed subdivision is permitted under Clause 2.6 of the LEP for both RE1 Public Recreation zone and R2 Low Density Residential zone. Notwithstanding the site is not subject to the Lot Size Map of the LEP, the proposed lots varying from 546m² to 548m², and an average frontage width of 19m, are sympathetic to existing lot sizes in the locality and are capable of supporting the construction of a single dwelling with sufficient separation from the boundaries and provision of a functional outdoor recreation area.
Notwithstanding the proposed lot size is below the 550m² requirement generally applicable to R2 zone, the variation is negligible and assessment of the proposal against DCP 2014 has demonstrated that the proposed subdivision, specifically with respect to its allotment dimensions, configuration and orientation, integrates well with the established subdivision pattern in the locality and will not have any adverse impact on the streetscape. Furthermore, the proposed residential lots are sympathetic to the established residential character of the locality.
Water, Soil, Air and Microclimate
The applicant has submitted an amended inter-allotment drainage plan. The amended plan is generally satisfactory and no engineering objection is raised. A special condition is recommended for the relocation of the pits and pipe on proposed Lot 64 clear of the existing tree on the lot.
Site Design
The proposed subdivision, with respect to its allotment size, shape and orientation, is sympathetic to established subdivision pattern in the locality. The proposed site area is capable to accommodate the construction of a single dwelling with sufficient area for landscaping/private open space.
Social and Economic Impacts
Proposed Lots 62 to 64 will provide additional residential lots for future residential development as envisaged in the 2008 Council report. The residential lots will facilitate residential development and meet the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment.
Section 79C(1)(c) – The Suitability of the Site for the Development
The site is suitable for the proposed development for the following reasons:
· The site is part zoned RE1 Public Recreation and part zoned R2 Low Density Residential under LEP 2010 to accommodate the proposed subdivision and associated future residential developments.
· The proposed subdivision is permitted under Clause 2.6 of LEP 2010.
· The site is adequately serviced by roads, utility services and stormwater infrastructure.
· The site is suitable for the proposed subdivision in accordance with Clause 7 of SEPP 55 given its history did not involve contaminating land uses.
· The site is suitable having regard to the aims and objectives of SREP 20, LEP 2010 and DCP 2014.
Section 79C(1)(d) – Any Submissions
Community Consultation
In accordance with Appendix F4 of Penrith Development Control Plan 2014 – Notification and Advertising, the proposed development was notified to 22 nearby and adjoining residents and exhibited from 29 March 2015 to 13 April 2015. Council did not receive any submissions in response.
Internal Referrals
The Development Application was referred to Council’s Senior Development Engineer and they have raised no objection subject to conditions.
Section 94 Contributions
Section 94 Contributions are payable for the proposed subdivision as outlined in the following table:
S94 Type |
Proposed Lots |
Rate (Pop) |
Total Population |
Less Credit of Existing Lots |
TOTAL CALCULATION RATE |
District Open Space |
4 |
3.1 |
12.4 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
Local Open Space |
4 |
3.1 |
12.4 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
S94 Payment |
Contribution Rate x Calculation rate |
TOTAL |
|
District Open Space |
6.2 x $1,842 |
$11,420 |
|
Local Open Space |
6.2 x $666 |
$4,129 |
|
|
TOTAL |
$15,549.00 |
|
Section 79C(1)(e) – The Public Interest
The site is suitable for the proposed development. The proposed development is likely to improve the overall appearance of the site. The properties in the immediate vicinity of the site were notified of the development proposal. It is unlikely that the proposed development will adversely impact on adjoining residents, subject to recommended conditions of consent.
Conclusion
The application is considered satisfactory having regard to:
1. The preceding assessment has demonstrated that the proposal has met the relevant provisions of the environmental planning instruments:
a) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
b) State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land.
c) Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River.
d) Penrith City Centre Local Environmental Plan 2010.
2. The site is suitable for the proposal and the development is in the public interest.
3. The assessment has been subject of a satisfactory independent peer review.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application DA15/0386 - Consolidation of two (2) Existing Lots and Torrens Title Subdivision Creating Four (4) Lots and Associated Stormwater Drainage Works Lot 561 DP 834943 and Lot 1 DP 849973 at (Nos.207 and 209) Bennett Road, St Clair be received. 2. Development Application DA15/0386 for the consolidation of two (2) existing lots and Torrens Title Subdivision Creating Four (4) Lots and Associated Stormwater Drainage Works at Lot 561 DP 834943 and Lot 1 DP 849973, at (Nos. 207 and 209) Bennett Road, St Clair be approved subject to the following conditions: 2.1 Standard Conditions A001 Approved Plans B005 Mud/Soil D001 Implement Approved Sediment & Erosion Control Measures D009 Covering of Waste Storage Area D010 Appropriate Disposal of Excavated or Other Waste G001 Installation of Services and Service Clearance (subdivision) H001 Stamped Plans and Erection of Site Notice H002 All forms of Construction H041 Hours of Work K205 Construction Certificates for Subdivision Works K304 Matters to be Addressed Prior to Commencement of Subdivision Works K501A Completion of Subdivision Works K514 Subdivision Compliance Documentation L007 Tree Protection Measures – No TMP with DA L009 Tree Preservation Order L012 Existing Landscaping (for existing development) M001 Prior to Subdivision Work (Applies to subdivision except strata) M008 Linen Plan M013 Street Trees M014 Surveyors Certificate N001 Section 94 Contribution N002 Section 94 Contribution P001 Costs Q001 Notice of Commencement & Appointment of PCA2
3. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all necessary documentation.
|
ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES
Independent Review |
2 Pages |
Attachments Included |
|
Locality Plan |
1 Page |
Attachments Included |
|
Subdivision Plan |
1 Page |
Attachments Included |
|
Engineering Plans |
3 Pages |
Attachments Included |
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
2 |
Development Application 14/0465.03 Modification to Two Storey Dwelling and Detached Single Storey Garage Lot 2332 DP 1184497 (No.) 1 Laimbeer Place, Penrith Applicant: Eden Brae Homes; Owner: Craig and Vicki Hill |
|
Compiled by: Colin Wood, Coordinator Fire Safety and Certification
Authorised by: Tracy Chalk, Waste and Community Protection Manager
Outcome |
We plan for our future growth |
Strategy |
Facilitate quality development that encourages a range of housing types, employment, recreation and lifestyle opportunities |
Service Activity |
Delivery timely assessment, regulation and certification of development and building work in accordance with statutory requirements |
Procedural note: Section 375A of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a division be called in relation to this matter.
Executive Summary
Council is in receipt of a Section 96 Application to modify the internal floor layout of an approved two storey dwelling and modify the side setback of the detached single storey garage. The original development application (DA14/0465) was approved by Council Officers under delegated authority on 17 December 2014.
The modification seeks to change the internal ground floor layout of the dwelling and decrease the side setback of the detached single garage.
The request to amend the garage side setback from 900mm to 50mm is supported by a modified ‘Plan of Easements’ in which an easement for access, maintenance and overhang has been created on the adjoining property (Lot 2333). Prior to the issue of a construction certificate for the garage, this easement is required to be modified to extend the entire length of the garage on lot 2332 and evidence provided for the lodgement of registration with NSW Land and Property Information. The final occupation certificate shall not be issued until such time as the plan is registered.
The site is zoned R1 General Residential under the provisions of Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010. A two storey dwelling and detached single storey garage is permissible with consent.
An assessment under Section 79C and Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended) (EP&A Act) has been undertaken and the application is recommended for approval.
This application has been reported to Council as the ownership of the land has since been registered to an employee of Council.
Background
On 17 December 2014, approval was granted (under DA14/0465) for a two storey dwelling and detached single storey garage on the subject lot. The lot was unregistered at time of approval. The original garage was proposed to have a 50mm side setback from the eastern boundary. The proposed plan of subdivision created a 900mm easement for access, maintenance and overhang along the eastern boundary. As such, a condition was placed on the consent (Condition No. 9) stating “The detached garage is to be setback a minimum 900mm to the rear boundary”.
A modified ‘Plan of Easements’ in which an easement for access, maintenance and overhang has now been registered (DP 1210925). This new plan partially removes the easement for access, maintenance and overhang from Lot 2332 and creates a new easement for access, maintenance and overhang on the adjoining property (Lot 2333). This easement on the adjoining lot allows the construction of the proposed modified garage to be located closer to the eastern boundary.
Site and Surrounds
The 40 hectare North Penrith site is centrally located directly adjacent to Penrith Railway Station and immediately to the north of the Penrith City Centre. It is a strategic site, located within the Penrith Regional Centre as identified in the Metropolitan Plan 2036 and North West Draft Subregional Strategy. The greater locality is characterised by a mixture of residential, industrial and recreational uses. Large industrial activities are located to the north on the opposite side of Coreen Avenue.
The land subject to this application is located on a corner Lot 2332 (No. 1) Laimbeer Place and Empire Circuit, Penrith. The site is a rectangular shaped lot and 369m² in size.
The Proposed Development
The submitted Section 96 application seeks to modify the approved internal floor layout of the approved two storey dwelling and modify the side setback of the detached single storey garage. This will include deleting Condition No. 9 of development consent DA14/0465 which states “The detached garage is to be setback a minimum 900mm to the rear boundary”.
Planning Assessment
The development has been assessed in accordance with the matters for consideration under Section 79C and 96(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and having regard to those matters, the following issues have been identified for further consideration:
1. Section 79C(1)(a)(i) - Any environmental planning instrument
State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
This Policy ensures the implementation of the BASIX scheme which encourages sustainable residential development. It requires certain kinds of residential development to be accompanied by a list of commitments to be carried out by applicants.
A BASIX Certificate was submitted with the original development application demonstrating compliance with set targets applicable for a dwelling.
Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River (SREP 20)
The development has been assessed with regard to the general planning considerations and the specific planning policies and recommended strategies of SREP 20. The proposed development will have minimal impacts on the total catchment management of water quality and water quantity.
Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 (PLEP 2010)
The site is zoned R1 General Residential under the provisions of PLEP 2010. The proposed development is permissible with development consent. The proposal satisfies the objectives and provisions of PLEP 2010.
2. Section 79C(1)(a)(ii) - Any draft environmental planning instrument
There are no draft environmental planning instruments apply to this site.
3. Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) - Any development control plan
Penrith Development Control Plan 2014 (DCP 2014)
Part D2 – “Residential Development” is applicable to the current development application as well as Part E11 Penrith (Part B – North Penrith).
The proposal generally complies with the numerical development standards and is consistent with the aims and objectives of the DCP.
The proposed development is also subject to North Penrith Design Guidelines 2012. The modification to the two-storey dwelling involves internal alterations only and continues to comply with the design guidelines. The modification of the garage setback to be 50mm from the eastern boundary is also suitable as it now adjoins an easement for access maintenance and overhang on the adjoining property.
Prior to the issue of a construction certificate for the garage, the ‘Easement for access, maintenance and overhang 0.9 wide’ identified as ‘B’ on lot 2333 DP1210925 is required to be modified to extend the length of the approved garage on lot 2332 and evidence provided for the lodgement of registration with NSW Land and Property Information. The final occupation certificate shall not be issued until such time as the plan is registered.
4. Section 79C (1)(b) - The likely impacts of the development
Built and Natural Environment
The development is sympathetic to the streetscape and is consistent with the bulk, scale and design of other dwellings in the area. The development provides for appropriate separation between dwellings and does not detract from the amenity of neighbouring properties.
The development satisfies Council’s requirements for the provision of car parking and traffic generated by the development can be accommodated by the capacity of the existing road network in the locality.
The development satisfies sustainable development principles through its BASIX certificate commitments.
The site has adequate utility services and infrastructure. Appropriate controls for the disposal of stormwater, in addition to soil erosion and sediment control measures have been included as conditions of consent and will ensure the development does not have an adverse impact on the natural environment.
Social and Economic
The proposed dwelling is compatible with the surrounding and adjacent residential land uses and does not pose any adverse social or economic impact.
5. Section 79C(1)(c) - The suitability of the site for development
The subject site is within an established residential area zoned for residential development.
The site is not known to be affected by any overland flows, landslip or heritage controls.
In view of the assessment, the site attributes are conducive to the type of development proposed and its integration with the character of the surrounding area.
6. Section 79C(1)(d) - Any submissions made in accordance with the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act and Regulations
Community Consultation
In accordance with Appendix F4 of Penrith Development Control Plan 2014 – Notification and Advertising, the proposed modification to the approved development was not required to be notified to neighbouring properties. The original development application (DA14/0465) was notified with the garage setback at 50mm and no objections were received.
7. Section 79C(1)(e) - The public interest
The proposal provides a development that is compatible with the existing streetscape, with minimal adverse impacts on the amenity of the area. The development will not generate any significant issues of public interest.
Section 96- Modification to consent generally
Having regard to the provisions of Section 96 of the Act, the proposed modification is unlikely to have adverse environmental impact and therefore can be treated as a Section 96(1A) modification. A summary of the developments’ performance against the main points of consideration is contained herein:
(a) Is the proposed modification of minimal environmental impact?
The proposed modification comprises minor amendments to the design and location of an approved dwelling and garage. This is deemed to have no adverse environmental impact.
(b) Is the development to which the consent as modified relates substantially the same development as the development for which the consent was originally granted?
The development is substantially the same as the original approval granted under DA14/0465.
(c) Has the modification been notified in accordance with:
(i) the regulations (if the regulations so require) or
(ii) a development control plan, if the consent authority is a council that has made a development control plan that requires the notification or advertising of applications for modification of a development consent
(d) If so, have submissions been considered?
The proposed modification is of a minor nature and did not require neighbour notification.
The original development application (DA14/0465) was notified with the garage setback at 50mm and no objections were received.
Conclusion
The proposed modification maintains a positive development outcome having regard to the heads of consideration under Section 79C and Section 96(1A) of the EP&A Act 1979.
The modification seeking to change the internal ground floor layout of the dwelling and decrease the side setback of the detached single garage is supported by a modified ‘Plan of Easements’ in which an easement for access, maintenance and overhang has been created on the adjoining property (lot 2333).
The modification is substantially the same as that originally approved and therefore it is recommended the subject Section 96 modification be approved.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Development Application 14/0465.03 Modification to Two Storey Dwelling and Detached Single Storey Garage Lot 2332 DP 1184497 (No.) 1 Laimbeer Place, Penrith be received. 2. The Section 96 application to modify the internal layout of the two storey dwelling and amend the garage setback be approved subject to the following amendments. 3. Modify Condition 1 (A001) of DA14/0465 to read as follows: The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the plans numbered 0017966 (Issue B), pages 1 to 11, Issue F dated 26th March 2015, drawn by Eden Brae Homes and stamped approved by Council, the application form, the BASIX Certificate and any supporting information received with the application, except as may be amended in red on the attached plans and by the following conditions. 4. Delete Condition 9 of DA14/0465 to allow the garage to be located closer than 900mm to the eastern boundary. 5. Add an additional condition stating: Prior to the issue of a construction certificate for the garage, the ‘Easement for access, maintenance and overhang 0.9 wide’ identified as ‘B’ on lot 2333 DP1210925 shall be modified to extend the length of the approved garage on lot 2332 and evidence provided for the lodgement of registration with NSW Land and Property Information. The final occupation certificate shall not be issued until such time as the plan is registered. 6. All other conditions in DA14/0465 to remain unchanged. |
ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES
Locality Plan |
1 Page |
Attachments Included |
|
Site Plan |
1 Page |
Attachments Included |
|
Dwelling Elevation and Section Plans |
2 Pages |
Attachments Included |
|
Dwelling Floor Plan |
2 Pages |
Attachments Included |
|
Garage Elevation and Section Plan |
1 Page |
Attachments Included |
|
Garage Floor Plan |
1 Page |
Attachments Included |
Outcome 3 - We can get around the City
There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 4 - We have safe, vibrant places
Item Page
3 Tender Reference RFT 15/16-04 Demolition of Ramps to Allen Place Elevated Carpark, Penrith 18
4 Magnetic Places Grants Program 2015-16 20
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
3 |
Tender Reference RFT 15/16-04 Demolition of Ramps to Allen Place Elevated Carpark, Penrith |
|
Compiled by: Michael Jackson, Design and Projects Manager
Authorised by: David Burns, Executive Manager - City Assets
Outcome |
We have safe, vibrant places |
Strategy |
Provide a safe, efficient road network supported by parking |
Service Activity |
Manage the delivery of Council's major infrastructure projects |
Executive Summary
The Tender (RFT 15/16-04) for the Demolition of Ramps to Allen Place Elevated Carpark, Penrith, was advertised in the Western Weekender on 10 July 2015 and the Sydney Morning Herald on 14 July 2015. The Tender closed on 5 August 2015.
This report advises Council of the outcome of the Tender process and recommends that Council does not accept any tenders for works outlined in the RFT 15/16-04 for the Demolition of Ramps to Allen Place Elevated Carpark, Penrith.
Background
Penrith City Council engaged a specialised engineering consultant to conduct a detailed structural condition inspection of the ramps to Allen Place elevated car park to identify the remaining residual service life of the structure. The consultant was of the opinion that the ramps were in a dilapidated condition with the expectancy of further rapid deterioration, where signs of significant cracking and partially failed sections were already evident.
The ramps were considered unsafe for public access and the inspection report recommended closing of ramps and fencing off the area to prevent public access prior to demolition.
Public access to the ramps was closed on 16 March 2015 by fencing off the area and a scope of demolition works to minimise damage to adjoining structures was developed by engaging an external engineering consultant.
Ongoing discussions with the adjoining property owner having the benefit of the ramps have been occurring. Because of the time needed to reach a position it is considered that the tender process for the ramps should be terminated.
With the removal of vehicular traffic, the risk of collapse has been greatly reduced and the engineers have indicated that the situation is currently acceptable in terms of public safety. Ongoing monitoring of the ramps will be undertaken to ensure public safety is maintained until the entire structure can be demolished.
Current Situation
The primary reason for not continuing with the tender process is due to ongoing discussions with the adjoining property owner and the time until the contract could be let. It may be that eventually a tender will need to be called with a different scope over the demolition of the ramps and bridges.
Tenders Received
For Council’s information tenders were received from the following contractors:
Company |
Company Location |
Directors |
Beasy Pty Ltd |
16 Orchardleigh Street Yennora NSW 2161 Australia |
Bret Baker |
Brefni Excavation & Earth Moving Pty Ltd |
PO Box 8 The Oaks NSW 2570 Australia |
Thomas Brady |
Budget Demolition & Excavation Pty Ltd |
3 Deniehy Street Granville NSW 2142 Australia |
Samaan Habib |
Enviropacific Services Pty Ltd |
16/390 Eastern Valley Way Roseville NSW 2069 Australia |
Cameron McLean Matt Fenson John Mingay |
Tender Advisory Group (TAG) Comment
The Tender Advisory Group (TAG) consisting of the Chief Governance Officer, Stephen Britten and the Acting Senior Governance Officer, Adam Beggs met and discussed the circumstances of this tender process and supports the recommendation outlined in the report.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Tender Reference RFT 15/16-04 Demolition of Ramps to Allen Place Elevated Carpark, Penrith be received 2. In accordance with Section 178 (1)(b) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 that the Council not accept any tender for the Demolition of Ramps to Allen Place Elevated Carpark, Penrith. 3. The tenderers outlined in this report be advised of the situation and thanked for their tender response. |
ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
4 |
Magnetic Places Grants Program 2015-16 |
|
Compiled by: Donita Hulme, Cultural Engagement Officer
Authorised by: Jeni Pollard, Place Manager
Outcome |
We have safe, vibrant places |
Strategy |
Grow and revitalise our centres and neighbourhoods |
Service Activity |
Engage the community in identified priority established areas of the City |
Executive Summary
This report informs Council of the 2015 Magnetic Places Grants Program’s successful outcomes and recommends five new placemaking projects for funding in 2016. It also includes a summary of an external review of the grants program conducted in early 2015.
Magnetic Places is a transforming grants program that positions Penrith City as an innovator in community-driven placemaking. The program is an integral component of Neighbourhood Renewal and capitalises on valuable support from the Parks, Public Domain and Safety, and Corporate Communications and Marketing Departments. One of only a few placemaking grant programs in Australia, Magnetic Places supports projects that:
· aim to creatively transform the way in which residents use or connect with public spaces in their neighbourhoods
· have an artistic, cultural or environmental focus and
· prioritise collaborations between artists, residents and organisations such as schools, businesses and community service providers.
Magnetic Places celebrates diversity, innovation and culture in 12 of Penrith's established neighbourhoods and has produced 60 successful placemaking projects, positively impacting the lives of more than 12,000 residents since 2007. These impacts have included greater community cohesion, improved wellbeing and increased civic participation along with the development of safer and more attractive public spaces in our neighbourhoods.
The program complements Council’s investment in identified priority neighbourhoods as a key component of the endorsed Special Rates Variation (SRV) 2011 and builds upon the Penrith brand values of Transformation, Invention, Harmony and Lifestyle. It also contributes to Service Activities within the City Plan. Magnetic Places continues to grow and evolve as the City's communities collaborate with artists, organisations and each other to celebrate local identity and amplify the vibrancy of Penrith.
Positive impacts of the 2015 Magnetic Places program include:
· 3 new public art works installed
· 7 community events & art exhibitions hosted
· 9 neighbourhood locations activated
· 12 organisations collaborated
· 15 artist facilitators engaged
· 755 residents working together & developing new skills
· 2000+ audience members enjoying the outcomes of these creative placemaking projects.
Background
The Magnetic Places Grants Program was initiated in 2007-08 as a pilot with the objective of enabling residents, community groups, artists and organisations to activate local places. The program is based on placemaking, a multi-faceted approach to the planning, design and management of public spaces. Placemaking capitalises on a neighbourhood’s assets, inspiration, and potential, with the intention of creating public spaces that promote people's health, happiness, and wellbeing. Magnetic Places has a particular focus on the use of artistic processes and cultural activities within placemaking.
Since inception, the program has funded 60 successful projects from 108 applications. It has been a catalyst in making local cultural activity more visible and enabling diverse voices in our communities to be heard. Project evaluations demonstrate that through the ‘making’ part of placemaking the program is contributing to the wellbeing of Penrith residents with participants reporting that they have made new friends, gained confidence and developed new skills amongst many other valuable outcomes.
Magnetic Places has empowered communities to transform public spaces through collaborations with professional artists, community organisations, schools and local business. The program has seeded events and programs which have change public spaces into meaningful places connected to the whole community. Projects have vividly brought public spaces to life, increasing local pride and a sense of belonging by supporting communities to tell their own stories and shape the place where they live.
Over time Magnetic Places has also generated a high level of interest from the Sydney arts sector as well as State and Federal arts and cultural agencies. The program was the recipient of a Local Government Cultural Award at Parliament House NSW in 2010.
In 2013 the grants guidelines were reviewed internally to reflect an emphasis on the activation of local parks and public spaces. As a result, in 2014 the Magnetic Places grants program offered funding in three categories:
1. Community Collaborations: up to $1,500 for small projects which activate local parks
2. Creative Communities: up to $8,000 for projects that use partnerships to activate public spaces and meeting places
3. Seeding Creativity: up to $15,000 per year for large, multi-layered two-year projects that highlight community strengths or respond to a community issue that emerges during the course of the project.
After an external review of Magnetic Places in 2015 (see page 5) indicated that applicants preferred a simpler selection of funding categories, two were offered for the 2016 round:
1. Celebrating Places: $3000 – 5000 for projects that use creative engagement with residents to celebrate a local area or space and/or offer creative responses to local issues through one or a series of activities.
2. Making Places: $5000 – 10,000 for projects that transform a public or local meeting space through creative and cultural collaboration with the community, and offer creative responses to local issues, through a series of activities.
The program has a total of $50,000 dedicated each year for grants disbursement and administrative costs such as marketing and relevant workshops.
Individual artists, local groups, community service providers, arts organisations and others are encouraged to apply each year.
2015 Program
In 2014 Council endorsed funding for nine placemaking projects (total: $48,000) which delivered a number of positive impacts for the community in 2015 including:
· 3 new public art works
· 7 community events & art exhibitions
· 9 neighbourhood locations activated
· 12 collaborations between organisations
· 15 professional artists as facilitators
· 755 residents working together & developing new skills
· 2000+ audience members enjoying the outcomes of these creative placemaking projects.
Highlights from the 2015 Magnetic Places program include:
· Every Face Has a Place: Artist Abbas Makrab led a group of 10 keen parents from St Marys North Public School through the design, creation and installation stages of two vibrant garden mosaics–in Wattle St Reserve and on school grounds. The Wattle St mosaic celebrates the area’s cultural diversity and includes a message of acceptance. The unveiling of the mosaics was celebrated with a special assembly that featured a mass drumming performance by the students as a ‘thankyou’ for the parents group.
· Colyton Kites: Artist Sanhita Banerjee guided 15 young people through the process of kite-making over a series of weeks. The young people then co-hosted a kite-making workshop in Kevin Maley Park for local families, providing a point of connection for local residents with this public space, young people and each other.
· Visual Picnic: Artist Emma Sputnik activated Kingswood’s Wainwright Park on a sunny Saturday with a lively group of Kingswood TAFE students who hosted a series of fun artistic activities that also carried a message of environmental sustainability. The day attracted almost 400 people (including local families, passing customers and dedicated visitors) acting as a forum for fun collaborations and neighbourly introductions in this culturally diverse area.
· Cranebrook: I Have a Dream: A group of 15 young people from Aboriginal, Anglo-Saxon and Pacific Island backgrounds worked with contemporary artists Marian Abboud, George Tillianakis and Jerry Kahale to create sound and image portraits that express and celebrate their aspirations. The final works were shared with local residents through a multimedia showcase.
· Meet St Marys: This two-year project invites locals to share and reshape their thoughts on their neighbourhood. During 2015 the project has met with, interviewed on camera, and tested footage on a range of St Marys locals and project mentees. The first public outcome from this project, the St Marys Minutes series of short videos, is being released online via <facebook.com/meetstmarys/videos>. In February 2016 this project will culminate in a public celebration at Coachman’s Park.
Feedback from these funded projects has been overwhelmingly positive and quotes from participants include:
“We feel connected to the place and each other now. We don’t just ignore each other on the street, we stop, we talk.”
“Can you please let me know when this will be happening again because I want to do it again.”
“I am SO into this!!”
“Thank you so much. When’s the next one?!”
“It was a great learning experience. I enjoyed meeting new people. It was a great and friendly group who always had a great time. Our teacher was fantastic.”
And from The Song Room (Every Face Has a Place, North St Marys):
“100% respondents to our participant survey reported felling ‘more connected to’ and ‘more pride in’ community”.
Grants Program Review
In early 2015 a review process of the Magnetic Places Grants
Program was undertaken
“To identify areas for improvement within the program that will
increase usability and access for potential applicants while maintaining or
improving the quality of outcomes for the Penrith community”.
The review was conducted by consultant, Dr Cheryle Yin-Lo, a community cultural development (CCD) and local government specialist. The review was comprised of two stages, the first being a review of program data for all previous grant rounds 2007-14. An immediate finding was that applicants who do not discuss their potential project with Council staff are always unsuccessful in their bid for funding. This affirms what staff have noted over the years that pre-lodgement discussions provide applicants with a valuable opportunity to discuss project concepts, eligibility requirements and selection criteria before finalising their grant application. Indeed the 2016 grants intake includes an application that was not discussed with Council staff before lodging and was found to be ineligible on two counts.
The second stage of the review included an online survey sent to all 2011-2015 grant applicants and telephone interviews with stakeholders including grant recipients, unsuccessful grant applicants, community organisations and a Councillor. The consultant’s final report provided analysed feedback on key areas such as program marketing, the grant application process, and interaction with Council staff. The report notes that overall “it is evident that the Program to date has had a positive impact on a number of levels” with a variety of respondents providing overwhelmingly positive comments on the program such as,
“I take my hat off to Penrith Council for their investment and funding of the Magnetic Places Program. I know it’s a lot of work in managing the Program but the benefits and possibilities of new partnerships and players is so valuable. It is also so accessible for individuals to apply”. (Community worker)
“Very good. The Program really helps community through projects”.
(Artist, project facilitator)
“The Program really helps the community at large especially geographically in the smaller villages/hamlets in Penrith. It is especially important in the role it plays in placemaking and community cultural development practice. It is a very accessible program especially if you have no art experience”. (Councillor, community advocate)
The consultant's final report also included 10 recommendations. Half of these recommendations were immediately implemented as part of the 2016 grants program:
1. Funding streams were reduced from three to two
2. All grants-related resources were revised into plain English
3. Clear information was provided on directly relevant Council processes
4. Role of Council staff was clearly stated in the grants guidelines
5. The general public and non-arts organisations were included in the marketing plan.
Two more recommendations will be implemented as the program rolls out:
6. Continue to provide the annual project management workshop for successful applicants
7. Broaden program reporting to include data and mapping of funded activities to identify neighbourhoods, emerging groups and CALD communities that are not well represented in funded projects to date.
The three remaining recommendations will have to be considered over time given their reach extends beyond the Magnetic Places program:
8. Support Aboriginal community capacity building in arts project management
9. Broker opportunities between communities, artists and organisations
10. Identify mentoring opportunities amongst those groups.
2016 Program Activity
|
|
The 2016 Magnetic Places Grants Program promotional campaign began on 22 July, giving Council four weeks in which to generate interest ahead of the six-week application period beginning 20 August. During that time Council hosted a free grant writing workshop and received over 30 enquiries about the grants which in turn generated 14 grant applications requesting a total of $145,077 in funding. Each year the program has a total of $50,000 available for grants. In 2016 the amount available is $35,000 as the Meet St Marys project from 2015 was funded for a two-year period and in 2016 will receive $15,000.
The promotional campaign began with key placement of the Magnetic Places image on the Council website’s image carousel, distribution of A5 postcards and an email campaign to past applicants, Western Sydney arts organisations and local community service providers.
All promotional information directed enquiries to the Grants page of the Council website where relevant information was available along with the revised guidelines and a link to the SmartyGrants online grants submission platform (for the period 20 August-28 September). The grant writing workshop was held on Friday 28 August with individual artists, residents, community service providers, arts organisations and a local radio DJ in attendance. Local newspapers carried news items on Magnetic Places and local radio station Vintage FM also promoted the grants program and workshop.
2016 Applications and Assessment
A total of 14 applications were received for the 2016 Magnetic Places grants program, a higher than average outcome. The majority of applications received were also of a higher quality than average which resulted in this being a very competitive round totalling $145,077 in requested funds. This was well in excess of the $35,000 available for funding.
Applications were submitted online using SmartyGrants and for the first time assessment of the applications was also undertaken online. A three-person assessment panel was formed to review all applications against the selection criteria and decide on recommendations to Council for funding. The panel comprised two Council staff members and a sector representative:
1. Jeni Pollard, Place Manager
2. Judy Cobb, Neighbourhood Facilities Coordinator
3. David Ryan, Arts facilitator and TV sports editor (previous applicant).
Of the 14 applications received, 13 satisfactorily met eligibility requirements with only one deemed ineligible as it was for an annual event and some of its activities were fee-based (see Appendix 1). The remaining applications were assessed by the panel against the selection criteria on their merits and ranked according to how well they met these criteria. One application was lodged under Category 1 (Celebrating Places) and 12 under Category 2 (Making Places). The recommended projects are all for Category 2 Making Places.
Nine applications featured strong project concepts. When ranked against selection criteria and available funding, the competitive assessment process resulted in five projects being shortlisted. These projects requested a total of $47,470, still exceeding the available funding of $35,000. The key contacts of each of the five projects were approached as ‘prioritised applicants’ and invited to consider modifying their project scope and budget to meet a nominated figure (see Appendix 2). All five responded in the affirmative and the adjusted total recommended is $35,300. The projects recommended for funding appear below in Table 1.
In addition to the total request for funding is $15,000 for year 2 of the Meet St Marys project, as endorsed in 2014, bringing the total number of projects for 2016 to six.
Council officers will provide feedback to unsuccessful applicants as well as suggestions of alternative funding, where appropriate, to assist their efforts with any future applications.
Table 1- Projects Recommended for Funding
Project |
Neighbourhood |
Applicant |
Recommended |
Our Place Our Space |
Cranebrook |
Wentworth Community Housing |
8,000 |
Under the Awnings |
North St Marys |
Information and Cultural Exchange |
7,500 |
Creating Bridges Across Cultures with Drumming |
St Marys |
Friends of STARTTS |
7,000 |
Billy Cart Workshops and Derby Day |
Colyton North St Marys Werrington |
Community Junction |
6,000 |
Do You See I What I See? |
St Marys |
Lisa Cross |
6,800
|
|
|
TOTAL |
$35,300 |
Conclusion
Magnetic Places is a popular and progressive grants program that connects creative resident activity in priority neighbourhoods with a city-wide approach to wellbeing and cultural vitality. As a program, Magnetic Places contributes strongly to Penrith’s community wellbeing and place aspirations as articulated in the City Strategy,
“Creating a successful partnership between the arts, culture and City renewal and growth requires moving beyond a traditional focus. This partnership requires a new focus on how residents experience their City, their sense of place and identity in its diverse and many expressions and how the City speaks to its residents. Place making and public art contributes to a stimulating and active public domain as well as resident connection in local neighbourhoods.”
In 2015 over 750 residents collaborated with 27 artists, community service providers and arts organisations to amplify their own creativity and enhance the vitality of their 9 locations. These placemaking projects also positively affected 2000 audience members and visitors.
Five projects totalling $35,300 are recommended for funding in 2016. These projects represent an opportunity to activate a range of local places that will enrich our neighbourhoods and address a range of community issues.
If endorsed by Council, six projects totalling $50,300 (including Year 2 of the Meet St Marys project) will be funded to provide Penrith residents with opportunities to transform the ways in which they and others connect with local public spaces. These projects will capitalise on their neighbourhood assets, inspiration and potential, all with the intention of creating public spaces and communities that promote people's health, happiness, and wellbeing. This creative empowerment will continue to position Penrith City as a leader in community-driven placemaking and creative neighbourhood renewal.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Magnetic Places Grants Program 2015-16 be received. 2. The five projects listed in Table 1 are funded as part of the Magnetic Places Grants Program 2016. |
ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES
Magnetic Places 2016 Applications not Recommended for Funding |
1 Page |
Appendix |
|
Magnetic Places 2016 Applications Recommendaed for Funding |
1 Page |
Appendix |
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
Appendix 1 - Magnetic Places 2016 Applications not Recommended for Funding
Appendix 2 - Magnetic Places 2016 Applications Recommended for Funding
5 |
Tender Reference 15/16-05 Construction of Sportsfield & Associated Infrastructure for Glenmore Park Sportsfield Stage 2, Park Avenue, Glenmore Park |
|
Compiled by: Mladen Mejakic, Project Officer - Capital Works
Ari Fernando, Major Projects & Design Co-ordinator
Authorised by: Michael Jackson, Design and Projects Manager
Outcome |
We have safe, vibrant places |
Strategy |
Provide a safe, efficient road network supported by parking |
Service Activity |
Manage the delivery of Council's major infrastructure projects |
Executive Summary
As part of a Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA), developers have constructed the southern playing fields for the Glenmore Park Stage 2 development which are now available for public use. The second stage of the works is for Council to design and construct the northern playing fields and central amenities block. This is to be delivered in accordance with the VPA and to match the available contribution collected from the relevant parties to the VPA.
Council engaged design consultants to prepare the design plans of northern playing field including field lighting & irrigation and Council officers will project manage the delivery. The amenities block is being designed in-house by Council officers for a separate public tender shortly. The tender (RFT 15/16-05) for the Construction of Sportsfield & Associated Infrastructure for Glenmore Park Sportsfield Stage 2, Parkway Avenue, Glenmore Park was advertised in the Western Weekender on Friday 7 August 2015 and Sydney Morning Herald on Tuesday 11 August 2015. The tender closed on Wednesday 2 September 2015.
This report advises Council of the outcome of the Tender process and recommends that the Tender from Landscape Solutions Pty Ltd be accepted for the scope of works outlined in the RFT 15/16-05 for the Construction of Sportsfield & Associated Infrastructure for Glenmore Park Sportsfield Stage 2, Parkway Avenue Glenmore Park for a total amount of $1,295,882.43 (excluding GST).
Background
The advertised tender (RFT 15/16-05) for the Construction of Sportsfield & Associated Infrastructure for Glenmore Park Sportsfield Stage 2, Parkway Avenue, Glenmore Park, sought tenders from suitability experienced Civil Contractors to carry out the following works:
· Sportsfield construction including lighting, irrigation & drainage works and,
· Carpark construction including lighting, landscaping & associated works.
In response to the Council’s request for tender, 13 complying tenders were received electronically via APET 360.
Tender Evaluation Process
The Tender Evaluation Committee consisted of Laura Schuil (Supply Officer - Contracts), Ari Fernando (Major Projects and Design Coordinator), Rosemarie Canales (Architectural Supervisor - Design and Projects), Mladen Mejakic (Project Officer – Capital Works) and was chaired by Michael Jackson (Design and Projects Manager). Peter Browne (Internal Auditor) provided probity advice and attended the tender evaluation meeting. Technical advice was provided by John Gordon (Parks Manager).
The evaluation criteria advertised and used in assessing the tenders received included the following:
· Business References;
· Demonstrated Ability;
· Works Method and Program;
· Financials;
· Employment Policies;
· Quality Assurance Systems;
· Environmental Management Systems; and
· Work, Health & Safety.
Tenders Review
The tenders received are listed below in apparent price order before any assessment of their compliance and capabilities. All prices are exclusive of GST.
Company |
Tendered Price |
Company Location |
Directors |
Josa Constructions Pty Ltd |
$1,100,000.00 |
Unit 1/37 York Rd, South Penrith NSW 2750 |
Thelma Apokis |
Landscape Solutions Pty Ltd |
$1, 295,882.43 |
16 Distribution Pl, Seven Hills NSW 2147 |
Tim Buckle |
JK Williams Contracting Pty Ltd |
$1,353,601.85 |
44 Jack Williams Dr, Penrith NSW 2750 |
Leigh Hartog |
Ford Civil Contracting Pty Ltd |
$1,386,667.20 |
9 Hattersley St, Arncliffe NSW 2205 |
Stuart Ford & Susan Ford |
Glascott Landscape & Civil Pty Ltd |
$1,436,220.15 |
4/15-17 Chaplin Drive, Lane Cove NSW 2066 |
Matthew Glascott & Matthew Bourke |
Hi Quality Group Pty Ltd |
$1,466,217.82 |
Crn Elizabeth Dr & Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek NSW 2178 |
Patrick Hallinan |
Hargraves Pty Ltd |
$1,529,806.40 |
5/802 Pacific Hwy, Gordon NSW 2081 |
Ben Hargraves |
Design Landscapes Pty Ltd |
$1,552,213.00 |
586 Willoughby Rd, Willoughby NSW 2068 |
Michael Platt |
Regal Innovations Pty Ltd |
$1,609,758.99 |
249 Annangrove Rd, Annangrove NSW 2156 |
Robert Stanton |
North Shore Paving Co. Pty Ltd |
$1,618,460.40 |
16 Moore Av, Lindfield West NSW 2070 |
Ivan K. Tarjan & Ivan S.G. Tarjan |
Structus Pty Ltd |
$2,139,984.00 |
01/6A Glen St, Milsons Point NSW 2061 |
Dennis O’Regan |
Alpal Builders Pty Ltd |
$2,227,150.75 |
PO Box 710, Springwood NSW 2780 |
David Crum |
M & M Prpic Pty Ltd |
$2,549,826.00 |
42 Box Rd, Casula NSW 2170 |
Miles Prpic, Mariana Prpic & Anita Serrano |
Lump Sum Tender prices received for all works included:
· Sportsfield construction including lighting, irrigation & drainage;
· Carpark construction, including lighting; and,
· Landscaping & other works.
The Tender Evaluation Committee determined that Tenders over $1.5 million were in excess of the budget and offered no advantage in further detailed assessment when there were six tenders below that price. These submissions were not considered for further assessment.
Each Tender was evaluated against the criteria above to determine an initial ranking. Consideration was then given to the Tenderer’s price schedules to determine the best value for money solution with competency in technical aspects of the Tender.
Reference checks were also undertaken for both lowest tenderers Josa Constructions Pty Ltd & Landscape Solutions Pty Ltd.
Josa Constructions Pty Ltd offered the lowest apparent tender price however scored a lower effectiveness rating primarily due to their lack of relevant experience in earthworks, landscaping, car parks and similar works. The submitted works methodology was a sample document regarding the installation of a 750 mm diameter sewer rising mains and there was no methodology document supplied for the Glenmore Park Stage 2 project. Josa Constructions Pty Ltd demonstrated extensive experience in water and sewer main construction and/or rehabilitation works (for Sydney Water & others) which is a specialised area of work and they did not demonstrate wider construction experience in playing fields or related works. There were no details of sub-contractors with relevant experience nominated for the project. Nominated persons for the project also did not have any horticultural qualifications and/or experience in similar works except for a smaller scale project for the installation of a synthetic turf multi court installed over two existing bowling greens for a private party. That project appeared to have been undertaken primarily through specialist sub-contractors such as the synthetic turf installer.
Landscape Solutions Pty Ltd offered the next best tender price and confirmed a project program for completion of the project before the 2016 winter sport season. This company demonstrated all of the critical technical experience, whilst achieving the highest effectiveness rating. They have demonstrated that similar or large scale projects of construction of playing fields including field lighting and irrigation have been successfully constructed for Gosford City Council, Mulpha Norwest (Glenmore Park Stage 1), Warringah Council and a number of other clients. Reference checks indicated that the clients were satisfied with their quality of work, time of delivery and with nominated people with relevant experience.
In view of the lack of project specific documentation submitted by Josa Constructions Pty Ltd, it is difficult to assess the risk involved in engaging a lower priced contractor as against a well-referenced contractor with experience in projects of a similar nature and scale for other Councils and also projects within the Penrith LGA. Josa Constructions Pty Ltd were unable to demonstrate their expertise or experience in works of this nature and the scale of this project precludes us from recommending the level of risk required given the project’s prominence and the deadlines for completion to ensure community use of this facility in the upcoming winter season.
Landscape Solutions Pty Ltd have completed the construction of southern fields for the developer and Council officers had no concern with their quality of construction or expertise and experience in this area. The Tender Evaluation Committee recommends Landscape Solutions Pty Ltd be awarded the Tender.
Financial Services Manager’s Comments
Included in the assessment of tenders was the commissioning of independent reference checks, financial analysis, and performance analysis on Landscape Solutions Pty Ltd. These checks were completed by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd and have been reviewed by Financial Services. Based on this review, no concerns were raised as to the ability of Landscape Solutions to perform the works described. The tendered price of $1,295,882 will be funded from the Glenmore Park Stage 2 Active Open Space VPA.
Probity Advisor Comment
Peter Browne (Internal Auditor) assisted the Tender Evaluation Committee with the tender evaluation process and concurred that the tender evaluation process requirements identified in the Council’s Tendering Guidelines have been satisfied.
Tender Advisory Group (TAG) Comment
The Tender Advisory Group consisting of the Chief Governance Officer, Stephen Britten and the Acting Senior Governance Officer, Adam Beggs met to consider a tender for the Construction of Sportsfield & Associated Infrastructure for Glenmore Park Sportsfield Stage 2, Parkway Avenue, Glenmore Park. The TAG did request further information on the experience of Josa Construction and after additional information was provided. This report was considered by Council at the last Ordinary Council meeting and was deferred for discussion at a Councillor Briefing. The TAG has previously supported the recommendation in this report and again supports the recommendation tonight.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Tender Reference 15/16-05 Construction of Sportsfield & Associated Infrastructure for Glenmore Park Sportsfield Stage 2, Park Avenue, Glenmore Park be received 2. Landscape Solutions Pty Ltd be awarded the contract for the Construction of Sportsfield & Associated Infrastructure for Glenmore Park Sportsfield Stage 2, Parkway Avenue Glenmore Park, for an amount of $1,295,882.43 excluding GST. 3. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Penrith be placed on all documentation if necessary. |
ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 5 - We care about our environment
Item Page
6 St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Catchment Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study 38
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
6 |
St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Catchment Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study |
|
Compiled by: Mylvaganam Senthilvasan, Engineering Co-ordinator Policy and Projects
Atiq Atiquzzaman, Senior Engineer Stormwater
Authorised by: Adam Wilkinson, Engineering Services Manager
Outcome |
We care for our environment |
Strategy |
Minimise risks to our community form natural disasters |
Service Activity |
Provide a strategic framework to manage floodplains and inform land use policy |
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to advise Council that the St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study has been completed. The flood study was undertaken in accordance with the NSW Floodplain Development Manual and provides a comprehensive analysis of the St Marys (Byrnes Creek) flooding; defining the flood behaviour and an estimate of flood damages for a range of flood events under the current floodplain condition.
This report recommends that the St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Overland Flow Flood Study be adopted and a communication strategy be implemented to disseminate the study results.
Background
The NSW Government’s Flood Policy is directed at providing solutions to existing flooding problems in developed areas and ensuring that new developments are compatible with the relevant flood hazard and do not create flooding problems in other areas. Under the Policy the management of flood prone land remains the responsibility of Local Government. Policy and floodplain management practices are defined in the NSW Government’s Floodplain Development Manual, April 2005.
The State Government, under its policy, provides specialist technical advice and in some instances financial support to Councils to manage their floodplains. These were provided by the Office of Environment and Heritage in assisting Council undertake this study.
Floodplain Risk Management Studies and Plans for various catchment areas within the Penrith Local Government Area (LGA) will be required to effectively manage Council’s floodplains.
In 2006 Council undertook an “Overland Flow Flood Overview Study” for the entire Local Government Area to:
a) Identify and map all major overland flow paths;
b) Define local flood behaviour in the study area;
c) Assess provisional flood hazard for properties at risk of flooding; and
d) Rank catchment areas in terms of severity of flooding and to assist Council for prioritising catchment areas to undertake detailed flood studies.
The Overland Flow Flood Overview Study, 2006 details the existing forty (40) creek systems and their catchment areas and prioritises these catchment areas based on their severity of flooding. To effectively manage the multitude of studies across the LGA, the catchment areas have been grouped into twenty four (24) Study Areas. As previously reported to Council the study areas have been prioritised and are programmed to complete all floodplain risk management studies and plans.
The Floodplain Risk Management Process involves the following five stages:
1. Data Collection - compilation of existing data and collection of additional data;
2. Flood Study - determines the nature and extent of the flood;
3. Floodplain Risk Management Study - evaluates the options for the floodplain for both existing and proposed development;
4. Floodplain Risk Management Plan - the formalisation of an appropriate floodplain risk management plan for the study area; and
5. Plan Implementation – implementation of the adopted plan.
St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Catchment was identified as one of the highest priority catchment from the 2006 report; requiring a detailed overland flow flood study and a floodplain risk management plan to effectively manage overland flows. The Flood Study represents the first two stages of the floodplain risk management process. The data collection and the detailed Flood Study for the study area commenced a few years ago and has now progressed to completion.
The St Marys (Byrnes Creek) study area is located on the southern side of the Railway line and is generally bounded by M4 Motorway to the south, Marsden Road to the east and St Marys Levee to the west. The study covers an area of approximately 310 hectares (or 3.1 square kilometres) and comprises the St Marys Business District and surrounding areas. The catchment drains to South Creek via Byrnes Creek near Great Western Highway. The study area is highly urbanised and includes an extensive pit and pipe drainage system. The study area also includes St Marys levee which was originally built to minimise the flooding from South Creek.
The primary objectives of the flood study are to define the flood behaviour, provisional hazard and hydraulic categories and also to estimate any flood damage for a range of flood events under current floodplain conditions. The Flood Study will form the basis for the next level of studies; the Floodplain Risk Management Study and the Floodplain Risk Management Plan.
The St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study has now been completed and the study report provides information for a range of flood events. Based on the study results the Flood Planning Areas (FPA) for the study area have been determined. Once the flood study is adopted, Council will apply the section 149 flood planning notations against properties within the FPA.
Communication Strategy
When the flood study is adopted by Council, it is proposed to disseminate flood information and to apply s149 flood planning notations to those properties affected by the FPL.
In consultation with Council’s Communications Team a communications strategy was developed. Communications will include direct contact with property owners as well as a broader media campaign as outlined below:
Direct contact:
a) Council write to all property owners in the catchment, advising them the flood study has been adopted and provide an overview of the process;
b) Provide a link on our web site to the study documents (including mapping);
c) Prepare and distribute a Fact Sheet (Appendix 1) to clarify or answer any anticipated questions. The Fact Sheet will also be made available through Council’s webpage. The proposed Fact Sheet is attached;
d) Assign a staff member and contact telephone line so that any questions or related matters raised by the property owners can be answered;
e) Make staff available for one-to-one discussion if required. For this purpose it is proposed that the property owners interested will be asked to register with Council to attend a one-to-one discussion as this may require input from Development Services or Engineering Services;
Broader communications activities:
f) Key messages (based on the Fact Sheet) will be provided to Councillors, customer service and other appropriate staff to ensure consistent responses are given and enable staff to feel comfortable in responding to enquiries;
g) Media Release detailing the study has been adopted;
h) Highlight current and scheduled mitigation works and the benefit to community (as appropriate);
i) Advertisements on Council’s Corporate News Page about adoption of study; and
j) Content on Council’s Corporate News Page advising the new studies which have been completed and adopted.
Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan
The next stage of the floodplain management process is to undertake a Floodplain Risk Management Study and to develop a Floodplain Risk Management Plans for the study area. Council has now planned to commence the Floodplain Risk Management Study in the 2015/16 financial year subject to adoption of the flood study and also securing adequate grant funding from the NSW Government. Council has already applied for grant funding under the NSW Government’s Floodplain Management Program 2015/16 for this purpose.
The adoption of the Flood Study is important for proceeding with the next level studies which are for undertaking a Floodplain Risk Management Study and developing a Floodplain Risk Management Plan for the study area.
Conclusion
The St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study is now complete. Once the study is adopted by Council it is proposed to disseminate flood information, update s149 flood planning notations and advise property owners about the studies as per the communication strategy detailed above. It is also proposed to undertake a Floodplain Risk Management Study and to develop a Floodplain Risk Management Plans for the study area.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Catchment Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study be received. 2. St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study be adopted. 3. The St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Catchment Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study be made available to the public through Council’s website. 4. Council implement the communication strategy detailed in the body of the report to advise property owners and the public of the adoption of the flood study. 5. Council update s149 (2) flood planning notations by including properties identified by the St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Catchment Detailed Overland Flow Flood Study as affected by the Flood Planning Levels (100 year flood level plus 500mm freeboard). |
ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES
Fact Sheet - St Marys Detailed Overland Flood Study |
3 Pages |
Appendix |
|
St Marys (Byrnes Creek) Detailed Overland Flood Study |
255 Pages |
Attachments Included Under Separate Cover (Website) |
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 6 - We're healthy and share strong community spirit
There were no reports under this Delivery Program when the Business Paper was compiled
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Outcome 7 - We have confidence in our Council
Item Page
7 Pecuniary Interest Returns 50
8 Public Open Space Reinvestment Project - Erskine Park update 58
9 2014-15 Financial Statements 71
10 Summary of Investments and Banking 1 September 2015 to 30 September 2015 73
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
7 |
Pecuniary Interest Returns |
|
Compiled by: Adam Beggs, Acting Senior Governance Officer
Authorised by: Stephen Britten, Chief Governance Officer
Outcome |
We have confidence in our Council |
Strategy |
Demonstrate transparency and ethical behaviour |
Service Activity |
Ensure that the organisation promotes ethical behaviour, risk management, transparent decision making and meets contemporary governance standards |
Executive Summary
Chapter 14 of the Local Government Act, 1993 (the Act) concerns “Honesty and Disclosure of Interests”, and requires all elected members and designated persons to complete an initial Pecuniary Interest Return, and every year thereafter an annual return. Designated persons include the General Manager, other senior staff, and staff holding a position identified by the Council as a position of a designated person, because it involves the exercise of certain functions such as regulatory or contractual functions. First returns have to be completed and lodged within three months of becoming a designated person. Annual returns have to be completed and lodged within three months of 30 June each year. With the exception of two pecuniary interest returns by designated employees, the returns were completed and lodged prior to the due date.
Current Situation
Section 450A of the Act regarding the registration and tabling of returns lodged by Councillors and designated persons is as follows:
Register
and Tabling of Returns
450A.
1. The General Manager must keep a register of returns required to be lodged
with the General Manager under Section 449.
2. Returns required to be lodged with the General Manager under Section 449
must be tabled at a Meeting of the Council, being:
(a) in the
case of a return lodged in accordance with section 449(1) - the first Meeting
held after the last day for lodgement under that subsection; or
(b) in the case of a return lodged in accordance with section 449(3) - the
first Meeting held after the last day for lodgement under that subsection; or
(c) in the case of a return otherwise lodged with the General Manager - the
first Meeting after lodgement.
A register of all returns lodged by Councillors and designated persons, in accordance with Section 449 of the Act, is currently kept by Council as required by this part of the Act.
All returns lodged by Councillors and designated persons under Section 449 of the Act must be tabled at a Council Meeting as outlined in Sections 450A(2)(a), (b) and (c) above.
The following Section 449(3) returns have been lodged:
Councillor |
Return Period |
Date Lodged |
Councillor Jim Aitken OAM |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
8 September 2015 |
Councillor Bernard Bratusa |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
27 July 2015 |
Councillor Prue Car |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
22 September 2015 |
Councillor Marcus Cornish |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
15 July 2015 |
Councillor Kevin Crameri OAM |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
8 September 2015 |
Councillor Greg Davies |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
15 July 2015 |
Councillor Mark Davies |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
29 September 2015 |
Councillor Ross Fowler OAM |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
8 September 2015 |
Councillor Maurice Girotto |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
11 August 2015 |
Councillor Ben Goldfinch |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
15 July 2015 |
Councillor Jackie Greenow OAM |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
27 July 2015 |
Councillor Tricia Hitchen |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 September 2015 |
Councillor Karen McKeown |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
15 July 2015 |
Councillor John Thain |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
22 September 2015 |
Councillor Michelle Tormey |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
8 September 2015 |
Name |
Position Title |
Return Period |
Date Lodged |
Stephen Britten |
Chief Governance Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
David Burns |
Executive Manager – City Assets |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
13 August 2015 |
Craig Butler |
Assistant General Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
Ruth Goldsmith |
Executive Manager – City Planning & Community |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
Barry Husking |
Assistant General Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
13 August 2015 |
Wayne Mitchell |
Executive Manager – Environment & City Development |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
Vicki O’Kelly |
Executive Manager - Corporate |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Alan Stoneham |
General Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
3 September 2015 |
Position Title |
Return Period |
Date Lodged |
|
Terry Agar |
Place Management Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Krishti Akhter |
Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Alexx Alagiah |
Asset Systems Engineer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
24 September 2015 |
Michael Alderton |
Development Engineering Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
21 August 2015 |
Helen Bakker |
Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
19 August 2015 |
Graham Bambrick |
Customer Service Supervisor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Adam Beggs |
Governance Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
31 July 2015 |
Mark Berry |
Supply Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
29 September 2015 |
Kristin Blain |
Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Peter Blazek |
Property Management Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Darrell Boggs |
Ranger - General |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Andrew Boles |
RID Squad Investigation Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
13 August 2015 |
Tathra Bor |
Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
28 September 205 |
Belinda Borg |
Senior Environmental Planner DA |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
17 September 2015 |
Jade Bradbury |
Business Coordinator Children’s Services |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Daniel Braid |
Ranger – Parking |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Mark Broderick |
Planning & Advocacy Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
Chris Brown |
Recreation Facilities & Programs Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Peter Browne |
Internal Auditor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Matthew Bullivant |
Senior Legal Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
3 August 2015 |
Amanda Burns |
Companion Animals Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
24 September 2015 |
Greg Butchard |
Parks Operations Co-ordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Alison Butler |
Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Ruth Byrnes |
Senior Traffic Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
12 August 2015 |
Laurence Cafarella |
Acting Emergency Management Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Rosemarie Canales |
Architectural Supervisor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
13 August 2015 |
Matthew Casey |
RID Squad Investigation Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Allison Cattell |
Senior Environmental Planner DA |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Heather Chaffey |
Neighbourhood Renewal Programme Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Tracy Chalk |
Waste & Community Protection Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Abdul Cheema |
Senior Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Gavin Cherry |
Principal Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Leo Chow |
Senior Engineer – Major Developments |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Judy Cobb |
Neighbourhood Facilities Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Belinda Comer |
Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
Julie Condon |
Development Enquiry & Customer Service Coorindator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
12 August 2015 |
Wendy Connell |
Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Kelly Connor |
Senior Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
29 September 2015 |
Robert Craig |
Principal Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Aldo Credaro |
Asset Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
24 September 2015 |
Mark Cremona |
Senior Engineer – Major Developments |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
Anthony Crichton |
Senior Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Teresa Dalton |
Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
Jeanne De La Torre |
Ranger - Parking |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Monique Desmarchelier |
Healthy Strategy Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Colin Dickson |
Marketing Partnerships & Events Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
31 July 2015 |
Hamish Dodson |
Asset Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Michael Doggett |
Supply Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Laurie Doolan |
Ranger |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
30 September 2015 |
Phillip Doy |
Compliance Technical Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
David Drozd |
Traffic Engineering Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
David Durie |
Senior Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
24 September 2015 |
David Ellks |
Property Projects Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Vince Emmerick |
RID Squad Investigation Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Rodney Esdaile |
Senior Development Engineer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Adrian Estreich |
Team Leader (Environment) |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Joshua Fayle |
Senior Human Resource Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Ari Fernando |
Design & Projects & Design Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Craig Field |
City Centres Operations Supervisor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
24 September 2015 |
Garry Fletcher |
Development Engineer Inspector |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
17 August 2015 |
Noel Fuller |
Coord Ranger & Animal Services |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Carlie Fulton |
Senior Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
19 August 2015 |
Nabil Garas |
Ranger - Parking |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Joshua Giblin |
Human Resource Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
11 August 2015 |
Stephen Gillis |
RID Squad Snr Investigation Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
Joe Gleeson |
Graduate Environmental Health and Building Surveyor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Geoff Goodacre |
Environmental Health & Building Surveyor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
John Gordon |
Parks Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 September 2015 |
Tim Gowing |
Senior Waterways Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 September 2015 |
Peter Graham |
Works Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Stephanie Gray |
Neighbourhood Facilities Development Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 September 2015 |
Graham Green |
Senior Traffic Engineer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
12 August 2015 |
Vanessa Griffin |
Team Leader Building Approvals |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Paul Grimson |
City Planning Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Jenny Guice |
Senior Sustainability Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Andrew Gunner |
HR Systems Administrator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Murray Halls |
Public Domain Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
13 August 2015 |
Carmel Hamilton |
Sustainability Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
18 August 2015 |
Elizabeth Hanlon |
Senior Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Christopher Hawkins |
Senior Environmental Health & Building Surveyor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
11 August 2015 |
Jane Hetherington |
Environmental Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Andrew Hewson |
Sustainability Education Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
19 August 2015 |
Kerry Hiatt |
Records Management Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
3 August 2015 |
John Hollier |
Planning Information Unit Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Jenna Hore |
Senior Biodiversity Strategy Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Graham Howe |
Building Projects & Maintenance Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
11 August 2015 |
Joe Ibbitson |
Community Programmes Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Craig Izzard |
RID Squad Investigation Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
30 September 2015 |
Michael Jackson |
Design & Projects Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Tanya Jackson |
Corporate Development Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Amanda James |
Human Resource Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Schandel Jefferys
|
Senior Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
Sellathurai Kananathan |
Ranger - Parking |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Nadarajah Karunakaran |
Projects Engineer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
29 September 2015 |
Janet Keegan |
Children’s Services Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
29 September 2015 |
Olivia Kidon |
Community Safety Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Stephen Krimmer |
Supervisor - Certification |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
John Krkach |
Building Maintenance Supervisor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Allison Kyriakakis |
Community Safety Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Peter Lang |
Marketing Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
17 September 2015 |
Gary Lawson |
Traffic & Special Events Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Tracy Leahy |
Community Programmes Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Aimee Lee |
Senior Environmental Planner DA |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Paul Lemm |
Development & Environmental Health Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
29 September 2015 |
Ju Li |
Project Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
17 August 2015 |
Lynda Lowe |
Cemeteries Supervisor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
25 September 2015 |
Ryan Maestri |
Environmental Health and Building Surveyor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
17 August 2015 |
Nadia Maganga (Kocoski) |
Infrastructure Bond Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Barbara Magee |
Corporate Communications and Marketing Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Alam Mahbub |
Environmental Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Joshua Martin |
Building Asset Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Christine Martyn |
Administration Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
17 August 2015 |
Stephen Masters |
Senior Engineer Major Developments |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Paul Maynard |
Ranger - General |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Glenn McCarthy |
Executive/Public Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
31 July 2015 |
John McConnell |
Organisational Learning & Development Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Mark McLachlan |
Restorations Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Brendan McLister |
Project Engineer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Johannes Meijer |
City Works Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Michael Mendham |
Neighbourhood Facilities Operations Supervisor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Sarah Meszaros |
Animal Services Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Anthony Milanoli |
Senior Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Marnie Mitchell |
Human Resource Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
17 August 2015 |
Andrew Moore |
Financial Services Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Matthew Morris |
Parks Program Co-ordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
3 August 2015 |
Jennifer Moses |
Sustainability Research Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
18 August 2015 |
Kenneth Muir |
Risk Management Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
Matthew Nicholson |
Senior Works Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
25 September 2015 |
Jonathan Page |
Supervisor Development Compliance |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
30 September 2015 |
Graham Pares |
Strategic Planning Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Geoff Payne |
WHS & IM Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Yvonne Perkins |
Public Domain Amenity and Safety Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Fiona Plesman |
Organisational Performance and Development Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
30 September 2015 |
Jeni Pollard |
Place Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Aisha Poole |
Resource Recovery Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
11 August 2015 |
Pukar Pradhan |
Senior Environmental Planner DA |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Anthony Price |
Environmental Health Co-ordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Steven Purvis |
Senior Ranger - General |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Krystie Race |
Sustainability Research Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
18 August 2015 |
Daria Rech |
Stormwater Management Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
19 August 2015 |
Andrew Robinson |
Recreation Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
8 September 2015 |
Matthew Rose |
Senior Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Stacey Rossetto |
Corporate Communications & Marketing Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Evan Rowse |
Tree Management Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
3 August 2015 |
Garth Russell |
Works Coordinator (Contracts) |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Ross Russell |
Supply Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Barry Ryan |
Coordinator RID Squad |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Eric Ryffel |
Rid Sqad Investigator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Mitchell Sammut |
Recreation Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
3 August 2015 |
Sarah Sampson |
Development Compliance Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Karin Schicht |
Landscape Architectural Supervisor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Glenn Schuil |
Senior Governance Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
3 August 2015 |
Laura Schuil |
Supply Officer – Contracts |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Myl Senthilvasan |
Engineering Coordinator Policy & Projects |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Fred Shockair |
Senior Engineer - Major Developments |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
21 September 2015 |
Therrie Silvello |
Recreation Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Gurvinder Singh |
Senior Environmental Planner DA - Team Leader |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
11 September 2015 |
Indar Singh |
Environmental Health & Building Surveyor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Walter Sinnadurai |
Transportation Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
17 August 2015 |
Kate Smith |
Senior Environmental Planner |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Jessie Soster |
Senior Environmental Compliance Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
8 September 2015 |
Carl Spears |
Principal Communications Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
11 September 2015 |
Craig Squires |
Supervisor Fire Safety |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
Gowry Sriskandagowrythasan |
Civil Operations Engineer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
Colin Stevenson |
Library Services Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
16 September 2015 |
Joan Suckling |
Resources Librarian |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Ratnam Thilliyar |
Engineering Stormwater Supervisor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
Laurie Tillot |
Environmental Health & Building Surveyor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Wayne Trew |
Project Coordinator Development Contributions |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Virginia Tuckerman |
Recreation Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
30 September 2015 |
Joe Vecchio |
Compliance Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
Joe Vocisano |
Ranger - Parking |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
11 August 2015 |
Drago Vrh |
Environmental Health & Building Surveyor |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Beth Wade-Ferrell |
Companion Animals Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Erich Weller |
Community and Cultural Development Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
19 August 2015 |
Adam Wilkinson |
Engineering Services Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Gordon Williams |
Environmental Planner DA |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
4 September 2015 |
Sid Wilson |
Building Asset Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
30 September 2015 |
Therese Winn |
Casual Environmental Health Officer |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
Colin Wood |
Building Compliance Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
1 September 2015 |
Peter Wood |
Development Assessment Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Allegra Zakis |
Corporate Development Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
The following Section 449 (1) first returns have been lodged:
Name |
Position Title |
Due Date |
Date lodged |
Clare Aslanis |
Environmental Planner |
30 September 2015 |
10 September 2015 |
Kate Bradshaw |
Contamination Management Officer |
30 September 2015 |
31 August 2015 |
Lyndsey Cannell |
Environmental Health Officer |
30 September 2015 |
19 August 2015 |
Joel Carson |
Senior Planner |
30 September 2015 |
10 August 2015 |
Luke Caruana |
Trainee Environmental Health and Building Surveyor |
30 September 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Amanda Collins |
Children’s Services Development Officer |
30 September 2015 |
7 August 2015 |
Colin Cordrey |
Property Portfolio Coordinator |
30 September 2015 |
29 September 2015 |
James Creer |
Waste Education Officer |
30 September 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Gannon Cuneo |
Graduate Environmental Planner |
30 September 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Daniel Davidson |
Senior Traffic Engineer |
30 September 2015 |
30 September 2015 |
Sandy Davies |
Workforce & Workplace Manager |
30 September 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Brad Dekruif |
Development Engineer |
30 September 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Nicole Dukinfield |
Senior Planner |
30 September 2015 |
4 August 2015 |
Donna Finn |
Contamination Management Officer |
30 September 2015 |
3 August 2015 |
Hannah Gilvear |
Trainee Environmental Planner |
30 September 2015 |
18 August 2015 |
Bill Hilder |
Depot and Fleet Co-ordinator |
30 September 2015 |
6 August 2015 |
Belinda Hobbs |
Contamination Management Officer |
30 September 2015 |
3 August 2015 |
Donita Hulme |
Cultural Engagement Officer |
30 September 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Joshua Johnson |
Planning Assistant |
30 September 2015 |
12 August 2015 |
Louise Keighran |
Property Projects Coordinator |
30 September 2015 |
30 July 2015 |
Lila Kennelly |
Community Engagement Officer |
30 September 2015 |
20 August 2015 |
Natasha Lee |
Children’s Services Co-ordinator |
30 September 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Lawrence Ligato |
Trainee Environmental Health and Building Surveyor |
30 September 2015 |
11 August 2015 |
Grant Matthews |
Animal Services Officer |
30 September 2015 |
31 July 2015 |
Mladen Mejakic |
Project Officer Capital Works |
30 September 2015 |
5 August 2015 |
Michael Middleton |
Team Leader (Health) |
30 September 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
David Monsiegneur |
Parking Officer |
30 September 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Justin Murphy |
Waste Education Officer |
30 September 2015 |
31 July 2015 |
Mitchell Nobbs |
Trainee Environmental Health Officer |
30 September 2015 |
21 September 2015 |
Carmel O’Farrell |
Children’s Services Co-ordinator |
30 September 2015 |
23 September 2015 |
Matthew Rawson |
Environmental Planner |
30 September 2015 |
12 August 2015 |
Joshua Romeo |
Waste Education Officer |
30 September 2015 |
12 August 2015 |
Damien Saaghy |
Environmental Health and Building Surveyor |
30 September 2015 |
17 September 2015 |
Amy Schembri |
Trainee Environmental Health Officer |
30 September 2015 |
11 August 2015 |
Holly Tallon |
Human Resource Officer |
30 September 2015 |
31 July 2015 |
Lauren Van Etten |
Environmental Planner |
30 September 2015 |
18 August 2015 |
Lisa Wells |
Environmental Health Officer |
30 September 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
Lisa Wright |
Children’s Services Co-ordinator |
30 September 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
There were three pecuniary interest returns which were not completed by the due
date of 30 September 2015 (table below), of those, the first one in the table
was from a staff member who was not at work between the time the returns were
issued for completion and the due date, due to annual leave. All three returns
which were not completed by the due date have now been received prior to this
meeting tonight.
Name |
Position Title |
Return Period |
Date Lodged |
Antanas Zukauskas |
Assistant Works Coordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
7 October 2015 |
Chris Moulang |
Property Development Manager |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
6 October 2015 |
Deone White |
Children’s Services Co-ordinator |
1 July 2014 - 30 June 2015 |
21 October 2015 |
With the exception of the three pecuniary interest returns discussed above, the returns were completed and lodged prior to the due date for the receipt of the returns and are kept in a register held by the Acting Senior Governance Officer. The Acting Senior Governance Officer will table the returns at tonight’s meeting.
The then Department of Local Government issued Pecuniary Interest Guidelines in June 2006. Section 112 of the Guidelines states:-“Where an apparent or possible breach of the pecuniary interest provisions by a Councillor, committee member, adviser or designated person comes to the General Manager’s attention, the General Manager should review all the relevant information. If, having done so, the General Manager considers the information shows evidence consistent with a breach, he or she should notify the Department of Local Government and forward relevant material and a short statement of relevant circumstances”.
Contact has been previously made with Office of Local Government to seek advice regarding the failure of employees to lodge their pecuniary interest returns on time. The advice received back indicated that Office should be advised of the alleged breaches.
That: 1. The information contained in the report on Pecuniary Interest Returns be received 2. Council officers write to the Office of Local Government notifying that three designated employees did not lodge their pecuniary interest returns by the due date. |
ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES
Ordinary Meeting 26 October 2015
8 |
Public Open Space Reinvestment Project - Erskine Park update |
|
Compiled by: Amanda McMurtrie, Strategic Property Officer
Authorised by: Andrew Moore, Financial Services Manager
Outcome |
We have confidence in our Council |
Strategy |
Ensure our finances and assets are sustainable and services are delivered efficiently |
Service Activity |
Manage Council's financial sustainability and meet statutory requirements |
Executive Summary
Our residents have told us they want us to continue improving their parks. They want their open space to include contemporary recreation options like water play, outdoor gyms, dog off leash areas and more shade. They want a focus on quality not quantity, and they want their improved parks connected to their neighbourhoods with better pathways. While funding these improvements is a challenge, it also presents an opportunity to re-examine the future of those parks that are not meeting residents’ expectations and to develop a model for funding park improvements across other suburbs.
Erskine Park was used as a pilot project to gather feedback on the Community’s recreation priorities, identify the availability and suitability of Council parks in the suburb and to gauge community support for funding quality improvements to open spaces in their suburb, by selling some of the Council owned land that is not meeting the Community’s current recreation needs.
Council owns 19 parks and reserves in Erskine Park and provides approximately 30% more open space than the widely accepted standard for the provision of local open space within an urban context. All the parks in Erskine Park were acquired by Council as a form of local infrastructure contribution in the 1980s-90s, at a time when a large number of small open spaces was considered appropriate. A small number of these parks are either too small, too isolated, too hidden or too irregularly shaped to be well used by the Community, while others are too close to others to justify improvement or retention.
Combining the Community feedback we received through focus groups, drop-in sessions and over 200 resident survey responses with an independent recreation study, we developed a draft Open Space Master Plan (OSMP). The Plan identified which parks should be upgraded and which open space land should be considered for sale to fund improvements.
This report seeks Council endorsement to begin the process towards funding park upgrades and the sale of selected unsuitable reserves. Adoption of the recommendations of this report by Council will commence a process that would seek to reclassify and rezone certain Council owned land located within Erskine Park and allocate the funding to advance the initial improvements identified in the report.
Delivering on any agreed upgrades is an important element of this project as it demonstrates to the Community that Council has a commitment to fund the proposed improvements from the sales of reserves in a timely manner. This report proposes that $2.65m of works identified be delivered upfront and forward funded by Council.
Background
There are a number of Council’s properties (classified as community) which over the years have been identified as being potentially surplus to Council and community needs. This process initially commenced with the People’s Lifestyle Aspiration and Needs Study (PLANS) adopted by Council in 2004 and the Open Space Action Plan adopted in 2007. These plans identified several parcels of land classified as open space which offer limited recreational use by the community and may present opportunities for divestment and/or conversion to another purpose.
The current work in Erskine Park represents a pilot project for the broader Public Open Space Reinvestment Project. This project generally applies to our more established neighbourhoods and aims to create an opportunity to contemporise open space throughout these areas that will revitalise current usage and provide a network that will provide for future needs. In reviewing potential pilot suburbs, consideration was given to the general readiness and knowledge of the surplus parcels in each suburb.
Erskine Park emerged as a preferred pilot suburb given the identification of parcels by PLANS and the recent rescinding of the s94 Contributions Plan which also identified a number of additional parcels as surplus.
Open space is relatively evenly distributed throughout Erskine Park. Most of the reserves in the suburb have limited landscaping comprising turf and limited healthy native trees. Few reserves have any internal paths, seats, shelters or play facilities. Erskine Park is distant from all of Penrith City’s District level recreation facilities. These facilities include the Great River Walk (Nepean River), Jamison Park, Werrington Creek Park, Ripples and Kingsway Playing Field.
All parcels intended to be rezoned as part of this pilot project in Erskine Park are proposed to be given a R2 Low Density Residential zone. The application of this zone will ensure that the established character of development in the area is maintained.
Framework for review
Independent consultants, Clouston, were engaged to design a framework to guide this review of local open space in Erskine Park. An initial spatial analysis of the distribution, provision and accessibility of local open space in Erskine Park was followed by the assessment of individual open space parcels using an evaluation criteria matrix. Recommendations were then developed based on both the suburb analysis and the merits of individual parcels.
Application of the method to assess open space across the suburb of Erskine Park highlighted a number of open space parcels of limited recreational or other benefit to the community, and surplus to the community’s existing and likely future needs. Divestment of these land will provide an opportunity to improve existing, valued open space by reinvesting the funds generated from the sale of surplus lands. Each of the 19 reserves in Erskine Park has been evaluated and recommendations made as to whether to retain and reinvest, sell part of the reserve to better consolidate the remaining space in each reserve or sell the park.
In determining the adequacy of open space and recreation facilities in Erskine Park, it is useful to compare the current level of open space being provided in Erskine Park with the most common recreation demand standard of 2.83 hectares/1000 people, which equates to 18.9 hectares of open space being required in Erskine Park. Currently, Erskine Park has in excess of 24 hectares of public open space. Should the land identified for reclassification and rezoning progress and this land be sold for low density housing, the level of open space provided in Erskine Park will remain 22% above the general standard of open space provision.
In considering options for retention, consolidation or disposal of reserves, a number of options were considered:
· Retain and if/where appropriate, improve.
· Partial disposal, retaining the core of the reserve but disposing of corners or extensions of the reserve that do not add value or are obscured to public views
· Partial disposal, retaining only sufficient space to ensure a generous public thoroughfare
· Disposal of the entire reserve, reinvesting funds generated to improve other local reserves or walking/cycling paths in the locality.
Professional assessment was the critical first step in evaluating the reserves in Erskine Park. However, it was acknowledged that the outcomes will only be enduring, robust and ‘owned’ by the community if they are included as part of that process.
Community Consultation
A crucial component of the Erskine Park pilot has involved consultation with the community prior to making any formal decisions about whether any of these small land parcels could be sold, with the funds generated to be reinvested in the City’s open space network and other community priorities.
The consultation program follows the delivery of three focus groups with residents across the Penrith City Council area, held in early March 2015 to test community views on this topic. The outcomes of these sessions helped inform Council’s approach to the pilot engagement program in Erskine Park.
During April and May this year, Council officers spoke to the Erskine Park community about the opportunity to fund sustainable improvements in recreation spaces in Erskine Park, by selling some of the Council owned land that is not meeting the community’s recreation needs. This consultation sought general feedback on the concept and identified spaces where community members would like to see improvements and spaces that were viewed as underutilised by the community. The Stage One survey found that there was broad support for the concept, with 73% of respondents indicating that they either strongly support or somewhat support the concept.
The information collected in Stage One, along with technical studies commissioned by Council has informed the development of a draft Open Space Master Plan (OSMP) which identifies specific sites where improvements could be made, the types of upgrades and facilities needed, and which underutilised spaces might be sold to fund improvements.
This is a complex conversation which has prompted a wide range of views across the community. The draft OSMP was presented to the community for consideration as part of Stage Two consultation. The feedback received during Stage Two has been carefully analysed and used to help refine the Master Plan and inform the way forward. This second stage of the consultation was a critical milestone for the project as it provided the Erskine Park Community an opportunity to validate the data gathered in the first stage and also the technical studies and ultimately shape the proposal being considered tonight.
The majority of feedback was collected at the two community drop in sessions on Saturday 5 September, 10am – 1pm at Chameleon Reserve; and Thursday 10 September, 6:30 – 8:30pm at Erskine Park Community Centre.
Support for the range of proposed improvements in the Draft Masterplan was fairly evenly split, with survey responses indicating:
· 53% strongly (31.1%) or somewhat supported (21%) the proposed improvements
· 47% strongly (39.5%) or somewhat opposed (7.6%) the improvements
Many comments focused on specific sites. For example, specific comments about Chameleon Reserve were supportive of the ideas outlined in the opportunities map and the recommendations in the Draft Masterplan.
The specific locations that were most mentioned throughout the survey were Warbler and Aquarius reserves. Many of the comments focused on concern over the partial sale of these reserves and of the 56 respondents who strongly or somewhat opposed the range of proposed improvements, approximately 35 made comments expressing their opposition to the sale of Warbler or Aquarius Reserves. Additional community feedback in the form of a resident petition identified Warbler Reserve as being a well-used reserve with strong community connections.
In light of this feedback, the draft OSMP has been amended to retain these reserves. Given the rationale to deliver improvements in those neighbourhoods where excess parcels are proposed for either part or full sale, the draft OSMP will also need to be amended to reprioritise the range of improvements recommended to Aquarius and Warbler reserve to the longer term.
In addition, Community feedback about Mohawk and Sennar Reserve has led to a reduction to the extent of the reserve proposed for residential development, which is now proposed to accommodate 2 standard lots as opposed to the 6 standard lots originally included.
Council’s consultation program has been designed to allow the community to have their say at all stages of the project, and importantly, prior to any decisions being made about sales, funds or improvements. The limited percentage of open space proposed to be sold would be developed in line with the surrounding properties, which is low density residential.
The outcomes of the Stage 2 Erskine Park pilot consultation program would warrant Council moving to the next stage to rezone and reclassify those reserves identified in the draft Open Space Master Plan for full or partial sale.
Draft Open Space Master Plan Erskine Park
Council engaged a consultant to independently develop an OSMP for Erskine Park which aims to ensure that the project will deliver improvements to the amenity and recreation options available to the community.
Stage 1 of the community engagement process revealed the open space areas that are of highest value to the community, those that have the potential to better meet community needs and has informed Council of the types of improvements that area a priority to the Erskine Park community. This feedback was used to develop the initial draft of the OSMP. The results of the Stage 2 consultation have further refined the draft OSMP.
Some parks in Erskine Park already feature recreation infrastructure while others remain largely unembellished. The rationale for assigning priorities to capital works in the Draft OSMP is to ensure equitable access to recreation infrastructure across the suburb, as well as to deliver open space improvements in those neighbourhoods where excess parcels are proposed for disposal.
The draft OSMP consists of an Open Space Network comprised of open space areas each with its own character and function, and of a network of connecting pathways and linkages that enables the community to take advantage of the full recreational offering available.
Land proposed for improvement and potential divestment
Extensive community engagement in Erskine Park has assisted Council in determining the community’s priorities. The proposed list of reserves for possible disposal was reviewed and in some cases has been revised after consideration of the community feedback.
There are 3 groupings of community land which have been identified as being potentially surplus to Council and the community needs in Erskine Park. The first two groups include reserves which have been identified for either full disposal or part disposal taking into account community feedback and Clouston’s’ review. The third group includes those sites identified in the rescinded Erskine Park S94 Plan which are no longer required to meet community and drainage needs.
Specific sites identified for disposal or part disposal are identified in the table below. Specific details including land area, zoning and aerial photographs are provided in Appendix 1.
Reserve Name |
Address |
Group 1 = Proposed for full disposal |
|